Climate change, Russian aggression make for a perfect storm in Canada’s north
Вставка
- Опубліковано 11 лис 2022
- As climate change reshapes our planet, the geopolitical landscape is also changing.
In Canada’s north, the melting ice has led to a power play for influence and resources. Russian aggression on the world stage has created new and urgent attention on the security of Canada’s Arctic.
Earlier this fall, a Canadian navy icebreaker sailed to an area in the far north for the first time.
For this week’s episode of The New Reality, Jeff Semple spent time on board as the crew navigated uncharted waters.
For more info, please go to globalnews.ca/national/progra...
Subscribe to Global News Channel HERE: bit.ly/20fcXDc
Like Global News on Facebook HERE: bit.ly/255GMJQ
Follow Global News on Twitter HERE: bit.ly/1Toz8mt
Follow Global News on Instagram HERE: bit.ly/2QZaZIB
#GlobalNews #climatechange
Canada really needs to start pulling its weight when it comes to defence. If a nation like Australia, which has a smaller population, can outgun you. It's probably time to expand.
Like ukraine austraila has byallowing a build up of usa forces and jiont training xercise has volunteered to be a punching bag for china . In a sense . Like wise tiwain will be used to keepthe chinese navy penned in to the first island chain. After the great sucess in Afghanitan i am certain the usa will Prevail under wise leadership of thier young vigerous comander in chief biden
BTW, in Afghanistan, a bunch of Canadian Engineers from one unit came up with an IED/mine detecting robot for a fraction of what the US machine costs.
@@LoneBrowncoat That's impressive, but that's not particularly hard when all US defence contractors use cost-plus contracts to spend the absolute maximum while delivering mediacracy.
@@HexaSquirrel ...There's a missing post of mine...shadow deleted-- we really need some alternative to UA-cam. FREE SPEECH!!!!!! Didn't think I was going to need Notepad to protect my words as there was nothing politically incorrect in it.
@@LoneBrowncoat Quite a number of people are copying all their videos to Odysee .... so if UA-cam deletes their Channel, it can live on. Also on Odysee, comments don't get shadow-deleted and you don't get shadow-banned.
Some navys have icebreakers because they break ice for an actual navy.
Should maybe make arctic bases so they cannot "liberate" our territory.
Harper cancelled everything ....
@@jasondrummond9451what did Harper cancel?
Russian arctic patrol vessel: 100mm gun
Danish patrol vessel for Greenland: times two 76mm & one 35mm CWIS
Norwegian arctic patrol vessel: 57mm
Canadian artic patrol vessel: one teeny weeny yellow poka dot 25mm
@@pa610 And there are seaborne (aquatic) drones as well as aerial. Good for bridges and ships.
Multiple gun turrets mostly committed to anti air. Radar guided & remotely controlled from below armoured deck.
said 100mm is outdated - fires less explosives per minute than said 76.2mm and 57mm cannons, the 100mm's also highly inaccurate as with other soviet naval cannons
@@blisteringstars Payload isn't everything: maximum range M38 25mm Bushmaster 2000 yards, Russian 100mm gun, maximum range 20 km.
The canadians new vessels can also be modified and armed with more powerful weapons if needed these ain't really ment to be heavily armed tho that'd what are frigates are for
Its called the arctic war ice is melting they new paths open for shipping means alot of money along with all the other untapped resources. The arctic war will be a big one.
The ice isn't melting. Hundreds of stranded global warming vessels prove that!
Canada has declined to allow british dubmarines passage thru these waters as to not set a precedent. and fear of them or other nations begining a Pattern that could be seen as a declaration of this as a internationally navitable water way subject to unternational law and therfore not canadaian waterways
Canadas co2 footprint is 536 metric tons and our trees cleanup about 6.8 billion metric tons of co2.
CO2 = Plant Food.
@@supmdude1527 Imagine trying to refute a claim and not sending a link to said info.
@@supmdude1527 which mainstream, state-funded propaganda outlet printed that headline?
@@dontforget2289 _"Imagine trying to refute a claim and not sending a link to said info."_ ... Says the OP who didn't provide any sources to his/her claim. 🤦
_“The first indication of stupidity is a complete lack of shame.”_ -Sigmund Freud
Canada has 318 billion trees, 8953 per person. We emit 675,918,610 tons of CO2/year. It takes 100 trees to remove 1 ton of CO2 from the atmosphere per year. Therefore it takes 68 Billion trees to capture our CO2. Canada doesn't need more trees we need a PM that can do math.
Lmao Our entire navy couldnt protect p.e.i let alone the arctic with a bow mounted slingshot on a dinky icebreaker
This should be a wake up call for Canadians. You have people out on a small boat with barely any weapons for defence. I think the news is finally starting to address the need for military equipment upgrades.
How do you suppose Canada pay for military upgrades? Print more money?
@@RepublicOfWesternCanadaNOW That’s the last thing I want but we can cancel unnecessary programs that the liberals placed? We could idk try being more independent. We have options but we also have an over priced government for what we get. No progress was really made in the last 20 years in general.
@@jordanhulley2184 CONservatives are the ones who spent 80M$ (or what it 800M$?) on the blue-prints alone for these useless ships. You want to talk wasteful spending, talk to conservatives who lined their pockets with it.
@@MelioraCogito You pointed out one minor thing that’s actually justified but you seem to be talking about a topic you know nothing about. Buying ships and producing them are two very different things. The liberals are no better than the Chinese or Russians by forcing their unpopular opinions and ideology. You come across as someone who would vote liberal or NDP who have both caused massive inflation lol if you work for a living this would be an issue.
@@jordanhulley2184 .....BTW......Look up C.D. Howe, the major booster for AVRO and led Canada's WW2 "Industrial Revolution" and old school Liberal party member.
Our government is laughable at best. This isn't a game.
Lol you are probably one of those cut the budget conservatives. You want it both ways
@@rcpmac Your bland Assumption is disappointing and laughable. How you turned my comment into something like that just suck's, I fully support the environment and our military. And this current government isn't doing anything about it.
The climate is cyclical. (warm, cold, warm, cold,...)
yeah year round is like that not big deal.
Stop being Stupid AND Foolish.
The biggest point working against the climate activists is that they say climate change is such a big problem immediate action is necessary --- unless that country is China, despite China being, by far, the single biggest contributor to the problem.
I'll take the climate activists seriously when they finally start demanding actions be taken against China.
Yes and if the climate was following its normal pattern it would be cooling not waeming. Where did you get your degree in physics.
@@jonmce1 there is not way of stopping the end of the earth or time does not matter how many degree in physics, everything that has a beginning will end.
there should be HIMAR and Patriot missile batteries strategically placed throughout every province
For what?
In Canada we have the luxury of location. At some point, someone is going to want what we have and they are going to take it. They will take it because on our own we don't have the will to resist any aggression. If you think some ice breaker is going to make a difference you are mistaken.
Ya ok lol, you’d be surprised how many people would jump a call to action if Canada was invaded.
As you might know both Denmark and Canada are co-founding NATO members. It seems many in Canada believes the recent agreement making Canada and Greenland land sharing neighbours at Hans Island had that as focus point but that are not the case at all. The entire border agreement covers a vast area from the tip of Greenland and basically nearly all the way to the pole. This agreement makes border enforcement easier for both The Kingdom of Denmark and Canada as well as NATO/NORAD. Any weird thoughts that might have brewed in Russia or even China should now be buried for good.
NOBODY in the free world will allow our borders to be violated.
Our allies have as much to lose as we do.
and we are NATO.
I think Canada needs to increase military spending not on hammers or nice videos of the North but new subs, long range missiles and large icebreaker ships to support Nato and our North.
You snooze you lose. 💲💲💲
Trudeau will send in the horsey goons!
for a country like Canada the Royal Canadian Navy is awfully small . . .
Tell us about your boss Global? What does he tell you before each work day?
. . . Du villst ownt nottink undt be happisch!
to make up the news according to his will.
I find it odd that Global News has 3.3 Million Subscribers. That's way more than CBC.
Canada's next subs should address the shortfall in sovereignty security
Why are we so far behind? 😫1952 defences?!! Come on Trudeau..
North Warning System was last upgraded in 1985, according to the video.
@@annoyed707 the warning system..yeh..
As much fear inspiring this video wants you to feel, Russians invading canadian lands in the arctic will NEVER happen. We are the USA's closest and most important ally, politically and strategically. If Russia attacks Canadian land, the US WILL declare war on Russia; and considering how poorly things are going in Ukraine for Russia, any Arctic incursions would be a massive failure for Russia geopolitically.
But like I said.
It will never happen.
Russia can open its waters to China, which will hold a gun to Canada and US head this way, it is better to be prepared. Building bases and ships will take time.
True but still Canada should have the ability to defend its boarders..... and I can't believe we have the ability to develop a nuclear weapons and we don't. Canada should not depend on the US for defence.. let's call Canada the 51st state..
It won't be Russian military incursions initially it will be Russian commercial incursions, exploration, challenge of our arctic sovereignty with a few off shore exploration rigs and then on shore. The Canadian military would respond (as best it could) and maybe convene a few meetings. In response to naked aggression against Russian commercial interests by the Canadian military, the Russian military would respond and send Canada packing without an interaction. The US is in no position to respond in the Arctic.
@@ianspeedy Canada does have the technological, scientific and industrial capabilities for develop our own nukes. But that is only happening at the last resort
@@tedyuan2066 I know that but by then it will be too late, i am assuming you understand how long it take to train and have a ready units to defend this country. And all around us have the ability to do so. And we can't count on the US for everything just from one change in presidency the theme was USA first.
Meanwhile me worrying why Artic is melting ..... haha .... damm fool
Witnessing Russia's performance in Ukraine if they feel the need to pick a fight with Canada over the north, I'm confident that a few Navy Cadets in a row boat will be capable of sending them back to Siberia.
You wouldn't use a computer from 1985 would you? ... Typed from a 1985 computer ;)
We gotta protect our northern sovereignty 🇨🇦
i agreed lets start by getting nuclear weapons in canada we have none.
@@ididnotdoit1188 all our allies have enough nukes to protect us and would probably start looking at us sideways if we randomly started building them. Waste of money.
@@grandcentral3007 Always best to have our own in case all the allies nukes failed or says Not their business to protect Canada.
@@ididnotdoit1188 what I'm saying is that nuclear weapons are not something we would do unilaterally.
@@grandcentral3007 well how about nuclear powered submarines and icebreakers. We can do that
we as canadians can pull together we did it in ww1 and ww2 we just need to develop on our own
Lol, your logic is laughable.
The climate has been changing since the beginning of time.
People can't afford to put gas in their cars or food on the table or heat their homes.
Burn wood and garbage. Drive old polluting vehicles
Stop being Stupid AND Foolish.
Yes but when the climate has changed in the past it has had consequences for organisms relying upon it. Anoxic bacteria went extinct 2 billion years ago when oxygen abundances from photosynthetic processes by blue green algae became prominent in the atmosphere. About 95 % of life went extinct 250 million years ago when the Siberian Satraps increased carbon abundances in the atmosphere . Curtis you rely on a stable environment where you live to allow you to afford whatever life style you have. If that changes doesn't matter what you can afford because nature doesn't care what you can or cannot afford. A tornado doesn't pick or choose. Flooding rivers or fierce forest fires don't stop at your house and move past. You have relied on a status quo kind of climate for a long time (been around for about 10,000 years) but if it no longer is the status quo you either get with the picture or drown in the flood. Nature doesn't mince words.
@@professorakiba434 what makes you think humans can stop climate change with the carbon tax? We can't even get enough homes,doctors, nurses etc etc
In fact the carbon output has only gone up and people can't heat their homes or buy enough food etc etc.
@@-LightningRod- the only foolish people I've seen are the ones claiming the carbon will reduce carbon emissions and claim men can become women and women men.
and we have no ability to defend ourselves with that pop gun
Not so sure if the Canadian navy could deter the Russians or the chinese nowadays. Look at HMCS Margaret Brook, the latest patrol boat for the north, only a smaller cannon and a number of mounted machine guns on board. Diplomacy alone could only do so much.
It is a patrol vessel. Not a combat vessel.
@@kevin-yv1ig True but we have very few combat vessels capable of northern defence.
Bottom line we're a large unpopulated country that can't afford the cost of defence and annual maintenance of the country.
We need more people overall and way more people in the territories.
We need to get serious and more strategic about immigration to populate the north and increase our force.
Family reunification is nice but northern service and entrepreneurship is more useful.
@@IMGreg.. Which is why Canada is aquring type 26 frigates. while optimised differently at full load these will be about 9400 tons twice the sivze of our current frigates, about the same sive as the Russian flagship cruiser sunk in the Black Sea or a American Burke class destroyer. But first we need the ice breaking capacity which is why we are building two heavy ice breakers. The ice is still too thick for almost all nabal ships right now.
If we got the backing from NATO like Ukraine did, we could kick Russia's incompetent Navy and Military
Blind leading the blind, nato will help,lol. Maybe we need to start with learning the truth first instead of government propaganda. Independent journalists are a good start. You have been lied to about Ukraine, please research this for yourself. Patrick Lancaster or Eva Bartlett.
Shove your New Reality.
Stop being Stupid AND Foolish.
that ship is embarrassing
I wonder if a military career is an option for the half million over the next 3 years.
Not sure how much Canada can flex its' military mind. HMCS Harry DeWolf is out for mechanical issue. How can a patrol ship built in 2018 plagued with maintenance challenges?
Computer control systems
Don't know where your expert came from, but if Ukraine can make the Russian arm forces look like the boys scouts Canada doesn't need to worry
Solid . Very solid . Call the Inuit in . They weren·t scorned as badly as other tribes . Not everyone gets such a kind of second chance . If a missile gets through , it will very quickly concretize the reality of World War III as something that began when the post-Crimea and post-Belarus attacks on Poland and on North American infrastructure began . It·s time to work hand-in-hand with our American, Ukranian, and Scandinavian allies . And yes , the Inuit . They know the land best of all . Se
After seeing Russia's performance & equipment in Ukraine, we have nothing to worry about from them
Russia never went all out lol.. we wouldn’t stand a second
@@dom40864 the delusion is laughable. Russia never was an economic power, they always claimed to have those super weapon/vehicle when they only had the budget to build 10 that would get destroyed within a week, their training even pre war was laughable compared to western standards
What would be best is of Canada would secure the North through air bases and naval strike training. Its all we can afford and it will work,
How do you defend against hypersonic missiles?
Go Canada🤟
New Clear . . . . New Clear . . . . Nuclear . . . . . Say it . . . . New . . . . Clear . . . .That's Nuclear ! Now you've got it.
Canada may not know the waters of “our” Arctic, but you can be damn sure that China has mapped it out completely.
The Arctic patrol vessels can only patrol the “Arctic” for 3 or 4 months of the year. A horrible failure
Who in their right mind writes down a user account and password in clear text with a Sharpie, no less, for a control system of a Canadian naval vessel?
Are there zero security practices onboard?
2:19
Pretty sure it can't be accessed remotely
we must stop russian aggression
The claim that these new boats open up the artic to the Canadian Navy is technically true but the Canadian Coast guard has many Ice Breakers with more capability than these, In September of 1969 the Louis S. St-Laurent sailed on the SS Manhattan expedition in the Northwest Passage. so while these mild ice breakers can operate seasonably in the artic, they are not true artic vessels.
what an embarrassment the people of south provinces of Canada provides for the true north, our army, our people who live in the north no proper research in evolutionary infrastructure that could provide new lands to expand to or new ways to farm and make use of the Canadian shield. No green house farms or anything of note. There literally should be cities all over hudson bay all the way to the artic proper roads tunnels. Why have we not consider modern Zeppelins if roads are too expensive short multiple air fields for Zepplins would do wonders in cargo transport then using huge airbus or small propeller plans. Instead we get push around by the US, Russia and China. Its ridiculous As a child looking at maps I could plan out idea in business and map out possible transit roads for Canadas Upper north for a more prosperous north and country as a whole but citizens and government of Canada are too dumb too have foresight of the future
i think the germans are building huge modern wing in body flying cargo zeplins those would prob work good in the cold dense air in the artic?
Russian aggression? What did I miss? Your headlines just slay me. I read the headlines for fun now. Talk about click bait.
Well if you are denying that Russia has aims in the north and that we are not friends but bitter enemies and that our northern border is very frail and easily overcome by Russia at this point what you are saying suggests to me that you must be living with your head in the sand. Which caterpillar or flying pig did you consult when you tweeted this. Seems like you live totally in Looking Glass Land. Wonder if inflation even reaches there?
very nice timber to the narrators voice, definably native Canadian, would love to be able to slow down, like him. talk slowly, but with authority.....
*Whatever happened to "The coming ice age" of the 1970's?!*
That's why there are so many jets and bombers flying around👍🏼🤠🇺🇲🇨🇦🇺🇦
more wasting of resources and money. whatever, but piece. Russia moves infrastructure North, but it's ok for NATO to move East?
The Navy needs to be looking at Nuclear Attack Submarines that can operate there 365 days a year. The Conventional Attack Submarines can operate on the other two coast. It would only take a couple of Auste Submarines to patrol the entire Arctic. We would at least 6 to do the job with two on patrol, two on training to be the next on patrol and finally two under going maintenance and upgrades. At the same time we should be looking at upgrading the new 6 patrol boats. The Navy should also take possession of the two patrol boats currently going to the Coast Guard and upgrade them as well. That would bring the patrol boats to 8, 10 Submarines, and 15 new Type 26 ships. That will give us a massive upgraded Navy to serve all three coast...
In the late 80's we were looking at buying Trafalgar class subs. Our politicians scuttled it over costs, along with some nudging by the U.S.
It's not just the nuclear sub, there has to be a support infrastructure for the sub which is very expensive and probably not worth it for the number of subs Canada will likely get. Australia may be leasing their nuclear subs from the US, we should do the same.
The reason we need the nuclear submarines is they can be under the ice for long periods of time. In the case of the new British submarines the whole Canadian Arctic could be watched with two submarines. You just cannot do that with any other pieces of equipment...
@@davidgough4750 You need more than 2 subs. Subs require a lot of maintenance time in dock.
Yes we will need a minimum of 6 submarines as one set on patrol, one set in maintenance, and one set training to deploy next...
She is the Canadian Defense Minister😮
There is no such thing as NUCLEAR POWERED MISSILES ......nuclear armed ones are on both sides...
why dont you try googling that you might be surprised
🌹Happy Rememberance Day Kanata 🌹👍🏽🔥
Coming to an arctic near you
China and Russia watching this must be roaring laughing outloud.
16:25 she not assured
The Russian thread is real, however their capabilities are overrated as we learn daily from the Ukraine front reports . I do not want to know in what shape their submarine force is, they probably are grateful if the boat is not breaking appart.
They can open their Arctic waters to China, did you think about this? You want to see Chinese submarines in the Canadian North?
humans are not in charge of weather, how arrogant to promote the propaganda...
but but ,,,the man on tv told me that if i paid him lots of money he would change the weather???
Northern navies from...France? huh?
1 meter of ice ...lol
a real ice breaker for canaduh
What is Russia doing on that side.
Ice a meter thick? I thought it was a ice breaker???😂
Canada can develop our own nukes and nuclear submarines. Why can't we use these advantages to defend our northern territories.
Minister didn't answer any questions
4:40 Russia has Nuclear Powered Missiles ?
in the 50's the usa made nuke powered bomber that they test flew twice before grounding.then the "military intelligence" decided to make a nuke powered missle. kicker is they had no idea how to use it, basically in the end they decided it was best used by flying it appx 300ft above the ground over hostile territory setting every thing on fire in its path and spreading toxic radiation every where and then just criss crossing the area at supersonic speeds untill it ran out of fuel. fortunetly wiser heads prevailed and these silly prodjects were cancelled, putin has copied this idea tho. the usa still have appx 56 shouldler launchable mini nukes of 40 k ton yield these were to be carried on a 3 man jeep crews . fortuntly a smart general decided its best not to give these weapons to inexperience soildiers with 6 -8 weeks of basic trainning due to the risks grunts accidentally triggering a nuclear world war 3. Since then war criminal Obhama was suppose to dissassemble these as part of disarment treaties .Instead he spent the 50 million on new drone bases so he could bomb gas stations and wedding partys in the hopes of killing off terrorist ,insurgents, and the usual bad guys?
The ice needs freedom and tyran... democracy
Australia has Nuclear submarines and has a smaller population and GDP
More lies for the children and mentally infirm.
fk should rename these troops the donut force
some places benifit, great lakes area for one, others suffer, fires, floods, sorry for them, move
Now Canada must pay a price for it. instead of Alaska right? ahha
Canada has the second largest icebreaker fleet and now it is growing. Russia is failing in Ukraine. Hopefully this will not inhibit the development of our northern security when the money people look at our defence budget.
You need Israel for the new technology and the US.
A lot of Russian bots in the comments I see ...
waves hand ..these are not the russian bots you are seeking luke,,, use the force
Too bad the north and south poles are flipping 90° in about 2 decades give or take
Hello update
American artic Russia has a military base in the artic
"Okay Doomer."
Why would Russia care about Canada?
Why would Russia care about Ukraine?
ummm untapped natural resources maybe? strategic positioning?
@@badeggproductions9484 plus they have been talking about getting a foothold on north america. They hate the fact they sold alaska to usa
Resources. Territory. What do you think?. Do you live in a bubble or is that your head stuck in the sand.
@@mobo8933 even if they didnt they would probably lose it during the civil war cause we, the americans or british would've taken it or the white army would make a holdout there.
Be great to interview Eva Bartlett, Aaron Mate, Scott Ritter, Richard Medhurst, iEarlgrey, The Duran.
All of Putin's bootlickers.
They will never interview them, they go against the narrative because they speak the truth
help Ukraine to help you. Your defense line today is there
Canada’s defence is laughable at best. It’s shameful we can’t even defend our own sovereignty.
The arctic with Russian expansionism and aggression and chinas military increases and arctic ambitions and canada still refuses to properly Arm itself to protect what is canadian and refuses to accept help. No under ice surveillance or defense,, no nuclear ice breakers New indo Pacific pact with a very limited navy and airforce an refusel to purchase much needed weapons and equipment and refusal to host/ work together with us and uk and host/build strategic low yeild nuclear weapons and weapon systems.
Climate aggression
Russia should make a better offer to the three northter territory see what happen it cost the federal about six billions a years, if I was Russia I would make a better offer and see what happen.
You want to Stop the Russians with this 🤦 😂😊
New trade routes!
18 minutes of prop a gan da brought to you courtesy of the Canadian Taxpayers.
Canada MUST send heavily armed ships to protect OUR country. Any Russian vessels enter our waters should be treated as hostile and potentially a threat against NATO.
Bell end.
@@jimbojones101nah he's right
Can't agree anymore, man. Love this.😃
Our artic sovernty must never be questioned
Canadas navy is weak though
LOL, yeah, the weather is the fault of Russia.
So the idea is to force Canadian farmers to reduce food production to help the poor countries deal with storms?
@@punkinhootYou're exactly right. I worked in Kyrgyzstan. You could go camping on a nuclear waste dump, if you weren't careful.
Justin Trudeau training frontier frozen the sate of Texas January 2020 and 2021.
Don't forget racism and homophobia too.
🇷🇺 be afraid, very afraid ‼️
Enough with the Russophobia
Exactly. Russophobia must end by the destruction of Russia's military in the Ukraine. And the removal of Putin.
Glad to see i wasnt the only one thinking around while other news outlets dicked around with ukraine and the american vote
I just came here to laugh at the Doomer hysterics!
HOW IS ABSOLUTELY NO ONE TALKING ABOUT THE .5 SECOND STILL FRAME OF PYRAMIDS OR AZTEC TEMPLES IN THE ARCTIC?!
this region lays on the techtonic plate and continental shelf of russia so according to international law, historical presedents, and most other countrys consensus is not canadian territory. Even the usa doesnt recognize canadian claims here as well and often sends ship thru it with out permission to prove this point . this also explains why harper thought it most important to find evidence of the franklin expeidition to prop up canada's dubious historic claim to this area. . no mention of how if ice free this area would create a huge shipping corridor reducing travel distance thousands of miles, allowing ships to by pass the panama canal saving billions and reducing sea voyages by 14 days.- and potentially generating billions annualy in transit fees . no mention of the huge fish stocks , barely mentioned hydro carbons, no mention of other resources like minerals or gold. another flawed heavily biased report from a legacy media. If you want the real facts stop watching 2nd rate news outlets like this one.
Russie nithern help ya Ali As
Democrazy The Supreme. 🤣