4.6L VS 5.4L-MISTAKES WERE MADE! HOW TO ADD A VORTECH SUPERCHARGER TO FORD 4.6L 2V & 5.4L 4V MOTOR!

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 15 лис 2022
  • WHICH ONE MAKES MORE POWER, 4.6L VS 5.4L? HOW MUCH POWER IS A VORTECH SUPERCHARGER WORTH? CAN I RUN BOOST ON MY 4.6L 2V MOTOR? CAN I SUPERCHARGED THE 5.4L 4V NAVIGATOR MOTOR? IS A 4-VALVE MOTOR BETTER THAN A 2-VALVE MOTOR? SHOULD I MODIFY THE MOTOR BEFORE ADDING BOOST? HOW MUCH ARE CAMS WORTH ON A SUPERCHARGED MOD MOTOR? CHECK OUT THIS VIDEO WHERE I RAN A FIRST MODIFIED A 4.6L 2V NON-PI MOTOR WITH PORTED PI HEADS, COMP CAMS AND PI INTAKE, THEN ADDED AN INTERCOOLED VORTECH SUPERCHARGER. ALSO INCLUDED AS A TEST WHERE I ADDED A VORTECH SUPERCHARGER TO A MODIFIED 5.4L 4V MOTOR, THEN TESTED WHAT HAPPENS WHEN YOU ADD ICE WATER TO THE INTERCOOLER.
  • Авто та транспорт

КОМЕНТАРІ • 104

  • @getawayperformance
    @getawayperformance Рік тому +5

    Thanks for all the help and all your work. I appreciate all your advice and support in the live feeds.

  • @rocsti5402
    @rocsti5402 Рік тому +2

    Great timing . I was in the mood to hear about 4.6 and 5.4 because parts availability and here you are one day ago nice

  • @sstevocamaro
    @sstevocamaro Рік тому +3

    LT would love this video. He’s putting together a similar 5.4 now..

  • @chandlerlofton6536
    @chandlerlofton6536 Рік тому +2

    I’ve always wanted to build one of the early cobra 4.6 engines. I haven’t showed the mod motor much love.

  • @andyharman3022
    @andyharman3022 Рік тому +3

    Turbos Rule! I guarantee that your turbo belt will never slip.

  • @longdongjohnson1
    @longdongjohnson1 Рік тому +5

    Please play around with the 3v 5.4.

  • @lifeonadime4703
    @lifeonadime4703 Рік тому +2

    I love mod motors. As long as the timing chain/guides are in good shape and some moron hasn't been changing the plugs, they just run forever. Yeah they may not be the most powerful thing on the road. But they are sweet boosted and sound awesome 👍

  • @lucasmullins5100
    @lucasmullins5100 Рік тому +9

    My take away is that everything needs boost!

    • @drgibs347
      @drgibs347 Рік тому +3

      You sir are %100 Correct! Boost Everything! Thats my motto.

  • @Deadvous
    @Deadvous Рік тому +3

    Hey Richard, something I’d like to see if you could do it is 4v 4.6 NA engine builds, testing different camshafts and intakes and possibly different fuel types like E85

  • @jplperformance9073
    @jplperformance9073 Рік тому +1

    Cool testing 😎

  • @octaviomendoza5256
    @octaviomendoza5256 Рік тому +1

    Also if you can swap out 5.42v heads for 4v

  • @jameshowlett8811
    @jameshowlett8811 Рік тому +1

    How much hp can the gen1 mod motor handle ??

  • @drgibs347
    @drgibs347 Рік тому +4

    Boost The World! Everything needs Boost :-D

  • @blaggironheart9919
    @blaggironheart9919 Рік тому +1

    good video. but what's that rifle in the background?

  • @matthewruss5008
    @matthewruss5008 Рік тому +1

    Nice!

  • @octaviomendoza5256
    @octaviomendoza5256 Рік тому +1

    Hey Richard I have a 5.4 2v and was wondering if you did any testing on those as I only see 4.6 2v of 5.4 4v

  • @Selkirk69
    @Selkirk69 Рік тому +3

    850 plus hp from 330 inches wow!

  • @philippperez5739
    @philippperez5739 8 місяців тому +1

    Can you do a 3v

  • @madmod
    @madmod Рік тому +4

    Did someone say Mod Motor?!

  • @jamesgeorge4874
    @jamesgeorge4874 Рік тому +5

    The whole Triton family emphasis was on torque production, the 5.4 was rated at 330 ft/lbs at less than 2000 rpm, in 2002.

    • @HioSSilver1999
      @HioSSilver1999 Рік тому +2

      Over rated af to. Those things were gutless wonders.

    • @jamesgeorge4874
      @jamesgeorge4874 Рік тому +3

      @@HioSSilver1999 No, they made great torque at idle. And no horsepower. Just like Ford claimed. GM trucks made more horsepower, got better fuel mileage, and are much easier to work on, but the 4L60 sucks compared to the 4R70, and the fuel pumps lasted 3 times longer then GM trucks of the era.

    • @boost1728
      @boost1728 Рік тому +1

      They’re junk. Drive a 2004 Navigator 5.4 then drive a 2004 Tahoe 5.3… not even comparable. Mod motors are 💩

    • @jamesgeorge4874
      @jamesgeorge4874 Рік тому +3

      @@boost1728 there are almost no surviving examples where I am, but all I do for a living is fix vehicles, so you couldn't tell something I don't already know....

    • @boost1728
      @boost1728 Рік тому +2

      @@jamesgeorge4874 obviously there are a couple things you don’t know- like the fact that first gen mod motors are gutless. Can barely tow a jet ski behind a 4.6 F150. Waste of time and money

  • @frederickhairston3823
    @frederickhairston3823 Рік тому +1

    Good evening building non roller 351w want to make it roller. What length push rods with link bar roller lifters.

  • @theshed8802
    @theshed8802 Рік тому +3

    I thought that the 5.4 NA power curve looks like teeth off a wood saw. Any idea as to why it was doing that Richard?

    • @myronwebster
      @myronwebster Рік тому

      I would say belt slip

    • @theshed8802
      @theshed8802 Рік тому +1

      @@myronwebster unlikely as it's not running the blower at that point in time.

  • @oldcarnocar
    @oldcarnocar Рік тому +1

    npi was 1991-2/2000 in panthers

  • @arireid1245
    @arireid1245 Рік тому +8

    I know this video is talking about boosting the 4.6 and 5.4.But when it comes to reliability i pick that 4.6 all day everyday!

    • @andrewmontgomery1763
      @andrewmontgomery1763 Рік тому +6

      They're practically the same lol

    • @joshkrause2977
      @joshkrause2977 Рік тому +3

      What? The 4.6 3v is just as shitty as the 5.4. The 2v motors where also exactly the same for reliability. Same with the 4 valve motors…..

    • @oldcarnocar
      @oldcarnocar Рік тому +1

      +1

  • @andrewchristmas2026
    @andrewchristmas2026 Рік тому +2

    There's gotta be power power potential in that 5.4 N/A

    • @P71ScrewHead
      @P71ScrewHead 8 місяців тому +1

      There is.. Kaase builds 5.4s n they make huge n/a power with then, last i checked..

  • @gollumthewicked
    @gollumthewicked Рік тому +3

    Richard, was this 4.6 a stock bottom end? Internet myth claims those motors don't like going beyond 500whp before eating pistons and rods. I personally think it's ring gap and tuning that are at the core of that problem but always love to see these examples that push the envelope a bit like your big bang experiments.

    • @wyattyeary8050
      @wyattyeary8050 Рік тому +2

      these are numbers at the flywheel. add drivetrain loss etc. a 500 whp 4.6 is likely making 20% more than that at the flywheel. I don't see a few pulls on the dyno causing it to spit its guts out.

    • @gollumthewicked
      @gollumthewicked Рік тому +2

      @@wyattyeary8050 I'm fully aware. I'm also aware of a few blown 4.6s at 430-450whp and a few choice examples claiming 550whp. The real "limit" is illusive but Richards numbers are knocking on the upper end of what people consider the "practical limit".
      Personally I think it's about 650-700 crank lb-ft of torque that's the limit, which with factory heads might end up being 500-ish whp. Improve the breathing and you can reach a bit higher in RPM and get better peak numbers.

    • @banneddamn
      @banneddamn Рік тому +2

      Rods are the real weak point. Might make some power (500+) for a little bit, like a few dyno pulls, some pulls on the streets etc. But it's on borrowed time. The there is no getting around it. No amount of tuning will make a rod any stronger. In the real world they won't last long. They will bend/break and it's been proven many times.

    • @wyattyeary8050
      @wyattyeary8050 Рік тому +3

      I drive a 4.6 2v with a vortech, I can tell you 450 isn’t blowing it up. Been bashing on it for almost a year this way.

    • @gollumthewicked
      @gollumthewicked Рік тому +2

      @@banneddamn rods don't reach their mechanical limit at a HP level though, but torque. The question is, when people bend rods at greater than 500whp, what torque were they producing? I'd also be curious how many bent rods were on manuals vs autos, as it could also be torque vs applied resistance (load). Autos are "softer" on engines, generally.

  • @Cmonstercookie
    @Cmonstercookie Рік тому +1

    Can you put 4v heads on a none pi 2v block?

  • @luciankristov6436
    @luciankristov6436 Рік тому +1

    NA 5.4 4v with navi heads ported didn't make more power with a sluivan intake??? Wtf

  • @SkateAndReview
    @SkateAndReview Рік тому +1

    Would these mods apply to the triton 4.6 2v as well?

    • @richardholdener1727
      @richardholdener1727  Рік тому

      yes

    • @mickblack3291
      @mickblack3291 Рік тому +1

      ​@@richardholdener1727 In Australia we have a Ford V8 that uses a Windsor 331ci bottom end with Cobra R 4v Heads that in its day made 349hp with 500nm of torque or 260kw in new speak, can any mods be done to the Cobra R heads & cams? It's a bulletproof engine.

    • @P71ScrewHead
      @P71ScrewHead 8 місяців тому

      @@mickblack3291 Bigger cams yes, ask around over there..

  • @scrubnick
    @scrubnick Рік тому +1

    So the built 2v 4.6 was only down 40hp from the built 4v 5.4? Odd.

    • @sstevocamaro
      @sstevocamaro Рік тому

      A 40hp difference is about 4 tenths in the 1/4 mile. Example 11.80’s vs 11.40’s..

  • @AndyFromm
    @AndyFromm Рік тому +2

    Test an Atkinson cycle engine

    • @jamesgeorge4874
      @jamesgeorge4874 Рік тому

      You already know about them, nobody here is wondering how boring an engine that gives up low speed power, for efficiency, would do on the dyno, plus, the are inherently small, usually coupled to a motor/generator, and not a platform that is plausible for power gains, because their intent, from conception, is the opposite. The Miller cycle engine is as close as you are going to get.

  • @Jackstands
    @Jackstands Рік тому +1

    Is this with a stock bottom end on that 4.6l

  • @neilziesmer6109
    @neilziesmer6109 Рік тому +1

    2000 FI50 5.4 STOCK COMPUTER SMALL TURBO FMU FUEL ENRICHMENT NO CHK ENGINE LIGHTS MUST PASS SMOG ?

    • @thastinger345
      @thastinger345 9 місяців тому

      10th gen body style is the same as the Lightnings were, so just get the Lightning intake manifold/intercooler setup and supercharge it. My 98 F150 4x4 is done this way and I run a Whipple 2.9SC on it now. I ran the ported Eaton SC for 12 years before I went to the Whipple.

  • @JC-gw3yo
    @JC-gw3yo Рік тому +1

    The 4 valve engines make monster power.. That is why the crotch rocket engines use them

  • @staylebutler9135
    @staylebutler9135 Рік тому +6

    I make sure to make plenty of mistakes on my engine builds so I can learn to make less mistakes...

  • @9psi
    @9psi Рік тому +3

    3V 5.4 please

    • @SkateAndReview
      @SkateAndReview Рік тому

      Worst engine ever made? No thanks

    • @9psi
      @9psi Рік тому

      Hence why it would be interesting

  • @johnpye7177
    @johnpye7177 Рік тому +1

    Are you sure?

  • @thetruthspeaker1978
    @thetruthspeaker1978 Рік тому +3

    First comment yeah lol

  • @jplperformance9073
    @jplperformance9073 Рік тому +1

    Watch out for the scammers people. There are NO prizes and if someone asks you to pay for shipping it is NOT Mr Holdner, trust me.

    • @richardholdener1727
      @richardholdener1727  Рік тому

      Thnx JPL-I don't have any prizes nor would I ask for shipping costs!

  • @unclesquirrel6951
    @unclesquirrel6951 Рік тому +16

    Personally I blame squirrels

    • @sstevocamaro
      @sstevocamaro Рік тому +3

      I hate squirrels.. They’re always digging up my yard.

    • @staylebutler9135
      @staylebutler9135 Рік тому +1

      @@sstevocamaro damn bastards plant nuts in my gf, and I can't... something about those furry things women Love.

    • @unclesquirrel6951
      @unclesquirrel6951 Рік тому

      @@sstevocamaro furry jerks :(

    • @timkox2976
      @timkox2976 Рік тому +2

      I love squirrels...grilled.

    • @staylebutler9135
      @staylebutler9135 Рік тому

      @@timkox2976 never had squirrel, would like to eat some sometime

  • @scottsigmon926
    @scottsigmon926 Рік тому +2

    I can’t believe that the 5.4 makes basically the same power as the 4.6 in naturally aspirated trim!!! That’s not good.

    • @richardholdener1727
      @richardholdener1727  Рік тому

      it made nearly 40 more hp

    • @scottsigmon926
      @scottsigmon926 Рік тому +1

      @@richardholdener1727 but it has 50 more cubic inches and 4 cams!!! It should have made at least 60 more

    • @robertkington2084
      @robertkington2084 Рік тому +1

      @@scottsigmon926 are you under the impression that more cams add hp?

    • @scottsigmon926
      @scottsigmon926 Рік тому

      @@robertkington2084 they definitely make the engine more efficient and in many cases, yes, it should make more power. The cubic inches alone should have made more than 40 hp

    • @robertkington2084
      @robertkington2084 Рік тому

      @@scottsigmon926 number of camshafts dont change VE. If it had 32 individual camshafts the engine would not care. It all boils down to what heads were used during the test. If they used non pi 2v 4.6 heads then compared them to a 5.4 with the Ford gt heads then you would see well over 100 hp gain.

  • @michaelangelo8001
    @michaelangelo8001 Рік тому +2

    Fordies...

  • @unclesquirrel6951
    @unclesquirrel6951 Рік тому +2

    230 k 🐿🐿🐿🐿🐿🐿🐿🐿🐿🐿🐿🐿🐿🐿🐿🐿🐿🐿✅

  • @HioSSilver1999
    @HioSSilver1999 Рік тому +2

    Everything likes boost the same. It's just more noticeable on those things because they're gigantic turds.