Lec 28: Divergence theorem | MIT 18.02 Multivariable Calculus, Fall 2007

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 18 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 56

  • @mj_friedman
    @mj_friedman 9 років тому +61

    20:00 "There are many paraboloids in life" ~Auroux

  • @navs8603
    @navs8603 5 років тому +13

    Someone please give a medal to Prof. Auroux. Genius indeed how he closed the lecture with Divergence...

  • @lucastorres12
    @lucastorres12 11 років тому +33

    I love when he erases the blackboard.

  • @PoliticalGallivant
    @PoliticalGallivant 11 років тому +11

    Man, I miss calculus! So good to see these lectures!

  • @DoggoWillink
    @DoggoWillink 12 років тому +2

    @shakesbeer00 The parabola doesn't matter in terms of bounds because we know it becomes the unit circle in the xy plane. The double integral cares only about the xy plane, and so that's all you need to know in order to set up the integral.

  • @alexhudson502
    @alexhudson502 2 роки тому

    Lecture 1: Dot Product
    Lecture 2: Determinants
    Lecture 3: Matrices
    Lecture 4: Square Systems
    Lecture 5: Parametric Equations
    Lecture 6: Kepler's Second Law
    Lecture 7: Exam Review (goes over practice exam 1a at 24 min 40 seconds)
    Lecture 8: Partial Derivatives
    Lecture 9: Max-Min and Least Squares
    Lecture 10: Second Derivative Test
    Lecture 11: Chain Rule
    Lecture 12: Gradient
    Lecture 13: Lagrange Multipliers
    Lecture 14: Non-Independent Variables
    Lecture 15: Partial Differential Equations
    Lecture 16: Double Integrals
    Lecture 17: Polar Coordinates
    Lecture 18: Change of Variables
    Lecture 19: Vector Fields
    Lecture 20: Path Independence
    Lecture 21: Gradient Fields
    Lecture 22: Green's Theorem
    Lecture 23: Flux
    Lecture 24: Simply Connected Regions
    Lecture 25: Triple Integrals
    Lecture 26: Spherical Coordinates
    Lecture 27: Vector Fields in 3D
    Lecture 28: Divergence Theorem
    Lecture 29: Divergence Theorem (cont.)
    Lecture 30: Line Integrals
    Lecture 31: Stokes' Theorem
    Lecture 32: Stokes' Theorem (cont.)
    Lecture 33: Maxwell's Equations
    Lecture 34: Final Review
    Lecture 35: Final Review (cont.)

  • @dannyhuang6773
    @dannyhuang6773 Рік тому

    that source minus sink analogy is really intuitive at the end

  • @hmpcon
    @hmpcon 14 років тому +11

    Why can't Cornell professors be this good?

  • @denden4455
    @denden4455 3 роки тому

    The best math teacher

  • @alexandruguja3139
    @alexandruguja3139 9 років тому +9

    Do maths/science/engineering students take this class or some other multivariable calculus course like 18.024?

    • @cantfindagoodchannelname7359
      @cantfindagoodchannelname7359 3 роки тому +1

      In India engineers/physics students take a course like this and maths studenst atke 18.024

    • @SPRINGGREEN813
      @SPRINGGREEN813 5 місяців тому

      @@cantfindagoodchannelname7359 Which institute bro?

  • @tsukurinikuimono
    @tsukurinikuimono 14 років тому +2

    yeah this guy is great!
    great stuff...
    regards from australia!

  • @debendragurung3033
    @debendragurung3033 7 років тому +3

    Thanks for the proof of nds = dxdy

  • @shakesbeer00
    @shakesbeer00 12 років тому +1

    18:09 why the range of r goes from 0 to 1? I think the definition of S in this problem needs further clarification. S should be a paraboloid of z = x^2 + y^2 between z=0 and z=1. It is a little confusing by justing saying "above the unit disk".

  • @nikan4now
    @nikan4now 14 років тому +2

    Great lecture. Thanks for uploading.

  • @soumahakase7124
    @soumahakase7124 4 роки тому

    Splendid lecture.

  • @Siltua
    @Siltua 8 років тому +1

    Wait, did he ever account for vector N not being a unit vector? He never required that the N vector represented the area of the delta slanted plane did he?

    • @agingerrail123
      @agingerrail123 8 років тому

      In the formula, N appears both on top and on the bottom it is not necessary for vector N to be a unit vector.

  • @abbasbookwala
    @abbasbookwala 3 роки тому

    I did not understand the last step replacing dA by dxdy. The proof contained slanted plane with an angle alpha to only one axis and not a general slant in both directions. Does this proof apply when we are considering a general slant to both x and y ? Will dA=dS Cos theta still be applicable?

    • @nickkong5754
      @nickkong5754 2 роки тому

      Remember that dA is the shadow of dS, so dx and dy are the dimensions of dA.

  • @imegatrone
    @imegatrone 13 років тому +1

    I Really Like The Video Divergence theorem. From Your

  • @famousfamos
    @famousfamos 13 років тому +3

    my lecturer covered this topic within 10 powerpoint slides-.-

  • @not_amanullah
    @not_amanullah 5 місяців тому

    This is helpful ❤️🤍

  • @DoggoWillink
    @DoggoWillink 12 років тому

    @shakesbeer00 Because it's over the unit circle.

  • @metalroolz21
    @metalroolz21 14 років тому +7

    One person disliked this video because he realized once 3d flux was explained excellently he still didn't understand it

  • @not_amanullah
    @not_amanullah 5 місяців тому

    Thanks ❤

  • @coreconceptclasses7494
    @coreconceptclasses7494 5 років тому +6

    MIT plz provides lecture of real analysis...

    • @antikomunis886
      @antikomunis886 5 років тому

      He is vector analysis lecturer. He can't teach other subject.

    • @proghostbusters1627
      @proghostbusters1627 4 роки тому +6

      @@antikomunis886 1) His field of research is mainly topology 2) He can propably teach most math classes 3) He didn't ask for real analysis classes specifically by Auroux

  • @antonijmijoski
    @antonijmijoski 8 років тому

    Isn't this theorem called after Ostrogradsky, since he is the first one to prove it?

    • @eecakir
      @eecakir 7 років тому +4

      yeah but pronunciation issues rose, so they changed it to divergence theorem, instead of ostorgradagsaskgsy

    • @bestest43
      @bestest43 7 років тому +1

      Antonij Mijoski why the fuck u care this man?? Jesus fcking christ, are u disrespecting Sir John Denis Auroux????

  • @mo0f
    @mo0f 14 років тому

    @hmpcon you have kassabov?

  • @aboodalmashni6085
    @aboodalmashni6085 3 роки тому

    43:00

  • @charleetje
    @charleetje 13 років тому

    This is not on the divergence theorem..

  • @videofountain
    @videofountain 6 років тому

    Finally at ua-cam.com/video/WfEQabCGAqI/v-deo.htmlm10s the professor has a moment of joy. Interesting how he chooses to explain using either the phases or

  • @dannybear8222
    @dannybear8222 10 років тому +2

    Am I the only one to feel that cameraman is obsessed with zooming in things? That's really annoying - I am more confident in his camera('s resolution w/o zooming) than he is...

    • @Ramix09
      @Ramix09 8 років тому +2

      +Danny Bear Maybe his dream was to be a proffesional cameraman and he just loves to zoom in stuff dramatically (31:01)

  • @Rkmath-gq5nq
    @Rkmath-gq5nq 6 років тому

    When you clear black board sir awesome

  • @Dra60oN
    @Dra60oN 7 років тому +1

    32:22 :D

    • @KobZen
      @KobZen 5 років тому

      I loled so hard :'D

  • @txelcat
    @txelcat 14 років тому

    lol @ 32:20 and the class reaction...

  • @ankitseth8371
    @ankitseth8371 6 років тому

    Nice

  • @joebrinson5040
    @joebrinson5040 2 роки тому

    Mmore Olympic erasing by Denis Auroux!!

  • @HotPepperLala
    @HotPepperLala 13 років тому

    32:28 I think he missed...

  • @Rkmath-gq5nq
    @Rkmath-gq5nq 6 років тому

    After 25 minute lecture I not understand what you have done,please sir explain it

  • @stanleycurtis6140
    @stanleycurtis6140 3 роки тому

    He teach me how to draw

  • @LeonardoKasperzioni
    @LeonardoKasperzioni 12 років тому

    sorry to disappoint you but it's d(sigma) not dS. that MIT guy needs a reanimation.

  • @paulwittekind5071
    @paulwittekind5071 5 років тому

    This guy needs to take an English course.

    • @atehortuajf
      @atehortuajf 4 роки тому +8

      imagine thinking having an accent means you don't know the language

    • @JD-sz5js
      @JD-sz5js 2 місяці тому

      Four years late but as a native English speaker, he speaks flawless English

    • @hetaeramancer
      @hetaeramancer Місяць тому

      @@atehortuajf yeah, common misconception of people who only know 1 language, pathetic monolinguals...

  • @hdheuejhzbsnnaj
    @hdheuejhzbsnnaj 2 роки тому

    Please @mitopencourseware. Please label each video with the content covered in the video! I'm begging you!