AQA A-Level Chemistry - Amount of Substance Pt. 2 (ideal gas equation)

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 11 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 156

  • @oonihalai4296
    @oonihalai4296 6 років тому +60

    Went to from an E to a B hella quick with these videos.

  • @gamerpenguin6
    @gamerpenguin6 8 років тому +137

    Your videos and a ton more revision in general helped me go from a U to a C so far. Thanks so much for putting these out.

    • @saidoosman4381
      @saidoosman4381 5 років тому +2

      SleepingWithBunnies i have a u now any tips

    • @AK-yc3tv
      @AK-yc3tv 4 роки тому +9

      @@saidoosman4381 This is not what Eliot Rintoul would have wanted

    • @alvardavidsson5933
      @alvardavidsson5933 3 роки тому +34

      @@AK-yc3tv hey man he's trying why else would he be here?

  • @itsgeorgiapaige
    @itsgeorgiapaige 8 років тому +44

    Atom economy//percentage yield??

  • @wizzalien7796
    @wizzalien7796 6 років тому +84

    5:48 holy Jesus that smack of the lips actually near deafened me

  • @user-kp7wg4iu2j
    @user-kp7wg4iu2j 8 років тому +12

    You make me love chemistry again and enjoy doing calculations. Thank You :)

  • @nicolex6780
    @nicolex6780 5 років тому +3

    hi eliot, thank you for everything you do. as you see im an a2 who just learned how to work out moles, a day before my first chemistry exam, youre a real g and way better than my teacher chris

  • @dirtydiana9618
    @dirtydiana9618 10 років тому +82

    I've learnt SO MUCH!! using your videos, and gosh, I don't think I would have survived Chemistry without your videos. I wish you was my teacher. You're such a gifted teacher! :) I wanted to ask, have you covered the empirical and molecular formulae and Percentage yields in Amounts of substance? I have a mock this week and i'm really stuck on it :(

    • @MrERintoul
      @MrERintoul  10 років тому +63

      ***** Hi, Diana. Firstly, thanks for the kind words! Secondly, no I haven't covered those.
      I'll try and go through them properly quick now though...
      Empirical formula is just the simplest ratio of atoms in a compound. E.g. C2H4 is not an empirical formula, but CH2 is. The empirical formula does not have to actually be able to exist!
      In terms of how to calculate it, all you need to do is work out the moles of the elements you are given. You do this by calculating moles as mass / Mr as per usual. Note that you may be given the masses of the elements in the compound, OR you might be given the percentages of each element. Either way, just multiply the mass or % by the Mr and you've got your moles! Then it's a case of finding the simplest ratio. E.g. 3 C to 6 O would be 1 C to 2 O etc.
      % yield is basically just an efficiency calculation. You put the amount you actually got, in g, over the theoretical amount you could get (from a calculation) and multiply by 100! E.g. I got 6g of a substance but I found through calculation that the maximum yield of that substance could have been 10g. My calculation is (6/10) x 100 = 60%.
      That helped at all?!

    • @dirtydiana9618
      @dirtydiana9618 10 років тому +5

      Yes, it's helped me a lot! Thank you very much! Thank you very much for the time you took to reply also. :) I now understand Empirical formula and the rest of it! I had a question earlier. You know how when you calculate the number of moles from the Ideal gas equation and add up the numbers in front of each compound in the products of the reaction and divide by the number (I can't really explain it), is it the same if I was asked to work out, say, the volume? Or is it just for moles? Do I still add up those numbers and divide? Thanks.

    • @henchhitmens
      @henchhitmens 10 років тому +1

      E Rintoul Don't you mean Moles = Mass/Mr

    • @MrERintoul
      @MrERintoul  10 років тому +12

      henchhitmens You are correct! Typos are the bane of my life...

    • @MrERintoul
      @MrERintoul  10 років тому +6

      ***** Hi Diana. Sorry for my late reply, your comment slipped past me!
      I'm struggling to understand which numbers you are referring to... Can you try and be a bit more specific, please?

  • @thedocs95
    @thedocs95 9 років тому +34

    You're an actual legend!!!I missed a bunch of lessons this year, and this is the best make up I could wish for, Thanks.

  • @Rtfsilky
    @Rtfsilky 4 роки тому +31

    bro thanks so much. I already decided that you will have full custody of my first born child, keep it up... or else. xx

    • @el5847
      @el5847 4 місяці тому +2

      remember

    • @Rtfsilky
      @Rtfsilky 4 місяці тому +2

      @@el5847 yeah I do lol

  • @laleenshehzadikhan6594
    @laleenshehzadikhan6594 6 років тому +6

    Omg whenever I watch your videos i actually like chemistry !!!!!!!Im like depending on your videos to pass the exam!!! also can you do a video on the mcq's related to the other gas laws like Boyles law and Charles law because they are very tricky!

  • @coolgayguy
    @coolgayguy 3 роки тому +10

    patiently waiting for the rest of the amount of substance series...

  • @Ariyanali786
    @Ariyanali786 6 років тому +1

    The way you explain the content is fabulous and I hope you realise what you are doing here

  • @Shr3zza
    @Shr3zza 9 років тому +12

    Many Thanks, helped a lot especially as I'm struggling to find revision material due to the new specification!

    • @MrERintoul
      @MrERintoul  9 років тому +4

      +Shreya Gupta Yeah, it's a bit of a pain this whole changing thing. Hopefully these videos will help though and I shall be making more!

  • @ruiscomps1553
    @ruiscomps1553 8 років тому +2

    The work you do is much appreciated. Thank you.

  • @eri4232
    @eri4232 5 років тому

    Thank you so much. Finally someone who explains decently

  • @borojenxx4193
    @borojenxx4193 9 років тому +5

    I've been doing the exam questions on the video before you started to work on them. I got them all right apart from the one at the end. Because I forgot to convert from m^3 to dm^3 🙊. But thanks for pointing out, I will be extra careful if something like this appears in the exam.

    • @MrERintoul
      @MrERintoul  9 років тому +2

      Jen xX It's pretty unlikely that there will be a question where there is a horrible conversion - but it can happen! And well done!

  • @binitaravla1494
    @binitaravla1494 5 років тому +4

    Do you have videos for the full A level couse or for AS only.

  • @skwli
    @skwli 9 років тому +4

    I don't get why you divide by 5 in the boron trichloride question (10:50), I know there are 5 moles on the right, but isn't there 7 moles of stuff on the left? Why do you not divide by 7?
    So, in these type of questions do you only ever look at the moles on the right hand side?

    • @MrERintoul
      @MrERintoul  9 років тому +1

      skwli Using the ideal gas equation, which accounts for all the gases that are produced in this particular question (the question is talking about both), the values for the moles is also taking into account both gases. In total, there are 5 moles of gas.
      Looking at the ratio from the equation, you should be able to see that the ratio of boron oxide to the gases is 1:5. So, to get the moles of boron oxide, we divide by 5!
      Does that make any sense?

    • @skwli
      @skwli 9 років тому +1

      E Rintoul Yes thank you!

  • @mahnoorfatima6118
    @mahnoorfatima6118 8 років тому

    Thank you so much!! The exam questions that you go through are REALLY helpful!

  • @yazanhendi2187
    @yazanhendi2187 10 років тому +3

    aamazzzinnnggggggg!!!!!!!!!!!!11 more please!!

    • @MrERintoul
      @MrERintoul  10 років тому

      Colonel Gains There will be more - watch this space!

  • @cutericepanda
    @cutericepanda 9 років тому +13

    Can you do a video on titrations? Please

    • @MrERintoul
      @MrERintoul  9 років тому +10

      +EXO K&M I certainly can! The concentration stuff is one that is on the list to be done soon! Watch this space...

    • @reezukarmacharyaroll3356
      @reezukarmacharyaroll3356 8 років тому +14

      Still waiting for your titration video! it would be really helpful if you did so :(

    • @Aj-ed7dv
      @Aj-ed7dv 7 років тому

      are you gonna do it

    • @andyc5714
      @andyc5714 7 років тому

      Thanks for all these videos that you have made! It would be awesome if you could also make a titrations video.

  • @ellieowen3667
    @ellieowen3667 10 років тому +6

    Really really helpful! Thanks! :)

  • @sarastyles2634
    @sarastyles2634 Рік тому

    You are a life saver thank you for your videos

  • @livbb505
    @livbb505 8 років тому +2

    Do you have any videos that would help with the EMPA for A2 (titration calcs)?

    • @MrERintoul
      @MrERintoul  8 років тому

      +Olivia Batterbee Not at this point, I'm afraid.

  • @hamzadanial5892
    @hamzadanial5892 6 років тому +1

    8:02
    Well said good sir.
    Well said indeed

  • @jamhead4866
    @jamhead4866 9 років тому +2

    I'm quite confused on one of the questions you did, the second one. PV=nRT aids in discovering the total moles of the gases produced.. And am I right in saying the the total moles of Reactants will equal total moles of Products? You divided it by five because there were five moles on the right and one mole on the left, However I would have divided it by 7, because I would have assumed that the reactant's total moles would have equaled 0.004 ( or whatever the sum came to). And the ratio there is 1:7, I know I'm wrong, I'm just wondering why :)! Thank you!

    • @MrERintoul
      @MrERintoul  9 років тому +2

      Jam Head It helps if you can link to the point in the video!
      No, you're over simplifying things slightly. You may find that the ratio of compounds shows that there are more moles on one side than the other, but it's what each compound contains that makes the difference.
      For example, the reaction of carbon and oxygen, C + O2 --> CO2, shows 2 moles becoming one. However, all of the atoms have remained, they are now just in one compound rather than being separate.
      In the example in the video, it is the products, NOT the reactants that we are looking at - the give-away is when it says that the gases PRODUCED occupy the volume of 5000 cm3 etc.
      However, the fact that both products are gases means that we can't separate the number and work things out for just one. Instead, we work it out for all and then divide (this works because a mole of ANY gas occupies the same volume - given constant temperature and pressure).
      Has that helped at all?

    • @jamhead4866
      @jamhead4866 9 років тому +1

      E Rintoul Right, I think I understand. So because we know the volume of the gases produced, and not the reactants, we divide it by the total moles of the GASES produced. Also, re-watching the video, I've realised that you mentioned that the gases all occupy the same volume - So I should be thinking of the gases as one ( when it comes to doing the ratio). Thank you, that's helped tremendously!

    • @MrERintoul
      @MrERintoul  9 років тому +1

      Jam Head Thinking of the gases as one big cloud of whatever id probably the easiest way to think about it. Then when you've calculated bits, you can divide by the ratios to single out the individuals. That OK?

  • @sea5205
    @sea5205 5 років тому

    I do ocr and honestly your videos are the best

  • @zamiracool
    @zamiracool 8 років тому

    This video was so helpful, appreciate it.

  • @umardawood1659
    @umardawood1659 8 років тому +4

    In the second question y did u do 0.2019/5 and take the value of one mole to the other side when the other side =7 moles and the right side =5 moles. Don't they have to be same?

    • @kingmuizz708
      @kingmuizz708 5 років тому

      Exactly what I'm confused about...

    • @Zen_Zen_Zense
      @Zen_Zen_Zense 4 роки тому

      that's exactly what's confusing me too

    • @DJ-tc6me
      @DJ-tc6me 4 роки тому

      The question asked for the boron oxide specifically so you only relate it to that.

    • @Zen_Zen_Zense
      @Zen_Zen_Zense 4 роки тому

      @@DJ-tc6me ohhh thanx

  • @ChiddyChiddy01
    @ChiddyChiddy01 8 років тому +1

    10cm3 gaseous hydrocarbon reacts completely with 40cm3 oxygen to produce 30cm3 carbon dioxide. How do you find the number of carbon atoms in the formula of the hydrocarbon??

    • @MrERintoul
      @MrERintoul  8 років тому

      +Chiddy01 You need to think about where the carbon dioxide comes from... All carbons in the carbon dioxide come from the initial hydrocarbon. Once you know the moles of the carbon dioxide you can work out the ratio and get the numbers.

  • @zp1312
    @zp1312 9 років тому +3

    LIFE SAVER.

  • @umardawood1659
    @umardawood1659 8 років тому

    Amazing video!!!! How dyu convert from dm3 to m3?

  • @34naveed
    @34naveed 9 років тому +2

    Errmm one question. How would you change the *c ( degrees Celsius) to k

    • @MrERintoul
      @MrERintoul  9 років тому +4

      +naveed ehsan Add 273 e.g. 25 C would be 298 K.

    • @34naveed
      @34naveed 9 років тому +1

      +E Rintoul thnx

  • @getochild13
    @getochild13 9 років тому +5

    how do you know thers 5?

    • @MrERintoul
      @MrERintoul  9 років тому +2

      +ghetto child Errr. Do you want to be a little less vague...? Haha.

  • @prav8141
    @prav8141 7 років тому +3

    Will these videos go in par with the new A-level syllabus?

  • @chrispeleties3200
    @chrispeleties3200 6 років тому

    Will you be adding atom economy/ percentage yield/ titrations and back titrations?

  • @darkmoon3646
    @darkmoon3646 6 років тому

    Exam tomorrow and I legit just found u now

  • @N1RUg4merPr0du10n5
    @N1RUg4merPr0du10n5 8 років тому +2

    For the last question, when you wrote 0.111242 m cubed. How did u get m cubed

    • @bodekaty
      @bodekaty 7 років тому

      V is given as m cubed in the ideal gas equation.

  • @34naveed
    @34naveed 9 років тому +1

    Great video😄😄😄😃😄

    • @MrERintoul
      @MrERintoul  9 років тому

      +naveed ehsan Thanks very much :)

  • @daboomchakalaka7898
    @daboomchakalaka7898 6 років тому

    Hi there, would you be able to make a video covering those really tough titration calculations please : / would be a massive help!

  • @oliverewer4802
    @oliverewer4802 7 років тому

    for the first question , wouldn't you use the NO in reaction three by finding out how much NO2 is made, just wondering

  • @dakotafireshard7367
    @dakotafireshard7367 9 років тому +1

    haven't you missed a large part of the amount of substance section? or do we not need to really know that stuff? (atom economy/ percentage yield etc)

    • @MrERintoul
      @MrERintoul  9 років тому

      Dakota fireshard Yep, I never got round to covering the atom economy and other bits. I felt as though they were easier and so I left them out and did what I thought was some of the harder stuff! I will eventually get it done, though. And you certainly DO need to know it!

    • @dakotafireshard7367
      @dakotafireshard7367 9 років тому +2

      ok thank you very much your videos you have done certainly are amazing :D

  • @aqi4162
    @aqi4162 7 років тому +2

    12:50 I got 2.79 using full values

  • @nody9960
    @nody9960 8 років тому

    awesome video

  • @nimo2714
    @nimo2714 6 років тому

    Thank you, this was very much appreciated :)

  • @rumanaarulezs1575
    @rumanaarulezs1575 10 років тому +1

    Have you done a video on atom economy yet? and percentage yield?

    • @rumanaarulezs1575
      @rumanaarulezs1575 10 років тому +1

      Could you help me how to figure this answer out? 'If the percentage yield of ammonia in the Haber Process is 15% what mass of ammonia is produced from 5 tonnes of hydrogen?'

  • @connorkirk7400
    @connorkirk7400 8 років тому

    Do you have anything on Kc??

  • @meat4359
    @meat4359 2 роки тому

    hello I didn't get how you got the 273 for the temperature bit? would you mind explaining it a bit? Thank you!

  • @aavashism
    @aavashism 8 років тому

    in 6:45 why is it devided by ten ? and if it is bc ( 6+4=10) then why did you multiply 4 again/ :) ?

    • @praptiadhikari9054
      @praptiadhikari9054 8 років тому +2

      because out of the total moles of product only four tenth of it is NO

  • @abrarfaiyaz2661
    @abrarfaiyaz2661 6 років тому

    Please do make a video on Percentage Purity and Yield

  • @rodaynaraydan1076
    @rodaynaraydan1076 4 роки тому

    is there a video on percentage yield ?????????

  • @darthvader-kp2ht
    @darthvader-kp2ht 7 років тому

    hi love ur vids but my as chem exam is in Friday and I was wondering if you could make a video on titration and percentage purity before that if you can please

  • @_-_-__-_-_5428
    @_-_-__-_-_5428 5 років тому +21

    *10:06** where my 2019 gang at* 🤭

  • @kpopff
    @kpopff Рік тому

    Sir can you finish the amount of substance series😭😭

  • @AnimeLifestylee
    @AnimeLifestylee 6 років тому

    where is the part 3 of amount of substance?
    plz make it

  • @nissanmicra9277
    @nissanmicra9277 7 років тому

    Where's the empirical formula video?

  • @founderafrica3844
    @founderafrica3844 7 років тому

    hello, how come the molar mass of bromine you used was 10.8 ,the periodic table says 79.904

    • @Jaydee8652
      @Jaydee8652 Рік тому

      Boron and Bromine aren’t the same thing.

  • @oswin4715
    @oswin4715 7 років тому

    Thanks for the help!

  • @benjibooce7844
    @benjibooce7844 8 років тому

    Can you make a video on the ideal gas chapter in terms of what its about and what's behind it? It would be really helpful if you could :D

  • @Mercy.O.
    @Mercy.O. 8 років тому

    can you do ionic equations please

  • @ghoda-r3854
    @ghoda-r3854 8 років тому

    How do i convert dm3 to m3?

  • @revisionrevision451
    @revisionrevision451 8 років тому

    During the actual exam, can we use highlighters to highlight the important parts of questions, or is that not allowed?

    • @Shazzkid
      @Shazzkid 8 років тому

      Yup u can do that

  • @danfletcher2765
    @danfletcher2765 7 років тому

    where is empirical and molecular formula as part of this topic?

  • @jadebaton2859
    @jadebaton2859 5 років тому

    Avogardo's constant???

  • @sarahhijazi6651
    @sarahhijazi6651 7 років тому

    i am doing AS chemistry unit 1
    is this included in our sylabus ??

  • @Zen_Zen_Zense
    @Zen_Zen_Zense 4 роки тому

    does anyone know how the moles of B2O3 is 0.2019/5? its there 7 moles on the left-hand side, so how does it equate to 5 moles on the other side

    • @farah-vb4ti
      @farah-vb4ti 4 роки тому +1

      The question told you the information to work out 'the two gases produces' which gave you the answer of 0.2019 for the total number of moles on the products side of the equation. And even though the ration of moles of ALL the reactants to all the products is 7:5, the only reactant the question cares about is boron oxide ('calculate the mass of boron oxide produced') which is only 1 mole.
      You worked out that 0.2019=5parts
      So 0.2019/5 will give you one part.
      Make sure to make your final answer into grams (by multiplying by the Mr)

    • @Zen_Zen_Zense
      @Zen_Zen_Zense 4 роки тому

      @@farah-vb4ti thank you🙏 I did kind of figure it out later, just forgot to revome the comment

    • @Zen_Zen_Zense
      @Zen_Zen_Zense 4 роки тому +1

      @@farah-vb4ti lmao im here revisiting this topic and i got stuck on the exact same question again

    • @farah-vb4ti
      @farah-vb4ti 4 роки тому +1

      @@Zen_Zen_Zense lmaooo. U understand it now right.? When r ur exams?

    • @Zen_Zen_Zense
      @Zen_Zen_Zense 4 роки тому

      @@farah-vb4tihey how you been?
      got mocks in November 23 :( if we don't do the actual exams they'll use those results) - ngl i was stuck on it again, same part too 😂. i got stuck with the 1 mole = 0.2019/5

  • @reecedavies6884
    @reecedavies6884 6 років тому

    For the first exam question, don’t you have to worry about the mole ratio on the left hand side, why?

  • @gothamrues7510
    @gothamrues7510 6 років тому

    Thanks

  • @HeemDVD
    @HeemDVD 6 років тому

    273 kelvin

  • @laylaa8759
    @laylaa8759 7 років тому

    For the last question, i got 11.6 dm cubed because the calculation came to 0.011622366 m cubes and then multiplied by 1000 gave 11.622366?

    • @JBry_
      @JBry_ 7 років тому

      Layla A nah I get 11.1 dm^3

    • @JBry_
      @JBry_ 7 років тому

      Layla A yeah you multiplied by 0.42 instead of 0.402

    • @laylaa8759
      @laylaa8759 7 років тому

      Oh I see now thanks for letting me know :)

  • @PabloEscobar-mm2xn
    @PabloEscobar-mm2xn 3 роки тому +3

    I'm love COCAïNE

  • @sahibmalhotra9361
    @sahibmalhotra9361 6 років тому

    U

  • @user-fs5pg6po3h
    @user-fs5pg6po3h 27 днів тому

    I have a crush in you

  • @gamer_ksa9517
    @gamer_ksa9517 2 роки тому

    Iiuu

  • @34naveed
    @34naveed 9 років тому +2

    Great video😄😄😄😃😄

    • @MrERintoul
      @MrERintoul  9 років тому

      +naveed ehsan No problem :)