Was Paul wrong about the law?
Вставка
- Опубліковано 28 чер 2014
- FIVE ALIVE - Chukat (Numbers 19:1-22:1)
Five Alive offers a textual sensitive Messiah-centered reflection on the weekly Torah from an Israeli Messianic perspective.
Visit us at: www.oneforisrael.org
It's so simple. Law is restrictions that come from ouside, faith is restrictions that come from within. That's the difference. They are the same rules, what's different is the motivation. Faith is the law written in a person's heart. And that's what Jesus was talking about when He said that the law should not be someting written on a stone, but something written in a person's heart. You abide by the law out of fear, out of obedience, out of your desire to be a respected member of society, and faith makes you abide by these rules out of love to God and people, because you feel it's what's right to do, it's what you want to do.
And I just wanted to add - a criminal who doesn't commit a crime just because he doesn't want to go to prison, is still a criminal by his nature. And in this case a sinner who doesn't sin is still a sinner, and brings death upon himself. The law condemns him, because it judges a person as a whole, including his heart, not just acts. While someone who doesn't commit crimes (sins) because it goes against his faith, against his heart, against his love to God - is a true son of God.
Wasn’t the new covenant that God would write His Law on our hearts? Jeremiah 31:33?
Amen. That is exactly the beautiful message of the law being fulfilled. 🙏
Sure but he Paul didn't preach to the gentiles to follow the law he knew they wouldn't do it at all.
I am so grateful for this organization! Bless you all! And thank you for being such a blessing to the world!
I thank u for the video. I had a hard time concentrating on the teaching due to the intrusive music.
I agree completely. The music in the background is a distraction. Please , no music during the message.
I literally couldn't take it and looked to see if anybody else mentioned it. Sure enough! Lol
Love this ministry! 💖🙌💖 My prayers for continued success in doing the Lord's will to this ministry and please pray for me as well..Thank you! 💖🙌💖
I Love Yeshua
I love how jewish brothers give an interpretation of the Scriptures in the New Testament.
Thanks for sharing with us non jews.
See Rabbi Tuvia Singer for a Jewish perspective on the NT
Lol
Awesome insight into scriptures Brothers. Feel like I understand Paul's thought process really well now. Thank you! Shalom.
Hi
I always thought Paul understood the law, but didn't realise his understanding came from the Sinai experience. When you read it you see the first thing YHWH wanted was that the entire assembly should be filled with the holy spirit[ like at Pentecost, which at that time was the first Shavuot! But they drew back and implored Moses to make the trumpets and to them frightening noise of YHWH stop. So the law was the only option after that. I just love how you One for Israel guys are presenting these vital truths.
Toosiya Brandt Wow, I never saw that.
You do realise that this teaching nullifies and makes void the Redemption of Christ as being the Eternal purpose of God. That meaning it was planned from before creation. I have NEVER read such nonsense and believe me I have read a lot of trash in my day😱
@@raymondquinton5960 and how exactly does it do that?? You do realize that in Genesis 15 God makes the covenant with Himself right? The benefits of the covenant are promised to Abraham and his children. Jesus is the inheritor of the promise and we take part in the inheritance through adoption.
Thanks brother you really opened my eyes. I thought Paul was very complicated in his writings, but this makes it simple. Shalom in Jesus names.
Great teaching! I agree that the klezmer music playing throughout the entire teaching was distracting. Maybe it should be just as an intro and outro?
well, I know other people didn't like it, but I liked the music in the BG.
Yeah me too
After I saw One For Israel's first video and heard the call to support this form of mission, I immediately accepted it. To this day, with every new video, I am happy that I am also one for Israel. I am happy that I can do something for Eli Jahuh Schua. May many Jews find Yeschua and hear his voice! So be it.
you're evil
Thank you n shalom. Greetings from Singapore.
Halleluijah Amen. Glory to Lord Jesus. Shalom from Bangladesh.
Love the music
God bless all
Really good message..i always come back to "will i BELIEVE Gods word?" Or not.... I have found in my walk with God time and time again it's what I believe will I believe God's word and when I do God intervenes in my life
Amen!
Thank you for sharing,
I will too.
Praying for you all.
Amen!! Praise God through Jesus Christ our Lord and savior
Amen, now I can understand the differences of men ways(death) compare that with God ways( Holy)are not equal. So thank you and God blesses
Thank you, love your videos.
I was never good at school but oooh I wish That I could study with you all, even if I failed I would love to learn from you all :) , loving all your new things --- drum roool ---the Spiritual world is NOW MOVING BACK TO ISRAEL
Title had me fooled .... was pleasantly surprised.
Thank God for grace
Thank you❤🙌🕊✝️
Great! Y’all r awesome
Interesting! Love it!
Love this!!!
The key here is to understand which law Paul is referring to. One must learn the 7 Spiritual Laws that Paul is teaching to better understand his point!
P
Thx for all you are doing for God’s kingdom. I have to tell you that while I loved your devotional today, it was hard to listen to because of the background music. Can yo turn the volume down on future episodes? Don’t know if I’m A.D.D, but it was very distracting and I almost quit listening. I thought you would like to know. GBU.
Thank you! Great Video! But I found it very hard listening because of the background music (way to loud)
Shalom
Paul counted the things he had through his own works as dung to be cast aside and buried " for the surpassing Knowledge of Yeshua our Lord. It was not something he did with disrespect . If we look at how long, about 17 years for the Lord Himself to lead him out and into complete Trust in Him.
I appreciate your input and teaching in my life ! Going to rest right here on The Rock of Ages! All my righteousness before God is complete in Him. I have rested and give Him all the Glory ! He did what I could not do. My knees are bowed down and my tongue confesses that He Is Lord ! Shalom Aleichem!
Wow! The difference between God's response to sin before giving the Law and after! Thanks for that Word of Truth! It confirms to me that today's gentile church does not take the Law and sin serious enuf.
What are your thoughts, are Christian required to keep the old covenant or the Mosaic covenant? Thank you.
Please lower the volume on the music, its too loud and makes it hard to hear you.
The music was a bad idea. Really distracts from the message.
Yes, the music is very distracting 😏
Yiddish, Jewish, Christianish.
Europeans tricking the world.
I enjoyed the music to be honest.
ELOHIM - THE GREAT I AM - HOLY LAWS ARE SWEET AND PERFECT TO MY TASTE. BUT i am very imperfect honestly. YESHUA’s HOLY GRACE IS MADE PERFECT FOR MY WEAKNESS. TODAH RABAH RUACH HAKODESH. TODAH RABAH YESHUA HAMOSIACH. HALLELU JAH. amen
Thank you for thoughtful insight and teaching. But I agree with others that the music, in this case, made it very difficult to absorb what was being said - just too busy and distracting. The ethnic "flavor" is good, but the mood was not helpful for this conversation. Blessings.
Please share the Love of the Son of God, He spoke Truth Forever, please write His Words in your Heart, and share them, please Forgive, and Pray for everyone. Immanuel, God with us...
Traffic laws are a guide for me, but when I break a law I am now under that law and must pay the penalty. Grace is where my guilt is placed on Yeshua. That doesn’t mean I can go on breaking the law.
So the Law of God stands.
Shabbat Shalom
This is such a horrible comment:
“That doesn’t mean I can go on breaking the law”!
The only thing this comment serves is judgement. If you understood what it means for the law to be written in your heart, such comments would not be made.
@@Will-nb8qkThe issue is the laws exist the motivation to follow them is different. But most people don't have the motivation to follow the laws and will continue knowingly sinning. It's not judgemental to say someone isn't following the law it's holding the accountability to the standard they should strive to uphold.
Paul taught the Torah: DO WE NULLIFY THE LAW BY FAITH? GOD FORBID, WE ESTABLISH THE LAW.
So you believe in stoning someone for picking up sticks on the Sabbath like Moses commanded?
Seth Pawlik that commandment was only for when we are living in the land, under our Righteous King. Thankfully, when the Messiah reigns, sin will be gone, and stoning will not be necessary.
Yes he did. This teaching was not to teach against it rather what Paul meant by two statements by not keeping the Torah (which results in death).
Moises G.V. firstly don't show your stupidity publicly. To others commenting in response please do leave the teaching to the dudes who are qualified to do it. ONE for Israel demonstrates that knowledge and you don't.
Raymond Quinton brother what kind of spirit is that? People go to seminary and schooling for decades and still disagree. How can you rebuke someone for disagreeing? Paul Peter and james literally disagreed with each other. It was through conversation that they all came to harmony and the New Testament became what it did. The Holy Spirit was sent for what? For us to blindly trust what large organized religious companies tell us? Come on man. You know better. The Holy Spirit is so we wouldn’t have to trust greedy rabbis or misinformed priests but rather take it up with God directly.
Law is only a mirror of a sinner and demanding u to die but Jesus offering blood to forgive u..
Perfect!
Not only that, but the ten commandments they agreed to obey, were also broken at the foot of the mountain by the making of a golden calf; just days later
Funny thing. I find everything Paul says about the torah comes right out of the torah. For example, when he says the power of sin is in the law.... Sin being equated with death in the previous verse.... Go look up the words life and death inn the torah... This is why I'm not convinced Paul is talking about 2 laws when he mentions the law of life In Christ, and the law lif soon and death is really 2 laws, but two sizes of the same law, opposing eachother.
God says when you breakthroughs law, ie sin, you inherit death, and vice versa with life and obedience. I believe this is in deuteronomy 30.
Deuteronomy 28, right?
Paul was the messenger of satan. Basically his teaching is opposite to Torah and it's funny you came to the conclusion that "everything Paul says about the torah comes right out of the torah"
emanuel e you are baring false witness against brother Paul, he was chosen by God the Father and the Lord Yeshua HaMoshiach.
@@emanuele6314 Paul was put on trial in Acts for what you are accusing him of and he denied it. He even took a Nazarite vow to try to prove it.
So yeah, you are lying against Paul just like people have been doing for 2000 years.
I am trying to understand Romans. Please pray for me for knowledge.
Paul explains that God's standard has always been faith. The Law was put in place as a "schoolmaster" or "tutor" to make God's moral standards and the people's inability to meet those standards, evident. The Law proved the necessity of Faith and Grace. Now that the lesson has been taught, running back to the schoolhouse is not only silly, it goes against God's very purposes.
So basically. The Law was ADDED, UNTIL.
One problem the law exists before Moses
@@johnraymond1861 ,
In what sense?
@@jameswoodard4304 If you read genesis all the sins that happen are breaking one or more of the 10 commandments even Sabbath day started the week of creation Cain murder of Able. Adam & Eve eating the fruit broke at least 3 commandments
@@johnraymond1861 ,
You are just showing that the *sins* proscribed by the Law existed before the Law. I am not arguing that theft didn't exist before Moses. I am arguing that a specific commandment from God based on a specific historical covenant didn't exist before Moses.
When we are speaking of "the Law" here in a discussion of Paul's position, we are referring to the Jewish Torah delivered to Moses .The term "the law of God" could, of course, be used to talk about His eternal standard of righteousness, or other such broad uses. However, we are talking here about "The Law" which in the parlance of Paul's epistles, refers to the Law of Moses.
In Galatians 3:17, Paul is talking about the relationship of faith and "the law." In this verse, he states as part of his argument that "the law came 430 years after" the covenant God made with Abraham. Obviously, the righteous standard of God, as well as the sins of those who failed to meet the standard, existed during the time of Abraham and before. But the Law, as Paul is discussing it and as I intended in my comment, did not come about until Moses.
Thank you ,i needed that ,pls pray for peace of israel ,palestine and kushtite immigrants , and may the lord good news overcome the assyrian regime like it did to the romans in yeshuas name the lion of judah ,amen
I saw it as God preparing Israel as a nation under Him. Israel was still a nomadic tribe then, there are archaeological findings of a nomadic tribe being called the people of YHWH. He was, in my opinion, trying to establish Israel so that they could minister and subdue their pagan neighbors which He did achieve later on, except it took a longer route because of all the detours they made. God's really graceful, He was accompanying them throughout but in their fear and sin, they just treated Him without reverence because they became too comfortable with Him and regarded more as a wish granter than God.
The word is Spiritually discerned
"...BREAKIN' The Law Breakin' The Law Breakin' The Law..." - Judas Priest.
In the same way... If we don't believe in Yeshua we can not enter the kingdom of God.
💖🙏💖
The following is why people misunderstand Paul.
The background to the “lawless” debate is found in Acts ch.15. The early converts were mainly Jews and they misunderstood what was required of a Christian. This issue was widespread and continued for some time with devout Jewish converts insisting gentile converts keep the “law of Moses.”
Galatians ch.3 is the scripture generally used to claim that the apostle Paul taught that Christians were not under the law.
Gal.ch.3:2-3 - “Received you the Spirit by the works of the law or by the hearing of faith? Are you so foolish? Having begun in the Spirit are ye now made perfect in the law?” - v.10 “For as many as are of the works of the law are under the curse: - -”
vs.11-13 “But that no man is justified by the law in the sight of God, the just shall live by faith.” - - “And the law is not of faith:” - “Christ has redeemed us from the curse of the law, being made a curse for us; for it is written, cursed is everyone that hangs on a tree.”- - v19 “Wherefore then serve the law? It was added because of transgressions till the seed should come to whom the promise was made. - - -”
v24. “Wherefore the law was our schoolmaster to bring us to Christ that we might be justified by faith - v25 “But after faith is come we are no longer under a schoolmaster.”
So there you have it. The law was only a temporary expedient, “a schoolmaster to bring us to Christ” but now that Christ has come we can dispense with the law, it is replaced by faith in Christ. At a superficial reading that is how it would appear.
But we overlooked something - v19 - the law “ WAS ADDED BECAUSE OF TRANSGRESSIONS”
Romans ch.4:15 - “Where there is no law there is no transgression” So there had to be a law in existence before it could be broken and because that pre-existing law was broken the law that is the subject of Galatians ch.3 “was added”
What then is this law that was added - Jeremiah ch.7:22 - “For I spoke not unto your fathers nor commanded them in the day that I brought them out of the land of Egypt concerning burned offering and sacrifice.” And In Isaiah ch.1 God berates Judah for their sins and in v11 He asks - “To what purpose is the multitude of your sacrifices unto me? Saith the Lord. I am full of the burned offerings of rams and the fat of fed beasts, and I delight not in the blood of bullocks or of lambs or of he goats - and He continues with - new moons, appointed feasts, prayers etc. and says He is “weary to hear them” And why? - because their “hands are full of blood” vs 15. And in verses 16-17 admonishes them to change their ways. The Jews were attempting to demonstrate their righteousness by zealously keeping the “law that was added” while at the same time demonstrating their unrighteousness by neglecting to keep the original law - to love their neighbours as themselves. See also Hebrews ch.10:1-8
The law that was abolished is the ritual law, the law of sacrifice etc. that was added because they had broken the moral law
Is Paul opposed to the moral law? Galatians ch.5:14 “For all the law is fulfilled in this one word - thou shall love thy neighbour as yourself.” Ephesians ch.4:28 - “Let him who stole steal no more.” “-- -, for he that loves another has fulfilled the law. For this, Thou shall not commit adultery, Thou shalt not kill, thou shalt not steal, Thou shalt not bear false witness, Thou shalt not covet, and if there is any other commandment it is briefly comprehended in this saying, Thou shalt love they neighbour as yourself. Love works no ill to his neighbour therefore love is the fulfilling of the law (Romans ch.13:8-10)
It is this "law that was added" that Jesus came to fulfil. Matthew 5:17-20 KJV
2:01 Jews complaining? I’ve never heard of this...
Amen. The law was given intended to address the sinful behavior of man. But sin was slaving us man and we are hopeless, even though we know that it is wrong and there are consequences we powerless of the sin that is in us. Because He is JUSTICE He need to punish us for our sin, that what paul ment That that instead of righteousness it bring death to us. But because of Christ He gave us righteousness thats the Law did not gave us. Instead we fulfill the Law by believing on Him and our sinful desire addresses not by followingthe Law. But by faith, love, and Grace that He showed us.
More appropriate qiestion would be was Peter right about the Torah.
Thank you, thank you, THANK YOU for not being the next Messianic organization to assert that gentiles are under the Hebrew covenant and Mosaic law.
There have been so many youtube channels that i have enjoyed very much, only to find that they insist on gentiles (the vast bulk of believers) following the law. That Acts 15 didn't ACTUALLY mean what it said, and that Paul has been misinterpreted by believers who wish to live their lives in sin.
May your ministry continue to be blessed by the Most High God!
The music is killing me
What did it mean when Jesus healed & worked on the Sabbath if we are to keep the law?
To make a long story short, I would say Jesus healed and worked on the sabbath because for one he is “Lord of the Sabbath “therefore he has the right. Secondly I would say that he wanted to teach that man was not made for the law but rather the law was made for man .Jesus even once asked should someone do good or bad on the sabbath, and he was saddened at the cold hearts because they will not answer. So that proves that they were hypocrites and we’re only keeping the law to impress others rather than keeping the law for the right reasons.
He did not say we are to keep the law.
@@jameswoodard4304 who ?
@@urbanbluecollar7813 ,
The presenter in the video never said or argued that we are to keep the law. The original commenter, patty stordahl, seems to be challenging an assertion the video itself never made. I was replying to patty's comment to point that out.
@@jameswoodard4304 I don’t think patty was referring to the video but it was a question in general
Ephesians 2:8
Shalom. You should be quoting from the 1611 King James Bible only. See Gail Riplinger’s work on this. She
Is on Utube and is the author of “New Age Bible Versions.”
All teaching of the law should always include, so there is no misunderstanding, the necessity to keep the 10 commandments. This includes the 4th commandment the keeping of the 7th day sabbath.
I think we have to consider the possibility that the works Paul is referring to are those good works ( keeping the commandments and feasts and the laws of Moses ) done by the Jews prior to conversion. And that he is addressing this topic primarily for the sake of the Gentiles who were without these good works prior to their conversion.
The point that he could be making is this. This could be an attempt by Paul to address the effects of the inferiority that the gentiles converts would have experienced, who unlike the Jews had no knowledge of God prior to their conversion.
This is an inferiority that todays gentile believers would experience if the Jews had found Christ before they found Him.
But because todays gentiles have come to a knowledge of the truth before the Jews did, the gentle converts are not affected by their inferiority to the Jewish believers Godly heritage.
But those Gentile converts that Paul knew, would have certainly been affected by it.
However Paul try’s to diminish this by saying that AS the Jew’s works of keeping the commandments along with all the laws of Moses, it nevertheless didn’t contribute to their salvation,
Therefore he is allowing the Gentiles to come to the conclusion that there is actually such an equality between Jew and Gentle believers, because God chose them both of them, and not on account of works, so therefore the gentile converts should be confident in the knowledge that they must be equal to one another because God chose them equally and not on the basis of works.
Paul, as Saul, had witnessed first hand the double standards of the rabbis. He knew they were manipulating the laws of Almighty God, Yhwh, just as many government leaders do today which is make every one the servants of those laws but they themselves excused themselves from following those laws in their hearts, but followed them in the style of image-craft which is pretending to follow God's laws just enough ro convince the .people. Vicars and priests also do it which is why the faith in Yhwh/Jehovah is collapsing around our ears just when we need it most...but I suspect this will all change when Wormwood and Satan make their presence felt which they already are.
Let us hear the conclusion of the whole matter: Fear God and keep His commandments, For this is man’s all. For God will bring every work into judgment, Including every secret thing, Whether good or evil.
Ecclesiastes 12:13-14
Therefore, having these promises, beloved, let us cleanse ourselves from all filthiness of the flesh and spirit, perfecting holiness in the fear of God.
2 Corinthians 7:1
Circumcision is nothing and uncircumcision is nothing, but keeping the commandments of God is what matters.
1 Corinthians 7:19
Ecclesiastes is a very bad place to get your doctrine from. It repeats UNDER THE SUN, over and over again and the expression occurs 29 times in 12 chapters. This is a man trying to figure things out about life and God by himself, and with no divine knowledge. Solomon was trying to find the words of truth instead of the words of God, and in his life, he made a mess of it.
What about the two verses BEFORE 1 Cor. 7:19? But as God hath distributed to every man, as the Lord hath called everyone, so let him walk. And so I ordain in all churches. Is any man called being circumcised? Let him not become uncircumcised. Is any man called uncircumcised [GENTILES] let him not be circumcised.
For by grace are ye saved through faith and that not of yourselves, It is the gift of God and not of works lest any man should boast (Eph. 2:8.9)
Paul said that a believer was justified 'from ALL things' that he could not be justified BY THE LAW OF MOSES (Acts 13:39,40).
Peter said: “Now therefore why tempt ye God to put a yoke upon the neck of the disciples, which neither our fathers or we [JEWS] were able to bear? But we believe that through the grace of our Lord Jesus Christ we shall be saved even as they `` (Acts 15:10,11).
"Knowing that a man is not justified by the works of the law, but by the faith of Jesus Christ, even we [JEWS] have believed in Jesus Christ, that we might be justified by the faith of Christ, and not by the works of the law: for by the works of the law shall no flesh be justified." (Gal. 2:16)
"Therefore by the deeds of the law there shall no flesh be justified in his sight: for by the law is the knowledge of sin." Romans 3:20,
@@kjvnews8326 How be faithful to Jesus Christ? You obey his law. We need more than belief in a name as Jesus says the demons believe and tremble!
Oh what else is needed?
The demons don’t BELIEVE in Jesus Christ as Lord and Savior, scripture says they believe there is one God...
James 2:19 Thou believest that there is one God; thou doest well. The devils also believe - and tremble.
@@kerryscott690 WOW! Why do you not know the scripture? Yahshua would shut demons up because they know who he was! In Mathew 8:31 they begged him to send them into pigs. They knew YAHSHUA is God but he did not want that revealed yet? Please do what Jesus says before read Paul or anyone else Jesus say to love him is to keep the commandments(OT says same word with God) or he says not anyone who says Lord lord ...Mathew 7:21-22 please compare Paul to both Jesus and God's. Even when Paul quotes OT it seems he gets it a little wrong? Jesus is our savior but we listen to Paul? That does not make sense to me any more! I want to listen and obey my savior
@@johnraymond1861 Paul speaks EXACTLY what God says! Paul is inspired by The Holy Spirit and was CHOSEN by Jesus..
It’s interesting when scripture says something differently than YOU, you say Paul is in error lol!! It is YOU that is in error not Paul!
You don’t keep the commandments, you are only deceiving yourself if you really think you do. I know you have broken commandments and are a sinner just like all of mankind..
You never answered my question. What else besides believing is required for salvation?
It's like this:
the parent warns kids: Don't do drug.
Perverse kid: what? There's something called "drug"? I'll use it.
Your background music is very distracting from what you are saying. And doesn’t seem at all to go. Sounds like it belongs in a Guy Ritchie Sherlock Holmes movie.
ONCE JEWS ACCEPT "YESHUA"as their own messiah.they will be thy leaders of all over the world.its what i have been dreamed
Paul writing is about grace and law...
I find it hard to believe that Moses didn't have faith. This means that he is not in heaven. I can't disagree with you about his restrictions about enter the promise land but to say that all who entered had faith but Moses did not ... I don't buy it.
Please do not use music
Paul was wrong about claiming he was the apostle to the Gentiles (Heathens) and Peter was to go to the circumcised.
This is against Jesus instructions and Jesus foretelling of what would take place with his disicples.
Christ's life begins with keeping the law and goes in reverse from Moses to Adam.
This was written by the Holy Spirit, God Breathed
I disagree with his stance on the law. The law is good and doesn't create wrath or sin. Saying without the law there would be no transgressions is like saying if murder wasn't a law it wouldnt be fine.
"The law is not of faith."
- Galatians 3
Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye pay tithe of mint and anise and cummin, and have omitted the weightier matters of the law: judgment and mercy and faith.
Mat23 >
"The law is not of faith."
- Galatians 3
The messiah's name was always going to be Jesus according to Zechariah Chapter 6... which is the same name as the post exile high priest ,Yeshua!
if the concept of Messiah and God are separate then it doesn't automatically follow that sins can be forgiven.. only God can forgive sins. furthermore if the expectation of Messiah is to reverse the events of Genesis 3 Genesis 6 and Genesis 11 then by Definition messiah has to be more than just a man.
Jesus being born of Mary but not of Joseph is not a problem according to Jewish history because I believe during the reign of Queen Alexandra Jewish law made Heritage pass on, by matrilineal Bases.
A basis for the Trinity can be established in the Old Testament by passages like Amos 4:11Isaiah 48:16.. and Judges chapter 2:1 and Daniel 7:9-14
Support for the idea of God becoming man in Scripture are Deuteronomy 18 verses 15 to 18 Focus of the verse speaks of the coming Messiah coming from lineage of Israel like unto moses.
We also have Exodus chapter 23 verse 20 and 21 the context of which is speaking about the future Endeavor of going over Jordan then we come to Joshua chapter 5 verses 13 to 15 and the context of this passage is having just gone over the Jordan into Israel.
Another proof of this idea perhaps most glaringly Jeremiah chapter 1 verses 4-10... the first thing you want to pay attention to is titles in verse 4 and verse 9... Hashem and the word of the Lord these titles are used interchangeably there's some definite implication there but the point of emphasis here is verse 9 because it goes a little further than just anthropomorphic language.
Now the next concern is did Jesus ever claim to be God? And for this the scriptures I would provide are Matthew 26:64 Jesus directly quotes Daniel 7:13
John 10:34 Jesus claims to be the judge in Psalm 82 referencing verse 6
In John 10 versus Both 11 and 14 Jesus Yeshua says that he is the Good Shepherd and you can cross-reference this with the very first line of Psalm 23.
In Mark chapter 6 starting from verse 45 Jesus walks on the water this is something designated in the Old Testament for something only God (job 9:8) can do this separates Jesus from the other people who did miracles.
Where another claim would be is in the fact that Jesus forgives sins, off the top of my head is Mark chapter 2
now certainly there have always been Messianic claimants but none of them have ever claimed to forgive sins.
Now the question becomes why would Jesus so secretive why didn't he just come out and say that he was the Lord God of Israel?... well one scripture off the top of my head of that I would provide here that might be interesting is this Matthew 16:20 "then he commanded his disciples that they should tell no one that he was Jesus the Christ"... my suggestion to you here, would be that the crucifixion how to take place at a certain place at a certain time and under a specific set of circumstances.
Please Look into all the scriptures I made mention here I hope this helps even one person
Hashem bless everyone of you... in the name of Jesus both son and God of David king of Israel, amen!
You can always choose to deny the Law and the Prophets and justify your pride at your own perile.
Jesus is the only way to heaven. Humble your self and ask Jesus he will answer you
Saul was under the law of Moses, but like all Pharisees he did not keep it, but he found he should be under the law of Abraham. I have Ytube videos 'Myths in so-called Christianity'.
You got it wrong
@@BibliayFe Read Romans 4 until you understand what Saul now understood as Paul. The law or Torah of Abraham was to keep God's law by faith, Jesus did, and the amendment to the law given to Moses still had the requirement of faith, as Deuteronomy 30.
@@simonskinner1450 nobody kept the law
@@BibliayFe Thousands kept the law of Abraham by faith, it is a myth in Christianity that no one keeps the law.
I have a few videos in my Ytube video series 'Myths in so-called Christianity' that expose such Myths.
Moses introduced the 10 Commandments as a global set of laws to replace the set of laws that was in place in Ge:6 when God judged the world to be in sin. The 'sons of God' in Ge:6 are angels and angels have been alive since the beginning of day1 of creation, the law for immortal beings is the Re:21 set of laws. The grief God felt was over what was being done to the children of Adam and Eve, all of whom had 5 fingers on each hand. The children of the fallen angels all had 6 fingers. When the flood came there were five 5-fingered people left alive, Noah and his wife and 3 sons. If God had killed the sons wives there would have been no 6-fingered people left alive and that was needed as they were related to the fallen angels so they were how the Re:21 law was in effect until the last 6-fingered person died in the exodus wars. That law was centered around the same altar from the Garden that Cain/Abel brought their offerings to.
Israel was a slice of the garden and the Ezekiel version will be the land that will be called Israel starting with the 1,000 year reign. Since Jesus is immortal and the whole population alive at the end of the 1st day of the 1,000 year reign and they are all witnesses to all fallen angels being sent to the fiery lake that makes them immortal as well that means the law of the land reverts back to what it was between Adam and Moses, that is the Re:21 set of laws.
Blood offerings are for the forgiveness of sins, Jesus died as the last blood sacrifice, any offering after that should have been Cain's offering as it is thanking God for the food He provides for people that need food. In the 1,000 year reign there will be no other flesh alive so a return to blood offerings will be impossible. The rain that falls on the Nations will be why Cain's offering will be possible. That will also be the only offering made all through the time the new earth exists.
If the area of Israel was valid for the time of Jesus the people in Samaria would not have been viewed as outcasts. Judea is a lot smaller than Israel and because of sin God removed the Jews from the land by using Neb from Babylon. The Jews in Matt:23 were not gathered like the 11 that Jesus baptized the evening after His resurrection, they are not gathered until the Re:20:4 resurrections take place which is a fulfillment of Eze:37 and the resurrection of the 12 Tribes that goes back to Joseph, the son of Abraham. Abraham with be wandering the world with the Gentile Church. That would seem to include Adam and Eve as well and all the people God will resurrect so they are not in the grave for the 1,000 year reign.
Job is expecting to be resurrected after all of God's wrath is past. Job is not resurrected until after the 7 vials are poured out as the Re:20:4 resurrections is the event that follows that. Job will get to witness Satan and the fallen angels being sent to the fiery lake.
When New Jerusalem land a square that is 1600km on each side will be covered and the rest of the earth will be a sea of glass that is where people will assembly when they come for the various festivals that will exist. The lad that will become the Nations are different solar system that will use names of nations mentioned in the Bible.
Moses died at the age of 120 because of the 120 year determination in Ge:6, in Isa:65 that age is when people will go from being mortal (needing food) to being immortal (able to travel between stars with no support of any kind needed.
The 'latter days' from De:4:30 prophecy is covering the time the two witnesses are in Jerusalem (1st trump sounding) which ends 4 days before the return of Jesus. Prayers are how people repent their sins, once the trumps start sounding the letters in the NT that are for 'the time of the Gentiles (as in Luke:21:24 and the 42 months from Re:11)
Prayers during the trumps are about physical safety that mirror the protection given to the 144,000 and the two witnesses.
Romans:13 is for the believers who promote the doubting Thomas story is fact and not fiction. The selection below is for when Satan and the Beast are waging war against the two witnesses (they alone fight for Jesus). (42 months starting when the 5th trump sounds and ending the day Jesus resurrects the two witnesses so the total time is 4 days for the first 4 trumps and then 3 1/2 years)
Moses was not supposed to enter Israel, be that because of the sin of taking credit for betting water from a rock or because he was the first person (after Cain) to be subject to the 120 year time limit for how long people live before being judged by God to see if they qualify for immortality. Adam died 70 years before he would have been judged to be a sinner and he would have gone to the fiery lake. God kept Moses out of the promised land because when he is there it will be forever rather than 40 years.
The 12 Tribes wandered the desert for 40 years and they balked at their first task, go to war against the 6 fingered people known as 'giants'. God killed every male over the age of 20 years. 40 years later they went to war where they ended up being witnesses to God killing the people in most cases.
When female children were taken those children ended up being married into one of the 12 Tribes as a non-virgin bride rather than a virgin in an arranged marriage. In the resurrection the families of those children are resurrected as part of the 12 tribes as compensation by God to those children.
1Pe:4:12-17:
Beloved,
think it not strange concerning the fiery trial which is to try you,
as though some strange thing happened unto you:
But rejoice,
inasmuch as ye are partakers of Christ's sufferings;
that, when his glory shall be revealed,
ye may be glad also with exceeding joy.
If ye be reproached for the name of Christ,
happy are ye;
for the spirit of glory and of God resteth upon you:
on their part he is evil spoken of,
but on your part he is glorified.
But let none of you suffer as a murderer,
or as a thief,
or as an evildoer,
or as a busybody in other men's matters.
Yet if any man suffer as a Christian,
let him not be ashamed;
but let him glorify God on this behalf.
For the time is come that judgment must begin at the house of God:
and if it first begin at us,
what shall the end be of them that obey not the gospel of God?
And if the righteous scarcely be saved,
where shall the ungodly and the sinner appear?
Wherefore let them that suffer according to the will of God commit the keeping of their souls to him in well doing,
as unto a faithful Creator.
De:4:29-30:
But if from thence thou shalt seek the LORD thy God,
thou shalt find him,
if thou seek him with all thy heart and with all thy soul.
When thou art in tribulation,
and all these things are come upon thee,
even in the latter days,
if thou turn to the LORD thy God,
and shalt be obedient unto his voice;
(For the LORD thy God is a merciful God;)
he will not forsake thee,
neither destroy thee,
nor forget the covenant of thy fathers which he sware unto them.
Ge:6:3:
And the LORD said,
My spirit shall not always strive with man,
for that he also is flesh:
yet his days shall be an hundred and twenty years.
De:34:7:
And Moses was an hundred and twenty years old when he died:
his eye was not dim,
nor his natural force abated.
Ge:1:29:
And God said,
Behold,
I have given you every herb bearing seed,
which is upon the face of all the earth,
and every tree,
in the which is the fruit of a tree yielding seed;
to you it shall be for meat.
People born in the new earth era (only to the people that make their homes outside of the walls of new Jerusalem as the 12 Tribes and Gentile Church from the 1,000 year reign live inside that huge city). That means the people below are the ones being punished in the verses just before this. What is missing is Hebrews:12 as that is when God ends their punishment at the GWT event. The ones called 'the rest' will be given in marriage so they are the ones having children and taking care of the other flesh that Adam and Eve were given dominion over.
0-20 years = infant
20-120 years = child (of God) married like Adam and Eve were, also needing food like they were
120- eternity = 'old man' Jesus with white hair is an 'old man; which means you live to the end of eternity as 120 is when you no longer need food, you no longer have children as you need to learn a lot before you are as wise as the 'sons of God' in Ge:6. People become 'sons of God' after they have drank from the living water and eaten from the tree of life. (Eze:47 for the 1,000 year group and New Jerusalem in Re:21 for 'the rest' of the children of Adam and Eve. New Jerusalem is what 'holy mountain' is reverencing. The Re:21 set of laws come as part of that city.
Isa:65:17-25:
For,
behold,
I create new heavens and a new earth:
and the former shall not be remembered,
nor come into mind.
But be ye glad and rejoice for ever in that which I create:
for,
behold,
I create Jerusalem a rejoicing,
and her people a joy.
And I will rejoice in Jerusalem,
and joy in my people:
and the voice of weeping shall be no more heard in her,
nor the voice of crying.
There shall be no more thence an infant of days,
nor an old man that hath not filled his days:
for the child shall die an hundred years old;
but the sinner being an hundred years old shall be accursed.
And they shall build houses,
and inhabit them;
and they shall plant vineyards,
and eat the fruit of them.
They shall not build,
and another inhabit;
they shall not plant,
and another eat:
for as the days of a tree are the days of my people,
and mine elect shall long enjoy the work of their hands.
They shall not labour in vain,
nor bring forth for trouble;
for they are the seed of the blessed of the LORD,
and their offspring with them.
And it shall come to pass,
that before they call,
I will answer;
and while they are yet speaking,
I will hear.
The wolf and the lamb shall feed together,
and the lion shall eat straw like the bullock:
and dust shall be the serpent's meat.
They shall not hurt nor destroy in all my holy mountain,
saith the LORD.
The 10 Commandments are the law that was brought forward, Acts:10 was 3 1/2 years after the cross and it marked the end of the 70th week of Da:9. The law used against Jesus was from the 613 laws and the removal of the diet restriction meant all 613 were no longer a sin requiring the person be killed if a blood sacrifice could not be made in a temple in Jerusalem. Gentiles are taught the 10 Commandments but not the other laws. If a Jew rejects the NT then he rejects the ability to repent the sin of eating Gentile food through the same kind of prayer Daniel was saying in his role as a High Priest to God while in exile from the Temple in Jerusalem. A Priest can call his whole flock 'his children' and Paul and the beloved Disciple did just that.
Jas:2:7-17:
Do not they blaspheme that worthy name by the which ye are called?
If ye fulfil the royal law according to the scripture,
Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself,
ye do well:
But if ye have respect to persons,
ye commit sin,
and are convinced of the law as transgressors.
For whosoever shall keep the whole law,
and yet offend in one point,
he is guilty of all.
For he that said,
Do not commit adultery,
said also,
Do not kill.
Now if thou commit no adultery,
yet if thou kill,
thou art become a transgressor of the law.
So speak ye,
and so do,
as they that shall be judged by the law of liberty.
For he shall have judgment without mercy,
that hath shewed no mercy;
and mercy rejoiceth against judgment.
What doth it profit,
my brethren,
though a man say he hath faith,
and have not works?
can faith save him?
If a brother or sister be naked,
and destitute of daily food,
And one of you say unto them,
Depart in peace,
be ye warmed and filled;
notwithstanding ye give them not those things which are needful to the body;
what doth it profit?
Even so faith,
if it hath not works,
is dead,
being alone.
From Moses to the return is the time in which both bruises from Ge:3:15 are fulfilled, The bruise to the heel was completed in full when Jesus said, 'It is finished,' just before he died, the bruise to Satan's head will be completed in full when Jesus says, 'It is done.' as He pours out the 7th vial.
From Adam to Joseph, the son of Abraham, was a period that was setting up things so a group could be made that would give birth to the person who would become the 'seed of Eve'. (5 fingered like Noah was)
Galatians 2 : 21.
Paul was a pharisee, the pharisees believed there were two laws given at mt. sinai, the written Torah and the oral torah. The written Torah is what we know as the five books of Moses, the oral torah is what we know as the talmud also described in the new testament as "the traditions of the fathers" something our lord was opposed to and outspoken about. You must carefully discern when dividing the words of Paul, exactly what "law" he's talking about. Remember the warning of Peter in 2Peter 3:15-16, he was writing to the galatians as we find in 1Peter. According to Peter the book of galatians is hard to understand by people who don't know the law, and for that fault may distort the complex words of Paul to their own spiritual destruction!
Let me ask all of you one simple question...when reading Paul's letter to the galatians, what one thing could be misunderstood that would cause a person to possibly ultimately loose their salvation? Allow me to eliminate one possibility I think we all can agree on...faith in Jesus, what's the one book people refer to when trying to prove we don't need to keep God's Torah any longer?
Galatians.
How can you prove that he's refering to the "oral law" and not to the written law in the given cases?
Personally, I haven't found any to verily affirm he's talking about oral law and not the only true law given to israel (written law).
Christian cannot lose salvation, we are sealed from the moment we believe on Jesus
@@standaman378 Matthew 7 21-23.
21 “Not everyone who says to me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ will enter the kingdom of heaven, but the one who does the will of my Father who is in heaven. 22 On that day many will say to me, ‘Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in your name, and cast out demons in your name, and do many mighty works in your name?’ 23 And then will I declare to them, ‘I never knew you; depart from me, you workers of lawlessness.’
@@jonathanhouser8194 You fail to read and understand that Jesus says, "I NEVER knew you." The people Jesus is telling to depart from Him, were never Christians.
@@carljones8334 False. "Never knew you" = They weren't His to begin with. A lot of people never kept His Commandments from the start. Not doing so means they don't know Him and they're liars (1 John 2:4). James chapter 2 is amazing as well, he clearly states that not keeping the Commandments/Law means void faith (or does not exist).
Still, the Law describes the will of God. Jesus never revoked them. He fulfilled some of them, so there's no more need for any sacrifices, ritual purity, etc.
Exactly!! But it’s not done away with
What was not completed is where there is no law of sacrifice, SIN, there is no TRANSGRESSION. Statutes are stones of condemnation that carry with them the wood framework for judgment. These are both contracts (bondage). The party in breach offers (pays) in sacrifice (detriment) to oneself. Judgment is TRANSGRESSION in that it builds in the pattern of SIN giving it a new name. The wood attached to the stone statutes are referred to as damages. God's of wood and stone. The arch itself wood and stone to which you look for protection. These are idols of worship overlaid with gold and silver, freedom and liberty as these define and program your freedom and liberty as though you were artificial intelligence.
❤️
Anyone who thinks the law is a curse, tell that to father YAH. Tell him he was wrong, then tell him whats right
The law is not a curse.
But the effects of the law to those who break it end in death, unless there is the shedding of blood, which of course results in atonement.
According to the Torah, "all mankind is a sinner". In fact it's in our fallen DNA.
Jesus punishment and death was the Ultima atonement for all sin for all time, to those who believe and trust in him. And that was God's plan all along.
He (GOD) supplied the sacrifices for mankind. Once and for all,!
Bless the name and praise God most High!
I've come believe Paul's the problem
He’s definitely not. Ask God for discernment and understanding
@@daijanlove4688 What makes you think I haven't? Really Check your bible Paul 4 different testimonies acts 9,22,26 Galatians 2. Paul claims apostleship yet acts 1:15-26 says what a true apostle is? God says theirs only 12 in heaven? God said not to eat meat sacrifice to ideals. In 1Corinthians 8 Paul says we can? When I was on a missions trip years ago God told me not to eat food sacrifice to an ideal!
@@johnraymond1861 Hey, can you write the actual verses of these occurrences instead of the chapter so I may fully understand your points, please.
Wrong about the Jewish law? Hmm, is there a Jewish law? I see he calls it the Mosaic law, and calls Paul a Hebrew... Hmmm where did all the Jewishness go?
One thing that a pastor showed me that no one seems to pick up on is that Paul also called the law, namely the 10 Commandments the covenant of death in 2 Cor 3. Moreover, Sinai was the first Pentecost and 3000 died but in acts ch 2 the very first verse says when the day of Pentecost had FULLY come which I believe meant that what was originally intended in the first Pentecost was fulfilled on the day of Pentecost after Jesus resurrection and 3000 were saved and given eternal life.
So, simply spoken the law is the covenant of death while faith through grace is to eternal life.
Problem count how many times God said the commandments lead to LIFE in scripture and Jesus agrees in revelation 22:14
@@johnraymond1861 Problem, you are either under law or grace and no man can keep the law.
Break one law just once and you are under the condemnation of the whole law, which is death.
I many problems with Paul 1 if God said He doesn't change? Their is NO law vs Grace argument! Why anyone can find God's grace in the old testament if they know look Paul says law is death God and Jesus say the law is LIFE. Paul says law is done away? Jesus says I did NOT come to d away with the law not one jot or title Intill all is fulfilled. Side note All cannot be fulfilled till Jesus comes back
Paul in 1Corinthians 8 says we can eat meat sacrificed to idol's? Jesus and the apostles say we can't acts 15 revelation 2
Jesus in Revelation says 12apostles only but Paul calls himself and many others apostles? Read Deuteronomy chapter 13 very CAREFULLY God warned us about people like Paul who has 4 different testimonies of Jesus acts 9 /22 /26 Galatians 2. Jesus also warn about people who saw I'm in the desert Paul said God sent him to the Gentles?? Yet Holy spirit sent Peter to the Gentles acts 10 if you break a law God made it clear! You repent for that sin you are covered by the blood that has never CHANGED the only difference is we now know why Jesus
john raymond ummmm.. can you say heresy?!!🤔
@@johnraymond1861 You have a very deficient view of Scripture if you think what Paul wrote, contradicted anything Jesus said. Scripture was written by men who were moved by the Holy Spirit to write what they did. Do you really think the Holy Spirit and Jesus are at odds with each other?
If you think there is a contradiction between what Paul wrote and what Jesus said, then you have misinterpreted Scripture in it's primary context.
Salvation has always been by grace through faith, from Adam, to Abraham, to Paul and to us.
The way in which God has required His people to walk however has differed. Have you forgotten that there is no mention of eating animals until Noah exited the ark and he could eat with no restrictions, then God gave dietary laws to Moses, but they were never given to Abraham, then God showed Peter that he could eat anything He had created?
John my friend, do not call anything unclean that God has cleansed.
Study the dispensationalist way of interpreting Scripture, if you are not to tie your self up in knots.
Interestingly it appears my comment was removed. I challenge you to a debate on the subject. Its time you were pulled up for misleading people.
Well, as an interested member of a public audience, I will point out that you have a place right here to point out any and every way in which the speaker was lying or being deceptive. If we are being decieved, please don't hesitate to prove your claim here. Otherwise, a random person clamoring for a personal and official debate while giving no evidence of his position is just being silly and unreasonable.
That said, I see from the comments you have left in other places that you tend to spew insults and bad language instead of actual debate, so I'm sure the people at One for Israel have plenty of good reasons not to jump immediately on your demand for a personal debate. Even people who hold an incorrect position are right in refusing to debate those who cannot behave as mature adults, and I don't think OfI are holding a wrong position.
@@jameswoodard4304 I'm sure you have the answers to this and everything else. Sadly in the first place you don't KNOW that. Secondly my so called spewing insults is in my opinion far less a wrong than a twisting of God's words. Under taking people back under the shadows and types instead of forward to the realities in Christ was Paul's own problems with Judaizers. I consider Judaizing people a far worse thing than insulting the people guilty for it. Sadly most people following these groups are not equipped to discern the error, as you are most likely also not, so I would like to bet are not or do you take the challenge on their behalf. I followed and absolutely loved ONE FOR ISRAEL and the work they do until I noticed these tendencies slipping in, which sadly is true of all messianic groups today. I actually thought that they had broken that cycle. So don't open your mouth, or should I say pen before you have all the details.
@@jameswoodard4304 It seems that you have appointed yourself some sort of judge and jury here? Not quite sure who u believe yourself to be, but you're speaking from what platform? But having so appointed yourself let me ask you which is more serious in your eyes, I say that deliberately, is it to insult people, who, knowingly or not, for when you presume to teach you stand under greater condemnation, possibly cost people their eternal salvation, for indeed, that is the seriousness of the matter, or is it to insult them for doing that. Put another way, is it less or more serious to offend God or man?
@@raymondquinton5960 ,
1) Please quote from my replies where I claimed authority or passed any judgment beyond the same ability of stating one's own opinion which you have also reserved for yourself. Did I not open with something like, "as a member of a public audience...?" Was I not inviting you to make your own statements on equal terms and support your own assertions? I read some things you said and gave you my personal opinion on them. I never spoke for anyone else except in the mode of speculation. You are the one demanding that an organization set up a debate with you, who are also just another random YT commenter like myself.
Also, have you not just passed judgment on me by presumptuously declaring to me what I believe based on no evidence whatsoever? The loud, angry, insulting person is usually supposed to be the one pointing put other people's hypocrisies in this kind of situation, not highlighting his own.
2) I see you hold to the "whatever I do is okay If I can claim the other guy is worse" fallacy. I was referring to *your* behavior. What does the teaching of someone else have anything whatsoever to do with that point? Who are we answerable to for our behavior? I have no doubt of your answer. Do you suppose that standing before the LORD concerning some point of behavior, He will accept, "Yeah, but you should see what the other guy was doing?"
There is a difference between boldness and strength in Christ and showing an un-Christian attitude toward our opponents. "Love your enemies." "Correct them in love." "The Fruit of the Spirit is...", I am not going to make uncharitable assumptions about you the way you have done with me. I am giving you the benefit of the doubt that you are aware of these texts of Holy Scripture. How about this selction from the third chapter of James:
13Who is wise and understanding among you? By his good conduct let him show his works in the meekness of wisdom. 14But if you have bitter jealousy and selfish ambition in your hearts, do not boast and be false to the truth. 15This is not the wisdom that comes down from above, but is earthly, unspiritual, demonic. 16For where jealousy and selfish ambition exist, there will be disorder and every vile practice. 17But the wisdom from above is first pure, then peaceable, gentle, open to reason, full of mercy and good fruits, impartial and sincere. 18And a harvest of righteousness is sown in peace by those who make peace."
(By the way, the words translated "bitter jealousy" are essentially "bitter zeal." Are you being bitter in your zeal? Do you suppose your zeal for God excuses un-Christian behavior?)
Even assuming you are correct in you positions, it is possible to be correct but going about things in the wrong spirit. Is that not the point of James also saying that having correct orthodox belief means nothing if it does not produce a change which gives evidence?
3) Please show me where One for Israel has taught Judaizing doctrine. I am unaware of it. I certainly didn't find it in this video which argues *for* the Pauline possition that death and sin come by the law, and so we must have faith rather than trust in law. I have never seen OfI promote the idea that Gentiles ought to follow the Mosaic Law. Please enlighten me if I have missed such a major issue.
Reed sea. 🤦🏻♂️
Gods law is perfect, Jesus took the curse of the law upon Himself so we can be saved, for all have transgressed the law. Until we are glorified and Gods law is written on our hearts we are not perfect, Many “laws “ Paul speaks against are the “traditional laws”. (Man made laws). Ask yourself this: what law is God going to write on our hearts? If you seriously believe God did away with His laws then you’re condoning murder, adultry, lying etc...God forbid.
Tamara Hostler God has not written any law in man’s heart yet. Its future to come in the tribulation...
Then what is the holy spirit to help us with? Obedience to what?
Could it be perfection? God said his law is perfect!
_Yes, indeed there are many problems with Paul. In 2 Cor 3:7 Paul blasphemies (the words of the covenant) the ten commandments._
2 Corinthians 3:7 But if the ministration of death, written and engraven in stones, was glorious, [...] which glory was to be done away:
Actually, that is wrong. He was told directly by the Lord Jesus Christ. After Israel fell, he appeared before Paul to deliver the dispensation of grace for the gentiles. To drive Israel to jealousy. But I digress. He received his information from Jesus directly, including the mysteries hidden in God, and not in scripture.
11 But I make known to you, brethren, that the gospel which was preached by me is not according to man. 12 For I neither received it from man, nor was I taught it, but it came through the revelation of Jesus Christ.
The only one who is faultless is jesus. No one else. So it is possiblie. That everyone here have it fault. Just only read everything what jesus did. In mathew Lucas Johannes Marcus. Because the most people cant even rcognize 1 thing from what jesus is saying in the gospel. Even mozes makes a fault😂 so please i dont understand why everybody is jugde paul like hes jesus or somthing. Stop judging.
How can the law be a curse if Yahshua said the law leads to Life God says so multiple times? Why dose God say keeping my commandments is proof you love him
Why YAHSHUA says he's the Way the Truth the Life. He is the Torah made flesh
Jesus says the demons believe and tremble. We need more then faith in a name? BE FAITHFUL! If I love Yahshua I will keep his commandments. Revelation 22:14 says I will promise Life
You are using quotations of scripture in an attempt to refute quotations of scripture. That implies you are doing something wrong.
I disagree, this is what I grew up on and I now see the err in it, plz look into what I’m sharing.
It’s the renewed covenant. New as in still exists but new like a new moon. Refreshed.
Let me share an example. You are driving down the street and you go through a red light, an officer sees you and pulls you over. He gives you a citation for disobeying the law.
This citation is so high that the only One Who can pay your debt, comes and pays the debt but says He will not go to the tree to die again to pay your debt, now Go and Sin NO MORE!
Do you now have freedom to go through red lights or do you now obey the law? No!
Now you are free from the law or debt of the law. We imitate our Torah keeping Messiah.
Only through Messiah can the law be obeyed through His spirit.
King David had Salvation.
Abraham obeyed and it was counted to him as righteousness.
Nicodemus was supposed to have known what Salvation and to be born again was, before Messiah resurrected.
Messiah told them they erred in the scripture, and didn’t know the scripture, which scriptures were they supposed to have known? The NT was not written yet.
Every law Messiah spoke of to explain came from the TaNaK.
The TaNaK exposes sin so that there is repentance! Praise YaH!
Only through YaHuSHa and Elohims Spirit can we understand His TaNaK/Scripture. 2 Corinthians 3, the veil or scales on their eyes are taken away so that they can see.
1 Corinthians 10, the people in the wilderness rejected Messiah( Angel of the Lord/ King YHWH) not because they couldn’t obey it, it’s because they would not obey it and Messiah was right there with them.
He destroyed the world for disobeying the Law.
He killed Ananias and his wife for breaking the Law especially on a Holy Day.
And in the 1000 year reign they will die immediately for sin from major consequences.
The blood is up to the horses bridle, and He speaks to the 7 gatherings in Revelation 2 and 3 and He is warning for them to repent like He has always done. He never changed.
They are still doing the Holy Days and animal sacrifice in the renewed covenant. It’s only better because He accomplished His spring moeds but He is coming again and it will be even better for His Autumn moeds to be accomplished! And then to Tabernacle with Him forever after judgment day is even better than all that!
He is accomplishing His plan of salvation and marriage covenant to His bride.
May you look into this further without a catholic brainwashing.
Much Shalom and much Ahabah!
Right. its the covenant that saves. Yahshua is the mediator between Yahuah just like Moses was. Moses was on a mountain top and the fire of the bush was appeared. Just like Yahshua was like Moses who had the holy (fire) spirit alongside him. Also the bush on fire represents Jerusalem (in Jesus time) with the holy Spirit.
"Hearken unto me, ye that know righteousness, the people in whose heart is my law; fear ye not the reproach of men, neither be ye afraid of their reviling's" Isaiah 51:7 Shalom.
By speaking of the Jews that came out of Egypt and at Sinai as "they", you exclude yourself. "We" Jews say at Pesach, "we were slaves in Egypt", "He redeemed us", etc. You exclude yourself from the Jewish people as you keep saying, "They". You clearly are standing outside of the Jewish people and judging them, rather than being a part. But you do fit into one group, those who Peter talked about in his letter: those unlearned who misunderstand the teachings of Paul and twist them "to their own distruction". This Peter calls the "spirit of anti-messiah" which is, he says, the "spirit of law-less-ness". You are creating a false "law-less" gospel and then calling the Jewish people "they" - talking about how "they" went wrong - this is the root of Christian anti-semetism.
Nobody here has ever fully read Paul's epistles. And you have been indoctrinated to defend his writings.
Peter defended his writings
@@Endtimer2020 No he did not! Peter only called him a brother. Their is debate if Peter wrote that?
I HAVE and his writings(and I've read and listened to what the messiah said and his 12 apostles) add confusion in some places of texts. "the law is holy and good, and just" but then says "were not under the law but under grace" Obviously not a grace that we should sin against the Most high.
Isaiah said "he shall magnify the law and make it honorable" But parts of pauls writings do not make it honorable. It seems like some of pauls writings are actually saying to keep the law but paul is different in the way he teaches in terms of the law verse the prophets of old.
As it is written " and have NOT kept my law"
"the law of sin and death " is not the law itself...…. its the disobedience of it since Christ is the Torah made flesh and he and the Spirit made it possible to obey.
Jesus is greater than the Law. We are saved because of His Grace not because of the Law. the Law is obsolete cause its useless and weak said in the Book of Hebrews
Jesus can not be greater than the law because he is the Torah made flesh
Yahshua/Jesus is the law and the sword that will punish you if you disobey what God says. As it is written "he hath made my mouth as a sharp sword" and also "He that that hath the Sharp Sword with two edges" He kept the law and told others to do so by the heart.
"Whosoever therefore shall break one of these least commandments, and shall teach men so, he shall be called the least in the kingdom of heaven: but whosoever shall do and teach them, the same shall be called great in the kingdom of heaven. For I say unto you, That except your righteousness shall exceed the righteousness of the scribes and Pharisees, ye shall in no case enter into the kingdom of heaven". He was doing the commands already because he did his Fathers commands and then was able to teach others to do the same thing. Yeshuah came to bring a new covenant that would save his people from death and hell. And a remnant was saved.
Absolute lies! Very simple principal: if a child is naughty and don't listen it does not mean now the structure at home falls away and will now only apply to other children. The law stays as the father runs his home and the child must fall back in and follow suit. Our creator has given to us Jews his Torah and it can never become redundant. Hashem, like the father, cannot change. His law is eternal and as Jews we accept it with joy and we live both the oral and written Torah wholeheartedly and realise that our actions has consequences. We do mitzvot not because of fear but out of love and respect for the ribono shel olam, the creator of the world!!!
Paul is a later creation of a Greek pagan mind.
Who introduces Paul? Peter in Acts.
Who did Jesus identify as Satan? Peter
The word Satan means opposer, or one who opposes EEYAH.
The greatest moment of EEYAH’s energy resting upon any man, Jesus, and it was silent. A descending dove makes no noise. In Acts we have the opposite, a noisome fiery tongue of flame. Was the writer trying to give his work more weight or authority to the reader by presenting fanciful miraculous events?
The mans name isn’t Peter. His name is Simon of Petros. Petros is a place, the heart of all Middle East trading from the Silk Road. During Jesus day it was a world hub of Wealth and influence.
There was more than one Simon, and there were no surnames so place names made it the way to differentiate between multiple Simons.
For Greeks, Petros or the Latin form Petr, is a name of the false god Jupiter, Yoweh Petr.