Interestingly enough, there are ways to do it in 3 lines and even one line technically. You could do it in 3 lines if you essentially draw a slanted N, hitting every dot once it’s stretched far enough. Also , if you were to print this on paper, you can roll the paper into a cylinder and then make one continuous line around the whole cylinder and cover every dot with one stroke. So always remember there are always more efficient ways.
When thinking about this problem the N method was the first solution I came up with, and it technically is not restricted by the rules provided. In a graphical situation points and lines have zero width, so it wouldn’t be functional. However, he says “Like this” and with the size of the dots and lines provided, you can definitely use 3 ~0.01 slope lines to hit all the dots.
and still the n wouldn't work because it depends on how big thepoints are, in the end if we really want to do this with punctual Points it'ss nt possible no matter how long you stretch it. And thhe cylinder doesn't work with the straight lne but i might understood your explanation of it wrong
@Hermes The N works. Using the same logic and misdirection he used, we can infer that the dots are supposed to be the size drawn in the video, not graphical points, and he never said that they have to pass through the center of the dot.
***** I know they never said you couldn't, just this is a puzzle in which the solution isn't anything that would take real brain power to solve. You would simply have to say fuck it and just do it like that. If I actually had done it that way without knowing that it is the only solution I would be dissapointed with the lack of cleverness in the puzzle itself.
checkeraka47 You dont get the point of this puzzle. If i told you that you can draw outside the box then it would be easy. But if i didnt then it tests if you think outside the box or you are narrow minded person. He never said you only had to be in the box.
I pretty much fried my brain trying to work this out because I didn’t know I could outside the dot’s borders lol. My brain worked harder than I thought my brain could work.
My friend told me about this puzzle 7 years ago on the bus but he did not explain it to me clearly. I remember how I spent hours trying to solve this and now, here I am at last. The feeling of satisfaction from finally finding out the solution is priceless.
They never specified how small or large we had to make the dots or how much space had to be between each one. So in theory you can solve the puzzle in one stroke if you have a giant marker.
My friend told me about this puzzle 7 years ago on the bus but he did not explain it to me clearly. I remember how I spent hours trying to solve this and now, here I am at last. The feeling of satisfaction from finally finding out the solution is priceless.
+nexus1g The video is called if you are genius solve this, I'm merely pointing out that genius has nothing to do with your ability or inability to solve it.
Seliet "I'm merely pointing out that genius has nothing to do with your ability or inability to solve it." Genius has everything to do with solving the puzzle. Genius is how quickly you can use skills previously learned in a novel way to solve a unique problem.
+nexus1g Then everyone who was in my 7th grade math class was a genius because we all solved it back then. I'm done with this, you seem to be extremely adamant about defending this test as some sort of, scientificly proven method to test genius. It's not. It's from a book of mensa puzzles. It solving this doesn't make you a genius, all it does is test your abstract thinking skills, no more, no less.
If you refer to the definition of what a line is, The solution is legal. The instructions said, "your task is to go through all the dots using straight four lines and every new line must start from where the previous line ended". That's it, there isn't any additional info. The idea is to capitalize on how open the instructions are which is exactly what the solution does. If they tried to explain it further by saying, "You can make any line as long as you want" they might as well tell you the answer, and what's the fun of that? The definition of a line answers that though. Thank you Geometry class, lol.
+KatariaGujjar That is actually pretty easy to do. First fold the paper into a cylinder and then slightly shift it where the 2 ends meet so the end of the 1st line of dots meets the start of the 2nd line. (hope that makes it clear) You can then draw 1 helix shaped line through all the points, which is in fact completely straight (you can check this by unfolding the paper).
It's weird cause it seems like there's a way to do it with the implied size limit. You start off hitting 3 dots with your first line, and if you somehow manage to hit 2 dots per line in the next 3 lines you hit 9 dots exactly (3 +2+2+2 for each line) you can only hit 2 dots after you draw the first, unless you expand the lines out or do some of the things suggested. The main problem with trying to do it legitimately is that the dots aren't in a possible configuration. The way they're set out makes it so that the last 2 dots you'd need to hit are impossible to get with one straight line.
It is not possible becuz Dots-: 1. 2. 3. 11 4. 5. 6 7. 8. 9 10 Note-: the dots 10 and 11 are imaginary Steps-: 1) start from line 1 and go till line 10 2) from 10 make a line till 11 3) next make a line from 11 to 1 4) and finally make a line from 1 to 9
Okay, ffs these comments. This puzzle has nothing to do with intelligence. "Genius" is not a term anyone should ever really be using because it makes it sound like only some people are smart and that's 100% not true. In a classroom of 20 kids there is actually a pretty good chance that one of them already knows the answer, or will get it without trying, just because everyone thinks differently -- that doesn't make them some kind of magic genius. People need to stop pretending like knowing something others don't makes you better than them.
notsuretho With few exceptions, all humans are capable of learning pretty much the same amount. The only difference is in people's learning environments. Most developed nations these days have education systems that only certain people can learn in. And most of the rest of the people in those systems are discouraged from learning, because when they struggle they are put down by their teachers, peers, parents, and even the education system administration. They are taught that if they can't learn in one particular way then they can't learn at all, and that's demonstrably wrong. The fact that, as you put it, "only a small percentage of our population are truly genius" is a byproduct of our educational systems and has nothing to do with the human capacity for intelligence.
That's incorrect. Every line must start where the other ends but one cannot start if there is no dot, therefore one not being able to start nor end due to conflicting principles.
Yeah, and the thing is he gave the enuntiate with no written rule for the junction points of lines. The junctions points were implicitly the blacks points because he drew an example where the junction points are the black points.
+Conatus No, it says that the total number of straigt lines can only be 4. No more straight lines than 4. I was going to comment something similar but checking the comments saved me some time (not really since I am typing). So I guess you are not so genius after all. And by you, I mean the one who came up with this in this video in particular. Great Nova Powered MC !
***** Lol if that isn't sarcasm the irony is he said: Eye (I), Ham (am), Stew(stu), peed (pid). So if you are being serious you just called yourself stupid.
I remember when my teacher back in church did this test with us for some reason, 8 year old me's solution was to go to the storage locker in the back of the room and grab a big ass brush and make just a single really thick line that covered the entire thing, i don't know to this day if i was a genius or dumbass lol
@@mr.dirtydan3338 i don't know if other churches do this but the one i went to had a set of classes that happened before the regular church stuff, it's basically a mini school for christians lol
There is actually a simplier solution, where you can solve this puzzle with a singular line. If you make a tubular object out of this sheet of paper you could actually send one line going all the way around it under a small angle, so it hits all the dots. And before you say that it's impossible to make a tubular object out of a sheet of paper: use glue, duct tape, stapler or anything otherwise adhesive or binding in order to fix parralel ends of the sheet of paper together, thus, creating a tube.
I just looked into this, and then make a proof that it is impossible if all the start and end must be on these dots, then done, i looked to other points : not on dots
My teacher once made me do this puzzle and gave me one hint “Think outside of the box.” And she meant that literally. Edit: what the hell happened when I was gone for a week?!?! This comment got 111 likes and there’s a argument if it’s a box or not?!?! Edit 2: who cares if it’s a box or not because “think outside of the nine dots.” “Or think outside of the square.” Sounds stupid. Edit 3: oh and “think outside of the million (or more) atoms bonded together.” Sounds especially stupid *ahem ahem KEN*
I've got the answer. Take a marker, and draw a line all around the earth. Put the line on a slight angle so that when you come back it will hit the next 3 dots. Do it in one line that way
Look at the title, *just look at the title* , guys! This, is what a proper title should look like, and what we’re getting now is “only 1% can win this game”🤦♀️
I gave this to my whole family to try this Me: tried but gave up My brother: he didn’t even try and was kinda annoyed when I told him the answer My mother : tried but made it with 5 lines and was also annoyed when I told her the answer My father : he tried many times but couldn’t follow the last rule and kept swearing when I told him the answer
It is possible with only 3 strokes. Rules only say that the lines have to be straight. If you start with your marker way below the first row of dots, then draw a straight line slightly diagonally through all 3 dots in that row so you can turn around at the top and repeat for the remainikg rows, it works
It's easy to solve this.I already figured it out,all you do is that you make a line on the vertical line on the left side of the box,then put a horizontal line on the bottom,them put another vertical line on the right side,then for last in the middle of the bottom dot,put a line there,and it makes a W.Duuhhhhhh!
that's a cheat. I tried to solve it without going outside the dots and I couldn't solve it. I thought I was going to see a cleverer person than me on this video, not a smart-ass..
MCJBeatz if u say like this then ...>>drawing a 2d plane on earth is never possible man>> bcoz earth is round nd the plane should extend upto infinity in all directions>> nd also drawing a straight line is not possible>> we only show upto that portion of a line in which we r interested nd just cleverly give n arrow to indicate that it xtends in both directions>>
UA-cam decided to put this video in our For You page, 13 years later... This was made even before I was born. 2011. (2011 is not the correct year but I can't tell ya!)
I HAVE BETTER SOLUTION make a line in the left from bottom then take right and go till last dot then go down to last dot then connect it with middle then go down and connect where you started from.
For the top 3 dots, draw a horizontal line, then do another one for the centre 3 dots, and one more for the bottom 3 dots, then from the centre bottom to centre top, draw a vertical line through.
Am I a genius or an idiot? When someone showed me this problem years ago, I immediately grabbed the pen and drew vertical line though left and middle lines.....and then I folded the paper so that the line from the left side would "touch" the right slide.
It is creative indeed. But if you are to solve by the rule, it would be wrong, coz you were suppose to make use of 4 lines and not any less than 4. Try it out this way and you'll find it challenging.
+Rajiv Tharayil no there's no possible way of doing that there is no more dots left it's like if you told me to eat a cookie in 4 bites I wold just shove it in my mouth
I can do it in one line. Take a giant like 10 inch marker and draw one line that covers all 9 dots.
Omg lmao
TRUE
+NovaCrackers hahahaha lol!!!
Hahhaha
+NovaCrackers savage
Guess I'm a genius then, managed to solve it without looking
why are you so high up in the comments with only 14 likes?
@@pradyumnathota5909 And maybe because it's a newer comment, it's a pretty old video. But, UA-cam recommendations...
how does he still heart the comments though
@@_OK___ hes still active even after 13 years 😳
Omg i. Got ppl on 2021
You Tube is soo late.
It took 13 years to remember me and recommend it for me.
Same lol
same
Same
Same
Same
Interestingly enough, there are ways to do it in 3 lines and even one line technically. You could do it in 3 lines if you essentially draw a slanted N, hitting every dot once it’s stretched far enough. Also , if you were to print this on paper, you can roll the paper into a cylinder and then make one continuous line around the whole cylinder and cover every dot with one stroke. So always remember there are always more efficient ways.
Albert einstein has been really quiet after this
When thinking about this problem the N method was the first solution I came up with, and it technically is not restricted by the rules provided. In a graphical situation points and lines have zero width, so it wouldn’t be functional. However, he says “Like this” and with the size of the dots and lines provided, you can definitely use 3 ~0.01 slope lines to hit all the dots.
and still the n wouldn't work because it depends on how big thepoints are, in the end if we really want to do this with punctual Points it'ss nt possible no matter how long you stretch it. And thhe cylinder doesn't work with the straight lne but i might understood your explanation of it wrong
@Hermes The N works. Using the same logic and misdirection he used, we can infer that the dots are supposed to be the size drawn in the video, not graphical points, and he never said that they have to pass through the center of the dot.
Nah 2 box on left are dark one box on right is light which then makes the rectangle
You implied a size limit in the task without actually telling us there was any limit. Clever.
Silence is a common lie, as when you read ads and you think there are only positive thinks about what are you looking.
Oh.
this is the genious
When I saw this comment I thought the solution was that there was a thick line that could go though the remaining dots 🤣🤣
@@jeany5826 same lel
Dude come on, how am I supposed to assume your ALLOWED to draw the lines outside of the box.
checkeraka47 think OUTSIDE THE BOX
K if I have to think outside the box to realize that it wasn't even a challenge in the first place then no
checkeraka47 ikr like they say this and this, but they never said we were allowed to draw outside the main puzzule. its stupid
***** I know they never said you couldn't, just this is a puzzle in which the solution isn't anything that would take real brain power to solve. You would simply have to say fuck it and just do it like that. If I actually had done it that way without knowing that it is the only solution I would be dissapointed with the lack of cleverness in the puzzle itself.
checkeraka47 You dont get the point of this puzzle. If i told you that you can draw outside the box then it would be easy. But if i didnt then it tests if you think outside the box or you are narrow minded person. He never said you only had to be in the box.
I'm too far from genius...
Here before it blows up
I see you again 🤣
i bet you got 3 instead of 4 straight lines.
Gonna blow up soon
They liked.... Wow....
I pretty much fried my brain trying to work this out because I didn’t know I could outside the dot’s borders lol. My brain worked harder than I thought my brain could work.
This was the proper genius test back in the days, now we're seeing "ONLY 1% CAN PASS THIS PUZZLE"
Yes, what happened? ;(
@@aurastick1 My first thought is probably the start of corporate greed.
Lol
these 1% puzzles can be solved by 3 graders and it’s actually kinda stupid
But then you get these videos and your like yey real challenge
i saw this as a kid , and here i am again at the age of 24
WAIT A MINUTE, MOOOOOOOM IM FAMOUS!
edit- i feel old after reading all these replies...
why are we grtting recommended this
Same but only 4 years for me
Damn
Wow lol
Dayum we're the same age and I also encountered this when I was a kid because of my father 😆
Y this took 11 years for it to be in my recommended
Deku!
MIDORIYA
BEST BOY
ChxkzWtf ツ same
Same
My friend told me about this puzzle 7 years ago on the bus but he did not explain it to me clearly. I remember how I spent hours trying to solve this and now, here I am at last. The feeling of satisfaction from finally finding out the solution is priceless.
7...years....ago....
Guess you have to think _outside the box_
Me 2
Haha, good one!
No u
Lmao
Its not a box tho
If you roll the paper into a tube, you can draw a spiral and connect all the dots with 1 line.
Yeah allright but thay isnt a straight line and that were one of the rules
+joost grapendaal Well then, least you could do it with 3 straight lines
[clap clap clap]
[clap clap clap]
But it wouldn't be a straight line
You said pause and try. Thanks, now there are 4 red lines on my screen with permanent marker...
Ha ha
lmao
lol
Haha
Idiot you draw that on your paper
The problem is that with the exemples, you imply that we can only take turns on points and not somewhere else
true
Waaaaaait!! You didnt follow the rules dude. You said I have to DRAW 9 dots, but you PRINTED them on the paper!
he's just good at drawing perfect circles
+Juliun Mata (Juliun03) not with straight lines like that, there's no way!
NO!
+Trink Nix rEBEL
you are right
They never specified how small or large we had to make the dots or how much space had to be between each one. So in theory you can solve the puzzle in one stroke if you have a giant marker.
they said “like this” which points to the example.
Or just do this
.........
And then draw a line through them
From bottom left Up, right, left diagonal, right
@Emma Lee 4 strokes is the maximum, not minimum
Big brain
Top 3 Unsolved mysteries
3. Area 51
2. 301 video
1. UA-cam recomendations
U r right
this should get more likes
lmao
But Isn't 301 video included in UA-cam reccomendations since due to that we were able to discover it.
How do you get a video on your Recommendations FROM 13 YEARS AGO!?!?!?!?!
1:30 there has been a glitch in the matrix i repeat there has been a glitch in the matrix
I figured out a way to do this with one line...you have to draw one big ass line that covers all the dots.
👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍
A sinne wave is technically a line
lol... true
its not straight tho
+Баир Адгишев yes it is but what ever
Him/her : immediately draws out of the dots
Me : hey, thats illegal
Her/he is wrong too!
@@tonish727 If you put in a bucket whit red paint you will win with only 4 lines.
(Sorry for my english, i'm from Brazil).
@@tonish727 Cool. Thanks.
Forget it :(
@@tonish727 thanks
Me, a person who is too lazy to try this on paper: *“Guess I'll just use my phone's pattern password thingy”*
Everythings all fun and games until you lock your phone
@@snowflakeee lOL
@@snowflakeee IKR
I’m lazier I just used the beginning of the video
I did it with 3 lines
Makes sense how this video got recommended after 14 years❤️
Me too
finally a modern comment
My friend told me about this puzzle 7 years ago on the bus but he did not explain it to me clearly. I remember how I spent hours trying to solve this and now, here I am at last. The feeling of satisfaction from finally finding out the solution is priceless.
Thank you for this amazing comment and congratulations through Our Lord Jesus Christ in His Holy Name Amen.
Oh-
@@gabrielcarlobato3565 What the hell
@@NoUserU Amen
Oo god you waited 7 years for this lol
This isn't a genius test, it's a trick middle school math teachers use to demonstrate abstract thinking skills.
+Seliet It didn't say it was a genius test?
+nexus1g The video is called if you are genius solve this, I'm merely pointing out that genius has nothing to do with your ability or inability to solve it.
+nexus1g The first few frames of the video also have Genius Test by menkel something or other plastered in big letters.
Seliet "I'm merely pointing out that genius has nothing to do with your ability or inability to solve it."
Genius has everything to do with solving the puzzle. Genius is how quickly you can use skills previously learned in a novel way to solve a unique problem.
+nexus1g Then everyone who was in my 7th grade math class was a genius because we all solved it back then. I'm done with this, you seem to be extremely adamant about defending this test as some sort of, scientificly proven method to test genius. It's not. It's from a book of mensa puzzles. It solving this doesn't make you a genius, all it does is test your abstract thinking skills, no more, no less.
The parameters were implied to be within those dots, not outside of those dots, thus it isn't a fair puzzle or unexplained properly..
It's one of those "bending the rules puzzle"
No because they show us three samples, all of which uses dots so that was the implied rule.
"implied" does not necessarily mean truth.
If you refer to the definition of what a line is, The solution is legal. The instructions said, "your task is to go through all the dots using straight four lines and every new line must start from where the previous line ended". That's it, there isn't any additional info. The idea is to capitalize on how open the instructions are which is exactly what the solution does. If they tried to explain it further by saying, "You can make any line as long as you want" they might as well tell you the answer, and what's the fun of that? The definition of a line answers that though. Thank you Geometry class, lol.
You understand this tests one's ability to think outside the box, and you failed.
There's another rule as well. You can't cut the same dot twice. Now try again
Of course I'm a genius I can do thi-.... The fuck?
Potato64 Chips43 of course you're not a genius if you can't spell "course" right
ha ha
phokme there I changed it
Space Slug lol😂
lol
You can do it with 1 line if you have a really thick pen
LOL
tru
Pandalumpa King y
Pandalumpa King thats a thick pen bro
Pandalumpa King lol
This is bs answer.
How about I just fold the paper in an origami so I can get all the dots in one line?
+KatariaGujjar
That is actually pretty easy to do. First fold the paper into a cylinder and then slightly shift it where the 2 ends meet so the end of the 1st line of dots meets the start of the 2nd line. (hope that makes it clear)
You can then draw 1 helix shaped line through all the points, which is in fact completely straight (you can check this by unfolding the paper).
+CPTANT Agree
true
+KatariaGujjar The video was uploaded in 2008 and back then, a puzzle like this was brilliant.
+KatariaGujjar whell the rules where only 4 straight lines nothing more
It's weird cause it seems like there's a way to do it with the implied size limit. You start off hitting 3 dots with your first line, and if you somehow manage to hit 2 dots per line in the next 3 lines you hit 9 dots exactly (3 +2+2+2 for each line) you can only hit 2 dots after you draw the first, unless you expand the lines out or do some of the things suggested. The main problem with trying to do it legitimately is that the dots aren't in a possible configuration. The way they're set out makes it so that the last 2 dots you'd need to hit are impossible to get with one straight line.
that was actually easy!
after i saw how to do it
The King oml your profile pic, I thought there was an actual bug on my phone LoL
Luke Skywalker me 2
Your avatar always gets me every time >.
me too lol :)
Bruh you literally fooled me on the explanation you didnt tell me we could do that 💀
He didnt say you couldnt do that- i mean he wants you to figure it out, not give you choices
@@dharmannrulez on the examples he didnt do any close thing ton the answer
@@jareddd344 Of course, those are just examples. They made it different in the examples so its harder.
AND HE DIDN'T TELL US WE CAN'T USE PAINT AND POUR IT 😈
@@vveeboo_ he said we have to use straight lines ._.xd
I solve this on the first try
Not because I am smart or intelligent
*IT IS BECAUSE I AM A FREAKING ASIAN*
Russians eat Asians for breakfast
@@SabsWithR what does that mean?
@@SabsWithR Hahaha, okayyyy......
Goddamn it, I hate it when I always get the answer correctly. I'm just too smart!
@@mrflip-flop3198 hey you should be happy that you're smart. Just think where you will end up in life if you're dumb.
UA-cam recommended me something that's older than Rick roll
Same😀
The worst part is I remember seeing the solution to this, but I can't remember what the solution to it is.
Same lol
I remember seeing it on brain games
Same
Me too lol
True, our teacher showed this to us this 3 years ago
imagine if someone make this their phone unlocking method
Bruh what a coincidence I actually did it
@@kamabokoganpachiro4113 how did you make this your unlock method if you cant go out of bound from the dots on the phone?
@@reguit5849 idk mate it happened so Idc
It is not possible becuz
Dots-:
1. 2. 3. 11
4. 5. 6
7. 8. 9
10
Note-: the dots 10 and 11 are imaginary
Steps-:
1) start from line 1 and go till line 10
2) from 10 make a line till 11
3) next make a line from 11 to 1
4) and finally make a line from 1 to 9
@@iamgagan825 👏👏
I did it in one line.
With a paint roller.
haha :) good one!
Lol
you my friend, are the only REAL genius here
Bl Scott Genius just genius
he never said you should only do it with pencil so thats correct!
0:50 imma use this as my huewei password
first try (watching this vid made my day) :)))))))))))))))
Courtney Fisher there is one more that can line the 9 dots
wonderful
Courtney Fisher easy
Courtney Fisher Same
Courtney Fisher okkkkk????
Woooow u didn't even say u can draw out of the circles...
Kinda the point, m8.
He didn't say you can't
Caren Chau he said 4 straight lines
Caren Chau that wasent in the rules....
he never said you couldn't either
actually simple....just think outside the box ;)
+sari jaradat whaa???
LOL that was tricky
+Akib reza he know that from National Geographic maybe
+sari jaradat You can very easily do it in 3 Straight lines....
+sari jaradat Bullshit.You said pass through the dots,your lines didnt.Glad you stop making videos.
I finally solved it after 14 years.
lol
Okay, ffs these comments. This puzzle has nothing to do with intelligence. "Genius" is not a term anyone should ever really be using because it makes it sound like only some people are smart and that's 100% not true. In a classroom of 20 kids there is actually a pretty good chance that one of them already knows the answer, or will get it without trying, just because everyone thinks differently -- that doesn't make them some kind of magic genius. People need to stop pretending like knowing something others don't makes you better than them.
notsuretho
With few exceptions, all humans are capable of learning pretty much the same amount. The only difference is in people's learning environments. Most developed nations these days have education systems that only certain people can learn in. And most of the rest of the people in those systems are discouraged from learning, because when they struggle they are put down by their teachers, peers, parents, and even the education system administration. They are taught that if they can't learn in one particular way then they can't learn at all, and that's demonstrably wrong. The fact that, as you put it, "only a small percentage of our population are truly genius" is a byproduct of our educational systems and has nothing to do with the human capacity for intelligence.
i got a simple trick to fill all of those... just draw an "S", its only a line
Audrix Xz
lol! Love it!
I got it but I only did 3 lines...
thesourceofx its connected to another line so its not a 5 line
The person using wiggly lines: I’m four parallel universes ahead of you
No, that person is just stupid.
@@tisrhino He was four parrellel universes behind us.
*P A R A L L E L U N I V E R S E S*
Dead joke
Plot twist the straight lines were just not meant to be gay
That's incorrect. Every line must start where the other ends but one cannot start if there is no dot, therefore one not being able to start nor end due to conflicting principles.
+Harry Mcleod "one cannot start if there is no dot" I can't see this rule in the video.
MaharadzaStunt Every line must start where another ends. How can he start from somewhere if he does not end it at a dot, watch the video again.
And at which point does he say that a line must end at a dot?
MaharadzaStunt He says so. Watch it again.
Harry Mcleod I still can't see it. Please give me the exact timing.
I'm watching this video after 13yrs 😳 amazing
What's interesting is that there's no one way to do it, there are something like 9, if my math is right
Hey are you watching this on 2020
@@fedalanon1279 Yeah, UA-cam was like "Here's your recommended videos list, we're gonna recommend this random one from over 10 years ago ༼ つ ◕_◕ ༽つ"
Yeah, and the thing is he gave the enuntiate with no written rule for the junction points of lines. The junctions points were implicitly the blacks points because he drew an example where the junction points are the black points.
@@nicolascasteleyn9579 he just said straight lines, he drew straight lines. What more do you want.
but how mamy are just rotations or mirrors?
What breaks this video it's that we trust on it, since the guy never drew further from the dots we instantly assumed that it's also against the rules
You're a genius
Or just go basses off of the rules
I can do it without any straight lines - just draw curved lines. #REKT
That would defeat the point you could just draw one line over all the points
+Nova Powered MC It says you have to use straight lines.
+Nova Powered MC you do an S of SUCESS
+Conatus No, it says that the total number of straigt lines can only be 4. No more straight lines than 4.
I was going to comment something similar but checking the comments saved me some time (not really since I am typing).
So I guess you are not so genius after all. And by you, I mean the one who came up with this in this video in particular.
Great Nova Powered MC !
+Raj Harsh Well... I guess that's just down to interpretations of the rules, lol. It said "Using only 4 STRAIGHT lines".
1. Middle column
2. top row
3. left column
4. Right column
The rules did not state that you could extend the line beyond the perimeter.
They didn't say you couldn't though
+Xander Polk We were under the idea that it would be alike a password on a tablet or phone.
there is no perimeter, do you see any box surrounding the dots? the only perimeter is the edges of the paper, which he didnt go beyond
I said idea. It was the idea that we had to stay within boundaries that fooled us. Had you fallen for it?
Neither did they say it couldnt
ONLY A GENIUS CAN SAY THIS
EYE-HAM-STEW-PEED
Nice one!
GoldenClaw3 well this is the first time I saw it
Rainbow Unicorn With Horns Channel Cant tell if troll, but if it isn't then... you be stupid
benjamin smithynunta LOL! You almost tricked me into saying it.
***** Lol if that isn't sarcasm the irony is he said:
Eye (I), Ham (am), Stew(stu), peed (pid).
So if you are being serious you just called yourself stupid.
People who came to the comment section
👇
I remember when my teacher back in church did this test with us for some reason, 8 year old me's solution was to go to the storage locker in the back of the room and grab a big ass brush and make just a single really thick line that covered the entire thing, i don't know to this day if i was a genius or dumbass lol
You're genius
Your teacher in church? Why would you have a teacher in church?
@@mr.dirtydan3338 i don't know if other churches do this but the one i went to had a set of classes that happened before the regular church stuff, it's basically a mini school for christians lol
@@ashuto2025 you mean Sunday school
Both
My music teacher had us do this while we waited to perform. After 6 years of doing it we still keep forgetting the answer.
HAHA
kekw
@@will0wtr335 normie
There is actually a simplier solution, where you can solve this puzzle with a singular line. If you make a tubular object out of this sheet of paper you could actually send one line going all the way around it under a small angle, so it hits all the dots. And before you say that it's impossible to make a tubular object out of a sheet of paper: use glue, duct tape, stapler or anything otherwise adhesive or binding in order to fix parralel ends of the sheet of paper together, thus, creating a tube.
"To think like a genius, sometimes you have to think outside the box"
-Idk
This is so deep I think I just shit myself
It's not about thinking outside the box. It's about realizing that there's no box
I just took a giant marker and made a line go through all of them in one line…
U have to legit go outside the box
I just looked into this, and then make a proof that it is impossible if all the start and end must be on these dots, then done, i looked to other points : not on dots
I did it in just 1 line.
With very small dots and a huge marker...
With very small dots and a big marker
Jonn Ballehr woah you solved it like that too!
Jonn Ballehr lol smartypants
is you bend your space......
Jonn Ballehr OMG u are a genius
I wish you would’ve said we can go off the dots, I spent like an hour on this
29 All Day the point was to think outside the box
_OmegaLink_ and you just replied to a comment from a year ago
BeyBlade Warrior oh tru
_OmegaLink_ lol
@@beybladewarrior468 so did you
When this video was uploaded a year before you were born 😀
My teacher once made me do this puzzle and gave me one hint “Think outside of the box.” And she meant that literally.
Edit: what the hell happened when I was gone for a week?!?! This comment got 111 likes and there’s a argument if it’s a box or not?!?!
Edit 2: who cares if it’s a box or not because “think outside of the nine dots.” “Or think outside of the square.” Sounds stupid.
Edit 3: oh and “think outside of the million (or more) atoms bonded together.” Sounds especially stupid *ahem ahem KEN*
OUT SIDE THE BOXXXXXXX
@@yourlocalsabrina3240 i like ur energy
@@Vollee Good for you, but I hate it.
its not even a box, why is everyone beside me so dumb
@@dawidek4267 why are YOU SO DUMB IT IS A 2D BOX
Oh...
I solved it a different way.
Same
same
Same
ohh congrats. i not genius
i am not.. wrong grammar
This isn't genius stuff this is assuming the most basic rules of this kind of game don't apply
Ikr
Yes
Adriani 268
the point of it is that it is impossible to complete unless you go outside the box. it is an underlying message
@@Ethanweller69 not impossible
You know a video gonna be good if its 13 years ago and was filmed with a toaster
rules never said you couldn't fold the paper.
So true!!! LMAO
LFZ lmao yeah
LOL!
True
One of the tips and trickes
I've got the answer. Take a marker, and draw a line all around the earth. Put the line on a slight angle so that when you come back it will hit the next 3 dots. Do it in one line that way
you are not a genius
but yoj are funny
please calculate me that angle
@Guarav Jindal is on about the degree of an angle, he wants the degree of the angle so that he could basically calculate the: "Equation".
Straight line drawn around a body will always come back at same point because there are no curve or bends
Imagine a guy said he managed to do this when he actually looked the reveal
So, imagine cheating then? Wow. Hard to imagine something people do every day and have been doing for thousands of years. Stfu
@@idrinkmilk282 bro you don't get the old words bruh said by mr breast
@@tisrhino you are talking to me lmao lol omg hahaha
but wheres reveal vid-
@Jean Flores dude, I’m on your side here, but there “insults” towards tisrhino gotta be better than calling him 11
i did it using 4 straight line but then 1 line became gay so i had 3 lines and a circle
Look at the title, *just look at the title* , guys!
This, is what a proper title should look like, and what we’re getting now is “only 1% can win this game”🤦♀️
Copied comment lmao
@@oldfrankvystern2521 I didn’t copy anyone, there’re loads of these kind of comments here, it’s normal if the comments are similar
@@dummie9614 I SAID ITS COPIED YOU HEAR ME?!
@@oldfrankvystern2521 sorry, I don’t understand dogs
@@oldfrankvystern2521 chill
This is one of those situations where instead of it being "Aww, cool, that's what I had to do", it becomes "AH, HOW WAS I SUPPOSED TO KNOW THAT?"
yeah
By thinking outside the box
@@notvex3987 literally
My feelings exactly
Mk mythologies sub zero was THE EMBODIMENT OF THAT
Bruh 30 million views 30Thousand subscribers 73K Likes
Anwar Abdi بدك تحسدنا شكلك
sari jaradat
I can solve this in my sleep
Dab
MAIBIG BUTT sure you fucking can
A curve is technically a line so you could use curved lines to beet it in around 2
Chuck Norris solved this problem, and he only used one line.
TNBLUEDIXIE 2005 called, it wants its stale meme back
Nick Perko 1995 called it wants its joke back
TNBLUEDIXIE lol jk
How does that work? Does he just make a marker thats very thick and draw a line across all 9 circles?
TheHypeGamer No He Ripped The Paper In Thirds Taped It So They R In A Line
I gave this to my whole family to try this
Me: tried but gave up
My brother: he didn’t even try and was kinda annoyed when I told him the answer
My mother : tried but made it with 5 lines and was also annoyed when I told her the answer
My father : he tried many times but couldn’t follow the last rule and kept swearing when I told him the answer
Instead of being annoyed I just accept the fact I failed and try to improve so I can do better :)
Just draw 3 lines that have 2 dots in them that are going from left to right. Use the last line to capture the last remaining dots
Underrated af
@@travisscott3050 the next line has to start where the last one ended
Because it doesn't has to do with logic, it's just a lame trick
Really? I come from some guy solving an 11x11x11 rubiks cube to this child's play?
ME TOO LOL
Damn UA-cam's video suggestions
MoonPrincess331 Yeah we know you guys are smart bravo.
Shhh, it's okay. ^o^
Me too.. :D
Seria contra as regras resolver com apenas uma única linha curva? 🤔
if you are genius why did you click this video.
If every line must start where the last one ended, you can't make the first line because there's no line to start off of.
Nice one haha
o God
I’m on that side of UA-cam again
MarGuy Thatguy **oh*
100th like
It is possible with only 3 strokes. Rules only say that the lines have to be straight.
If you start with your marker way below the first row of dots, then draw a straight line slightly diagonally through all 3 dots in that row so you can turn around at the top and repeat for the remainikg rows, it works
The rules also specify that it must be 4 lines.
I saw this shit on Brain Games you can't fool me
Haha me to
Brian Morgan well played.
You were on the Rubik's cube thing
+84updown LOL
+84updown then answer
go outside the box
haha roy you're so stupid this is a very simple puzzle stop playing games and start studying
god Da Royals u can't solve that?
ikr
It's easy to solve this.I already figured it out,all you do is that you make a line on the vertical line on the left side of the box,then put a horizontal line on the bottom,them put another vertical line on the right side,then for last in the middle of the bottom dot,put a line there,and it makes a W.Duuhhhhhh!
i know right
YOU NEVER SAID WE COULD GO OUTSIDE THE DOTS
But he did not say that we mustn't do this.
He never said we couldnt😭
that's a cheat. I tried to solve it without going outside the dots and I couldn't solve it. I thought I was going to see a cleverer person than me on this video, not a smart-ass..
+Filio Pap Who is a clever person? Who only thinks inside the box? How is the smartness ranked, by knowledge?
Why do you expect he explains how to solve it? That would be too easy...seriously
This video is:
✔ Life changing ✔ Informative
✔ Inspiring ✔ Heartwarming
✔ Useful ✔calming ✔Enjoyable
✔ Other
You really had to think OUT OF THE BOX for this one
Wow... this is actually really clever.
The Potato Man SHUT UP. NOBODY LIKES PUN KILLERS LIKE YOU
Thomas Kaldahl not to be rude, but people don't like haters like you :\
ArrowTheWolf You square.
ArrowTheWolf I guess youre more 3d than me.
Impossible. Any "genius" would know that those were line SEGMENTS, not lines!
the point is that you have to think out of the box to solve it. There are no rules make it invalid.
Samson Simhon The rules of life state that these are line segments, not lines. That fact alone makes this invalid ;)
KILLTHESHROOM OH DAYUM! :O
KILLTHESHROOM Ok math genius ;)
MCJBeatz if u say like this then ...>>drawing a 2d plane on earth is never possible man>> bcoz earth is round nd the plane should extend upto infinity in all directions>> nd also drawing a straight line is not possible>> we only show upto that portion of a line in which we r interested nd just cleverly give n arrow to indicate that it xtends in both directions>>
This has a moral: Think outside the box!
Gg
Lol yea
as soon as I saw him do it all inside the box I just thought outside the box
Yea like pretend there are invisible dots. Pretend what isn't there to make the answer you want. Whaa-laaa you're a genius
ikr
UA-cam decided to put this video in our For You page, 13 years later...
This was made even before I was born. 2011. (2011 is not the correct year but I can't tell ya!)
It's called 'Think outside the box'.
This reminds me of my phone passcode
now 32,741,964 people can hack into your phone
+sari jaradat Oh, well that's just great.
***** ty
+VeryCoolAnd AmazingGamerTag we don't need to hear who you are
+Sasuke Uchiha haha i whas tired so guess i can take that
so that’s what “think outside the box” means
ye
I HAVE BETTER SOLUTION
make a line in the left from bottom then take right and go till last dot then go down to last dot then connect it with middle then go down and connect where you started from.
Funfact: No one Searched for this everyone got recommended after 13 years🤣🤣🤣
Edit : Thanks for 144 likes
Funni 😐
I a c t u a l l y s e a r c h e d f o r t h i s
@@rainiiqx Ohh
How do i even search for this
Yep- it just randomly popped up in my recommendation💀
Feeling genius with 41million other. Did you solve it?
My 2 year old niece can come up with comments better than yours
@@Anonymous-zw8kx it was a joke...
It was too ez
This is the first time seeing dabo comment with less than 10 likes even after 4 months. UA-cam algorithm drunk
Solve it!
1:21 We've been tricked, we've been backstabbed and we've been quite possibly, bamboozled!
For the top 3 dots, draw a horizontal line, then do another one for the centre 3 dots, and one more for the bottom 3 dots, then from the centre bottom to centre top, draw a vertical line through.
Am I a genius or an idiot? When someone showed me this problem years ago, I immediately grabbed the pen and drew vertical line though left and middle lines.....and then I folded the paper so that the line from the left side would "touch" the right slide.
+joestl314 That sounds like genius to me, You followed all the rules and came up with a creative answer.
I don't know but it was clever. But it wasn't right either.
It is creative indeed.
But if you are to solve by the rule, it would be wrong, coz you were suppose to make use of 4 lines and not any less than 4.
Try it out this way and you'll find it challenging.
+Rajiv Tharayil no there's no possible way of doing that there is no more dots left it's like if you told me to eat a cookie in 4 bites I wold just shove it in my mouth
+joestl314 that... is genius.