When Studying Maths is UNSATISFYING... [ Math Joke Video ]

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 31 тра 2019
  • Help me create more free content! =)
    / mathable
    Merch :v - teespring.com/de/stores/papaf...
    shop.spreadshirt.de/papaflammy
    2nd Channel: / @rockhardwooddaddy
    today we are going to take a look at the unsatisfactory side of studying mathematics. ENjoy this skit :vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvv
    My Website: www.papaflammy.engineer/
    Flammy's subreddit: / flammybois
    Twitter: / flammablemaths
    Facebook: / flammablemaths
    Got some time to spare? Make sure to add captions to my videos! =) ua-cam.com/users/timedtext_cs_p...
    Want to know more about me? Watch my QnA! =D • Question and Answer Ti...

КОМЕНТАРІ • 371

  • @AndrewDotsonvideos
    @AndrewDotsonvideos 5 років тому +1130

    Now I have nothing.

    • @marinmaths3826
      @marinmaths3826 5 років тому +23

      Lmao, come on wreck him Dr. Dotson!

  • @willful759
    @willful759 5 років тому +378

    "a non trivial exercise"
    proofs like this are isomorphic to shitposts

    • @CalBruin
      @CalBruin 5 років тому +10

      @@PapaFlammy69 what was the textbook from which that non-trivial exercise line appeared?

  • @kamranrachlin2769
    @kamranrachlin2769 4 роки тому +534

    I spent a year studying in Japan (in English) and I swear to god one of the lecturers actually used Japanese letters at variables at one point the madman

    • @simeondermaats
      @simeondermaats 4 роки тому +81

      Was that like
      2な = 4
      な = 2

    • @ladasodaexplains3355
      @ladasodaexplains3355 3 роки тому +55

      I used Chinese characters for integration by parts, I bet my professor was still confused till this day what I wrote on the exam 😂

    • @Kazu-don
      @Kazu-don 3 роки тому +28

      @@ladasodaexplains3355 You just gave me ideas for my exams

    • @achannel9598
      @achannel9598 3 роки тому +7

      @@ladasodaexplains3355 lol which character did you write?

    • @pierfrancescopeperoni
      @pierfrancescopeperoni 2 роки тому +17

      @@simeondermaats な² = 7

  • @Davidamp
    @Davidamp 5 років тому +529

    "Yes, Andrew?" I'm dead

  • @non-inertialobserver946
    @non-inertialobserver946 5 років тому +606

    Integaral Bruh(威) d威

    • @mmtf
      @mmtf 5 років тому +78

      its even better because the kanji means intimidating

    • @non-inertialobserver946
      @non-inertialobserver946 5 років тому +8

      @@mmtf lol

    • @miloradowicz
      @miloradowicz 4 роки тому +12

      I love reading math books in Chinese. Explanations there are just much clearer.

    • @dangernoodle2868
      @dangernoodle2868 4 роки тому +9

      \int_{-\infty}^\infty bruh(ゴゴゴゴゴ) dゴゴゴゴゴ

    • @miloradowicz
      @miloradowicz 4 роки тому +20

      @@dangernoodle2868
      e^(iπ) = - 一
      f(x) = f(零) + x/(一!) + (x^二)/(二!) + (x^三)/(三!) + (x^四)/(四!) + (x^五)/(五!) + …

  • @parthpawar7837
    @parthpawar7837 5 років тому +707

    I was prepared was e=2.. heck even for pi=3... But God I wasn't prepared for e=pi

    • @rsg282
      @rsg282 5 років тому +55

      pi^2 = g

    • @IQuick143cz
      @IQuick143cz 5 років тому +124

      The complete version is: 4 = π = 3 = e = 2 = Φ = 1 = The points Andrew got

    • @dannygjk
      @dannygjk 5 років тому

      @@IQuick143cz wtf lol

    • @HDitzzDH
      @HDitzzDH 4 роки тому +11

      pi = sqrt(g)

    • @canriecrystol
      @canriecrystol 4 роки тому +19

      Weak, too weak. Ln(π)=1, fundamental theorem of engineering

  • @TheBlueboyRuhan
    @TheBlueboyRuhan 5 років тому +546

    You know it's good when you say euler twice but differently AND it's an Andrew Dotson parody

    • @hasiumcreeper5384
      @hasiumcreeper5384 5 років тому +25

      EULERn multiple ways to say mathematicians' names.

    • @EpicMathTime
      @EpicMathTime 5 років тому +3

      @@hasiumcreeper5384 Underrated comment

  • @MYCHEM1CALR0M4NCE
    @MYCHEM1CALR0M4NCE 5 років тому +176

    “No way you can use something you’ve used in another course” why is this so true

    • @dragonflyerstern156
      @dragonflyerstern156 4 роки тому +3

      We have luck ouf geometry prof allows us to use Ana 1/2 and LinA 1/2. The reason could be that she is the same prof

    • @jeangtech1830
      @jeangtech1830 4 роки тому

      Fr bro

  • @shellrox2878
    @shellrox2878 5 років тому +215

    "Fundamental Theorem of Engineering", lol!

    • @livedandletdie
      @livedandletdie 5 років тому +19

      It works though. e=2 pi=3 and e=pi and sinx=x and cosx=1 you just have to write a small enough x preferably 0

    • @shellrox2878
      @shellrox2878 5 років тому +2

      @@livedandletdie x = lim x -> 0 (x)

    • @erikkonstas
      @erikkonstas 5 років тому

      @@livedandletdie dx outside the denominator.

  • @ayeshas6580
    @ayeshas6580 5 років тому +158

    Derive "wheelers" formula haha

  • @ClaireYunFarronXIII
    @ClaireYunFarronXIII 4 роки тому +90

    “Mr. Dotson?”
    “Yes, Andrew.”
    I UNDERSTOOD THIS VERY WELL! 😂

  • @9Eriku
    @9Eriku 5 років тому +70

    "You're going to give a talk about Inter universal Teichmüller Theorem, you may have heard about it, it's pretty trivial". Bruh.

  • @thenukex1268
    @thenukex1268 4 роки тому +51

    The 1 page proof with 2 pages of references had me dead

  • @wejt5454
    @wejt5454 5 років тому +43

    Wheeler's formula and Yuler's identity
    cool

  • @peregee
    @peregee 5 років тому +114

    I'm defining my next function as bruh(e)

  • @SakraIgor0qNomoko
    @SakraIgor0qNomoko 4 роки тому +27

    45 of 48 points were docked because you proved the exercise using a general LCH space instead of exactly R. The remaining two were for spending too many lines on a clearly trivial matter.

  • @x0cx102
    @x0cx102 4 роки тому +33

    "Mandatory stats class that everyone has to take"
    AHAHAHAHAHAHA
    My brilliant math friend is suffering through this right now at college

  • @aflah7572
    @aflah7572 5 років тому +152

    When Netflix Adapts A Manga 😂

  • @OllysGaming777
    @OllysGaming777 5 років тому +102

    Bruh I rate this a e/π 🔥👌🔥👌🔥

  • @OlliWilkman
    @OlliWilkman 5 років тому +8

    I remember a proof from a textbook along the lines of, "With a bit of algebra, we see that the right side can be written as…" and then spending about three hours unsuccessfully trying to work out how it's done.

    • @dannygjk
      @dannygjk 5 років тому +3

      "bit of algebra" XD

  • @luck3949
    @luck3949 4 роки тому +12

    4:33 Oh! Now everything makes sense. That 3=2 discount advertisements were just using pretty advanced math.

  • @henrikrynauw244
    @henrikrynauw244 4 роки тому +16

    There is nothing worse than the good old "This part is left as an excersise for the reader." .

  • @jaspergodfreyzann5421
    @jaspergodfreyzann5421 5 років тому +83

    Integharal of bruh with respect to moment

  • @ilonachan
    @ilonachan 4 роки тому +9

    About the Kanji thing: aren't we actually running out of Greek letters by now? Aren't ~15,000 Japanese characters a good solution? I mean, you don't need to know what the characters mean to use them as variable names. And if you do know what they mean, you can actually have meaningful variable names _in math!_

  • @hoodedathlete6626
    @hoodedathlete6626 5 років тому

    This is so amazing. Love it. Keep up the good work!

  • @x0cx102
    @x0cx102 4 роки тому +4

    Discovered your channel recently and this is one of the funniest videos
    Your collabs with Mr Dotson are also very on point!

  • @gunhasirac
    @gunhasirac 4 роки тому +89

    “I’m trying this for 45 minutes straight going nowhere”
    That doesn’t sound long lol
    You can get lost with a problem with 5 hours.

    • @user-xz9zq3qy7y
      @user-xz9zq3qy7y 2 роки тому +2

      Hours? Well it may be days with algebra

    • @Isa-tn7ex
      @Isa-tn7ex 2 роки тому

      If it’s a meaty problem, regardless of type, it’s weeks or months- and in the best cases, years :D

  • @programaths
    @programaths 3 роки тому +3

    At university, got a teacher who wrote a "-" in a formula and get with it for the end of the lesson. So, I raised my hand and told him it should be a "+". He replied that I was not correct.
    When leaving the room, he crossed the "-" to make it a "+"...I was right and he didn't want to give me credits and wanted to mess with me.
    The thing is that it pissed me twice because I was thinking of others too. But the truth is that it was a detail that everyone would forget.
    School is not only about the material. It's also a place to learn that you have to deal with things that are unjust and unfair. Life is neither "just" and "fair", it's random.

  • @robertlauff8791
    @robertlauff8791 4 роки тому +3

    There is a package (xeCJK) that allows you to use Kanji, Hiragana, Katagana, Korean etc in Latex(XeTex to be precise) and it drives people correcting your homework crazy, espeacially if you use it in linear algebra ;D

  • @anthonynorman7545
    @anthonynorman7545 4 роки тому +7

    I died at "check for symmetry." Hits too close to home.

  • @completeandunabridged.4606
    @completeandunabridged.4606 5 років тому +64

    You-ler

  • @kwirny
    @kwirny 5 років тому

    I immediatly sent this my friends, you are so genius.Keep up the good work.

  • @calvinlee228
    @calvinlee228 4 роки тому +5

    As a math undergrad it hits me hard to see all my notes filled with theorem and lemmas while their proofs are left as an exercise...

  • @alse72
    @alse72 5 років тому +26

    Kanji math notation sounds sicc, do it!

  • @gagers78
    @gagers78 5 років тому +2

    Bruh this is pretty good. The one at the start was the best imo.

  • @bramlentjes
    @bramlentjes 5 років тому +1

    Hahahahahahaa super papa!!! The Teichmuller part was wonderful!

  • @pinec0ne
    @pinec0ne 4 роки тому +58

    4:32
    Actually, as an engineering student, I can confirm that the real fundamental theorem of engineering is
    Lim_[GPA->0] (Engineering) = Business
    (Stolen from Reddit)

  • @modestorosado1338
    @modestorosado1338 4 роки тому +2

    Damn those "the proof is left as an excercise to the reader" theorems. I often picture the author thinking "hmmmm, this proof is hard as nails. Oh, well I'll just leave it as an excercise just to fuck with the reader". And then proceed to laugh their ass off while they keep writing.

  • @wikiwikitoria
    @wikiwikitoria 5 років тому +28

    nailed the british accent boi

  • @mayankvats926
    @mayankvats926 5 років тому +21

    Andrew Dotson should definitely see t'is. Lmao

  • @SuperMiketron
    @SuperMiketron 5 років тому +29

    This video is like one big shitpost. I love it.

  • @legendhero-eu1lc
    @legendhero-eu1lc 4 роки тому

    Thank you for the video! All of you friends are super awesome! Oh, moments with this video are sad.

  • @neilgerace355
    @neilgerace355 5 років тому +43

    Good MORNING fellow mathematicians!
    I suspected something was up when I saw the glasses: Papa is trying to make himself look smart. A venture doomed to failure :p

  • @absolutelymath3399
    @absolutelymath3399 5 років тому +7

    Wow! This is great hahahahaha! Even loved the mandatory statistics haha

  • @dontsmackdafish3771
    @dontsmackdafish3771 4 роки тому +4

    Professor- "Compactness- ever open cover admits a finite sub cover"
    me- "what?"
    Professor-"Got that? Ok, moving on"

  • @donati880
    @donati880 5 років тому +11

    Mr.Dotson i've got a question! Lost it there hahahahahahahah

  • @wiener_process
    @wiener_process 3 роки тому

    I've literally had to learn how to write Schwabacher M in measure theory. It was the hardest part of that class, and that says something.

  • @ragerecords2476
    @ragerecords2476 4 роки тому +4

    "Youlers formula and wheelers identity" some time you just nail it in the very beginning.hats off sir, it was brilliant
    I like the guy who holds his shirt down btw, what is that supposed to mean ?

  • @luck3949
    @luck3949 4 роки тому +2

    That symmetric integral thing is so relatable :'D

  • @sergeitikhomirov9780
    @sergeitikhomirov9780 5 років тому +75

    No jokes about Frog Toadwalker, but ok

    • @nafissaatlagh206
      @nafissaatlagh206 5 років тому +4

      I rly dont understand whats ur problem with dat guy can u explain pls 😐😐😐😐

    • @UrasSomer
      @UrasSomer 5 років тому +6

      @@nafissaatlagh206 😐😐😐😐😐😐😐😐😐😐😐😐😐😐😐😐😐😐😐😐😐😐😐😐😐😐😐😐😐😐😐😐😐😐😐😐

    • @defunct1373
      @defunct1373 5 років тому +6

      @@nafissaatlagh206 r/woooosh

    • @sergeitikhomirov9780
      @sergeitikhomirov9780 5 років тому +27

      Sas Kia sure, but before i do...Can you figure it out? Give this problem a try

    • @nafissaatlagh206
      @nafissaatlagh206 5 років тому

      Hahaha cant u just answer directly lol I mean m not a big follower of his but I've seen papa flammy trollin him in his videos several times n I wanna understand pliis 😐😐😐😐😭😭

  • @josepha.cardenas9168
    @josepha.cardenas9168 4 роки тому +6

    "THe Proooof is trUVIal and left as a more trivial exercise".
    *Checks the book and reads 3 more.
    Holy 🐄...
    I am John Snow.

  • @eirikkvalheim8627
    @eirikkvalheim8627 4 роки тому +3

    This was absolutley spot on and hillarious! As a Math student there is too much relatable content here xD

  • @laughingwho7290
    @laughingwho7290 4 роки тому

    That one where he was asked to give a talk about IUT got me.

  • @lamureon
    @lamureon 4 роки тому

    haha love your videos. doing algebraic geometry atm which I will never ever need after graduation :D

  • @sriniwas764
    @sriniwas764 5 років тому

    Man I'm living for this shit now

  • @shadownik2327
    @shadownik2327 Рік тому +1

    My god I remember that symmetry on the integrand, they did give the explanation and hint but u refused to see it, I was so frustrated and at the same confident and i finally did end up looking at the hint though. I still can't believe I was that petty😅

  • @marcelkruger5187
    @marcelkruger5187 4 роки тому

    This video hits close to home

  • @ethanjensen661
    @ethanjensen661 5 років тому +1

    LOL!! That was amazing!

  • @sigmastripes
    @sigmastripes 5 років тому

    this is so true it genuinely hurts

  • @iiFiingkSoo
    @iiFiingkSoo 3 роки тому

    Just discovered your channel. Literally ROFL ❤️😂
    *Subscribed

  • @JeffreyMarshallMilne1
    @JeffreyMarshallMilne1 5 років тому

    Hey man great vid! V relatable loool
    I just bought the infinity boi hoodie and it's noice! I think making the limited edition version where u use the k ≥ 0 notation would be awesome. I'd buy that in a snap. I also wouldnt mind if you could make a thicker hoodie (I'm from Canada and it gets cold up here lol)
    Idk if maybe I just ordered the wrong model but the one I got is pretty thin. I still love it and Imma flex it 24/7

    • @JeffreyMarshallMilne1
      @JeffreyMarshallMilne1 5 років тому

      @@PapaFlammy69 I thought that might be the case but u can still count on me to cop the new design as soon as it drops (if). Having both the k ≥ 0 and infinity gril on the same hoodie would be mega exclusive and would be perfect for a limited edition!!! Thanks for always listening to what I have to say man

  • @DarthRaven9000
    @DarthRaven9000 5 років тому +1

    'It's very trivial, only one page.' Yeah. You're not fooling anyone, I'm not a child anymore, bruh.

  • @MKWKezer
    @MKWKezer 4 роки тому +1

    I‘m stuck at the Applied Math scene at the moment in my studies lol.

  • @jonaargueta771
    @jonaargueta771 4 роки тому +3

    2:43 you can use the symetry/antisymetry argument only if you now the parity of bruh(z(x))

  • @OtiumAbscondita
    @OtiumAbscondita 5 років тому +5

    The first time is always a but awkward...

  • @georgelsgomes9634
    @georgelsgomes9634 5 років тому +5

    I love linguistics... yeah!A veeeery old professor around here always spoke some shit in Latin in our classroom.. then I studied some Latin and later ancient Greek. I always... ALWAYS talk about this. I'll never forget about that fvcking lambda calculi book with Hebraic signs.. I felt "god dammit! wat I'm doing in my life!". we don't have enough symbols to "speak" mathematics lulz

  • @sortsome
    @sortsome 4 роки тому +2

    "I'm so glad you're finally doing something right in your life. That you are doing a math course... for once."

  • @domenicopiegaia7816
    @domenicopiegaia7816 5 років тому +1

    neat editing

  • @Israel2.3.2
    @Israel2.3.2 5 років тому +3

    "2 months later..." [spongebob voice]

  • @abioyenwankwo7308
    @abioyenwankwo7308 4 роки тому

    The symmetry part was relatable as an engineer but for all the wrong reasons.
    There was a homework that people had to demonstrate on the blackboard after handing it in. Nobody could get to the right answer on the blackboard and after enough time we were told the answer and how it was to be solved. We were expected to use symmetry to evaluate the integral. Except that it wasn't actually symmetrical and we were supposed to see that a clearly unsymmetrical portion of the function cancelled out "by simply looking at it". Not by looking at the function itself but just by looking at the graph of the function.
    To further add to the confusion this was a physicist saying this.

  • @davialefe7646
    @davialefe7646 5 років тому

    This is gold m8

  • @MrXenon-hn7ju
    @MrXenon-hn7ju 5 років тому +7

    1 out of 48 points! Why have I once again received 1 out of 48 points!?!?!?!?!?!?

  • @officialEricBG
    @officialEricBG 5 років тому +1

    I loved the IUT reference ahah

  • @49fa75
    @49fa75 5 років тому +1

    Lit asf papa.

  • @cmilkau
    @cmilkau 4 роки тому +6

    The biggest disappointment for me, and I guess not just for me, was to learn about foundations of mathematics. Eg. the set theory crisis and while there was considerable effort put into unraveling the story, most of mathematics just went on with ZFC (which is really just turning your wishes into a definition) and be done with it. Also Gödel's incompleteness theorems and how little (successful) investigation happened after that. It seems that foundations of mathematics are so hard that the brightest minds will find the inconsistencies, but noone can unravel the structures.

  • @emilyscloset2648
    @emilyscloset2648 5 років тому +1

    I lost it when u introduced the fundamental theorem of engineering around 4:30 ish

  • @thepositron5676
    @thepositron5676 4 роки тому +17

    "The Fundamental Theorem of Engineering" "Wheeler" "Youler" lmao XD

  • @grimztherapist
    @grimztherapist 5 років тому +2

    1 out of 48 points hits too close to home :(

  • @dannygjk
    @dannygjk 5 років тому +4

    I would hate to take non-trivial math courses. O.O

  • @SteveDice21
    @SteveDice21 3 роки тому

    3:13 It's even worse when you're supposed to know something that is taught in a course that's nowhere listed as a prerequisite for the course you're taking.

  • @Gameboygenius
    @Gameboygenius 5 років тому +4

    Should have been "Yes, Steven?" :p

  • @batatac4mil86
    @batatac4mil86 3 роки тому

    Why am I here I don't even know math even remotely close to this

  • @watsufizzi
    @watsufizzi 4 роки тому

    “No you have to prove everything from scratch”

  • @ericl8743
    @ericl8743 4 роки тому +4

    "It happens every damn week" 😂😂

  • @ladasodaexplains3355
    @ladasodaexplains3355 3 роки тому

    I’ve actually used Chinese characters doing nested integration by parts problems before

  • @KazACWizard
    @KazACWizard 2 роки тому

    4:01 i really felt that. i have to do mandatory statistics and it is the worst.

  • @gergodenes6360
    @gergodenes6360 5 років тому +1

    When (or if) I become a mathematician, and come up with a useful function, I will literally name it after a relevant meme, I really liked that bruh(...) function at 2:07

  • @JPK314
    @JPK314 5 років тому

    K_x is a subset of S: trivial
    The operation is associative: trivial
    The restriction of the operation to K_x gives a subset of K_x: two elements x^a and x^b for r≤a,b≤r+p-1 have x^a•x^b := x^(a+b). If a+b≤r+p-1 then r≤a+b≤r+p-1 so x^(a+b) is in the set. Else a+b≥r+p because a,b,r,p are all integers, so the proof proceeds as follows: r+p≤a+b≤r+r+p+p-2 so r≤a+b-p≤r+p-2≤r+p-1 but x^(a+b)=x^(a+b-p) by definition of p (specifically, a+b-p≥r as per our assumption in the else portion of this proof) so because x^(a+b-p) is in the set, the set is closed under the operation.
    K_x contains an identity element: trivial (by definition it is x^r)
    K_x contains an inverse element for every element in the set: trivial (for a given element x^a for r≤a≤r+p-1 its inverse is x^(r+p-a))

  • @laxminarayanbhandari855
    @laxminarayanbhandari855 2 роки тому +1

    Hey, I can do the first integral. Use the reflection formula of Gamma function. After that it's easy.

  • @CrittingOut
    @CrittingOut 4 роки тому +1

    4:32 fundamental theorm of engineering

  • @IkEisawesome7
    @IkEisawesome7 4 роки тому +2

    Ah yes, the classic Wheeler-Youler formula!

  • @jdd109
    @jdd109 4 роки тому +1

    That English (??) Accent was hilarious he sounds just as distressed and ill as me in my head in a test when I can't answer the first page

  • @kayleenmedina7889
    @kayleenmedina7889 4 роки тому +5

    4:15 Oh MY GOD.
    I felt that lol
    That statement was 100% true.
    I’m happy I chose applied mathematics. Ha

  • @someaccount3438
    @someaccount3438 4 роки тому +1

    Wheeler's formula

  • @jorgemedina7252
    @jorgemedina7252 5 років тому

    Such a good lore

  • @suspendedsuplexchannel1000
    @suspendedsuplexchannel1000 4 роки тому +4

    I wrote in exam "Euclid's idendity"😂😂

  • @Supremebubble
    @Supremebubble 5 років тому +1

    Interuniversal Teichmüller Theory. I see what you did there :D
    Yeah it's pretty trivial, I mean it's just one paper so how hard can it be?

  • @tomasblovsky5871
    @tomasblovsky5871 5 років тому +4

    Papa Flammy: "So students, here's the new exercise SHIIIIIT" ... students: "oh that was a good SHIIIT".

  • @tanvec
    @tanvec 5 років тому +4

    I always called Xi "the tornado" and I was hoping for a mathematical hadouken when I got into grad school