WTC Simulation 2.0 Announcement [8K]
Вставка
- Опубліковано 9 вер 2021
- To improve building designs you need to understand their behavior. 10 years ago there was a first simulation attempt of the top of the north tower uploaded to this channel. 6 years ago this led to the opportunity to develop a new software for structural simulation within a scientific environment. And now is a good time to put the Bullet Constraints Builder to the ultimate test... Stay tuned!
inachuslaurea.wordpress.com - Фільми й анімація
![Condo Collapse Simulation | Champlain Towers South Surfside, Florida, Miami [8K]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/HPwJ0JvTcg8/mqdefault.jpg)
It's good you are including the basin in this simulation, many forget there was an entire building complex below the towers
@@mtm4a Actually I'm more thinking about how damage of the basement superstructure could have affected other buildings within the basin after the first collapse. I know some of you are still keen on finding the magic evidence of George Bush's fingerprints on the boxes of thermite, but the reality is that a shed ton of metal and rubble hit the streets of Manhattan, causing damage that could have even crippled the entire subway network for years.
@@laurencebois5119 it did cripple the subway network. That segment was disused for a long time
@@Freshbott2 I think the civil engineers were concerned about flooding the subway network with river water if the basin suffered a critical failure where the shore line used to be, that's the situation I was meaning when I said crippled
@@baz_1239 HP
@@mtm4a Horse Poo - As I thought...
After coming back to rewatch this video for the nth time, I noticed some inconsistencies in the representation of the tower. They're quite subtle but could still make the simulation less accurate (as if I'm the one to say). It could be that I'm wrong and you had access to more blueprints than me, in which case I would be very glad to be told what I'm wrong about!
But nonetheless:
-It seems that you've misplaced the 41st floor mechanical level (in the video it's on the 40th floor instead),
-Some floors in the North Tower, primarily the 67th floor and the skylobbies, were taller than the rest, at 16' and 14' respectively, while in the video all floors seem to be the same size,
-There were no columns at the corners above the 106th floor as far as I'm aware (so the restaurant floor and the last mechanical floors),
-There were corner columns, however, on the 7th and 9th floors that are not present in the video,
-There was a spandrel plate midway up the upper lobby windows on all corners which, again, is not visible in the video.
Some other minor details that are most likely purely visual are the fact that the columns at the restaurant floor tapered down a bit (as seen on the South Tower in the background), which is weirdly not present on North Tower, the windows on the 9th floor were as tall as on all other 12' tall floors, while in the video they seem a bit short and the corner columns appear to have been placed on the inside-facing sides of the spandrel plates, while in the video they're facing outside.
Hopefully it doesn't seem like I'm being a giant douche trying to tell someone else what's right and what's wrong or being overly critical, but that's just what I noticed as I'm very excited to see the final video! It will be awesome!
Nerd
@@johns8902 I'm taking that as a compliment! :D
@@TheFenX2012 The attn to the detail is amazing!! And I surely wear my nerd badge proudly! 😎
Thanks, you are right, there are still some inaccuracies that can be improved, even though I don't believe they will have much impact on the overall result.
@@KaiKostack
Of coarse not, you've already expressed/ displayed, you couldn't be bothered with details.
Don’t give up on your project. I like to see your WTC simulation.
Wow, i remember the first simulation that you did like 10 years ago. Looking forward into this! #NeverForget ❤️
@michael swanson stfu bill.
9/11 9/11 9/11
There are gonna be a lot of conspiracy theorists in the comment section but you have to remember that you're doing great
It's not even a conspiracy anymore
Bullet engine ≠ real physics.
@@dylanhaze1455 cardboard engine ≠ real physics
@@EricStone87you conspiracy nuts still think that the tower was a case of controlled demolition?
@@cranksetwrench dude you are hideous
“Coming soon” even though it’s been 2 years
I remember the one you made awhile ago and being amazed! I am really curious to see the update! Thank you for your hard work.
I look forward to see your results. So far they've been remarkable.
Wow, seems like a lot of work
Cant wait to see the result !
when should we expect this to come out?
Will you ever do 2WTC? I’d love to see that as well. Eventually do a big compilation of all 3 from that day
Wow, Please include as many camera angles as you can as well as possibly some angles that were taken in real life, such as the one with msnbc standing next to wtc3 during the south tower collapse. That would be awesome! Could you also add some angles inside different parts of the tower during the collapse?
I'm looking forward to this simulation 👀
Stupid question, but do you have object collision turned on? I watched your original only just tonight and wondered if it would be possible to simulate with object collisions too (so that beams / girders etc don't clip through each other).
Not realising you were doing a follow-up, I actually looked around to see if I could find a blend file of something very similar to test on my 10c/20t 9900X w/ 64GB RAM (noting your original stated 12GB max RAM at the time).
I'm looking forward to the next video.😊
Awesome work you did there man!
1. Could you do a better interior view this time? I mean, not like the previous one where the camera phased through the building, but one where you make the exterior walls invisible?
2. Could you show multiple angles?
3. Will you be simulating the full collapse this time?
Do you have an idea of when that will be finished? Looking forward to it!
People that say its weird how these structures collapsed and are baffled by the small heap of rubble it left behind completely forget that these 2 towers were 95% air due to their design
I say this all the time. Look at pictures of them at night with all the lights on. Buildings are hollow.
They had a core comprising of 47 columns, the core was a building on its own, a building inside the building. That's not %95 air.
@@azmagarefThe core had air inside of it
There were also several basement floors and parking below the towers which also included the mall and PATH station
Looking forward to it!!!
where is it? been two years
Can't wait!!!
Guys, it's still happening. It's just taking a couple years to render :)
Can’t wait to see this! 🔥
How soon can we expect the simulation? and will there be a second simulation of the South tower?
The when is hard to tell, but simulations of both towers are planned.
@@KaiKostack class, would it be likely within the next year lol?
@@maxmccann5323 I still hope to get it finished this year. 🙂
@@KaiKostack what a new year's present that would be haha! Will the textures of the buildings be the same in the final render? Sorry all the questions I'm just pretty excited!
The more angles and filters you show in the final video the better
I'm just wondering, since the south tower collapsed first, is this including the south tower collapse or will the south tower already be shown to have collapsed and caused damage in the simulation? Or will the north tower collapse as if the south tower was still standing? Just curious about that, either way it's going to be awesome
Both towers will be simulated.
How well is it replicating the collapse? Does the top block decelerate or fall off?
R.I.P. to all who have died in 9/11.
Would you consider simulating the plane impact? It's objected that the wings would sheer off rather rip through the facade even out towards the wingtips; I'm curious what it would look like.
Shanksville is another: what fuselage, if any, would be left behind from an impact into the ground at full speed.
Actually, the columns were made of thin steel plate, so it's not that hard to see why the wings went through.
just letting you know, purdue university has done a simulation of flight 11 hitting 1 WTC and the damage before the collapse
Any updates?
Hope you happened to see "Building 7 Explained: Comprehensive Final Edition," which uses your awesome simulation (which you approved several years ago). Can't wait for this one! Let's put an end to this stupid "20 floors could only destroy 20 floors because of Newton's 3rd" nonsense.
Hi Edward and thanks for letting me know about your update. I have watched your video and I think it's excellent. It's a perfect reference that we can point our conspiracy believers to, who are still commenting and complaining under my WTC 7 video every day. ;-)
@@KaiKostack Yeah you also have people thinking that the planes were CGI and that it were explosives that took the towers down.
Let's just not take thousands of eyewitnesses that saw the planes go into the towers into account.
From atomic bombs under the complex to some sort of sci-fi energy weapons, they have every story one can imagine. You'll have to admit that these people are kind of creative at times.
@@KaiKostack Who are "they"?
@@MrKoenig1985 Conspiracy believers.
Sometimes waiting is the hardest thing of all 😅
when will this new video be finished?
I love your videos, especially the 9/11 videos. I’ve been a fan of this channel for five years. I’m hoping for a reply since this is my favorite channel. Keep up the good work and thank you for sharing such amazing videos to the rest of the world👍😃
Thank you for your kind words and loyalty. 🙂
It is a good thing that you are making simulations on buildings 1 and 7, since they are the center of conspiracy theories. Your Champlain Towers simulation proves that there are buildings that have collapsed without planes or fire.
@@KaiKostack Thanks for the feedback😄
is it possible to simulate the whole 9/11 event affecting the entire complex with high level of detail? it can shed a light regarding WTC7 fate, maybe after WTC1 and 2 collapse, it affected WTC7 structure in some unexpected way.
It's fairly accepted that as the North Tower collapsed, the upper floors struck WTC7, and caused structural damage and fires that ultimately led to it's collapse. Normally, WTC7 would have had sprinkler systems in place to deal with the fires, but the pumps and control room for this system was under the main WTC complex, and heavily damaged when the two towers collapsed on top of it.
@@DownundaThunda I'd be interesting to see that in the simulation since the north tower collapsed almost vertically. the south tower did in fact tilted the upper portion when collapsing but the south was farther away from WTC7 than the north was. I'd like to see which tower collapse had the biggest impact on WTC7
@@Mr.President Neither tower collapsed vertically. If you watch the video of the North Tower collapse from the helicopter from the Hudson direction, you can see a large portion of the top of the building falling to WTC7 and hitting it.
And the damage to the hotel indicates that the South Tower fell as much to the west as it did to the east.
Great and amazing job..! ❤
Hi...I'm Brazilian and I've always been in love with the Twin Towers !!!! Even today I get emotional when I see videos, movies and photos on UA-cam of this beautiful structure that is no longer there 😔 !!! He can
I've never traveled to the US, but I've always been curious to know from the Americans themselves the que do you think about it ::the towers would fall with that impact ?? It was horrible to see that gigantic plane entering the building.... Even though it was something dark what happened, I ask :: those
When it will come?
Hi! Waiting for it.
When will it come out
Wow I wish I could have this 3D model id build a Authentic Miniature out of it using real concreate and working lights and everything do you have the Model to download anywhere?
Video in july?
Next can you make a North Tower collapse?
Is it still being worked on?
you gonna do both towers in complete collabse? I would like to see that one!
Definitely the north tower, not sure about the second one though because it's quite similar.
@@KaiKostack actually. The south tower collabse was differend than the north tower. Because it fell at an angle.
I know, but it's not very different in the way how the progressive collapse dynamics act. If you understand one tower then you can imagine the other.
I would just like to see if the south tower effected the north when it fell and how much debris covered the ground below the north. I have always wondered if people who were trying to leave the north tower after the collapse of the south got trapped due to the pile of debris on the exits. It’s hard to see real footage because of all the dust so a simulation would help us better know what happened
@@KaiKostack the conspiracy theorists will be after your head if you don't do the south tower. They will think you're hiding something.
No video this month😞
We can expect a video in February?🏙
Very nice! However, I think you should add holes on the side too since the explosion blast damaged the facades
Yes. There was slices on the side that aren't shown in the animation
What damage to the facades besides broken windows?
@@MrKoenig1985 the blast destroyed the steel of the facade in the position of the airplanes wings.
@@AS-bc9qd Where can I see that? Jet-fuel deflagration can hardly destroy any steel.
In fact, most of the cladding remained attached to the exterior columns on other sides, where fireballs emerged also. Only where the plane and its debris impacted the walls, the steel was damaged and cladding came off.
@@Viscous_Dampers_For_Houses
"You have been pretending to be a 911 truther for many years, we know."
Who are "we"? You and your countless troll accounts with ridiculous and long names?
Funny and disgusting tribalism at same time:
If I say something against Truther "wisdom", I'll be labeled as a "government shill" or "Debunker". If I say something against Debunker "wisdom", I'll be smeared as a "Truther".
The fear of really independent and critical thinkers is apparent, on both extreme sides. But more on the "Debunker" side, which acts more irrational and blindly authority obedient, which is my experience from the 12 years 9/11 research.
please include 3rd building and how shock propagation could have destroyed it
any update?
Are you still working on this super amazing simulations?
Absolutely.
@@KaiKostack awesome
my brother in christ, it hs been 8 months, where is the video
Coming soon?
Please finish the simulation if you can! :D
Where is it I'm still waiting 😢😢
This gonna drop harder than skate 4 and GTA 6 combined 😂
@@maxmccann5323 I bet he's prioritizing the paid projects.
I'm waiting too, unfortunately the simulations take time. 😬
@@KaiKostack i imagined it would take time to render the simulation, but can we get just spoiler of it?
Bro...it s been almost a whole year :(
How close are you to Completing this because it seemed really cool
I have just posted into the community tab, still working on optimizing model and software.
@@KaiKostack I just saw and the antenna looks very detailed
@@KaiKostack oh yeah will you show the entire event like both towers collapsing
@@Cartbs229 Not sure about the second tower yet because the collapse mechanism overall is quite similar, but maybe at a later time.
@@KaiKostack I still think you should do the entire event
Can you post it now
I always wondered what it would have been like being inside the towers as it collapsed.
Listen to the survivors of the towers its horrifying
Watch 60 Minutes 9/11 Archive: Under Ground Zero
Although it doesn’t show the inside of the towers it does show the rest of the complex after the attacks
Hello Mr Kostack, on what floors did the size/thickness/grade of the steel columns change in the twin towers? ...every 10 floors or something?
I think it was every 4 floors
And using 12 different grades of steel
You should do this with the south tower
We can expect a video in june?
I can't promise, but it won't take too long anymore.
@@KaiKostack how long now? We're all really looking forward to it!
@@maxmccann5323 The computers are working around the clock, yet it's still hard to make predictions.
Is this simulation still coming?
That's for sure.
It needs that time wich it needs to get done, such an hugh project has so many variables which need 100% attention to get the complete physical behavior as near as possible on real physical laws.
Also, if you can, why not do a sim of a pancaking collapse of a smaller building (eg: 30-40 storeys)? That would be easy and interesting.
I hate to keep bugging you (once a year) about this but how is the Twin Towers model going?
Things are moving forward, but there are many unknowns. I'm still testing how different triggers affect the collapse.
автор не пропадай, мы ждем!
Coming soon? 2 years later, or did I miss it?
Time is relative, but it will come. 🙂
@@KaiKostackany idea on a date? :(
give us a hint pls 🥹@@KaiKostack
No, time is the same in a relative way but we're older. Let's roll!@@KaiKostack
No, the sun is the same in a relative way.@@donaldhoot7741
Cant wait for the results, i heard a myth that you are rendering all this on a graphing calculator and thats why it has taken 2 eons
hola seguimos esperando los tutoriales de destrucción
Still waiting but I’m exicted 😂😂
Can you add an inside view in the final video?
It's very likely.
that little hole didn't bring down that big tall building.
Yeah but a 767 travelling at 400mph loaded with thousands of gallons of jet fuel causing fires over 1000 degrees fahrenheit which weakened the steel beams did
@@TheNegativeContrarian No, it isn't impossible. Nobody likes conspiracy theorists.
@@easton5700 the laws of physics were broken that day my friend
@@Brian-hf4ws They were not
@@TheNegativeContrarian not impossible at all... it has been proven
Hi is it possible for me to simulate a base isolated earthquake resistant building like the ones in Japan during a massive magnitude 9.0 earthquake in 2011 that shakes for 3-4 min, but only causes slight structural damage to it?
Sure, if you have the earthquake motion data. But you have to be careful with the numbers, the magnitude of 9 acted at the epicenter in the Pacific Ocean and not near a city. You would need the data close to the location of your building to get comparable results.
@@KaiKostack Thanks for your reply! I do think that how a building fare against earthquake shaking depends more on the mercalli intensity scale (MMI) from I (imperceptible) to XII (total destruction) than the earthquake magnitude, though the higher the magnitude the longer the shaking of that intensity (MMI) last, which may cause damage over time. In the case of the magnitude 9.0 2011 Tohoku earthquake in Japan with the epicenter just tens of kilometer east of Sendai, shaking the ground for up to 5 minutes with MMI around VII most earthquake resistant buildings survive with minor to no structural damage
We can expect this on the end of this month?
i think we are never going to see it. because i think when they started the simulation it wont fall :)
yeah i am sorry i think this whole thing is an inside job. they have to change some parameters to let it fall like it did in real life.
How is it going?
I'm in the phase of bringing everything together, towers and surrounding buildings. Since both towers are separate simulations but the debris of both are interacting with each other, combining the two is not that easy. But I'm close to a complete and successful run-through.
@@KaiKostack That's great. I'm very interested in how it turns out.
I wish the towers were still in nyc :(
It’s been a month released now
Could you do a animation of the b25 that hit the Empire State Building?
when did that happen?
@@attari56 1945
How is it going with the project?
Still some work to do.
Can you also simulate the brains of the conspiracy theorists, pretty please? Edit: I seriously want to understand how their brains work.
Pretty easy to simulate a empty shell, I guess.
@@recklesflam1ngo968 lol I couldn't agree more! 😅
@@தமிழோன் They have brains?
Why are there so many conspiracy theorists? Its with a reason right? They’re searching for the truth.. If you just look into the commission report from 9/11 and read that and then listen to the people like the firefighters that experienced that day, it will tell you different stories between the commission report and the people. Its so simple do to research isn’t it? You don’t have to be a sheep being sleep.
It's not that hard, here I can do it for you. Preconception followed by rationalisation leading into finding evidence that supports confirmation bias.
Where's the video? It's been over a year
Still working on it.
@@KaiKostack any update on how it's going?
@@maxmccann5323 I'm making progress on the surrounding buildings and underground structures, this is the last major piece missing. Shouldn't take too long anymore.
@@KaiKostack you should post behind the scenes stuff on like a side channel! It would be especially cool to see how all this stuff is processed!
Subscribed
is this still happening, or no?
Of course.
@@KaiKostack thanks for the reply. i'm looking forward to it
The World Trade Center was constructed with plane crashes in mind Boeing 707’s going at around 150 mph cruising speed, they were not built with Boeing 767-223ER’s in mind going at 400mph max speeds targeting pinpoint areas for collisions, and you don’t need fire to “melt steel beams” but when you have a constant fire burning near steel beams that reaches excessive heat those steel beams begin to weaken. After those steel beams weaken they no longer support the weight of the floors with the designated strength. As a result a collapse occurred. I may be right, I may be wrong but that is just my opinion.
I had no idea the entire area around the foot of the towers was constructed also! I always thought that was natural ground level. That complex really was vast!
It was. There is a parking garage down there.
So where is the simulation?
government chasing him down to change the results. he should have posted it immediately, istead of an announcement.
Is it coming out soon?
Hopefully.
@@KaiKostackare you going to add an camera in side to see how it moves/collapsed
@@KaiKostackhopefully…soon…as in 4 days or so
@@KaiKostack GL, would love to see the Pentagon impact modeled as well... beyond my skills
Why have you not posted?
Still simulating.
@@KaiKostack ok
@@KaiKostack How far has it gone?
Can you do the 2017 Manchester arena bombings
Its been a year did you cancel it? :(
Nope, still in the works. Shouldn't take too long anymore.
@@KaiKostack oh. Then it must be pretty detailed.
@@KaiKostackestimate to be ready?
So what were the steel and concrete distributions? How many tons of steel and tons of concrete were on each level?
How can accurate potential energy calculations be done without that data?
We have all the data: 1441.5 tons of concrete per floor was used, the total floor mass was 1826 tons. Besides the software can compute the masses from the material properties and the geometry all on its own.
@@KaiKostack
So provide a link to what you CLAIM.
Well, apparently you forgot to say the magic word. There are several numbers to be found on the internet and in the official reports - seek and you shall find.
@@KaiKostack Total floor mass is just 1826 tons? But....the tower weighs 500000 tons, so each floor had average 4000 tons
@@AbdullahAli-cf6mk By "floor" only the horizontal structures where you can walk on are meant, additionally the building had columns, perimeter walls, and a core.
Cant wait for the conspiracies when im first
Search ae911truth and you will soon see you've been hoodwinked
@@kripaharris237 ah theyve come
If you can’t see that it was obviously a demolition you should’ve been in the building that day
@@Mari-rq7wh Karma will Come to you.... Never wish the death of one
@@kripaharris237 they're a fraud
why is this on UA-cam....its 2021
please do the sinking of the Titanic!
A building its side 70% made of glass. No wonder why the plane penetrated the building.
No other highrise building has such high number and density of exterior and interior columns than the WTC twin towers had.
@@MrKoenig1985 the WTC collapsed not from the plane's impact crash, but from the fire burning inside the building thus softening the steel support beam. If the plane never entered the building and shattered upon impact, the towers would still be standing today.
Even the steel can't stop something that's as heavy as a passenger jet traveling at 70% of the speed of sound.
@@kimeg7294 it depends on how thick and how strong the steel is...those steel beams were meant to support the weight of the WTC structurally and I'm pretty sure they are lightweight and fairly thin. Those thin steel I-beams were never meant to take an impact from an airplane. Unless you fortified a building. I'm sure airplanes couldn't breach bunkers designed to withstand bomb blasts.
It has now been twi years wtf
I wonder how strong are those buildings and why an airplane can go through it??
Speed beats strength at the moment of impact, that’s my thought. But professional engineers are saying its impossible to crash into that building full of heavy steel without losing any plane parts. So I don’t know 🤷♀️
LMFAO Fly a commercial jet into any building and it will go through it lol I seriously can't believe you've just said that 🤦🏻♂️
@@Alloneword-cp2xw Cessna is definitely not able to break through the facade.
May those lost Rest In Peace
RIP To everyone who died in this sad incident #NeverForget ♥️♥️