2:14 This has to be wrong. 45kg of plant food is way too little for a brontosaurus. Even a modern elephant eats about 200-300 kgs of plant food each day.
GODᴇᴘɪᴄᴇʟʟ dinosaurs aren’t reptiles reptiles are their ancestors as they are ours but dinosaurs are within their own group(s) for example if ceratopsians for example triceratops it would be amphibians,reptiles mammals fish birds and ceratopsians
Elephants suck at digesting their food, that's why they eat so much. In fact their young will often eat their mother's poop because so little of the eaten food was digested, making it a good source of energy. What if a Brontosaurus didn't suck at digesting the plant matter? 45kg is still pretty small, though...
@@The_Scouts_Code obviously not. Why would a it require 45x more food than an elephant? Brontosaurus weighed approx 3x more than an elephant and probably ate about 1.8x more, ie. 180kg of food (long necks meant they could stay in one place and move necks, so little energy consumption required). That's assuming elephants actually consume 100kg, that figure for elephants is likely inaccurate as I've seen very different figures.
@@sid6554 . Among the inaccuracies shown at the above posted video; the minimum 45Kg per day figure, for an Argentinosaurus for example; in order to be able to barely survive; provided some daily access to a bit of drinking water, as well... Is correct. Since for the already found out, fossilized ancient huge body size, regarding some the formerly Sauropod subspecies... Was a natural mutation that: most probably appeared and endured; due to a former real "lack of food safety supply;" that used to bug the lives of most Sauropods that lived back in then, about 70M years ago. Therefore, an Argentinossaurus, was most probably capable of eating about 1 ton of food in just one seat; and then be able to survive and endure: with only about 45Kg of food, for each of his next 17 seats. Also, the Huge body size of certain Sauropods, was consistent with a semi-aquatic life; a bit like the nowadays largest individual anacondas; that: almost never go too far away from a certain set of river streams; in order to prevent the Earths strong gravity, from pressurising too much their body functional parts. Being that the most bluntly inaccuracy of the above posted video; is the broken wrists posture, shown by the depicted raptor like, dinos.
0:47 "they weren't much bigger than a giraffe..." it's twice the size XD 1:23 "most of them weren't very big" that's like 1,200 pounds of armored flesh XD
0:41 Dilophosaurus didn’t have the killing claws on its feet, and was at most 7 meters long. 0:46 “Prosauropods” evolved during the Triassic, not the Jurassic. 1:29 Triceratops and Stegosaurus were closer to 9 meters long. 1:59 The longest sauropods grew over 30 meters. 2:50 Dreadnoughtus really wasn’t as big as other Titanosaurs, maybe in weight not in actual size. It was only to 25 meters long, while Argentinosaurus and Patagotitan at both around 35 meters. Dreadnoughtus wasn’t even in the top 10 longest sauropods. 2:58 None of those specific sauropods (except maybe Dreadnoughtus) lived to the end of the Cretaceous to see the asteroid strike. Not to mention the pronated hands, and Brontosaurus definitely ate more than 45 kg of food each day. That is how much I weigh (I’m skinny), they would’ve eaten at least a few hundred kilograms. Plus, Tyrannosaurus wasn’t twice the length of Triceratops and Stegosaurus, it was 12-13 meters long.
Edit: "Everything changed when the volcano attacked." This is a quote, I mixed together from a tv show called ATLA, and the clip shown from this video. Wowie. what I believe doesn't matter in this context. this was all just a play on words, from this UA-cam video and a cartoon TV show.
Small correction; Prosauropods weren't direct ancestors to "true" Sauropods, but rather a more distant branch of the sauropodomorph clade. While it is true that Sauropods evolved from smaller, bipedal Dinosaurs, Prosauropods did not proceed the typical sauropods as implied by the video. IIRC, "Prosauropod" is an outdated term. The more modern term for similar looking bipedal Sauropodomorphs would be "Platiosaurids".
See, I can generally forgive the general cartoonish designs for the sake of presentation. I don't think these were meant to be accurate visually, but I would like to know more if you feel there is more info that this video got wrong.
@@MysticMindAnalysis they could be cartoonish and still accurate.. but this looks like totally lack of research. No feathers? Pronated hands? Dilophosaurus with raptor claws? Seriously? It's too much
If I had the animating skills I would make accurate dinosaur videos, but I’m fourteen merp, but I am good at art so much might just do my demonstrations in drawing them
Why does the Dilophosaurus have sickle-shaped claws, since when were they dromaeosaurids?, Why aren't their any protofeathers, this is so Inaccurate, especially with their broken wrists. I thought this was supposed to be an educational channel. Edit: 1. About the protofeathers thing, I was going on to say, if your gonna make one thing inaccurate why not due to the whole thing completely. 2. There was a guy saying something about going against science, but I what meant to say is that for example, the whole scaly or feathered T-rex debate was not really necessary, although I may be wrong, my point is, I argue for biomechanics, for example, the argument for elephants or whatnot, the reason they don't reassemble mammoths or possess large coats of fur/hair is that it would provide no purpose with the current environment, which they correlate with, also, in addition, there was an article or studies explaining biomechanics in certain animals (disclaimer I maybe over paraphrasing or saying something wrong, so feel free to correct) I think there was a certain size limit to which feathers/hair/fur would no longer be necessary for Sarah/ desert or tropical environments, due to tot eh biomechanics of the animal, which may include certain things like heat circulation, but I am not entirely sure. But I just wanted to clarify my stance, in addition to supporting my claim, "Saurin" the Kickstarter game for a scientifically accurate dinosaur survival game, have researched a conclusion similar to mine, Ben G. Thomas made a video about this, so go check it out: ua-cam.com/video/pG5sbVN3tI8/v-deo.html
The Truth useless? Feathers can be used for attracting mates, scaring off potential predators, camouflage, challenging rival males, etc. Just like today birds, its likely a lot of dinosaurs uses feathers for this feature. While not all theropods is coated from head to toe by feathers, all of them have feathers in some form. Just like how elephants, even whales have hairs.
Not necessarily true at all, carnotaurus and other members of it family most likely didn't have feathers, no evidence for spinosaurs having feathers, and extremely early theropods such as eorapter probably didnt have them. Not All Theropods had feathers, its possible for them to have them up there is not direct evidence for it.
@@pablocuin7295 Sometimes you do not need evidence for some certain cases, yes spinosaurids had no feathers because their more like crocodilians and much for reptillian than avian. And Abielasaurids had shortened arms and tough armoured skin and squared heads.
Minor corrections, 1, theropods hands faced inward not backwards. 2, dilophosaurus didn’t have a sickle claw as it wasn’t a dromaeosaurid (true raptor). Oh and some theropods such as t-rex had feathers.
@@alanchihak6369 Yes. Oviraptorosaurs, Ornithomimosaurs, Dromaeosaurs, Proceratosaurids and Therizinosaurs had feathers. Theropods such as Megalosaurids and Spinosaurids did not had feathers.
actually there is no evidence that t rex had feathers (other than dromaeosaurids and other small dinosaurs) because all fossil skin imprints of t rex and it fellow relatives (tyranosaurids) did not have feathers and instead scales an in areas like the back so there is no evidence of t rex having feathers . just a friendly fact :)
@DARVIN BAROI dont be a jerk: 1 i dont play roblox anymore i play the isle. 2 i never said t rex definitely did not have feathers because yutyrannus did, im saying that there is not allot of proof
@@CoreyMillionaire2029 in terms of carnivores and their strength Tyrannosaurus is still the king but in terms of sheer size that would be argentinasaurus
Actually some Triassic dinosaurs already got pretty big. Melanorosaurus gew to be about 10 meters long, making it one of the biggest land animals of the Triassic, and Herrerasaurus was one of the largest predators (after rauisuchians) at 6 meters long.
@@titanosaurgaming3000 Bo Siglimassasaurus is the largest Theropod Amphicoelias is the largest Sauropod Torosaurus is the largest Ceratopsian Ankylosaurus is the largest Ankylosaurid and Bone armour dinosaur Allosaurid - Epanterias is the largest Allosaurid Neovenator is the largest Neovenatorid Giganotosaurus is the largest Carcharodontosaurid
@@kkvnair3201 T. Rex is the largest theropod with a weight (in nature seize is determined by mass not height or length) with upper estimates about 11 tons.
Spinosaurus was in the Cretaceous not the Triassic. And it’s thought to have been mainly a fish eater. Also recent evidence suggests that T Rex was 70 percent bigger than originally thought and if this is true it was bigger than Spinosaurus.
A few small corrections Should not have probated hands for the theropods T Rex needs at least minimal amounts of feathers (Not just a few quills but rather coverage of part of the body) Triceratops and Stegosaurus could grow to 9 meters long and why are mentioned by the video to be puny? They weren’t that long but still triceratops and a few other ceratopsians grew over 8 tons in weight! Upper estimates of triceratops weight is 12 tons! Why does some of the sauropods in the animation look like a modern Charles knight 1920s painting sauropods (Mainly pointed at the apatosaurus) the neck should be at a more horizontal angle, tail lifted better above the ground and less stocky legs. Anatomical proportions are not the best. Finally, titanosaurus like patagotitan, puertasaurus and argentinosaurus were not 20 meters long they could be over 30 meters long and 20 meters tall. Patagotitan was measured to be 122 feet long so that specimen is easily 37 meters. Despite this, over all it was a nice video.
@@alanchihak6369 Tyrannosaurids and Tyrannosauroids are different, Yutyrannus, Guanlong and Dilong were feathered but they were included in the superfamily... Tyrannosauroidea and were more basal... (That 'o' makes a big difference) While The the more derived ones like Tarbosaurus, T.rex and Daspletosaurus belong to the family Tyrannosauridae a branch of the superfamily mentioned early and so far there has been no evidence of feathers in Tyrannosauridae... But yeah it's too early to discard the possibility of feathers
Though I agree with Ethan Yao on rest of the points, also the narrator Shud have specified about the Cretaceous period she just lumped Triceratops and Stegosaurus together... They might have been similar in size but Triceratops and T.rex were closer to us in time than they were to Allosaurus and Stegosaurus...
Spinosaurus is a very underrated dinosaur unfortunately. I knew what a trex was when I was 4 years old but i found out that what spinosaurus was when I was 19. Spinosaurus is very underrated
In my opinion, spinosaurus is the best largestest carnivore. I think it could beat a trex with its massive sharp claws. Also sarcosucas, Spion could bite into it and use its giant arms and hands to tear it apart
@@carljohnsoncj6896 ohh jp3 fan listen man sure the spinosaurus is cool in jp3 but in real life its a fishy boy and if trex and spino ever meet it would die like die The trex had 8000 ibs and spino had 4200 bite force a bite from Tyrannosaurus rex would rip of spinosaurus neck...Sorry man...... And spinosaurus lived in africa and trex lived in north america sure both lived in cretaceous but spinosaurus lived in early cretaceous and trex lived in sooner cretaceous so they never meet
Planet Earth spinosaurus had arms the size of elephant legs with claws that could rip apart dinosaurs. Trex arms were just bigger than human arms. Bite force isn’t everything. Trex weighs around 8,000kg and spinosaurus weighs 15,000kg It’s larger Bigger Has useable claws that are sharp as katana swords.
Did anyone else notice how the video stated that brontosaurus is 26 meters, while the argentinosaurus which is supposed to be bigger is 20 meters long, when they're supposed to be bigger? It seems contradictory here... (Note, the correct measurements are that brontosaurus is 21 - 23 meters long while the argentinosaurus is 22 - 33.5 meters long...)
People might underestimate Argentinosaurus at times, but that thing is huge. It could be 35 mtrs in length, maybe some older individual would've reached up to 40! Avg weight is around 75 metric tons, but some say it could've reached 100 metric tons and in terms of height it could've been almost 20 mtrs in height! It's almost 4-5 times taller than an avg T Rex. The 1954 Godzilla was like 50 mtrs in height, this thing is 20, basically 40% the height of Godzilla. This Dinosaur was biggest of the biggest.
This is why i love long necked dinosaur they are my favorites Idk what is the really big long necked But my fav is brachiosaurus now my new fav is argentinosaurus
@@ghosty_bruh It is. There is no "tbh" or not. Unless new papers by paleontologists come out, Brontosaurus will remain as its own genus/species. btw a quick google search could've easily told you the answer.
and also y'all people that are complaining about the " art " and the anatomy need to shut your mouths and listen to what it's saying like seriously calm down it's not supposed to be extremely realistic, and besides, we never will know what the dinosaurs looked like.
@@supergayboy445 Dinosaurs arent ancestors to birds birds did existed during the time of Dinosaurs & every Dinosaurs died 65 million years ago there wasnt any surviving Non Bird Dinosaur
45 kg is pretty small for a sauropod that size.. also, sauropods didn’t hold their necks up like that. They would need an extremely powerful heart for that. And it would take a lot more than 45 kg for energy to hold that neck up.
Oh and I do want to mention one thing. The brachiosaurids would have likely held their necks somewhat vertically (something referred to as an S-curved pose), due to having their forelimbs longer than their hind limbs and a few other reasons, and yes they would have had very powerful hearts, estimated at 400 kg in weight, and needing double the blood pressure of a giraffe to reach the brain. Where the video went wrong it’s with its depiction of Brontosaurus. Brontosaurus did not have a vertical neck, it would have been quite more horizontal.
no, you’re more incorrect than he was. brontosaurus is part of the diplodocid family whereas brachiosaurus is a macronian (i think that’s what it is). And yes brontosaurus is its own genus now
I didn't know only prehistoric animal geniuses were welcome in the comments I just came here to say what my favorite dinosaur is *It's the Brachiosaurus by the way*
I love how everyone in this comment section is suddenly an expert on dinosaurs lol. Not doubting that the video's wrong, I believe y'all, but it's kind of funny.
I think I speak for most people when I say that it's annoying when every dinosaur video has a comparison to Tyrannosaurus, even if it's not even remotely related.
I do not think at all that Steven Brusatte would approve of these inaccuracies! Prosauropods arent direct ancestors of sauropods, I beleive they are now called Plateosaurids and things like them gave rise to the immense sauropods!
@@justawildgengar yeah :) also I feel bad for Nedry when it killed it, cause Nedey didnt do anything on purpose, hammond yelled at him for no reason and that's why he stole the DNA
2:14 This has to be wrong. 45kg of plant food is way too little for a brontosaurus. Even a modern elephant eats about 200-300 kgs of plant food each day.
lol
GODᴇᴘɪᴄᴇʟʟ dinosaurs aren’t reptiles reptiles are their ancestors as they are ours but dinosaurs are within their own group(s) for example if ceratopsians for example triceratops it would be amphibians,reptiles mammals fish birds and ceratopsians
GODᴇᴘɪᴄᴇʟʟ even if you were right about them being cold blooded, you’re still talking about creatures that are the height of small buildings
Elephants suck at digesting their food, that's why they eat so much. In fact their young will often eat their mother's poop because so little of the eaten food was digested, making it a good source of energy. What if a Brontosaurus didn't suck at digesting the plant matter? 45kg is still pretty small, though...
@@MosasaurMosasaur yeah but remember that most of their size comes from their tails and necks, while their body is the one that uses the most energy
Business insider: Brontosaurus need 45kgs of food per day.
David Attenborough: Elephants need at least 100kgs of food daily to survive!
Yeah that soft out to me too. Did they mean 4-5 tons?
@@The_Scouts_Code obviously not. Why would a it require 45x more food than an elephant? Brontosaurus weighed approx 3x more than an elephant and probably ate about 1.8x more, ie. 180kg of food (long necks meant they could stay in one place and move necks, so little energy consumption required).
That's assuming elephants actually consume 100kg, that figure for elephants is likely inaccurate as I've seen very different figures.
@@sid6554 . Among the inaccuracies shown at the above posted video; the minimum 45Kg per day figure, for an Argentinosaurus for example; in order to be able to barely survive; provided some daily access to a bit of drinking water, as well... Is correct.
Since for the already found out, fossilized ancient huge body size, regarding some the formerly Sauropod subspecies... Was a natural mutation that: most probably appeared and endured; due to a former real "lack of food safety supply;" that used to bug the lives of most Sauropods that lived back in then, about 70M years ago. Therefore, an Argentinossaurus, was most probably capable of eating about 1 ton of food in just one seat; and then be able to survive and endure: with only about 45Kg of food, for each of his next 17 seats.
Also, the Huge body size of certain Sauropods, was consistent with a semi-aquatic life; a bit like the nowadays largest individual anacondas; that: almost never go too far away from a certain set of river streams; in order to prevent the Earths strong gravity, from pressurising too much their body functional parts.
Being that the most bluntly inaccuracy of the above posted video; is the broken wrists posture, shown by the depicted raptor like, dinos.
For those wondering, sauropods were not semi aquatic. Ignore the guy above me.
Reptiles have different metabolic rates.
“.....they parked themselves in one spot for hours........the more they sat around & ate, the bigger they became”
*sounds like us Americans*
😂
Only americans are tiny
Or you mean weight
“U.S. Americans”? You sound stupid af
@@fourdubs4 Us as in we/us. How is saying U.S. Americans dumb? It differentiate the U.S. Americans from Latin Americans and other Americans. 🙄
A small correction; They stood and ate. Not sat. :D
0:47 "they weren't much bigger than a giraffe..." it's twice the size XD 1:23 "most of them weren't very big" that's like 1,200 pounds of armored flesh XD
0:41 Dilophosaurus didn’t have the killing claws on its feet, and was at most 7 meters long.
0:46 “Prosauropods” evolved during the Triassic, not the Jurassic.
1:29 Triceratops and Stegosaurus were closer to 9 meters long.
1:59 The longest sauropods grew over 30 meters.
2:50 Dreadnoughtus really wasn’t as big as other Titanosaurs, maybe in weight not in actual size. It was only to 25 meters long, while Argentinosaurus and Patagotitan at both around 35 meters. Dreadnoughtus wasn’t even in the top 10 longest sauropods.
2:58 None of those specific sauropods (except maybe Dreadnoughtus) lived to the end of the Cretaceous to see the asteroid strike.
Not to mention the pronated hands, and Brontosaurus definitely ate more than 45 kg of food each day. That is how much I weigh (I’m skinny), they would’ve eaten at least a few hundred kilograms. Plus, Tyrannosaurus wasn’t twice the length of Triceratops and Stegosaurus, it was 12-13 meters long.
And only like 10 people saw this lol
Patagotitan is 37 m and Argentinosaurus is 39.7 m
Nice job
tbh i could already tell this video was inaccurate just by the hands.
I believe you're mistaken about the Titanosaurs not living to the End of the Cretaceous. They've got poop lol
0:40 Dilophosaurs Raptor claw???
não temos nada pra fazer yeah i notice that too...
Noticed that too. Dilo's didn't have those claws like that.
Looks like they referenced a Jurassic Park version of the velociraptor with the incorrect height and bent fingers.
Lmao
If you look closely, it even has 2 pairs of hook claws on each foot..
The biggest dinosaur of my childhood was Barney
**I regret everything**
coke 4 I worked on that show and I can tell the cast (David, Jeff and Jeff) and crew were all amazing people. I really miss it.
coke 4 stole my comment
children: biggest dinousaur "Barney"
Teens: biggest dinosaur "T Rex" (Teen Rex XD)
Adults: GODZILLLLAAAAAA
coke 4 the biggest dinosaur of my childhood was the man who lived in the laundry I used to talk to him ever night
What about Baby bop TJ and cousin Riff
Edit: "Everything changed when the volcano attacked." This is a quote, I mixed together from a tv show called ATLA, and the clip shown from this video. Wowie. what I believe doesn't matter in this context. this was all just a play on words, from this UA-cam video and a cartoon TV show.
lol
Q1qqqá
Haha
@JACKSON RODRIGUEZ that is a possibility not trutg
Not volcano, it's meteor.
Stop the madness
I got a heart attack when I saw the accuracy of those dinosaurs
Same bro
None of these are accurate
Except dilophosurus
@@brightyboy9445 That’s what he was saying
@@brightyboy9445 Bruh, that's the most inaccurate one.
0:42 DILOPHOSAURUS DID NOT HAVE CURVED CLAWS ON THEIR FEET
Correct
New hybrid confirmed?
And where is the poison spitting power of that thing?
@@yuuyjaaj6721 the frill is only in jurassic park
@@LightninClawZ and also the poison that's also a Jurrasic Park thing
and the broken hands
The inaccuracy of the art used for these Dino's is pissing me off personally.
me too
Shylo x Fading 770 me to
Brontosaurus is also totally a thing. THaT AinT OUTdaTEd
Same
Same
this entire video is wrong
there's too much to correct im not gonna bother
Says a dino sim fan
@@thesnailycatye1333 that has nothing to do with this
Starting with dinosaurs WITHOUT FEATHERS >:c
Miguel Mif not all dinosaurs had feathers
Well you could not make any better
Small correction; Prosauropods weren't direct ancestors to "true" Sauropods, but rather a more distant branch of the sauropodomorph clade. While it is true that Sauropods evolved from smaller, bipedal Dinosaurs, Prosauropods did not proceed the typical sauropods as implied by the video.
IIRC, "Prosauropod" is an outdated term. The more modern term for similar looking bipedal Sauropodomorphs would be "Platiosaurids".
That's the least of the corrections I would made.. almost all of the species are portrayed wrong and outdated
See, I can generally forgive the general cartoonish designs for the sake of presentation. I don't think these were meant to be accurate visually, but I would like to know more if you feel there is more info that this video got wrong.
@@MysticMindAnalysis they could be cartoonish and still accurate.. but this looks like totally lack of research. No feathers? Pronated hands? Dilophosaurus with raptor claws? Seriously? It's too much
Plateosauria!!
@@Anita_Dick I feel ya.
If I had the animating skills I would make accurate dinosaur videos, but I’m fourteen merp, but I am good at art so much might just do my demonstrations in drawing them
This video was my childhood. Watch this every day and this video is the reason I studied prehistoric life. Thank you. You have earned a subscriber
#1 my art teacher
Despacito Rico Mapping wth u doing here
kremit the frog I see u in almost every comment section 🤧🤧
i hate her
Savage af
@@courtneycamoraDKKy. Howie I so with with die
Why does the Dilophosaurus have sickle-shaped claws, since when were they dromaeosaurids?, Why aren't their any protofeathers, this is so Inaccurate, especially with their broken wrists. I thought this was supposed to be an educational channel.
Edit: 1. About the protofeathers thing, I was going on to say, if your gonna make one thing inaccurate why not due to the whole thing completely.
2. There was a guy saying something about going against science, but I what meant to say is that for example, the whole scaly or feathered T-rex debate was not really necessary, although I may be wrong, my point is, I argue for biomechanics, for example, the argument for elephants or whatnot, the reason they don't reassemble mammoths or possess large coats of fur/hair is that it would provide no purpose with the current environment, which they correlate with, also, in addition, there was an article or studies explaining biomechanics in certain animals (disclaimer I maybe over paraphrasing or saying something wrong, so feel free to correct) I think there was a certain size limit to which feathers/hair/fur would no longer be necessary for Sarah/ desert or tropical environments, due to tot eh biomechanics of the animal, which may include certain things like heat circulation, but I am not entirely sure. But I just wanted to clarify my stance, in addition to supporting my claim, "Saurin" the Kickstarter game for a scientifically accurate dinosaur survival game, have researched a conclusion similar to mine, Ben G. Thomas made a video about this, so go check it out: ua-cam.com/video/pG5sbVN3tI8/v-deo.html
no evidence of feathers on dilophosaurus, and is very unlikely and useless
not every theropod has feathers
@@KTruth0 True, but you must consider the possibilitty of that their are different types of feathers such as slight forms of feather like quills.
The Truth useless? Feathers can be used for attracting mates, scaring off potential predators, camouflage, challenging rival males, etc. Just like today birds, its likely a lot of dinosaurs uses feathers for this feature. While not all theropods is coated from head to toe by feathers, all of them have feathers in some form. Just like how elephants, even whales have hairs.
Not necessarily true at all, carnotaurus and other members of it family most likely didn't have feathers, no evidence for spinosaurs having feathers, and extremely early theropods such as eorapter probably didnt have them. Not All Theropods had feathers, its possible for them to have them up there is not direct evidence for it.
@@pablocuin7295 Sometimes you do not need evidence for some certain cases, yes spinosaurids had no feathers because their more like crocodilians and much for reptillian than avian. And Abielasaurids had shortened arms and tough armoured skin and squared heads.
Stegosaurus and Triceratops were still bigger than any land animal alive today
Trollovmetal but not as big as they look in the video especialy Stegosaurus.
Was stegosaurus bigger than an african elefant? I dont think so
Eduardo Freitas yeah it was actually, is an elephant, 30 foot long? Was it 6 Tons? No it wasn’t (Average elephants are 5 tons)
@@MosasaurMosasaur average male is.4.5
Minor corrections, 1, theropods hands faced inward not backwards. 2, dilophosaurus didn’t have a sickle claw as it wasn’t a dromaeosaurid (true raptor). Oh and some theropods such as t-rex had feathers.
Most theropods*
As far as we know, only carnosaurs lacked feathers since they evolved separately from other theropods, but they could have had something similar
@@alanchihak6369 Yes. Oviraptorosaurs, Ornithomimosaurs, Dromaeosaurs, Proceratosaurids and Therizinosaurs had feathers. Theropods such as Megalosaurids and Spinosaurids did not had feathers.
actually there is no evidence that t rex had feathers (other than dromaeosaurids and other small dinosaurs) because all fossil skin imprints of t rex and it fellow relatives (tyranosaurids) did not have feathers and instead scales an in areas like the back so there is no evidence of t rex having feathers . just a friendly fact :)
@DARVIN BAROI dont be a jerk: 1 i dont play roblox anymore i play the isle. 2 i never said t rex definitely did not have feathers because yutyrannus did, im saying that there is not allot of proof
0:40
Since when was dilophosaurus a raptor?
Since it ate Dennis Nedry
What would Steven Bellettini (Your Dinosaurs Are Wrong) say about this?
Yes!! Pitch that!!
@@m.ltheextinctchannel9975 Sup Mario.
Most probably he wouldn't be very happy.
The hand joints are bent wrong!!! The hands where directed inwards not downwards.
"Those dinos just gaved me eye cancer"
The Biggest Dino I Saw Was
*DonaldTrumpWallasaurus*
NANI
No biggest is
Ultrasaurus
lmao
I was the biggest
K :(
Why dilophosaurus has
a sickle claw?!
cuz its communist
they used raptors body in this video lol
It’s not a raptor
@@KangarooFam no shit
@@Greenierw A slavicsaurs
Title:T-Rex was tiny.
T-Rex: come on, I told you not to tell anyone!
Spinosaurus was the REAL king of the dinosaurs!
Patitogon is the most humongous of the dinos
@@CoreyMillionaire2029 in terms of carnivores and their strength Tyrannosaurus is still the king but in terms of sheer size that would be argentinasaurus
There's a hell lot of names of dinosaurs to remember
For a second i thought i was watching the infographics show
XD
Some of these renditions are okay, others are plain awful...
Modern corporate animation style for ya... couldn't be uglier tbh
Actually some Triassic dinosaurs already got pretty big. Melanorosaurus gew to be about 10 meters long, making it one of the biggest land animals of the Triassic, and Herrerasaurus was one of the largest predators (after rauisuchians) at 6 meters long.
I THOUGHT SPINOSAURUS WAS THE LARGEST
@@titanosaurgaming3000 Bo
Siglimassasaurus is the largest Theropod
Amphicoelias is the largest Sauropod
Torosaurus is the largest Ceratopsian
Ankylosaurus is the largest Ankylosaurid and Bone armour dinosaur
Allosaurid -
Epanterias is the largest Allosaurid
Neovenator is the largest Neovenatorid
Giganotosaurus is the largest Carcharodontosaurid
@@kkvnair3201 T. Rex is the largest theropod with a weight (in nature seize is determined by mass not height or length) with upper estimates about 11 tons.
Isn’t argentinosaurus the biggest
Spinosaurus was in the Cretaceous not the Triassic. And it’s thought to have been mainly a fish eater. Also recent evidence suggests that T Rex was 70 percent bigger than originally thought and if this is true it was bigger than Spinosaurus.
1:37 why in the nine realms it's diplo draging it's tail?
1:32 when an education channel puts a Jurassic Park design as their T. rex instead of an up to date one
Wheeze
1:28 *spits drink* PFFFFFFFFFFFF *talks in a grade a under a voice* wtf I thought they were a little smaller then that Jesus Christ man
Funtime_Swagbear Oooh, I know GradeAUnderA!
Funtime_Swagbear z
They actually grew bigger but t.rex was smaller than giganotosaurus and spinosaurus and charcharadontosaurus
_im sorry WHAT!?!? HOW DID YOU GET SO MANY INACCURACIES IN A 2018 VIDEO!?!?_
0:40 so if that dilo is 6meters long that girl is 3meters long
She is talking about LENGTH
Just because other dinosaurs were bigger than Tyrannosaurus rex doesn’t mean it was small
titanosaurus seeing a t rex: danm wtf is that an ant
What the heck? Since when did Dilophosaurus have a sickle claw? And pronated arms? Really?
"t-rex was tiny"
Me: it's tiny but it has powerful teeth •-•, also famous Oml-
A few small corrections
Should not have probated hands for the theropods
T Rex needs at least minimal amounts of feathers (Not just a few quills but rather coverage of part of the body)
Triceratops and Stegosaurus could grow to 9 meters long and why are mentioned by the video to be puny? They weren’t that long but still triceratops and a few other ceratopsians grew over 8 tons in weight! Upper estimates of triceratops weight is 12 tons!
Why does some of the sauropods in the animation look like a modern Charles knight 1920s painting sauropods (Mainly pointed at the apatosaurus) the neck should be at a more horizontal angle, tail lifted better above the ground and less stocky legs. Anatomical proportions are not the best.
Finally, titanosaurus like patagotitan, puertasaurus and argentinosaurus were not 20 meters long they could be over 30 meters long and 20 meters tall. Patagotitan was measured to be 122 feet long so that specimen is easily 37 meters.
Despite this, over all it was a nice video.
@@alanchihak6369 it did not
@@alanchihak6369 Tyrannosaurids and Tyrannosauroids are different, Yutyrannus, Guanlong and Dilong were feathered but they were included in the superfamily... Tyrannosauroidea and were more basal... (That 'o' makes a big difference)
While The the more derived ones like Tarbosaurus, T.rex and Daspletosaurus belong to the family Tyrannosauridae a branch of the superfamily mentioned early and so far there has been no evidence of feathers in Tyrannosauridae... But yeah it's too early to discard the possibility of feathers
Though I agree with Ethan Yao on rest of the points, also the narrator Shud have specified about the Cretaceous period she just lumped Triceratops and Stegosaurus together... They might have been similar in size but Triceratops and T.rex were closer to us in time than they were to Allosaurus and Stegosaurus...
@jon doe do a google search before you try to look smart when your not
@jon doe thats stupid they found evidence some raptor species did
You dont remember the spinossaurus ? He is bigger than trex. Aniway i like the video
Spinosaurus is a very underrated dinosaur unfortunately. I knew what a trex was when I was 4 years old but i found out that what spinosaurus was when I was 19. Spinosaurus is very underrated
In my opinion, spinosaurus is the best largestest carnivore. I think it could beat a trex with its massive sharp claws. Also sarcosucas, Spion could bite into it and use its giant arms and hands to tear it apart
@@carljohnsoncj6896 ohh jp3 fan listen man sure the spinosaurus is cool in jp3 but in real life its a fishy boy and if trex and spino ever meet it would die like die
The trex had 8000 ibs and spino had 4200 bite force a bite from Tyrannosaurus rex would rip of spinosaurus neck...Sorry man......
And spinosaurus lived in africa and trex lived in north america sure both lived in cretaceous but spinosaurus lived in early cretaceous and trex lived in sooner cretaceous so they never meet
Planet Earth spinosaurus had arms the size of elephant legs with claws that could rip apart dinosaurs. Trex arms were just bigger than human arms. Bite force isn’t everything.
Trex weighs around 8,000kg and spinosaurus weighs 15,000kg
It’s larger
Bigger
Has useable claws that are sharp as katana swords.
Great video. Love the Jurassic Park style music.
Does my sister count? She loves foods and is huge!
Never
0:25 “everything changed when fire nation attack”
Why does the dilo have a raised toe?
Because they took a Jurassic Park "Velociraptor", stuck a crest on its head, and called it a day. Also note the pronated hands.
@@pixelfox9666 lol true
I love your videos.... They are so informative and so easy to understand.... Loved it... Keep up the good work 😊😊😊
Adila Sameera
And also innaccurate
Do NOT take them as accurate sources of science
@@lasemanamayor9396 OK
Brontosaurus wasn't a dinosaur, it's apatosaurus.
In 2015, Brontosaurus was classified as it's own species again.
Dilophosaurus did NOT have a sickle claw.
No shit sherlock
can you pls gimme likes dilo doesnt have a sickle claw idiot
The pronated hands of the theropod in this animation is so cringy...
YOU CANNOT MAKE THAT HAPPEN WITHOUT BREAKING BONES!!!
AND THE SICKLE CLAW IN THE DILO
Yup.
Says somebody who is poor on subs
That poor t rex must have broken its wrists and then lost all it's feathers. Shame.
Did anyone else notice how the video stated that brontosaurus is 26 meters, while the argentinosaurus which is supposed to be bigger is 20 meters long, when they're supposed to be bigger? It seems contradictory here... (Note, the correct measurements are that brontosaurus is 21 - 23 meters long while the argentinosaurus is 22 - 33.5 meters long...)
People might underestimate Argentinosaurus at times, but that thing is huge. It could be 35 mtrs in length, maybe some older individual would've reached up to 40! Avg weight is around 75 metric tons, but some say it could've reached 100 metric tons and in terms of height it could've been almost 20 mtrs in height! It's almost 4-5 times taller than an avg T Rex. The 1954 Godzilla was like 50 mtrs in height, this thing is 20, basically 40% the height of Godzilla. This Dinosaur was biggest of the biggest.
T-Rex: I'm the biggest carnivore
Spinosaurus, Giganotosaurus,and carcharodontosaurus: hold our beers
Finally a dinosaur video that has Patagotitan in it.
You just need more accurate reconstruction.
yeah
This is why i love long necked dinosaur they are my favorites
Idk what is the really big long necked
But my fav is brachiosaurus now my new fav is argentinosaurus
Sauroposeidon was the tallest EVER dinosaur argentinosaurus is just the heaviest/largest.
@@feeznaz9100 tallest but not the biggest.
Fun fact : did you know that the brontosaurus wasn't real .
Yes
Fun fact: Brontosaurus was reinstated as its own species again aka it's real.
@@Raikulus to be honest it's not
@@ghosty_bruh It is. There is no "tbh" or not. Unless new papers by paleontologists come out, Brontosaurus will remain as its own genus/species.
btw a quick google search could've easily told you the answer.
@@ghosty_bruh He's right you know
and also y'all people that are complaining about the " art " and the anatomy need to shut your mouths and listen to what it's saying
like seriously calm down it's not supposed to be extremely realistic, and besides, we never will know what the dinosaurs looked like.
i mean we do know what they looked like but alright. also, the shit she’s saying is false as well
The Blue Whale at the end was amazing
Yep
1:25 WTF this is oversized as heck
nah, u just watch JW too much.
@@thelagger3761 jw is actully pretty accurate
@@glonkerdonker132 The dilo from JP-JW is a young dilo we never got to see an adult one
@@azroth9087 ok...
I know that but still very random
There is a living dinosaurs today and they are birds
Birds are a type of dinosaurs
Not really...dinosaurs are kind of ancestors to birds (atleast what I think that is)
@@supergayboy445 exactly, but they are also dinosaurs
@@supergayboy445 Dinosaurs arent ancestors to birds birds did existed during the time of Dinosaurs & every Dinosaurs died 65 million years ago there wasnt any surviving Non Bird Dinosaur
45 kg is pretty small for a sauropod that size.. also, sauropods didn’t hold their necks up like that. They would need an extremely powerful heart for that. And it would take a lot more than 45 kg for energy to hold that neck up.
Oh and I do want to mention one thing. The brachiosaurids would have likely held their necks somewhat vertically (something referred to as an S-curved pose), due to having their forelimbs longer than their hind limbs and a few other reasons, and yes they would have had very powerful hearts, estimated at 400 kg in weight, and needing double the blood pressure of a giraffe to reach the brain. Where the video went wrong it’s with its depiction of Brontosaurus. Brontosaurus did not have a vertical neck, it would have been quite more horizontal.
This channel is really use full , me as medical student really enjoying in ur vedio
For us dinosaur nerds,this video was trash (well at least the models).
Why could argentinosaurus measure 20M long,isn't it 35 to 50 m long and 21 M tall
I remember being fascinated with Dinosaurs when I was 7 and thinking what bollocks religion was...
Also back then the oxygen content was much higher so the more oxygen the larger things could get
Wow must have been a hot planet facilitating giant cold blooded reptiles
Dinosaurs weren't ectothermic, we've known this for decades.
My children says I`m a dinosaur so i bought a computer to figure out what they ment :-:)
While you may be disliking due to the inaccuracies, I’m still astounded that sauropods had air sacs and pneumatized bones like the raptors.
Obviously how else will they hold up those huge necks high above the ground
2:46 every ark players dream tame
But the rage meter and titan has more health and damage
Mine is dodorex
Mine is brontosaurus
@sami nouh level 10? I tamed 46
Yup, also Rex and spino, and I don't want a giga because it does its rage ability and it's risky
1:15 *THOSE ARE TRICERATOPS*
You watch RickRaptor105 I take it?
Brontosaurus is actully called apatosaurus
It was discovered in 2015 the vertebra don't match meaning it's not a apatosuars.also there is 3 now.
02:26 Brachiosaurus ate just 45 kgs?
Even an elephant eats more than 250 kgs per day.
This is great but they aren’t called Brontosaurus
They are called Apatosaurus
Gosh I’m such a Dino nerd
not really considering it's brontosaurus again cause it was changed back in 2015 to brontosaurus.
Yeah such a dino nerd you didnt point out that litteraly everything in this shitty video is false
Not alone
no, you’re more incorrect than he was. brontosaurus is part of the diplodocid family whereas brachiosaurus is a macronian (i think that’s what it is). And yes brontosaurus is its own genus now
Brontosaurus isnt real it is just a young apatosaurus
5 train 🚈 🚞 It wasn’t, then it was like back in 2017 or something. Looks it up, I’m not completely sure on the details.
People have a lot of imagination for making uo facts lol
CoolGuyWithAHat01, I think it was more 2015.
quit spreading lies
@DARVIN BAROI *NO!*
0:41 Velocidrome anyone? From Monster Hunter
It does look kinda like one!
I know right
Haha, the good old boss, where all started...
Hahaha
The biggest dinosaur I watched as a toddler and kid was Barney. I regret nothing haha. I loved the big friendly dino and had my own barney doll
Can you imagine how big the heart of these creatures should be??
Scientific inaccuracy at it's finest
45 kg a day well a cow does around 60 kg explain me that.
I think they meen per bite
Meen???
@@danibalic576 she doenst say so i think its half research
I kept my youtube running on for an hour and this was it ended up at started from pewdipie
Fff
why did you put the sauropods neck up? that is scientifically impossible
I didn't know only prehistoric animal geniuses were welcome in the comments I just came here to say what my favorite dinosaur is
*It's the Brachiosaurus by the way*
I'm sorry but.. the thumbnail gave me a wrong idea.. heh..
What?
the word T.Rex is nowhere close to the word dick
No the bigest is 40m
The girl us black but has white voice
*ain't being racist here boi*
"white voice" ? wtf ? is this a thing ? you mean she doesn't have a black accent from the south or something ?
Is everything needs to be politicize
People can sound like anything..
jay fawn yes because it's what society do and ima do it to
ledernierutopiste yes
You know the Dilophosaurus in your video is just a raptor with crest's added on
Patagotitan was bigger then argentinosaurs it height was 124ft
Unsubscribed. There are so many inaccuracies with this video, you've lost all credibility. Do better/deeper research and start again.
What about the Barosaurus, or the Sauroposeidon?
Ye the barosaurus was almost double the side of some of the biggest Dinos ever
Nice info of dinosaur well done
I love how everyone in this comment section is suddenly an expert on dinosaurs lol. Not doubting that the video's wrong, I believe y'all, but it's kind of funny.
I think I speak for most people when I say that it's annoying when every dinosaur video has a comparison to Tyrannosaurus, even if it's not even remotely related.
I love this video.
as you all wondering brontosaurus is not a real dinosaur. its actually apatosaurus
SERIOUSLY?? Why not 40?! 2:53
I do not think at all that Steven Brusatte would approve of these inaccuracies! Prosauropods arent direct ancestors of sauropods, I beleive they are now called Plateosaurids and things like them gave rise to the immense sauropods!
0:41 it's missing the frill on its neck
Alex B is this a joke or nah?
@@justawildgengar yeah it's a joke :) basicly it's weird to see the dilo without the frill after watching jurassic park
Alex B yeah when I think of a dilo I think of it with a small acid spitting frill dinosaur but it was pretty big and didn’t have any drill sadly
@@justawildgengar yeah :) also I feel bad for Nedry when it killed it, cause Nedey didnt do anything on purpose, hammond yelled at him for no reason and that's why he stole the DNA
Alex B yeah it was pretty sad and he didn’t even get a quick death like the guy that got eaten by the T.Rex he got sprayed in the eyes by a dilo
Pretty good video, nice and easy to understand. Too bad the 13 year olds think nitpicking shows their intelligence.
Argentinosaurs is 40 meters long
Y’all really forgot the ankylosaurus
Ankylosaurids and nodosaurids:*angry herbivore sounds*
Argentinosaurus: we are the biggest
Blue whale: hold my beer
I believe argentinosaurus was larger than the blue whale but I might be wrong
@@th3radlad_727 your wrong
@@11dheads74 k
the biggest creature that ever walked the earth was argentinosaurus , he could get 25/35m long and weigh about 50/100 tons
Argentinosaurus* And patagotitan might have been bigger.
The correct video