Watch Expert Reacts to a LUXURY Patek Philippe Watch | Watchfinder & Co.

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 17 жов 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 520

  • @watchfinder
    @watchfinder  Рік тому

    We know you want more watches…. click here: linktr.ee/watchfinder

  • @ramimsd
    @ramimsd 4 роки тому +92

    Loved your very last sentence .... "Using it just to read the time, without appreciating everything else about it, is a bit like using the Mona Lisa to cover a stain on the wall."
    Well said 😊

    • @flogro4862
      @flogro4862 4 роки тому +4

      Very true, that's an excellent punch line I also picked up. These guys are even better writers than watchmakers and when we see how much knowledge is displayed on watchmaking, this is rather quite a talent.

  • @AndreasTunney
    @AndreasTunney 4 роки тому +638

    Believe me you don’t need to use such titles for these videos. These kinds of catchy and trendy titles other UA-camrs use to play with the algorithm drive me crazy. I don’t want these titles to change as well! It’s extremely undeserving for a channel of this high quality; just let natural viewers come. Great video either way.

    • @SZ-ZS-
      @SZ-ZS- 4 роки тому +21

      he 100% doesnt need these titles for his current subs, but non watch people will be drawn to this title like flies to shit, but non watch people wont like most of his videos... so its a bit confusing

    • @xx4rch4xx
      @xx4rch4xx 4 роки тому +27

      It’s a pisstake I’m sure of it

    • @AndreasTunney
      @AndreasTunney 4 роки тому +9

      A. B. You have a point that it could possibly expand the hobby or attract more enthusiasts, but I don’t believe a bothersome and trendy title change is the best way to do it in regard to nearly all accounts. It’s also so cheap to boil down this video or any other great video he’s made to, “Watch expert reacts to...” just like some of those irritating UA-camrs. I believe I also saw this point on another comment, but these kinds of titles don’t seem to fit the sophisticated level of the content. It feels very out of place.

    • @chriscross9505
      @chriscross9505 4 роки тому +4

      @@AndreasTunney I have a great idea. Start your own channel and title it exactly how you want. Then you can sit back and read people's critiques of your hard work in the comments. It'll be fun. Enjoy! x

    • @mao7
      @mao7 4 роки тому +9

      I believe it's a joke

  • @ArchiveFlipper
    @ArchiveFlipper 4 роки тому +290

    Hmmmm, the title is something...interesting, but I have to agree with the rest of the viewers, it's out of place for such quality, masterful content.

    • @edd2771
      @edd2771 4 роки тому +13

      The title is a joke...the man is winking at, and having a laugh with, his audience. (Or so he thought....he’s probably now realizing how humorless this crowd is)

    • @ArchiveFlipper
      @ArchiveFlipper 4 роки тому +1

      @@edd2771 well I do think it was an attempt to get younger people into the hobby, and I can see where they got their ideas from, because I'm 16, and I'm used to get asked "why do you where a watch? They're so pointless!" A shame really, so I don't think it's as bad as some others make it out to be!

    • @NiquelBones
      @NiquelBones 4 роки тому +1

      @@ArchiveFlipper i too ask myself why ppl where watches

  • @LukeBurrow
    @LukeBurrow 4 роки тому +28

    This channel, together with xkcd, is one of only two sources on the entire internet that absolutely baffle me by their ability to make consistently excellent content in an unbroken and unrelenting stream for weeks, months, and years without even a shred of variance. I don't understand how you haven't run out of award-worthy content at this point, but thank you to everyone involved, and keep up the absolutely fantastic work!

  • @PierreKerbage
    @PierreKerbage 4 роки тому +17

    What a superlative piece of art! Took my breath away. Gorgeous video. Thank you for making it.

  • @popcorny11
    @popcorny11 4 роки тому +812

    Please don’t start having these uncultured video titles.. its very undeserving of this channel.

    • @Zyxio
      @Zyxio 4 роки тому +31

      I too dislike these kind of titles..

    • @SuperMastermindx
      @SuperMastermindx 4 роки тому +17

      its to expand the audience to help the channel be sucessful

    • @edd2771
      @edd2771 4 роки тому +26

      Humorless horology buffs of the world relax! IT. IS. A. JOKE.

    • @maskito4256
      @maskito4256 4 роки тому +5

      Lady, you should stfu, it’s non of your business how he titles his own videos.

    • @SinnMaster
      @SinnMaster 4 роки тому +10

      I say old chap, these boorish titles are a bit... shall we say, low class. Uncultured, indeed.

  • @jamesc6028
    @jamesc6028 4 роки тому +376

    even watchfinder is getting in on the meta titles, thumbnails next!

    • @muhammadaryawicaksono4232
      @muhammadaryawicaksono4232 4 роки тому +48

      [GONE WRONG] [SEXUAL] [18++]

    • @Moonlightkiller003
      @Moonlightkiller003 4 роки тому +76

      To be honest. I don't think those titles fit such sophisticated content.
      It just feels out of place...

    • @ArchiveFlipper
      @ArchiveFlipper 4 роки тому +11

      Well I hope it's a one off, there's already some backlash in the comments, but in my opinion it doesn't bother me "Too much"

    • @proper_gander3608
      @proper_gander3608 4 роки тому

      Is it waterproof?

    • @1D0N
      @1D0N 4 роки тому +2

      Moon true, but all that counts on yt is views.

  • @WorldsWorstFishing
    @WorldsWorstFishing 4 роки тому +2

    Love that PP offers this on a bracelet..sort of takes on a sporty look despite being the monster of complications that it is. 5270 is a masterpiece.

  • @edwardsauve4836
    @edwardsauve4836 4 роки тому +2

    This is pure art , no one needs a mechanical watch anymore but to look at the movement in a watch like this is its own reward , it's fine art that happens to be a watch .

  • @massivewillie
    @massivewillie 4 роки тому +66

    Not quite the Casio F-91W review I asked for, is it?!

  • @ad74ya76
    @ad74ya76 4 роки тому +26

    Even though the title is tacky, the quality of the video has surpasses their own standard. Kudos

  • @chrismuz
    @chrismuz 4 роки тому +69

    Guys, stop commenting about title allegedly being clickbait. It is a JOKE! - - - Cheers, from (unfunny) Germany

  • @dennisc.1189
    @dennisc.1189 4 роки тому +1

    I have been watching this channel for a few years now, and I just love seeing all these watches that I could never afford to buy. Keep up the good work on sharing these watches for us that can not afford them, so we can enjoy them too.

  • @Andre-hi9xn
    @Andre-hi9xn 4 роки тому +58

    "Watch Expert Reacts To Incredible $200,000 Patek Philippe Watch | Watchfinder & Co."
    English humor in its prestine wisdom.

  • @spectacularinsanity5215
    @spectacularinsanity5215 4 роки тому +1

    Absolutely stunning. That watch is stunning. That movment is beautiful and absolutely mindblowing to me. So many different types of of movements and the calendar is staggering.

  • @FoxThePainkiller
    @FoxThePainkiller 4 роки тому +3

    This is a piece of art. If I might own such a piece I would spend my time watching the perfection of each part.

  • @Ricky.913
    @Ricky.913 4 роки тому +1

    I get off of work, arrive home and wow, a notification from Watchfinder and Co. SWEET!!!! Thank you for another fine video about a true work of art.

  • @daveg1221
    @daveg1221 4 роки тому

    i never grew tired of listening to your voice over, its truly unadulterated joy so earorgasmic in nature

  • @WhatIsItReallyAbout
    @WhatIsItReallyAbout 4 роки тому +12

    Would be interesting to put one on a timegrapher and publish the result. But no-one seems to do it

  • @garyggarner7738
    @garyggarner7738 4 роки тому +1

    Beautiful and Very Awesome Timepiece!! Thank You For Your Thorough and Awesome Presentation!

  • @lilietto1
    @lilietto1 4 роки тому +83

    I think the title was a joke from his part, don't take it too seriously.

    • @zafran20
      @zafran20 4 роки тому +1

      What is the problem with the title? I honest dont know.

    • @lilietto1
      @lilietto1 4 роки тому +7

      @@zafran20 It is the classical clickbait title, you know with the keywords "reacts" "incredible", the price, etc. which you find everywhere on youtube.

    • @zafran20
      @zafran20 4 роки тому +1

      @@lilietto1 thank you.

    • @bostjancigale597
      @bostjancigale597 4 роки тому

      Luca Barone but this watch is realy incredible.

  • @jiheemvohor9720
    @jiheemvohor9720 2 роки тому

    I love that the day date apertures are consistent with the rest of the dial, meaning they're black with contrasting white numbers/letters

  • @ajaysasikumar6931
    @ajaysasikumar6931 4 роки тому +10

    I wanna watch this video on a 75mm IMAX format.

  • @doctortimepmd3339
    @doctortimepmd3339 4 роки тому +2

    Such a masterpiece i was wondering how many people will say in a hundred years would actually lay eyes on this masterpiece or any masterpiece ..i will say not very many..

  • @mrplummer1988
    @mrplummer1988 4 роки тому

    I like the analogy of the watch being like a painting not just a tool to tell time

  • @centrallyintelligentagency
    @centrallyintelligentagency 4 роки тому +6

    This is interesting-I am very appreciative of this particular Patek, and the macro hasn’t revealed any flaws-impressive.

    • @perandersaasheim5209
      @perandersaasheim5209 4 роки тому +4

      1:40 ish, between Patek Philippe and Geneve. Im sorry, i was sad too!

    • @centrallyintelligentagency
      @centrallyintelligentagency 4 роки тому

      @@perandersaasheim5209 Ah man. I thought we'd get away scot free this time with a finally perfect Patek. Shucks. Thanks for pointing this out.

    • @thecommenter578
      @thecommenter578 4 роки тому +1

      4:07 there's a black speck on the scape wheel

  • @sushimshah2896
    @sushimshah2896 4 роки тому

    I think you've already done a video on the 5270R iirc, but no problem watching it all over again😍😍

  • @garyggarner7738
    @garyggarner7738 3 роки тому

    Beautiful Time Piece!! Excellent Attention to Details!! The engineering involved with the complications - I’m in awe of of the build quality and how the Watchmakers assemble and build such a Gorgeous Accurate Mechanical Time Piece. Plus, each Time Piece is Perfect!! .

  • @valuedhumanoid6574
    @valuedhumanoid6574 2 роки тому

    I am a wrench monkey. I turn wrenches and repair broken machines in my factory. I was under a car with my dad when I was 6. My mom was furious when I would come into the house covered in grease, oil, dirt, bleeding from half a dozen scratches and a grin. The more complicated the machine the better. So naturally watches of this caliber are the pinnacle of my love. Changing the starter on a Caterpillar bulldozer is one thing. Assembling parts you have to have a 12x loupe just to even see is on a whole other level. Like a high school football player in the Super Bowl. Just the best of the best. Liked and subbed.

  • @danielcharrie7125
    @danielcharrie7125 3 роки тому +1

    I Iove watches,l don't know why, but I do! I own 2 watches, one cost me 9 dollars, it's digital and solar powered, the other one was 60 dollars, it's a casio electric but with hands, which is nicer than digital.l don't have much money, but I am so happy with them, ty for your comments on the Patek- Philip. It's a work of art,a real chef-d'œuvre,merci!

  • @nordinsemlal1502
    @nordinsemlal1502 4 роки тому +1

    Nice video as usual. Would you mind presenting the 5235G from Patek ounce? Such an understated watch

  • @nikhilc8681
    @nikhilc8681 3 роки тому

    Probably the best video of Watchfinder I've seen 🙏

  • @13Hangfire
    @13Hangfire 4 роки тому +1

    Great video and an amazing watch... thanks for bringing us both!

  • @SunoSunoDuniyaKeLogo
    @SunoSunoDuniyaKeLogo 3 роки тому

    How is it different than 5270G 001? Other than the external materials used.

  • @maskito4256
    @maskito4256 4 роки тому +2

    What a magnificent piece.

  • @Numero-xv8gg
    @Numero-xv8gg 4 роки тому +1

    One of the most beautiful watches in the market

  • @SuperSportMTL
    @SuperSportMTL 4 роки тому +1

    My favourite watch from Patek!

  • @kierankennedy8351
    @kierankennedy8351 4 роки тому

    Watch is breathtaking!Awesome filming

  • @yahiaalhamshary999
    @yahiaalhamshary999 4 роки тому

    Pure joy of mind and eye....thank you

  • @mahenderspider
    @mahenderspider 3 роки тому

    hi, what is the small date window for? and the little whte window? thanks..

  • @watcheswork1217
    @watcheswork1217 3 роки тому

    No problem with the title. Great work as usual!

  • @John_code
    @John_code 4 роки тому

    This watch is a master piece . Can't wrap my head around how those mechanical components can archive all that.
    Respect to the brand !

  • @lionelsarr6074
    @lionelsarr6074 4 роки тому +1

    What a perfect way to start the day! Thanks you

  • @axisskin
    @axisskin 4 роки тому

    As usual a pleasure to watch your video. Thank you

  • @OneAndrew98
    @OneAndrew98 4 роки тому

    1 of my 3 favorite Pateks ever. GG Patek

  • @Martin-pb7ts
    @Martin-pb7ts 4 роки тому

    You knock it out of the park every time.

  • @GraditelMacedonia
    @GraditelMacedonia 4 роки тому

    Nice... Reeeealy nice! Maybe missing automatic mechanism... Indicator for spring tension... Some fully jevel gears...

  • @johnrieley1404
    @johnrieley1404 4 роки тому

    Final reification, watch is not for telling time, but is sculpture. I love sculpture.

  • @JLchevz
    @JLchevz 4 роки тому

    This watch is just an object of desire. The bracelet is gorgeous

  • @enriqueparedespinel1694
    @enriqueparedespinel1694 4 роки тому

    You honor a artistic watch like this with your monologue.

  • @thefaceonthemoon.4691
    @thefaceonthemoon.4691 4 роки тому +7

    It would be nice to have a little documentary about time and humanity. From knowing am to pm too Quantum Physiology. How the time pieces held on to history.

  • @abishev
    @abishev 2 роки тому

    To my knowledge, the crown was invented by Antoine-Louis Breguet in 1830. "On 30 December 1830, Breguet sold to Comte Charles de L'Espine watch no. 4952, equipped with a knurled button in the pendant which fulfilled two functions: setting the hands and rewinding the watch."

  • @philipandrews5738
    @philipandrews5738 4 роки тому +1

    I’d love to see a behind the scenes video on how you make these videos

  • @aarondbritt
    @aarondbritt 4 роки тому +12

    I'm not sure this Patek is finished to a degree that is worth $200k. For example @ 2:25, you can clearly see the bottom of the "4" not aligned well on the spiral dial, @ 2:42, the 8 on the upper left has a small pip missing from its lower circle on the upper left side. @ 0:17, there is clearly an indent/mark on the clock works on the brass colored metal, at the lower left side. Also, at the same 0:17 you can see what looks like dust or scratches on the gear in the middle of the screen. @1:10, there is a small bubble on the 45 marker (between 40 and 50). These are just some examples. I know these flaws only show up on a Macro lens, but for a $200k Patek, I am disappointed. That being said, it is a gorgeous watch.

    • @edd2771
      @edd2771 4 роки тому +3

      Aaron Britt Despite your attention to detail, I suspect you may have missed that Watchfinder are “the pre-owned watch specialists”. They can only show the examples they have, which by definition have been used and serviced and will bear evidence of same. As for the dial imperfections, these are done by hand. Would you prefer robot perfection, or would this too preclude the watch from justifying its price? If so, there will have been no pleasing you, which I suspect may be the real problem.

    • @aarondbritt
      @aarondbritt 4 роки тому

      Ed D I agree with your sentiment, but have seen better by-hand dial’s and less imperfections from brands like Credor, A.Lange & Söhne etc. That had $30k or $50k price tags, with much higher quality. Just disappointed in this specific example, and think they could have had better quality control with this watch.

  • @ianwoollard2063
    @ianwoollard2063 4 роки тому

    I love the bracelet and case. An incredible piece

  • @manjunathnavada786
    @manjunathnavada786 4 роки тому +25

    This is not a watch. It's a Masterpiece.

    • @patrickfrench1569
      @patrickfrench1569 4 роки тому +1

      Agreed.

    • @7khon731
      @7khon731 4 роки тому +5

      It's also a reason to chop someone's arm off and steal it

    • @ilya399
      @ilya399 4 роки тому

      Yeah masterpiece..... For master idiots....
      Voutalinen, dufour, smith maybe masterpiece, lange, moser and patek = same quality of rolex, hand finished industrisl watches.

    • @wolper2155
      @wolper2155 4 роки тому

      @@ilya399 Hi Ivan. What do you think about Vacheron Constantin?

    • @rayleeaustralia
      @rayleeaustralia 4 роки тому

      7khon yes. It really depends on which country you’re in😂

  • @fast03vette4me
    @fast03vette4me 4 роки тому +1

    I need one of these, and all the trimmings behind wearing that kind of watch might be nice. For a change I can believe in.

  • @SpilkersKompass
    @SpilkersKompass 4 роки тому +1

    Poetry on mechanical artwork.
    Wow!

  • @toocool5355
    @toocool5355 4 роки тому

    Self proclaimed watch expert. Nice

  • @proimsat
    @proimsat 4 роки тому +15

    Finally learned the art of the catchy title have we? :D

  • @scottlalonde2878
    @scottlalonde2878 4 роки тому

    Awesome video, thank you.

  • @devarshdave
    @devarshdave 4 роки тому

    Really a great 👍 watch but what is the difference between 5270 and 5270 R as the R is somewhat cheaper?

  • @WolfyTime
    @WolfyTime 4 роки тому

    I think it would be great it you featured Christopher Ward's single pusher chronograph compared to some of its older and more expensive swiss counterparts. Either the C900 or theC9 ME 109.

  • @EatLiftSleepAU
    @EatLiftSleepAU 4 роки тому +1

    Would love to see a video on the 5270p salmon dial.

  • @statuswan
    @statuswan 4 роки тому +11

    Does this $200,000 watch have a scratch on the dial right above "Geneve" between N and E?

    • @porvoonosho
      @porvoonosho 4 роки тому

      statuswan Yes. Yes it does.

    • @iloveg25
      @iloveg25 4 роки тому

      Yeah, it's totally not a 200.000 usd quality check...

    • @olasek7972
      @olasek7972 3 роки тому

      No such scratch that I can see and watched it at different angles, sorry.

  • @s802487
    @s802487 4 роки тому +1

    The v lovely 5270! Nothing short of a masterpiece. Great vid as usual but change the title it’s undeserving to both the watch/channel

  • @matthiasoverley4685
    @matthiasoverley4685 4 роки тому +4

    Love this one

  • @UzairW
    @UzairW 4 роки тому +2

    The video title is a joke people!!!
    Those decrying it as a clickbait title pandering to the great unwashed clearly haven't been fans for a long time of the channel. Sharp witty wordplay is the hallmark of this dude, and a major reason for the channel's success. There are plenty of watch experts out there, but no one else with such humor and class and a nod to both history and pop culture.
    I mean c'mon - a few months ago he started his video with "Thissss is..." a clever reference for car geeks who follow Doug DeMuro's car channel.

  • @TheBelse
    @TheBelse 4 роки тому

    I love the camera work on the skeleton mechanism ..any chance of some slo motion gyroscopic tourbillion action? That would be something ...big up the show.

  • @suushhii
    @suushhii 4 роки тому +28

    1:40 Is that a scratch between the (N & E) of GENEVE ?

    • @rayleeaustralia
      @rayleeaustralia 4 роки тому +2

      Franz Ampo 😱

    • @hectorgaray3963
      @hectorgaray3963 4 роки тому +3

      no, is a very small spider hair.

    • @sushimshah2896
      @sushimshah2896 4 роки тому +2

      Could be on the sapphire crystal, it's one of those things that you can't unsee no matter how much you try

    • @shaunolson8913
      @shaunolson8913 4 роки тому +4

      TIS BUT A SCRATCH!

    • @citizen116
      @citizen116 4 роки тому +1

      I looked at it with my loupe and see many dial imperfections. It may be my screenshot. Looks really bad up close.

  • @PatrickRyan147
    @PatrickRyan147 4 роки тому +1

    I like the Mona Lisa comment at the end 😎

  • @paulzz81
    @paulzz81 4 роки тому

    It's beautiful. Great review.

  • @DonLee1980
    @DonLee1980 Рік тому

    i remember a couple years ago, a 5711 steel went up to the price of this. Now, this is still worth $200k, but the 5711 down to 100k. That is because this watch ain't about hype. It's pure horology and the intrinsic value is the quality of the watch cannot be taken away.

  • @albertmyers7176
    @albertmyers7176 4 роки тому

    Thank you for all these great vids

  • @ant7699
    @ant7699 3 роки тому

    I had a beautiful accurist back in 1998. I know its just an accurist.. Battery but it was incredible. 4 buttons and it had data chromo.. Everything.. And it was all automated with buttons... No crown. Beautiful blue sunshine face... Ogld and steel strap. It was the business. Ahead of its time... Never seen anything like it since

  • @raphaelortegacoste6509
    @raphaelortegacoste6509 4 роки тому +2

    The Salmon version 5270p is worth dying for... a future classic

  • @ingra888
    @ingra888 4 роки тому +1

    Always loved Patek, if I was offered the cheapest Patek over a more expensive Rolex ‘model’ I’d go for the Patek any day!

    • @harvald100
      @harvald100 4 роки тому +1

      PP is different league to Rolex

  • @watchdealer
    @watchdealer 3 роки тому +1

    I own this watch in Platinum, it's amazing.

  • @RobertBrownieJr
    @RobertBrownieJr 4 роки тому

    Brilliant review.

  • @petersampson5202
    @petersampson5202 4 роки тому +1

    IT WOULD BE A MIRACLE!

  • @richardgraham8568
    @richardgraham8568 3 роки тому

    It is a beautiful watch, but I would trade a couple features for an automatic movement so I don’t have to wind it every few days. Then I would not have to start resetting all the functions if it winds to a stop.

  • @NickSinghSG
    @NickSinghSG 4 роки тому +4

    Watch Expert Reacts to Incredible Patek Philippe Watch. His reaction will SHOCK you!

  • @thebravesimo
    @thebravesimo 4 роки тому

    love the naration

  • @danielcharrie7125
    @danielcharrie7125 3 роки тому +1

    Amazing, amazing, amazing
    I am so glad that there are still people in this messed-up world who value perfection from their own hands,ty! and God bless you!
    God is perfection.

  • @justinv3360
    @justinv3360 4 роки тому +1

    I clapped my hands when the video ended

  • @edwardsauve4836
    @edwardsauve4836 4 роки тому

    What a glorious machine .

  • @hocly22
    @hocly22 4 роки тому

    Who CARES what the title is? It's a masterful video just like this watch. It doesn't affect you what the channel calls these videos, or the sort of audience it brings in, as long as you get some value out of the videos. I know I love these videos not for their titles....nor do I give a single shit about who else is watching them

  • @MrPINKFL0YD
    @MrPINKFL0YD 4 роки тому

    Love the pilot gmt

  • @rickj8859
    @rickj8859 4 роки тому

    The 1851 is the year, that Patek Philippe was established e.g. way after number of well known brands. And whilst Patek Philippe charges fortune for a 4 year calendar, you can get 100 year calendar from IWC, or JLC for substantially lesser amount of money and the similar, 4 year calendar with chronograph from the likes of Breitling, for lot less.

  • @the_real_micha
    @the_real_micha 4 роки тому

    Awesome macro views - I love it - also an awesome watch

  • @English2Elvish
    @English2Elvish 3 роки тому

    The 5270G is my grail watch... I'll settle for a collection that has either a white 116500ln or grey 116519ln and a 5119G :)

  • @prasenjeet111
    @prasenjeet111 4 роки тому +1

    Best piece of Mechanical Engineering on the Planet

  • @Marginal391
    @Marginal391 3 роки тому

    Great presentation and a great watch.
    Thank you :-).

  • @jackyou3145
    @jackyou3145 4 роки тому +7

    Im sure Hong Kong will be off that supplier list. R.I.P. Hong Kong!

  • @Uniongamers
    @Uniongamers 4 роки тому

    Is that a mark I see above the 'n' in Geneve? 1:38

  • @KatwereJames
    @KatwereJames 4 роки тому +1

    Beautiful, but equally scary. Thanks for the review.

  • @1swm1
    @1swm1 4 роки тому

    I'd love to see a review on the PAM 171 with a bracelet.

  • @ianmcdonald3053
    @ianmcdonald3053 4 роки тому +17

    Rarely do I ever see a watch I would genuinely enjoy owning, this has to be everything I want in a watch. Too bad my broke ass will have to put up with my G-Shock!

    • @rayleeaustralia
      @rayleeaustralia 4 роки тому +1

      Ian McDonald probably gives you the same information 😅

    • @jacc88888
      @jacc88888 4 роки тому +1

      Glue a hi-res image of the Patek’s movement on the back of your G-shock and pretend! After all the G shock has an annual calendar (maybe even a perpetual one?) and a stopwatch! EDIT: Know what you mean though: this Patek is both everything you need and want in a watch.

    • @DouglasRosser
      @DouglasRosser 4 роки тому +2

      Even if you had this watch, you'd need to keep your G-Shock around to tell the time in the dark ;-)

    • @jacc88888
      @jacc88888 4 роки тому

      Douglas Rosser Good point. Forgot about the lack of lume...

    • @13Hangfire
      @13Hangfire 4 роки тому +2

      My G-Shock does everything that PP does... did I mention the lights and audible alarms?

  • @waelthassan
    @waelthassan 4 роки тому +8

    It is a shame you spent so much time talking about the history of Patek Philippe and the concept of Perpetual Calendar, rather than talking about this specific 5270/1R and what differentiates it from other PPs and ALSs for example. Though as usual, great videography and story telling