Wow Jackie is really an amazing person. He puts so much understanding about the work of the pilot in an F1 car now and then that is strikingly respectful and insightful. When many ppl (even some pilots) talk about f1's differences between eras they never consider all the additional work a racer has to do in addition to all the "crapy" technology added in the car in comparison to before, so if it is an advantage it is not w/o as price. The fact that he can understand Kimi's ways and mentality in such debt is also very amazing. I've heard so many ppl and so called experts to just describing Raikkonen as a egocentric bully with a lot of problematic issues, when the truth is different. He is a great driver and fantastic to work with, at least what all his teams technical personal say about him. As Sir Jackie states "He is a very special person". xD But it's very amazing I think, that a driver from a completely different generation way way before can understand and analyze the technology looking it through so many different angles and concepts. And personally to him, to can understand the mentality and the way s/o is who is very different and specific as a person is admiring.
Jackie stewart is still one of the all time legends ! back in his day, the driver had one hand on the wheel and the other on the gearshifter. today it's one on the wheel and the other on the buttons....
"I like Kimi alot, but I can't count him as a friend. Because I'm not sure that he has many friends. The friends that he brings along, are pretty unusual people" Dudesons in Monte Carlo.
I´m finnish and many here don´t believe in Kimi...sadly. For me, Kimi is one of the most talented drivers since Senna´s time and brings alot to F1 due to his abnormal personality
I love this coment from a icon as Jackie Stewart he have Kimi as a fan for his personaly and that is somthing you or media never can change !!! That is somthing !! Stop your shit talk and all is good i do what i do best drive my car to the limit what it can preform thats it !!!!!! LOVE You Kimi Do what you do Thats it !!!!
i'm agree with u, the cars are really similar now, in 80's there were only 2 teams good, the others were bullshit. then the pilots now are starting karting or minibike at 5 yo ( ex: Valentino Rossi ), Prost discovered karting at 14, at 14 a skilled motorbike driver make the debut in 125cc or Moto 1. 10 years of career is the difference, is incredible how mature are the pilots today.
Let me remind you: In 1990 Senna intentionally crashed Prost off the track at the first corner. Yes, the Ferrari was quicker that year, but unreliable, which made it worse. In 1991 it was just the same thing with Williams. Their car was faster and technologically more advanced. However, this made the car less reliable and this lack of reliablility made it a worse care than the Mclaren in total. Having the fastest car doesn't mean the best car. It was the same story in 2005 with Kimi and Mclaren.
I'd love to see that as well. The point is: Senna also only won his titles in the fastest car of the grid. It's quite normal. Of course he performed brilliantly in the slower cars as well but so did Vettel in 2008. You can't judge Vettel for the fact that he keeps his seat at the fastest team. It's only logical he does that. What is he supposed to do? Move to Caterham and defeat the other driver? You can't blame Vettel really.
Because he's had the fastest car in every instance. You have to move teams and continue to win to convince the sceptical people. I love Vettel and think he's a huge talent. But I'd like to see Kimi join him at Red Bull next season as a direct comparrison. If Kimi joins and Seb keeps winning, which I think will be extremely close. Then we'll know he's a phenomenal driver and even the Kimi fans will have to admit it, if he consistantly beats their man.
if u know the simulators like GPL or iRacing the handling was easier, 300-400 CV, soft springs, take the apex gently, really different from the hard setting in the era of ground effect with nervous cars, button or not, an ass cannot win. the only think is the fuel, potentially the cars were esplosive tanks running at 200 km/h.
Its kinda weird that someone who sucks has 20 victories, 73 podiums, 16 pole positions and 38 fastest laps (only Prost and Schumacher have more fastest laps). I don't see the relation between your argument and your examples. What does his performance on track have to do with the way he is off track?
Wow, Ur really "out there". "struggling to beat Grosjean"? Just check the drivers standings. Well, as for German GP, Grosjean should have let Kimi past about 5 laps before and Kimi would have overtaked Vettel. 5 laps that costed him the win.
Senna's dominance in qualifying didn't always last in the race. He often qualified with less fuel which gave him the edge in qualifying. In the race he wasn't as dominant. Vettel simply can't go three seconds faster than anyone because the field has become much more competetive, whether you like it or not. You're Senna fanboyism is really getting on my nerves. Can't you see your own hypocrisy?
Well, I guess Ur one of those guys who is really thinking big...with a small mind. Just to make a point here: Kimi was on softs and Romain on mediums..and Romain needed 2 messages to let kimi pass...what happened when he finally let Kimi pass..Kimi disappeared from Romain's sight. But it was too late..exactly 5 laps too late. well U keep on thinking big...even when U have no idea what ur talking about. Just to make things clear: how many times has alonso asked Massa to let him pass? Think big.
I bet you can't even give one good reason why Senna was faster. Furthermore, you can't compare two eras. I'm not saying Senna was slow. He probably was one of the fastest of his time, if not the fastest (although I've always thought of Prost as an equally good racing driver). I'm just saying that you simply can't know whether Senna was faster because there is no direct comparison. Shouting around he definetly was is just stupid.
No you dont, its a logical fallacy to predict something like this on observations like these lol... I doubt someone as bright as senna or anyone really, would say Raikkonen, a world champion that could easily be 3 times world champion right now, sucks at all. He has his own style, if he doesnt care for what hes doing hes not going to perform up to standard, just as anyone, but when he tried he almost won 3 titles had it not been for the car.And now hes back with a bang lol. Dont be silly.
Look up your facts, boy. Everyone knows that the Ferrari was way more unreliable than the Mclaren. Same goes with the Williams. By the way, you don't have to drop out of the race when you have a problem. It does slow you down though.
He also appreciated Schumacher, bet you hate him. But the last thing you could call Räikkönen is inconsistent, mediocre and undisciplined. He has been in the fight for the title all the years he has been racing in f1 except the first year and som of the years when the McLaren broke 1/2 of the races. No one has ever in modern time done a comeback after several years and had that much WC points. You speak of pure ignorance. Senna would be ashamed of you as his fan.
And there is lot of finnish who shame kimi. Coz he is drinks and does not hide it, anwsers fot journalist are sometimes strange and rude. Finnish have loww selfesteem. we shame ourselves.
So you are defending him in every way even tough he isn't spoken of? Because you are his pit girl? It's really annoying, you senna fans always comes to every video and talk about him like there is no one other. Please stop this childish behavior,
I'm not saying it was more difficult now or then. was just pointing out the difference between the cars from back then and now. don't like the computer controlled bullshit these days
U keep on talking about "logic", well dude keep on thinking big. I at least have passed logics course in Uni. Is "ergo" the only latin word U know? I'm at least smart enough to understand when to stop arguing, when I see that arguing with U is as usefull as arguing with a brickwall. Take care.
Dont be silly, you havent showed anything in your arguments other than delusion, perhaps youd think that you can win an arguments via consistency through delusion but anyone can keep going and going, the difference here is that im right lol. You give no reason to think you are smart lol, quite the opposite. Raikkonen is a world championship winning driver, "not a serious sportman at all" i cant care less for your definitions lol, Raikkonen is a great driver, AND..u got pwned LOL.
Overrated people do become three times world champion when they're rated higher by most than a five/seven times world champion. Vettel drives awesomely fast and has 3 titles as well. Yet he's rated lower by most than Senna. I can't see why.
You obviously are stuck in the past. I'd suggest to you to see a psychiatrist for your nostalgic disorder. You're blaming others to be fanboys while you're the biggest fanboy yourself. Get a grip man. Give me one good reason why Senna was more talented than Schumi, Vettel, Prost...
Jackie and Kimi, both legends.
Wow Jackie is really an amazing person. He puts so much understanding about the work of the pilot in an F1 car now and then that is strikingly respectful and insightful. When many ppl (even some pilots) talk about f1's differences between eras they never consider all the additional work a racer has to do in addition to all the "crapy" technology added in the car in comparison to before, so if it is an advantage it is not w/o as price. The fact that he can understand Kimi's ways and mentality in such debt is also very amazing. I've heard so many ppl and so called experts to just describing Raikkonen as a egocentric bully with a lot of problematic issues, when the truth is different. He is a great driver and fantastic to work with, at least what all his teams technical personal say about him. As Sir Jackie states "He is a very special person". xD
But it's very amazing I think, that a driver from a completely different generation way way before can understand and analyze the technology looking it through so many different angles and concepts. And personally to him, to can understand the mentality and the way s/o is who is very different and specific as a person is admiring.
Thank you for all these videos....
Jackie stewart is still one of the all time legends !
back in his day, the driver had one hand on the wheel and the other on the gearshifter. today it's one on the wheel and the other on the buttons....
"I like Kimi alot, but I can't count him as a friend. Because I'm not sure that he has many friends. The friends that he brings along, are pretty unusual people"
Dudesons in Monte Carlo.
"He is very special person" XD
Here is so many jealous people and they insult Kimi. But Kimi is the best!
I´m finnish and many here don´t believe in Kimi...sadly. For me, Kimi is one of the most talented drivers since Senna´s time and brings alot to F1 due to his abnormal personality
When ever I see jackie I think about senna saying "if you no longer go for a gap you no longer a racing driver"
Not to mention an all time F1 record of consecutive point scoring.
Simply the BEST!!!
He's Scottish remember? and he's always had them tartan trousers since his Stewart GP days way back in 1997.
It's Kimi!
Come on, Finland is great, our nordic brothers!
I love this coment from a icon as Jackie Stewart he have Kimi as a fan for his personaly and that is somthing you or media never can change !!! That is somthing !! Stop your shit talk and all is good i do what i do best drive my car to the limit what it can preform thats it !!!!!! LOVE You Kimi Do what you do Thats it !!!!
i'm agree with u, the cars are really similar now, in 80's there were only 2 teams good, the others were bullshit.
then the pilots now are starting karting or minibike at 5 yo ( ex: Valentino Rossi ), Prost discovered karting at 14, at 14 a skilled motorbike driver make the debut in 125cc or Moto 1.
10 years of career is the difference, is incredible how mature are the pilots today.
does any know about his trouses Stewart i mean
Let me remind you: In 1990 Senna intentionally crashed Prost off the track at the first corner. Yes, the Ferrari was quicker that year, but unreliable, which made it worse. In 1991 it was just the same thing with Williams. Their car was faster and technologically more advanced. However, this made the car less reliable and this lack of reliablility made it a worse care than the Mclaren in total. Having the fastest car doesn't mean the best car. It was the same story in 2005 with Kimi and Mclaren.
totally agree ^^ :)
I'd love to see that as well. The point is: Senna also only won his titles in the fastest car of the grid. It's quite normal. Of course he performed brilliantly in the slower cars as well but so did Vettel in 2008. You can't judge Vettel for the fact that he keeps his seat at the fastest team. It's only logical he does that. What is he supposed to do? Move to Caterham and defeat the other driver? You can't blame Vettel really.
Because he's had the fastest car in every instance. You have to move teams and continue to win to convince the sceptical people.
I love Vettel and think he's a huge talent. But I'd like to see Kimi join him at Red Bull next season as a direct comparrison. If Kimi joins and Seb keeps winning, which I think will be extremely close. Then we'll know he's a phenomenal driver and even the Kimi fans will have to admit it, if he consistantly beats their man.
if u know the simulators like GPL or iRacing
the handling was easier, 300-400 CV, soft springs, take the apex gently, really different from the hard setting in the era of ground effect with nervous cars, button or not, an ass cannot win.
the only think is the fuel, potentially the cars were esplosive tanks running at 200 km/h.
Its kinda weird that someone who sucks has 20 victories, 73 podiums, 16 pole positions and 38 fastest laps (only Prost and Schumacher have more fastest laps).
I don't see the relation between your argument and your examples. What does his performance on track have to do with the way he is off track?
Wow, Ur really "out there". "struggling to beat Grosjean"? Just check the drivers standings. Well, as for German GP, Grosjean should have let Kimi past about 5 laps before and Kimi would have overtaked Vettel. 5 laps that costed him the win.
His comeback was better than Michael's, alright, but the fact is Kimi's car was way better than the Mercedes crap Schumi had.
Senna's dominance in qualifying didn't always last in the race. He often qualified with less fuel which gave him the edge in qualifying. In the race he wasn't as dominant. Vettel simply can't go three seconds faster than anyone because the field has become much more competetive, whether you like it or not. You're Senna fanboyism is really getting on my nerves. Can't you see your own hypocrisy?
Rising? he's one of the oldest in the field...Along with Button & Webber.
Fun fact. Kimi is also dyslexic
Well, I guess Ur one of those guys who is really thinking big...with a small mind. Just to make a point here: Kimi was on softs and Romain on mediums..and Romain needed 2 messages to let kimi pass...what happened when he finally let Kimi pass..Kimi disappeared from Romain's sight. But it was too late..exactly 5 laps too late. well U keep on thinking big...even when U have no idea what ur talking about. Just to make things clear: how many times has alonso asked Massa to let him pass? Think big.
I bet you can't even give one good reason why Senna was faster. Furthermore, you can't compare two eras. I'm not saying Senna was slow. He probably was one of the fastest of his time, if not the fastest (although I've always thought of Prost as an equally good racing driver). I'm just saying that you simply can't know whether Senna was faster because there is no direct comparison. Shouting around he definetly was is just stupid.
Right, that's enough. Fuck you.
No you dont, its a logical fallacy to predict something like this on observations like these lol...
I doubt someone as bright as senna or anyone really, would say Raikkonen, a world champion that could easily be 3 times world champion right now, sucks at all.
He has his own style, if he doesnt care for what hes doing hes not going to perform up to standard, just as anyone, but when he tried he almost won 3 titles had it not been for the car.And now hes back with a bang lol.
Dont be silly.
How can you say people in Finland doesn't believe in Kimi?
I thought the Finns loved Kimi?
Look up your facts, boy. Everyone knows that the Ferrari was way more unreliable than the Mclaren. Same goes with the Williams. By the way, you don't have to drop out of the race when you have a problem. It does slow you down though.
He also appreciated Schumacher, bet you hate him. But the last thing you could call Räikkönen is inconsistent, mediocre and undisciplined. He has been in the fight for the title all the years he has been racing in f1 except the first year and som of the years when the McLaren broke 1/2 of the races. No one has ever in modern time done a comeback after several years and had that much WC points. You speak of pure ignorance. Senna would be ashamed of you as his fan.
What has happened in this comment section..? 😦
And there is lot of finnish who shame kimi. Coz he is drinks and does not hide it, anwsers fot journalist are sometimes strange and rude. Finnish have loww selfesteem. we shame ourselves.
Look up overrated in the dictionary, and you'll find a photo of Ayrton Senna.
So you are defending him in every way even tough he isn't spoken of? Because you are his pit girl? It's really annoying, you senna fans always comes to every video and talk about him like there is no one other. Please stop this childish behavior,
I'm not saying it was more difficult now or then. was just pointing out the difference between the cars from back then and now. don't like the computer controlled bullshit these days
U keep on talking about "logic", well dude keep on thinking big. I at least have passed logics course in Uni. Is "ergo" the only latin word U know? I'm at least smart enough to understand when to stop arguing, when I see that arguing with U is as usefull as arguing with a brickwall. Take care.
aaaaaaaaahahahahahaaaaaaaaa
And yet your nick name is BIGGER THINKER . Let me guess, everyone are shit compared to Senna? Senna was a big man who appreciated others talant.
most of us are idiots
Bigger thinker obviously cant read, or think . . .
ferrari disliked
Dont be silly, you havent showed anything in your arguments other than delusion, perhaps youd think that you can win an arguments via consistency through delusion but anyone can keep going and going, the difference here is that im right lol.
You give no reason to think you are smart lol, quite the opposite.
Raikkonen is a world championship winning driver, "not a serious sportman at all" i cant care less for your definitions lol, Raikkonen is a great driver, AND..u got pwned LOL.
Overrated people do become three times world champion when they're rated higher by most than a five/seven times world champion. Vettel drives awesomely fast and has 3 titles as well. Yet he's rated lower by most than Senna. I can't see why.
You obviously are stuck in the past. I'd suggest to you to see a psychiatrist for your nostalgic disorder. You're blaming others to be fanboys while you're the biggest fanboy yourself. Get a grip man. Give me one good reason why Senna was more talented than Schumi, Vettel, Prost...