Sorry it took so long. This is probably one of my longest arrangement I did so I almost got burnt out in the process. I want to take a break in arranging... and start writing more short original pieces lol. Thanks for listening as always :)
It's beautiful, to me the most charming piano arrangement of the piece I've found Thank you, I think I'm going to eventually learn this even though I've already bought the sheet for another one
I'm not afraid of this phrase - you are a modern genius of arrangement. Not only do you transfer the music so accurately to the sheet of music, you also add something beautiful from yourself on top of it. I am delighted that I live at the same time with you.
I love that lick in the beginning straight from en avril a paris. I can tell you took inspiration from it. Such an amazing combination of pieces, it works so well
This was absolutely mesmorising. The arrangement is so beautiful and every idea was incorporated with purpose. Not only that, your performance was breathtaking and I’d sigh in some of the great tension and release moments. I’m so jealous, I wish I had arranging and piano performing skills like you fam!
Creativity, depth of musical knowledge, boldness, stellar musical "taste" (in reference to the next note and what sounds good), the fact that you can make even those long-cliched octave runs fit so naturally like tea leaves in boiled water, the fact that you have perfect structural rhythm - you know when to switch up, how to switch up, when to escalate, when to escalate FURTHER; you have it all, all the foundations of a generational talent that is *worth* something. Keep writing!
It's been quite some time since a Howl's Moving Castle arrangement caught my attention. Bravo. Also excellent playing/sequencing. Whichever it is, it sounds great.
This is absolutely phenomenal - not only the arrangement, but the incredible performance.Genuinely sounds like one of the great concert pianists playing a great Romantic piece. Even more impressive given your Oscar Peterson solo analysis; you clearly have an exceptional and broad musical mind :)
Your playing is always so incredible, this channel is so underrated and I always enjoy listening to your arrangements and playing, even if I am unfamiliar with the source material. Wonderful job as always!
Wow. I could hear inspiration from La Campanella in there and definitely Hungarian Rhapsodies. It's incredible how well you play this piece. I also love how you fooled me into thinking "great, another easy arrangement!" when I first started listening. Well done indeed!
The way you introduce complexity but still keep it sounding beautiful is amazing. I've seen many that add a lot of complex parts to their own arrangement of a piece but it's only there to show off. With yours it adds another layer and thoroughly brings out the ideas in the original.
Just arranged Merry-Go-Round for my wind band, it's great to see it for different instrumental combinations. Very versatile piece. Also 3:36 is so Danse Macabre
Wow this arrangement is by far my favorite rendition of this piece. So many different styles and I love your use of transitioning. Excited for what’s to come from a brilliant mind.
Dear lord, what an insanely intricate arrangement and performance. Just can't get enough of it. Thanks for all your hard work and for sharing this with us, it's just stunning!!
Out of the many arrangements of this piece this one really stands out. Gave me chills, I can tell you put a lot of time and passion into it. Really incredible!
I just randomly stumbled upon this channel, what a hidden gem! These arrangements are made so well, they are complex but not in an exaggerated way, and they are also all performed amazingly. Incredible job!
Congrats on 3K!!! I agree completely with PitTan, you're amazing, i really liked all the inspirations you used for this arrangement, let's hope for a 2022 full of hesangasong :)
Loved the reinterpretation! Some reharms, like that on measure 84 were delightful. Also, holy shit, you make the second half sound easy, kudos for managing to play that!
I LOVE this song! I just recently found you (which is a shame, that I didn't earlier) and your arrangements are phenomenal! I will definitely recommend you to anyone I know that loves jazz. Trully a masterpiece and a virtuoso playing it.
A wonderful reimagining of one of Hisaishi's best works, with a nice balance of faithfulness (in spirit to the original piece) and originality. Will you post a video of you playing this? Would be very cool to see your fingers in action.
I want to give you an idea. Make *Fukashigi No Carte **_(From "Seishun Buta Yarou Wa Bunny Girl Senpai No Yume Wo Minai")_* in the style of Nikolai Kapustin or in the genre of jazz. In general, everything is as you like)
This reminds me to "piano fantasia" an album for piano solo from the anime saint seiya, here an example: ua-cam.com/video/lDKd8r1nkLE/v-deo.html The original song is the opening from saint seiya, pegasus fantasy, it would be nice if you make arrangements like this of movie songs
Hey bro, I don't want to shit unnecessarily on this because it's great, and your music is generally great, but listening to it, I can't help but feel like it's all variation on the theme, with the theme never actually being introduced. I'm not sure, if I didn't already know this song's source material, I would really "get" all of your rhythmic inflections. Surely at least the first time the theme appears it shouldn't be so heavily rubato-feeling like it is here. I don't know your creative process, but I know I've made (what I consider to be) similar mistakes when I have introduced so much variation into a piece I'm writing, I realise that the variation is not for my first-time listeners, but for me, who knows the piece very well, and thus enjoys creative variations upon its themes. The listeners aren't familiar with these themes, so the resulting interpretation/variation can just sound like musical weirdness and awkward tempo changes, because they don't have the grounding of having just heard the unaltered (or barely-altered) theme. It feels to me like you're doing this too, but maybe I'm wrong in that assumption. If you happen to know someone who has never heard the original you could even test this theory! My point is, the bulk of this is musically great, but at least from where I'm standing, it's hard not to hear this phenomenon, and it does overshadow the great work you've done somewhat. I don't mean to criticise your piece in its entirety. Its not bad at all, and you have a lot of other good music out there, but I hope that you'll be able to get what I mean by all this and hear what I'm noticing. I'd be interested to know if you are able to see what I mean! P.S. This isn't meant to be rude or pressurising or hateful. You're literally the only channel on youtube I have alerts turned on for. Compose however you want! Ignore this if you want! I'm just here to listen to cool music every 3-6 months. :) (to clarify, this is not hate
Hey Hipsnowsis, huge thanks for your insights :) You are 100% correct in saying that many of my arrangements sound like a variation of a theme with itself never being introduced, because that is intentional; it is just my style of arranging. From my experience, there are couple philosophies when it comes to arranging piano music. One of them is to arrange a theme/melody with minimal change to keep it as close to the original and be familiar, and then insert artists’ own twists and flairs which define the arranger/channel style. This is normally how it’s done by the majority of UA-cam channels. The other philosophy is to take an idea and completely transforming it to something new, often still quite familiar, but also sometimes almost unrecognizable to a degree. I prefer to arrange this way. My idea of a “good” arrangement is one that does not sound like an arrangement, but rather like an original piece. It should stand on its own, without needing to rely on the original source. I personally think arrangers should strive to make an arrangement truly personal, and the ‘popular method’ of arranging simply isn’t quite enough for me to be satisfied with the end result. I think the more thought and development you give to an arrangement, the more reason it gives purpose to its existence. There may be thousands of similar arrangements in the theme of Howl’s moving castle, but i can point to my arrangement and confidently say, that is my version. But I understand why people don’t like to do this method (transforming an arrangement to something brand new). Many listeners would be alienated by your arrangement, and hence not popular, and therefore you get the idea that the arrangement is bad/a mistake. But I just don’t think that is true. When you said “I have introduced so much variations into a piece I’m writing”, I do not necessarily consider that a mistake. Whether it’s good depends on how you develop that variation, and if it changed so much into something unrecognizable, so be it! As long as it sounds good to you. When you said “I realise the variation is not for my first-time listeners but for me”, that is good! My motto is to never try to appease your listeners. What’s more important is a to accurately portray your personal artistic expression. I think as long as you think it’s good, it’s good. Write for yourself, not for the listener. Because there will ALWAYS be fans out there who will like for your creative decisions. In the end, there never is a correct answer to how to “arrange” for piano music, and the popular method of arranging is not by any means ‘wrong’ or that mine is right. This is simply my personal thought on what I think an arrangement should be like, and I still stand by it. I do not agree with your sentiment and critique, but that may be because my philosophy of arranging is different from yours. I hope you understand! PS there is nothing rude about your comments. I really do appreciate your thoughts. Thank you :) PPS goddamit I really need to start arranging some music. Sorry, it will come soon.
@@hesangasong This all makes sense! I think we may be taking a slightly different approach in defining what the ideal arrangement is - my instinct is to make any arrangements I make sound like pieces I would have been happy to release as standalone compositions (obviously copyright but like, my point is I don't want enjoyment of my arrangement to rely on prior knowledge of the source material) - if someone could listen to it having never heard the original and still be able to appreciate everything just as much as someone who had. IMO it feels more like your arrangements are designed as (for lack of a more appropriate term) 'accessories' to their originals - they are designed to effect the listener with the benefit of the context of the original, almost as if they're some sort of sequel to the original. I'm not saying that's what you intentionally do, but that at least is perhaps what might lead me away from this technique, while leading you towards it. It's certainly not a bad thing - it's a lot easier to understand the choices you've made with the context of this message.
@@hipsnowsis7374 hmm, I think there is some confusion here, because my aim IS to make arrangements standalone. And certainly make it stand on its own and not rely on the original source, which I think i clearly mentioned? I definitely do not want my arrangement to sound subservient - it should sound like an original piece. I think I may have misunderstood your first comment. Your second paragraph implied that arranging that is too “out there” is a mistake, so I thought you preferred to arrange in a style that is familiar and close to the original source, hence not as standalone. So in fact, we do have the same goal in mind and I completely stand by your side. Regardless, if there is any point in my arrangement that does sound like ‘just an arrangement’, musical weirdness, or subservient etc, then you would be correct in saying it is lackluster. I guess I only disagree with you when you said you didn’t agree with the first theme introduction having a heavily rubato-feeling section. Imo it acts as a prelude and a preparation to the ‘real’ theme that comes later. I think it’s fine as it is, which is of course my subjective opinion. So yeah.. I think i may have misunderstood your initial comment, sorry for the confusion.
항상 너무 멋진 편곡 감사드립니다 ㅠㅠ
마침 연주회가 있어서 급하게 연습해서 연주해봤어요!
ua-cam.com/video/PpONNLmJfwc/v-deo.html
Sorry it took so long. This is probably one of my longest arrangement I did so I almost got burnt out in the process.
I want to take a break in arranging... and start writing more short original pieces lol.
Thanks for listening as always :)
The wait was worth it!! And I'm so excited to hear some original pieces from you! 😄
how many hour does it take to finish this
It's beautiful, to me the most charming piano arrangement of the piece I've found
Thank you, I think I'm going to eventually learn this even though I've already bought the sheet for another one
Oh my god, it took me waaaay too long to realize that “Hesangasong” wasn’t some random Korean last name
Samee lol.
I'm not afraid of this phrase - you are a modern genius of arrangement. Not only do you transfer the music so accurately to the sheet of music, you also add something beautiful from yourself on top of it. I am delighted that I live at the same time with you.
"Magical" tempo marking. Very fitting.
I love that lick in the beginning straight from en avril a paris. I can tell you took inspiration from it. Such an amazing combination of pieces, it works so well
Now we finally know what it would be like if Liszt was an anime fan!
All jokes aside, great arrangement and performance, as always
The Merry-Go-Round of Liszt.
This was absolutely mesmorising. The arrangement is so beautiful and every idea was incorporated with purpose. Not only that, your performance was breathtaking and I’d sigh in some of the great tension and release moments. I’m so jealous, I wish I had arranging and piano performing skills like you fam!
Aw thank you so much!!
I can hear sparks of Liszt in the arrangement. Phenomenal.
Creativity, depth of musical knowledge, boldness, stellar musical "taste" (in reference to the next note and what sounds good), the fact that you can make even those long-cliched octave runs fit so naturally like tea leaves in boiled water, the fact that you have perfect structural rhythm - you know when to switch up, how to switch up, when to escalate, when to escalate FURTHER; you have it all, all the foundations of a generational talent that is *worth* something. Keep writing!
196小節目でぽつんと小さくなってしまったハウルの城が目に浮かびました…こんなに素敵な演奏が聞けて最高です。ありがとうございます！
It's been quite some time since a Howl's Moving Castle arrangement caught my attention. Bravo. Also excellent playing/sequencing. Whichever it is, it sounds great.
00:48 Rachmaninoff
04:03 Liszt
05:34 Ravel
this. this is the ultimate arrangement for this song
This is absolutely phenomenal - not only the arrangement, but the incredible performance.Genuinely sounds like one of the great concert pianists playing a great Romantic piece. Even more impressive given your Oscar Peterson solo analysis; you clearly have an exceptional and broad musical mind :)
Yes the performance is fantastic.
Your playing is always so incredible, this channel is so underrated and I always enjoy listening to your arrangements and playing, even if I am unfamiliar with the source material. Wonderful job as always!
Wow. I could hear inspiration from La Campanella in there and definitely Hungarian Rhapsodies. It's incredible how well you play this piece. I also love how you fooled me into thinking "great, another easy arrangement!" when I first started listening. Well done indeed!
The way you introduce complexity but still keep it sounding beautiful is amazing. I've seen many that add a lot of complex parts to their own arrangement of a piece but it's only there to show off. With yours it adds another layer and thoroughly brings out the ideas in the original.
so beautiful 🥺🤍
the greatest arrangement of my fav anime movie
Just arranged Merry-Go-Round for my wind band, it's great to see it for different instrumental combinations. Very versatile piece. Also 3:36 is so Danse Macabre
Really really well done!!!! Love it!!!!
Ayo long time no see... I see you brought us a classic 👀
Sorry it took so long!! :(
1:49
My first night of encountering this guy. This is phenomenal. Definitely concert worthy. And such playing! 👏🏻👏🏻
This is disgustingly good. What the fuck
Genius paraphrase!
shes proud of u man
Absolutely genius!
Brilliant playing! This was a very refreshing take on this song, it kind of reminded me of the Hamelin Cadenza halfway through :D
헉 이곡을 이렇게 편곡하다니 천재적이시네요... 워낙 편곡이 많이된곡이라 원곡의 틀에 갇히기 쉬운데 그것을 가볍게 벗어나주셨네요
Good job as always! Reminded me of Rachmaninoff's arrangement of Kreisler's Liebesleid.
Or Ivanovich's "waves of the danube"
Wow this arrangement is by far my favorite rendition of this piece. So many different styles and I love your use of transitioning. Excited for what’s to come from a brilliant mind.
I have tickets to go see Joe Hisaishi, so I am very excited to see you take on this one! Your arrangements are always stellar! Cheers.
Damn son, that was nice - also ty for the free sheets... not that I'll be capable of playing it for another decade.
Great stuff!
nothing better than this, It IS the best arrangement for this piece.
Dear lord, what an insanely intricate arrangement and performance. Just can't get enough of it. Thanks for all your hard work and for sharing this with us, it's just stunning!!
This is just way too good, I hope Mr. Hisaishi can listen to it some day! Bravo!
En avril a paris가 곳곳에서 들리는군요ㅎㅎ
It’s giving Rachmaninov remix and I’m here for it. Excellent arranging!
Out of the many arrangements of this piece this one really stands out. Gave me chills, I can tell you put a lot of time and passion into it. Really incredible!
one of my favorite songs from one of my favorite arrangers!!
what is there not to love :)
thank you!
This is an incredible arrangement with an even more incredible performance. Made my eyes watery, too...
Merry-go-round in Paris! Great job
I just randomly stumbled upon this channel, what a hidden gem! These arrangements are made so well, they are complex but not in an exaggerated way, and they are also all performed amazingly. Incredible job!
This is insane you are truly skilled
Wow now this is an arrangement I was excited to see in my subscription feed!
What a stupendous arrangement!
whoaaaaaaaa this is soooo incredible i love this so much
Brilliant! Great job
3K! 축하해요✨🥳 Beautiful piece as always 🤍
감사합니다!!
Congrats on 3K!!! I agree completely with PitTan, you're amazing, i really liked all the inspirations you used for this arrangement, let's hope for a 2022 full of hesangasong :)
Still gorgeous any time I listen to this. Marvelous!
How are you so good at arrangements dude, this is spectacular!!!
Loved the reinterpretation! Some reharms, like that on measure 84 were delightful. Also, holy shit, you make the second half sound easy, kudos for managing to play that!
Wow!
Verry good arrangement. Original, nice colors
omg long time no see!
@@hesangasong defenitely ! Haha . How have you been ?
Doing good :) I guess I’m still making music to this day lol. Wonderful to hear from you back, I remember your old comments quite fondly.
This is absolutely THE arrangement! 💯
Unbelievable
dude. so good. great work!
You deserve AT LEAST 1000X more subscriber
Thank you, I was in tear while listening, thank you.
3:36 ❤
LET GOOOO such a Beautiful arrangement its really cool but a bit above my skill level but will practice till I get there >:)
I LOVE this song! I just recently found you (which is a shame, that I didn't earlier) and your arrangements are phenomenal!
I will definitely recommend you to anyone I know that loves jazz. Trully a masterpiece and a virtuoso playing it.
Absolutely phenomenal arrangement! I think the best one I've ever heard, you really went all out! And thank you so much for sharing the sheet music!
Thank you very much!!
I love it!
What keyboard do you use? The tone is gorgeous!
Super cool
You are so amazing.
A wonderful reimagining of one of Hisaishi's best works, with a nice balance of faithfulness (in spirit to the original piece) and originality. Will you post a video of you playing this? Would be very cool to see your fingers in action.
Heya, I'd love to one day but not currently in the works. I'd like to focus on writing music for now. Thank you for your comment!
ohhh
편곡 센스있게 잘하시네요.. 잘듣고갑니다 ;)
리얼쉣
Bravo!!!
Thanks so much!
Kapustin's 8th sonata reference :)
one of my fav sonata after no. 1 and 2 :)
2:57 쇼스타코비치 왈츠2번 같네요.
노리신건가요..!?
excelente gracias
OMG YAYYYY
Would you ever post a video of yourself playing any of your arrangements?
this is soo tasty i could eat my screen
I want to give you an idea. Make *Fukashigi No Carte **_(From "Seishun Buta Yarou Wa Bunny Girl Senpai No Yume Wo Minai")_* in the style of Nikolai Kapustin or in the genre of jazz. In general, everything is as you like)
I wonder what woul have happened if Cziffra made a paraphrase on this
Can u show the tutorial like on piano pls? I rlly want to learn thiss but hard to read the scriptt :
ハウル！
This reminds me to "piano fantasia" an album for piano solo from the anime saint seiya, here an example: ua-cam.com/video/lDKd8r1nkLE/v-deo.html
The original song is the opening from saint seiya, pegasus fantasy, it would be nice if you make arrangements like this of movie songs
Thanks for sharing! It sounds pretty cool, might try out if I have time
😶
Hey bro, I don't want to shit unnecessarily on this because it's great, and your music is generally great, but listening to it, I can't help but feel like it's all variation on the theme, with the theme never actually being introduced. I'm not sure, if I didn't already know this song's source material, I would really "get" all of your rhythmic inflections. Surely at least the first time the theme appears it shouldn't be so heavily rubato-feeling like it is here.
I don't know your creative process, but I know I've made (what I consider to be) similar mistakes when I have introduced so much variation into a piece I'm writing, I realise that the variation is not for my first-time listeners, but for me, who knows the piece very well, and thus enjoys creative variations upon its themes. The listeners aren't familiar with these themes, so the resulting interpretation/variation can just sound like musical weirdness and awkward tempo changes, because they don't have the grounding of having just heard the unaltered (or barely-altered) theme. It feels to me like you're doing this too, but maybe I'm wrong in that assumption.
If you happen to know someone who has never heard the original you could even test this theory!
My point is, the bulk of this is musically great, but at least from where I'm standing, it's hard not to hear this phenomenon, and it does overshadow the great work you've done somewhat.
I don't mean to criticise your piece in its entirety. Its not bad at all, and you have a lot of other good music out there, but I hope that you'll be able to get what I mean by all this and hear what I'm noticing. I'd be interested to know if you are able to see what I mean!
P.S. This isn't meant to be rude or pressurising or hateful. You're literally the only channel on youtube I have alerts turned on for. Compose however you want! Ignore this if you want! I'm just here to listen to cool music every 3-6 months. :)
(to clarify, this is not hate
Hey Hipsnowsis, huge thanks for your insights :)
You are 100% correct in saying that many of my arrangements sound like a variation of a theme with itself never being introduced, because that is intentional; it is just my style of arranging.
From my experience, there are couple philosophies when it comes to arranging piano music. One of them is to arrange a theme/melody with minimal change to keep it as close to the original and be familiar, and then insert artists’ own twists and flairs which define the arranger/channel style. This is normally how it’s done by the majority of UA-cam channels.
The other philosophy is to take an idea and completely transforming it to something new, often still quite familiar, but also sometimes almost unrecognizable to a degree. I prefer to arrange this way. My idea of a “good” arrangement is one that does not sound like an arrangement, but rather like an original piece. It should stand on its own, without needing to rely on the original source.
I personally think arrangers should strive to make an arrangement truly personal, and the ‘popular method’ of arranging simply isn’t quite enough for me to be satisfied with the end result. I think the more thought and development you give to an arrangement, the more reason it gives purpose to its existence. There may be thousands of similar arrangements in the theme of Howl’s moving castle, but i can point to my arrangement and confidently say, that is my version.
But I understand why people don’t like to do this method (transforming an arrangement to something brand new). Many listeners would be alienated by your arrangement, and hence not popular, and therefore you get the idea that the arrangement is bad/a mistake. But I just don’t think that is true.
When you said “I have introduced so much variations into a piece I’m writing”, I do not necessarily consider that a mistake. Whether it’s good depends on how you develop that variation, and if it changed so much into something unrecognizable, so be it! As long as it sounds good to you.
When you said “I realise the variation is not for my first-time listeners but for me”, that is good! My motto is to never try to appease your listeners. What’s more important is a to accurately portray your personal artistic expression. I think as long as you think it’s good, it’s good. Write for yourself, not for the listener. Because there will ALWAYS be fans out there who will like for your creative decisions.
In the end, there never is a correct answer to how to “arrange” for piano music, and the popular method of arranging is not by any means ‘wrong’ or that mine is right. This is simply my personal thought on what I think an arrangement should be like, and I still stand by it. I do not agree with your sentiment and critique, but that may be because my philosophy of arranging is different from yours. I hope you understand!
PS there is nothing rude about your comments. I really do appreciate your thoughts. Thank you :)
PPS goddamit I really need to start arranging some music. Sorry, it will come soon.
@@hesangasong This all makes sense! I think we may be taking a slightly different approach in defining what the ideal arrangement is - my instinct is to make any arrangements I make sound like pieces I would have been happy to release as standalone compositions (obviously copyright but like, my point is I don't want enjoyment of my arrangement to rely on prior knowledge of the source material) - if someone could listen to it having never heard the original and still be able to appreciate everything just as much as someone who had. IMO it feels more like your arrangements are designed as (for lack of a more appropriate term) 'accessories' to their originals - they are designed to effect the listener with the benefit of the context of the original, almost as if they're some sort of sequel to the original.
I'm not saying that's what you intentionally do, but that at least is perhaps what might lead me away from this technique, while leading you towards it. It's certainly not a bad thing - it's a lot easier to understand the choices you've made with the context of this message.
@@hipsnowsis7374 hmm, I think there is some confusion here, because my aim IS to make arrangements standalone. And certainly make it stand on its own and not rely on the original source, which I think i clearly mentioned? I definitely do not want my arrangement to sound subservient - it should sound like an original piece.
I think I may have misunderstood your first comment. Your second paragraph implied that arranging that is too “out there” is a mistake, so I thought you preferred to arrange in a style that is familiar and close to the original source, hence not as standalone.
So in fact, we do have the same goal in mind and I completely stand by your side.
Regardless, if there is any point in my arrangement that does sound like ‘just an arrangement’, musical weirdness, or subservient etc, then you would be correct in saying it is lackluster.
I guess I only disagree with you when you said you didn’t agree with the first theme introduction having a heavily rubato-feeling section. Imo it acts as a prelude and a preparation to the ‘real’ theme that comes later. I think it’s fine as it is, which is of course my subjective opinion.
So yeah.. I think i may have misunderstood your initial comment, sorry for the confusion.