Will Heyward they don’t government has the ability to print money through the federal reserve government does not need your money it makes the fucking stuff idiot
@@iamasmurf1122 More money doesn't create more net resources, only through productive labour are resources generated. Peoples time and energy spent on this means time taken and energy away from a more productive endeavour.
I'm a woman and I think this dishonest office needs to be disbanded. They're not helping anyone, they're making things worse for everyone. All that matters to them is power.
I will say this. The women who was answering the questions, didn't seem triggered at all which made her responses seem much more genuine. But her colleague ruined that by getting triggered out loud lmao.
My girlfriend tells me stories everyday about things that have happened in her office that day and it’s just all toxic, bitchy stupid arguments. It’s an office full of women and it sounds like a horrific working environment.
I love this man, he is so level headed and has a good grasp on logic and how to interpret data correctly. He also is great at asking hard questions in a non-antagonistic way. I wish every politician was like him.
As a male I feel I am massively under represented or discriminated against in relation to support in the family courts, in support should I be victim of family violence , in criminal sentencing, in relation to divorce and financial settlement, in relation to my children being subject to family violence, in relation to child access, in relation to employment in aged care, child care, nursing, health and beauty. I am discriminated against when working in the sex industry, This list is far longer than what is mentioned here. Leyonhjelm = equality. Thank you David.
My experience has informed me that the Left men in politics have given too much ground to woman like these and on the other hand the right wing in politics have held their position in politics at the expense of the Left men!! I invite you to take a long look at the British Labour Party?
@@bloodmuffin123 Wait a minute - you claim that it's a `complete waste of tax payers [sic] money' without knowing what it does? How do you know it's a waste? Clearly you made it up
As usual there is a watermelon senator (green on the outside, red on the inside) chirping in the background showing exactly how little respect they have for the process and the citizens their colleagues represent.
@@alexolife yeh, the Canadian. Apparently lying on a federal form/declaration is only a crime if you or I do it. If you're a Pollie you'll be back in your old job inside of a year.
I have never in my life heard a guy talk about "work-life balance", but I hear women frequently talk about this, which is code for "less time at work more doing other stuff", that's fine, just don't expect to get paid the same for the same work, because its not. If your colleagues are still in the office when you leave, or are there before you arrive, you are NOT doing the same work for the same pay.
"how many indiginous?" "...... ah.... I think we have 1........" etc etc etc Some would say he is trolling IRL, but they would be wrong. Your killing it Dave, stick it up em. Top bloke
I am sure all of those women have a take home pay of far more than most men. I have never earned the "average wage" by a long shot, nor do I know anyone who does, but I don't go around spouting "average pay gap". I have raised a family of six children, have one wife, owe noting to the banks and own everything I have. We used to call it living within our means or count the pennies and the pounds take care of themselves.
Sen your questions were fantastic, the answer is not so much. It is hard to believe there is such a thing as the office for women. The simple fact, you could have equality of outcomes or equality of opportunity. You cannot ever ever have them both.
The immediate and obvious hypocrisy of an office for women claiming to promote gender equality is as galling as the portmanteau of feminism itself. Why oh why are so many men such spineless Uriah Heeps in the face of blatant female chauvinism. There are good women speaking out about it but they have no skin in the game. As far as I can make out David is probably the most principled man in Parliament.
@@genderstudiesreview5012 Weak willed men letting shitty women go unchecked. When a man is shit a woman tells him so and he pulls his head in. When a woman is shit she is applauded and accepted. Imagine a bonsai tree neatly trimmed vs one that grows wildly.
"Senator LEYONHJELM: The Office of women was established to advance gender equality and improve the lives of Australian women. Would you consider your work to be undermined if there was also an office for men? Senator WATERS: It is called parliament, Senator Leyonhjelm." Parliament is an office for parliamentarians who are just as reliant on women's votes if not more so than men's. Why do you think we have had fundamentally flawed family law for more 40 years? Senator WATERS is a fool!
If it is just around the corner the women's office will fix it with rejigged statistics so that it ain't just around the corner. You know with the way the definition of domestic violence is changed to always show it perpetually "spiking" or there is a "crisis"
@Reverend Eslam + @Roger Roger It is a play on an old Soviet saying that communism is just around the corner. I agree with both of your responses, i was being sardonic in my OP :)
" Gender equality is just around the corner comrades. Forever just around the corner that is." I basically typed that above Damn you bob You beat me too it
0:22 "It's called Parliament, Senator Leyonhjelm" - Did she just actually say that??? The Australian Parliament is the "Office for Men"??? How deluded these women are! ...and don't they stammer and stumble when asked to speak of substance in their work. They really do think life is a picnic, don't they? 25% of staff are men - we strive for gender equality (except in our dept.). Would we wind up if successful? ...er, let's not even go there, eh? What a farce is our pandering to this tripe! Well done, yet again, Senator Leyonhjelm. Bravo sir, Bravissimo!
Tina, you might want to consider that as a result of this 'me too' movement women are now going to take a dramatic hit as more and more companies stop hiring women because they are essentially dangerous to have in the work force, take for example a company having a male employee who has been there for 20+ years, knows the job like the back of his hand, works very efficiently, doesn't loose anytime off because he has his periods doesn't have a bad attitude and can be ask or told what to do at anytime without any problem, then the company brings in a couple of females because the government told them they have to, the first thing that starts happening is they loaf on him and avoid lifting anything heavy expecting him to do it for them because they are ladies and if he was a gentleman he would, and when pay day comes they expect the same pay as what he gets, and then comes the rumor that there is a promotion in the pipeline, those women see him as a major threat that has to be removed and the next thing you know there is a false accusation of sexual misconduct and the women will be believed without question or proof and the company is now forced to sack there best employee, and then the company starts going downhill because they now have personnel who can't perform.
@@tinaryan4023 Tina from what I understand companies are now beginning to use application for employment forms that ask various questions and from the info the applicant puts on the form they then select suitable applicants, meaning they have the option of selecting on a suitable bases by way of personality and character and that pretty much closes the door, probably not on all women but certainly paves the way for them to avoid employing radicals etc.
@@brianmillar5075 yes a strategy like that is needed. It's alarming to hear that men are beginning to feel nervous about being alone with a female colleague for fear of false accusations.
My girlfriend comes home drunk and attacks me. I go upstairs to avoid trouble and try sleep before work. Trouble follows me upstairs. Police come and take me away and put an avo on me. Police victimise the victim. and that gives a green light to the girlfriend to keep abusing me. #MenCan’tWin
"you realise most perpetrators are men" interrupted Larissa Waters, pushing more fake feminist statistics: intimate partner violence is an overwhelmingly reciprocal phenomenon, and when you factor in the violence perpetrated against children it is women who are the majority of perpetrators. What's more, on a per capita basis, the highest rates of domestic violence occurs in lesbian relationships. This gynocentric misandry is to be expected but not tolerated.
"It's called parliament" What law is preventing women from participating in parliament? False equivalence. If you're going to make snide comments, maybe have them make sense. Correlation doesn't equal causation.
Follow-up questions to the percentage of male in the OfW; how may of those are in senior management positions? Does the OfW operate in accordance with its own objectives? Some more questions: What is the gender pay gap in the OfW? How does the focus of the OfW, namely women, ensure equality for both men and women? The focus on flexible working conditions for men with a view to increasing their time with family is commendable. What has the OfW done in respect to equitable treatment of fathers and their children in the family justice system?
One could sense the misandry of the interjecting woman/women. Another question you might have asked is; 'Of the women on the committee, how many are lesbians?'. :) Absurd that at a time of such female systemic advantage taxpayers fund a portfolio having to do with the interest/welfare of women.
"Unpaid work" is an interesting way to describe being supported by a partner and Welfare, especially given that the vast bulk of a man's income is spent on other members of the family - willingly in most cases. Does it encompass all family duties done by either partner? Is that part of the conversation?
Larissa Waters... Kicked out of the Senate for not even reading the Constitution and falling foul of sect. 44. Comes back declaring her first act is to try and ban donations from the coal industry, despite that also being ruled unconstitutional 5 years ago in the High Court. Rude, hypocritical and knows so much that isn't so.
It's a very well thought out line of questioning. Basically gets her to state that she doesn't believe that their operations would in any way be hindered by having men work there, and then has her admit that - for no discernable operational reason - her office is staffed almost exclusively by women, implying that, A: the office isn't interested in equality, it is interested in cushy jobs for the ladies; B: there is probably illegal gender discrimination in their hiring policy; C: As the office is staffed almost exclusively by women like her, it is unlikely that the focus is on actual "equality" and highly likely the focus is on getting nice things for themselves.
How about they get gender quotas in aged care, I worked in aged care for 11 years and there were only three men working there in that time, and some old men dont want a woman to look after them but if an old lady doesn't want a man to look after them they get what they want.... the bloody double standards is ridiculous
I have been driving for months through a roadside work site......with two female workers....after two months i realized something....they don't work...they haven't got a mark or spec of dirt on them....why....because they don't work and no one says anything....they just stand there with the signs everytime while the guys do the actual work....there's your equality.
Just out of interest, I've watched a few videos of this Senator putting these liars and charlatans through the mangle. How is he regarded in Australia?
All he did was ask a question and the overbearing feminism undermines him at every turn because his questions are about pointing out how they only help females and about helping men .
"Would the Office for Women wind itself down if it achieved its ambition of gender equality?" Love this question. He knew it would be challenged so the answer is left hanging... Well played good sir.
Amazing things happen when you simply ask questions to learn about the other position. The drive for such an agenda by these lunatics is so strong they can barely contain themselves when challenged. The irony that her office isn't diverse is lost on them.
Wonderful questions! Would have liked to have heard a question around, what measures are being put in place for industries where women earn more than men. e.g. modelling.
he asks them simple questions... I'm glad at least that lady that did most of the talking remained civil... the others "erg gerd" ...very professional...
It's amazing that a man (male human) be taking this stand: he is opening himself to criticism of mysoginy like crazy! ..... unfortunately, I would prefer to see women taking on these challenges, but ALL MY BEST to Mr. Leyonhjelm!
If Australia is ever looking for easy budget cuts I think we've found a great place to start. I cannot think of a more useless expenditure of taxpayer funds than this government sponsored peddler of nonsense.
"Their ability to save for retirement " lets look at that, if they were married and stayed home or worked part time, they would enjoy the benefits of their husbands nest egg, and if they separated, they would be entitled to at least half of his super. If single they would have the opportunity to work full time on the same pay rate as their male counterparts doing the same work......,unless their a stripper, then they'd earn more than the men strippers as a example.
Early Feminists: We want to enter the workforce, break the glass ceiling, work the same jobs as men. Todays Feminist: What? We have to actually compete with men in the workplace? That's not fair!
We have to stop this division, violence against women or men, doesn't matter who perpetrates the violence the fact is all of us should be able to go about our business without being accosted in any way. The sooner we join together and say violence against any person regardless of gender or sexual preference is not acceptable then the sooner we will have equality.
I wouldn't worry to much David, eventually those supporting the forever reduction of issues into minorities concerns within minorities concerns should arrive at the smallest minority, the individual, sometime next year.....
I've said it before and I will say it again this guy is my new hero. I didn't think was possible to have a politician with a brain. I'm from America and sadly all we have are corrupt POS
I love how he just refuses to address the child in the room. I don't always have the strength to do that, in fact I think I almost always retort and get trapped into a pointless argument. Stay on point, don't insult, don't let others derail the debate/conversation. I fking love this guy, can he come work for the US senate?
Whoever yelled out "It's mostly men causing violence" needs to be removed from parliament. 2/3 is not "mostly" and even if it was 99% men does that mean that all men are guilty and we shouldn't help that 1%?
In this day and age, I would love to hear 1 simple question in regards to the debunked gender pay gap issue: If gender is a social construct, and that there are now currently around 70 odd genders, how do you actually calculate this mythological pay gap?
Feminism is discriminatory. These offices should be abolished.
I can't believe my taxes pay for these psychopath women.
Will Heyward they don’t government has the ability to print money through the federal reserve government does not need your money it makes the fucking stuff idiot
Michael Wilson you pay for it through inflation
@@iamasmurf1122 What you said just show how much you don't understand about econimics.
@@iamasmurf1122 No government does not print money to pay public good you absolute moron
@@iamasmurf1122 More money doesn't create more net resources, only through productive labour are resources generated. Peoples time and energy spent on this means time taken and energy away from a more productive endeavour.
I'm a woman and I think this dishonest office needs to be disbanded. They're not helping anyone, they're making things worse for everyone. All that matters to them is power.
“It’s called parliament.” 😂😂 what a gem. I love the clip where they can’t fathom why the breakdown of wages per hours worked would be important.
Unsurprising that the hysterical one can't keep her "man bad woman good" sexism to herself
FYI That's Senator Larissa Waters from the Watermelon Party
Funky Munky / MAGA Trump 2020 I thought something was a bit fruity.
@@funkymunky7935 Is she the one on the extreme left of the panel, who has the empty look of death in her eyes? 4:25
I will say this. The women who was answering the questions, didn't seem triggered at all which made her responses seem much more genuine. But her colleague ruined that by getting triggered out loud lmao.
My girlfriend tells me stories everyday about things that have happened in her office that day and it’s just all toxic, bitchy stupid arguments. It’s an office full of women and it sounds like a horrific working environment.
So its basically a job placement program for feminists?
I love this man, he is so level headed and has a good grasp on logic and how to interpret data correctly. He also is great at asking hard questions in a non-antagonistic way. I wish every politician was like him.
As a male I feel I am massively under represented or discriminated against in relation to support in the family courts, in support should I be victim of family violence , in criminal sentencing, in relation to divorce and financial settlement, in relation to my children being subject to family violence, in relation to child access, in relation to employment in aged care, child care, nursing, health and beauty. I am discriminated against when working in the sex industry, This list is far longer than what is mentioned here. Leyonhjelm = equality. Thank you David.
My experience has informed me that the Left men in politics have given too much ground to woman like these and on the other hand the right wing in politics have held their position in politics at the expense of the Left men!!
I invite you to take a long look at the British Labour Party?
Who’s that lady that keeps interrupting and saying, “oh god”.
Larissa Waters...Watermelon party bitch!
She is the diety diversity minister, if you watch on Wednesdays she will be mumbling 'oh Allah'
It's someone who's not a lady.
@@TCFan30
What does "watermelon party" refer to/reference?
TRIGGERED
Departments like this is why we can't balance the books.
Yes, because departments allocate the money and set the tax rates, and not the government. Totally.
I was more implying this is a complete waste of tax payers money for a feminist imaginary problem.
@@bloodmuffin123 It's a pretty baseless implication when you demonstrate you don't know what you're talking about
And what pray tell does this department actually do ?
@@bloodmuffin123 Wait a minute - you claim that it's a `complete waste of tax payers [sic] money' without knowing what it does? How do you know it's a waste? Clearly you made it up
You can tell these women have an axe to grind with men, and are using the "Office for Women" as a guise to do it.
As usual there is a watermelon senator (green on the outside, red on the inside) chirping in the background showing exactly how little respect they have for the process and the citizens their colleagues represent.
Watermelon Party XD
Anybody know who that was? Christ, how infuriating.
"You know the majority of them are men!"
O, yeah? How many of them are black?
@@alexolife That was Larissa Waters
@@funkymunky7935 O, the Canadian.
@@alexolife yeh, the Canadian. Apparently lying on a federal form/declaration is only a crime if you or I do it. If you're a Pollie you'll be back in your old job inside of a year.
I have never in my life heard a guy talk about "work-life balance", but I hear women frequently talk about this, which is code for "less time at work more doing other stuff", that's fine, just don't expect to get paid the same for the same work, because its not. If your colleagues are still in the office when you leave, or are there before you arrive, you are NOT doing the same work for the same pay.
"how many indiginous?"
"...... ah.... I think we have 1........"
etc etc etc
Some would say he is trolling IRL, but they would be wrong.
Your killing it Dave, stick it up em. Top bloke
I was waiting for him to ask how many transgender muslims they have
""""equality""" ;)
It sounded incredibly patronizing, as if she were referring to a collection of fancy poultry.
He is trolling. He thinks the whole thing is a joke - which it is.
“Gender pay-gap” AGAIN?
Seriously 😐
Reverend Eslam I’m going to start a business and just employ women! Save money
@@EDGEDAZZA right 😁
I am sure all of those women have a take home pay of far more than most men. I have never earned the "average wage" by a long shot, nor do I know anyone who does, but I don't go around spouting "average pay gap". I have raised a family of six children, have one wife, owe noting to the banks and own everything I have. We used to call it living within our means or count the pennies and the pounds take care of themselves.
m.ua-cam.com/video/-pdnkbs4l_g/v-deo.html
Get some of that into you 😂😂😂
We have the same crazy feminist in Canada
THIS MAN IS BRILLIANT! I love this guy!!! Give him a medal!
You could almost see the kek smirk on his face during the last question 😂
Shadilay
You can always tell a woman's getting heated when she starts blinking a lot, or looking intensely in a certain spot while she talks to you
Sen your questions were fantastic, the answer is not so much. It is hard to believe there is such a thing as the office for women.
The simple fact, you could have equality of outcomes or equality of opportunity. You cannot ever ever have them both.
Hear bloody hear!
Yes. Equality of outcomes. Women want the honor , get the badge but not do any work.
Great stuff taking on the female chauvinists David.
Misandrists
The immediate and obvious hypocrisy of an office for women claiming to promote gender equality is as galling as the portmanteau of feminism itself. Why oh why are so many men such spineless Uriah Heeps in the face of blatant female chauvinism. There are good women speaking out about it but they have no skin in the game. As far as I can make out David is probably the most principled man in Parliament.
many men have no idea. they believe their programming.
@@genderstudiesreview5012 Weak willed men letting shitty women go unchecked. When a man is shit a woman tells him so and he pulls his head in. When a woman is shit she is applauded and accepted. Imagine a bonsai tree neatly trimmed vs one that grows wildly.
Get it right female Chauvinist sows
"Senator LEYONHJELM: The Office of women was established to advance gender equality and improve the lives of Australian women. Would you consider your work to be undermined if there was also an office for men?
Senator WATERS: It is called parliament, Senator Leyonhjelm."
Parliament is an office for parliamentarians who are just as reliant on women's votes if not more so than men's. Why do you think we have had fundamentally flawed family law for more 40 years? Senator WATERS is a fool!
Thanks for pointing out who said that.
Neither are desirable or necessary. One is discriminatory.
-
@OzPol it doesn't matter how many females are in parliament because the males will agree with the females rule because it will increase their vote
Gender equality is just around the corner comrades.
Forever just around the corner that is.
If it is just around the corner the women's office will fix it with rejigged statistics so that it ain't just around the corner. You know with the way the definition of domestic violence is changed to always show it perpetually "spiking" or there is a "crisis"
Equality is non-existent in this phenomenal sphere.
Equality only exists in abstract concepts such as mathematics.
@Reverend Eslam + @Roger Roger
It is a play on an old Soviet saying that communism is just around the corner.
I agree with both of your responses, i was being sardonic in my OP :)
" Gender equality is just around the corner comrades.
Forever just around the corner that is."
I basically typed that above
Damn you bob
You beat me too it
" Forever just around the corner that is."
@Roger Roger
Reference to their idea of permanent revolution
0:22 "It's called Parliament, Senator Leyonhjelm" - Did she just actually say that??? The Australian Parliament is the "Office for Men"???
How deluded these women are! ...and don't they stammer and stumble when asked to speak of substance in their work. They really do think life is a picnic, don't they?
25% of staff are men - we strive for gender equality (except in our dept.). Would we wind up if successful? ...er, let's not even go there, eh? What a farce is our pandering to this tripe!
Well done, yet again, Senator Leyonhjelm. Bravo sir, Bravissimo!
Four times now, I have recieved notification of likes to this comment ...and yet, only one shows. Shadow-banning is real alright!
...then 5 more appear (with no notification) ...is someone trying to cover their tracks with tokenism??
"It's called parliament, senator Leyonhjelm" Says the woman who literally works in parliament....
Who is it?
Empowerment
I Love this Senator....wish there were more like him prepared to ask questions of this standard.
If you want equality of outcome, you don't want equality.
As a woman I agree with winding down the Office for Woman but they will never concede to achieving gender equality
Tina, you might want to consider that as a result of this 'me too' movement women are now going to take a dramatic hit as more and more companies stop hiring women because they are essentially dangerous to have in the work force, take for example a company having a male employee who has been there for 20+ years, knows the job like the back of his hand, works very efficiently, doesn't loose anytime off because he has his periods doesn't have a bad attitude and can be ask or told what to do at anytime without any problem, then the company brings in a couple of females because the government told them they have to, the first thing that starts happening is they loaf on him and avoid lifting anything heavy expecting him to do it for them because they are ladies and if he was a gentleman he would, and when pay day comes they expect the same pay as what he gets, and then comes the rumor that there is a promotion in the pipeline, those women see him as a major threat that has to be removed and the next thing you know there is a false accusation of sexual misconduct and the women will be believed without question or proof and the company is now forced to sack there best employee, and then the company starts going downhill because they now have personnel who can't perform.
@@brianmillar5075 Employers need to build a good legal case for not hiring feminists. That would be a good start.
@@tinaryan4023 Tina from what I understand companies are now beginning to use application for employment forms that ask various questions and from the info the applicant puts on the form they then select suitable applicants, meaning they have the option of selecting on a suitable bases by way of personality and character and that pretty much closes the door, probably not on all women but certainly paves the way for them to avoid employing radicals etc.
@@brianmillar5075 yes a strategy like that is needed. It's alarming to hear that men are beginning to feel nervous about being alone with a female colleague for fear of false accusations.
@@tinaryan4023 unfortunately u have to blame your sisters for this, undoubtedly a lot of innocent women will suffer for there lies.
women have life so easy and they want it easier and easier
Mgtow Boo Boo THIS
My girlfriend comes home drunk and attacks me. I go upstairs to avoid trouble and try sleep before work. Trouble follows me upstairs.
Police come and take me away and put an avo on me.
Police victimise the victim. and that gives a green light to the girlfriend to keep abusing me.
#MenCan’tWin
He must've been biting his tongue all the way through that session.
Its astounding to think what things would be like without him in their way.
Like a boss
"I think we have one"
Lol token
He engages these people in debate and unmasks them as the posers and pretenders that they really are. Exquisite
This video needs the NPC meme pasted on. :run program menbad
"you realise most perpetrators are men" interrupted Larissa Waters, pushing more fake feminist statistics: intimate partner violence is an overwhelmingly reciprocal phenomenon, and when you factor in the violence perpetrated against children it is women who are the majority of perpetrators. What's more, on a per capita basis, the highest rates of domestic violence occurs in lesbian relationships. This gynocentric misandry is to be expected but not tolerated.
Domestic abuse is the same rate among men and women.
This bloke asks leading questions in such an innocent manner, it is really quite scary. Brilliant stuff.
Leyonhjelm, please continue existing.
Thank you Senator Leyonhjelm
"It's called parliament"
What law is preventing women from participating in parliament?
False equivalence.
If you're going to make snide comments, maybe have them make sense.
Correlation doesn't equal causation.
The hero Australia needs AND deserves
David Leyonhjelm Rocks
This is the most subtle roast i'v ever seen, wish this guy was in my country
Follow-up questions to the percentage of male in the OfW; how may of those are in senior management positions? Does the OfW operate in accordance with its own objectives?
Some more questions:
What is the gender pay gap in the OfW?
How does the focus of the OfW, namely women, ensure equality for both men and women?
The focus on flexible working conditions for men with a view to increasing their time with family is commendable. What has the OfW done in respect to equitable treatment of fathers and their children in the family justice system?
One could sense the misandry of the interjecting woman/women. Another question you might have asked is; 'Of the women on the committee, how many are lesbians?'. :) Absurd that at a time of such female systemic advantage taxpayers fund a portfolio having to do with the interest/welfare of women.
Senator David for PM!
"Unpaid work" is an interesting way to describe being supported by a partner and Welfare, especially given that the vast bulk of a man's income is spent on other members of the family - willingly in most cases. Does it encompass all family duties done by either partner? Is that part of the conversation?
Australia, you have a hero in Leyonhjelm!
I just found this channel and I can say I love this guy and the way he dismantles these feminists :-)
Larissa Waters...
Kicked out of the Senate for not even reading the Constitution and falling foul of sect. 44.
Comes back declaring her first act is to try and ban donations from the coal industry, despite that also being ruled unconstitutional 5 years ago in the High Court.
Rude, hypocritical and knows so much that isn't so.
It's a very well thought out line of questioning. Basically gets her to state that she doesn't believe that their operations would in any way be hindered by having men work there, and then has her admit that - for no discernable operational reason - her office is staffed almost exclusively by women, implying that,
A: the office isn't interested in equality, it is interested in cushy jobs for the ladies;
B: there is probably illegal gender discrimination in their hiring policy;
C: As the office is staffed almost exclusively by women like her, it is unlikely that the focus is on actual "equality" and highly likely the focus is on getting nice things for themselves.
I wonder why I haven’t I joined his party yet. I really must get around to this.
"Its called parliament" who was that harpy?
What a disgusting display ....discrimination against men !!!
How about they get gender quotas in aged care, I worked in aged care for 11 years and there were only three men working there in that time, and some old men dont want a woman to look after them but if an old lady doesn't want a man to look after them they get what they want.... the bloody double standards is ridiculous
I have been driving for months through a roadside work site......with two female workers....after two months i realized something....they don't work...they haven't got a mark or spec of dirt on them....why....because they don't work and no one says anything....they just stand there with the signs everytime while the guys do the actual work....there's your equality.
How dare you sir!? Could be, that the men never wash their clothes, and the women are more inclined too! :P
Who's the harpy that keeps piping up out of the peanut gallery.
Senator Larissa Waters from the Watermelon Party
Larissa Waters, the one who promoted the firefighters bash their wives loony.
@@redreuben5260 say no more.
Just out of interest, I've watched a few videos of this Senator putting these liars and charlatans through the mangle. How is he regarded in Australia?
That senator is sharp as hell!
We need more men like this in America to run for Congress. Asks questions and isn’t rude like these heifers.
Outstanding David
All he did was ask a question and the overbearing feminism undermines him at every turn because his questions are about pointing out how they only help females and about helping men .
"Would the Office for Women wind itself down if it achieved its ambition of gender equality?"
Love this question. He knew it would be challenged so the answer is left hanging...
Well played good sir.
Amazing things happen when you simply ask questions to learn about the other position. The drive for such an agenda by these lunatics is so strong they can barely contain themselves when challenged. The irony that her office isn't diverse is lost on them.
Mr Leyonhjelm keeps his tongue firmly in his cheek. A master of the Senate.
this one clearly has no idea of what David is getting at.
Wonderful questions! Would have liked to have heard a question around, what measures are being put in place for industries where women earn more than men. e.g. modelling.
This one just hurt. But thank you for doing quality control for these horrible people. A hero indeed, taking this responsibility on!
he asks them simple questions... I'm glad at least that lady that did most of the talking remained civil... the others "erg gerd" ...very professional...
i think im dumber for listing to this lol umm errr ummm errrr errrr
this is fantastic I love John clarke's satire where do I find the complete episode's
I couldn’t quite hear but who was the interjecting senator in the background?
doesn't even have a basic understanding of statistics...
Why are taxpayers paying for this?
There should be one office dedicated to the betterment of the entire population of the country. Job done.
It's amazing that a man (male human) be taking this stand: he is opening himself to criticism of mysoginy like crazy! ..... unfortunately, I would prefer to see women taking on these challenges, but ALL MY BEST to Mr. Leyonhjelm!
“We encourage men to work less.”
Instead, tell women that they need to work MORE if they want equal pay.
If Australia is ever looking for easy budget cuts I think we've found a great place to start. I cannot think of a more useless expenditure of taxpayer funds than this government sponsored peddler of nonsense.
I have never seen somebody be so calmly brutal.
I bet he likes the phrase "speak softly and carry a big stick" LOL
"Their ability to save for retirement " lets look at that, if they were married and stayed home or worked part time, they would enjoy the benefits of their husbands nest egg, and if they separated, they would be entitled to at least half of his super. If single they would have the opportunity to work full time on the same pay rate as their male counterparts doing the same work......,unless their a stripper, then they'd earn more than the men strippers as a example.
These women know the extent of their fraud, that what they choose their words so carefully.
MGTOW saves
Early Feminists: We want to enter the workforce, break the glass ceiling, work the same jobs as men.
Todays Feminist: What? We have to actually compete with men in the workplace? That's not fair!
We have to stop this division, violence against women or men, doesn't matter who perpetrates the violence the fact is all of us should be able to go about our business without being accosted in any way. The sooner we join together and say violence against any person regardless of gender or sexual preference is not acceptable then the sooner we will have equality.
I wouldn't worry to much David, eventually those supporting the forever reduction of issues into minorities concerns within minorities concerns should arrive at the smallest minority, the individual, sometime next year.....
So obviously you don't need to do an IQ test to do her job, Its time to wake up Australia
I've said it before and I will say it again this guy is my new hero. I didn't think was possible to have a politician with a brain. I'm from America and sadly all we have are corrupt POS
I love how he just refuses to address the child in the room. I don't always have the strength to do that, in fact I think I almost always retort and get trapped into a pointless argument.
Stay on point, don't insult, don't let others derail the debate/conversation. I fking love this guy, can he come work for the US senate?
What a rude snide remark at the beginning. In resonse to "What if there were an Office for Men?" "It's called parliament!!!" Absolutely puerile.
savage lol
"oh gawd *rolleyes*" - the general attitude to the idea that men have or face issues.
Some women just laugh
I absolutely love this dude I totally wish he was here in the states
An example of an intelligent, cool-headed man.
Those women are a joke that writes itself!
This should be taken off my taxes immediately. Im not busting my ass working 3 jobs to pay for this ideological nonsense.
Whoever yelled out "It's mostly men causing violence" needs to be removed from parliament. 2/3 is not "mostly" and even if it was 99% men does that mean that all men are guilty and we shouldn't help that 1%?
Thank you again senator for an outstanding job! Great to see the LD in Canberra electorates now too!
If they remove gender from Birth certificates this will mean these "women" will be out of a job. Lol
gender "equality"
Code for female supremacy
Code for double standards.
Only 25% are men but we're all for equality, and I can imagine what position those men hold or what influence they have in implementing their policies
In this day and age, I would love to hear 1 simple question in regards to the debunked gender pay gap issue: If gender is a social construct, and that there are now currently around 70 odd genders, how do you actually calculate this mythological pay gap?