Charlie Rose 2001 w Christianne Kubrick, Jan Harlan & Martin Scorsese

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 14 лют 2015
  • Charlie Rose Kubrick Special 2001
  • Розваги

КОМЕНТАРІ • 111

  • @nickwernham
    @nickwernham 9 років тому +19

    What a terrific interview. So nice to hear a bit about Kubrick's family life and to see hear about his lighter side.

    • @Purrete
      @Purrete 8 років тому +4

      +Nick Wernham Let me give you some more little nuggets; Christiane and Ian Harlan are brothers as Harlan is Christiane's maiden name. Both are children of a brother to Veit Harlan who 1937, Joseph Goebbels had appointed as one of his leading propaganda directors. His most notorious film was Jud Süß ,one of the very few movies prohibited in many countries until today for its virulent and twisted depiction of Jews.

  • @roedalacket
    @roedalacket 9 років тому +16

    This thing is wonderful.

  • @aidanfilms702
    @aidanfilms702 8 років тому +12

    This is so amazing. Scorsese and Kubrick are some of the biggest influences on my life.

  • @taldoron4966
    @taldoron4966 6 років тому +6

    His films are the best example of one directors obsessive - all encompassing - immersion in every aspect of his work. He was the great gnome of modern cinema. Hidden away in St. Albans he would labour for years on each film, each one finally emerging as a polished and wholly unique jewel.

  • @LenHummelChannel
    @LenHummelChannel 8 років тому +8

    Kubrick, Orson Welles, Peter Sellers, and Peter Ustinov. - genius that I find endlessly fascinating. Thank you for uploading this. definitely worth watching.
    Kubrick was always searching for answers, ... and perfection of the internal meaning of a moment.

  • @ethanbradley2089
    @ethanbradley2089 4 роки тому +6

    Scorsese was a great choice for this. He's always been Kubrick's child, the same way David Chase is to Scorsese. It's what I love about film. There's a natural evolution that you can follow.

  • @jfjvhgsieofl
    @jfjvhgsieofl 8 років тому +15

    I love Martin Scorsese. Not only is he one of the greatest directors of all time, every bit Kubrick's equal, but he's an absolute champion of the art of cinema, and has somehow retained the ability to be a fan, as well as a supreme artist. He has resurrected so many careers of directors and films that have been forgotten in present times, and is there when needed to speak about great artists and lend his name as a spokesman for their credence and value to film as an art form. I can think of no other director who has done as much for the art of film, and who has remained as humble. I doubt 'Raging Bull', 'Taxi Driver', 'Goodfellas', 'Mean Streets', 'Last Temptation', 'After Hours' or 'The Age of Innocence' will ever lose their standing as masterpieces, but if they do, I hope some great modern director comes forth as he has done to educate the serious filmgoer of these important contributions to the art form of cinema.

  • @aidanfilms702
    @aidanfilms702 8 років тому +38

    His wife is a very charming lady even at that age and I'm 22.

    • @konykonfilms1099
      @konykonfilms1099 7 років тому +1

      Aidan Smith SOOO !!!

    • @kingamoeboid3887
      @kingamoeboid3887 6 років тому +1

      Aidan Smith she was 25 when she was in Paths Of Glory.

    • @subversivelysurreal3645
      @subversivelysurreal3645 5 років тому +3

      Aidan Smith : I would chalk that up to her intellect.
      Not to contradict the fact that she is beautiful.

    • @villll
      @villll Рік тому

      thought the same and I’m 22 as well 😎

  • @somethingaboutthemovies5116
    @somethingaboutthemovies5116 8 років тому +11

    Scorsese talking about The Shining in presence of Jan Harlan. OMG.

  • @Bryan8329
    @Bryan8329 8 років тому +4

    Glad to see this online.

  • @tiffsaver
    @tiffsaver Рік тому +1

    One of the finest interviews on anyone, on any subject, that I have ever seen, and I'm 74-years old. Rose wisely selected the "Holy Trinity" of guests here, the wife, the director, and the producer, using this remarkable triumvirate to create real conversational magic.

  • @September2004
    @September2004 7 років тому +15

    Favorite moments (for my reference):
    23:53 : Schedule for Eyes Wide Shut originally 24 weeks.
    30:32 : Daily newspaper was the NY Times.
    43:26 : Love of all sorts of films.
    43:59 : Saw films where he was embarrassed being caught seeing them.
    51:41 : Wondering why he couldn't knock films out faster.

    • @kingamoeboid3887
      @kingamoeboid3887 7 років тому

      jessc1979 Where in the video are mentions of A Clockwork Orange.

    • @villll
      @villll Рік тому

      cool you did this

  • @Buzzdog1971
    @Buzzdog1971 7 місяців тому +1

    This interview is relevant 11/6/2023.

  • @daxxkid101
    @daxxkid101 7 місяців тому

    Marty shaking his head when Jan said how much Kubrick enjoyed his films. So talented yet so humble about his work.

  • @subversivelysurreal3645
    @subversivelysurreal3645 5 років тому +6

    Stanley Kubrick was not a ‘Chess-Hustler’.
    He never pretended to be a fourth rate player who won by a
    stroke of luck. He played for money, as did several men. He earned
    two to three dollars a day.

  • @saigokun
    @saigokun 7 років тому +4

    Thanks for posting this.

  • @sellout87
    @sellout87 8 років тому +18

    watching martin scorsese at 13:15 over and over.

    • @Vibeagain
      @Vibeagain 2 роки тому

      Yes

    • @Vibeagain
      @Vibeagain 2 роки тому

      Well I disagree that brilliance can't be described, and Scorsese is just the man to do it. In fact, hes the only one generous enough to do so

  • @atila_santos
    @atila_santos 8 років тому +4

    This is amazing.

  • @jordanrioscreations
    @jordanrioscreations 9 років тому +13

    I wish Charlie Rose would just let some of the conversations continue to play out naturally rather than always interjecting with a random question.

    • @Purrete
      @Purrete 8 років тому +6

      +Jordan Rios Yes, it's like he is trying to get to the same level with those biggies he's interviewing. He can only do the asking while the others do concrete, impressive and long lasting stuff, like a Steve Jobs, Woody Allen or Noam Chomsky.

    • @jordanrioscreations
      @jordanrioscreations 8 років тому +6

      Purrete Well, yeah, that too is a bit annoying. He sort of comes off like he considers his work of interviewing people for a living to be of the same value as the work of the people he interviews. There is a pretentiousness there.

    • @subversivelysurreal3645
      @subversivelysurreal3645 5 років тому +3

      Jordan Rios : I was amazed by how ill-prepared #CharlieRose
      was. He asked very silly questions such as, “How did he most exasperate you?”
      I think that his wife answered them beautifully.
      He’s simply not a very bright person, Charlie Rose.
      I find the fact that he edited himself so incredibly interesting.

  • @richardbain8746
    @richardbain8746 8 років тому +45

    Does anybody like Path's Of Glory i think it is superb film making!

    • @windh
      @windh 8 років тому +7

      It's brilliant, yes.

    • @tomnovak9658
      @tomnovak9658 7 років тому +2

      It's one of my top three behind Kane and Touch of Evil. He never topped it. In a lot of his movies the people are lifeless, flat. Paths of Glory is drenched in humanity.

    • @kingamoeboid3887
      @kingamoeboid3887 7 років тому

      Richard Bain I'll watch it. A Clockwork Orange (1971) is my personal favourite Kubrick film. I loved Malcolm McDowell in the film. He was handsome, charismatic and pretty talented when he played as Alex at 27.

    • @subversivelysurreal3645
      @subversivelysurreal3645 5 років тому +2

      Richard Bain : I loved it! It was such an interesting
      way to take a look at the Despicable nature of war.
      I loved the juxtaposition of these self-important
      professionals of organized slaughter inside these
      ostentatious, artful rooms.
      There is an hour long interview with Kubrick available
      now. Kubrick is of course completely candid, and his observations utterly
      fascinating, whatever he’s explaining.
      The hour slips by very quickly.

    • @zlodrim9284
      @zlodrim9284 4 роки тому

      Terrific film. The ending always makes me cry.

  • @dwdeclare1965
    @dwdeclare1965 7 років тому

    thank you for uploading this.

  • @OriginalRocketJock
    @OriginalRocketJock 9 років тому +5

    Jeez, Charlie Rose looked like a 95 year old fifteen years ago.

  • @tonywords6713
    @tonywords6713 7 років тому +2

    just because a movie deals with the subject of war does not automatically make it a 'war movie' or even 'about' war .

  • @thewilythylacine
    @thewilythylacine 9 років тому +2

    It was great to see this again.

    • @Bryan8329
      @Bryan8329 8 років тому +4

      +thewilythylacine Indeed. I watched this and taped it (back in the waning days of VHS, and before DVR was more commonplace). At the time I was obsessed with 2001: A Space Odyssey and had quite the interest in Kubrick. Quite moving watching Scorsese visibly moved himself when Harlan is talking about how much Kubrick admired him and Woody Allen as New York directors.

    • @scattjax3908
      @scattjax3908 7 років тому +3

      28:44 That Is a great moment when Scorsese shakes his head, like his admiration & modesty won't let him believe it.

  • @NoPainNoGain200
    @NoPainNoGain200 6 років тому +4

    A horrible gossip I love him!

  • @jeanvuvu6900
    @jeanvuvu6900 5 років тому +1

    Christiane and Jan talk Absolutely in the same way 😁😁

  • @JacksonKillroy
    @JacksonKillroy Рік тому

    Christianne Kubrick, what a fantastic, intelligent woman

  • @sangeovr
    @sangeovr 2 роки тому

    That was great

  • @watermelonlalala
    @watermelonlalala 6 років тому +2

    15:08 2001, the computer did not malfunction. That is what I always thought until I read so many times that the computer had gone insane. Then I came to think so, too.

  • @maniravandi5983
    @maniravandi5983 3 роки тому

    Interviews back then was much better

  • @subversivelysurreal3645
    @subversivelysurreal3645 5 років тому +1

    I hope that this is helpful.
    Blaine Gonzales has posted on You Tube an hour long interview of
    Stanley Kubrick, titled simply “Rare 1-hour Stanley Kubrick Interview’.
    I hope that everyone who hasn’t heard it enjoys it.

  • @timespace.productions7513
    @timespace.productions7513 8 років тому +4

    Cruise in The Color of Money is the shit! So weird & eccentric...

    • @Johnconno
      @Johnconno Рік тому

      'Shit' is very accurate.

  • @oliveiraluis3540
    @oliveiraluis3540 8 років тому +4

    "...what men cannot never know and what women will know men can never know..." is that it at 21.00min? very good...

  • @giancarlogonzalesdelvalle5150
    @giancarlogonzalesdelvalle5150 7 місяців тому +1

    No Peace No Quiet = Only Torture Consequences SCK

    • @giancarlogonzalesdelvalle5150
      @giancarlogonzalesdelvalle5150 7 місяців тому +1

      Torture Consequences = “the chair 🪑 “ Torture Room🪑 = Physical Torture consequences 2118 World 🗺️ War 3 Project Mayhem War + All Hell Debts* 🪑Taxes =🩸= payMENts only 🪑

    • @giancarlogonzalesdelvalle5150
      @giancarlogonzalesdelvalle5150 7 місяців тому +1

      🪑🪑🪑🪑🪑🪑🪑🪑🪑🪑

  • @watermelonlalala
    @watermelonlalala 6 років тому +1

    I've watched EWS at least 300 times ( the dvd goes into automatic repeat). I hate to hear Scorsese talk about it. I do not "like" the movie but there is something about it that makes me watch it again.

    • @_FMK
      @_FMK 4 роки тому

      Hi Brendan, I've also watched EWS many times (*perhaps 150 odd). Did you perhaps notice that in the walk-in wardrobe - during the initial undressing scene - that the wardrobe doors are different (near floor level) when Bill is later in there looking for his wallet?

  • @jedaaa
    @jedaaa 7 років тому +2

    why do all episodes of charlie rose look like they were filmed 70 years ago... this is only from 2001...

    • @TheJnatch
      @TheJnatch  7 років тому +2

      this is was copied on vhs, then transferred to another vhs and then digitized and then uploaded, so its my fault

  • @watermelonlalala
    @watermelonlalala 6 років тому +1

    I thought Kubrick said "You found me in a cupboard."

  • @thedude4795
    @thedude4795 4 роки тому

    How about some reference to the actual documentary?
    Stanley Kubrick: A Life in Pictures

  • @h.hickenanaduk8622
    @h.hickenanaduk8622 Рік тому

    Hey here's a neat trick, edit the ads off the front end. 2:40

    • @TheJnatch
      @TheJnatch  Рік тому

      It's 45 seconds H, you can handle it. And don't be so sarcastic to people, it comes across as ugly. This is public television, those were more like sponsor announcements embedded in the program, as opposed to a commercial break. It's a "neat trick" that they do.

  • @timespace.productions7513
    @timespace.productions7513 8 років тому +2

    There's something lost in Eyes Wide Shut, because Tom Cruise is the lens of subtlety in the storytelling. When I imagine the movie w/a different lead, the premise lights up w/infinite possibilities. Of course, this is my opinion. I believe there are only a handful of roles Cruise can personify. He's not a character-actor like Gary Oldman. But when the casting fits, or the premise yields such a weight of personality, Tom Cruise is more than worthy of his accolades. When he's good or better, he's the best. When he's average, he's worse than most. & it's all about the casting. Cruise's limits are obvious.

    • @scattjax3908
      @scattjax3908 7 років тому +2

      Interesting point. Do you have a replacement in mind?

  • @MartinSage
    @MartinSage 6 років тому +2

    There is a Kubrick "look" to his films....a signature. Spielberg should have been there instead of Marty.

  • @Rahoorkhuitable
    @Rahoorkhuitable 5 років тому

    I wish Kubrick would´ve made A.I.,I wish Kubrick had made a movie about the tarot.....

  • @MartinSage
    @MartinSage 6 років тому +2

    I always laugh when people say Stanley was a perfectionist. I loved him but I can point out Dozens of Errors in set design and continuity of shooting in each of his films. Even so he made magical films.

    • @strangersound
      @strangersound 6 років тому +6

      How do you know these were errors and not intentional? The Shining is known for purposely having all kinds of set design and continuity errors, on purpose, to agitate the subconscious of the viewer. 2001 also has many. This was a major feature in some of his works. Perhaps you are the one who has made an error in your assessment?

  • @williamgregory1848
    @williamgregory1848 4 місяці тому

    Kubrick bordered on genius and lunatic

  • @curciowest
    @curciowest 8 років тому +1

    I don't do commercials.

    • @TheJnatch
      @TheJnatch  8 років тому +1

      huh?

    • @phizap
      @phizap 7 років тому +1

      neither do we, that's why we have adblock

    • @reginaldbraithewaite5833
      @reginaldbraithewaite5833 7 років тому +1

      Then you can do us all a favor by taking the time to carefully edit them out.

    • @TheJnatch
      @TheJnatch  7 років тому +1

      you dont get how it works apparently, the source material has no commercials

    • @reginaldbraithewaite5833
      @reginaldbraithewaite5833 7 років тому

      +J Willoughby: That doesn't mean the poster had access to the primary source. A secondary source from which the OP's vid was copied might have added the commercials. Besides which, post-privatization PBS does contain commercials during fund drives.

  • @Johnconno
    @Johnconno Рік тому

    I thought Marty changed his mind about becoming a priest?

  • @alexokin6819
    @alexokin6819 3 роки тому

    Charlie rose tryna tip us off on amazon stock when we had a chance to put in some money to invest in being someone who has all the money to sit in their house watching movies maybe funding or directing their own , while lovely wonderful items magically arrive at their house , well sheit

  • @camarocarl7130
    @camarocarl7130 3 роки тому +2

    These Charlie Rose interviews would be so much better without Charlie Rose.

  • @huskvnj
    @huskvnj 7 років тому +2

    is Charlie Rose drunk?!

  • @DennisMHenderson
    @DennisMHenderson 3 роки тому +2

    Charlie rose is absolutely unbearable

  • @theesotericcunt5029
    @theesotericcunt5029 7 років тому +1

    Lol @ 70 being young. As an example, Percy Bysshe Shelley died at 29. If 70 is young then what's 29? Only people over 60 think dying at 70 is dying young.

    • @scattjax3908
      @scattjax3908 7 років тому +2

      I think what he means is dying at 70 for Kubrick in particular is too young because he wanted him to make more films. I like your name, you obscure vagina :)

  • @eanayac
    @eanayac 4 роки тому

    Kubrick didn’t even like Scorsese’s films, he never rated any of Scorsese’s films as his favorites! Wrong director there... They should have invited someone Kubrick admired, like Coppola...

    • @plasticweapon
      @plasticweapon 2 роки тому +1

      also, scorsese at his best (and he was great in his prime) is no kubrick. and contrary to what people here are saying, they have nothing in common as filmmakers.

  • @panagiotisdedes7975
    @panagiotisdedes7975 6 років тому +1

    Kubrick didn't like Scorsese
    Don't know why but I think he was a bit jealous of him

    • @TheJnatch
      @TheJnatch  6 років тому +2

      source?

    • @panagiotisdedes7975
      @panagiotisdedes7975 6 років тому +1

      My mind.he didn't list any of Scorsese movies as his favourites.that says something

    • @panagiotisdedes7975
      @panagiotisdedes7975 6 років тому +1

      Kubrick's Tube I'm a kubrick fan dont get me wrong it's just my opinion.in his top list it's not even one scorsese movie and that's wierd.goodfellas and taxi driver are masterpieces

    • @ethanbradley2089
      @ethanbradley2089 4 роки тому +3

      His wife says otherwise in this interview.

    • @plasticweapon
      @plasticweapon 2 роки тому

      i see not even kubrick is safe from YoU'rE jUsT jEaLoUs

  • @cschulzke26
    @cschulzke26 7 років тому +3

    Love Kubrick, but lets face it, EWS sucked big time. I think even Kubrick disliked it.

    • @roxman49
      @roxman49 7 років тому +4

      EWS, in my opinion, is his best film. So many layers to the story that it's all just overwhelming.

    • @delerium2k
      @delerium2k 7 років тому +6

      EWS was among his best... Although all of his films were among his best. There's rumor that WB edited out some critical scene from the final cut (he died a few months before its release). There's also rumor he was killed over that film. Whatever the truth, can you imagine he was still making films today with current CGI capabilities? Damn

    • @panagiotisdedes7975
      @panagiotisdedes7975 6 років тому +2

      delerium2k except fear and desire.that was awful

    • @thunderpeel2001
      @thunderpeel2001 4 роки тому +1

      Kubrick died believing it was his best film

    • @plasticweapon
      @plasticweapon 2 роки тому

      revisionism aside, it's his worst film.