Larissa Waters speaks to G-G pay rise: Just because something is convention doesn't make it right

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 26 жов 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 33

  • @timhocking529
    @timhocking529 4 місяці тому +9

    If the GG must have the pay rise then have the King pay for the pay rise.

  • @fashioncitymetaverse
    @fashioncitymetaverse Місяць тому +2

    Thank you for sharing

  • @wmlundine
    @wmlundine 4 місяці тому +4

    ...where have the greens been all my life❤️?

  • @Arachne-qw1vr
    @Arachne-qw1vr 4 місяці тому +4

    All salaries should be capped at 70% above the average Australian wage. Bonuses should not exceed $10K. And the CPI needs to be calculated as an actual number, not a percentage of a number; thats criminal.

    • @Arachne-qw1vr
      @Arachne-qw1vr 4 місяці тому +4

      Any $ left over can go into the climate recovery fund, Ag.Regen supervised by Elders and/or into health care for at least the next five years. I reckon.

  • @808create5
    @808create5 Місяць тому

    Thank you ❤

  • @darthex0
    @darthex0 3 місяці тому +1

    👏

  • @lesliedevlin8501
    @lesliedevlin8501 3 місяці тому +1

    The government gave the GG the BIG 💰💰💰So the GG WON'T SACK SACK SACK government Les from Perth WA and that's no 🐂🐂🐂

  • @malcolmfrancis5083
    @malcolmfrancis5083 2 місяці тому +1

    The incoming GG needs a pay rise to afford a private jet - or I suppose he can use Adam Bandts jet.

  • @peterreay1373
    @peterreay1373 4 місяці тому +6

    Yes, I'm the grandson of a Woman' Advocate of 1915 that gave position to women of all backgrounds to equal pay position in society. I'm now facing NO Pension, or delayed, till I'm 67 years of age. All that work to help and support people thru a Covid covert misinformation, has cost me dearly. And to think a Labor Party Government, who supports an APARTHEID State as Zionist Israel, is the final insult to my Jewish ancestry - of since 1788 Convict in Sydney Cove. The Governor General can announce a pay cut, and actually help women struggling, with the now extraordinary amount of near half a million dollars. I am so disgusted by this capitalistic thinking war mongering of creepy racists and sickening brutality against children and women, that somehow it must be fixed by the overworked taxed people, to only find our pension delayed by people as ALP, LNP 1 Nation - serving the Wealthy People first. Well said Sen Larissa Waters - I'm struggling to collect enough for a Bond for the next unexpected shift in landlord requests or ultimate homelessness as so many others.

  • @Arachne-qw1vr
    @Arachne-qw1vr 4 місяці тому +4

    Hey, why am I not seeing temporary caps on CEO's? Like, we see 'temporary' measures put in place for everyone else, which eventually become permanent. But I bet putting a three year mandatory cap on salaries above 200k/pa will balance out a bunch.

    • @ichibot-app
      @ichibot-app 4 місяці тому

      Why would there be a cap on CEOs? They are literally driving the company. If it weren't for them, the company would fold. You're clueless. They're not a charity or not-for-profit ya turkey. Most of them started the companies they lead from scratch. Otherwise - they can just not take the company public... and just keep it all to themselves as a private company... and then everyone loses.

    • @AlphGen
      @AlphGen 4 місяці тому

      A CEO has goals for a company to achieve and some of those companies are huge, pay peanuts get monkeys when you need strategic thinkers who can achieve so every employee achievers and the investors

    • @pmcamacho6447
      @pmcamacho6447 3 місяці тому

      ​@@ichibot-apptrue IPA troll.

    • @pmcamacho6447
      @pmcamacho6447 3 місяці тому

      ​@@AlphGenanother young liberal troll

    • @ichibot-app
      @ichibot-app 3 місяці тому

      @@pmcamacho6447 IPA?

  • @nottenvironmental6208
    @nottenvironmental6208 4 місяці тому +1

    Yes, but why tie Australia being a Republic to this issue? Talk about huge government costs and poor performance.

    • @adgone01
      @adgone01 3 місяці тому +1

      Uh, probably because of what the role of governor general is?
      What huge government costs and poor performance exactly are you talking about?

    • @nottenvironmental6208
      @nottenvironmental6208 3 місяці тому +1

      @adgone01 and the required referendum is different from changing pay, for those who don't understand. Thus ignore pay and focus on the required referendum or control pay. Not rocket science just doing the job of a member who gets outcomes which the Greens are poor at. Having a governor general and support is a waste of money for Australia

    • @adgone01
      @adgone01 3 місяці тому +1

      @@nottenvironmental6208 Yeah, so become a republic and eliminate the role of GG.

    • @nottenvironmental6208
      @nottenvironmental6208 3 місяці тому

      @@adgone01 yep, except the community needs to be supportive. Currently, the support has been for mass wealth transfer out of Australia via the Lib, Lab COALition. This support is fading as the lies are exposed.

  • @vincentcacciola7161
    @vincentcacciola7161 4 місяці тому +1

    Nothing but dribble

  • @Beehive66
    @Beehive66 4 місяці тому +2

    The Australian greens needs to get back to environmental issues. Please go after the Coalition's nuclear plans with extreme prejudice.

    • @dragonzord6615
      @dragonzord6615 4 місяці тому

      The greens don't need to, the nuclear plans will literally never happen.

    • @TheNakedWombat
      @TheNakedWombat 4 місяці тому +3

      The Greens aren't a single issue party.

    • @vincentcacciola7161
      @vincentcacciola7161 4 місяці тому

      A lot of property investors in the green party how do you reduce the carbon footprint of a country by increasing its population hilarious

    • @Beehive66
      @Beehive66 4 місяці тому

      @@TheNakedWombat Then why are they called Green? It may not be their only issue, but it's their primary one. If it's not they should switch to 'Rainbow party'

    • @TheNakedWombat
      @TheNakedWombat 4 місяці тому

      @@Beehive66 Because their roots is environmentalism. You can't do more than one thing at a time but that's problem. You should learn how to do more than one thing at a time.
      Your cognitive disability is not a reason for the Greens to limit itself to your cognitive decline.