Canon R6 Mark II vs Canon R7: Full-Frame vs APS-C Showdown & Wildlife Photography Comparison

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 5 лип 2024
  • In this video, we dive into the world of Canon mirrorless cameras, comparing the Canon R6 Mark II with the Canon R7. From sensor sizes to functionalities, we explore how these cameras cater to different photography needs. Discover the advantages of full-frame vs APS-C sensors, learn about depth of field differences, and see how each camera performs in wildlife photography scenarios. Whether you're a professional photographer or a content creator, this comparison will help you choose the perfect camera for your creative endeavors. Don't miss out on our in-depth analysis and real-world examples! Subscribe now for more photography content and gear reviews.
    R6 mark ii auto focus setup- • Set Up Custom Back But...
    R7 auto focus setup- • How To Set Up Dual Bac...
  • Фільми й анімація

КОМЕНТАРІ • 17

  • @kosowskj
    @kosowskj 3 місяці тому +4

    I have both. I use the R7 for birds and wildlife and the R6 MKii for everything else. If I could only have one, it would be the R7 as that is my primary genre that I photograph.

    • @PPNJ
      @PPNJ  3 місяці тому

      Totally agree with you. Thank you for watching the video! I appreciate it.

  • @michaelhornyak7506
    @michaelhornyak7506 3 місяці тому +2

    I'm trying to decide on a camera since a teenager owned a Canon camera. I shoot all sorts of things. Flowers to wildlife. Been using Canon D300 thinks it's about 20 years old. So far I'm thinking R5 or R5-2. I appreciate all the good information you give us.

    • @PPNJ
      @PPNJ  3 місяці тому +1

      You’ll be happy with either of those. I love my R6 ii but I can’t lie. Having the R5 would be awesome. You could crop so hard on a 45mp sensor and still have amazing detail. A little out of my price range but maybe I’ll get a used one someday. Thank you for always watching and commenting on here.

    • @michaelhornyak7506
      @michaelhornyak7506 3 місяці тому +1

      I enjoy watching you you give good tips

  • @barryinny
    @barryinny 25 днів тому +1

    I'm going on an expedition Arctic trip July 2025 and realized I needed a camera LOL... My last real camera was a Canon F-1 bought in 1974. Anyway - I ordered and received a Sony 6700 on Friday. Literally took it out of the box and said what a p-o-s toy... I got big hands and it felt like one of those old Kodak throw away cameras they'd put on the table at weddings... Anyway, I'm returning it asap. I'm now looking at the R7 or R6M2. I know it's all about the range for shooting Polar bears in the arctic so lens selection is critical plus you get that extra mileage from the R7 (altho you could get an extender for the R6)? Also - i don't want to carry more than 2 lenses on the trip and definitely it will be a pain to swap lenses while on the move like in a moving Zodiac wanting to shoot my wife (literally) fairly close to me but also be able to grab distance shots of the elusive bear. SO - I'll definitely need a zoom that will do the job for me. What do you guys suggest for camera and lens? I want IBIS and great AF. This camera will basically become a hybrid I can use going forward for anything I'll ever need. PS: I have time to buy since I'm more than a year away but need a few months to get comfortable with the setup... Is there anything coming down the pike that would serve me better?

  • @rexio_1516
    @rexio_1516 3 місяці тому +1

    Hey Jesse! What do you think about the Rf 200-800mm? Will you get one? :)

    • @PPNJ
      @PPNJ  3 місяці тому +1

      I think it’s a very intriguing lens. I don’t currently plan to get one myself but 200-800 is an awesome range to have for wildlife. I have the 800 f/11 and enjoy having that reach. The prime 800 makes finding your subject tough sometimes having that 200-800 zoom would be amazing. I have a few friends with them on order when they get them in I will try to get my hands on one and make a review video if I can.

  • @gerhardbotha7336
    @gerhardbotha7336 Місяць тому +1

    The R7 surprised me. I get great images and performance from it. Now have the Metabones 0.71x speedbooster to get 1 stop light advantage and close to FF look. I think there is a strong possibility of not buying a R6ii in future- maybe a second R7 ii when it comes

    • @PPNJ
      @PPNJ  Місяць тому

      Not everyone needs a full frame camera. I would think for most photographers especially mainly wildlife photographers the R7 is more than sufficient. Thanks for watching the channel and commenting I really appreciate it.

  • @ThasBR1
    @ThasBR1 29 днів тому

    I have both. I used the R7 for a long time to photograph motorcycles. One thing I don't see anyone talking much about is the handling, and the R6II's is far superior in my personal opinion. I Use both with an RF 100-500L. Currently I only use the R7 when I need more range and that's it. Within the range of the lens, the R6ii is superior in every way.

    • @barryinny
      @barryinny 25 днів тому

      what about the handling - please elaborate...thanks.

  • @rexio_1516
    @rexio_1516 2 місяці тому +1

    One question, can you customize the red record button on the R6 II? Or is it still useless?

    • @PPNJ
      @PPNJ  2 місяці тому +1

      I’m pretty sure it’s still a useless auto record setting like the original R6. Sucks because it would be nice to program actual usable settings and be able to trigger recording while in picture mode but canon said no for us R6 and R6ii users. I believe the R5 does allow you to do what you want though.

    • @rexio_1516
      @rexio_1516 2 місяці тому

      Ah thats sad..

  • @hongkongkong7174
    @hongkongkong7174 3 місяці тому +1

    r6mii + 70-200 2.8L + 50 non L prime + 28 non L prime. Everything covered

    • @PPNJ
      @PPNJ  3 місяці тому

      Oh man I would love to get my hands on the RF 70-200f/2.8L that’s one of my dream lenses! Sounds like you’ve got a great setup. Thanks for watching the channel and commenting on here I really appreciate it!