I read that Mozart preferred a reverb time of 1.9s in performance halls and these types of measures were in use for building, when a building had longer ambient reverberation the performers of the time would choose accordingly, bach in turn preferred a longer reverb because his music was often less staccato then Mozart. I prefer to use those measures more so then just a random ear and random room displacement. In the old days of recording they would place the recorded sound in a room to gather convolution information of course, I wonder why they wouldn't play the audio on a stage in today's world before applying those settings. If I was in your shoes I would prefer to do all my work on a stage, imagine that, mastering music as if you are the performer. That would make music breathe again, it's gotten so dry and stale and lack of room sound.
Very interested to know what you do when you have a mix that is just to busy,to many tracks, but I don't want to get rid of any of the sounds they all fit and sound good but there is just to much going on at once, my remedy was to play different tracks at different intervals but then it don't sound right, I was wondering what you do when faced with this delema? 39 tracks is a bit to many for me. Thanks
You can tell he knows about audio because of his terrible shirt ;)
Nah, it's all about the collar-less shirt, bro.
i fw his shirt
I read that Mozart preferred a reverb time of 1.9s in performance halls and these types of measures were in use for building, when a building had longer ambient reverberation the performers of the time would choose accordingly, bach in turn preferred a longer reverb because his music was often less staccato then Mozart. I prefer to use those measures more so then just a random ear and random room displacement. In the old days of recording they would place the recorded sound in a room to gather convolution information of course, I wonder why they wouldn't play the audio on a stage in today's world before applying those settings. If I was in your shoes I would prefer to do all my work on a stage, imagine that, mastering music as if you are the performer. That would make music breathe again, it's gotten so dry and stale and lack of room sound.
Great videos. Sense of depth is exactly what I'm missing in my music.
Let's talk about the unison ad where the genius specimen says, "my inspiration is just comin and flowin." Yeah it's great. Musical genius there.
Thanks! :)
I haven't used reverb in a stereo mastering session (except for track tails) for about 5 years.
Hey, Jon. What's your prefered software reverb?
i am following you, just continue talking :-)
Very interested to know what you do when you have a mix that is just to busy,to many tracks, but I don't want to get rid of any of the sounds they all fit and sound good but there is just to much going on at once, my remedy was to play different tracks at different intervals but then it don't sound right, I was wondering what you do when faced with this delema? 39 tracks is a bit to many for me. Thanks
nice man, thanks
Thank You :)
cool stuff :)
You know your stuff!
do you add your reverb before or after the limiter?
Before
thanks