Yet even despite all of this, he was married to his high school sweetheart for 50 years, until she sadly passed away from Alzheimer's. Most neurotypical people aren't that lucky. It really does serve as a stunning example of just how important the role of nurturing is in the development of a person.
Oh, she did die from Alzheimer’s? That was their big fear. Both of her parents died from Alzheimer’s. In fact, that was one of the reason’s they initially did the PET scans of the family. He needed a “normal” control group for a study he was working on (for Alzheimer’s, ironically), but also it was an opportunity to see if her brain showed any signs of the disease. Which it did not at the time. I wonder what all of this means for their children.
@@tatie7604 It depends on the type of outcome. It’s very easy to create a predictable bad outcome consistently in people but the same cannot be said about a good outcome.
Dr. Fallon is to be admired for his total honesty about his ancesters and the psychopathy that runs throughout his family tree. Many Ph.D.'s would not dare share this most personal and private information about themselves, let alone, their family. Thank you for posting this video.
"Total Honesty" is your ignorant perception, caused by Ignoring what they "act" like to achieve that "win" from you. I married one ... and I am no longer Ignorant .. I do not Ignore anymore, I Watch, Listen, and Confirm. They weaponize Trust.
Well hes a psychopath he doesn't get nervous or anxiety or anything like that so why would he not he doesn't have any real real feelings towards anybody else.
I've seen this guy on another programme talking on the same issue. In an interview with his family he asked "would you believe I have these traits" all his family said yes. His mother and brothers all recognised when he was young the unusual emotional reactions he had in comparison to them. When aged 15 he had openly argued at an Aunts funeral that he had a party to go to instead, not bothered by the commotion he was creating for others in favour for his own needs.
If you were the golden child you were abused. We just need to expand our definition of abuse. Putting a child on the pedestal is abuse. It does damage to the child in the long run.
🧐 No, I think it depends on the child. In case, of this neuroscientist James Fallon, the care and attention subdued his psychopathic tendencies, which otherwise would’ve expressed very strongly. Did you see his brain map ? 😳
***** Sounds more like sociopath behavior. At least in my experience psychopaths are usually extremely intelligent since the stupid ones end up in prison. Sociopaths usually do stuff for the doing of it where as psychopaths do it for the end goal.
***** Hmm, hard to say. Psychopaths usually don't have children so that maybe another point pointing him towards sociopathy. Or maybe he is just an average man with a short temper, who knows.
***** My mom was more of a narcissistic abuser and once I figured out & confirmed what the hell was going on, I told her to kick rocks. (obviously it was way harder than I'm making it seem, just skipping some of the gory details) Best decision I ever made, though
John Wayne Gacy. I met him as a small child. It was late evening at my grandparents produce stand. My Grandma leaned over and told me, "dont let go of Grandma's hand." We are not a huggy feely family but good to each other. We rounded the corner of the building. There he was buying apples. He looked at her, then stared at me. Eyes a beautiful blue Ice cold. I still feel cold when I think of it. She squeezed my hand. I have wondered to this day is he saw us kids and my cousins playing at the farm behind us. Stalking the farm. I remember she took me into the back room and locked the door. There was no woman I knew as her and the other women of our family. She began to close up NOW and he left with some apples. Latter I would remember here at the house. She double checked all the windows and doors. Barn, informed the help to lock up after they got paid, She was outside a few times before bed. She somehow knew. She just knew. In my life I would meet 7 known killers. I suspect others. I am very very careful. You be careful also.
I have met what i think was a psychopath. He just drained the energy out of people, was very intelligent (maybe smart, cunning is a better description) and there was nothing really there in his eyes. I never really could have a true conversation with him. His motives were always calculated and ice cold, like how a robot would reason. One could argue if these psychopaths are really human beings. Since what it really means to be human, completely lacks in them. The scary thing is that they are masters in acting like they are normal, but when you have known them for a while, you will find out.
You have met many psychopaths and sociopaths. Depending on your definition and where you live, psychopaths represent as much as 4% of the population. That's 1 in 25. You have probably known dozens of psychopaths.
Psychopaths aren't necessarily violent people. Some are, but honestly, there are plenty of law-abiding psychopaths out there. It's a myth that violence & criminality are cornerstone characteristics of psychopaths.
I love the study of neuro-cognition. As a musician, historian, and educator it fascinates me. But I have one problem with this area of study philosophically. It is entirely deterministic. There are people who have the three predispositions of psychopathy (genetics, loss of brain function, and who have suffered abuse) who could have easily become psychopaths, but for some reason did not, and in fact may be living moral lives. The problem with seeing all behaviour as the result of nature and nurture is that it overlooks the idea of free will. The legal system may have the right attitude when it comes to this issue. If a person is solely the result of nature and nurture, how is it moral to hold him accountable for his crime? Psychopaths are not crazy. They do have the ability to distinguish between right and wrong, even if their consciouses do not bother them. As far as I know, neuroscience has not been able to point to the area of the brain that controls free will, but that does not mean that free will does not exist. Neuroscience must make an attempt to account for the existence of free will because often free will is the determinative factor between lawful and criminal behaviour.
This is covered in studies on consciousness. It turns out, our brains are constantly making pre-conscious decisions all the time, so we don't exactly have free will.
"our brains are constantly making pre-conscious decisions all the time" That argument falls far short of proving free will does not exist. In fact it's very weak. Unfortunately, those scientists who desire to negate free will have a bad history of overstating their case with this argument. The absolute truth is, we do not yet have ANY IDEA how consciousness operates. Until we do, it is fantastically dishonest to make statements like yours, as if the question has been settled.
@@deanray553 👏 you're so true and I always felt that this idea of "you have no free will" must be an oversimplification. But I can't come up with any scientists who'd written or talked about it. It's just Sapolsky everywhere and no opponent. Maybe you know and could recommend somebody? or some articles?
I have watched twenty utube videos by "experts" talking about narcissists and psychopaths. Only two knew clinically how to differentiate ,by DSM, categorically between the two.Fallon is one of them.
I'm much like James. Very analytical, reason thru everything, 2 plus two equals 4 and always will. I'm even a libertarian as well. But my relationship with people tends to be superficial even with people I love dearly. I can be very charming and a people person when necessary even though I'd prefer not to be. I'm not violent but I could be under the right circumstances like defending myself or a family member. I had a good childhood knowing I was loved and taken care of. Fascinating videos.
@@shrimptyd8059 I'm agnostic about the matter now whereas before I had more made up my mind about it. I also ended up developing a more open mind about God - or something along those lines because of the hard problem of consciousness, as well as the fact that such an amazing mystery is at the core of why our lives have the possibility of being meaningful in some sense. It's a short blurb for about 15 years of reasoning/searching, reading the great problems of analytic philosophy, but trying to understand other things as well.
@@hellomate639 , the ability to change one’s mind is a positive sign of intelligence. Good for you. If you have the time, which part of the following 10 minute video do you happen to disagree with?: DETERMINISM 🆚 free will 📺 ua-cam.com/video/vCGtkDzELAI/v-deo.html (10 minute video | Crash Course)
My father is exactly like this and spent 22 years as a beloved husband and Pastor and good attentive father to me. It really depends on what traits the psychopaths express not all of them are hollywoods gross version of a violent abuser....some are motivated by things simple as the game of chess
Fascinating. I'm reminded of the book 'Psychopath!' by Morton Bane or Bain - written by a diagnosed psychopath. Who would know more about the condition than a sufferer?
Just a note: It's the "connections" of the brain, "as in behavior & intelligence" that determines a psychopath within a society (within an enviroment) It's not simply the shape of the brain This would omit a large population of psychopaths especially at corporate or administrative levels (risk & getting away with it) Example: If a person places their hand into a fire "the brain's connections are different from" a person who would not put their hand in a fire "Behavior & Intelligence" is decisive
He discusses which presidents were more psychopathic here - "Dr. James Fallon Discusses the Traits of Pro-Social (good) Psychopaths." What is interesting is that the factors that made those presidents famous and loved were the traits associated with psychopathy.
He is a Narcissist but his pathology isn’t Narcissism. As Psycopaths are Narcissist by default, they act very differently than traditional Narcissists. They are way more manipulative and appear less overtly demanding.
He’s fully aware and yet if he gets angry, which you have not seen will unleash his psychopathy and it would not be so nice. And btw he is not nice in this video. He is very aggressive, arrogant and passive aggressive in this video, you just fell for his charm, he uses his education and knowledge to gain trust and his jokes. He is not that nice to people close to him or to people that annoy him which is most people, he also is talking down to everyone
He hasn't got a psychopathic personality. He has some genetic markers that could predicate psychopath behaviour given poor nurturing or extreme circumstances. That has not occurred.
Once the mind is damaged, its extremely difficult to correct. I mean depression for instance can never really be cured. The symptoms can be controlled, but ask depressives whether they are cured and they'll tell you they still have bad days. However, a bad day for a psychopath might see some innocent member of the public badly injured or dead. I mean should we take that risk with serious offenders?
When you "reason" away conflicts you end up acting really irrational. If you look at John McCafe, who was the libertarian candidate in the election before last, he is intellectually brilliant, but also completely out of his mind.
This is very scary.... 'it will interesting to see what role ultimately neuro-science plays in public policy.' This will become the scourge of the 21st century.
A question still harbored by many, is how does a schizoid serial rapist, even multiple murderer, say, end up being overlooked - as many infamous murderers such as Gacy and Dahmer were - as ordinary men with casual charm, but not clear as to them having a type of sociopath personality/neurosis complex or what have you. If that is so, what are the neurological patterns of the people who see such monsters as normal, as opposed to those, who, offhand or not, notice an intrinsic character flaw?
@Libertarianist Agree. "Did you know you would go to jail if you got caught?" is the only relevant question when deciding ability to stand trial for one's actions. If someone knowingly violates the law, that is the only measure of competence that matters. So lying to investigators, hiding, running from the law, and trying not to get caught for a crime is automatically an indication of rational understanding of the consequences of one's actions and the awareness of violating of the law.
I was told when I was seeking help for my extreme narcissistic tendencies that you will only get so far until you just can't figure out anymore. It's like the god particle you can only Trace it back so far before you have to look at each other and say at this point we just got to leave it until a higher power. This person's theory on people like us is we create a balance. If everybody in that room had good intentions and the same mentality. The world really wouldn't exist because you have to have resistance in order to get a forward motion. Who knows, hopefully when they were able to break through and really identify these things and identify why I know for a fact I was this person before trauma ever happened to me. My furthest back memories are me being this guy and then the trauma happened so it seems like it's timed out almost
we need to bring that back so people realize they can stop being crazy by changing their behavior instead of going "wo is me, I'm crazy, I can't help it."
Oh thankyou lamb for reminding me. I later found out that creativity and imagination actually have no huge part in the frontal lobe and that it is actually the whole left side of the brain while the whole right side of the brain is logic and reasoning. That's usually why when the frontal lobe and amygdala's aren't working the brain focuses more power in the other areas I suppose resulting in usually higher functioning, but not all the time occasionally.
the brain has a certain level of specificity (meaning that to some extent, each part of the brain is responsible for distinctive function), and the orbitofrontal cortex that is thought to be responsible for moral codes (and is dysfunctional among psychopaths) is just a very small part of the frontal lobe.
hi sam. Criminologist here. Alcohol in particular is a potent trigger. It shuts off the rational part of the brain-- frontal lobe, and feels good fast, so they like it. It also helps fuel their fantasies.... They have a tendency to be drug users anyway, because they are thrill seeking and impulsive already
The Paris Commune was brutally repressed, the French state killing 30,000 communists in one day for just demanding suffrage. Same thing in Britain when the Chartists were suppressed. And in 1908 universal suffrage was demanded in Russia, and the Czar sent in the troops opening fire on protesters. He also had 95 union leaders hung from cranes in the Petrograd docks. And the gulags predate communism, the Czar sent political prisoners to labour camps in Siberia - including Stalin.
‘ There’s nobody indentical. Even identical twins are not identical right now’ 'Goverments tend to treat everybody as the same. They have to in a way it’s an even fair application of the law but it violates all the individuality that is really in us and it is very limiting.'
Another thing that keeps us on the straight and narrow, is friends, family and community. You know you don't want to bring shame on your family, you don't want your community to see you as some low-life, you don't want to embarrass your friends. But what if you despise your family, come from a shitty neighborhood, have no friends and got bullied at school - then you don't care about much really. Friends, family and community become a kind of surrogate super ego.
These things likely increase because fame and power increase. Not because of psychopathy. Put any average person in the same situation and I bet they'd give in to plenty of temptations that arise too.
He is similar to Polish actor and satirist Janusz Rewiński who played a rich gangster Siara in popular crime comedy "Kiler" (1997) by Juliusz Machulski. :D
with enough intelligence and a high degree of self-awareness one need not considered psychopathy to be an impediment or disability but rather a superpower .
I disagree with the traumatic childhood event portion. One will do well to remember there are quite a few killers out there who had acceptable childhoods with little to no negativity. Trauma comes in all forms at any age.
I found what I was looking for. It was on the show "Through the wormhole" and the episode was "Can we eliminate evil". Its super interesting and worth watching! Here is part 1 of episode, then you can wathc all 5 parts form there on!
I heard him say the word "maybe" He basically said it was speculation. He did not say that libertarians = psychopaths, he speculated that there may be parallels in brain function of those two groups. As he said though: "It would be worth looking at, I think it would be a fascinating study" "But nobody ever looks at libertarians' brains, that's for sure." Ergo, speculation. P.S. your definition of libertarianism is... lacking, to be sure.
This guy that is in this video was in the video that brought me here. The program covering this story twisted what he said and tried to say that love is unscientific(when in actuality there is a scientific understanding of it). More or less, it was undermining science and they used this guy to do it. Of course the comments on that video had been disabled. Regardless, this guy is smart and the American media proves to be manipulative, again.
Is it possible that a person with genetics that typically lead to a very wonderful and good person but because of an atypical environment grows up to exhibit the symptoms of a psychopath? Can ethics and morality come from another place? Be processed in a different way in the brain? What would cause a person who has no ethics or morality but is also not impulsive but instead highly deliberative?
In the UK recently there was a political scandal. The country was shocked at how MPs were fiddling their expenses. I mean multi-millionaires having their 'Moats' cleaned at taxpayers expense. Others being too stingy to pay for things like a TV or a bath plug. Yet its forgotten only a minority of MPs - around 20% - acted against the spirit of the law and over-claimed. This minority of self-serving criminals seems to run through all walks of life. Its always a minority of bad apples.
The neuroscience is so oversimplified it is hard to relate to what he is saying other than the fact that the environment plays a huge part of the result of the kind of adult we become! So what's new! He overdramatizes the connection between having a risk prone temperament, having been spoiled, and being a psychopath. You could say jerk or bombastic or overly self-centered, self-involved human being, but so was Picasso. Just because your amygdala does not light up in an fMRI does not mean it is not engaged as the threshold for detection by that device requires high levels of engagement. And then there is the PFC which can dampen the amygdala; all work by LeDoux that is well established. What idiot psychiatrists thought it was a good idea to tell this narcissist that he is some borderline psychopath to give him a platform in his old age for talking and talking and talking about himself? What this tells you is that it is post-genetic expression that matters a great deal more in terms of the encoded operational strategies that an individual engages in order to obtain optimal outcomes and that those innate influences get tuned by experience!
Well, all the studies show the opposite. Liberals and Conservatives base their political views more on emotions and Libertarians are more cerebral about their views.
@XCritonX Brains do change in use. However the reason why childhood development is so important is that foundational mental patterns on which all other development is based are physically etched into the brain. How is such a person meant know any other way? And trying to change such foundational mental patterns could be very problematic like trying to kick a bad habit, except that habit involves just ordinary thinking & functioning.
@77Fortran I've heard it's because the so-called warrior gene is x chromosome linked. So a woman has to get the gene from both parents, and the male has to get it from one. Also, as aliciab pointed out gender norms and cultural influences definitely have an effect.
"No profits come from something being worth more than it cost to produce" You've made a breakthrough. So, then - why is something worth more than it costs to produce?
Stalin didn't starve peasants. He deliberately starved Kulaks. Kulaks where squires that rented land from the aristocracy. They exploited peasants, they also stole the land of dead soldiers in WW1. They were hated by the peasantry. When Stalin began collectivizing agriculture, they rebelled - killing livestock and hoarding grain. But the land was never there's, it belonged to the aristocracy. They were challenging the revolution and paid the price.
@kev3d - well, I can certainly agree with the "missing" part of your statement, but wouldn't the "under-developed" portion of it simply refer back to what I said originally?
As a libertarian I do look at problems from a logical standpoint, but not void of emotion or empathy. According to the BIG FIVE my empathy is near the standard of the population. I'm actually a pretty emotional person and can be moved by the joys and sorrows of others even by proxy such as music and film. However, the libertarian movement does have a lot of bigots, especially those that hate Jews... Also a lot of conspiracy nuts. So not sure what a study on libertarians would reveal because they are extremely diverse.
The Kulaks were middle-men tenant farmers. country squires who rented land from aristocrats. Peasants didn't rent land, they were given a few miserly parcels of land to farm for their own use in exchange for their labour. The same feudal system seen across Europe, but particularly brutal in Russia, as Serfdom had only been abolished in the late 19th century. When Stalin collectivized agriculture, the Kulaks wanted none of it so decided to horde grain and kill cattle in protest.
Trouble is, you make so many non-sequiturs. You automatically assume that Eastern Europe would be on a par with Western Europe if not for communism. It never crosses your mind that Russia might have been in the third world without communism. Russia was on a par with the Ottoman Empire in 1917 - a disintegrating feudal Empire, Russia could well have looked like Egypt, Syria, Jordan etc. Militarily weak and economically poor.
well it is now known that not all psychopaths are killers. In fact, most of them are not. And personally, I believe that having a brain of a killer doesnt mean one is a killer. This could sound a little childish, but the heart plays also a big role in the personality of a person. If the heart is sound, the whole body is sound and if the heart is sick, the whole body is sick...
Stalin was born into abject poverty - fact. He attended a seminary to train to be a priest but he was mocked for being a peasant. So then he ran away to join the Communist Party.
Yet even despite all of this, he was married to his high school sweetheart for 50 years, until she sadly passed away from Alzheimer's. Most neurotypical people aren't that lucky. It really does serve as a stunning example of just how important the role of nurturing is in the development of a person.
Most psychopaths aren’t that lucky
Oh, she did die from Alzheimer’s? That was their big fear. Both of her parents died from Alzheimer’s. In fact, that was one of the reason’s they initially did the PET scans of the family. He needed a “normal” control group for a study he was working on (for Alzheimer’s, ironically), but also it was an opportunity to see if her brain showed any signs of the disease. Which it did not at the time.
I wonder what all of this means for their children.
I think I remember he said 80% of the outcome of an individual's psychology has to do with nurture.
@@tatie7604 It depends on the type of outcome. It’s very easy to create a predictable bad outcome consistently in people but the same cannot be said about a good outcome.
BELIEVING a psychopath is their big "win".
Dr. Fallon is to be admired for his total honesty about his ancesters and the psychopathy that runs throughout his family tree. Many Ph.D.'s would not dare share this most personal and private information about themselves, let alone, their family.
Thank you for posting this video.
Agree! I think I only found 3 people with psychopathy who outed themselves.
He didn't care, which proves his case.
"Total Honesty" is your ignorant perception, caused by Ignoring what they "act" like to achieve that "win" from you. I married one ... and I am no longer Ignorant .. I do not Ignore anymore, I Watch, Listen, and Confirm.
They weaponize Trust.
Well hes a psychopath he doesn't get nervous or anxiety or anything like that so why would he not he doesn't have any real real feelings towards anybody else.
I've seen this guy on another programme talking on the same issue. In an interview with his family he asked "would you believe I have these traits" all his family said yes. His mother and brothers all recognised when he was young the unusual emotional reactions he had in comparison to them. When aged 15 he had openly argued at an Aunts funeral that he had a party to go to instead, not bothered by the commotion he was creating for others in favour for his own needs.
Try having siblings who are genetically predisposed to being total callous jackholes.
My grand Aunt cried and told people all about issues with me at a funeral. I said nothing. I thought it odd and off centre.
I loved that he talked about individuality. It's so VERY critical.
Haha, the irony of this comment being predictable.
@@z0uLess this is predictable as well
@@ryanthereaper5032 I think this type of communication is very limited
What’s individuality?
This is one of the most interesting things I've ever seen on reason tv.
I agree. For me, the most interesting part was at 7:55 … where he discusses the possibility of a link between psychopathy and libertarianism.
If you were the golden child you were abused. We just need to expand our definition of abuse. Putting a child on the pedestal is abuse. It does damage to the child in the long run.
I would say most narcissists don’t understand how badly they were damaged by this type of abuse.
🧐 No, I think it depends on the child. In case, of this neuroscientist James Fallon, the care and attention subdued his psychopathic tendencies, which otherwise would’ve expressed very strongly. Did you see his brain map ? 😳
the whole spectrum of narcissism, psychopathy, sociopathy, etc is fuckin fascinating as hell, man
+dudepool :-)
***** I was raised by one
***** Sounds more like sociopath behavior. At least in my experience psychopaths are usually extremely intelligent since the stupid ones end up in prison. Sociopaths usually do stuff for the doing of it where as psychopaths do it for the end goal.
***** Hmm, hard to say. Psychopaths usually don't have children so that maybe another point pointing him towards sociopathy. Or maybe he is just an average man with a short temper, who knows.
***** My mom was more of a narcissistic abuser and once I figured out & confirmed what the hell was going on, I told her to kick rocks. (obviously it was way harder than I'm making it seem, just skipping some of the gory details) Best decision I ever made, though
John Wayne Gacy. I met him as a small child. It was late evening at my grandparents produce stand. My Grandma leaned over and told me, "dont let go of Grandma's hand." We are not a huggy feely family but good to each other. We rounded the corner of the building. There he was buying apples. He looked at her, then stared at me. Eyes a beautiful blue Ice cold. I still feel cold when I think of it. She squeezed my hand. I have wondered to this day is he saw us kids and my cousins playing at the farm behind us. Stalking the farm. I remember she took me into the back room and locked the door. There was no woman I knew as her and the other women of our family. She began to close up NOW and he left with some apples. Latter I would remember here at the house. She double checked all the windows and doors. Barn, informed the help to lock up after they got paid, She was outside a few times before bed. She somehow knew. She just knew. In my life I would meet 7 known killers. I suspect others. I am very very careful. You be careful also.
I have met what i think was a psychopath. He just drained the energy out of people, was very intelligent (maybe smart, cunning is a better description) and there was nothing really there in his eyes. I never really could have a true conversation with him. His motives were always calculated and ice cold, like how a robot would reason.
One could argue if these psychopaths are really human beings. Since what it really means to be human, completely lacks in them. The scary thing is that they are masters in acting like they are normal, but when you have known them for a while, you will find out.
What makes them human is the neo-cortex which is how we separate man from animal. Emotions are irrelevant.
Sydebern It was more likely he was just an aspie
Sydebern Guess how many influential people are like that. They are powerful and dangerous.
You have met many psychopaths and sociopaths. Depending on your definition and where you live, psychopaths represent as much as 4% of the population. That's 1 in 25. You have probably known dozens of psychopaths.
Psychopaths aren't necessarily violent people. Some are, but honestly, there are plenty of law-abiding psychopaths out there. It's a myth that violence & criminality are cornerstone characteristics of psychopaths.
This is fascinating. We are still learning but now have something to go by and work from there for more studies. Thanks for posting this.
Great video, excellent research, and has that ring of truth.
don't beat this guy in scrabble XD
I love him but I can definitely see the narcissism in him.
Yes he's a psychopath and they have no emotions
How do you think? not saying you’re wrong, I’d just like to get more on your perspective if that’s okay?
M J get yourself checked
No you don't.
Please! Just because someone is confident doesn't mean he's a narcissist.
I love the study of neuro-cognition. As a musician, historian, and educator it fascinates me. But I have one problem with this area of study philosophically. It is entirely deterministic. There are people who have the three predispositions of psychopathy (genetics, loss of brain function, and who have suffered abuse) who could have easily become psychopaths, but for some reason did not, and in fact may be living moral lives. The problem with seeing all behaviour as the result of nature and nurture is that it overlooks the idea of free will. The legal system may have the right attitude when it comes to this issue. If a person is solely the result of nature and nurture, how is it moral to hold him accountable for his crime? Psychopaths are not crazy. They do have the ability to distinguish between right and wrong, even if their consciouses do not bother them. As far as I know, neuroscience has not been able to point to the area of the brain that controls free will, but that does not mean that free will does not exist. Neuroscience must make an attempt to account for the existence of free will because often free will is the determinative factor between lawful and criminal behaviour.
This is covered in studies on consciousness. It turns out, our brains are constantly making pre-conscious decisions all the time, so we don't exactly have free will.
👍 @@brittanyp.schaum9507
DETERMINISM 🆚 free will
📺 ua-cam.com/video/vCGtkDzELAI/v-deo.html
(10 minute video | Crash Course)
"our brains are constantly making pre-conscious decisions all the time"
That argument falls far short of proving free will does not exist. In fact it's very weak. Unfortunately, those scientists who desire to negate free will have a bad history of overstating their case with this argument.
The absolute truth is, we do not yet have ANY IDEA how consciousness operates. Until we do, it is fantastically dishonest to make statements like yours, as if the question has been settled.
@@deanray553 👏 you're so true and I always felt that this idea of "you have no free will" must be an oversimplification. But I can't come up with any scientists who'd written or talked about it. It's just Sapolsky everywhere and no opponent. Maybe you know and could recommend somebody? or some articles?
I have watched twenty utube videos by "experts" talking about narcissists and psychopaths. Only two knew clinically how to differentiate ,by DSM, categorically between the two.Fallon is one of them.
Psychopaths are narcissists by default.
Psychopaths are narcissists + other characteristics.
Like impulsivity + disregard & hate rules.
I'm much like James. Very analytical, reason thru everything, 2 plus two equals 4 and always will. I'm even a libertarian as well. But my relationship with people tends to be superficial even with people I love dearly. I can be very charming and a people person when necessary even though I'd prefer not to be. I'm not violent but I could be under the right circumstances like defending myself or a family member. I had a good childhood knowing I was loved and taken care of. Fascinating videos.
Logic takes us no where, but creativity can take us anywhere.
I am such a determinist.
Neuroscience just lays it out in front of you. To avoid it is just putting your head in the sand.
@Madolite I'm no longer a determinist! Haha.
@@hellomate639 why aren’t you a determinist any more? I’m genuinely interested in understanding
@@shrimptyd8059 I'm agnostic about the matter now whereas before I had more made up my mind about it.
I also ended up developing a more open mind about God - or something along those lines because of the hard problem of consciousness, as well as the fact that such an amazing mystery is at the core of why our lives have the possibility of being meaningful in some sense.
It's a short blurb for about 15 years of reasoning/searching, reading the great problems of analytic philosophy, but trying to understand other things as well.
👍 @Terry Hintz
@@hellomate639 , the ability to change one’s mind is a positive sign of intelligence. Good for you.
If you have the time, which part of the following 10 minute video do you happen to disagree with?:
DETERMINISM 🆚 free will
📺 ua-cam.com/video/vCGtkDzELAI/v-deo.html
(10 minute video | Crash Course)
I just realized why Ron Swanson really has that cabin.
My father is exactly like this and spent 22 years as a beloved husband and Pastor and good attentive father to me. It really depends on what traits the psychopaths express not all of them are hollywoods gross version of a violent abuser....some are motivated by things simple as the game of chess
of course i think he chose to be a pastor in order to play this system with churches, taxes, and the laws around that
Hahahaha
I think it depends on the environment they grow up in as well. If they grow up in a loving home, some of them can be very successful.
Yeah, well raised psychopaths are the most powerful human beings imo
How did you learn he was a psychopath?
Fascinating. I'm reminded of the book 'Psychopath!' by Morton Bane or Bain - written by a diagnosed psychopath. Who would know more about the condition than a sufferer?
Just a note: It's the "connections" of the brain, "as in behavior & intelligence" that determines a psychopath within a society (within an enviroment) It's not simply the shape of the brain This would omit a large population of psychopaths especially at corporate or administrative levels (risk & getting away with it)
Example: If a person places their hand into a fire "the brain's connections are different from" a person who would not put their hand in a fire "Behavior & Intelligence" is decisive
Very informative, James Fallon!
He discusses which presidents were more psychopathic here - "Dr. James Fallon Discusses the Traits of Pro-Social (good) Psychopaths." What is interesting is that the factors that made those presidents famous and loved were the traits associated with psychopathy.
i will volunteer for this libertarian brain study.
I guess it's a good thing that this guy feeds his narcissism using the power of knowledge, instead of the power of money or violence.
Doesn't really seem like a narcissist to me......
HipHop, he's simply self-aware enough to function in society. The most intelligent narcissists, sociopaths, & psychopaths can do this.
He is a Narcissist but his pathology isn’t Narcissism. As Psycopaths are Narcissist by default, they act very differently than traditional Narcissists. They are way more manipulative and appear less overtly demanding.
"It just a kind of a quirk."
- Your Honor, hes just a quirky lil' guy!
Thankyou for the feedback too Tanman. Glad to hear from some high functioning people.
Weird and strange people tend to be more intelligent and creative than the masses.
I’d like to hear what he says about female psychopaths
Fascinating...
I think that this is pretty cool stuff to hear talk about. The Brain is magnificent machine.
This guy is very intelligent and he looks so nice on the surface. But I bet he's not faking it, he's fully aware of his psychopathic personality.
He’s fully aware and yet if he gets angry, which you have not seen will unleash his psychopathy and it would not be so nice. And btw he is not nice in this video. He is very aggressive, arrogant and passive aggressive in this video, you just fell for his charm, he uses his education and knowledge to gain trust and his jokes. He is not that nice to people close to him or to people that annoy him which is most people, he also is talking down to everyone
He hasn't got a psychopathic personality. He has some genetic markers that could predicate psychopath behaviour given poor nurturing or extreme circumstances. That has not occurred.
@@kariann3198 Idiotic comment
Dr. James Fallon suggesting that what we thought was universal (government) is actually untenable for human individuality, is unfathomably BASED.
Once the mind is damaged, its extremely difficult to correct. I mean depression for instance can never really be cured. The symptoms can be controlled, but ask depressives whether they are cured and they'll tell you they still have bad days. However, a bad day for a psychopath might see some innocent member of the public badly injured or dead. I mean should we take that risk with serious offenders?
What a fascinating video.
03:25 ..."maybe it can help them." What's the reason for the cutaway shot to this gentleman here? 🤔
conceptional feedback, thankyou.
When you "reason" away conflicts you end up acting really irrational. If you look at John McCafe, who was the libertarian candidate in the election before last, he is intellectually brilliant, but also completely out of his mind.
bon vivant
Noun: A person who enjoys a sociable and luxurious lifestyle.
Thanks!
This is very scary.... 'it will interesting to see what role ultimately neuro-science plays in public policy.'
This will become the scourge of the 21st century.
He gives me hope
A question still harbored by many, is how does a schizoid serial rapist, even multiple murderer, say, end up being overlooked - as many infamous murderers such as Gacy and Dahmer were - as ordinary men with casual charm, but not clear as to them having a type of sociopath personality/neurosis complex or what have you. If that is so, what are the neurological patterns of the people who see such monsters as normal, as opposed to those, who, offhand or not, notice an intrinsic character flaw?
When pleading insanity the question should be whether or not the person had the capability of considering the legal ramifications to their actions.
@Libertarianist Agree. "Did you know you would go to jail if you got caught?" is the only relevant question when deciding ability to stand trial for one's actions. If someone knowingly violates the law, that is the only measure of competence that matters. So lying to investigators, hiding, running from the law, and trying not to get caught for a crime is automatically an indication of rational understanding of the consequences of one's actions and the awareness of violating of the law.
I was told when I was seeking help for my extreme narcissistic tendencies that you will only get so far until you just can't figure out anymore. It's like the god particle you can only Trace it back so far before you have to look at each other and say at this point we just got to leave it until a higher power. This person's theory on people like us is we create a balance. If everybody in that room had good intentions and the same mentality. The world really wouldn't exist because you have to have resistance in order to get a forward motion. Who knows, hopefully when they were able to break through and really identify these things and identify why I know for a fact I was this person before trauma ever happened to me. My furthest back memories are me being this guy and then the trauma happened so it seems like it's timed out almost
Actually one of the problems with psychopaths is they're somewhat not self aware of it.
we need to bring that back so people realize they can stop being crazy by changing their behavior instead of going "wo is me, I'm crazy, I can't help it."
Fascinating!
Oh thankyou lamb for reminding me. I later found out that creativity and imagination actually have no huge part in the frontal lobe and that it is actually the whole left side of the brain while the whole right side of the brain is logic and reasoning. That's usually why when the frontal lobe and amygdala's aren't working the brain focuses more power in the other areas I suppose resulting in usually higher functioning, but not all the time occasionally.
the brain has a certain level of specificity (meaning that to some extent, each part of the brain is responsible for distinctive function), and the orbitofrontal cortex that is thought to be responsible for moral codes (and is dysfunctional among psychopaths) is just a very small part of the frontal lobe.
I would like to know how chemical dependency plays into all of this. If it promotes the actions or causes the impulsevity to be more predominant.
hi sam. Criminologist here. Alcohol in particular is a potent trigger. It shuts off the rational part of the brain-- frontal lobe, and feels good fast, so they like it. It also helps fuel their fantasies.... They have a tendency to be drug users anyway, because they are thrill seeking and impulsive already
greeniem
Thank you Greeniem, I had a feeling it would play a pertinent role in actual acting out their thoughts.
@faithnotneeded If you liked them you might be happy to know they are in the studio recording a new album.
Is there a relation between psychopaths and work-environment?
The Paris Commune was brutally repressed, the French state killing 30,000 communists in one day for just demanding suffrage. Same thing in Britain when the Chartists were suppressed. And in 1908 universal suffrage was demanded in Russia, and the Czar sent in the troops opening fire on protesters. He also had 95 union leaders hung from cranes in the Petrograd docks. And the gulags predate communism, the Czar sent political prisoners to labour camps in Siberia - including Stalin.
Are you responsible for the consequences of your actions.
One of sciences most controversial questions.
I'm so jelly of his book shelf...
Interesting but why the background music?
‘ There’s nobody indentical. Even identical twins are not identical right now’
'Goverments tend to treat everybody as the same. They have to in a way it’s an even fair application of the law but it violates all the individuality that is really in us and it is very limiting.'
Another thing that keeps us on the straight and narrow, is friends, family and community. You know you don't want to bring shame on your family, you don't want your community to see you as some low-life, you don't want to embarrass your friends. But what if you despise your family, come from a shitty neighborhood, have no friends and got bullied at school - then you don't care about much really. Friends, family and community become a kind of surrogate super ego.
It's disturbing when UA-cam videos you remember watching back in the day are almost *12 years old!*
These things likely increase because fame and power increase. Not because of psychopathy. Put any average person in the same situation and I bet they'd give in to plenty of temptations that arise too.
I'd actually like to take one of these tests, where can I find a center to go and get tested?
You can get diagnosed with aspd from a psychiatrist but psychopathy gets almost always diagnosed in prison.
So it's the orbital cortrex and not the prefrontal? Or is the orbital within the prefrontal?
@thruthelookinglass That's a spectacular argument.
Knowing what I know, I would say he is as creepy as hell. I would not recommend getting into an intimate relationship with him.
Fascinating
Perhaps. But why would he be doing an interview with Reason(sic).tv if that were the case?
He is similar to Polish actor and satirist Janusz Rewiński who played a rich gangster Siara in popular crime comedy "Kiler" (1997) by Juliusz Machulski. :D
with enough intelligence and a high degree of self-awareness one need not considered psychopathy to be an impediment or disability but rather a superpower .
There are certainly people who use it to become successful. They might step on a few people on the way though.
I disagree with the traumatic childhood event portion. One will do well to remember there are quite a few killers out there who had acceptable childhoods with little to no negativity. Trauma comes in all forms at any age.
Which?
I found what I was looking for. It was on the show "Through the wormhole" and the episode was "Can we eliminate evil". Its super interesting and worth watching! Here is part 1 of episode, then you can wathc all 5 parts form there on!
Is it really desirable to do so?
I heard him say the word "maybe"
He basically said it was speculation.
He did not say that libertarians = psychopaths, he speculated that there may be parallels in brain function of those two groups.
As he said though: "It would be worth looking at, I think it would be a fascinating study"
"But nobody ever looks at libertarians' brains, that's for sure."
Ergo, speculation.
P.S. your definition of libertarianism is... lacking, to be sure.
This guy that is in this video was in the video that brought me here. The program covering this story twisted what he said and tried to say that love is unscientific(when in actuality there is a scientific understanding of it). More or less, it was undermining science and they used this guy to do it. Of course the comments on that video had been disabled. Regardless, this guy is smart and the American media proves to be manipulative, again.
Was Dr Fallon acting in a criminal minds episode called " OUTFOXED"
We are all individuals, yes!
Is it possible that a person with genetics that typically lead to a very wonderful and good person but because of an atypical environment grows up to exhibit the symptoms of a psychopath?
Can ethics and morality come from another place? Be processed in a different way in the brain?
What would cause a person who has no ethics or morality but is also not impulsive but instead highly deliberative?
What about CRISPR instead of prison in the future to change behaviour?
In the UK recently there was a political scandal. The country was shocked at how MPs were fiddling their expenses. I mean multi-millionaires having their 'Moats' cleaned at taxpayers expense. Others being too stingy to pay for things like a TV or a bath plug.
Yet its forgotten only a minority of MPs - around 20% - acted against the spirit of the law and over-claimed. This minority of self-serving criminals seems to run through all walks of life. Its always a minority of bad apples.
Perhaps reasoning and creativity are located in different parts of the frontal lobe.
@jnjnelson I wholeheartedly agree. In a free society, such laws would not exist.
Interesting stuff!
Its not stuff 😉
The neuroscience is so oversimplified it is hard to relate to what he is saying other than the fact that the environment plays a huge part of the result of the kind of adult we become! So what's new! He overdramatizes the connection between having a risk prone temperament, having been spoiled, and being a psychopath. You could say jerk or bombastic or overly self-centered, self-involved human being, but so was Picasso. Just because your amygdala does not light up in an fMRI does not mean it is not engaged as the threshold for detection by that device requires high levels of engagement. And then there is the PFC which can dampen the amygdala; all work by LeDoux that is well established. What idiot psychiatrists thought it was a good idea to tell this narcissist that he is some borderline psychopath to give him a platform in his old age for talking and talking and talking about himself? What this tells you is that it is post-genetic expression that matters a great deal more in terms of the encoded operational strategies that an individual engages in order to obtain optimal outcomes and that those innate influences get tuned by experience!
@truvelocity The first hurdle in doing this is getting the psychopath to see their behavior as a problem.
what's the name of the area of the brain he mentions in about 1:20?
"with people like Libertarians, we're so logical" lmao
Yeah, I actually think they come up with very illogical justifications for their political views. Or logical but bullshit justifications.
Well, all the studies show the opposite. Liberals and Conservatives base their political views more on emotions and Libertarians are more cerebral about their views.
Nice to meet you, I'm Ted Bundy. I'm also a registered Republican with libertarian views
No. That's liberals. Republicans go with facts.
So, does he mean left-libertarian or right-libertarian?
@XCritonX Brains do change in use. However the reason why childhood development is so important is that foundational mental patterns on which all other development is based are physically etched into the brain. How is such a person meant know any other way? And trying to change such foundational mental patterns could be very problematic like trying to kick a bad habit, except that habit involves just ordinary thinking & functioning.
@77Fortran I've heard it's because the so-called warrior gene is x chromosome linked. So a woman has to get the gene from both parents, and the male has to get it from one. Also, as aliciab pointed out gender norms and cultural influences definitely have an effect.
"No profits come from something being worth more than it cost to produce" You've made a breakthrough. So, then - why is something worth more than it costs to produce?
Theres an actual documentary where he is in it and goes into more detail about sociopaths does anyone know what it is called?
Stalin didn't starve peasants. He deliberately starved Kulaks. Kulaks where squires that rented land from the aristocracy. They exploited peasants, they also stole the land of dead soldiers in WW1. They were hated by the peasantry. When Stalin began collectivizing agriculture, they rebelled - killing livestock and hoarding grain. But the land was never there's, it belonged to the aristocracy. They were challenging the revolution and paid the price.
@kev3d - well, I can certainly agree with the "missing" part of your statement, but wouldn't the "under-developed" portion of it simply refer back to what I said originally?
As a libertarian I do look at problems from a logical standpoint, but not void of emotion or empathy. According to the BIG FIVE my empathy is near the standard of the population. I'm actually a pretty emotional person and can be moved by the joys and sorrows of others even by proxy such as music and film. However, the libertarian movement does have a lot of bigots, especially those that hate Jews... Also a lot of conspiracy nuts. So not sure what a study on libertarians would reveal because they are extremely diverse.
I believe you are quite right
Didn't know Andrew from AMD tech was a neuroscientist as well
The Kulaks were middle-men tenant farmers. country squires who rented land from aristocrats. Peasants didn't rent land, they were given a few miserly parcels of land to farm for their own use in exchange for their labour. The same feudal system seen across Europe, but particularly brutal in Russia, as Serfdom had only been abolished in the late 19th century. When Stalin collectivized agriculture, the Kulaks wanted none of it so decided to horde grain and kill cattle in protest.
Trouble is, you make so many non-sequiturs. You automatically assume that Eastern Europe would be on a par with Western Europe if not for communism. It never crosses your mind that Russia might have been in the third world without communism. Russia was on a par with the Ottoman Empire in 1917 - a disintegrating feudal Empire, Russia could well have looked like Egypt, Syria, Jordan etc. Militarily weak and economically poor.
well it is now known that not all psychopaths are killers. In fact, most of them are not. And personally, I believe that having a brain of a killer doesnt mean one is a killer. This could sound a little childish, but the heart plays also a big role in the personality of a person. If the heart is sound, the whole body is sound and if the heart is sick, the whole body is sick...
Stalin was born into abject poverty - fact. He attended a seminary to train to be a priest but he was mocked for being a peasant. So then he ran away to join the Communist Party.
Yep - we need our psychopaths to protect us from other countries psychopaths.
The judge are pyschopath, political