How can the court force states? The court necessitates cooperation from both the Assembly of States Parties and the United Nations Security Council for its effectiveness. Without such support, the ASP's and the UNSC have failed the victims of these unspeakable atrocities, not the ICC. Not only this, as the prosecutor describes to the interviewer, it is a court of last resort! Where is the international condemnation of these national courts? or national leadership? His point of the court as being one that is no longer fit for its purpose might have weight, however, what is the alternative? No court? No international pressure on the impunity of leaders? It feels unfair and dishonest to blame the ICC for the failure to fight with its hands tied firmly behind its back by the ASP and UNSC.
In America, a prosecutor from Texas cannot tell police who commit police brutality in New York what to do... because it's not their jurisdiction. This is not a concept that is hard to grasp.
Another interesting interview from DW... Would be interesting to see if states in Africa leave the Rome Statute. Even from outsiders view ICC has yet to prosecute a non African state you can see why people think the court is Bias.
They need to talk about crimes happening in Gambia as far as they are aware of before talking about Sudan n others .. our situations is getting from bad to worst in a silence n Muted ways. it is your duty Fatou you a Gambian so without standing for your own peoples would shows no love. Talk to Jmmh to stop the killings n lost of the Gambian citizens🇬🇲
Duterte was right about icc Philippines should really leave
I understand that It's a debate of sorts, but he keeps cutting her off and it's completely unnecessary and disrespectful.
Useless court
The institution has failed us they dont fit the purpose...
How can the court force states? The court necessitates cooperation from both the Assembly of States Parties and the United Nations Security Council for its effectiveness. Without such support, the ASP's and the UNSC have failed the victims of these unspeakable atrocities, not the ICC. Not only this, as the prosecutor describes to the interviewer, it is a court of last resort! Where is the international condemnation of these national courts? or national leadership? His point of the court as being one that is no longer fit for its purpose might have weight, however, what is the alternative? No court? No international pressure on the impunity of leaders?
It feels unfair and dishonest to blame the ICC for the failure to fight with its hands tied firmly behind its back by the ASP and UNSC.
In America, a prosecutor from Texas cannot tell police who commit police brutality in New York what to do... because it's not their jurisdiction. This is not a concept that is hard to grasp.
Tim Sebastian is completely missing the point.
Another interesting interview from DW... Would be interesting to see if states in Africa leave the Rome Statute.
Even from outsiders view ICC has yet to prosecute a non African state you can see why people think the court is Bias.
They need to talk about crimes happening in Gambia as far as they are aware of before talking about Sudan n others .. our situations is getting from bad to worst in a silence n Muted ways. it is your duty Fatou you a Gambian so without standing for your own peoples would shows no love. Talk to Jmmh to stop the killings n lost of the Gambian citizens🇬🇲
He nailed her! Good job sir
why is this guy so bloody aggressive. don't like him at all
This guy is really aggressive and annoying, super hard to watch the video.
there is no impact
mabe she belives in her cause but the minute they tell me we cant touch Tony blare bush obama clinton no thanks
This lady is embarrassing
I believe she still work for Gambian president.
who would have got charles taylor other wise..
i like the guy
fatou u talk true