Russian billioneirs lie to you Brits thousand times, and you don't mind, money doesn't smell...dies it?.... It's all fine and dandy. No doubt that interview of Diana broushed counter direction many potentates and their intententions with its naked truth. That's why 25 years since, you are so keen on "finding the truth" about this fateful interview. Yes, Bashir was wrong to sly his way into the interview, but it's a much lesser evil than what is going on in "the establishment" and what was done to person Diana Spencer by that establishment.
Even though what he did to get her to do the interview was absolutely disgusting, this interview needed to be made. You could just tell she's held it all in for so long. And she also opened up about topics such as self harm, eating disorders and depression, things that weren't very talked about at the time. It must've meant a lot to people going through similar things. She told the truth. She needed to be heard.
Gotta love all these people who either werent born then or little kids telling how it was in the 80s and 90s...We talked about eating disorders, domestic violence, date rape...I gave public workshops on them in schools and clinics as a therapist...Everywhere from 1993-97...zz..Stick with what you know and what you remember...
@@stephaniesimpson1150 How incredibly rude! Did you conduct these workshops with the same guessing you have here? I have yet to read where anyone has disclosed their age for you to know whether they were born during the 80s and 90s. Not to mention there are people from other locations and countries who didn't openly speak on such topics. The U.K. certainly did not. Diana, because she was in the position of The Princess of Wales, she made enormous contributions to how AIDS was viewed and educated people on it so that they could not catch it from touching someone. She changed the perception of how people looked at the homeless. All these topics and issues existed, but the perception was very different in HOW they were looked upon. Let go of your arrogance, and you might become open to actually learning something. Then you may have something of value to contribute!
Somehow brains are so damaged these days that this spellcasting suggestion causes their weak minds to somehow ignore or dismiss OBVIOUS TRUTH. The queen reptilian child torturing, sacraficing, blood drinking murder of multitudes and Diana is DEAD..in hell
@@MariaHernandez-rc2eq or... she spoke out loud about how she felt based on her husbands actions. I am pretty sure there is no such thing as getting married becoming a princess, having half the world watch your every move and then to find out your husband loves his mistress and certain ppl in his family thinks its ok and theres nothing to be done about it. Clearly ones mental health or behaviour would only go south!
@@WhD2024 It was very controversial. Some people believed she was telling the truth. Some believed she was mentally unstable. Others believed she was lying and trying to undermine Charles and the monarchy.
@@karlamccullough5319 he shouldn't have had an affair, had he been loyal to his WIFE, she wouldn't have had reason to "air out dirty laundry" he shouldn't even be King, and Camilla sure as heck shouldn't be Queen. How could they? Knowing they continued their affair while he was still married to the Real Queen Diana
@@kamayisidore6098 Dian was not the queen. If people were barred from being monarchs because of adultery, there wouldn't be a king or queen in hte world.
@@glen7318 i agree. She used their protection services as she didnt trust royal ones but they turned out to be rubbish. She used dodi to make the doctor cardioligist boy friend jealous dr hassat. All very peculiar
No it wasn't authentic. She had set out to stab not only Charles but the entire Royal Family in the back because she was full of vengeance. That was her nature. Even if you are unhappy in a marriage you don't try to bring your husbands entire family down. Also what about the effect of this interview on her sons. Charles is their father and the Royal Family are their family. Anyway several of Diana's staff including her Private Secretary resigned the day after this interview aired. They had finally had enough. By the way Diana had screened every question before the interview and had rehearsed all of her answers.
@@marigold6920 I am quite sure if you were "tricked" into a marriage with a husband in love with someone else you have literally nothing in common with and then completely dismissed because you are preferred by the public, so you are undermined and judged for your every move would put you on the edge. I can see why as she evolved from desperately trying to get Prince Charles to love her, to giving up on that never happening and trying to find someone who would love her while he carried on with Camilla, and continuing to stay married to finally feeling the anger at the betrayal and her life being hell in such a miserable marriage. Diana never ever criticized the Queen or The Duke of Edinburgh. She stayed committed to the Crown and the monarchy since it was the future of her sons. Who she did criticize and stand up to head-on was who she called the Palace "grey coats". GOOD FOR HER!! When you are under the pressure she was under and being deceived the way she was, you would be desperate in wanting your story told. Bashir should be in jail. He has a direct hand that led to her death. Think of how if he hadn't played on her vulnerability and paranoia at the time, the interview never would have happened she and Charles may have made some "arrangement" to co-exist in their marriage, and Harry would e a different person and on a better path. So if you are going to blame the victim in this for her own death, come up with better contributions than " Diana had screened every question before the interview and had rehearsed all of her answers" as though that is a reason for someone to die......
Absolutely. She said her truth and just like back then the RF are falling over themselves to try to silence her voice. There area always the royal sycophants who also will defend the RF no matter what they do.
@@EMG-pi4cb I am not a Royal sycophant. I don't like Charles politics for a start. But there were two sides to this story and Charles has never been allowed to speak out. Even if he could he wouldn't out of respect for his children!
@@user-xe5cz3dw8m Diana died because she and Dodi went tare arsing out of the Ritz in the middle of the night, trying to outrun the Paparazzi. If they had stayed the night at the Ritz as planned she might still be alive today. Also if she had not ditched her Royal Protection she would have been protected. Unfortunately Diana and Dodi were very foolish and irresponsible that night which lead to their demise.
Weirdly though, watching it real time from New Zealand when this interview happened , no one my age (I'm a couple of years younger than Diana) thought it that shocking. Riveting yes, very much a story that needed to be told, but no big deal in the scheme of our lives. Why is it being buried? Princess D had a right to be heard and it does feel like a burying of history that we can't watch the original interview now. There was no real judgement at the time either, just life unfolding.
Sharing the family dirty laundry with the public is against royal protocol. The BBC Panorama interview was an act of disloyalty to the monarchy. The interview was intended to hurt and undermine Charles. Diana's reputation was tarnished by the tabloid reports of her affairs. The tabloids labeled Diana a home wrecker. She was angry at Charles and wanted to destroy Charles's reputation. In 1994 Charles publicly confessed his marriage was irretrievably broken down by 1986 and that's when he renewed his intimate relationship with Camilla in 1986. Charles was responding to the 1993 Camillagate scandal. James Hewitt's first book about his affair with Diana was published in 1994. Diana and her lovers usually denied their affairs. She couldn't deny her affair with Hewitt after his book was published. Charles's confession and Hewitt's book added credibility to the tabloid reports of Diana's affairs. Diana had very little privacy because the paparazzi hung out around Kensington palace 24 hours a day and reported on her affairs. Charles and Diana informally separated in 1986. They were officially separated in 1992. Why blame Camilla in 1995? I believe Diana was being defensive and blamed Camilla to divert attention away from her affairs. Diana wanted public support and sympathy. The interview is very biased and one-sided. Diana said what she wanted people to believe and it wasn't fully truthful.
EXACTLY! This is nothing more than the Royal Family trying to erase her and raise Charles and Camilla's profile. The point was not HOW the interview was obtained. Plenty of journalists scam their way into interviews. I'm not saying it is morally okay, but it does NOT change what she said and THAT is what is important. The Royal Family has been trying to figure out how to get rid of this interview for years because it tells the truth and they want Charles to start his reign with a clean slate and want Diana forgotten and Camilla's reputation covered up.
8:37 "There is no better way to dismantle a personality than to isolate it. "...the line that touched the heart of mine although I'm an Indian... I can understand how much pain she was in, and she definitely knew that the entire family in which she was engaged had gone against her
She forgot to mention how she attempted to isolate Charles personality in the early years of the marriage. Making him sack 40 long term and loyal members of his staff (because she didn't like them!) Kicking up a stink everytime he saw his own friends and forcing him to give up most of his friends to hang out with her own younger friends! Even making him give away his beloved old Labrador because she thought the dog was smelly! She made such fuss everytime he wanted to do something for himself like go our horseriding or stalking or hiking with his family at Balmoral! She would literally threaten to harm herself or throw her wedding ring on the ground. Emotional blackmail no less! These are the behaviours which dismantle another person's personality! Typical narcissist behaviour!
No matter what you are selling us, this interview was groundbreaking. Take just one single aspect, the bulimia. Diana did so much for those affected AND those close to them. We all knew someone who fought that battle, we all learned a lot that helped us. Not just those directly affected. I find it revealing that this entire story is reducing to the "Well, there were three of us in this marriage" and never mention one single aspect of what she said besides this one sentence. She said a lot and gladly nowadays these men who rule the world so badly can't erase the content of this important interview. Not anymore.
Yes absolutely. And I think the sad thing is Prince William lives in denial. Like surely enough he must realise his mother was screwed over by his father. Really really badly and it was a good thing she gave this interview. But instead it’s like he wanted to bring Bashir down instead of looking at the positives
The thing with Diana, and as far as I'm aware it has never been confirmed, but if she had the rumored affair with former England Rugby Captain Will Carling, which may have led to the break of his marriage to his ex-wife Julia. If there is any truth in it then I'd lose all or any sympathy that I may have had for the late Princess. It just gets me that a person, who had been cheated on by her husband and went through all the misery that it brought on her, then pretty much goes on TV and conducts an interview where it's clear she's attempting to illicit sympathy would put another woman through the same thing. Again though, I'm not saying it necessarily is true but if it was I feel it puts her in a more damning light.
@@robertmcelwaine7024 It's complicated. Diana had 8 or more affairs before the divorce was final in 1996. Some of her affairs were with married men and the tabloids labeled Diana a home wrecker. Diana caused Will Carling's divorce. She tried to break up Oliver Hoare's marriage. Her bodyguard Barry Mannakee was married. Dodi was engaged to Kelly Fisher when Diana became involved with him. Diana knowingly hurt other women. Diana was the adulterous other woman in their marriages/relationships. In the Peter Settelen video called Diana Revealed, Diana admitted Charles was faithful until 1986. I suspect Diana blamed Camilla for the problems in the marriage to divert attention away from the reports of Diana's affairs. Diana was not a Saint. The BBC Panorama interview was intended to hurt and undermine Charles. Diana was not a Saint.
@@robertmcelwaine7024She had affairs with other married men. When Oliver Hoare refused to leave his wife after ending an affair with her she bombarded his home with malicious calls.
@funtimefranky Oliver or his wife requested a police investigation. It was determined Diana made over 300 crank phone calls to his home from her cell phone and two phone boxes near Kensington palace. The police threatened to charge Diana with harassment if she didn't stop. There was a cover-up to keep the story out of the news. The investigating police officers eventually told the story. Diana had admitted to a friend that she was driving over to Oliver's house in the middle of the night and phoned him, waited for the lights to come on and then hung up. Diana was 32 or 33 and behaved like a lovesick teenager.
It was a tragic death end for Diana and so many people took advantage of her vulnerability. Charles is a horrible person, I don't know how he can live with himself. Many of us will never forget how he treated Diana, even if he is now the king. The only good thing is that we were able to hear from Diana's mouth her truth and how she felt. The best thing Prince Harry did was walk away.
He did do wrong, but at the same time, he was pushed into an arranged marriage with her when he was in love with someone else. I think the institution of the monarchy did them both wrong, but it did much more damage to Diana because she was an outsider and a woman
So many want to come down on Harry for getting out but can you blame him? There’s prerequisites around every corner for anything pertaining to any type of life normalcy. You’re born into a family that is referred to as the “institution” for goodness sakes. Every word and step you take is monitored and analyzed. I don’t put one ounce of blame on Harry for escaping and I would go so far to say that he knew Markle was his way out but what people need to remember is he’s still the kind hearted philanthropist his mother raised and no one can take that away and he’s still following through with his most dear charities. It’s as if no one escapes this life without an attempt at submission to their ways and rules but then without all that there wouldn’t be a monarchy would there? It’s becoming less and less necessary and more of just a London circus to visit when traveling. Think about it.
It puts into question other projects of Martin Bashir, and it makes him look very manipulative and skirmy, unethical, and who was he working for?--However; in spite of that, Diana was able to speak...this revelation merely taints the whole narrative.... but I believe her, and it just underscores that you can trust no one.
At the end of the day she accomplished her goal and that was to get her message out. Diana knew exactly what she was doing when those cameras started rolling. Not just a pretty face 🥰
@@guestguest5128 So what? Nobody in their right mind wants to "fill Diana's shoes" For that you have to have many lovers, and break up many marriages, you have to be a very hypocritical and very false person. You have to cry in front of the public with an innocent face while in private you are an immoral person who has sex with single and *MARRIED* men. Nobody wants to be that!
Mommy tells Charlie to get married, Mommy tells Charlie to get divorced. Charlie always did what Mommy said, until he became king, then he ignored her directive. He's pathetic.
what nonsnese are you talkng? Charles could nt marry without his mother's permission and she also dissuaded him from divorce until things got very bad.
Had Charles loved and respected Diana and not had it off with Camilla, the interview would have never happened. Diana would still be alive and would be Queen. Instead we have the ugliest Queen on Earth.
@@peachygal4153 what is the point? Charles could not marry like an ordinary man, he had to get the queen's permission or go to Parliament. He was also persuaded to stay in his bad marriage for years... becuase of duty to the crown
Rest In Peace, princess Di. You are the queen of hearts ♥️, even beyond the borders of your island. We got a little glimpse of your pain, and that made you more human, brought you closer to us and farther from the institution.
No, it was a half truth! When Diana said "we were always 3 in this marriage" she insinuated that Carlos and Camilla had always been together, and that is false... Well yes, in her soul they had always been together. My grandmother died 15 years ago and is still with me. Bashir continued to press her and she had no choice but to admit that Charles returned with Camilla in 1985. The prince returned with Camilla in 1985, after learning of Diana's affair with Mannakee, a married bodyguard with two little girls. pd:Watch the full interview, not just the short one they always put on to sell the story of the "eternal victim"
@@nelixsulu6201 Diana could lie without batting an eyelid. Everyone knew this. Remember when she was asked about the nuisance calls to Oliver Hoare? " She had been accused of making hundreds of calls. It was in the newspapers back in the day. In this interview Diana said she only made a dozen or so calls! She lied. Ken Wharfe her Bodyguard confirmed that Diana had made hundreds of calls. He had to tail her every night when she went out to make the phone calls from phone boxes in Kensington. Diana stopped the phone calls when the Hoare's got Scotland Yard involved. After that Diana told a friend that she was afraid she would be charged with stalking and harassment.
Strange how this is all coming out now that the Queen is dead and Bashir himself is seriously ill with heart complications, won’t suprize me if he ‘dies suddenly.’
She'll never be forgotten, neither will Harry. They were both treated appallingly and stood up for themselves. They spoke truth to power. All of us, who do this, are attacked and made to suffer.
no one forced her into marrying someone who was in love with someone else! She wasn't perfect either! Even her son who was her confident at a very young age knew that!
I have a copy of this interview on my computer. It was hard to find, but I will keep it forever. I tried to post to UA-cam but it was taken down within minutes. Yes he lied to her… but Diana still told the truth. The facts are the facts.
I’m simply “on about “ …that Diana’s dance performance To uptown girl, with Wayne sleep..is not available to watch anywhere at all…I actually remember when it happened I was 10 yrs old in 1985…
Camilla was very good friends with Stuart Higgins (former The Sun editor) in the 80s, he spoke to her once a week from 1982 (the year William was born) to 1992 (she only stopped after C&D separation). Well known and widely reported at the time that she leaked to him everything Charles said to her about Diana. Camilla is the villain, she needed to rehabilitate her image that made her dangerous because of the connections that she forged within the British press. Piers Morgan, Jeremy Clarkson, Levin, Bower, Wooten, "lady" C, Penny Junor, Dimbleby, Mark Bolland, Tobyn Andreae (former deputy editor of the Daily Mail). Her image rehabilitation 'left bodies in the street'
She was the loneliest woman in the world. Not only left by mother father brother husband...royals. She was mistreated at every turn..she was so mentally not aware of the ignorance of the real world. Sickens me they did what they did to her. To the end.
Diana thought they were spying on her and working to destroy her. They were not. She was a deeply vulnerable woman, damaged by her difficult childhood, and they preyed upon her. Diana would have never given the interview without the bank statements that were falsified. That tells you everything. He couldn't have got it without LIES. THINK.
@@glen7318andrew morton said she would do the interview with any other interviewer. she wanted to tell her story and defend herself! many wanted an interview w/ her but bashir stood out by using lies to attract her attention. she wrote a letter saying she had no regrets about the interview and her friends, even the butler Paul Burell, said she didnt in fact regret it.
Diana spoke the true❤❤❤.I was 15 years old when i watched her interview❤and whole Europe loved it,not only we germans❤! That Interview left her mark " Queen of Peoples heart's❤! If Earl Spencer had allowed Diana spending her summer time on their family estate 😢then she would be still with us😢because she had never went to Paris😢.
dont be silly. Diana was not asking Charles S to sepnd the summer at Althorp, she wanted to rent a house for weekends, and when she could not have the house she watned she abandoned the idea. It would not have prevented her from going abroad for her holidays.
@@glen7318 check your behavior before you comment 🙄. And if you already have no idea about what's happening, it's best not to comment at all. Diana wanted to go on vacation with her sons on her family property. However, her brother has forbidden this because of the paparazzi He wanted to keep media hype away from his family. He himself announced this in later interviews. Have a nice Sunday to you 🙄.
nonsense - it was in 1993 that Diana tried to rent a house on the Alth Estate. She did not want a holiday place but a place to take the boys at weekends because they were bored with being in London and liked country sports. Charles S agreed but he could not let her have the house she had orignally wanted as someone else was living in it and it was also too near to the perimeter walls. So he offered her other houses, but Diana got annoyed and ended up in a row iwth him which lasted for some time. @@thomasortmann41
@@thomasortmann41You're absolutely RIGHT! 💡 Her brother is back peddling trying to clean up HIS Mess & make himself look innocent! 😤 Diana wanted to stay at her family's estate for the summer & he said NO! Blamed it on the paparazzi's 📸 but by that time Mr. Fayed still honored the invite to France for her & the boys! 💡 Her brother is NO better than the Brf 🇬🇧! He betrayed her TOO! Now he's talking & 🤑cashing in on her LEGACY! #shame 💛💞🤗
@@thomasortmann41 Its TRUE! Her brother sad also - it's no security for the boys on his property. But after her death he open memorial/museum with her dresses for the tourist from hall World to making money from his beloved sister.
@@marigold6920 I would be vindictive too if my husband was orchestrating a smear campaign against me, through the press. Both Tom Bower & Patrick Jephson have talked about it. Patrick also did a whole podcast about it recently. And it wasn't just Charles, but his staff and his friends too. They were all ganging up against Diana.
@@myfemvideo Somehow the other side of the story had to come out. Charles could not come out publicly and say that Diana had made his life a living nightmare could he!
No one ever supported her, no one ever loved her... no one ever helped her... *The eternal victim* My God! I think we have to analyze why? Why *NOBODY* tolerated her? Not only did Charles never love her, all her lovers ended up leaving her (and there were many) Narcissistic? Toxic?
The royal family has no one to blame but themselves. If Lady Diana had felt respected and protected during her marriage, she never would have felt the need to sit and give a tell all interview.
If memory serves, Diana begged Charles for refuge on the Althorp Estate, but he refused. Everyone knew the marriage would be a disaster, arranged out of desperation when the hunt for a willing and suitable broodmare proved fruitless - no one wanted to marry Charles! When Diana's sister turned him down, the palace turned once again to Diana's parents, they had a teenage daughter. It didn't take long for the extremely shy Diana to agree to marry a man she'd only met a handful of times - the promise of a fairytale life as the Princess of Wales followed by the Queen of England appealed to her romantic self.
Princess Diana spoke the truth. So sad she was treated the way she was. She was beautiful inside and out. She died much too soon. The world still needs her light.🦋
She was telling the truth regardless of Bashir, there were three of them in her marriage to PC. That was her way of telling the her side of her marriage and why she was so unhappy, sadly she loved him with her whole heart.
@@MariaHernandez-rc2eq did you have inside news in that then. PD was picked by the Queen Mother and Diana's grandmother Lady Dermot as she didn't have a history of sleeping around, that was why PC couldnt marry Mrs Parker Bowles to provide an heir
@@cynthiarichardson4633 Nobody chose Diana to marry Charles, she was not a poor lamb taken to the slaughterhouse. Since she was a child and her sister Sarah was Charles's girlfriend, she set out to be the Princess of Wales. Sarah Spencer herself once stated that Diana as a child said *SHE WAS GOING TO BE THE PRINCESS OF WALES* Notice that no one ever heard her say that she wanted to be Charles's wife, or that she loved Charles... No, no,no!!! Her obsession was his titles....She wanted to reach the top and she didn't care that Charles had been her sister's boyfriend. How disgusting that! 🤮 Her whole family warned her that he loved Camilla and she didn't care either! They warned her that in addition to loving Camilla, he had been in a relationship with her for years and she didn't care either! Charles was honest with her and told her that he did NOT love her, and she didn't care!!!! Still got married! She wanted the crown even if it had FIRE!! Would she have married Charles if he was an ordinary man???? She knew very well what she was going for. She was never a victim and much less the naive of the story as she tried to paint it. How do you marry someone who doesn't love you? I guess the incentive was strong. To be the future Queen of Ireland, Scotland and England. Which is no small thing!
@Mail Alias Diana had set her eyes on becoming the Princess of Wales. As a teenager she had a poster of Charles on her wall at school. Diana's own mother knew that Diana was in love with the idea of Charles the Prince and not Charles the man. She tried to advise Diana against marrying him for that reason. As Diana's cousin Robert Spencer said, Diana decided to bag herself a Prince, so she bagged herself a Prince.
Matt Lauer, David Letterman, Bob Iger, Vince McMahon, Mortimer Zuckerman, Jeff Zucker, Shari Redstone, Jay Leno, Ted Turner, Rupert Murdoch, Les Moonves, John O'Hurley and Martin Bashir should be held accountable for humiliating Britney, LiLo, Amanda, Paris, Nicole, the Olsens, Demi, Miley, Janet and Princess Diana. Period.
If there’s anything that this documentary has helped to prove…. Is that that BBC interview was really necessary to be had because she got to tell her truth to the world. Shame on Charles!!
This interview may have cost Diana her life. We will never know. However it was because of this Interview that the Queen was forced to order a Divorce. If not for this interview Diana and Charles could have continued to live separate lives while continuing to do Royal Functions together occasionally and Diana could have been Queen today.
@@marigold6920 they could not have gone on being married and living apart, indefinitely. The C of E said that they would be OK with the separation provided the couple focussed on their children, which they did and avoided affairs, which they did not. How could you have a royal couple lviing apart, seeing other lovers and then crown them king and queen>?
20:35 you can see she is almost at the brink of crying...all emotions which she had packed up for years was just gushing outt...although I'm an Indian I genuinely feel so sorry how she was isolated..
@@user-yd4nk4lm6s Yeah, cause she was a British princess, something which supposedly shouldn't concern us...coz us Indians were totally tortured during the British reign, which makes us hate them till today. Starting from the diamond in the british crown to Kohinoor and most other jewels, which they totally looted from India, they never gave us back.... But what I wanted to say was, Princess diana was so sweet that even many of us indians loved her a lot...
I wonder how Come in and park Ur balls feels she was the last romp the Prince had b4 he married LADY Diana Spencer..No more canoodling now that she's the Kings cunts hurt😂😂😂😂😂😂👑🕳️👍‼️
It doesn’t matter how bashir got Diana into that interview. The bottom line is Diana got to say what she had to and it was all Truth. It’s not like Bashir gave her some script to read to the public.
Diana was given the questions well in advance and she rehearsed her answers to suit her narrative. She was in full control of the questions she would be asked. And she was not completely honest.
no, she wasnt. Her brother told her that he did not think Bashir was on hte level, but foolishly Diana was taken in by him, and did the interview. Bashir did play on her paranoia. @@paulfrost8895
nonsnese. she was divorced for a good reason, and she could have had a happy busy comfortable life as a divorced princess, had she ketp her security guards.
@@glen7318 Partly right, but again still putting the blame on Diana and still blaming Diana Now, but we the masses know the truth, That will never change, King Charles and now Queen Camila, have damaged the Royal family for ever
@@jennygoddard6875 you childish how do you blame Charles for all of Diana‘s bad behavior she was a grown ass woman. You keep bringing up Camilla but you forget to bring up Hewitt in the mini me and Diana had affairs with while she was married. She was the first want to cheat on him in 1985 and he left her in 1985 and went back to Camilla. If she would’ve never happened another man’s bad, she would’ve still had her husband. A man don’t become so detached mean for no reason one thing about it how I know Diana cheated first because it’s easy for a woman to give a man for cheating. That’s why she kept one in charge to come back to her, but how I know that Charles was cheated on Thursdays because he never went back to her. Men do not like taking betrayal. It’s obvious that he was her in over the marriage once she did that.
In my opinion, all BBC "investigators" are complicit in that no one asked/pressed Bashir for the answer as to why he fabricated the documents because they knew there could be no acceptable ethical answer to that question, and the BBC would have to take action and be held accountable for the fraud Bashir perpetrated on the Spencer and Diana for his own agenda/career advancement.
This so scary. If the royals weren’t in on it behind the scenes she wouldn’t have believed him in the first place. She obviously believed this stranger for a reason. I think this stuff really was happening to her, but from the inside. From people supposed to be protecting her, and keeping her safe.
Diana suffered with paranoia. Even William said that Bashir had played on her paranoia. Not that he had caused it but indicating that his mother already suffered with paranoia. Diana was surrounded by people who wanted to help her but she had pushed them all away and she would never take advice.
@@marigold6920 that would be so hard. I understand her being paranoid. How do you trust, and take help from people/a family who are also trying to keep you in a pretty box.
Charles wasnt' that good at taking advice either. Some of his friends have said that they told him they weren't sure Diana was the right girl for him and he went ahead and married her. Hegot very annoyed with a lady who told him she didnt think his interview was a good idea. @@marigold6920
what are you on about? WIlliam did refer to Diana as being paranoid and said that Bashir's lies had provoked her to become more paranoid and unsettled. He would like the Bashir interview not to be shown again as he feels it was obtained wiht lies.@@jennygoddard6875
please dont talk so silly. Harry and Meghan wanted to stay part time in the royal family, and spend the rest of their time in America making money. They were told that they could not be half in ad half out of the RF and then they otped for full time money making. that is well known. @@jennygoddard6875
@@jennygoddard6875 He spends 4 million a year on security too. I am sure whatever he knows he has written down with instructions upon his death it to be released. That is the real reason he is still here. As far as what Diaan told him, he was 12 when she died. you make her sound crazier than they try to paint her. Harry has found out on his own.
Poor Diana, He used her! A Man without his word is NOTHING! Shame on Bashir!!!! A Journalist should be someone you trust. Bashir has blood on his hands
If anyone knew the real Diana very well, it was her family! Her family knew her very well and they know that she was not the sweet little dove that she appeared to be. With her cousin Fergie she had broken off relations and did not speak to her... When she died she hadn't talked to her sister Jane for a year...Diana didn't want to know anything about her sister! She had also cut off her relationship with her own mother because the mother had asked her to stop behaving like a whore with so many lovers, and she asked her to think about her children who lived in shame! Diana swore never to speak to her mother again and so she did.
Regardless of how Martin got the interview, Diana still said what she said, he did not tell her what to say, so I don't see what this video is trying to do, she told her truth and that's the end of
The video is trying to distract people away from what Diana said - the facts. It's trying to pivot the conversation away from what tools the Royal Family are and why they shouldn't still be given a dime of taxpayer money, let alone influence. They want to rewrite history and erase Diana. This interview was the most damning information and out of her own mouth, so they've seen to it that we can't see it in its entirety anymore. Andrew Morton's book will be the next thing they'll go after. Of course, most people don't read books anymore, so they know that's not as much of a threat.
Its trying and succeeding with many dumbed down idiots who have been conditioned to receive suggestion to the point of actually causing them to ignore or dismiss OBVIOUS Truth. The queen reptilian child torturing, sacraficing, blood drinking murder of multitudes and Diana is DEAD..in hell
It was the deceitful way he got the interview,of course it matters how he got the interview,it just shows the deceitful path he will take to get what he wants.
I’m glad Diana was able to tell her truth before she had a most unfortunate “accident” in a Paris tunnel. He’s given her a voice after she was silenced
The BBC & that Building - I hold no respect for them. I wonder why there is no real discussion about what Diana was actually daring to say openly(at such personal risk).
At 8:37 when Diana says “there’s no better way to dismantle a personality than to isolate it”, I instantly thought of Megan and what she is doing to harry. She’s taken Diana’s own words and is using it to her own advantage.
Charles and Camilla used her since day one. Richard Parker-Bowles, brother of Camilla's ex-husband Andrew, was quoted by the Mail Sunday newspaper as saying his sister-in-law saw Diana as easy to manipulate. She initially encouraged the relationship between Charles and Diana because she thought Diana was gormless (stupid). Over the years, Camilla did intimate to him that she thought Diana was either half-witted or quite mad. He said he felt sorry for Diana, adding: "The fact is that if Camilla had been a child on the beach, she would have knocked other children's sand castles down. She is a wrecker at heart. She doesn't like to see other people happy."
I just googled Richard Parker-Bowles. What I read knocked my socks off. She, the mistress, allegedly slept with Diana's fiance the week before their wedding and the night before their wedding, allegedly according to Richard. WTF!!! And they are now King and Queen and Head of the Church. Yikes !!!
@@jasminetyana2426 how does a brother in law know if Camilla slept with someone the night before his wedding? THe night before the wedding Camilla was with her own husband at a regimental function
Might have been a wretched way to get the interview but the truth is the truth. It does not change the validity and value of the truth. This interview is a blueprint of the Firm and RF behinds the scenes.
Princess Diana is my patron saint. My mom and i used to collect Diana stamps when we could still afford it and ive alwaus felt such a strong connection to her. I was only 2 when she died and it still makes me cry 😭😭😭
What’s so sad is she was so young when she married charles and she truly did love him. He didn’t love her. He loved someone else. He knew better she didn’t. She was fooled into thinking she was going to live happily ever after. It’s really sad that they forced people to marry certain types of partners because that’s what royals did. She never deserved anything that happened to her and I was so happy when she got away. What is so sad is when she was finally happy she died. I applaud Harry for walking away. His mother would also have been proud of him.
Queen Diana..is a beautiful person inside and out. At her early age of marriage She is dignified person.thats why she is loved by many.people for.all walks of life.
Regardless of means of securing interview, what Diana went through was real & very true. Charles was having an affair with Camilla, he ill treated Diana. So what the interview was secured by wrongful means the truth would have come out anyway sooner or later.
It’s sad that now people say things like she’s a bed hopper and she cheated on Charles first. She sacrificed herself by putting her words to sound like she cheated first when she had proof before they got married that he was with Camilla before their engagement. How dirty it was that Charles thought he had the right to come out with the truth about what Diana was paranoid about. Doing that he caused Camilla’s husband to go ahead and divorce her and the Queen made him and Diana divorce. I don’t think Diana would have been able to move forward to marry whoever she wanted because she was the mother of future kings. An heir and a spare. Camilla, because Diana died now sits on the throne Diana should be on. It’s something how she said she wouldn’t be Queen. She knew. The clean up of the BBC error didn’t do much for Diana but it gave Charles a chance to be with his true love
@@trishamathias5563 Charles didn’t do anything with the titles. By law, the wife of the king is the queen. Queen consort is not a title. It is a role description, differentiating a king’s wife from a queen regnant such as Queen Elizabeth II. Queen Elizabeth wished that Camilla be queen consort, rather than Princess Consort as had been previously announced. A Queen consort’s title is Her Majesty The Queen (or informally HM Queen (name). So in calling our new queen Her Majesty The Queen (or informally, HM Queen Camilla), Elizabeth’s wishes have been precisely followed.
@@jrimpau The palace released a statement when they married that Camila would be princess consort at the queen's death because of their divorces being against church of England beliefs. Many believe the title only changed when the dying queen struck a deal with Charles to protect the disgraced Andrew. Why do you think Andrew is still in Royal Lodge and not Frogmore cottage as your king mandated back in the spring? Charles tried to boot him, but Andrew had the leverage. If Andrew got booted from the Lodge, he said he would write a tell all book. Which would mean Camilla would have to revert to princess consort.
@@peachygal4153 the statement they released was that it was their "intention" that she be known as princess consort. (They didn't say anything about the reason.) But the announcement had no force of law, and "intentions" can change. Indeed, there is no legal nor historical precedent for the title of princess consort. By law, the wife of the King is The Queen. It would take a literal act of Parliament to change it, and the agreement of all 14 realms would be required as well. The late queen had absolutely no power to mandate titles for a future king's wife. Thus, there did not need to be any agreement with Charles and Andrew, because by law, Camilla could not "revert to princess consort". Barring action by Parliament, it was inevitable that Camilla would one day become Queen from the moment Charles slipped the ring on her finger.
The interview that came out of this subterfuge was meaningful and I believe saved lives that were suffering with eating disorders,depression,and abandonement.While the story is interesting in detail,it is not surprising in any way.Lady Diana has always had my respect for her honesty in the platform provided to her,and then Prince Charles deserved this disclosure and a lot more as far as I'm concerned. In short,this is an interesting non-story.
Yes, all we know is HER side. She knew that the royal family would never go public and tell THEIR side of the story. So basically she could tell whatever she wanted, nobody would contradict her. Never complain, never explain.
@@iceprincess3981how naive do you have to be to believe that? lmao they control the media in the uk and camilla is friends with several columnists including the sun and dailymail, two media networks that dedicate most of their time to badmouthing diana TO THIS DAY. they will never go public and talk about it, but they send their lackeys instead. Camilla's ex-husband's brother has already spoken about how thirsty she's for media attention, Harry has already said that she's not afraid of "leaving bodies in the street" to stay on top and Diana's friends, including former employees, have already said that a campaign against her was being made in the 90s to try to boost Charles's popularity and introduce Camilla to the world. On the princess's death anniversaries they always find a way to bring something defamatory about her and try to make Charles and Camilla a big deal. when charles was crowned a commentator was on TV talking about how diana would like to see camilla as queen LMAO how can ANYONE see/read this and not think they're the villains?
Precisely. Martin Bashir wanted the story. He was unscrupulous in getting it. No surprise there. That's what many journalists do. But it doesn't take away from what she said...which the Royal Family have finally gotten the BBC to remove so that history can be rewritten in favor of them.
Diana had a 'thing' about MI5 - she thought they had staged a hit on Barry Manakee - when Georgie Campbell asked Diana if she really believed MI5 would employ a 17yr old novice driver to take part in a 'hit' on a serving Metropolitan Police Officer - Diana didn't even know the details. By the way Diana's accident was in Paris, France, it's MI6 who work in foreign countries
Love for you forever Lady Di God bless. She was real no matter what some people are saying about her. Her heart was genuine, she was honest and full of love for humanity ❤❤. God bless her for eternity.
Is it any wonder that Prince Harry feels like he does. He has been surrounded by palace intrigue, and reporters all his life. Then he brings home his bride, and her presence starts his mother's ordeal all over again in his mind. They don't like my bride, they (the royals) didn't like mum. His unsettled mind and heart started to roil with conspiracy and resentment. He's the spare, and now because of his new wife, the outsider. I need to get ahead of this, protect myself and Megan. It's just so sad for Harry and William. There whole life has been turmoil from birth till now.
@@lacecocoa6272 Plus if they did not want a future king to have a half sibling of mixed race I am sure they aren't happy about a niece and nephew of mixed race for that same future king. Or for that matter, the current king having grandchildren of mixed race. You can bet your bottom dollar Harry has it all written out with instructions it be released if he or his children or wife suddenly have an "accident." One thing for sure if there was any truth to Hewitt being Harry's bio father the palace would have that released that by now. It would be the perfect way to permanently get rid of Harry and also to blacken Diana's name forever. All the nasty rumors have not been able to do that, but genuine proof would cause her memory serious harm.
He did totally go about that interview in a deceptive way, but clearly the princess needed this interview as did the world and it is history right here that we are watching in the comments that she made told us all we need to know about the royal family… quite frankly I don’t think they should even exist as Royals. They think they are an upper class citizens above, and better than any other humans and I find them despicable, and they truly crushed her soul!❤
Are you serious? People are bashing him because he falsified documents that got him into Diana's circle, and ultimately to Princess Diana herself. He lied about the government spying on her, lied about her head of security stating that he was also spying and selling info about Diana, lied to her brother about the same things and evidently this resulted in the Princess' increased anxiety and furthered her fears about the monarchy and their involvement in her ultimate demise . So yes he ABSOLUTELY deserved to be bashed by society.( In my opinion, he got off way too easy ! ) Despite the fact that she desperately needed to tell the world the real truth behind her struggles, he still should have been charged with the crimes he committed against Diana, her family and her security team. He betrayed her the same way many people in her life had already done so. Although the interview was therapeutic for the Princess, Bashier used her weakness and vulnerability to further his career, and despite the pain he caused Diana and her family he never took a smidge of responsibility for his actions.
@@mirkat-wr4be was it therapeutic to drive her to more suspicion of her in laws, her staff and everyone in her life, including her own son? to lead her to say something foolish about Charles and the succession which puhsed the queen to insist on a divorce.
Her story needed to be told. And she deserved to heard. TRULY heard. Deceit or not. Fake or not. But her pain def was not fake. He knew that. How else would he be able to get it? In the end she got to live her life more on her terms and speak her truth. RIP Diana. Forever the royal of royals.
Yeah they totally murked her. Makes total sense as to why the redheaded son left that mess & brought his wife to the U.S. now. Didn't want to crash in a tunnel with his last vision being a blinding MI6 light before a 110 minute ambulance ride to a hospital 4 miles away.
You think any of these idiots can pick up on your implications? Just say it... The queen reptilian child torturing, sacraficing, blood drinking murder of multitudes and Diana is DEAD..in hell.
RECOMMENDED -- Marc Dutroux: The pedophile & serial killer whose crimes changed Belgium (TW) ua-cam.com/video/KZmtuH_Bjt4/v-deo.html
Russian billioneirs lie to you Brits thousand times, and you don't mind, money doesn't smell...dies it?....
It's all fine and dandy.
No doubt that interview of Diana broushed counter direction many potentates and their intententions with its naked truth. That's why 25 years since, you are so keen on "finding the truth" about this fateful interview.
Yes, Bashir was wrong to sly his way into the interview, but it's a much lesser evil than what is going on in "the establishment" and what was done to person Diana Spencer by that establishment.
La vedova Giulia a finito di nuovo ore dodici dal Lazio deve studiare anche i figli nella scuola cinema assasine viaggi pagati
"She won't go quietly, I'll fight to the end. " Haunting words.
Is there a time stamp?
@@Slayalldayeverydayheehee 7:37
@@Slayalldayeverydayheehee7:49
@@JaycobMoody lol, thanks 😭🙏🙏
Even though what he did to get her to do the interview was absolutely disgusting, this interview needed to be made. You could just tell she's held it all in for so long. And she also opened up about topics such as self harm, eating disorders and depression, things that weren't very talked about at the time. It must've meant a lot to people going through similar things. She told the truth. She needed to be heard.
Gotta love all these people who either werent born then or little kids telling how it was in the 80s and 90s...We talked about eating disorders, domestic violence, date rape...I gave public workshops on them in schools and clinics as a therapist...Everywhere from 1993-97...zz..Stick with what you know and what you remember...
Are we gonna believe a drama show ?
Exactly
@@stephaniesimpson1150 How incredibly rude! Did you conduct these workshops with the same guessing you have here? I have yet to read where anyone has disclosed their age for you to know whether they were born during the 80s and 90s. Not to mention there are people from other locations and countries who didn't openly speak on such topics. The U.K. certainly did not. Diana, because she was in the position of The Princess of Wales, she made enormous contributions to how AIDS was viewed and educated people on it so that they could not catch it from touching someone. She changed the perception of how people looked at the homeless. All these topics and issues existed, but the perception was very different in HOW they were looked upon.
Let go of your arrogance, and you might become open to actually learning something. Then you may have something of value to contribute!
That is not for you to decide.
What Bashir did was get Diana to TALK... he lied to her to get her to TALK. But Diana didnt lie in her interview!!! She spoke the truth!!!
Somehow brains are so damaged these days that this spellcasting suggestion causes their weak minds to somehow ignore or dismiss OBVIOUS TRUTH.
The queen reptilian child torturing, sacraficing, blood drinking murder of multitudes and Diana is DEAD..in hell
The trouble is ,that manipulation led to the direct circumstances of her demise.
@@r.22r except that it didnt
She only said what was convenient for her to perpetuate the image of "the eternal victim"
@@MariaHernandez-rc2eq or... she spoke out loud about how she felt based on her husbands actions. I am pretty sure there is no such thing as getting married becoming a princess, having half the world watch your every move and then to find out your husband loves his mistress and certain ppl in his family thinks its ok and theres nothing to be done about it. Clearly ones mental health or behaviour would only go south!
I’m glad the interview happened. She spoke her truth. 😢
And yet it still backfired, it damaging her image of course
@@WhD2024
It was very controversial. Some people believed she was telling the truth. Some believed she was mentally unstable. Others believed she was lying and trying to undermine Charles and the monarchy.
@@karlamccullough5319 he shouldn't have had an affair, had he been loyal to his WIFE, she wouldn't have had reason to "air out dirty laundry" he shouldn't even be King, and Camilla sure as heck shouldn't be Queen. How could they? Knowing they continued their affair while he was still married to the Real Queen Diana
@@kamayisidore6098 Dian was not the queen. If people were barred from being monarchs because of adultery, there wouldn't be a king or queen in hte world.
I agree 💯
Poor Diana she never stood a chance. It's so sad to know how alone she was.
She wasnt alone she had staff her sisters. Dodi and his family
@@janeslater8004 She hardly knew Dodi, she spent couple of holidays with him
@@glen7318 i agree. She used their protection services as she didnt trust royal ones but they turned out to be rubbish. She used dodi to make the doctor cardioligist boy friend jealous dr hassat. All very peculiar
At the time of this interview Diana was dating Haznat Khan.
@@Stephanie-zd5imshe really Dated wrong men...
What Diana said was still truthful & authentic.
No it wasn't authentic. She had set out to stab not only Charles but the entire Royal Family in the back because she was full of vengeance.
That was her nature.
Even if you are unhappy in a marriage you don't try to bring your husbands entire family down.
Also what about the effect of this interview on her sons. Charles is their father and the Royal Family are their family.
Anyway several of Diana's staff including her Private Secretary resigned the day after this interview aired.
They had finally had enough.
By the way Diana had screened every question before the interview and had rehearsed all of her answers.
@@marigold6920 I am quite sure if you were "tricked" into a marriage with a husband in love with someone else you have literally nothing in common with and then completely dismissed because you are preferred by the public, so you are undermined and judged for your every move would put you on the edge. I can see why as she evolved from desperately trying to get Prince Charles to love her, to giving up on that never happening and trying to find someone who would love her while he carried on with Camilla, and continuing to stay married to finally feeling the anger at the betrayal and her life being hell in such a miserable marriage. Diana never ever criticized the Queen or The Duke of Edinburgh. She stayed committed to the Crown and the monarchy since it was the future of her sons. Who she did criticize and stand up to head-on was who she called the Palace "grey coats". GOOD FOR HER!! When you are under the pressure she was under and being deceived the way she was, you would be desperate in wanting your story told. Bashir should be in jail. He has a direct hand that led to her death. Think of how if he hadn't played on her vulnerability and paranoia at the time, the interview never would have happened she and Charles may have made some "arrangement" to co-exist in their marriage, and Harry would e a different person and on a better path. So if you are going to blame the victim in this for her own death, come up with better contributions than " Diana had screened every question before the interview and had rehearsed all of her answers" as though that is a reason for someone to die......
Absolutely. She said her truth and just like back then the RF are falling over themselves to try to silence her voice. There area always the royal sycophants who also will defend the RF no matter what they do.
@@EMG-pi4cb I am not a Royal sycophant. I don't like Charles politics for a start.
But there were two sides to this story and Charles has never been allowed to speak out.
Even if he could he wouldn't out of respect for his children!
@@user-xe5cz3dw8m Diana died because she and Dodi went tare arsing out of the Ritz in the middle of the night, trying to outrun the Paparazzi.
If they had stayed the night at the Ritz as planned she might still be alive today.
Also if she had not ditched her Royal Protection she would have been protected.
Unfortunately Diana and Dodi were very foolish and irresponsible that night which lead to their demise.
Thank GOD she was able to HER story in her own words
Weirdly though, watching it real time from New Zealand when this interview happened , no one my age (I'm a couple of years younger than Diana) thought it that shocking. Riveting yes, very much a story that needed to be told, but no big deal in the scheme of our lives. Why is it being buried? Princess D had a right to be heard and it does feel like a burying of history that we can't watch the original interview now. There was no real judgement at the time either, just life unfolding.
I’m about your age, I watched from the US and felt similarly. She confirmed a lot of what had been suspected for years.
Sharing the family dirty laundry with the public is against royal protocol. The BBC Panorama interview was an act of disloyalty to the monarchy.
The interview was intended to hurt and undermine Charles.
Diana's reputation was tarnished by the tabloid reports of her affairs. The tabloids labeled Diana a home wrecker.
She was angry at Charles and wanted to destroy Charles's reputation. In 1994 Charles publicly confessed his marriage was irretrievably broken down by 1986 and that's when he renewed his intimate relationship with Camilla in 1986. Charles was responding to the 1993 Camillagate scandal.
James Hewitt's first book about his affair with Diana was published in 1994. Diana and her lovers usually denied their affairs. She couldn't deny her affair with Hewitt after his book was published.
Charles's confession and Hewitt's book added credibility to the tabloid reports of Diana's affairs. Diana had very little privacy because the paparazzi hung out around Kensington palace 24 hours a day and reported on her affairs.
Charles and Diana informally separated in 1986. They were officially separated in 1992. Why blame Camilla in 1995?
I believe Diana was being defensive and blamed Camilla to divert attention away from her affairs. Diana wanted public support and sympathy. The interview is very biased and one-sided. Diana said what she wanted people to believe and it wasn't fully truthful.
@@karlamccullough5319the British Monarchy is a joke and is sad and it’s a disgrace to God! May Diana rest in peace in the heavens. Sweet Angel! 😢
Diana said what she said in the interview. Period.
EXACTLY! This is nothing more than the Royal Family trying to erase her and raise Charles and Camilla's profile. The point was not HOW the interview was obtained. Plenty of journalists scam their way into interviews. I'm not saying it is morally okay, but it does NOT change what she said and THAT is what is important. The Royal Family has been trying to figure out how to get rid of this interview for years because it tells the truth and they want Charles to start his reign with a clean slate and want Diana forgotten and Camilla's reputation covered up.
Yes..
And she meant it!
@@MrsJaytheBeauty did she call the queen or the royals in general MONSTERS?
did she call the queen or the royals in general MONSTERS?
8:37 "There is no better way to dismantle a personality than to isolate it. "...the line that touched the heart of mine although I'm an Indian... I can understand how much pain she was in, and she definitely knew that the entire family in which she was engaged had gone against her
dismantle or to take apart
@@Kimllg88 that was a typing mistake... thanks, though... : )
Anyone ever wondered if "Charles, the Un-noble King", instigated this at Diana's expense ❓
We all know how she died - but why ❓
what are you on about? @@joysynmonds9082
She forgot to mention how she attempted to isolate Charles personality in the early years of the marriage.
Making him sack 40 long term and loyal members of his staff (because she didn't like them!)
Kicking up a stink everytime he saw his own friends and forcing him to give up most of his friends to hang out with her own younger friends!
Even making him give away his beloved old Labrador because she thought the dog was smelly!
She made such fuss everytime he wanted to do something for himself like go our horseriding or stalking or hiking with his family at Balmoral!
She would literally threaten to harm herself or throw her wedding ring on the ground.
Emotional blackmail no less!
These are the behaviours which dismantle another person's personality!
Typical narcissist behaviour!
No matter what you are selling us, this interview was groundbreaking. Take just one single aspect, the bulimia. Diana did so much for those affected AND those close to them. We all knew someone who fought that battle, we all learned a lot that helped us. Not just those directly affected.
I find it revealing that this entire story is reducing to the "Well, there were three of us in this marriage" and never mention one single aspect of what she said besides this one sentence. She said a lot and gladly nowadays these men who rule the world so badly can't erase the content of this important interview. Not anymore.
Yes absolutely. And I think the sad thing is Prince William lives in denial. Like surely enough he must realise his mother was screwed over by his father. Really really badly and it was a good thing she gave this interview. But instead it’s like he wanted to bring Bashir down instead of looking at the positives
The thing with Diana, and as far as I'm aware it has never been confirmed, but if she had the rumored affair with former England Rugby Captain Will Carling, which may have led to the break of his marriage to his ex-wife Julia. If there is any truth in it then I'd lose all or any sympathy that I may have had for the late Princess. It just gets me that a person, who had been cheated on by her husband and went through all the misery that it brought on her, then pretty much goes on TV and conducts an interview where it's clear she's attempting to illicit sympathy would put another woman through the same thing. Again though, I'm not saying it necessarily is true but if it was I feel it puts her in a more damning light.
@@robertmcelwaine7024
It's complicated.
Diana had 8 or more affairs before the divorce was final in 1996. Some of her affairs were with married men and the tabloids labeled Diana a home wrecker. Diana caused Will Carling's divorce. She tried to break up Oliver Hoare's marriage. Her bodyguard Barry Mannakee was married. Dodi was engaged to Kelly Fisher when Diana became involved with him. Diana knowingly hurt other women. Diana was the adulterous other woman in their marriages/relationships.
In the Peter Settelen video called Diana Revealed, Diana admitted Charles was faithful until 1986.
I suspect Diana blamed Camilla for the problems in the marriage to divert attention away from the reports of Diana's affairs.
Diana was not a Saint. The BBC Panorama interview was intended to hurt and undermine Charles. Diana was not a Saint.
@@robertmcelwaine7024She had affairs with other married men. When Oliver Hoare refused to leave his wife after ending an affair with her she bombarded his home with malicious calls.
@funtimefranky
Oliver or his wife requested a police investigation. It was determined Diana made over 300 crank phone calls to his home from her cell phone and two phone boxes near Kensington palace. The police threatened to charge Diana with harassment if she didn't stop. There was a cover-up to keep the story out of the news. The investigating police officers eventually told the story. Diana had admitted to a friend that she was driving over to Oliver's house in the middle of the night and phoned him, waited for the lights to come on and then hung up.
Diana was 32 or 33 and behaved like a lovesick teenager.
It was a tragic death end for Diana and so many people took advantage of her vulnerability. Charles is a horrible person, I don't know how he can live with himself. Many of us will never forget how he treated Diana, even if he is now the king. The only good thing is that we were able to hear from Diana's mouth her truth and how she felt. The best thing Prince Harry did was walk away.
He wont be long King. God works on mysterious why. Diana should be queen.
He did do wrong, but at the same time, he was pushed into an arranged marriage with her when he was in love with someone else. I think the institution of the monarchy did them both wrong, but it did much more damage to Diana because she was an outsider and a woman
So many want to come down on Harry for getting out but can you blame him? There’s prerequisites around every corner for anything pertaining to any type of life normalcy. You’re born into a family that is referred to as the “institution” for goodness sakes. Every word and step you take is monitored and analyzed. I don’t put one ounce of blame on Harry for escaping and I would go so far to say that he knew Markle was his way out but what people need to remember is he’s still the kind hearted philanthropist his mother raised and no one can take that away and he’s still following through with his most dear charities. It’s as if no one escapes this life without an attempt at submission to their ways and rules but then without all that there wouldn’t be a monarchy would there? It’s becoming less and less necessary and more of just a London circus to visit when traveling. Think about it.
Harry was truthful about the press spinning the narrative for those who need their reputation cleaned
Harry is protecting his wife, like he wished someone had protected his mother.
She may have been manipulated but she told her story and shared her truth. It was just a matter of who would get her story
It puts into question other projects of Martin Bashir, and it makes him look very manipulative and skirmy, unethical, and who was he working for?--However; in spite of that, Diana was able to speak...this revelation merely taints the whole narrative.... but I believe her, and it just underscores that you can trust no one.
@@xenoikosakaxenia904 why do you believe her?
@@glen7318 Truth is Truth, as xenoikosakaxenia904 said.
and you are makng no sense. @@jennygoddard6875
@@glen7318because what she said in this interview has already been said in her own book. just read
At the end of the day she accomplished her goal and that was to get her message out. Diana knew exactly what she was doing when those cameras started rolling. Not just a pretty face 🥰
Good for her, why not, she had nothing else to lose, her marriage was over with Charles, she could live her own life,
Heartbreaking and tragic. Such a shame. She was such a beautiful person.
not inside
@@MariaHernandez-rc2eq
Camilla is ugly and will NEVER fill Diana’s shoes…
@@guestguest5128 So what? Nobody in their right mind wants to "fill Diana's shoes" For that you have to have many lovers, and break up many marriages, you have to be a very hypocritical and very false person. You have to cry in front of the public with an innocent face while in private you are an immoral person who has sex with single and *MARRIED* men. Nobody wants to be that!
@@MariaHernandez-rc2eq inside she was even more beautiful.
@@MariaHernandez-rc2eq She was beautiful both inside and outside. Diana's haters are hilarious, their deep bitterness is always entertaining to see.
Mommy tells Charlie to get married, Mommy tells Charlie to get divorced. Charlie always did what Mommy said, until he became king, then he ignored her directive. He's pathetic.
what nonsnese are you talkng? Charles could nt marry without his mother's permission and she also dissuaded him from divorce until things got very bad.
Had Charles loved and respected Diana and not had it off with Camilla, the interview would have never happened. Diana would still be alive and would be Queen. Instead we have the ugliest Queen on Earth.
@@glen7318 Yes, you are right. He wanted to divorce Diana long before he did but wasn't allowed. You just proved Kathy's point even more.
@@peachygal4153 what is the point? Charles could not marry like an ordinary man, he had to get the queen's permission or go to Parliament. He was also persuaded to stay in his bad marriage for years... becuase of duty to the crown
This is scary, just imagined what the RF, and BBC are capable of.
She was already talked an honest and really came from her heart no matter what sorrounding it .
Rest In Peace, princess Di. You are the queen of hearts ♥️, even beyond the borders of your island. We got a little glimpse of your pain, and that made you more human, brought you closer to us and farther from the institution.
Princess Diana was the most bullied person on earth during the 90's. God bless her soul.
She said what she felt and it was the truth...period.
The queen reptilian child torturing, sacraficing, blood drinking murder of multitudes and Diana is DEAD..in hell
No, it was a half truth!
When Diana said "we were always 3 in this marriage" she insinuated that Carlos and Camilla had always been together, and that is false... Well yes, in her soul they had always been together. My grandmother died 15 years ago and is still with me. Bashir continued to press her and she had no choice but to admit that Charles returned with Camilla in 1985. The prince returned with Camilla in 1985, after learning of Diana's affair with Mannakee, a married bodyguard with two little girls.
pd:Watch the full interview, not just the short one they always put on to sell the story of the "eternal victim"
@@MariaHernandez-rc2eq Either way, Diana said what she said...
@@nelixsulu6201 Of course, it wasn't a clone. 🤣🤣🤣
@@nelixsulu6201 Diana could lie without batting an eyelid.
Everyone knew this.
Remember when she was asked about the nuisance calls to Oliver Hoare? "
She had been accused of making hundreds of calls. It was in the newspapers back in the day.
In this interview Diana said she only made a dozen or so calls!
She lied.
Ken Wharfe her Bodyguard confirmed that Diana had made hundreds of calls.
He had to tail her every night when she went out to make the phone calls from phone boxes in Kensington.
Diana stopped the phone calls when the Hoare's got Scotland Yard involved.
After that Diana told a friend that she was afraid she would be charged with stalking and harassment.
They are two primary chioces in life===To accept conditions as they exist, or to accept the responsibility for changing them🥺🥺❤️
What woman would just accept a cheat and a liar? as he was with Camila?
what are you on about@@jennygoddard6875
Profound ✨⭐
Diana spoke the truth
Strange how this is all coming out now that the Queen is dead and Bashir himself is seriously ill with heart complications, won’t suprize me if he ‘dies suddenly.’
Do you think they really have the time or thought process agenda to do that? They aren’t Italians.
She had so many untrustworthy people around her. I don't know how she survived in that vipers den of the royal family.
SHE SPOKE THE TRUTH .
She'll never be forgotten, neither will Harry. They were both treated appallingly and stood up for themselves. They spoke truth to power. All of us, who do this, are attacked and made to suffer.
harry is a disgrace
lol. hnm are liars and have now been humiliated for it
@@deegeeEdits Get Camilla's balls off your chin.
Do not use Harry's name next to his mother's. He is an ABSOLUTE DISGRACE.
@@zzzbbbooo hm your view = but he just had bad timing
All Dianna wanted was love, dignity, and respect. All she got was a unfaithful husband who was emotionally spiritually married to another. Very sad.
no one forced her into marrying someone who was in love with someone else! She wasn't perfect either! Even her son who was her confident at a very young age knew that!
Her body guard said diana cheated first.its only the charles returned to camilla. Diana had affair with henry pembroke allegedly before harry was born
@@genevieveassamoi4840 That was her destiny anyway. Marrying Charles, and being the link between the old world and the modern monarchy.
@@genevieveassamoi4840 exactly what I’m saying, why couldn’t Diana just divorce him and get away if she was so alone and hated the royal family.
@@MsJonessss She wanted a divorce, but the Queen wouldn't allow it. It's easy for people not familiar with Diana's story to comment. sad
I have a copy of this interview on my computer. It was hard to find, but I will keep it forever. I tried to post to UA-cam but it was taken down within minutes. Yes he lied to her… but Diana still told the truth. The facts are the facts.
Yes indeed it is worrying that they trying to bury her twice…you can’t even watch the ballet perform with Wayne sleep..how odd😢
@@analrightboah2464 what are yo on about
I’m simply “on about “ …that Diana’s dance performance To uptown girl, with Wayne sleep..is not available to watch anywhere at all…I actually remember when it happened I was 10 yrs old in 1985…
When I say bury her twice they try to bury her legacy…
@@analrightboah2464 there's no video of the dance with Sleep.
Camilla was very good friends with Stuart Higgins (former The Sun editor) in the 80s, he spoke to her once a week from 1982 (the year William was born) to 1992 (she only stopped after C&D separation). Well known and widely reported at the time that she leaked to him everything Charles said to her about Diana. Camilla is the villain, she needed to rehabilitate her image that made her dangerous because of the connections that she forged within the British press. Piers Morgan, Jeremy Clarkson, Levin, Bower, Wooten, "lady" C, Penny Junor, Dimbleby, Mark Bolland, Tobyn Andreae (former deputy editor of the Daily Mail). Her image rehabilitation 'left bodies in the street'
She is a horrible creature. Penny Junor lies about Diana are laughable, and she was doing that long before Diana was killed.
0:09 7:20 8:28 8:32 8:36 20:02 20:22 29:54 all the parts of the interview so you guys don’t waste you’re time
Thankssss
thank you !
She was the loneliest woman in the world. Not only left by mother father brother husband...royals. She was mistreated at every turn..she was so mentally not aware of the ignorance of the real world. Sickens me they did what they did to her. To the end.
The "royals"??? You mean CHARLES.
@@zzzbbbooo The Royals period. To me they all had a hand in her treatment and possible demise.
stop talking nasty rubbish. if you think they had a hand in her death prove it@@kaliboo60
nonsnens
@@zzzbbbooo yes!
Regardless of Bashir's machinations. Diana *wanted* to and willingly *gave* the interview.
Diana thought they were spying on her and working to destroy her. They were not. She was a deeply vulnerable woman, damaged by her difficult childhood, and they preyed upon her. Diana would have never given the interview without the bank statements that were falsified. That tells you everything. He couldn't have got it without LIES. THINK.
dubious as to how willing she was, when she was tricked so much.
Why not, she was exposing the truth.
Do yo really not know how Bashir obtained the interview? @@jennygoddard6875
@@glen7318andrew morton said she would do the interview with any other interviewer. she wanted to tell her story and defend herself! many wanted an interview w/ her but bashir stood out by using lies to attract her attention. she wrote a letter saying she had no regrets about the interview and her friends, even the butler Paul Burell, said she didnt in fact regret it.
So why did.nt you protect your sister, especially when she asked to stay at your family home, too little too late .
dont talk nonsnese
Diana spoke the true❤❤❤.I was 15 years old when i watched her interview❤and whole Europe loved it,not only we germans❤!
That Interview left her mark " Queen of Peoples heart's❤!
If Earl Spencer had allowed Diana spending her summer time on their family estate 😢then she would be still with us😢because she had never went to Paris😢.
dont be silly. Diana was not asking Charles S to sepnd the summer at Althorp, she wanted to rent a house for weekends, and when she could not have the house she watned she abandoned the idea. It would not have prevented her from going abroad for her holidays.
@@glen7318 check your behavior before you comment 🙄. And if you already have no idea about what's happening, it's best not to comment at all. Diana wanted to go on vacation with her sons on her family property. However, her brother has forbidden this because of the paparazzi He wanted to keep media hype away from his family. He himself announced this in later interviews. Have a nice Sunday to you 🙄.
nonsense - it was in 1993 that Diana tried to rent a house on the Alth Estate. She did not want a holiday place but a place to take the boys at weekends because they were bored with being in London and liked country sports. Charles S agreed but he could not let her have the house she had orignally wanted as someone else was living in it and it was also too near to the perimeter walls. So he offered her other houses, but Diana got annoyed and ended up in a row iwth him which lasted for some time. @@thomasortmann41
@@thomasortmann41You're absolutely RIGHT! 💡 Her brother is back peddling trying to clean up HIS Mess & make himself look innocent! 😤
Diana wanted to stay at her family's estate for the summer & he said NO! Blamed it on the paparazzi's 📸 but by that time Mr. Fayed still honored the invite to France for her & the boys! 💡
Her brother is NO better than the Brf 🇬🇧! He betrayed her TOO! Now he's talking & 🤑cashing in on her LEGACY! #shame
💛💞🤗
@@thomasortmann41 Its TRUE! Her brother sad also - it's no security for the boys on his property. But after her death he open memorial/museum with her dresses for the tourist from hall World to making money from his beloved sister.
She clearly feared for her life. I recognize that fear in the eyes and face. So sad.
They killed her
I see more of a sly, vindictive woman out for revenge.
By the way there were at least a dozen people in the marriage when you include Diana's lovers.
You’re spot on correct
@@marigold6920 I would be vindictive too if my husband was orchestrating a smear campaign against me, through the press. Both Tom Bower & Patrick Jephson have talked about it. Patrick also did a whole podcast about it recently. And it wasn't just Charles, but his staff and his friends too. They were all ganging up against Diana.
@@myfemvideo Somehow the other side of the story had to come out.
Charles could not come out publicly and say that Diana had made his life a living nightmare could he!
That poor woman was used and abused by most people in her life!
No one ever supported her, no one ever loved her... no one ever helped her... *The eternal victim*
My God! I think we have to analyze why? Why *NOBODY* tolerated her? Not only did Charles never love her, all her lovers ended up leaving her (and there were many) Narcissistic? Toxic?
U mispelled "all" people
Don't worry she used and abused plenty people herself.
whom did she use and abuse? @@Stephanie-zd5im
@@glen7318 Almost everyone. She would cut people off in an instant if they no longer served a purpose or were no longer useful to her.
Wow! They are really putting extra effort to discredit her. The firm is a well oiled machine of wickedness and coldness
yes i agree,
💯 - what this program did isn’t hard to be lies itself. What does Bashir have to say? Poor him
The royal family has no one to blame but themselves. If Lady Diana had felt respected and protected during her marriage, she never would have felt the need to sit and give a tell all interview.
If memory serves, Diana begged Charles for refuge on the Althorp Estate, but he refused. Everyone knew the marriage would be a disaster, arranged out of desperation when the hunt for a willing and suitable broodmare proved fruitless - no one wanted to marry Charles! When Diana's sister turned him down, the palace turned once again to Diana's parents, they had a teenage daughter. It didn't take long for the extremely shy Diana to agree to marry a man she'd only met a handful of times - the promise of a fairytale life as the Princess of Wales followed by the Queen of England appealed to her romantic self.
Charles was and is a selfish, elitist hedonist. Always was. Always will be. In Camilla, he found his twin in female form.
@@pandapeep1148 The Charles she begged refuge from is her brother Charles Spencer who inherited Althorp estate.
The queen reptilian child torturing, sacraficing, blood drinking murder of multitudes and Diana is DEAD..in hell
Sarah didn’t turned Charles down, she wasn’t a virgin, she wasn’t suitable to marry Charles, Diana was.
Yes, I'm aware of that - I'm a Brit.
Princess Diana spoke the truth. So sad she was treated the way she was. She was beautiful inside and out. She died much too soon. The world still needs her light.🦋
She was telling the truth regardless of Bashir, there were three of them in her marriage to PC. That was her way of telling the her side of her marriage and why she was so unhappy, sadly she loved him with her whole heart.
No, there were about 12 in that marriage. Charles had 1 lover, and she had a lot!
@@MariaHernandez-rc2eq did you have inside news in that then. PD was picked by the Queen Mother and Diana's grandmother Lady Dermot as she didn't have a history of sleeping around, that was why PC couldnt marry Mrs Parker Bowles to provide an heir
@@cynthiarichardson4633 Nobody chose Diana to marry Charles, she was not a poor lamb taken to the slaughterhouse. Since she was a child and her sister Sarah was Charles's girlfriend, she set out to be the Princess of Wales. Sarah Spencer herself once stated that Diana as a child said *SHE WAS GOING TO BE THE PRINCESS OF WALES* Notice that no one ever heard her say that she wanted to be Charles's wife, or that she loved Charles... No, no,no!!! Her obsession was his titles....She wanted to reach the top and she didn't care that Charles had been her sister's boyfriend. How disgusting that! 🤮 Her whole family warned her that he loved Camilla and she didn't care either! They warned her that in addition to loving Camilla, he had been in a relationship with her for years and she didn't care either! Charles was honest with her and told her that he did NOT love her, and she didn't care!!!! Still got married! She wanted the crown even if it had FIRE!! Would she have married Charles if he was an ordinary man???? She knew very well what she was going for. She was never a victim and much less the naive of the story as she tried to paint it. How do you marry someone who doesn't love you? I guess the incentive was strong. To be the future Queen of Ireland, Scotland and England. Which is no small thing!
@@cynthiarichardson4633 Do some research before you go off with your ignorance.
Diana's affairs are well and truly documented.
@Mail Alias Diana had set her eyes on becoming the Princess of Wales.
As a teenager she had a poster of Charles on her wall at school.
Diana's own mother knew that Diana was in love with the idea of Charles the Prince and not Charles the man. She tried to advise Diana against marrying him for that reason.
As Diana's cousin Robert Spencer said, Diana decided to bag herself a Prince, so she bagged herself a Prince.
Matt Lauer, David Letterman, Bob Iger, Vince McMahon, Mortimer Zuckerman, Jeff Zucker, Shari Redstone, Jay Leno, Ted Turner, Rupert Murdoch, Les Moonves, John O'Hurley and Martin Bashir should be held accountable for humiliating Britney, LiLo, Amanda, Paris, Nicole, the Olsens, Demi, Miley, Janet and Princess Diana. Period.
If there’s anything that this documentary has helped to prove…. Is that that BBC interview was really necessary to be had because she got to tell her truth to the world. Shame on Charles!!
She must have said "We were 12 in that marriage, While Charles brought a lover to this relationship, I brought about 11" 🤣
This interview may have cost Diana her life. We will never know. However it was because of this Interview that the Queen was forced to order a Divorce.
If not for this interview Diana and Charles could have continued to live separate lives while continuing to do Royal Functions together occasionally and Diana could have been Queen today.
@@marigold6920 be queen for what? Live with a man who always sleep with another women.
@Maria Hernandez so u have a crush on Charles so blindly to read watch and understand...
@@marigold6920 they could not have gone on being married and living apart, indefinitely. The C of E said that they would be OK with the separation provided the couple focussed on their children, which they did and avoided affairs, which they did not. How could you have a royal couple lviing apart, seeing other lovers and then crown them king and queen>?
I think most of us in here agree , she told the truth about the hell she was living in
And that's why in England want to protect their little 👑
💯 why should we believe these people?
20:35 you can see she is almost at the brink of crying...all emotions which she had packed up for years was just gushing outt...although I'm an Indian I genuinely feel so sorry how she was isolated..
Why are there so many Indians saying "although I am an indian"? Are you not human? Such an odd thing to say.
@@user-yd4nk4lm6s Yeah, cause she was a British princess, something which supposedly shouldn't concern us...coz us Indians were totally tortured during the British reign, which makes us hate them till today. Starting from the diamond in the british crown to Kohinoor and most other jewels, which they totally looted from India, they never gave us back.... But what I wanted to say was, Princess diana was so sweet that even many of us indians loved her a lot...
It doesn't matter what colour Ur skin is👍🫶Blood and tears are all the same🦯🧫👁️💧
I wonder how Come in and park Ur balls feels she was the last romp the Prince had b4 he married LADY Diana Spencer..No more canoodling now that she's the Kings cunts hurt😂😂😂😂😂😂👑🕳️👍‼️
It doesn’t matter how bashir got Diana into that interview. The bottom line is Diana got to say what she had to and it was all Truth. It’s not like Bashir gave her some script to read to the public.
She had literally been manipulated by Bashir into losing trust in the people who protected her
As a journalist, it should have mattered. He is now an untrustworthy pig.
Diana was given the questions well in advance and she rehearsed her answers to suit her narrative.
She was in full control of the questions she would be asked.
And she was not completely honest.
It came from the heart ' she was manipulated by her family and the media.
no, she wasnt. Her brother told her that he did not think Bashir was on hte level, but foolishly Diana was taken in by him, and did the interview. Bashir did play on her paranoia. @@paulfrost8895
If only she had received just love and love alone from him, she would have survived. Lived.
nonsnese. she was divorced for a good reason, and she could have had a happy busy comfortable life as a divorced princess, had she ketp her security guards.
@@glen7318 Partly right, but again still putting the blame on Diana and still blaming Diana Now, but we the masses know the truth, That will never change, King Charles and now Queen Camila, have damaged the Royal family for ever
what are you talking about. @@jennygoddard6875
@@jennygoddard6875 you childish how do you blame Charles for all of Diana‘s bad behavior she was a grown ass woman. You keep bringing up Camilla but you forget to bring up Hewitt in the mini me and Diana had affairs with while she was married. She was the first want to cheat on him in 1985 and he left her in 1985 and went back to Camilla. If she would’ve never happened another man’s bad, she would’ve still had her husband. A man don’t become so detached mean for no reason one thing about it how I know Diana cheated first because it’s easy for a woman to give a man for cheating. That’s why she kept one in charge to come back to her, but how I know that Charles was cheated on Thursdays because he never went back to her. Men do not like taking betrayal. It’s obvious that he was her in over the marriage once she did that.
@@lacecocoa6272 That's just your opinion, are you a paid Royal troll?
Wonderful woman!!
The firm did her in. No two ways about it.
Rest in *Heaven* #DianaPrincessofWales 👸🏻❤️
I never did like that guy. Especially after the MJ interview. They edit to twist things and make celebs look crazy.
MJ made himself look nasty
@@pinkpugginz Your opinion. Not mine.
Bashir is yuk but so is MJ.
Oh really, is that how you justify his blatantly obvious pedophilia . Wow
In my opinion, all BBC "investigators" are complicit in that no one asked/pressed Bashir for the answer as to why he fabricated the documents because they knew there could be no acceptable ethical answer to that question, and the BBC would have to take action and be held accountable for the fraud Bashir perpetrated on the Spencer and Diana for his own agenda/career advancement.
This so scary. If the royals weren’t in on it behind the scenes she wouldn’t have believed him in the first place. She obviously believed this stranger for a reason. I think this stuff really was happening to her, but from the inside. From people supposed to be protecting her, and keeping her safe.
Diana suffered with paranoia. Even William said that Bashir had played on her paranoia. Not that he had caused it but indicating that his mother already suffered with paranoia.
Diana was surrounded by people who wanted to help her but she had
pushed them all away and she would never take advice.
@@marigold6920 that would be so hard. I understand her being paranoid. How do you trust, and take help from people/a family who are also trying to keep you in a pretty box.
Charles wasnt' that good at taking advice either. Some of his friends have said that they told him they weren't sure Diana was the right girl for him and he went ahead and married her. Hegot very annoyed with a lady who told him she didnt think his interview was a good idea. @@marigold6920
@@marigold6920 No royal son would do that
what are you on about? WIlliam did refer to Diana as being paranoid and said that Bashir's lies had provoked her to become more paranoid and unsettled. He would like the Bashir interview not to be shown again as he feels it was obtained wiht lies.@@jennygoddard6875
Diana knew, she clearly said they were planning a car accident. And they did. HARRY KNOWS
what does he know?
@@glen7318 what Diana told her son, why do you think he left the UK with his family to live in another country, for the safety of course
please dont talk so silly. Harry and Meghan wanted to stay part time in the royal family, and spend the rest of their time in America making money. They were told that they could not be half in ad half out of the RF and then they otped for full time money making. that is well known. @@jennygoddard6875
@@jennygoddard6875safety??? He moved to the media shit hole of the country. The cesspool of California reporters.
So convenient
@@jennygoddard6875 He spends 4 million a year on security too. I am sure whatever he knows he has written down with instructions upon his death it to be released. That is the real reason he is still here. As far as what Diaan told him, he was 12 when she died. you make her sound crazier than they try to paint her. Harry has found out on his own.
Poor Diana, He used her! A Man without his word is NOTHING! Shame on Bashir!!!! A Journalist should be someone you trust. Bashir has blood on his hands
Her brother is a disgusting traitor. I know now why she mistrusted him and never went to him for help.
Unfortunately, her brother changes the story right because Charles had been the king, and he is trying to lick his boots
If anyone knew the real Diana very well, it was her family! Her family knew her very well and they know that she was not the sweet little dove that she appeared to be. With her cousin Fergie she had broken off relations and did not speak to her... When she died she hadn't talked to her sister Jane for a year...Diana didn't want to know anything about her sister! She had also cut off her relationship with her own mother because the mother had asked her to stop behaving like a whore with so many lovers, and she asked her to think about her children who lived in shame!
Diana swore never to speak to her mother again and so she did.
@@srenevanderlugt465 What has Charles Spencer said?
She did go to him for help, do you not know?
@@glen7318
Everything except the truth.
Regardless of how Martin got the interview, Diana still said what she said, he did not tell her what to say, so I don't see what this video is trying to do, she told her truth and that's the end of
The video is trying to distract people away from what Diana said - the facts. It's trying to pivot the conversation away from what tools the Royal Family are and why they shouldn't still be given a dime of taxpayer money, let alone influence. They want to rewrite history and erase Diana. This interview was the most damning information and out of her own mouth, so they've seen to it that we can't see it in its entirety anymore. Andrew Morton's book will be the next thing they'll go after. Of course, most people don't read books anymore, so they know that's not as much of a threat.
Well said!!!!!
Well said
Its trying and succeeding with many dumbed down idiots who have been conditioned to receive suggestion to the point of actually causing them to ignore or dismiss OBVIOUS Truth.
The queen reptilian child torturing, sacraficing, blood drinking murder of multitudes and Diana is DEAD..in hell
It was the deceitful way he got the interview,of course it matters how he got the interview,it just shows the deceitful path he will take to get what he wants.
I’m glad Diana was able to tell her truth before she had a most unfortunate “accident” in a Paris tunnel. He’s given her a voice after she was silenced
total truths - i dread to imagine what went on in that palace and what continues to happen
I didn't know about this until I saw The Crown. I was shocked and had to look it up to see if it was true because it just seemed too out there.
watching how the media and paparazzi Treated Princess Diana really Fuels a Deep Hatred of that Profession if you can call it that
The BBC & that Building - I hold no respect for them. I wonder why there is no real discussion about what Diana was actually daring to say openly(at such personal risk).
the fact that they covered up for Jimmy Saville is the reddest flag
@@jade5202 Yes, deliberate & many years of cover.
At 8:37 when Diana says “there’s no better way to dismantle a personality than to isolate it”, I instantly thought of Megan and what she is doing to harry. She’s taken Diana’s own words and is using it to her own advantage.
You are a sick person.
Knew all the royal secrets!!! Bless you.
Charles and Camilla used her since day one. Richard Parker-Bowles, brother of Camilla's ex-husband Andrew, was quoted by the Mail Sunday newspaper as saying his sister-in-law saw Diana as easy to manipulate. She initially encouraged the relationship between Charles and Diana because she thought Diana was gormless (stupid). Over the years, Camilla did intimate to him that she thought Diana was either half-witted or quite mad. He said he felt sorry for Diana, adding: "The fact is that if Camilla had been a child on the beach, she would have knocked other children's sand castles down. She is a wrecker at heart. She doesn't like to see other people happy."
I just googled Richard Parker-Bowles. What I read knocked my socks off. She, the mistress, allegedly slept with Diana's fiance the week before their wedding and the night before their wedding, allegedly according to Richard. WTF!!! And they are now King and Queen and Head of the Church. Yikes !!!
@@jasminetyana2426 nonsnese.
@@glen7318 How do you know it's nonsense. Because it doesn't suit your agenda ????
@@jasminetyana2426 how does a brother in law know if Camilla slept with someone the night before his wedding? THe night before the wedding Camilla was with her own husband at a regimental function
@@jasminetyana2426 Great reply, Glen always slags of Diana
7:11 she says, that she would not have been gone out of the royal family _quiet_ . So they would not let her simply go😮
Might have been a wretched way to get the interview but the truth is the truth. It does not change the validity and value of the truth. This interview is a blueprint of the Firm and RF behinds the scenes.
Princess Diana is my patron saint. My mom and i used to collect Diana stamps when we could still afford it and ive alwaus felt such a strong connection to her. I was only 2 when she died and it still makes me cry 😭😭😭
I feel the same way when I watch videos on you tube, I cried this morning watching one.
How can she be your patron Saint she was no saint she may have been beautiful and done a lot of good but she was no Saint
What connection ?
It's not deceived... It's the truth she has reveled.. Whatever he did not ask her to say that. She said that from her heart
RIP Princess. Will always be remembered.
What’s so sad is she was so young when she married charles and she truly did love him. He didn’t love her. He loved someone else. He knew better she didn’t. She was fooled into thinking she was going to live happily ever after. It’s really sad that they forced people to marry certain types of partners because that’s what royals did. She never deserved anything that happened to her and I was so happy when she got away. What is so sad is when she was finally happy she died. I applaud Harry for walking away. His mother would also have been proud of him.
Queen Diana..is a beautiful person inside and out. At her early age of marriage She is dignified person.thats why she is loved by many.people for.all walks of life.
She wasn't the queen.🙄
@@irenemorley75people can call her that if they want.
Omg this man is exactly what we need everywhere! I thank you so much for your service and I hope it inspires others to be like you!
Regardless of means of securing interview, what Diana went through was real & very true. Charles was having an affair with Camilla, he ill treated Diana. So what the interview was secured by wrongful means the truth would have come out anyway sooner or later.
nonsense!
@@genevieveassamoi4840 Yes, your answer is.
I'm glad Diana did it :)
I think what he did was wrong, very wrong but I think it played very well in Diana’s favor because she got to tell her story before she passed.
Princess Diana had been used..
It’s sad that now people say things like she’s a bed hopper and she cheated on Charles first. She sacrificed herself by putting her words to sound like she cheated first when she had proof before they got married that he was with Camilla before their engagement. How dirty it was that Charles thought he had the right to come out with the truth about what Diana was paranoid about. Doing that he caused Camilla’s husband to go ahead and divorce her and the Queen made him and Diana divorce. I don’t think Diana would have been able to move forward to marry whoever she wanted because she was the mother of future kings. An heir and a spare. Camilla, because Diana died now sits on the throne Diana should be on. It’s something how she said she wouldn’t be Queen. She knew. The clean up of the BBC error didn’t do much for Diana but it gave Charles a chance to be with his true love
Everybody know Charles cheated first. He couldn't keep his words on Camilla's titles.
@@trishamathias5563 what are you on about
@@trishamathias5563 Charles didn’t do anything with the titles. By law, the wife of the king is the queen. Queen consort is not a title. It is a role description, differentiating a king’s wife from a queen regnant such as Queen Elizabeth II. Queen Elizabeth wished that Camilla be queen consort, rather than Princess Consort as had been previously announced. A Queen consort’s title is Her Majesty The Queen (or informally HM Queen (name). So in calling our new queen Her Majesty The Queen (or informally, HM Queen Camilla), Elizabeth’s wishes have been precisely followed.
@@jrimpau The palace released a statement when they married that Camila would be princess consort at the queen's death because of their divorces being against church of England beliefs. Many believe the title only changed when the dying queen struck a deal with Charles to protect the disgraced Andrew. Why do you think Andrew is still in Royal Lodge and not Frogmore cottage as your king mandated back in the spring? Charles tried to boot him, but Andrew had the leverage. If Andrew got booted from the Lodge, he said he would write a tell all book. Which would mean Camilla would have to revert to princess consort.
@@peachygal4153 the statement they released was that it was their "intention" that she be known as princess consort. (They didn't say anything about the reason.) But the announcement had no force of law, and "intentions" can change. Indeed, there is no legal nor historical precedent for the title of princess consort. By law, the wife of the King is The Queen. It would take a literal act of Parliament to change it, and the agreement of all 14 realms would be required as well. The late queen had absolutely no power to mandate titles for a future king's wife. Thus, there did not need to be any agreement with Charles and Andrew, because by law, Camilla could not "revert to princess consort". Barring action by Parliament, it was inevitable that Camilla would one day become Queen from the moment Charles slipped the ring on her finger.
The interview that came out of this subterfuge was meaningful and I believe saved lives that were suffering with eating disorders,depression,and abandonement.While the story is interesting in detail,it is not surprising in any way.Lady Diana has always had my respect for her honesty in the platform provided to her,and then Prince Charles deserved this disclosure and a lot more as far as I'm concerned.
In short,this is an interesting non-story.
Why is Martin Bashir not in jail?! He is not just unethical and deceitful, what he did was also criminal.
Where can I watch the full interview of Princess Diana??
please tag me when or if you find it🙏🏾🙏🏾
@@ayomideayoola3522 it's on Daily Motion. Just watched it.
However they got to the interview ( which was deceitful) she was telling her side. I believe her.
Yes, all we know is HER side. She knew that the royal family would never go public and tell THEIR side of the story. So basically she could tell whatever she wanted, nobody would contradict her. Never complain, never explain.
They never go public and tell THEIR side of the story? Read Spare, the Palace has the Press
@@iceprincess3981how naive do you have to be to believe that? lmao they control the media in the uk and camilla is friends with several columnists including the sun and dailymail, two media networks that dedicate most of their time to badmouthing diana TO THIS DAY. they will never go public and talk about it, but they send their lackeys instead.
Camilla's ex-husband's brother has already spoken about how thirsty she's for media attention, Harry has already said that she's not afraid of "leaving bodies in the street" to stay on top and Diana's friends, including former employees, have already said that a campaign against her was being made in the 90s to try to boost Charles's popularity and introduce Camilla to the world.
On the princess's death anniversaries they always find a way to bring something defamatory about her and try to make Charles and Camilla a big deal. when charles was crowned a commentator was on TV talking about how diana would like to see camilla as queen LMAO how can ANYONE see/read this and not think they're the villains?
Until that incident, no one at the BBC had ever deceived anyone. 🤣
😂😂😂😂
PRINCESS DIANA SPOKE THE TRUTH. YOU CAN SEE HOW SHE IS SUFFERING HER LOOKS HAVE CHANGED HER SAD EYES 😢❤
I find it odd it didn't come out prior .... We know who wanted her gone ... Fact ... So it all boils down to .... 🙄🙄😥😢
Precisely. Martin Bashir wanted the story. He was unscrupulous in getting it. No surprise there. That's what many journalists do. But it doesn't take away from what she said...which the Royal Family have finally gotten the BBC to remove so that history can be rewritten in favor of them.
who? who wanted her gone?
@@someonelol69 your kidding...
She was murdered by those whose secrets she knew all about....
Secrets she never got to tell in public
@@someonelol69the queen and Charles! Like duh!
@@kelly_villalobos yes I agree
Diana said M.I.5 would "Arrange an accident while driving" I don't know if they did but she was becoming a "danger" to the Realm.
Just by her fame and love by the British people, she was and still is in the UK, even in death did that make The the Realm jealous?
Yes she knew what was coming and she was spot on,
so why did she not take precautions such as using her Protection officers and using her own car at all times?@@jennygoddard6875
Diana had a 'thing' about MI5 - she thought they had staged a hit on Barry Manakee - when Georgie Campbell asked Diana if she really believed MI5 would employ a 17yr old novice driver to take part in a 'hit' on a serving Metropolitan Police Officer - Diana didn't even know the details. By the way Diana's accident was in Paris, France, it's MI6 who work in foreign countries
Bashir did it to himself he's sleezy even with M.J. interview but M.J. was smart he had his own team filming as they filmed him being filmed!!!!😂
Who is here after the crown trailer?
"Not lies but half truths" That's what liars tell you
Love for you forever Lady Di God bless. She was real no matter what some people are saying about her. Her heart was genuine, she was honest and full of love for humanity ❤❤. God bless her for eternity.
Is it any wonder that Prince Harry feels like he does. He has been surrounded by palace intrigue, and reporters all his life. Then he brings home his bride, and her presence starts his mother's ordeal all over again in his mind. They don't like my bride, they (the royals) didn't like mum. His unsettled mind and heart started to roil with conspiracy and resentment. He's the spare, and now because of his new wife, the outsider. I need to get ahead of this, protect myself and Megan. It's just so sad for Harry and William. There whole life has been turmoil from birth till now.
🎯🎯💯
Facts
@@lacecocoa6272 Plus if they did not want a future king to have a half sibling of mixed race I am sure they aren't happy about a niece and nephew of mixed race for that same future king. Or for that matter, the current king having grandchildren of mixed race. You can bet your bottom dollar Harry has it all written out with instructions it be released if he or his children or wife suddenly have an "accident." One thing for sure if there was any truth to Hewitt being Harry's bio father the palace would have that released that by now. It would be the perfect way to permanently get rid of Harry and also to blacken Diana's name forever. All the nasty rumors have not been able to do that, but genuine proof would cause her memory serious harm.
Bashire did well getting truth out
REST IN PEACE🙏💖
PRINCESS DIANA.
WE MISSED YOU...❤
I PRAY TO ALMIGHTY GOD, WILL PUNISHED TO THOSE WHO HURTS YOU!😢
AMEN.🙏
He did totally go about that interview in a deceptive way, but clearly the princess needed this interview as did the world and it is history right here that we are watching in the comments that she made told us all we need to know about the royal family… quite frankly I don’t think they should even exist as Royals. They think they are an upper class citizens above, and better than any other humans and I find them despicable, and they truly crushed her soul!❤
I don't understand WHY they are bashing bashire??? He did a really good interview
Are you serious? People are bashing him because he falsified documents that got him into Diana's circle, and ultimately to Princess Diana herself. He lied about the government spying on her, lied about her head of security stating that he was also spying and selling info about Diana, lied to her brother about the same things and evidently this resulted in the Princess' increased anxiety and furthered her fears about the monarchy and their involvement in her ultimate demise . So yes he ABSOLUTELY deserved to be bashed by society.( In my opinion, he got off way too easy ! ) Despite the fact that she desperately needed to tell the world the real truth behind her struggles, he still should have been charged with the crimes he committed against Diana, her family and her security team. He betrayed her the same way many people in her life had already done so. Although the interview was therapeutic for the Princess, Bashier used her weakness and vulnerability to further his career, and despite the pain he caused Diana and her family he never took a smidge of responsibility for his actions.
@@mirkat-wr4be was it therapeutic to drive her to more suspicion of her in laws, her staff and everyone in her life, including her own son? to lead her to say something foolish about Charles and the succession which puhsed the queen to insist on a divorce.
@@mirkat-wr4be That's true, I agree with you
Her story needed to be told. And she deserved to heard. TRULY heard. Deceit or not. Fake or not. But her pain def was not fake. He knew that. How else would he be able to get it? In the end she got to live her life more on her terms and speak her truth. RIP Diana. Forever the royal of royals.
Yeah they totally murked her. Makes total sense as to why the redheaded son left that mess & brought his wife to the U.S. now. Didn't want to crash in a tunnel with his last vision being a blinding MI6 light before a 110 minute ambulance ride to a hospital 4 miles away.
You think any of these idiots can pick up on your implications?
Just say it...
The queen reptilian child torturing, sacraficing, blood drinking murder of multitudes and Diana is DEAD..in hell.
That’s right, you said at all.
nonsense
Martin Bashir was the end of Michael Jackson too. Same thing. Ended in death