You won't believe i got a challenge from my teacher to give a presentation on this theory (point is i am a girl and in grade 12) and he just gave me because i asked him a question why protons dont repel each other in nucleus...and he gave me this By the way thanks a lot and today is the day to defeat his chalenge and this helped me a lot thanks
My tutor explained this with Dog's Hypothesis, now you have explained some of the uncleared parts with those boy and girl playing with the ball. Immense explanation! Thank you, Sir💌
The catch catch concept was really outstanding, this example explain the whole theory.❤ After watching this yr ,i will definitely think when I'll see any kids playing catch catch like Ram Sita.😅 Thank you so much for this wonderful video with unforgettable example. #23kg_baby #ram_sita #FTLoP
Beautiful explanation. How many pions are there in case of heavy nuclei such as U-238? Are they not added to the mass of the given nucleus? Have any experiments shown conclusive evidence of pions inside the nucleus?
Conservation of Spatial Curvature (both Matter and Energy described as "Quanta" of Spatial Curvature) Is there an alternative interpretation of "Asymptotic Freedom"? What if Quarks are actually made up of twisted tubes which become physically entangled with two other twisted tubes to produce a proton? Instead of the Strong Force being mediated by the exchange of gluons, it would be mediated by the physical entanglement of these twisted tubes. When only two twisted tubules are entangled, a meson is produced which is unstable and rapidly unwinds (decays) into something else. A proton would be analogous to three twisted rubber bands becoming entangled and the "Quarks" would be the places where the tubes are tangled together. The behavior would be the same as rubber balls (representing the Quarks) connected with twisted rubber bands being separated from each other or placed closer together producing the exact same phenomenon as "Asymptotic Freedom" in protons and neutrons. The force would become greater as the balls are separated, but the force would become less if the balls were placed closer together. ------------------------ String Theory was not a waste of time, because Geometry is the key to Math and Physics. However, can we describe Standard Model interactions using only one extra spatial dimension? What if we describe subatomic particles as spatial curvature, instead of trying to describe General Relativity as being mediated by particles? Quantum Entangled Twisted Tubules: “We are all agreed that your theory is crazy. The question which divides us is whether it is crazy enough to have a chance of being correct.” Neils Bohr (lecture on a theory of elementary particles given by Wolfgang Pauli in New York, c. 1957-8, in Scientific American vol. 199, no. 3, 1958) The following is meant to be a generalized framework for an extension of Kaluza-Klein Theory. Does it agree with the “Twistor Theory” of Roger Penrose? During the early history of mankind, the twisting of fibers was used to produce thread, and this thread was used to produce fabrics. The twist of the thread is locked up within these fabrics. Is matter made up of twisted 3D-4D structures which store spatial curvature that we describe as “particles"? Are the twist cycles the "quanta" of Quantum Mechanics? When we draw a sine wave on a blackboard, we are representing spatial curvature. Does a photon transfer spatial curvature from one location to another? Wrap a piece of wire around a pencil and it can produce a 3D coil of wire, much like a spring. When viewed from the side it can look like a two-dimensional sine wave. You could coil the wire with either a right-hand twist, or with a left-hand twist. Could Planck's Constant be proportional to the twist cycles. A photon with a higher frequency has more energy. ( E=hf, More spatial curvature as the frequency increases = more Energy ). What if gluons are actually made up of these twisted tubes which become entangled with other tubes to produce quarks. (In the same way twisted electrical extension cords can become entangled.) Therefore, the gluons are a part of the quarks. Quarks cannot exist without gluons, and vice-versa. Mesons are made up of two entangled tubes (Quarks/Gluons), while protons and neutrons would be made up of three entangled tubes. (Quarks/Gluons) The "Color Force" would be related to the XYZ coordinates (orientation) of entanglement. "Asymptotic Freedom", and "flux tubes" are logically based on this concept. The Dirac “belt trick” also reveals the concept of twist in the ½ spin of subatomic particles. If each twist cycle is proportional to h, we have identified the source of Quantum Mechanics as a consequence twist cycle geometry. Modern physicists say the Strong Force is mediated by a constant exchange of Mesons. The diagrams produced by some modern physicists actually represent the Strong Force like a spring connecting the two quarks. Asymptotic Freedom acts like real springs. Their drawing is actually more correct than their theory and matches perfectly to what I am saying in this model. You cannot separate the Gluons from the Quarks because they are a part of the same thing. The Quarks are the places where the Gluons are entangled with each other. Neutrinos would be made up of a twisted torus (like a twisted donut) within this model. The twist in the torus can either be Right-Hand or Left-Hand. Some twisted donuts can be larger than others, which can produce three different types of neutrinos. If a twisted tube winds up on one end and unwinds on the other end as it moves through space, this would help explain the “spin” of normal particles, and perhaps also the “Higgs Field”. However, if the end of the twisted tube joins to the other end of the twisted tube forming a twisted torus (neutrino), would this help explain “Parity Symmetry” violation in Beta Decay? Could the conversion of twist cycles to writhe cycles through the process of supercoiling help explain “neutrino oscillations”? Spatial curvature (mass) would be conserved, but the structure could change. Gravity is a result of a very small curvature imbalance within atoms. (This is why the force of gravity is so small.) Instead of attempting to explain matter as "particles", this concept attempts to explain matter more in the manner of our current understanding of the space-time curvature of gravity. If an electron has qualities of both a particle and a wave, it cannot be either one. It must be something else. Therefore, a "particle" is actually a structure which stores spatial curvature. Can an electron-positron pair (which are made up of opposite directions of twist) annihilate each other by unwinding into each other producing Gamma Ray photons? Does an electron travel through space like a threaded nut traveling down a threaded rod, with each twist cycle proportional to Planck’s Constant? Does it wind up on one end, while unwinding on the other end? Is this related to the Higgs field? Does this help explain the strange ½ spin of many subatomic particles? Does the 720 degree rotation of a 1/2 spin particle require at least one extra dimension? Alpha decay occurs when the two protons and two neutrons (which are bound together by entangled tubes), become un-entangled from the rest of the nucleons . Beta decay occurs when the tube of a down quark/gluon in a neutron becomes overtwisted and breaks producing a twisted torus (neutrino) and an up quark, and the ejected electron. The phenomenon of Supercoiling involving twist and writhe cycles may reveal how overtwisted quarks can produce these new particles. The conversion of twists into writhes, and vice-versa, is an interesting process. Gamma photons are produced when a tube unwinds producing electromagnetic waves. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Within this model a black hole could represent a quantum of gravity, because it is one cycle of spatial gravitational curvature. Therefore, instead of a graviton being a subatomic particle it could be considered to be a black hole. The overall gravitational attraction would be caused by a very tiny curvature imbalance within atoms. We know there is an unequal distribution of electrical charge within each atom because the positive charge is concentrated within the nucleus, even though the overall electrical charge of the atom is balanced by equal positive and negative charge. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In this model Alpha equals the compactification ratio within the twistor cone, which is approximately 1/137. 1= Hypertubule diameter at 4D interface 137= Cone’s larger end diameter at 3D interface where the photons are absorbed or emitted. The 4D twisted Hypertubule gets longer or shorter as twisting or untwisting occurs. (720 degrees per twist cycle.) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> How many neutrinos are left over from the Big Bang? They have a small mass, but they could be very large in number. Could this help explain Dark Matter? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Why did Paul Dirac use the twist in a belt to help explain particle spin? Is Dirac’s belt trick related to this model? Is the “Quantum” unit based on twist cycles? ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ I started out imagining a subatomic Einstein-Rosen Bridge whose internal surface is twisted with either a Right-Hand twist, or a Left-Hand twist. The model grew out of that simple idea. I was also trying to imagine a way to stuff the curvature of a 3 D sine wave into subatomic particles. .
if protons and neutrons are just exchanging some kind of particle like catch catch ...then how they be interchanged into one another....sir pls explain.
Hi - I enjoy your videos (and hopefully am not too old to learn). Where does the pi meson fall in the standard model (specifically Gluons)? Is this force that you explained, same (or similar to) the Strong nuclear force? Is this a emergent force, or is it fundamental?
Mesons belong to a class of particles known as hadrons. Hadrons are defined as particles that are made up of quarks. There are two kinds of hardons : Mesons and Baryons. Baryons are made up of 3 quarks (like neutron and proton) while mesons are made up of 2 quarks (like pi mesons etc). It is quarks that are fundamental particles, neither mesons or baryons. The force I talked about is Nuclear force, which is Not the same as (Strong) nuclear force. Essentially, strong nuclear force exists between quarks to create hadrons, but nuclear force exists between collection of quarks like protons and neutrons to create nuclei. So nuclear force is not fundamental, it is a residual effect of strong nuclear force.
I have small confusion, if pions are unstable and decays to other particles very quickly then how the exchange of pions is possible between neutron and proton?
![Alpha, Beta & Gamma Decay [Complete Discussion]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/eUEgpcQHzIA/mqdefault.jpg)
Nature of Nuclear Forces, if you are interested :)
ua-cam.com/video/43AyN24jZw8/v-deo.html
I completed the series on nuclear physics just now.... It was phenomenal, Sir. Please keep making such videos.
I can confirmly say that if I had this man as my college prof I would have excelled in nuclear physics
One of the most brilliant explanation of meson's theory
Thanks sir 😃
You are making this so much fun - as it deserves to be. I love your videos. Thank you heartily!
You won't believe i got a challenge from my teacher to give a presentation on this theory (point is i am a girl and in grade 12) and he just gave me because i asked him a question why protons dont repel each other in nucleus...and he gave me this
By the way thanks a lot and today is the day to defeat his chalenge and this helped me a lot thanks
Thank u sir ji ❤️ Love from Alwar Rajasthan...... मीणा एकता जिंदाबाद
Loved the clarity, articulation, simplicity, analogies dealing at subatomic levels.
My tutor explained this with Dog's Hypothesis, now you have explained some of the uncleared parts with those boy and girl playing with the ball. Immense explanation! Thank you, Sir💌
I have an exam tomorrow of nuclear and subnuclear physics, im gonna use this uncertainty principle when I talk about pions.
Thankyou
Brilliant explanation. Respect from Bangladesh 🇧🇩
i have just finished the nuclear physics series...Excellent, attractive teaching.. Please do more series like this
This dude can teach!
Explained with such an ease...your explanation was amazing🔥🔥🔥🔥
Great Sir! Your videos are very helpful, Sir kindly make some videos on Quantum mechanics.
Respect from Pakistan!
Best physics videos on youtube
I love your deliverance ability of knowledge.Keep it up sir.
And accept love from Pakistan.
Ram Sita playing catch-
catch analogy is very impressive....
Brilliant sir. I watched your complete playlist on nuclear physics all 37 videos and its wonderful
u r fabulous.U have ability to Make any topic easy whether it is GM counter,cyclotron etc.
just keep uploading videos
Your voice is so clear...thank sir...amazing voice...ndm ny explaination 🙏
Sir 🙇🙇 realy you are great teacher
Very helpful. I'm happy that these videos are in English.
your video is very understanding, makes things simple
Ur concepts r so clear... Indebted to u for such a quality stuff....
15:44 . The value of h is 6.6x10^(-34). But we have h cross ie (h/2π) where (h/2π)= 1.054 x 10^(-34). This could change the resultant value!!
Getting something with help of this legend
Sir your explanation is outstanding👍
I love how you call it catch catch.
I dont know why I am here or how but i love it : )
That was a perfect summary of this theory, you helped me alot :) keep up the good work
Very informative! Thanks!
Excellent and very very useful explanation Thanks dear teacher
Excellent work 👍😀
I am chemistry student i was always confuse thats why proton proton not repell and i find this answer here thanks sir alot
Sir ur teaching very effective .....
I liked very much ur presentation sir
Excellent explanation
Amazing lecture sir.... Thankyou
Great analogy and explanation
Sir your videoes are very helpful. And i totaly understood this topic after seen this.
Thank you so much. Very clear and helpful.
Thanks for the video sir. Thanks for clearing the concept😊
1:23 doesn't the equation require r sqaured in the denominator?
Amazing Explanation !
Well done sir...your efforts are great
Simply wao❤️❤️❤️ keep it up.
The lecture was outstanding....but if what the meson theory said is right interpretation of strong force between nucleons then what about the QCD?
Thank you sir....sir plz provide complete notes Meson theory of Nuclear force......
Bahut badhiya
Nice presentation....unique way ..thank you sir ...
Why is the last reaction that is of the neutral pion a valid reaction? It violates conservation of angular momentum right?
That's amazing bro👌
Excellent lecture...sır please make more videos on quantum physics
Your lectures are just amazing... Thank you.
Thankyou very much to you as welll ❤❤❤
Do you have any more lectures in this series? Like on fermi’s golden rule? Scattering and decay probability calculations? Feynman diagrams?
Great class sir
The catch catch concept was really outstanding, this example explain the whole theory.❤
After watching this yr ,i will definitely think when I'll see any kids playing catch catch like Ram Sita.😅
Thank you so much for this wonderful video with unforgettable example.
#23kg_baby
#ram_sita
#FTLoP
Sir,
It was great series ☺️
It's humble request which books u suggest i can read as i completed ur series so i can master myself in nuclear physics
Amazing explanation sir ❤️❤️❤️❤️
Loved it ❤️❤️❤️
Thank you sir❤💙
Sir i like your teaching
Thank you for this video this very useful to me
Nice explanation 👍
Nicely explained
this is so good.. sir...
Awesome 👍
Sir how many meson will exchanged??
Sir how can a pi mesons emit from p or n either they are made up of quarks???
Shandaar
very very very helpful video,thanks sir
Beautiful explanation. How many pions are there in case of heavy nuclei such as U-238? Are they not added to the mass of the given nucleus? Have any experiments shown conclusive evidence of pions inside the nucleus?
Fauacak ayaoauar amaoama experiment 😂😂 ignore😮"' a'"
Comparing the F of a child to the F between 2 protons put this into perspective!
Thank you very much sir..
Actually I hate nuclear phy sir... Bt ur way of explanation just wow sir.....tq for sharing ur knowledge wt us.... One of the best vdo for me sir...
Thanks. Glad to be of help..
Which tool you used to teach ???!!
Sir, would u tell us the properties of nuclear forces and their experimental evidences.... please
I did another video discussing some of it ua-cam.com/video/43AyN24jZw8/v-deo.html
@@FortheLoveofPhysics Thank you sir
Conservation of Spatial Curvature (both Matter and Energy described as "Quanta" of Spatial Curvature)
Is there an alternative interpretation of "Asymptotic Freedom"? What if Quarks are actually made up of twisted tubes which become physically entangled with two other twisted tubes to produce a proton? Instead of the Strong Force being mediated by the exchange of gluons, it would be mediated by the physical entanglement of these twisted tubes. When only two twisted tubules are entangled, a meson is produced which is unstable and rapidly unwinds (decays) into something else. A proton would be analogous to three twisted rubber bands becoming entangled and the "Quarks" would be the places where the tubes are tangled together. The behavior would be the same as rubber balls (representing the Quarks) connected with twisted rubber bands being separated from each other or placed closer together producing the exact same phenomenon as "Asymptotic Freedom" in protons and neutrons. The force would become greater as the balls are separated, but the force would become less if the balls were placed closer together.
------------------------
String Theory was not a waste of time, because Geometry is the key to Math and Physics. However, can we describe Standard Model interactions using only one extra spatial dimension?
What if we describe subatomic particles as spatial curvature, instead of trying to describe General Relativity as being mediated by particles?
Quantum Entangled Twisted Tubules:
“We are all agreed that your theory is crazy. The question which divides us is whether it is crazy enough to have a chance of being correct.” Neils Bohr
(lecture on a theory of elementary particles given by Wolfgang Pauli in New York, c. 1957-8, in Scientific American vol. 199, no. 3, 1958)
The following is meant to be a generalized framework for an extension of Kaluza-Klein Theory. Does it agree with the “Twistor Theory” of Roger Penrose? During the early history of mankind, the twisting of fibers was used to produce thread, and this thread was used to produce fabrics. The twist of the thread is locked up within these fabrics. Is matter made up of twisted 3D-4D structures which store spatial curvature that we describe as “particles"? Are the twist cycles the "quanta" of Quantum Mechanics?
When we draw a sine wave on a blackboard, we are representing spatial curvature. Does a photon transfer spatial curvature from one location to another? Wrap a piece of wire around a pencil and it can produce a 3D coil of wire, much like a spring. When viewed from the side it can look like a two-dimensional sine wave. You could coil the wire with either a right-hand twist, or with a left-hand twist. Could Planck's Constant be proportional to the twist cycles. A photon with a higher frequency has more energy. ( E=hf, More spatial curvature as the frequency increases = more Energy ). What if gluons are actually made up of these twisted tubes which become entangled with other tubes to produce quarks. (In the same way twisted electrical extension cords can become entangled.) Therefore, the gluons are a part of the quarks. Quarks cannot exist without gluons, and vice-versa. Mesons are made up of two entangled tubes (Quarks/Gluons), while protons and neutrons would be made up of three entangled tubes. (Quarks/Gluons) The "Color Force" would be related to the XYZ coordinates (orientation) of entanglement. "Asymptotic Freedom", and "flux tubes" are logically based on this concept. The Dirac “belt trick” also reveals the concept of twist in the ½ spin of subatomic particles. If each twist cycle is proportional to h, we have identified the source of Quantum Mechanics as a consequence twist cycle geometry.
Modern physicists say the Strong Force is mediated by a constant exchange of Mesons. The diagrams produced by some modern physicists actually represent the Strong Force like a spring connecting the two quarks. Asymptotic Freedom acts like real springs. Their drawing is actually more correct than their theory and matches perfectly to what I am saying in this model. You cannot separate the Gluons from the Quarks because they are a part of the same thing. The Quarks are the places where the Gluons are entangled with each other.
Neutrinos would be made up of a twisted torus (like a twisted donut) within this model. The twist in the torus can either be Right-Hand or Left-Hand. Some twisted donuts can be larger than others, which can produce three different types of neutrinos. If a twisted tube winds up on one end and unwinds on the other end as it moves through space, this would help explain the “spin” of normal particles, and perhaps also the “Higgs Field”. However, if the end of the twisted tube joins to the other end of the twisted tube forming a twisted torus (neutrino), would this help explain “Parity Symmetry” violation in Beta Decay? Could the conversion of twist cycles to writhe cycles through the process of supercoiling help explain “neutrino oscillations”? Spatial curvature (mass) would be conserved, but the structure could change.
Gravity is a result of a very small curvature imbalance within atoms. (This is why the force of gravity is so small.) Instead of attempting to explain matter as "particles", this concept attempts to explain matter more in the manner of our current understanding of the space-time curvature of gravity. If an electron has qualities of both a particle and a wave, it cannot be either one. It must be something else. Therefore, a "particle" is actually a structure which stores spatial curvature. Can an electron-positron pair (which are made up of opposite directions of twist) annihilate each other by unwinding into each other producing Gamma Ray photons?
Does an electron travel through space like a threaded nut traveling down a threaded rod, with each twist cycle proportional to Planck’s Constant? Does it wind up on one end, while unwinding on the other end? Is this related to the Higgs field? Does this help explain the strange ½ spin of many subatomic particles? Does the 720 degree rotation of a 1/2 spin particle require at least one extra dimension?
Alpha decay occurs when the two protons and two neutrons (which are bound together by entangled tubes), become un-entangled from the rest of the nucleons
. Beta decay occurs when the tube of a down quark/gluon in a neutron becomes overtwisted and breaks producing a twisted torus (neutrino) and an up quark, and the ejected electron. The phenomenon of Supercoiling involving twist and writhe cycles may reveal how overtwisted quarks can produce these new particles. The conversion of twists into writhes, and vice-versa, is an interesting process.
Gamma photons are produced when a tube unwinds producing electromagnetic waves.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Within this model a black hole could represent a quantum of gravity, because it is one cycle of spatial gravitational curvature. Therefore, instead of a graviton being a subatomic particle it could be considered to be a black hole. The overall gravitational attraction would be caused by a very tiny curvature imbalance within atoms. We know there is an unequal distribution of electrical charge within each atom because the positive charge is concentrated within the nucleus, even though the overall electrical charge of the atom is balanced by equal positive and negative charge.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
In this model Alpha equals the compactification ratio within the twistor cone, which is approximately 1/137.
1= Hypertubule diameter at 4D interface
137= Cone’s larger end diameter at 3D interface where the photons are absorbed or emitted.
The 4D twisted Hypertubule gets longer or shorter as twisting or untwisting occurs. (720 degrees per twist cycle.)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
How many neutrinos are left over from the Big Bang? They have a small mass, but they could be very large in number. Could this help explain Dark Matter?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Why did Paul Dirac use the twist in a belt to help explain particle spin? Is Dirac’s belt trick related to this model? Is the “Quantum” unit based on twist cycles?
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
I started out imagining a subatomic Einstein-Rosen Bridge whose internal surface is twisted with either a Right-Hand twist, or a Left-Hand twist. The model grew out of that simple idea.
I was also trying to imagine a way to stuff the curvature of a 3 D sine wave into subatomic particles.
.
Wonderful .
if protons and neutrons are just exchanging some kind of particle like catch catch ...then how they be interchanged into one another....sir pls explain.
Because the particle (pi meson) results because of the rearrangement of quarks in the nucleon
Instead of Planck constant
h/2π only give the value of 2×10^-28kg
Sir your videos are awesome ....plz make video on Nuclear Activation analysis
What is the basis for repulsion between 2 nucleon according to meson theory? Please explain it.
can i get lecture on breit weigner one level formula😣
which software you use for writing?
Is there any relationship between "Binding energy of nucleus" and this "Meason exchange theory"?
Thanks sir
I loved it 🤩
Thanks a lot
Thankyou sir please upload more videos
Hi - I enjoy your videos (and hopefully am not too old to learn). Where does the pi meson fall in the standard model (specifically Gluons)? Is this force that you explained, same (or similar to) the Strong nuclear force? Is this a emergent force, or is it fundamental?
Mesons belong to a class of particles known as hadrons. Hadrons are defined as particles that are made up of quarks. There are two kinds of hardons : Mesons and Baryons. Baryons are made up of 3 quarks (like neutron and proton) while mesons are made up of 2 quarks (like pi mesons etc). It is quarks that are fundamental particles, neither mesons or baryons.
The force I talked about is Nuclear force, which is Not the same as (Strong) nuclear force. Essentially, strong nuclear force exists between quarks to create hadrons, but nuclear force exists between collection of quarks like protons and neutrons to create nuclei. So nuclear force is not fundamental, it is a residual effect of strong nuclear force.
Thank you sir.
Sir,plz suggest a book on nuclear physics covering both bsc and msc..syallbi
1) Modern physics by Arthur beiser
2) concepts of physics by halliday and resnick
Books by halliday and resnick are a sort of handbook for physics includes every topics of physics
U r excillent ,Boss
Also provide yr contact no. Too plz
*ur
Thankyou sir
I have small confusion, if pions are unstable and decays to other particles very quickly then how the exchange of pions is possible between neutron and proton?
Plz give books list for np
Sir but i had learned in my previous classes that neutron has more mass than proton
You said it'll be repulsive at lesser than 0.8 fm but the repulsion due to strong force or electrical force