2001 Volvo C70 Convertible Review

Rob Hallam reviews the 2001 Volvo C70 Convertible and compares it to some of it's competitors, testing it on it's performance and handling, as well as practicality and comfort.

[@eddietiller3162]

Underrated Car

[@lizbabytweet]

"More flex than a yoga instructor"😂

[@OzBloke]

Really enjoying mine.

[@wisemanhomeschool7913]

Great video! love the , cheese,potato and pepper anology 😊!

[@Digitalpiracy]

looks like Dorset?
Good film. Was already considering buying one of these as its hard to find convertibles that aren't 'hair-dressery' but this one completely avoids that look

[@ashleywhiteman2684]

thought part of it looked like the coast road going into Weymouth

[@chriscurrie5597]

Had 2, over the years, and am now looking for a weekend car, so its either a saab 9-3, or I've seen a 2004 1, owner c70 collection 58,000 miles, very very tempted

[@tibork3845]

He keeps saying just under 200 HP but that's only the LT model. We have the HT model which outputs 236 HP. So two different models but he only talks about one of them.

[@ashleywhiteman2684]

2.4T 190/ 193 bhp , t5 2.3 240bhp, 2.0T 163 bhp

[@ZhadTheRad]

Hello from Sweden

[@colinjack2578]

Good

[@DoubleDeckerAnton]

The cheapest ULEZ compliant car for London...and all for £1-2000.

[@MrGman2804]

Spends the first 25% of the video unsuccessfully trying to be funny,but I want info about a car!

[@gbpegasus46]

Very bad car...poor build quality.

[@waldemarthecat7611]

Poor build quality? That‘s nonsense. Mine is more than 18 years old with almost no problems till now, top included. No rust either.

[@gbpegasus46]

@@waldemarthecat7611Lots of flex /torsion in the car and many problems with airco are common

[@marcusjosefsson4998]

​​@@gbpegasus46Flex is normal for a convertible.
Blaming a non-functional A/C in a 20+ years old car is just silly. That's not poor build quality, it's simply age. By the way the A/C in my '98 Volvo S70 works like new, but it's been serviced as it should.