The fact that something like this could happen in the upcoming week, I never saw coming. Also, let’s see how the situation develops in Ukraine right now.
@Masked Vigilante So you have no link? Nice story bro! :) I think you should also add some flying unicorns over a rainbow and a few leprechauns to cheer things up a bit :)
What a world it is that this shows up in my recommended tab yet again over 4 years later. And the Russian response to the Javelin; putting Goddamed ridiculous looking sunroofs on their tank turrets...
@@sanyacherep3622 Опыт Украины говорит, что танчики РФ горят как свечки. На них нет активной брони, штор, экипажи бестолковые. Все разворовано главным прапорщиком всея РФ Шойгу.
The Shtora-1 on the T-90AM is a laser warning/countermeasure deployment system (The T-90A has the dazzler but it only works against older missiles), and to everyone that says that the T-90AM has no APS in game, it has a model with the Arena APS which only works against RPG and direct fire ATGM, not top attack missiles On a sidenote, I was surprised at the ERA blocks on the turret roof being able to stop quite a few of the incoming missiles, but that could be due to the missiles hitting the wrong spots. The TOW-2B seems to kill mine in one go every time (Though I heard that the EFP from it doesn't activate ERA)
Even if this was a draw, most of the tanks were destroyed, and that's a very high cost! I think tanks will eventually become obsolete with the advancement of small arms like the Javelin!
People say that since the 60's, fast forward to 2022 and they are still a very prominent machines. Sure there are means to counter but a well protected vehicle with well trined crew can still do a lot of work
And this is setting the battle in an ideal scenario for the tanks, where the Javelin crews are comparatively exposed in a field. Move to an urban area, or a road through a forest, and it would become even more pronounced, missiles coming from spots the tanks can't see.
@@maevethefox5912 ever heard of artillery or infantry....these short range missile systems are in my opinion highly over rated. Nothing has changed in 300yrs....artillery wins battles
Soviet's Tank design has always had a weakness of the autoloaders, one hit from the top means the party is over. 3 crew per and they sit all along the front, easiet toaster oven ever designed.
Javelin very effective on the battlefield against Tanks despite troop lost. But most likely troops would have air support as a backup to help destroy enemy Tanks. 😎😎😎
Apart from infantry and air support, russia has a traditionally very strong and capable artillery. Add russian drones and cruise missiles and very precise, hardened Iskander rockets.,etc. - this gaming BS fits the current soy boy generation. War is neither a sport nor a game, but maimed humans crying for their mommy during the last moments. Stop fighting wars for the warmongering elite, you hopeless sheople.
Tanks without infantry are dead tanks. I would think the T90s would have greater range than javelins and could use anti personnel rounds. The ones that explode over a group of infantry.
True, the Javalins were easy spotting they had sandbags and even then the heat cameras would have spotted them. The us currently has an anti-peronnel tank round but idk if russia has them (I think they do) plus russian tanks usually don't go without infantry, making this a tad-bit unrealistic. The us would have waited for the tanks to get closer to ambush without much chance of enemy retreat. We can all say simulations aren't always going to work the way they are simulated irl
@@larry-333 this is out in the open. If it's in town/cities, tanks are in a disadvantage. I agree, they both need infantry supports. If they mix in drones, then the group that has drones will win.
@@larry-333 I am not a tank expert but one of the jobs of a tank is to get rid of infantry. The machine guns, coaxial and turret are generally for infantry and they need shells against infantry. HEAT rounds are often multipurpose and a lot of anti tank missiles have anti personnel settings. Russian tanks often can fire basically any shell or missile out there. It's quite cool.
@@bunhlsabunbunletssaveanima7953 ikr like javelin has been shot at t-14 so much like man they really did see a lot off combat didn't they? Do u like the new t15321 tank too which is also oneshot for the 500 year old javelin. It's counterpart ifv is an bmp-41 which is also oneshotted by the 500 year old javelin.
@@arkadigitin2937 вообще атака танками без мотопехоты само по себе странно выглядит, я бы на общевойсковой бой усиленной роты в обороне против батальона в наступлении посмотрел.
Usually there's three or so anti tank missiles. You fire a few, then disperse. And you do that over and over again. Standard deployment isn't like this at all. You shoot and leave. Often times two missiles target one tank. But that depends on how they are dispersed. I don't know much about the Jevelin. My crew trained on the Carl Gustav. As well there's disposable anti tank rockets and while these aren't quite up to dealing with T-72/ T-80 or T-90s they will knock out most lighter AFVs.. What the standard doctrine is " fire and forget". You might not knock them all out in one engagement but it will gradually degrade the combat effectiveness of an armoured brigade
And armour isn't thick enough to deal with two or three missiles at once. A team can if well trained get a few shots off before their position is spotted. The attacking forces can rely on each other as well as air support ( to some degree reliant of course on weather conditions). Urban fighting is where tanks have difficulty in.
364/5000 Танки должны были использовать дымовую завесу, чтобы скрыть свое продвижение. Тогда они могли атаковать пушками или пулеметами. Также должна быть минимальная дальность для ракет. Если танк ближе, чем этот диапазон, ракета будет бесполезна. Кроме того, как только все ракеты были использованы, один танк мог уничтожить всех солдат до смерти даже без их оружия.
A T90 cost $4.5 Million usd where as a Javelin cost $175 thousand usd, so just in cost alone that was not a draw. Then there is the fact that removing a formidable weapon like the T90 from the battlefield is also a win.. 3 soldiers man the T90 and a Javelin team is 2.. so there is another win for the Javelin..
@@Hero.Lone-Wolf how did that work out in Syria? The Turks have some of the best drones in the world, yet a bunch of goat farmers desimated the Turks Leopard 2 tanks with ATMGs.. Same in the last Lebanon war with Hez vs Israel..
@@HKTjohnnywalker Turks have crappy drones compared to USA and Russia because Turks don't have any thermal cameras of their own they are sanctioned and it cost them alot to import civilian thermal imagers since they are sanctioned when it comes to military ones. Thermal imagers are single most important thing when it comes to drones since that's how they detect hidden soldiers.
For a very poor battlefield for infantry, sitting out in the open in unfortified positions I'd say that actually went very well. The armored column was reduced to ineffectiveness rather quickly.
No way. The tanks armour would protect the crew , furthermore the T90 is thought to be impenetrable and has 2 seperate compartments, the T-90 had infra red targeting that can pick out human targets from 4 kilometres away, any soldier would be toast long before he ever got in range.
@@samueljesse2179 Wrong. Javelin is a top down attack missile, which means it engages the top of the tank, the top of the turret, the engine decking and so on. The armour in those places is MUCH thinner than the glacis plate and is easily penetrated by a warhead the size of Javelins. Sorry, but the T-90 is not impenetrable, anyone thinking that is a fucking moron. There is no such thing as an impenetrable tank.
I'm sorry to say that, but I am afraid your comment doesn't reflect the reality, as the on-going three day special military operation, started in February, has shown.
Yeah and Some Chucklefuck even managed to kill a T-90M with a Carl Gustav launcher of all damn things... Russian Tanks have now reached Post 1991 Gulf War levels of bad reputation.
scary indeed.but relying on a couple of asymetric infantry attacks wont hold long .probably some gears for the situational awareness equipments and jamming systems can be implemented.
its a game... if in war, Russian tanks would use smoke, and first few tanks would travel zig zag and in cricles to make smoke screens from exhaust , and throwing many smoke charges, while rest of the tanks would come as close as possible to use HE rounds and destroy JAVELIN positions. They are not Soviet army to simply rush.
The efective range of the Javelin is near of 5km and it has autotraking, the smoke is for nothing, autótrack is thermal. You right, that's a game, in real, 10 Javelin or less, kiked all these tanks
@@VITOLLFOTOGRAFIA The real effective range of the FGM-148 Javelin ATGM is 2.5 km, everything else is fantasy, the T-90 is armed with an ATGM with an effective range of 5 km, and a panoramic red-eye sight, this calculation of the Javelins would be instantly detected at the stage of preparation for a strabe and destroyed by one volley. The end of the film!
IRL, russians just hit infantry from the planes or by reactive systems like Tornado. In motion russians tanks has helicopters support else. No one send only tanks versus granade man
Дальность Стрельбы джавелина 3,5 км дальность стрельбы т 90 офс 4 км птур 5 км, как говорится, а зачем подъезжать, если можно поражать цели не входят в ее перекрестье.
Эта ситуация, конечно, нереально. Почему у защитников есть только ПТУР, но нет пулеметов? Но полная лобовая атака может произойти, если командир танка вынужден немедленно захватить эту территорию. Атака ! Атака ! Нет заключенных! Нет заключенных!
How lovely of the infantry to be out in the open, without concealment, without even a proper primary fighting position, nor a secondary position to go to after revealing themselves after firing, to work with. How about 100 mortar teams in the open vs 100 self-propelled artillery?
Imagine if the infantry were actually in reverse slope positions and well fortified, or if they had more missiles per weapon system.....yikes. Go Ukraine!!!!!
@@Alt-vw3uf it’s about weapons systems but you obviously missed that aspect. And speaking of old, did you not see the video of ancient T-72 tanks reinforcing the Russian forces?
@@markc8401 I'm glad now realise that. But it has nothing to do with the stupid thing you said. And re. the Ukraine, the Russians have enormous air and artillery superiority, so the idea of using javelin to stop a massed tank penetration really is ridiculous.
This is the age of technology now meaning a multiple heavy tank can be easily put down by a single portable javelin soldier. It's a scoot and shoot system.
Never had to carry one of the fucking things have you? It is NOT a portable as many like to think. Its fucking HEAVY, so are the missiles, its also fucking bulky.
Херня полная, во первых, на Т-90 стоит активная система ШТОРА, во вторых, Т-90 с расстояния в 6 км может просто расстрелять позиции расчётов с джевелинами, а они только на 2.5 км могут вести огонь, в третьих, повторный пуск из джевелина можно произвести только после 20-30 секунд после первого выстрела /а тут херачат через 5 секунд/, так что, это всё лажа полная, херня, одним словом. Пропагандос.
Tako je BREEEE*GLUPAVI AMERI,cista propaganda*OVO je igra,a rat je je rat*NEsto drugo**pa kako bi oni popili nekoliko OGNJA ILI SMERCA, po neki DRON u RATU*E MOJI GLUPAVI AMERI"ZIVELA RUSIJAAA*
Falso señor mano bajo el T 90 tiene un alcance de 4000 metros y con actualizaciones 5000 m si el haveline solamente tiene 1900 M es imposible que pueda alcanzar aún T 90 los destruye mucho antes de llegar a la mitad del Rango
+Abhinav Nambiar+ Javelin has a direct attack mode that allows it to fly straight at a target inside it's normal minimum range barrier, though whether it's warhead would arm at a range of less than 50m is not clear.
+@@Shrouded_reaper+ the Russians are overreliant to an almost comical degree on ERA bricks even on the front and even to stop APFSDS rounds, which tandem HEAT warheads negate. Passive armor protection on these vehicles is poor in comparison due to an obsession of sub 50 tonne tank designs, though probably not through the turret face. Which was finally broken with the T14 series that is now confirmed to be at minimum 55 tonnes, that one might have beefy enough hull for a Javelin.
Не засоряйте нашим детям мозги своими "симуляторами") Дети играют в компьютерные игры и ничего не знают о настоящих войнах. Не можете победить в реальной войне и побеждаете в выдуманной - это подло)
@@Виталий-и6к2т "Не правильно переварил инфу" Я то все правильно понял, но у вас Тупорылых Соссийцев выключается Синдром Ватоебления и вы все начинаете придумывать отговорки для того чтоб защитить Рассею, и Рассеянцев "великих", Давай Виталичка заходи в гугл и пиши то что я писал ранее.))))))
First, a tank sees much further than a human (or why should a tank carries tons of scopes). Second, a cannon shell travels faster than a Javelin, which means soldiers die earlier.
Actually, no it does not. Even with modern technology one of the major weaknesses of a tank is visibility, especially when the crew is buttoned up. While the main gun optics CAN indeed see infantry 4 km away in some vehicles, that is ONLY the main gun optics, not every crew position HAS those optics available, and the main gun sensor systems are by their very nature narrow field of view. The visibility issue is one of the MAIN reasons tanks are always accompanied by infantry. Even the most modern and technologically advanced tanks do not have perfect 360 degree vision outside, especially when closed up. This is why EVEN TODAY tank commanders prefer to fight their tanks with open hatches so they can maintain vision around the vehicles immediate area. Now I am not one of those idiots who think that tanks are obsolete and the ATGM will always win, but losing sight of a tanks weaknesses is JUST as bad as overhyping ATGM's. Tanks DO have weaknesses, but the point of modern warfare is to combine your various arms in such a way as to maximise their strengths and cover their weaknesses with other assets. That is why it is called COMBINED ARMS..... Tanks do not fight alone, neither do infantry.... People need to remember that.
everyone understands that the javelin has a range of 1 km, and the T-90M tank gun fires at 5 km, in addition, the 125 mm gun is capable of firing high-explosive fragmentation shells. The T-90, even in its early versions, has a shell with a blast in the air. Next, you yourself must understand what will happen to the infantry
😬 in reality who the idiot whom dig those fox holes. You don't need to pop out right. It's Over the top even Kornet don't exposed the team. Anyway MBT is screw by any atgm if properly used. Not in this situation since it's a simulation and simulator have no fear
The tanks should have used a smoke screen to conceal their advance. Then they could attack with cannons or machine guns. Also there must be a minimum range for the missiles. If the tank is closer than that range the missile would be useless. Also once all the missiles have been used a single tank could crush all the soldiers to death even without their weapons.
@@jomuller2212 What are you even saying? Their goal was to successfully invade Chechnya and they had to do it by destroying the thing they were fighting for.
Ребята, вы учитывайте ещё то, что танки пошли без прикрытия авиации и артподготовки для наступления. В городских условиях и РПГ эффективен. Сбоку, сзади . Так что это идеальные условия, представленные в ролике.
La armadura reactiva explosiva no significa que sea invencible, la armadura reactiva es principalmente para ojivas explosivas, pero puede funcionar en cierto grado con municiones perforantes.
El javelin es muy efectivo con carros parados, en movimiento no acierta siempre y además no han puesto las contramedidas de los carros, una filfa de recreación
Storytellers, t90ms will not enter the affected area, its range of fire is higher than that of the Javelins, and no one has canceled its electronic warfare with active protection.
And now it's April 2022 and we can have a better understanding of what the true result would be. Time to update the software. Javelins in Ukraine are scoring hits at the rate of about 90%. Catastrophic result every time. Meanwhile, it turns out that Russian tank crews are not very well trained, not are Russian tanks very well maintained. The true result would be all 50 T-90s wiped out in short order, maybe 5 Javelin soldiers KIA.
@@ВасяПупкин-э7ч3е more like the Russians underestimate their enemy The Moskva sinking was just an icing on the cake. So much for your beloved "Fleet Killer" warship LMFAO!
If you Enjoyed this, please leave a LIKE 👍and make sure to SUBSCRIBE now👇 ► ua-cam.com/users/rakcroybrosgaming More EPIC cinematic Combat Mission simulations 👇 ► ua-cam.com/video/_Q5XAvylZRk/v-deo.html
Then add in the illusive factor, positioning and cover. Tanks are doing what they should, the guys are way too in the open and positions are too close to each other. Real situation the tanks wouldn't be able to bring effective fire onto the targets. Guys would be hidden too well in pre made positions.
The tanks aren’t aware of a threat, until it arrives, There attacking, So will be more vulnerable, recon can only do so much, large troop concentrations Big defensive positions, But that’s not how it will go, they’ll hit and run, the highland way, hide then do it again, probably most of Ukrainian military will bunk to Poland once they’ve ran outa war material, get rearmamed from the EU and back in, only one way this is going, Full scale war, hopefully it’ll be conventional but that’s never gonna happen, na it’s a big firework party we’re gonna have, best of luck to you all.
Totálna hlúposť, Javeliny nedokážu zničiť T-90. Tanky by urcite proti okopom použili aj delo a zlikvidovali by vsetky okopy skôr ako by k ním museli dôjsť.
The reason why it will be very hard to attack Kyiv with Tanks, it will become a guerrilla war and Ukraine have a good stockpile of Javelins, Russia will basically have to flatten the city with air support to remove the threat, which really won't look good from their end.
In real war, not that easy likes this video. Tanks never operate alone. In front of tanks there are target markers, hidden snipers, anti tank operators, electronic warfare operators, land miner experts, radio detectors and missiles guiders. Behind those tanks are rocket lauchers, motars. Without a clear target provided tanks wont move.
T90 is equipped with Active Protection System. The system may fail sometimes to protect the tanks, but wont fail all the time. It is not simulation, but fan orgasm.
This attack against tanks from such trenches is not real! Javelin is not used in this way, Javelin is shot and the soldier is relocated (shoot and forget). Otherwise, the soldier who fired the rocket has little chance of survival. Plus tanks have their own active protection and are not so simple to destroy.
The timing of this video wouldn't be more impeccable considering today's events.
I don't think the missile shooter will attack from the front side. They should attack flank positions with cover on both two sides
300 Ukrainians 0=={+=====>
ua-cam.com/video/kCgzpxtpWvE/v-deo.html
Yup thats why im here
More of the Algorithm playing it's usual games; this video is over 4 years old.
@@cnlbenmc this ones not 300 Ukrainians 0=={+=====>
ua-cam.com/video/kCgzpxtpWvE/v-deo.html
The fact that something like this could happen in the upcoming week, I never saw coming.
Also, let’s see how the situation develops in Ukraine right now.
@Masked VigilanteLink?
@Masked Vigilante So you have no link? Nice story bro! :) I think you should also add some flying unicorns over a rainbow and a few leprechauns to cheer things up a bit :)
The Russian sun visors would change all this. But what would be the best change is Russian leadership.
@Masked Vigilante Many many many videos of Russian armored columns destroyed.
@@catonpillow he's not wrong, there are russian tanks destroyed all over the internet
2:12 Tank drives through a guy preparing a missile, guy continues without flinching. A+ for realism!
That's beyond combat mission
What a world it is that this shows up in my recommended tab yet again over 4 years later. And the Russian response to the Javelin; putting Goddamed ridiculous looking sunroofs on their tank turrets...
Draw? No winner? Each of those tanks had a crew of three! I'd say the Javelin crews won by the body count, and the monetary costs.
Смешно говорить о реальной дальности обнаружения и поражения танков и птрк
💪🏻🇺🇸💪🏻💯💯🇺🇸👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻
@@sanyacherep3622 Опыт Украины говорит, что танчики РФ горят как свечки. На них нет активной брони, штор, экипажи бестолковые. Все разворовано главным прапорщиком всея РФ Шойгу.
L
The Shtora-1 on the T-90AM is a laser warning/countermeasure deployment system (The T-90A has the dazzler but it only works against older missiles), and to everyone that says that the T-90AM has no APS in game, it has a model with the Arena APS which only works against RPG and direct fire ATGM, not top attack missiles
On a sidenote, I was surprised at the ERA blocks on the turret roof being able to stop quite a few of the incoming missiles, but that could be due to the missiles hitting the wrong spots. The TOW-2B seems to kill mine in one go every time (Though I heard that the EFP from it doesn't activate ERA)
Those are modern upgrades try the 1950 version without upgrades , you are f@cked
@@diaphouswilter7364 the t90 was developed in the early 90s. Why would they use 40 years old equipment?
@@lolthistruebias5057 good point , but I hardly study tanks sorry
SF films. Real all Gevelins is dead. Stora 1, Stora2... 1.900m tank not coming, tank gun shut 2-2500m.
American propagand.
@@lolthistruebias5057 like an F22
Even if this was a draw, most of the tanks were destroyed, and that's a very high cost! I think tanks will eventually become obsolete with the advancement of small arms like the Javelin!
People say that since the 60's, fast forward to 2022 and they are still a very prominent machines. Sure there are means to counter but a well protected vehicle with well trined crew can still do a lot of work
And this is setting the battle in an ideal scenario for the tanks, where the Javelin crews are comparatively exposed in a field.
Move to an urban area, or a road through a forest, and it would become even more pronounced, missiles coming from spots the tanks can't see.
@@maevethefox5912 I think a lot of that is happening in the Ukraine.
@@maevethefox5912 ever heard of artillery or infantry....these short range missile systems are in my opinion highly over rated. Nothing has changed in 300yrs....artillery wins battles
@@maevethefox5912 Not at all ideal scenario for tanks is staying well outside javelin range and shelling HE at the infantry formation
Soviet's Tank design has always had a weakness of the autoloaders, one hit from the top means the party is over. 3 crew per and they sit all along the front, easiet toaster oven ever designed.
A T80-BVM got its turret blown off today, presumably by a javelin.
Dpicm from a 155 did wonders during Desert Storm.
@@jaffacalling53 оторвало башню у того кто это придумал.
@@MrNPC Must be sick run away from fkin Talibans. US biggest cowards
Javelin very effective on the battlefield against Tanks despite troop lost. But most likely troops would have air support as a backup to help destroy enemy Tanks. 😎😎😎
Also, soldires usually have high ground or concealed positions like in a destroyed building. Very hard for tanks without IRNV to spot them.
@@bananapineapple6949 T90M has 3.generation thermal cameras.
Точно будет поддержка и с воздуха и артиллерия в том числе ..
And the tank has also air and infantry support to destroy the enemy units.
Apart from infantry and air support, russia has a traditionally very strong and capable artillery. Add russian drones and cruise missiles and very precise, hardened Iskander rockets.,etc. - this gaming BS fits the current soy boy generation. War is neither a sport nor a game, but maimed humans crying for their mommy during the last moments. Stop fighting wars for the warmongering elite, you hopeless sheople.
Realistic sound of Javelin.
Tanks for video.
Haha yeah yeah so funny yeah yeah
Tanks without infantry are dead tanks. I would think the T90s would have greater range than javelins and could use anti personnel rounds. The ones that explode over a group of infantry.
True, the Javalins were easy spotting they had sandbags and even then the heat cameras would have spotted them. The us currently has an anti-peronnel tank round but idk if russia has them (I think they do) plus russian tanks usually don't go without infantry, making this a tad-bit unrealistic. The us would have waited for the tanks to get closer to ambush without much chance of enemy retreat. We can all say simulations aren't always going to work the way they are simulated irl
👍🏻🇺🇸💯💪🏻💯💯🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻
@@larry-333 this is out in the open. If it's in town/cities, tanks are in a disadvantage. I agree, they both need infantry supports. If they mix in drones, then the group that has drones will win.
Tanks goes by the camp w/o rifles…
Ahahaha… fairytale.
@@larry-333 I am not a tank expert but one of the jobs of a tank is to get rid of infantry. The machine guns, coaxial and turret are generally for infantry and they need shells against infantry. HEAT rounds are often multipurpose and a lot of anti tank missiles have anti personnel settings. Russian tanks often can fire basically any shell or missile out there. It's quite cool.
0:14 my class when the teacher is not around
Probably the most relevant simulation on the internet today 🤣
Little did we know how much we needed this
Incoming salt
+anno 2070 fan 22+ Salt for the Salt Throne!
anno 2070 fan 22 i need some trucks
To carry the salt
salt=truth
luka bogdanovic your truth = salt
Well,those ATGMS did their job,alright.
in the game ... this is reality ua-cam.com/video/okTTlqFoaCQ/v-deo.html
Thats tow bruh, this video about javelin
@@charlieharper2529 Bruh It's not javelin that's RPG 29
@@charlieharper2529 Also 1 shot from javelin can destroy T-14 Armata nad T-90
@@bunhlsabunbunletssaveanima7953 ikr like javelin has been shot at t-14 so much like man they really did see a lot off combat didn't they? Do u like the new t15321 tank too which is also oneshot for the 500 year old javelin. It's counterpart ifv is an bmp-41 which is also oneshotted by the 500 year old javelin.
С расстояния 5 км осколочно фугасными. За чистить это поле)
@@arkadigitin2937 вообще атака танками без мотопехоты само по себе странно выглядит, я бы на общевойсковой бой усиленной роты в обороне против батальона в наступлении посмотрел.
@Roman Romanov вообще перед атакой мотопехоты будет арт удар по позициям противника.
ыаы зачиста и 0 дж против 50 т90
Прикольно обставили так что жевелин подбивает т-90 учитывая что жевелин наводится лазером. И у т90 защита штора которая блокирует наводку по танку.
@@Darick2892 какая нахуй штора?
Та что у меня на кухне висит 👌😅😆😂🤣🤣🤣🤣
This is game
In the war,everything is more different
You wasen't oh a Battlefield to critizate it
You wasen't in a Battlefield for you critizate it, Kiddo
Tank really forget HE shell
Yeah no shit Nguyen
@@bolobalaman No shit
0:15 lol there panicking
The range of the javelin is impressive. The t-90 sticks out like a sore thumb. The men were to close together, one airburst and you lose your platoon.
tanks will move in zig zag formation ( hide their numbers) and using smoke flares and have extra armour to take on javelin attack
Is the javelin not heat seeking?
Usually there's three or so anti tank missiles. You fire a few, then disperse. And you do that over and over again. Standard deployment isn't like this at all. You shoot and leave. Often times two missiles target one tank. But that depends on how they are dispersed. I don't know much about the Jevelin. My crew trained on the Carl Gustav. As well there's disposable anti tank rockets and while these aren't quite up to dealing with T-72/ T-80 or T-90s they will knock out most lighter AFVs.. What the standard doctrine is " fire and forget". You might not knock them all out in one engagement but it will gradually degrade the combat effectiveness of an armoured brigade
And armour isn't thick enough to deal with two or three missiles at once. A team can if well trained get a few shots off before their position is spotted. The attacking forces can rely on each other as well as air support ( to some degree reliant of course on weather conditions). Urban fighting is where tanks have difficulty in.
@@burken123 sure its heat seeking, hopefully it can figure out which heat signals to target among the cloud of flares, chaff and smoke lol...
Great timing
This is exactly why it was developed. It is being used against the enemy it was designed to fight. Now we need to send the Operators along with it.
Эту кучу джавелинов , простая "катюша" превратит в кучу фарша.
Line Wolf также как из вагнеровцев сделали фарш?
364/5000
Танки должны были использовать дымовую завесу, чтобы скрыть свое продвижение. Тогда они могли атаковать пушками или пулеметами. Также должна быть минимальная дальность для ракет. Если танк ближе, чем этот диапазон, ракета будет бесполезна. Кроме того, как только все ракеты были использованы, один танк мог уничтожить всех солдат до смерти даже без их оружия.
главное не забыть спеть расцветали яблони и груши....😂
ребятам не мешают даже Коэпы на т-90 мс? ну они же Рембо,что сказать
@@jakedee4117 при дымовой завесе ты смог бы только видеть очко товарища в танке ) говоришь нужна меньшая дистанция ) ну ну ) и пол пути не пройдут
A T90 cost $4.5 Million usd where as a Javelin cost $175 thousand usd, so just in cost alone that was not a draw. Then there is the fact that removing a formidable weapon like the T90 from the battlefield is also a win.. 3 soldiers man the T90 and a Javelin team is 2.. so there is another win for the Javelin..
its cgi show .. not even an online game ...
real life all javelin atgm team will get hunted down by drones .. its the way of the future ...
@@Hero.Lone-Wolf how did that work out in Syria? The Turks have some of the best drones in the world, yet a bunch of goat farmers desimated the Turks Leopard 2 tanks with ATMGs.. Same in the last Lebanon war with Hez vs Israel..
@@HKTjohnnywalker Turks have crappy drones compared to USA and Russia because Turks don't have any thermal cameras of their own they are sanctioned and it cost them alot to import civilian thermal imagers since they are sanctioned when it comes to military ones. Thermal imagers are single most important thing when it comes to drones since that's how they detect hidden soldiers.
@@Slavkovic_Predrag ask the Armenians about that.. Hahaha!
@@Slavkovic_Predrag No thermal camera you say?
ua-cam.com/video/RjjbqwlyRGQ/v-deo.html
I just watched the news about Ukraine and Russia and UA-cam recommended this video to me.
For a very poor battlefield for infantry, sitting out in the open in unfortified positions I'd say that actually went very well. The armored column was reduced to ineffectiveness rather quickly.
No way. The tanks armour would protect the crew , furthermore the T90 is thought to be impenetrable and has 2 seperate compartments, the T-90 had infra red targeting that can pick out human targets from 4 kilometres away, any soldier would be toast long before he ever got in range.
@@samueljesse2179 Wrong. Javelin is a top down attack missile, which means it engages the top of the tank, the top of the turret, the engine decking and so on. The armour in those places is MUCH thinner than the glacis plate and is easily penetrated by a warhead the size of Javelins.
Sorry, but the T-90 is not impenetrable, anyone thinking that is a fucking moron. There is no such thing as an impenetrable tank.
The Russian Tankers would have run away after 25-50% losses and would have probably abandoned all their tanks and ran on foot after 75% destroyed.
I'm sorry to say that, but I am afraid your comment doesn't reflect the reality, as the on-going three day special military operation, started in February, has shown.
@@buak809 who are you saying this to?
Jevelyn's range is very small, up to 1km, and the T-90M with 5km can already work!
Infantry has no chance .
Buen aporte ;-)
Pero y en un entorno de ciudad o urbano?
@@mikelfernandez1980 ese entorno es rural , además tienen sistema para defensa..
First of all, the range of Javelin is 2,5 km. That's first of all. Secondly, the range of 2,5 km is enough to blow up your vaunted T-90.
Then how about TENOHEKA BANZAI !!!
it depends if t90 detects all infantry at that area if not then its useless.
Me: *chill of smooth graphics*
After 4 seconds:* tablet explode *
Провели натурный эксперимент. Джавелин рулит.
This aged well now didn't it
Yeah and Some Chucklefuck even managed to kill a T-90M with a Carl Gustav launcher of all damn things... Russian Tanks have now reached Post 1991 Gulf War levels of bad reputation.
scary indeed.but relying on a couple of asymetric infantry attacks wont hold long .probably some gears for the situational awareness equipments and jamming systems can be implemented.
ু ছে লে
its a game... if in war, Russian tanks would use smoke, and first few tanks would travel zig zag and in cricles to make smoke screens from exhaust , and throwing many smoke charges, while rest of the tanks would come as close as possible to use HE rounds and destroy JAVELIN positions. They are not Soviet army to simply rush.
The efective range of the Javelin is near of 5km and it has autotraking, the smoke is for nothing, autótrack is thermal. You right, that's a game, in real, 10 Javelin or less, kiked all these tanks
@@VITOLLFOTOGRAFIA The real effective range of the FGM-148 Javelin ATGM is 2.5 km, everything else is fantasy, the T-90 is armed with an ATGM with an effective range of 5 km, and a panoramic red-eye sight, this calculation of the Javelins would be instantly detected at the stage of preparation for a strabe and destroyed by one volley. The end of the film!
@@ВацлавЭльстерман jajaja very funny dude, you're great ATGM? really? in wich game?
IRL, russians just hit infantry from the planes or by reactive systems like Tornado. In motion russians tanks has helicopters support else. No one send only tanks versus granade man
@@kskuroku that's true, this is only a game.
Tank t90 can hit from a higher distance than Javeline range.
В битве выигрывает умный генерал
И лучшая стратегия с разведкой
Translate this
@@navyseal1689 just paste it in to google translate
Дальность Стрельбы джавелина 3,5 км дальность стрельбы т 90 офс 4 км птур 5 км, как говорится, а зачем подъезжать, если можно поражать цели не входят в ее перекрестье.
Дак не везде же местность ровная как стол.Точнее,мало где
Эта ситуация, конечно, нереально. Почему у защитников есть только ПТУР, но нет пулеметов?
Но полная лобовая атака может произойти, если командир танка вынужден немедленно захватить эту территорию.
Атака ! Атака ! Нет заключенных! Нет заключенных!
@@jakedee4117 первая фраза нереальна, танки в одиночку со второй мировой войны не ходят. Ну только арабов, они их пускают на растопку повстанцем.
После обработки солнцепёком даже ботинок не останется...
Я танк я хочу всех давить гусеницами!
How lovely of the infantry to be out in the open, without concealment, without even a proper primary fighting position, nor a secondary position to go to after revealing themselves after firing, to work with. How about 100 mortar teams in the open vs 100 self-propelled artillery?
Imagine if the infantry were actually in reverse slope positions and well fortified, or if they had more missiles per weapon system.....yikes. Go Ukraine!!!!!
bro this video is fucking 5 years old man this aint even related to ukraine
@@Alt-vw3uf it’s about weapons systems but you obviously missed that aspect. And speaking of old, did you not see the video of ancient T-72 tanks reinforcing the Russian forces?
In the real world the tanks would have called in artillery or air. This was a classic how not to fight...
@@TheGreatAmphibian that works for both sides you know
@@markc8401 I'm glad now realise that. But it has nothing to do with the stupid thing you said. And re. the Ukraine, the Russians have enormous air and artillery superiority, so the idea of using javelin to stop a massed tank penetration really is ridiculous.
This is the age of technology now meaning a multiple heavy tank can be easily put down by a single portable javelin soldier. It's a scoot and shoot system.
Never had to carry one of the fucking things have you? It is NOT a portable as many like to think. Its fucking HEAVY, so are the missiles, its also fucking bulky.
Well, today we don't need a simulation xD
Tank division knocked out completely, it's good trade of.
Jupp, a infantry company, one single, stopped a tank battalion. It used to be an infantry regiment got beaten by a tank battalion.
Give me 50 well trained Javelin teams vs 50 tanks that have to come right at me any day.
Херня полная, во первых, на Т-90 стоит активная система ШТОРА, во вторых, Т-90 с расстояния в 6 км может просто расстрелять позиции расчётов с джевелинами, а они только на 2.5 км могут вести огонь, в третьих, повторный пуск из джевелина можно произвести только после 20-30 секунд после первого выстрела /а тут херачат через 5 секунд/, так что, это всё лажа полная, херня, одним словом. Пропагандос.
Sem toga tenkovi bi pucali iz topova i sravnili amere. Glupava amerska propaganda. Pozdrav iz Srbije
Tako je BREEEE*GLUPAVI AMERI,cista propaganda*OVO je igra,a rat je je rat*NEsto drugo**pa kako bi oni popili nekoliko OGNJA ILI SMERCA, po neki DRON u RATU*E MOJI GLUPAVI AMERI"ZIVELA RUSIJAAA*
Пропагандон тут только ты
Ракета javellin земля-воздух такая мощная что не один танк не останется целый
Кокой земля -воздух?Олень ты.
This is perfect tank terrain, the t90s wouldn't be as effective in a more hilly terrain
Tanks are meant to deflect fire coming from all sides. In hilly terrain you use helicopters
@@NotShowingOff ok boomer
@@hadinsouli7394 ok dirt dauber.
Behold the might of the FGM-148 Javelin missile! Your Russian bias is denied!
*DENIED*
cnlbenmc i cant believe theres an anti tank launcher that could pen
The t90 shit.
I felt like everyone likes t90 and hates abrams
+Tj Aves+ that's cuz the salty Russian fanboy trolls are everywhere.
"salty Russian fanboy trolls" if you looked at yourself...you would regret. hard.
Silent Ghost96 what about reactive armour? ;>
Falso señor mano bajo el T 90 tiene un alcance de 4000 metros y con actualizaciones 5000 m si el haveline solamente tiene 1900 M es imposible que pueda alcanzar aún T 90 los destruye mucho antes de llegar a la mitad del Rango
Well now we know those t-90s wouldn't last 2 seconds in reality.
Сейчас утюжат нацистов под Мариуполем.
According to the Ukrainian experience of using JAVELIN or NLAW from the Russian tank, no one gets out)))
бумажные победы
@@КонстантинГордецкий пусть побеждают.
Разочарование будет горьким.
T 90 has atgm protection. Also atgm cannot target tanks from like 1 to 10m in distance.
+Abhinav Nambiar+ Javelin has a direct attack mode that allows it to fly straight at a target inside it's normal minimum range barrier, though whether it's warhead would arm at a range of less than 50m is not clear.
The APS the T-90 has isn't effective against top-attack missiles.
@@cnlbenmc It's also going to do absolutely jack shit shooting at front armour designed to stop MBT guns.
+@@Shrouded_reaper+ the Russians are overreliant to an almost comical degree on ERA bricks even on the front and even to stop APFSDS rounds, which tandem HEAT warheads negate. Passive armor protection on these vehicles is poor in comparison due to an obsession of sub 50 tonne tank designs, though probably not through the turret face. Which was finally broken with the T14 series that is now confirmed to be at minimum 55 tonnes, that one might have beefy enough hull for a Javelin.
@Demon A Javelin has more than enough explosives to destroy a T 90 from the top. It doesn't need to penetrate the frontal armor.
Не засоряйте нашим детям мозги своими "симуляторами") Дети играют в компьютерные игры и ничего не знают о настоящих войнах. Не можете победить в реальной войне и побеждаете в выдуманной - это подло)
Даун
@@Виталий-и6к2т "Не правильно переварил инфу" Я то все правильно понял, но у вас Тупорылых Соссийцев выключается Синдром Ватоебления и вы все начинаете придумывать отговорки для того чтоб защитить Рассею, и Рассеянцев "великих", Давай Виталичка заходи в гугл и пиши то что я писал ранее.))))))
First, a tank sees much further than a human (or why should a tank carries tons of scopes). Second, a cannon shell travels faster than a Javelin, which means soldiers die earlier.
@@chiken6559 Maybe a larger atgm the javelin goes to 2500m, likely sensor limited. Tanks used as artillery can open up from 10-15 km away
Actually, no it does not. Even with modern technology one of the major weaknesses of a tank is visibility, especially when the crew is buttoned up. While the main gun optics CAN indeed see infantry 4 km away in some vehicles, that is ONLY the main gun optics, not every crew position HAS those optics available, and the main gun sensor systems are by their very nature narrow field of view.
The visibility issue is one of the MAIN reasons tanks are always accompanied by infantry. Even the most modern and technologically advanced tanks do not have perfect 360 degree vision outside, especially when closed up. This is why EVEN TODAY tank commanders prefer to fight their tanks with open hatches so they can maintain vision around the vehicles immediate area.
Now I am not one of those idiots who think that tanks are obsolete and the ATGM will always win, but losing sight of a tanks weaknesses is JUST as bad as overhyping ATGM's. Tanks DO have weaknesses, but the point of modern warfare is to combine your various arms in such a way as to maximise their strengths and cover their weaknesses with other assets. That is why it is called COMBINED ARMS..... Tanks do not fight alone, neither do infantry.... People need to remember that.
What a strange recommendation in 2022 I wonder why I would be recommended this...
everyone understands that the javelin has a range of 1 km, and the T-90M tank gun fires at 5 km, in addition, the 125 mm gun is capable of firing high-explosive fragmentation shells. The T-90, even in its early versions, has a shell with a blast in the air. Next, you yourself must understand what will happen to the infantry
They will be sprinkled with flowers ,right,lol
Javelin range is 2.5km
😬 in reality who the idiot whom dig those fox holes. You don't need to pop out right. It's Over the top even Kornet don't exposed the team.
Anyway MBT is screw by any atgm if properly used.
Not in this situation since it's a simulation and simulator have no fear
Cope harder with your "T-90M is good" bullcrap
Ah yes, a game can perfectly simulate still classified weapons
The tanks should have used a smoke screen to conceal their advance. Then they could attack with cannons or machine guns. Also there must be a minimum range for the missiles. If the tank is closer than that range the missile would be useless.
Also once all the missiles have been used a single tank could crush all the soldiers to death even without their weapons.
@Altug Omeroglu That's why russian scientists developed Chrysanthema ATM. It's radarguided not laserguided only.
You never send tanks without infantry support. The British learned the hard way with their “all tank battalions” in north africa
Russian Army in 1. Chechen war too.
@@jomuller2212 First Chechen war Russia lost so hard they decided to bomb the whole city they were trying to take.
@@ChongiFishing Sure they bombed. But without infantry and tanks on the ground they wouldn't be able to find their goals. And they found.
@@jomuller2212 What are you even saying? Their goal was to successfully invade Chechnya and they had to do it by destroying the thing they were fighting for.
@@ChongiFishing Chechnya was and is part of Russia. So their was no invasion.
В реальной битве сперва поработали бы грады, а танки и пехота зашли бы только для зачистки
Ребята, вы учитывайте ещё то, что танки пошли без прикрытия авиации и артподготовки для наступления. В городских условиях и РПГ эффективен. Сбоку, сзади . Так что это идеальные условия, представленные в ролике.
Если бы была реализована противоракетная защита то для т90 было все намного лучше.
Dima Ozerov неа принцип джавеліна такий що він б'є строго в башту під кутом 90 градусів так що ніфіга не поможе джавелін реально вундер вафля
I don't speak alien
Michael Hamar, против КАЗ он просто вафля.
@@Sam-tw1zt пруфы для начала...
@@МашаМедведева-з3х че каз твой сделает снаряду, который сверху падает?
I appreciate the Bad Company dialogue
La errores de la simulacion son muchos, el T90 esta equipado con blindaje reactivo y la ametralladora es automática
La armadura reactiva explosiva no significa que sea invencible, la armadura reactiva es principalmente para ojivas explosivas, pero puede funcionar en cierto grado con municiones perforantes.
El javelin es muy efectivo con carros parados, en movimiento no acierta siempre y además no han puesto las contramedidas de los carros, una filfa de recreación
Storytellers, t90ms will not enter the affected area, its range of fire is higher than that of the Javelins, and no one has canceled its electronic warfare with active protection.
А почему не используется дымовые завесы, комплекс штора и тд?
Скажи спасибо что танкисты с пистолетов не стреляют высунувшись с башни
And now it's April 2022 and we can have a better understanding of what the true result would be. Time to update the software. Javelins in Ukraine are scoring hits at the rate of about 90%. Catastrophic result every time. Meanwhile, it turns out that Russian tank crews are not very well trained, not are Russian tanks very well maintained. The true result would be all 50 T-90s wiped out in short order, maybe 5 Javelin soldiers KIA.
これは違う。ジャベリンの圧勝でしょう。だいたいこんな接近戦しません。
This system of troops on top of each other is not used... I was a Paratrooper and we were taught that we should be separate... away from each other...
The tanks would have just opened up well past the range of the ATGMs. What a silly unrealistic scenario.
Недооценка противника вечная проблема американцев.
@@ВасяПупкин-э7ч3е more like the Russians underestimate their enemy
The Moskva sinking was just an icing on the cake. So much for your beloved "Fleet Killer" warship LMFAO!
If you Enjoyed this, please leave a LIKE 👍and make sure to SUBSCRIBE now👇
► ua-cam.com/users/rakcroybrosgaming
More EPIC cinematic Combat Mission simulations 👇
► ua-cam.com/video/_Q5XAvylZRk/v-deo.html
Then add in the illusive factor, positioning and cover.
Tanks are doing what they should, the guys are way too in the open and positions are too close to each other.
Real situation the tanks wouldn't be able to bring effective fire onto the targets.
Guys would be hidden too well in pre made positions.
T90 can shoot from almost 5 km, they wouldn't have to be at 1900 meters, they could destroy them at a distance that javelin cannot reach
But Like in Ukraine they can hide and then when you arrive they shot you
@@galaxymyt4834in Ukraine maybe but the simulation was in an open field
The tanks aren’t aware of a threat, until it arrives,
There attacking,
So will be more vulnerable, recon can only do so much, large troop concentrations
Big defensive positions,
But that’s not how it will go, they’ll hit and run, the highland way, hide then do it again, probably most of Ukrainian military will bunk to Poland once they’ve ran outa war material, get rearmamed from the EU and back in, only one way this is going,
Full scale war, hopefully it’ll be conventional but that’s never gonna happen, na it’s a big firework party we’re gonna have, best of luck to you all.
@@alanwilkin8869 sure but tanks have infrared vision and they can spot you from the heat your body emits ,let alone 50 guys in plane field
This is the new source of Russian PSTD on Ukraine. St.Javelin mother of all top hits.
Now a T-90M was killed by a goddamned Carl Gustav of all things...
OH GOD THE EAR RAPE
В сирии видели джавелин против т90 в реальном бою. Закрыли лавочку.там даже штора не работала, так как был открыт люк .
Please consider re-running the SIM w/4 missiles per infantry soldier.
Russia’s tanks has has range over 5000 m for antitroops fire and 12000 m for smart millse. Do not fotget night vision and hotvision.
haha 4 years later, we get to test it irl
Why risk infantry when you can use drones from safety in a warm and cozy office?
Totálna hlúposť, Javeliny nedokážu zničiť T-90. Tanky by urcite proti okopom použili aj delo a zlikvidovali by vsetky okopy skôr ako by k ním museli dôjsť.
The reason why it will be very hard to attack Kyiv with Tanks, it will become a guerrilla war and Ukraine have a good stockpile of Javelins, Russia will basically have to flatten the city with air support to remove the threat, which really won't look good from their end.
do javelins work in cities?
The Russians will think the sky is falling! And don't forget about the surface to air
rocket crews.
@@V.D.22 Especially good compared to tanks.
Полный бред их с землёй Буратино сравняет, а потом только танки пойдут
Также как и ядерная мина под танком в центре ряда.
In real war, not that easy likes this video. Tanks never operate alone. In front of tanks there are target markers, hidden snipers, anti tank operators, electronic warfare operators, land miner experts, radio detectors and missiles guiders. Behind those tanks are rocket lauchers, motars. Without a clear target provided tanks wont move.
T90 is equipped with Active Protection System. The system may fail sometimes to protect the tanks, but wont fail all the time. It is not simulation, but fan orgasm.
It’s dosent work against top attack Missile
Does the author of the video know what artillery preparation is before attacking enemy positions?)))
2:31 javelin cant be fired at that range....if soldier gets opportunity to fire it it will miss actually it would have 11% chance to hit
Javelin have a direct fire mode as well.
@@littlearvin1641 it's too close in that's range and velocity is unrealistic in this game
Вот так мы сегодня истребляем их Т-90 этими чудесными противотанковыми ракетами
At 2:15 tank rolled over the man and nothing happened. Such a shame on game
Lately that game become reality.
Javelin has fire range up to 4000m, operated by two people... this battle would be total victory for Javelin shooters. Even half of them would win it.
I love it!
Лучше бы на мечах вышли. Дёшево и сердито.
Axaxaxa 😂
А ещё лучше - белый дом на белый дом. Сами затеяли войну сами пусть бьются
На мечах у них вообще без шаснов)
Настоящие боевые действия мало похожи на тир!)В ВОВ панцерфаустников сначала зачищала пехота!
Javelin vs Abrams 50 vs 50
Jav will still fuck the Abrams up there is no know armour on the battle field that can defeat jav
This attack against tanks from such trenches is not real! Javelin is not used in this way, Javelin is shot and the soldier is relocated (shoot and forget). Otherwise, the soldier who fired the rocket has little chance of survival. Plus tanks have their own active protection and are not so simple to destroy.
At what distance does it take the javelin to arm itself once fired? Cheers
Эх ребята , вам только на симуляторах и воевать.
Вы же так всех и побеждаете.
Живете в своих фантазиях.
Молодцы😂
Air burst rounds?
I guess modernized T-90AM got those
It's the aps
Jewelin is just a good trophy as practice has shown
Wouldn't the tanks best bet be to move forward and weave as fast as they could? Seem a bit static to me.
2:31 for this dead tank, the another tank take revenge.