Absolutely on Target. I was low T and moderate 7.1 PSA - but a staggering Gleeson 10. Followed this formula by getting my T benchmarked and tested prior to surgery after reading "Saving your sex life" and following all the guidelines. I Agree 100% that "T" is not the ugly element in PCa - and stopped all ADT post-surgery. Now monitor PSA and 3 years out - Zero PSA and "normal T" 6 months after ADT stopped. This was strange as I did not have TRT - but "T" was back into normal range? Will now start testing "T" in conjunction with my PSA which I continue to monitor 3 monthly. Thank you for this information - really helpful and informative.
Decades of research and nobody doing huge studies on this is remarkable. All seems pretty obvious to me. Of course your psa is not accurate if your a cancer survivor and your testosterone hasn’t recovered.
Absolutely on Target. I was low T and moderate 7.1 PSA - but a staggering Gleeson 10. Followed this formula by getting my T benchmarked and tested prior to surgery after reading "Saving your sex life" and following all the guidelines. I Agree 100% that "T" is not the ugly element in PCa - and stopped all ADT post-surgery. Now monitor PSA and 3 years out - Zero PSA and "normal T" 6 months after ADT stopped. This was strange as I did not have TRT - but "T" was back into normal range? Will now start testing "T" in conjunction with my PSA which I continue to monitor 3 monthly. Thank you for this information - really helpful and informative.
Very informative
🙏🙏🙏💪🤘👍🙏🙏🙏
Decades of research and nobody doing huge studies on this is remarkable. All seems pretty obvious to me. Of course your psa is not accurate if your a cancer survivor and your testosterone hasn’t recovered.
"Equivocal"???
He probably meant "equivalent", "similar" or "comparable".
Yes, that's a word in the medical field.
@@EmranAskari No, he didn't. But it means equivalent. It is just a snooty way we in healthcare say things. LOL.
open to more than one interpretation; ambiguous.
"the equivocal nature of her remarks"