How JAPAN is WINNING the 6th gen. FIGHTER race.

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 4 гру 2021
  • The race for the 6th generation fighter is on and there are 5 main participants: the two American NGADs, the European Tempest and FCAS, and then there is Godzilla!
    #6thGen #NGAD
    Join this channel to support it:
    / @millennium7historytech
    Support me on Patreon / millennium7
    One off donation with PayPal www.paypal.com/paypalme/Mille...
    Join the Discord server / discord
    ----------------------------
    Ask me anything!
    Take part to the community Q&A clicking the link below!
    forms.office.com/r/LNPQtf3Tc0
    --------------------
    Visit the subreddit!
    / millennium7lounge
    ---------------------
    All images and additional video segments contained in the Thumbnails and/or B-roll segments are used in strict compliance with the appropriate permissions and licenses required from the source and in accordance with the UA-cam Partner Program, Community guidelines & UA-cam terms of service.

КОМЕНТАРІ • 797

  • @Millennium7HistoryTech
    @Millennium7HistoryTech  2 роки тому +19

    Join this channel to support it:
    ua-cam.com/channels/VDkfkGRzo0qcZ8AkB4TMuw.htmljoin
    Support me on Patreon www.patreon.com/Millennium7
    One off donation with PayPal www.paypal.com/paypalme/Millennium7star
    Join the Discord server discord.gg/6CuWEWuhsk
    ----------------------------
    Ask me anything!
    Take part to the community Q&A clicking the link below!
    forms.office.com/r/LNPQtf3Tc0
    --------------------
    Visit the subreddit!
    www.reddit.com/r/Millennium7Lounge/

    • @amateurwizard
      @amateurwizard 2 роки тому

      Have you considered putting the audio versions of these on Google Podcasts, it's not a source of revenue per se but it's easy to do and I would listen to every episode. I spend a lot of time not able to consume information visually. Basically away from a charger with a phone and my batter would die 10x slower if it was just audio.

    • @amateurwizard
      @amateurwizard 2 роки тому

      @@joyalsajan1168 Every good pilot and politician knows that it's better to have both wings to fly this 'plane', not touching but not too far apart.

    • @manofsan
      @manofsan 2 роки тому

      Plasma screen? I thought OLED had won the race! ;p

    • @joyalsajan1168
      @joyalsajan1168 2 роки тому

      @@amateurwizard 🙄🙄🙄🙄What do you want ,tea or coffee for such wonderful answer???🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣.

    • @randyross5630
      @randyross5630 2 роки тому

      You are such an Idiot! The US is working on a 6th Gen Fighter, everyone else is doing 5th Gen or Gen 4++, get the Huck Out of Here with your Foreign Propaganda!!!

  • @christianm1533
    @christianm1533 2 роки тому +233

    Psst. 6:th gen. I'm building a 9:th generation in my garage. Whatever gen somebody else is building I'll add three and have an automatic win!

    • @nattygsbord
      @nattygsbord 2 роки тому +6

      Pfff... F35 is the mother of all planes. Its totally perfect. And no plane can be more perfect than perfection itself.

    • @burnerjack01
      @burnerjack01 2 роки тому +16

      Well, as my old service manager Frank (USMC) used to say (about the engineering dept.),
      "Anybody can draw an asshole, but the trick is to make it shit."

    • @mikeholloway2625
      @mikeholloway2625 2 роки тому +4

      Psst... I am building an Earth to Orbit Fighter Bomber in my back yard.

    • @daveanthonysalalima1128
      @daveanthonysalalima1128 2 роки тому +3

      Its perfect because it is made in USA!..haha

    • @francojustthat156
      @francojustthat156 2 роки тому

      😂🤣

  • @peterc3143
    @peterc3143 2 роки тому +14

    The Japanese are a very clever people.
    Never underestimate them.

    • @michaelharrington6698
      @michaelharrington6698 Рік тому

      Good point, betcha it would be a world war if they ever went for world domination

    • @user-ud1dh7db9v
      @user-ud1dh7db9v 6 місяців тому

      yo becom doctor!! come back when doctor

    • @The_ZeroLine
      @The_ZeroLine 6 місяців тому +1

      Their top value, when thinking in terms of allied efforts, is that they think and approach problems in a very different way from the West. And that can only be a good thing.

  • @ELMS
    @ELMS 2 роки тому +15

    Where else could I go for a concise briefing on the Japanese 6th Gen fighter? You really are producing content that isn’t found anywhere else. Excellent! Keep it up!

  • @Glen.Danielsen
    @Glen.Danielsen 2 роки тому +8

    I cannot resist subscribing to this marvelous channel. It is excellence! I love your honesty, candor, and clarity of information. 💛🙏🏼

  • @mcal27
    @mcal27 2 роки тому +187

    Good for Japan! If they just allow themselves to be simply a client-state and do not use the abilities the country has they will end up as another Canada..militarily.. I was impressed by their previous leader Abe, who took it upon himself to plow a more independent foreign policy within what was possible.

    • @peekaboopeekaboo1165
      @peekaboopeekaboo1165 2 роки тому +5

      Yet another American anti-Chinese stooges.

    • @thomaszhang3101
      @thomaszhang3101 2 роки тому +35

      Japan had been very smart with its geopolitics. By supporting Taiwan, it can further increase Taiwan’s confidence to standup to China, making a China-US conflict more likely.
      The mere threat of conflict itself will allow Japan to legitimately tear down the constitution that limited its military since WWII and begin rearming.
      If China loses, Japan replaces it as the dominant Asian power; if America loses, American troops pull out of Asia and Japan gains its independence from America. Win win

    • @peekaboopeekaboo1165
      @peekaboopeekaboo1165 2 роки тому +12

      @@thomaszhang3101
      Wrong. US has no intention of pulling out it's military in the Asia-Pacific.

    • @thomaszhang3101
      @thomaszhang3101 2 роки тому +17

      @@peekaboopeekaboo1165 if America loses against China they will have to pull out. It’s the norm throughout history, even as recent as WWI and WWII.

    • @zwen3763
      @zwen3763 2 роки тому +24

      Won't happen. Japan is in a worse state then Canada already. They are basically a modern colony of the US. If the project goes well the US will force their way in AKA "joint development", get the tech then sabotage the project. In the 80s Japan was the leading semiconductor producer, they had their own plan of developing its indigenous fighter jet. Then it was the Toshiba scandal, Japan was forced to transfer technology to the US, and let them join the fighter jet project. The rest is history.

  • @Pincer88
    @Pincer88 2 роки тому +96

    Wow! The Japanese certainly impress. They already did with the indigenous P-1 maritime patrol aircraft and C-2 transporter, but this is quite a step up.
    If I remember correctly, I recall reading in 2013 that Eurojet was researching a TVC version of the EJ-200 engine as well. The reasons given for TVC control were that 1. using thrust vectoring instead of control surfaces increased efficiency at higher speeds and 2. reduced radar signature. I don't know if that is correct, but those were the arguments.
    Great video, as always.

    • @BulletproofPastor
      @BulletproofPastor 2 роки тому +3

      Next week China will claim to have a 12th generation fighter, "currently in testing." As always, just propaganda. Case in point: their new aircraft carriers are sitting empty because they don't have enough carrier fighters. In Japan's defense, they have a good track record of backing up their claims.

    • @jacobbaumgardner3406
      @jacobbaumgardner3406 2 роки тому +2

      The Europeans will never fit the EJ2(3/7)0 because what they have is enough for now to them. It's unfortunate but is what it is. I'm glad Japan has caught up.

    • @iaminpain8407
      @iaminpain8407 2 роки тому

      to be honest the new japan 6th gen fighter looks a lot like the nosferatu

    • @jcgongavoe337
      @jcgongavoe337 2 роки тому +1

      @@BulletproofPastor ok boomer

  • @ghostmourn
    @ghostmourn 2 роки тому +32

    like Elon says 'Prototypes are easy, production is hard' but the Japanese are excellent at production and I wish them well. The USA, Russia and others have long spiral development programs which is a big advantage but we also get comfortable doing things a certain way. Sometimes a fresh start can shake things up in the right way.

    • @castlekingside76
      @castlekingside76 Рік тому +2

      Elon is good, Japan is beyond him. They are closer to Krypton than Earrh.

    • @castlekingside76
      @castlekingside76 Рік тому +2

      You snd I both know that Japan could build the best of everything if they wanted. They are still strong enough to take on China

    • @DAAllan82
      @DAAllan82 Місяць тому

      @@castlekingside76 They really couldn't. I don't think you quite grasp the technological advantage the US has, much less the institutional knowledge and experience, in everything from materials science to engine manufacturing, to sensors, to targeting systems, and on and on.
      This idea that any country "could" do something better but simply chooses not to is fantasy world thinking. They don't because they can't. If they could, they would. And the military aerospace industry is the most difficult, highest barrier to entry industry there is.
      No one is catching the US any time soon. Not only is everyone playing catch up, but they're playing catchup against a country that spends multiple times more money than they do. The gulf is widening, not shrinking.

  • @coltsinglearmy
    @coltsinglearmy 2 роки тому +1

    I love the quality and humor in all of your videos! Thank you for the good times!

  • @teddy.d174
    @teddy.d174 2 роки тому

    Another stellar video! Your information is unrivaled and your channel has quickly become one of my favorites…as well as a go to for correct, honest, unbiased reporting. I always look forward to your next topic/video.

  • @GarfieldRex
    @GarfieldRex 2 роки тому +3

    Never thought to find another great aviation channel. Very well done in all videos! 👌

  • @phelansa23
    @phelansa23 2 роки тому +1

    Very informative as always!

  • @sumitarya6065
    @sumitarya6065 2 роки тому +2

    Lovely video, very informative. Keep this up sir.

  • @JagdgeschwaderX
    @JagdgeschwaderX 2 роки тому +1

    Thank you for all of your videos, they are brilliant. I would love more information about modern ECM and Radar.

  • @AACW_77
    @AACW_77 2 роки тому +1

    Great resume, pictures, videos, and some good humor. congratulations, subscribing now, thank you.

  • @tinolino58
    @tinolino58 2 роки тому +4

    As a pilot I love your videos very much!

  • @greatgandalf5233
    @greatgandalf5233 2 роки тому

    Great video!

  • @pilgrim8610
    @pilgrim8610 2 роки тому

    as always very unique video personaly cant find anywhere else... thanks alot maestro....🙏🙏🙏

    • @Millennium7HistoryTech
      @Millennium7HistoryTech  2 роки тому

      Thinking that it is always information available on books, reviews or the Internet, it is quite strange that nobody else does a similar job.

  • @anirbande7893
    @anirbande7893 2 роки тому

    Hey, you finally made a video on the Shin-shin. Thanks a lot!👍

  • @andymavridis3588
    @andymavridis3588 2 роки тому

    Man! Another very professional informative vid that pays tribute to aviation science. THANK YOU! (as the vid is about JSDAF...) Domo arigato gozaimasu!

  • @carldavies4776
    @carldavies4776 2 роки тому

    More new knowledge....love this channel

  • @bikenavbm1229
    @bikenavbm1229 2 роки тому

    always facinating thanks

  • @darveshzamindar
    @darveshzamindar 2 роки тому

    After a long time , a really interesting video. 👍

  • @OXYOXYOXY444
    @OXYOXYOXY444 2 роки тому

    love your show , you rock

  • @juanar4305
    @juanar4305 2 роки тому +4

    8:49 About side note:
    The plasma does not reflect radar waves but is itself an emitter of electromagnetic signals at all frequencies, which would transform the aircraft into a flying Christmas tree.
    Same problem for hypersonic missiles.

    • @jc.1191
      @jc.1191 2 роки тому

      I wasn't aware of that with hypersonic missiles. Interesting to know.

  • @dushman888
    @dushman888 2 роки тому

    Well done!

  • @vishvajitkumar9497
    @vishvajitkumar9497 2 роки тому

    very informative video.

  • @cannonfodder4376
    @cannonfodder4376 2 роки тому +14

    An informative video on what has become a very interesting aircraft project. In a time where Vipers or F-35's are simply proliferating everywhere, its nice to see indigenous projects getting into gear. Having read a little bit about the problems in regards to F-2 development, the Japanese are right to go domestic as much as possible.
    An informative summary on an interesting project.

  • @Elysian_Angel_
    @Elysian_Angel_ 2 роки тому

    Thank you! 🙏

  • @The_ZeroLine
    @The_ZeroLine 6 місяців тому

    Excellent stuff. Only person I’ve seen doing more than a very superficial analysis of Japan’s program. I’m sure there is, but I haven’t come across it yet. When I saw that engine image, I thought that looks miniaturized and then I saw your slim engine headline.

    • @Millennium7HistoryTech
      @Millennium7HistoryTech  6 місяців тому

      This is outdated now since Japan joined the GCAP program with UK and Italy

  • @vickykamone928
    @vickykamone928 2 роки тому

    Informational episode sir😃

  • @vickydroid
    @vickydroid 2 роки тому +11

    Wow, so much to digest, probably the idea of Otis getting excited by the microwave technology was funniest but the idea of directed energy defensive systems and funky slim engines gives food for thought, although the benefits of output per cm2 sectional area might not be as clear cut unless you're comparing podded engines. Can wait to see when the first planes fly and what systems prevail.

  • @davidhughes4089
    @davidhughes4089 2 роки тому +8

    Underestimate the Japanese at your peril - they don't shout about things like the US or Russians but they never disappoint. Good to see UK/JP cooperation 🇬🇧🇯🇵

    • @notafrog2040
      @notafrog2040 Рік тому +1

      yeha but why does the Mitsubishi F-1 that was equipped with all aspect Aim-9L and was used up until 2006, HAVE NO FLARES WTF

    • @davidhughes4089
      @davidhughes4089 Рік тому +1

      @@notafrog2040 it's that Kamikaze rizz

  • @lenoakes2450
    @lenoakes2450 2 роки тому

    Tremendous!!!

  • @dl6519
    @dl6519 2 роки тому

    Fantastic video! Thank you!! (For future reference: ceramic = "SIR-am-ick").
    Any chance of a future video on maritime patrol aircraft?

    • @amniote69
      @amniote69 2 роки тому +1

      Surely "sir-AM-ik"?

    • @dl6519
      @dl6519 2 роки тому

      @@amniote69 You are absolutely right, thanks! I had the accent on the wrong sil-AH-bl.

  • @knightonwarbeck1969
    @knightonwarbeck1969 2 роки тому +25

    Hello from Western Canada. I would like you to talk hypothetically, about how countries looking for an F-22 type fighter, should come together to revive the YF-23. Include costs, tooling, build, and development time, and what improvements could be made i.e. what avionics/weapon systems/engines etc... should be used. Is this a fairly "simple" process or would it cost more than purchasing a "ready to go" fighter? How would this benefit each country? Thank you for the great videos and channel thus far. Truly original content you provide.

    • @carlosandleon
      @carlosandleon 2 роки тому +3

      YF- 23 is ridiculously overrated. But I guess could be a good platform to build on.

    • @burnerjack01
      @burnerjack01 2 роки тому +10

      @@carlosandleon I've read that it was superior to the F-22, but it was a farther departure from the 'tried and true', therefore, posed more of a risk. There may be some truth in that. As we've seen, even the more 'conservative approach' i.e. the F-22 had plenty of teething pains.

    • @carlosandleon
      @carlosandleon 2 роки тому +8

      @@burnerjack01 aside from longer range and marginally better stealth profile, the yf23 was inferior in almost all regards.
      Top Speed is estimated to be more than Mach 2, the F22 already does this anyway.
      It's slightly less maneuverable.
      It has less space for ordinance. And if they ever wanted to fit as much missiles as was required, they would have had to make the airframe longer to accomodate this. The implications of doing so is not insignificant.
      I get that there is a cult following and appreciation for this aircraft. I can respect that.
      But the F22 was arguably the better decision.

    • @cicaklaut
      @cicaklaut 2 роки тому

      How serious are Western Canadians with seceding out of Ontario & French Canada?

    • @thelordofcringe
      @thelordofcringe 2 роки тому +2

      @@burnerjack01 one problem is the prototypes were essentially handmade and the company lied about having the ability to actually produce them in any serious numbers. It would have been years and years behind schedule, or instead would have had to be manufactured more simply and lose some of its stealth capability, either way now being inferior to the f22.

  • @volkanmanga5406
    @volkanmanga5406 10 місяців тому

    Fantastic work thank you! Can you also review KF21 & TFX at some point?

  • @MM-wt2oo
    @MM-wt2oo 2 роки тому +2

    I am most excited abt the Tempest. Also looking to see what Chinese bring to the table in future.

  • @bastadimasta
    @bastadimasta 2 роки тому +5

    11:42 Don't worry about it. All slim engines are designed by thick engineers.

  • @howardroark7726
    @howardroark7726 2 роки тому

    Awesome 👍

  • @jc.1191
    @jc.1191 2 роки тому +2

    I'm not sure that's the best use of limited funding vs say hypersonic missiles or just f15ex. But wish them much luck, it would be a helpful addition to defense. Hopefully the rolls Royce choice works out considering financial difficulty.

  • @fuzinonzlot
    @fuzinonzlot Рік тому +1

    Can't wait til they unveil the final product!

  • @StereoSpace
    @StereoSpace 2 роки тому +2

    One thing not mentioned: On the American side, they recall a Japanese contractor, entrusted with secret software for milling and grinding large quiet submarine propellers, sold that software to the Russians. So, when it came time to entrust the F-22 to Japan, legislators (rightly or wrongly) recalled that incident and decided to prohibit transfer of that tech to anyone.

  • @Ni999
    @Ni999 2 роки тому

    Outstanding episode. 👍
    If you need Gojira to fill in for the elephant in the room someday, you may get inspiration from Bambi Meets Godzilla (1969), available on UA-cam. 😀

  • @cliffordterry2133
    @cliffordterry2133 2 роки тому +2

    As usual, a very informative video which is much appreciated. I do have one question, though. Why is the picture that displays an aircraft that we assume is the aircraft being discussed being displayed, apparently by Korea? The Korean flags are there, a Korean flag emblem is painted on the aircraft, and the words across the screen are Korean. for a KF-21.

  • @amenboughanmi5819
    @amenboughanmi5819 2 роки тому +3

    Japanese created the AESA radar and the first aircraft to function it is the F2

    • @w47w
      @w47w 25 днів тому

      The Aesa Radar was developed by EU Euroradar Captor for Eurofighter! They are leading in this area. That was in 2002. It is based on the ECR Tornado Jet System Anti-Radar-Air-Air-Air Rakets. At that time he was the only jet that could.
      The Americans then also took over the system for themselves.
      The inventor of Radar 1896 was Heinrich Hertz a German.
      FRG is in this area worldwide. Hensoldt is the absolute top here! They were there at Aesa Radar Development. You have also developed the passive Radar Twinixx where Stealth Fighter tracks down without any problems. Test are currently running with Irist and passive radar. Meteor and later Eurofighter will also get it. The United States wants to equip its new F15 EX with the Eurofighter system. F22 is then no longer required.
      The USA has founded a cooperation company with FRG/ Hensoldt. FRG had to give her approval beforehand because she is right.
      You can google everything before writing false things.

  • @theredbar-cross8515
    @theredbar-cross8515 2 роки тому +22

    You've forgotten the rather HUGE caveat that Japan is legally barred from exporting military hardware. So whatever they R&D for this native 6th Gen jet, they will not be able to recoup the cost through exports.
    This is why every piece of Japanese native hardware is crazy expensive: native R&D and small production quantities = super high per unit costs.

    • @bastadimasta
      @bastadimasta 2 роки тому +14

      Fortunately, Japan can export self defense equipment.

    • @FaizalMohdMustapa
      @FaizalMohdMustapa 2 роки тому +2

      they are capable now after reinterpreting their constitution again. they had jafterall try to sell the frigates to indonesia & submarine to australia.

    • @carlosandleon
      @carlosandleon 2 роки тому +1

      @@bastadimasta Hehehe

    • @joeclaridy
      @joeclaridy 2 роки тому +3

      Japanese arms limitations were largely self imposed and if put into a difficult position Japan could lift those limitations.

    • @PrograError
      @PrograError 2 роки тому

      @@joeclaridy that and citizen sentiments... (most still don't look at militarisation too fondly, maybe with a war incoming it would 360)

  • @chris929rr7
    @chris929rr7 Рік тому

    FCAS looks amazing OMG!

  • @gomezgomez6299
    @gomezgomez6299 2 роки тому

    Great analysis ( like always) !
    May i ask where are you from? Thanks

  • @JessicaSeverin
    @JessicaSeverin 2 роки тому +14

    excellent video. I live in Japan and have been following the progress of FX since ShinShin flew in 2016. And I agree the IHI XF9 engine is amazing. Knowing how Japanese do things, the XF9 test power of 107KN dry/147KN wet was probably conservative and the final engine will be able to do more. And since Japan was the first country to field an AESA radar on a plane, I'm looking forward to what they will create for FX. I also suspect by the time FX becomes operational that the Japanese constitution for weapon export will be amended. Abe was trying very hard to change it but didn't have enough support, but I think in a few years they will be able to make the change.

    • @JessicaSeverin
      @JessicaSeverin 2 роки тому +3

      this video on the XF9 is really excellent. ua-cam.com/video/qjoRpEixF1Q/v-deo.html

    • @jonlaurenzreyes1902
      @jonlaurenzreyes1902 2 роки тому +5

      They already lifted the military export ban. Japan already offered the soryu class submarine to Australia, Mogami class stealth frigate to Indonesia, and S-band radar to the Philippines

    • @lagrangewei
      @lagrangewei 2 роки тому

      japan cannot export plane not because of the constitution, but because country buy plane as a form of alliance since you are buying them with intend of lifetime servicing, why buy from japan when japan cannot protect you? japan doesn't have the power projection of us, france, russia or china. that is the real problem, not some domestic law.

    • @JessicaSeverin
      @JessicaSeverin 2 роки тому

      you are right, I was confusing the recent constiutional reform attempts to remove the "only self defense" restrictions on the JSDF with the older laws which prevented weapons export (reformed in 2014)

    • @M16_Akula-III
      @M16_Akula-III 2 роки тому

      @@lagrangewei Russia doesn't do power projection man.... And it's not about Japan protecting other countries. You don't always buy things for lifetime servicing.

  • @dejvi5711
    @dejvi5711 2 роки тому +17

    So the 5th generation planes do not meet the needs of their countries, so they hurried to make the 6th generation plane as soon as possible. And there is so much talk about the possibilities of the 5th generation and so much marketing and the chase around it.

    • @joelau2383
      @joelau2383 2 роки тому +2

      Actually, many components and features in the description of Japanese domestic 6th gen fighter was part of the Japanese domestic 5th gen fighter. So it may be simply a rename of domestic 5th gen fighter project.

    • @dejvi5711
      @dejvi5711 2 роки тому +2

      @@joelau2383 Although Japan has an expensive F-35, the jury is making the 6th generation aircraft. Why the Americans are in a hurry, with huge investments since the F-117 era. Ok for the French, the Germans, the Swedes, the British, but for the Americans it is very strange to me and we know how much money they spent on the development of the F-35. After all, that Japanese Godzilla will be a very expensive plane without any possibility for export. In addition to the price, the components imported for that aircraft also play a role, such as the F-35 radar. This happens with the Gripen wherever they had a customer they had to ask the Americans if they could sell the plane because it uses their engines. This happened with the Israeli F-16 that was supposed to be sold to Croatia, regardless of the fact that it was bought from Israel, there is no possibility of selling it without the consent of the United States.

    • @atlet1
      @atlet1 2 роки тому +1

      @@dejvi5711 they will probably build it with easy upgrade technology, as in Gripen. That make a USA ban possible to neglect by changing components to another manufacturer.

    • @dejvi5711
      @dejvi5711 2 роки тому +1

      @@atlet1 You may be right Arne, but the picture of Godzilla with 2 engines looks like a big plane, and we know how expensive the twin-engine western planes F-22, F-15EX, Typhoon, Rafael are. The French have signed a $ 19 billion contract with the UAE for 80 planes and 10 helicopters, the numbers are huge. Each new generation of aircraft is getting more and more expensive, I have no doubt that the 6th will reduce development and production costs.

    • @arkadious9320
      @arkadious9320 2 роки тому +2

      @@dejvi5711 Hurried? The F22 is 25 yrs old and the F35 is 15. . tech changes fast. By 2030 (approx time of new 6th gen release) the advantage is not as much as it was. . this is normal.

  • @lohikarhu734
    @lohikarhu734 2 роки тому

    With full integration of systems *across* platforms, it's possible to integrate sensors that have a very large effective aperture, and can be actively steered, simultaneously, across several 'vehicles', providing more capability in resolution and total power output, an architecture that could also support simultaneous operation of multiple directed-energy weapons, whether for ECM or actual destruction of aircraft, ground systems/weapons, or distant line-of-sight threats (satellites? Since the Putin boys are working on anti-satellite weaponry) Hmmmm, possibly useful, with the kind of power and agility of multi-platform synchronization, even inbound space-based "Hypersonic" weapons.... just a thought

  • @SanctuaryLife
    @SanctuaryLife 2 роки тому

    As an old electronic warfare analyst for the Navy you’re saying it isn’t glamorous!

  • @trevorhart545
    @trevorhart545 2 роки тому +2

    Q. What about the discussions with the UK/BAe about merging with the Tempest II and creating a joint development with Italy, Sweden and the UK? There is also talk of Spain, Canada and Australia joining the project.

    • @Millennium7HistoryTech
      @Millennium7HistoryTech  2 роки тому

      While it is reasonable for F-X and Tempest to share some technologies, I think there is zero probability to merge Tempest and FCAS. Italy could be forced to leave the Tempest and join the FCAS because my native country is ...

    • @bigjo66
      @bigjo66 2 роки тому

      @@Millennium7HistoryTech Sounds like you think Tempest is a better option for Italy than FCAS? Do we really know enough about the two options to compare? Or do you think that Italy would retain more influence by staying part of Tempest?

  • @kathrynck
    @kathrynck 2 роки тому +18

    I've thought for some time now that Japan & the US are the main front runners for 6th gen.
    Initially I didn't think so, because I thought their test plane (the X-2) was a prototype, and really the X-2 is kind of a really fancy F-5. But once I realized that was just a technology testbed, and I read a bit more ...yeah Japan's approaching the program very well.
    6 "medium-large" munitions probably means up to Sparrow (AIM-7) or 1000 lb bomb size. Meteor, HARM, maybe harpoon, stuff like that.
    It's possible that they mean 6 medium, with enough bay depth to allow for 4 large munitions instead.
    Miniaturizing the internal components as much as possible also has benefits beyond space constraints in a stealth platform. Namely, less weight. And lower weight means less wing loading at a given amount of drag, or less drag (engineer's choice).
    196Kn = 44,000 lbs thrust wet (as a goal anyway). In a twin engine fighter, that would be more thrust than any fighter aircraft produced anywhere to date. Low bypass means somewhat smaller intakes & ducting, and less drag. They're favoring a high supercruise capability, at the expense of fuel economy & IR stealth. Although a high supercruise can recoup a lot of fuel economy. But it will run hot.
    Their program prioritizes range, speed, altitude, maneuverability, and radar stealth (in roughly that order) with IR stealth being sacrificed to the speed gods. And it's going to be a pretty big plane. In many ways it's an ideal counterpart to the 150 F-35's they've already bought (rather than competing with it in the same performance envelopes).
    Basically Japan wants a Firefox (with some F-35 toolkit thrown in).

    • @daggerin4life726
      @daggerin4life726 2 роки тому

      US 🤣 is Bankrupt country facing internal descent that lies right beneath the surface like( Super Valcano) not if but when it will erupt is matter time..... YEAH

    • @blvck.8197
      @blvck.8197 2 роки тому +1

      @@daggerin4life726 bruh what?

  • @ajay262134
    @ajay262134 2 роки тому +1

    It's not a plane, it's a time machine.

  • @Kenny-yl9pc
    @Kenny-yl9pc 2 роки тому +3

    very impressive! I hope they are successful and that they create a beautiful and powerful 6th gen fighter jet that is superior compared to their adversaries.

  • @user-gv8xk6tj8h
    @user-gv8xk6tj8h 2 роки тому

    Recipe: put in bowl oatmeal ,salt ,little sugar,flour ,cram,yeast ,to cover in beer.
    Mix to thin dough .
    Leavening agent ,1 hour (in warm place).To pour in baking dish (as 🍕baking paper +oil ).To put slice of tomato and black pepper ,addition to slice hard cheese . Bake in hat oven ,until is light brown

  • @pitbulkid
    @pitbulkid 2 роки тому +2

    wait till you see them release Deathsythe, Shenlong, Sandrock, HeavyArms and Wing 0 mobile suit gundams

  • @marksanney2088
    @marksanney2088 2 роки тому

    Thank you for another interesting video, my friend.
    It sounds as though the Japanese are pursuing a potentially outstanding aircraft.

  • @markwoods4574
    @markwoods4574 2 роки тому +3

    I heard that Japan was entering into the Tempest program ? Because those dates you’ve mentioned are practically the same ones as the Tempest Fighter Jet plus all of the ideas for the Japanese jet are similar to the Tempest so far .

    • @PrograError
      @PrograError 2 роки тому

      could be the JPN government not putting all the eggs in the same basket? had a feeling maybe they are sharing some "toollings" and spare parts while making their own

    • @piotrd.4850
      @piotrd.4850 2 роки тому

      @@PrograError Basically it could be Tempest as "low" - replacement of F-2 and this new aircraft as "High" - replaement of F-15J.

  • @GreenBlueWalkthrough
    @GreenBlueWalkthrough 2 роки тому +1

    Aounds really good and I only knew they where making one but did not no it was this far along! it sound more up my ally then the USAF all of the stealth Gen 6! Which I've heard it has flown already thanks to AI and super compuuter added repid development... So it will be a race between Japan and the US to first active gen 6. Also they should keep godzella as it fits this platform being the first demestic air supoirity fighter after the Zero family in WW2. And much like the Kanju, the plane rises from the ashes of the atomic bombs.

    • @PrograError
      @PrograError 2 роки тому

      but... but... the waifu mascots... (japan loves their mascots... but waifu mascot earns from the weebs)

  • @ariaparsi001
    @ariaparsi001 2 роки тому +1

    NEW SUB ARIA

  • @Stray_Cafe
    @Stray_Cafe 2 роки тому +6

    This video is basically almost 2 years ago of rumor level info in Japan.
    4:53 Not hihi, 'Ai-Eightch-Ai
    5:06 Not engine, it's engine's sub system. UK is officially announcing, the mutual cooperation in very much minor part. Your video is wrong.
    Why RR became a partner? Because RR also wants use IHI's technology. Both has long relationship in this business.
    8:50 Plasma isn't be used in radar or something like beam weapon like previous Sukhoi's plan.
    XF9-1 also technology demonstration, same as ATD-X.

  • @myusername3689
    @myusername3689 2 роки тому +1

    I wonder if we’ll see a very early pre production prototype of any 6th gen fighter in 2022 or 2024.

  • @Bakotcha
    @Bakotcha 2 роки тому +1

    Able to store large weapons eh, I can imagine this thing being used as a Naval Strike Aircraft if it could carry ASM.

  • @vdotme
    @vdotme 2 роки тому

    11:40 - Bruh, you're a fool for that 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣. I share your struggle.

  • @bradleys6466
    @bradleys6466 2 роки тому +3

    The japanese Viper looks amazing..
    The reality of 6th Gen and beyond is going to be based more around software defined systems than hardware. And it goes without saying, even though @mover doesn't like it.. yes Drones will take the major role when it comes to attack forces. Most "Eyes in the sky" will be AWACS with the ability to deploy / control systems.
    6th generation weapons will be more around doing things like EMP's to take out defense tech and to make more easily for traditional large format bombers to come in and devastate.

  • @gagongflip389
    @gagongflip389 2 роки тому +1

    That 6th gen is going to turn into a robot.

  • @John.Greyman
    @John.Greyman 2 роки тому

    The thrust vectoring may be necessary due to directioning of energy weapons.

  • @chumleyk
    @chumleyk 5 місяців тому +1

    Japan and UK are now merging efforts.

  • @tuahsakato17
    @tuahsakato17 2 роки тому

    Ishikawajima-Harima engine sounds dope, like something would come from some Mecha Anime lmao

  • @henkvandenheuvel9543
    @henkvandenheuvel9543 2 роки тому

    Bedankt

  • @nickad55
    @nickad55 2 роки тому

    thank you,What or how is service ceiling determinded

  • @atomicvortex6071
    @atomicvortex6071 2 роки тому +1

    It would be pretty funny if Japan uses Ace Combat Original Aircraft as their 6th Gen Aircraft and it could work surprisingly well since they do have technology to do

  • @mattg1094
    @mattg1094 2 роки тому +1

    Hell yeah Japan! Time for the Gundam to be realized!,

  • @fredmdbud
    @fredmdbud 2 роки тому +1

    I award this video the "Pierre Sprey Precog Award" for prophecy - but without the swimming pool and the creepy attendant.

  • @exponentmantissa5598
    @exponentmantissa5598 2 роки тому

    I heard there are plans to incorporate the Illudium Q-36 Explosive Space Modulator into the airframe.

    • @garynew9637
      @garynew9637 9 місяців тому

      In conjunction with the turbo encapsulator assisted by fungiumferfboxes.

  • @adriantataru7476
    @adriantataru7476 Рік тому +1

    Just a question . do you think the engines will be enaugh for the plane to get in hypersonc speeds ???? me for one i dont thinck so ...and yes i thinck ceramics is a very good ideea as solution to and protect the struture from heat ...i am just baffled that noone tghot of that till now is common knowlidge the use of ceramics to contain heat transmitions .....

  • @watcherzero5256
    @watcherzero5256 2 роки тому

    Its looking a lot like Tempest and F-X will be sister aircraft, a lot of joint work going on between UK and Japan involving Air-to-Air missiles, engines, engine related airframe components and the offensive use of radar. They appear also to be jettisoning the prototype engine they have already developed and going with a Rolls Royce one (perhaps there were performance issues) though talk is some of the materials developed for their own will work their way into the common design.

    • @Stray_Cafe
      @Stray_Cafe 2 роки тому +2

      No, the XF9-1 system based engine is going to be adopted in the 1st prototype, at least. The F-X's engine will be developed according to the all requirements. The new engine(RR&IHI) will never be a common engine for both program, it's a joint development for new engine technology, not a prototype engine. These couple of program's requirements aren't same as can integrate to one, will have similar mechanisms at several subsystems only, engines also will have a mixture of each other's specialties.

    • @watcherzero5256
      @watcherzero5256 2 роки тому

      @@Stray_Cafe It might well work its way into the first prototype as its already been tested and so is ready, however Japan has signed on to produce a common testbed for the two fighters with a target of completion in 2025 and flight testing in 2027. As it has already has a testbed for its XF9 engines for three years it doesnt need to design and build another one unless its changed it mind on using them.

  • @edisonone
    @edisonone 2 роки тому +1

    .
    Oh yeah, Japan da’mun, Man!!! Another flying Tesla by Toyota and Honda if Japan! Cool as always Man!

  • @SandiegoRockstar
    @SandiegoRockstar 2 роки тому +1

    In geostrategic terms, it would make sense for Japan to partner with Turkey on aerospace. Both lack UN veto power and live under the threat of their Russian neighbour. This combination allows the US to employ leverage against them. Which make them both desperately in need of indigenous defense solutions, especially in the high tech area of aerospace. And so it's no surprise both have ambitious aerospace programs. In these programs, Turkey has mainly struggled with power plants but has punched above it's weight in drone technology. Meanwhile Japan seems to be nailing the powerplant game but doesn't seem to have much drone technology. That might be a perfect match for defense tech cooperation.

    • @djl5634
      @djl5634 2 роки тому +1

      Well USA aerospace are working with Japan to build this aircraft. Same with south Koreas 5th gen aircraft

  • @SpartanONegative
    @SpartanONegative 2 роки тому

    Ill take one 🤠

  • @GSteel-rh9iu
    @GSteel-rh9iu Рік тому

    Again an excellent summary. The Japanese government balked at the $40billion possible price tag back in 2014; maybe they got over that barrier. I hope they really build this in partnership with BAE, Leonardo and possibly SAAB. However if the Mitsubishi SpaceJet project is any metric there are many project risks we don't know about. Of the partners only SAAB has produced a current and excellent fighter; maybe they should be project lead?

  • @valenrn8657
    @valenrn8657 2 роки тому

    That's a 5th gen shape when USAF's NGAD is designed for longer wavelength radar.

  • @tigoes
    @tigoes 5 місяців тому

    Here is how i see a decent 6-gen fighter:
    - supercruise at hypersonic
    - 20+g manouvers
    - unmaned
    - landing in low earth orbit (no need for earth airfields nor carriers)
    - railguns fireing hypersonic guide prohectiles
    - about 50m in length
    - fly by AI

  • @edisonone
    @edisonone 2 роки тому +1

    Right!

  • @rinsatomi9527
    @rinsatomi9527 2 роки тому

    Could you maybe talk a little about plasma antennas?

  • @brettduffin8412
    @brettduffin8412 2 роки тому +1

    Was named Godzilla due to its mythical nature.

  • @JainZar1
    @JainZar1 2 роки тому

    For a regional superpower, like the JSDF wants to be, a shorter range but higher performance might prove useful.

    • @thh4584
      @thh4584 2 роки тому

      Hence it's focus on territorial defense.

  • @crumcon
    @crumcon 2 роки тому +3

    This keeps remind me that YF-23 was 40-50 years ahead of its time!

    • @ronmaximilian6953
      @ronmaximilian6953 2 роки тому +5

      No, it wasn't. The F-22 was a more conservative design. That doesn't mean that the F-23 was decades ahead. Also, the f-23 would have had major teething problems with its internal weapons bays

  • @alexanbreizh6337
    @alexanbreizh6337 2 роки тому +1

    Does those 6th gen platforms should be multirole? I mean does they have to be able to carry all kind of weapons if they have some kind of armed drone wingmen whish can do it for them?
    It may sound like going backward from today's trend of having one platform to do all kind of mission, but this could also simplify the conception of both platforms, fighter and drone, if they are design for more specialised mission. for example, the main manned aircraft being use in the role of air interdiction/air interceptor with some AEW networking , while the drones are mainly oriented toward bombing in contested airspace.

    • @lordsqueak
      @lordsqueak 2 роки тому +1

      The manned platform will have to be multi role. But the unmanned drones, could be anything really. It wouldn't make much sense making them multi role, since they are presumably more expendable. And they would be able to optimize for the role, and be better at it. (it could be as simple as just flying low or high, you can optimize for one of them.)
      With a modular enough system, you can just develop new drones to use as time goes on.
      I wonder if in the future, we might just see dedicated drone commander planes, which job is going to be to operate the drones to carry out any jobs. But for now, I think maybe the first step would be a 2 seater, with a drone operator in the back.

    • @PrograError
      @PrograError 2 роки тому

      @@lordsqueak might not be a 2 seater tho, every country is dealing with a falling birthrate. to be more "effective", it's better to use one pilot but computer AI helps to delineate task to RWs / drones with them dealing with the land or air targets while the pilot deal with flying and target confirmation, as well as occasional dogfighting (not that there's gonna be lots of it, but USAF learned it the hard way during vietnam with their trust in the BVR missiles...)

  • @dwightstone7483
    @dwightstone7483 Рік тому +1

    Yes Japan ! 🇯🇵

  • @adisura9904
    @adisura9904 2 роки тому

    Technically India too is in the Race as the AMCA mk2 is reported to have some 6th gen technologies. AMCA is in its CDR phase and is a while away from being prototyped and tested however there are plans to make this 5th gen aircraft a 5.5 or closer to 6th gen in later variants. Just something I thought I'd bring it up. All that said, AMCA is still a while away and also it's not really a dedicated 6th gen design either at least as far as I know.

    • @lagrangewei
      @lagrangewei 2 роки тому

      a 5gen+ is still a 5gen+. 6th gen is about the engine, there is no 6gen engine program for AMCA, and honestly India isn't going to waste money on a medium fighter. a country as big as India will always prioritise heavy fighter.

    • @tirthavb
      @tirthavb 2 роки тому +3

      India is at least 30 yrs behind. I wouldn't take the tall claims of DRDO/HAL very seriously. India can maybe produce a 4.5 gen aircraft in the next 10 years and that's saying a lot

  • @peceed
    @peceed 2 роки тому

    There are 2 shocking things. One is the lack of development missiles with folded wings, having rectangular cross-section. They could pack 8-12 of them with ease instead of 4-6.
    Even more surprising is the lack of conformal weapon bay under belly for long strike missions: weapon bay could be filled with additional fuel tank.
    Ideal 6th generation fighter should have fully exchangeable alternative bottoms.

  • @josiehinton4351
    @josiehinton4351 2 роки тому

    Your comment about "plasma" reminds me of multiple reports that the B2 implements a Bifeld-Brown Effect static field as part of it's radar evasion. This is essentially the "plasma" but it's not real plasma. Videos of the B2 passing through clouds seems to confirm this is in use as the clouds part away before the plane as if a large bubble was surrounding it.
    What I have seen suggests the static charge is produced at the engine exhaust passages. The leading edge of the wings form one electrode while the exhaust gasses are the opposite charge. This then is what forms the ion bubble that effectively disperses radar before it can hit the fuselage. Other factors also suggest this is the case as the B2 is a flying faraday cage and specific requirement were supposed to include a particular type of satellite communication as normal radio appeared to be not possible.
    There have been other studies done on the Bifeld-Brown Effect and several have confirmed it could be used to greatly reduce drag across the wings because it changes the airflow and prevents much of the potential vortecies from forming thereby stopping a major source of drag and increasing fuel efficiency.
    However it's also true that some decade plus ago, an American university published methods to use radar to track even small pockets of ionized gasses in the atmosphere. Their goal was to track radioactive releases by tracking the ionized particles as they traveled. Following this same method a radar system can be made that will track such fields like the Bifeld-Brown Effect produces.

    • @Millennium7HistoryTech
      @Millennium7HistoryTech  2 роки тому

      I am very interested, do you have any sources/references? Feel free to e-mail me in private (the address is in the About tab on the channel page)

    • @josiehinton4351
      @josiehinton4351 2 роки тому

      @@Millennium7HistoryTech I'll have to try to retrace some reading I did a couple of years ago. There were published studies on electro-hydrodynamics and airflow across aircraft wings. Essentially ionic charged flow from the Bifeld-Brown Effect. The problem in researching this field is that so many people want to try to say it's "antigravity". Obviously it's not. It's a well defined high voltage charged flow. What thrust it can produce is actually due to interactions of the charges on existing ions in the air mass. The principle can be seen in school "lifter" projects but the force it creates is nowhere near what would be required for vertical machines. Other applications have been published in scientific white papers.
      I remember as I read on the subject that I found a number of reports that it was used in the B2 design. In a couple of videos of it in flight the bubble effect of the cloud parting seemed unnatural based on any other aircraft.
      I'm not sure if I still have any studies or links saved on my older laptop but I will look.

  • @Cartoonman154
    @Cartoonman154 2 роки тому

    Looks like UK and Japan are working on the engines.

  • @blacquejacqueshellaque6373
    @blacquejacqueshellaque6373 2 роки тому +5

    Excellent info as always. PS. Ceramic is pronounce with a soft C, "Seramic". Yes, English is a stupid language. ;)

    • @minhucovu6321
      @minhucovu6321 2 роки тому

      Not in German, ja ja ja

    • @fredmdbud
      @fredmdbud 2 роки тому +1

      C has different sounds in French, too - civile vs capitaine. And Spanish, even the same word - cacique. And English is so stupid, you needed to learn it to watch his videos and comment. ;)

  • @arx3516
    @arx3516 2 роки тому +2

    Knowing the japanese these jet wil be able to fight in space and transform into a robot.

  • @minhucovu6321
    @minhucovu6321 2 роки тому +28

    Considering Japan's defense needs, having a large combat radius may not be necessary, as long as they can build a lot of planes, and they probably could.

    • @doc7000
      @doc7000 2 роки тому

      At the cost of modern fighter jets I don't know if they can build a lot of planes, though I guess it also comes down to how many planes are you talking.

    • @yapjin8883
      @yapjin8883 2 роки тому +1

      @@doc7000 They probably need some propeller planes to support or take over some operations for their jet fighters. While sitting ducks against jets, having more missiles in the air ready is a much more formidable presence, that and way being way more replaceable.

    • @minhucovu6321
      @minhucovu6321 2 роки тому +3

      @@doc7000 Japan owns a lot of domestic high tech and heavy industries, most of the components could be produced and purchased indigenously.
      Besides, it would be a waste to produce tooling for an entire production line and make so few of them.

    • @randompheidoleminor3011
      @randompheidoleminor3011 2 роки тому +1

      A domestic quantity-over-quantity strategy would be the worst choice Japan could make, as the country is small and situated comfortably inside practically all of China's cruise missile blankets. And even if they were to be able to protect their facilities China's production capacities are objectively superior - literally beating them at their own game.

    • @minhucovu6321
      @minhucovu6321 2 роки тому

      @@randompheidoleminor3011 That is a good point, I would counter with the fact that in a total war scenario Japan has no chance of winning or evading China's offense in the first place, the only way is to make invading/incapacitating Japan so costly that it would be strategically unfavourable to do so.
      An idea is mass production of indigenous high-quality fighter jets in high numbers along with an advanced anti-air network.