I did a lot of flow testing with a clone CHT nozzle. It had one of the flatter top copper slugs, so I chamfered the entry to look more like this Trianglelab nozzle or a genuine CHT. I was able to get up to 30mm³/s with some PLA and with only 5% under extrusion. This is on an Ender 3 Pro with a bimetal heatbreak and a Sprite SE extruder. So with a slightly better heater I'm sure it could go even further.
Thanks for your comment. I bought also one of the cheap CHts on Ali (like 2$) - hardened steel with a copper 3-hole core. I haven't tested it yet - I am a bit afraid cause I ordered 0.8 nozzle, it is written 0.8 on the nozzle, but the hole is not more than 0.4. The Trianglelab one is quality. Today I had another print with large solid infill and I got nice infill at 30mm3/s (V6, 40W heater, titanium heatbreak from trianglelab - so basic). I made a video and will link it soon in the video description..
@@3dpblog That's strange! The set I ordered had 0.2, 0.4, and 0.8 nozzles and the holes definitely seem appropriately sized. My flow results were insane with the 0.8 nozzle after chamfering the entry. Trianglelab is def higher quality! That's great results.
I suppose i've got a nozzle from a bad batch. will get another one to test it. I linked a short video in the video description for the flow of the TL nozzle. I get good infill at 30 mm/s with ASA, which is great for a V6, PLA could be even more.
@@3dpblog Wow 30mm³/s with ASA is excellent! Can likely do a lot more with PLA like you said. When I tested PETG vs PLA the maximum flow with minimal under extrusion was drastically different.
I did a lot of flow testing with a clone CHT nozzle. It had one of the flatter top copper slugs, so I chamfered the entry to look more like this Trianglelab nozzle or a genuine CHT. I was able to get up to 30mm³/s with some PLA and with only 5% under extrusion. This is on an Ender 3 Pro with a bimetal heatbreak and a Sprite SE extruder. So with a slightly better heater I'm sure it could go even further.
Thanks for your comment. I bought also one of the cheap CHts on Ali (like 2$) - hardened steel with a copper 3-hole core. I haven't tested it yet - I am a bit afraid cause I ordered 0.8 nozzle, it is written 0.8 on the nozzle, but the hole is not more than 0.4. The Trianglelab one is quality.
Today I had another print with large solid infill and I got nice infill at 30mm3/s (V6, 40W heater, titanium heatbreak from trianglelab - so basic). I made a video and will link it soon in the video description..
@@3dpblog That's strange! The set I ordered had 0.2, 0.4, and 0.8 nozzles and the holes definitely seem appropriately sized. My flow results were insane with the 0.8 nozzle after chamfering the entry. Trianglelab is def higher quality! That's great results.
I suppose i've got a nozzle from a bad batch. will get another one to test it. I linked a short video in the video description for the flow of the TL nozzle. I get good infill at 30 mm/s with ASA, which is great for a V6, PLA could be even more.
@@3dpblog Wow 30mm³/s with ASA is excellent! Can likely do a lot more with PLA like you said. When I tested PETG vs PLA the maximum flow with minimal under extrusion was drastically different.
HI there, which is the version have you bought? the 0.4mm or 0.6mm version. Thanks!