Це відео не доступне.
Перепрошуємо.
The Limits of LEGO and why a Even a DOWNSIZED UCS Turbo Tank is Far Away
Вставка
- Опубліковано 4 вер 2024
- UCS Turbo tank anyone? No, I don't think so... and it absolutely isn't because of prequel hate (though that's probably part of it).
The MOC in the thumbnail is made by Juggernaut Bricks.
#legostarwars #lego #starwars #revengeofthesith #ucs
Yes even a larger Juggernaut would be awesome.
1 cor 15 1-4 KJV. The «how» is That Christ shed His Blood for ALL our sins on the cross and washed them away. Faith in His Blood saves🙏🏻
@@swingerhd9022shut up nerd
1:50 Imagine if lego made the ucs venator as big as the one in the show💀
1 cor 15 1-4 KJV. The «how» is That Christ shed His Blood for ALL our sins on the cross and washed them away. Faith in His Blood saves🙏🏻
I hope you mean minifigure scale, not as big as the one in the show 🥴
@@swingerhd9022what do you define faith as, also are you free Grace
I mean, they also couldn’t and didn’t make the venator mini figure scale…so I don’t see why a downsized juggernaut would be an issue. It would still be much closer to mini figure scale than the UCS venator could ever wish to be
I more so mean that once you start getting into the territory of what would be the size of a UCS Juggernaut, current LEGO axle designs can’t handle the weight. They could totally do it downscaled, they’d just need new pieces.
@@crazydog1750 fair enough. The 2005 turbo tank has always been one of my favorite Lego sets ever just because of nostalgia and that I always wanted it as a kid, now I own 2
I feel like they have a good shot of making the UCS A5 juggernaut/turbo tank which is the one you see in the clone wars its smaller than the atat so i would guess 400-600ish dollars would be the cost
1 cor 15 1-4 KJV. The «how» is That Christ shed His Blood for ALL our sins on the cross and washed them away. Faith in His Blood saves🙏🏻
@@swingerhd9022 You are a terrible evangelist and an annoying person.
I think the biggest we could get a Juggernaut would be around $400 like the UCS Gunship. I think that would be a good size, but not perfect scale. I could likely afford that if I saved up for a long time.
1 cor 15 1-4 KJV. The «how» is That Christ shed His Blood for ALL our sins on the cross and washed them away. Faith in His Blood saves🙏🏻
@@swingerhd9022 I’m a Christian and I respect that you’re trying to spread the word, but I don’t think that a UA-cam comment section is the best way to do it.
@@OpticBlast-yk5hfNot sure how you could respect someone trying to shove their religion down everyone's throats. Oh wait, it's because you're religious too.
Anyway, I always make sure to report these religious spam comments. They're disgusting.
@@TheFirstCurse1 Ironically, by insulting his religion it seems like you're shoving your unreligious beliefs down HIS throat.
@@puneveryday158 They said that they "respect" that they're "trying to spread the word" so they support shoving their beliefs down people's throats and trying to force them into being religious like them. All I'm doing is giving them a taste of their own medicine.
0:22 Wait that venator was always just chilling in background in that scene?!
in lore it was critically damaged so they crash landed it on the surface of kaashyyk and used it kind of like a fortress/base of operations which the seperatists struggled to destroy because the guns and shields were still operational it was just immobilized on the surface
I think Lego should make a UCS AT-TE before moving onto a UCS Turbo Tank, since they already have the pieces from back when the UCS AT-AT was still in production.
Quite simply, you'd never get a minifig scale Juggernaut to begin with. Doesn't mean there couldn't be a ~4-6k piece one that uses Technic turntables.
Compromise, mini mini figure scale turbotank or venator (ends up just being the regular set lmao)
Quick question. What do the juggernauts do when they reach the ocean on Kashyk. They are driving towards it at full speed. Do they just stop and drive in reverse then forward towards the beach again?
Edit: just realized that someone else commented this too
🤣🤣 Cool looking things don't always make sense, I guess.
all the ones in battlefront are stationary behind friendly lines and just shoot their missiles occasionally, which seems like a good idea
idk, im willing to bet that the water was shallow enough that the juggernauts could just tread in the water towards the CIS base on the other side.
@@atrophine_ a good idea if your goal is to bankrupt the Republic and make it more vulnerable to a hostile takeover from some sort of ancient evil anti-Jedi
The oceans on kashyyk are really shallow in most areas iirc
* lego can't create sturdy enough Axel *
My brain suggesting me 1001 ideas on how to create a sturdy axel: 😐🙄😲🤪🤯🤕
🤣👌🏻
What’s funny about the massive scale you modeled (based on reference book measurements i’m sure) is that in that shot from rots in your video I can see clones next to wheels and it doesn’t look nearly that big. And in Clone Wars and Batch the turbo is def not bigger than an AT AT
I think those are wookies or AT-RTs. And the ones in Bad Batch are A5 Juggernauts, which are significantly smaller than the A6 in ROTS.
@@crazydog1750 that's the A9 Juggernaut the A5 never appears in canon
@@RedPandaReal Yo what? That's wild... all this time I thought it was the A5 I was watching.
honestly I see those technic turntables (in assistance with more technic support) to be more than enough to hold up the juggernaut? like I dont get it? ok like look at it like this: it isnt ONE of these wheels holding everything up on its own. its 10 wheels, spread out evenly to support a body that would mostly be a hollow shell held together by interweaving beams. like I really don't think it would even be heavy enough to collapse it?
Mechanical components like these turntables are not suited for a lot of fast rotation as would be in wheels. It would wear down fast. These are good for occasional turning. But I can imagine Lego could pull off some kind of bearing to support large vehicles. Or maybe something like 92908 part could be used here.
I've built a MOC of the Mobile Lab from The Lost World: Jurassic Park, and the weight would surprise you.
I've also built mock up "Firearms" out of Lego, too, and they are about as heavy as you would expect of real firearms of the same size.
Let me put it this way: The more pieces you have, the heavier the item is. The heavier the item is, the more stress is put on the axels/other support pieces, particularly if you're making a wheeled or tracked vehicle. The more stress on the axels and supports, the more likely they are to break or otherwise fail, sometimes resulting in something aerospace engineers refer to as "Rapid Unscheduled Disassembly".
Parts of any material have specific maximum tolerances they cannot safely exceed, and if those tolerances are exceeded, there is a high likelihood of the part breaking. There are no exceptions to this rule. Guns detonate if the chamber pressure is too high. Electronics short out if their power supply is being overloaded. I could go on, but I really don't feel like it. And I'm tired, so I can't think of any more examples at the moment, anyway.
My point is this: The turntable part you pointed out was designed with specific tolerances it can perform within. Taking something that would likely weigh multiple pounds/kilograms and placing the weight on even 10 of those things would likely break the pieces, or at the very least put so much stress on them that they wouldn't last too long. Plus they're not meant for prolonged constant turning, which is the whole point of wheels anyway.
Thanks for including artifex creations MOC as an example, I remember being obsessed with that video for like 10 years as a kid
I'm almost convinced LEGOs official design couldn't top it if they tried
All I can think about is that the axels of the juggernaut would absolutely get ruined by any terrain because they are both fully exposed in the front and also reach down to the bottom of the wheels, which completely negates the point of an all terrain style wheeled vehicle 4:26
I'm pretty sure Lego could figure out a way to do the axles, just abuse the holes in Lego Technic gears to link multiple axles together. Then use the big turntable as a bearing.
The bigger problem will be the combination of number of pieces and size. Sure things like the Eiffeltower and the Titanic are large, but they are large in 1 direction. The Titanic can easily be split into smaller pieces, as can the Eiffel tower. For the Turbo Tank that becomes more difficult, with having a roughly 50 inch long and I'd guess 20 inch wide size.
I guess the biggest problem will be matching pieces. The wheels alone would need to be new moulds as there are no 8-10 inch diameter Lego wheels. Moulds don't come cheap, so they would heavily increase the price of the kit. Assuming Lego would be willing to go through the lengths to create such a kit with all required new pieces added, then still I'm imagining a Lego set in the $2000 USD direction that not many would (be able to) buy.
If you look at some really big technic sets like the D11 bulldozer, 9800 excavator, 13000 crane, etc they are all pretty heavy and can hold their weight.
Heck the UCS ATAT is practiclly a technic set with a skin of system pieces on it. I do think a UCS juggernaught is possible but more on the midi scale. No bigger than the gunship.
Also if Lego simply used some strategic use of steel compatible technic axles and gears it might make all the difference.
A blue and grey lucrehulk is the coolest thing I think we could get, or an invisible hand.
lego knockoffs have carbon fibre axles, maybe lego should use them too
Honestly I'd be happy if they made a $160-200 playscale version at the same quality level as the recent AT-TE. I definitely wouldn't be able to buy a $5/6/7/800+ UCS one, but a playscale Juggernaut would be financially reasonable for me and probably most fans
Why is an entire axle necessary? Do it like how Speed Champion sets are; attach the wheels directly to a frame or at least some stronger, sturdier support structure. Highly doubt such a vehicle has axles anyway for the same reasons
'Tis a valid point, and probably what they would end up doing (though I think they'd still need to beef up the technic turntables a bit).
lego has been known to make sets that are just for display. the idea of lego is that you can rebuild and reshape your set with everything you have, but in the ucs atat there are some parts that can not be taken apart. thus it would make sense to target the adults who are the primary custemors of lego these days, and get one set out that cannont drive, but is for display only and looks cool. either way the idea is very good for another ucs set. (sorry for my bad english)
Yes they can be taken apart. Lego even released instructions for it.
Well, UCS sets generally aren't minifigure scale...anyway, I'm holding out for a minifig scale Death Star
A technic turntable would be more than sufficient to hold it up
I don’t know if the sizes we have now would be large enough, though. You can only fit something that’s two studs wide through them.
I feel like they still probably could do it smaller, and have it still be sturdy enough. The thing has what how many wheels? 10 total? That distributes the weight across at least 5 axles, meaning each individual axle is holding up a lot less weight than if it were just one. You could go overkill and do 10 different axles and have them not connect in the center and spread out even more. I think Lego hasn't designed one yet simply because they just haven't gotten to it, and have been working on other projects, as opposed to the idea they couldn't do it with current pieces.
*To sum all of that up: Having so many wheels would probably distribute the weight up enough for it not to matter, Lego just probably hasn't gotten around to designing one yet because of other sets they are designing.*
Imagine if LEGO made a ucs atrt Instead😂
It would be smaller than in the 501st battle pack
i would actually like one
Actually though UCS versions of smaller vehicles would be very nice.
I want a UCS MMT that carries a full 112 droids like in the movie 😎
On Rebrickable someone has made a really good minifigure-scale UCS juggernaut and it is 15,000 pieces
Isn’t that the motorized one?
Dude it is possible you literally stole Juggernaut Bricks work with Lego for the thumbnail and called something that has been done impossible
That’s a render, not a physical model. The physical model he’s built isn’t actually pure LEGO, either. It’s got motors and such in it so it doesn’t really count.
JB has made a functional design and take the motors and mechanized parts out, you still have a functional, load-bearing, entirely lego design. It holds up. Definitely room for improvement but to say it's impossible seems like you're really selling it short for no reason.
@crazydog1750 It definitely is 100% LEGO, even with the motors and it drives. 😂
Heres a really question what does the juggernaut do once its at the shore does it stay still or does it back up and make it’s way back down the beach
🤣🤣🤣
It could be amphibious, what with the water displacement on the wheels and hull
@@ThatTallBrendannah the Kashyk water is just extremely shallow, remember in fallen order, it only went up to the at ats ankles
@@slaya8065 Haven't played it, but it's worth a mention
Have we seen a T. tank in water before?
@@ThatTallBrendan no don’t think so, all we see pretty much is the at at up to like a little above it’s ankles
I just don’t think we’re ever getting a UCS turbo tank because the thing was on screen for probably a total of thirty seconds.
they can also make a UCS that isn't minifig scale
the ISD, venator, X-Wing, A-Wing, Y-Wing, B-Wing, TIE Fighter, Landspeeder UCS sets aren't minifig scale. They could totally just make a smaller one that isn't to scale with current building techniques (and a lot of technic involved)
I do go over that in video.
I remembered seeing another channel showcasing their own design of the juggernaut. That one is quite cool.
Ill be honest: i had no idea those Juggernauts in Ep3 were meant to be THAT big. They really did a poor job of representing their scale during that battle
Finally a like minded individual
Huhhhhh they aren’t just gonna use one axle, they’ll probable make a big one but also that’s so simple, they would just put actual rubber wheels underneath to work alongside the real ones connected by gears, also the big grey box between the wheels would very much help them attach the wheel with a bigger axle
i think if they made the wheels barely touch the ground and instead it was on a smooth underside maybe supported by clear pieces it could work
I've always hated the Juggernaut for one very specific reason. Look at the suspension. Notice anything wrong? Yeah, that's right. The lower part of the suspenaion does something unforgivable. Honestly don't know how it made it past qualoty control. The lower half of the suspension where it connects to the wheel literally go PAST the wheels and dig into the ground. Liike, I'm barely a mechanic, but even I know that if you suspension is what's touching the ground, and not the wheels, then not only will you vehicle have horrible ground clearance, but it also literally won't be able to move... at all.
🤣🤣🤣
3:10 Why wouldn't they? The ucs are for display, that's why they wanted the at at ucs to have as many poses as possible for display, the turbo tank does not need to move the wheels because it is for display, not for playing.
Fair point.
i don't see how the lack of pieces is that big of a problem, as you mentioned, the lack of pieces to make a sturdy build was also one of the problems in the UCS AT-AT, but even so they still made new pieces for it, and considering they make new pieces for themes much less popular than LSW, i wouldn't doubt that it's possible to make it happen, though i still doubt they will make it just because of how much smaller the audience would be compared to the AT-AT, considering that a lot of people that grew up with the precuels are still fairly young and don't have nearly as much disposable income as older fans/collectors
acclamator class, that's what i want for sure.
You can make a big axis by putting lego gear inside turret rotation mechanism, and then sliding multiple axis in this gear. Then lock turret rotation gear to chassis with technic parts.
I really hope they do a ucs drop ship to go along with the gunship
Why not make reinforced 4x4 axels made out of the y wing parts? Yk the yellow tubes and the grey circular connections, put the 6222there and have them rotate inside 4 5152 in the form of a hole, with 6228 pieces to complete the axle and inner connectors to make it sturdier or make some 60208 and 44292 cylinder covers
You've answered on your own question. Existing technic turntable could be nice solution. It even possible to motorized it and make suspension
I don’t know, I think that existing turntables aren’t large enough.
As Howard Stark once said, “I am limited by the technology of my time.”
In my opinion it's possible if Technic pieces are Used To make chassis . I haven't some old Technic sets That are similar To what we want . and for normal Lego pieces making body And then to just combine Both build together
Wheel don't need to move, just tires/tracks
1:51 woah, is it really that big? I knew playscale models were undersized quite a bit, but I never realised it was THAT large
Yeah, they’re pretty huge. Most people don’t realize just how large they really are.
Would be so huge and I'd love to get one if it existed
I don't even really care for the idea of a UCS Turbo Tank. I'd much rather have an ARC-170, AT-TE, or an AT-AP.
Not kid me tearing open a sealed juggernaut box to rip open the bag with the figures 💀
This is a well thought out video but I think you overlook a significant reason as to why the UCS AT-AT was released. The AFOL community is clearly being appealed to nowadays with these extremely large and expensive sets. Lego has recognised the profit potential of this market and apparently concluded that production of special set exclusive pieces to make these builds possible is well worth it.
There's the hope with this video: they see it, realize we want a UCS Juggernaut, and make the new pieces.
People also said it'd be impossible for Mega Bloks to make a Scarab that can hold it's own weight, yet they did
It's for sure possible, just not with current pieces.
i know this would suck, but what if they just make it hollow? like maybe add one or two control rooms but thats it, it would alleviate the weight significantly and then maybe they could actually make it
That would suck, lol. But it's an interesting idea, for sure.
Only a Sith deals in absolutes!
I can see it working with a mechanism like in the turntable of set 42055.
I've been hoping for a UCS MTT for some years. With the impending release of the redone or new battle droid transport I'm hoping the mtt is not too far off.
I don't think it would be that many pieces, you can argue that the venator is way bigger yet it is less pieces, they would just use bigger pieces so it would probably end up being less plus having wheels is a lot more stable they could just use technic pieces.
Who the hell said anything about minifig scale? Artifex made a huge completely RC one, nearly 15 years ago.
Very cool video, keep up the great work !
you could use the large technic turntable things as a rotation point for the wheels
Will literally be the first $5k set that can only be delivered by semi truck..
😂😂
I think the large technic racing tyre would be a good place to stsrt for reasonable scale & accurate detailing.
Solution: the HAVw A5 Juggernaut. It's like, half the size.
Quadruple the size can be less parts. You just use large pieces and leave sections of the internals empty. Steel axles or larger abs axles could work. The problem are displayability, who has space for that, and even more so, despite what you might say, the biggest issue is hate for the prequels. Sort the Lego Star Wars sets by piece count and almost all come from the original trilogy. Prequels are more niche.
If I ever become disgustingly rich, I promise to buy LEGO and make them make this set. No matter the cost. This *must* be done.
I'll hold you to that.
i desperately want a lucher hulk (probably butchered spelling) in any form midi or ucs it would be a day 1 buy
Minifigure scale for 1200$, I would buy ^^
Maybe a single axle wouldn't be enough, but technic does have wheel hubs to assist with that.
The juggernaut is kinda weird with scaling anyway, since throughout Star Wars media its size varies by a factor of 2. Just looking at the Battle of Felucia from the clone wars, it appears to be barely taller than an At-Te, and those are pretty well represented in scale through regular play sets.
That's because there are two versions in-universe: the A6 and the A5, which ironically, actually differ by almost exactly a factor of two. Impressive eyeballing skills.
A UCS juggernaut could be done as minifigure scale as it would still be massive.
why just not use round profile 2x2 bricks as axles ? and slide regular axels inside them , does not sound unfeasible
Just have the wheels be shells that rotate around a technic assemblyjust have the wheels be shells that rotate around a technic assembly
Ahh yes. More grey pieces to add to my collection.
upscaled pieces of that lego part allready exist
Honestly I’d want to see more MIDI scale starships
As shown in the battle of kashyyyk a clone is about (edit, actually they are about 1/3 of the height of the wheel but it)the size of a turbo tank wheel, so while it is giant I just do not believe it’s as big as you show it in your model
Im still waiting for a 1:1 mass effect reaper , it does take up a building lot like ithe one of the World Trade Cebter .
They could just make the clone wars juggernaut it's huge but significantly smaller and could definetly be minifig scale as a ucs set
I wanted the turbo tank soooo bad as a kid
Honestly i dont even care if its exactly minifig scale. It being in scale with the 2022 AT-TE is good enough and that wouldnt be so huge that would break the technic pieces since would likely make the super structure hollow to include play features and space to store mini figures. Probably the only real special pieces the lego would have to make would be creating large road wheels.
The 2022 AT-TE is minifigure scale.
@@crazydog1750 not really a mini fig scale AT TE is longer and bit wider. The Lego release can only hold 7 troopers whereas a mini fig scale one would be able to hold 20 troopers
@@nemisous83 You have to remember that a lot of that is due to LEGO building techniques and the fact that minifigures aren’t proportionally a one-to-one with humans. LEGO has extra structural things they need to build out that aren’t in the ships in-universe and minifigures are way thicker than people actually are-I’ve heard that proportionally, a LEGO figure is about the same as a 600 pound man. So yes, it cannot fit the same amount of troops, but that’s because it’s LEGO, not the scale.
i want a ucs tie stack
please give credit to juggernaut bricks who made the lego set on your thumbnail.
Credit now given in the description.
Love you buddy
Um... Guys, am I going insane here? Lego literally made an official set of this tank (7261). I had it. It was awesome.
A UCS version.
@@crazydog1750 oh, didn't know that was a thing
Super dope video!!!
The wheels could just move independently from each other
That would defo be amazing lyk
Aluminum Technic.
i would buy a clone turbo tank if its massive
Didn't LEGO already make one of these? Not in UCS form but as a general set. Edit: Yep. Set 75151. It's been retired for awhile now I think
Yeah, they've made three.
One of the Instagram accounts I follow has made a minifig scale motorised version with steering and play features so it is completely possible and to a much greater capacity than you thought
Yea, I’ve seen that… it’s motorized, not made of pure LEGO like an official set would be. The guy had to use stronger structural motor materials to get it to work.
@@crazydog1750but it is a great proof of concept, imagine what a few master builders could do if they were contracted to improve and replace the non Lego parts
30 seconds and im convinced
Begs the question, if they had massive rolling fast moving tanks like that, why would you transition to a smaller more vulnerable walking much slower thing.
You can thank the Tarkin Doctrine for that!
@@crazydog1750 uhm.. no. That's just a lazy excuse made up after the fact. The real problem is they fucked 1/2/3 up beyond belief and made lots of star wars things impractical in its own universe because they wrote a sloppy, shitty story for those 3 movies.
Wholeheartedly disagree. The dialogue and acting aren't very good, but the story itself is amazing.
And I personally like the idea of the Tarkin Doctrine. The Empire fell for a reason. Choosing big, scary things over economic, practical things is a great way to seem powerful for a little while and then come crashing down. I think it fits in very well and isn't a lazy excuse so much as a nice little detail they were able to add to the canon that fits kinda perfectly.
@@crazydog1750 people will make any excuse for this horrendous movies. How is the story amazing? Palpatine wanted to get senate to hold a vote of no confidence in episode 1 so he could become the new chancellor, but he directs the alien dudes to 1) kill the Jedi and destroy their ship (how will they report back about the crisis?) 2) establish a comm blackout on naboo (how will they reach the Senate about their crisis?) And finally 3) have the queen sign the treaty to make the invasion legal (thus negating the need for a vote of no confidence...?) The story was written by a dumb fuck 8 year old. The original movies say Anikan was supposed to be a good dude tragically seduced by the dark side and good friend of obi wan, right? But from the moment we see adult Anakin in episode 2 the only things he does are disrespect Obi, disobey him, and generally just be an angry, amgsty murderous psychopath. We never actually see him be a good dude at all anywhere in the movies. He's just a fucking bad guy from the start. The entire Jedi council is dumb as fuck too, they're like "this boy is a grave danger to us all... Go ahead and train him up anyway." None of it makes any fucking sense whatsoever.
In a very technologically advanced galaxy with incredible communication technology, Palpatine knew that news about the invasion of Naboo wouldn't be able to be contained. He wanted the Trade Federation to get into trouble, but of course, he wouldn't want the TF to know that. So he "helped" them get try to get an info blackout going and assured them that he could make the invasion legal so that they wouldn't get in trouble. He used them, you gotta understand that what Palpatine tells his minions isn't always gonna be the truth.
And, as a matter of fact, we do see Anakin doing good things throughout the movies (he volunteers his skills to help strangers get off Tatooine, he is unable to sit by and do nothing when several destroyer droids ambush his friends and jumps into action, he tries to save his mother, he marches into a droid factory in a desperate attempt to save Obi-Wan, he saves Obi-Wan from being left for dead on the Invisible Hand, he wants with all his heart to save Padmé), with his darker side sprinkled in (slowly getting more intense as it goes on). If Anakin was 100% good and absolutely zero bad from the start, how would it make sense for him to become Darth Vader? You gotta show him making bad choices-but just because someone makes bad choices doesn't mean that there are absolutely no good qualities to be found.
And, yes, the Jedi Council was idiotic, but that's kinda the point... they became so engrossed in dogma that they lost sight of emotional intelligence and said "Well, if he's the answer to this prophecy then maybe we gotta trust it." They were just so focused on rules and government and internal power structures they had almost become villains in and of themselves.
good video. whelp, back to crying in the shower.
I wish you good luck. I love crying in the shower.
Wow I’ve never seen it next to an atte
Yeah, they're pretty huge. It's shocking to realize the scale of a Juggernaut.
UCS MTT or UCS Naboo Diplomat ship
Why not have multiple axles running through the wheels?
if a ucs at at could get made this thing could
UCS in my eyes is for static display with minimal moving parts or some interactive parts. The whole move ability of the legs for the ATAT is to change poses which makes sense. Having the wheels not move on the turbo tank wouldn’t really be a big deal.
Also to note many of the UCS sets are not scaled correctly. Not by minifig or 3 stud scale but by their actual dimensions. The UCS LAAT is a prime example that the troop compartment is far larger than it should be when compared with the cockpit or vise versa.
In theory they could make a new, thicker axel and new technic bricks with massive holes for the axles?
Turning would be another challenge
Larger axles technically exist and you can even imitate the system with a 24t gear and a bunch of long pins. The system was used on outdoor RC cars from 2004-2006 (like 8369 and 8675). Zerobricks made a couple of Lego truck trail vehicles this way about 10 years ago, when these were the biggest, grippiest tires you could get from Lego.
They should make it a play scale so I can afford it and not sacrifice a meter of spce
🤣
My guy that Juggernaut on the thumbnail is literally being built by a guy AND it’s motorized. It’s just a matter that most people wouldn’t want to buy a UCS $1,000 Juggernaut especially when we had to fight as hard as we did for a UCS Venator.
That's the thing-it's motorized, not built from pure LEGO. The guy had to use non-LEGO elements (and even then it has some issues). Much different from what an official LEGO set would be.
@@crazydog1750 You can build large scale things with Lego. I've done it with no non-lego parts. This is just a pricing thing.
@@g.williams2047 Yeah, the point of the video is that it CAN be done, just not to the stability standards of an official LEGO set.