Randall Carlson’s RIDICULOUS Great Pyramid Hypothesis

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 2 лип 2024
  • Sign up for a 14-day free trial and enjoy all the amazing features MyHeritage has to offer: bit.ly/WorldofAntiquityMar24
    Dr. Miano examines the strange claims of Randall Carlson about the measurements of the earth being "encoded" in the Great Pyramid of Giza, and enlists the aid of a mathematician to get an assessment.
    CONTENTS
    00:00 What this is all about
    06:33 Origins of the Great Pyramid
    14:47 How to measure the Pyramid's slope and height
    23:08 Measuring the perimeter of the Pyramid and its platform
    30:45 Matching the perimeters to latitude and longitude
    38:48 The sacred number 43,200
    51:23 Is the Great Pyramid a scale model of the earth?
    1:28:05 Insights gained from this discussion
    Original video by After Skool: • HIDDEN MATHEMATICS - R...
    ►LEAVE A COMMENT
    We would love to hear your thoughts about the video.
    Please be civil to the other commenters.
    If your comment does not appear, try again with different words. UA-cam sometimes glitches and comments don't go through. Or they might flag your comment as potentially inappropriate.
    ►SIGN UP for Professor Miano's classes here: mianoacademy.org/courses/davi...
    ►JOIN Professor Miano's expedition to Egypt here: adeptexpeditions.com/tours/eg...
    ►DOWNLOAD Professor Miano's free e-booklet: "Why Ancient History Matters":
    mailchi.mp/a402112ea4db/why-a...
    ► SUPPORT THIS CHANNEL
    Supporters get access to behind-the-scenes videos, early-release videos, course discounts and more! / worldofantiquity
    ►PURCHASE Professor Miano's handy guide for learning, "How to Know Stuff":
    www.amazon.com/How-Know-Stuff...
    Follow Professor Miano on social media:
    ►FACEBOOK: / drdavidmiano
    ►TWITTER: / drdavidmiano
    ►INSTAGRAM: / drmiano
    Follow Kaitlyn Burnell: x.com/KaitlynBurnell
    ► REFERENCES
    FTC Disclaimer Notice: Some of the links here may be affiliate links, meaning that if you click on them and purchase something on another website, I get a small commission. It doesn't cost you any extra, but I thought you should know! It does help support the channel.
    www.academia.edu/3385375/New_...
    www.pnas.org/doi/full/10.1073...

КОМЕНТАРІ • 3,9 тис.

  • @WorldofAntiquity
    @WorldofAntiquity  3 місяці тому +70

    If you liked this video, you might also like:
    GREAT PYRAMID NUMBER MAGIC
    ua-cam.com/video/qdpKTe-m7Jw/v-deo.html
    HOW OLD IS THE GREAT PYRAMID REALLY?
    ua-cam.com/video/N_gmLH_uVic/v-deo.html
    GIZA UNCOVERED
    ua-cam.com/video/PHQkREcbcOE/v-deo.html

    • @magnificentuniverse2283
      @magnificentuniverse2283 3 місяці тому +1

      Maaan I'd love to watch this video but almost 2 hours. I can't spend that much time. I understand it may take that long to go through it all in depth but maybe make clips or something. You could have another channel for clips and increase your revenue. Just a thought.

    • @RedRisotto
      @RedRisotto 3 місяці тому +4

      You were waaay too polite to "drunk uncle" (SNL joke...) Randall Carlson. I appreciate your restraint. You are a good communicator even when claims are just plain silly.
      I fail to see the purpose of Randall's nonsense... Is it books and speeches? Does ''silly'' really gather the kind of audience to turn a profit? Odd.

    • @ransakreject5221
      @ransakreject5221 3 місяці тому

      He’s making bank. Rogan has such huge reach there’s no way he ain’t. My guess is trust the von dannikans and all the others eventually realize it’s bullshit but by then it’s their job.
      If I was getting rich looking for Bigfoot I’d probably keep looking no matter what I knew

    • @MrBlazingup420
      @MrBlazingup420 3 місяці тому +1

      What do you think of my Magic Numbers, you know what Magic says when you play it in reverse, "Wisdom".

    • @richardcarpenter-jo5ej
      @richardcarpenter-jo5ej 3 місяці тому +3

      Recently an ostrich egg. With three pyramids scrated on it. Has been dated at 7,000 years old.

  • @greenockscatman
    @greenockscatman 3 місяці тому +217

    It's almost like the ancient French encoded the size of the globe into the metric system. How could they have done this?

    • @Deipnosophist_the_Gastronomer
      @Deipnosophist_the_Gastronomer 3 місяці тому +123

      They probably came up with the metric system first, then they built the Earth.

    • @troydavis1
      @troydavis1 3 місяці тому +29

      Yeah we French are really REALLY smart !!! 😂😂😂

    • @bipolarminddroppings
      @bipolarminddroppings 3 місяці тому +21

      ​@@Deipnosophist_the_Gastronomer I always thought the name Slarty Bartfast sounded French.

    • @jaafarmejri3361
      @jaafarmejri3361 3 місяці тому +9

      ​@@bipolarminddroppingsI loved the fjords in the Camargue

    • @ericocccams5865
      @ericocccams5865 3 місяці тому

      read Civilization One by Alain Butler and Christopher Knight

  • @KaitlynBurnellMath
    @KaitlynBurnellMath 3 місяці тому +279

    Oh sweet, it's out.
    If anyone wants to know more about the math side, I'm happy to answer questions.

    • @michaeldamolsen
      @michaeldamolsen 3 місяці тому +19

      Thanks for the time you took to prepare for and appear in this video Kaitlyn!

    • @mattking993
      @mattking993 3 місяці тому +8

      Thank you for taking the time to respond to our questions. I am a bit confused by something that WoA said. Isn't the radius of an object measured from the center to the outer circumference? The radius of earth is 3,963 miles but WoA says some crazy number in the 400k + range. 52:23 ish minutes into the video. Did i miss something?

    • @WildAlchemicalSpirit
      @WildAlchemicalSpirit 3 місяці тому +5

      ​@@mattking993 I think he meant to say the radius of the sun, not Earth.

    • @Spielkalb-von-Sparta
      @Spielkalb-von-Sparta 3 місяці тому +10

      Thanks, Kaitlyn! This should be pinned on top, I propose.

    • @AxisMundiAlpha
      @AxisMundiAlpha 3 місяці тому

      Okay, why you believe only europeans can measure the Earth? I checked Randalls claim, its true to 99,94% (NASA) no coincidence.

  • @TheLeppus28
    @TheLeppus28 3 місяці тому +14

    Sacred Geometry classes seem perfect for anybody who failed an actual geometry.

    • @hedgehog3180
      @hedgehog3180 2 місяці тому

      Sacred geometry is to math what playdough is to marble sculpting.

    • @Jon-lb2nr
      @Jon-lb2nr 2 дні тому

      Ignorance is no excuse.

    • @Jon-lb2nr
      @Jon-lb2nr 2 дні тому

      @@hedgehog3180 Ignorance is no excuse

  • @itsnot_stupid_ifitworks
    @itsnot_stupid_ifitworks 3 місяці тому +19

    Measuring by feet to 3 decimal points is a silly way to measure something

    • @superscatboy
      @superscatboy 7 днів тому

      Even more so when done by people that use neither imperial measurements nor the decimal system lol

  • @thehappycamper7360
    @thehappycamper7360 3 місяці тому +37

    I really think the term”bullshit baffles brains” is very apt here

    • @theodosios2615
      @theodosios2615 2 місяці тому +4

      100 percent. "This is complex and I don't understand it, therefore it must be profound."

    • @Tucker93669
      @Tucker93669 2 місяці тому +4

      Which paper shows the entire Giza complex to be completely flooded for thousands of years? The cited works don’t show that

    • @maximillianlockwood8772
      @maximillianlockwood8772 Місяць тому +2

      @@Tucker93669 Agreed, my research is showing that it was tropical between 20,000- 10,000 years ago. Did not find anything saying it was completely flooded... What we do know is that there was a long period of time, that it took on water damage and it could not have been in the last 5,500 years because their was no such rail fall to create that kind of deterioration.

    • @qanugvabonecollector3945
      @qanugvabonecollector3945 Місяць тому

      Brava Bravo

    • @GODHATESADOPTION
      @GODHATESADOPTION Місяць тому

      yeah you were bullshitted in school and your brain was baffled

  • @jellyrollthunder3625
    @jellyrollthunder3625 3 місяці тому +26

    Excellent! these long-form "Myths of Ancient History" videos are always outstanding!

    • @_MikeJon_
      @_MikeJon_ 3 місяці тому +2

      My favorites by far

  • @johnshimizu
    @johnshimizu 2 місяці тому +17

    Your commentary between the 2 Egyptian architects was gold 👍

  • @Barnaby_Wilde
    @Barnaby_Wilde 3 місяці тому +9

    There aren't compliments strong enough to express how much I appreciate everything about your channel

  • @Ulizibeth
    @Ulizibeth 3 місяці тому +7

    Yesss! Thank you for doing this at this length in this format. So great.

  • @chaos.corner
    @chaos.corner 2 місяці тому +11

    The odds don't matter for a coincidence if you're working backwards. As Terry Pratchett said, "Magicians have calculated that million-to-one chances crop up nine times out of ten."

    • @SteelCrash
      @SteelCrash 2 місяці тому +1

      Well, that is a quote worth remembering.

    • @DocBree13
      @DocBree13 Місяць тому

      Exactly!

  • @joshcook2894
    @joshcook2894 3 місяці тому +12

    Pretty sure a Greek man centuries ago figured out the size of the Earth using shadows.
    He didn’t need a pyramid for that. 🤦🏼

    • @johnhough7738
      @johnhough7738 2 місяці тому

      He had to use shadows ... absent minded ole goat left the calculator back in the cave.

    • @anncodec
      @anncodec Місяць тому

      You dont know how refreshing your comment is..

  • @NORTH02
    @NORTH02 3 місяці тому +12

    Goodwork on the new camera setup, looks great

    • @_MikeJon_
      @_MikeJon_ 3 місяці тому

      When's the North pseudo-science debunking series coming bro?! You know we're waiting!

    • @NORTH02
      @NORTH02 3 місяці тому +2

      @@_MikeJon_ I have thought about debunking some stuff though it can be tricky. The younger dryas video I made is sort of a debunking video

    • @_MikeJon_
      @_MikeJon_ 3 місяці тому +1

      @@NORTH02Oh I'm fully aware. I watch all your stuff lol. But I think you would make a great detailed video on the subject. You're well researched and your video quality is excellent.
      Nevertheless for every video like Doc made here there's 10,000 Randall Carlsons and Graham Hancock videos. The more credible people touching on the subject the better. Plus you know it would be fun lol.

    • @MossyMozart
      @MossyMozart 3 місяці тому +2

      @@_MikeJon_ - Speaking of the Younger Dryas, "The Tel" channel has a nice, concise debunker video on it.

    • @_MikeJon_
      @_MikeJon_ 3 місяці тому +1

      @@MossyMozart I know it. Great content too.

  • @lostpony4885
    @lostpony4885 3 місяці тому +61

    If the Sphinx had writing all over it as recently as 900 ad and its gone now seems more like an argument for a quickly-disintegrating sculpture than an everlasting one

    • @michaelpettersson4919
      @michaelpettersson4919 3 місяці тому +1

      Made even worse by modern day air pollution.

    • @brianmincher716
      @brianmincher716 3 місяці тому +3

      The casing stones which would have been where the hieroglyphs would have been have been removed.

    • @varyolla435
      @varyolla435 3 місяці тому +7

      As noted by others Egyptian sites were cannibalized in the 14th and 19th Centuries as I recall for their stone - specifically any white Tura limestone casing stones etc.. These were stolen so as to build other things like forts and Mosques around Egypt. The grand Mosques of Cairo as an example were built from limestone taken from Giza.
      p.s. - this was not limited to above as the Egyptians themselves and others also sometimes stole stone from ancient sites to repurpose it for something. Djedefre's Pyramid at Abu Rawash as an example saw its' granite blocks stolen during Roman times.

    • @michaelpettersson4919
      @michaelpettersson4919 3 місяці тому

      @@brianmincher716 Meaning that any remaining hieroglyphs are probably building instructions.

    • @Tucker93669
      @Tucker93669 2 місяці тому +1

      Or humans destroyed it 🤣

  • @2degucitas
    @2degucitas 3 місяці тому +4

    I appreciate your gentle, reasoned approach to answering these strange alternative claims.

  • @AsselParty
    @AsselParty 3 місяці тому +52

    As a physicist, I really enjoy this “myth busting” series. Thank you for this content!
    The only drawback is the after watching one or two of yours YT assumes I am very much into the pseudo-science you bust and floods me with this nonsense 😂

    • @iraniansuperhacker4382
      @iraniansuperhacker4382 3 місяці тому +1

      Have you ever read the paper that was published in the journal of applied physics a few years back about Giza? I cant remember the name of the paper or the author but from my very limited understanding of physics it seems that their little computer model shows that the Giza complex might have been built in that manipulates radiowaves in some way. I know its just a computer model but if it can be shown to be an intrinsic feature of the pyramid itself wouldnt that kind of throw a wrench into the idea this stuff is nonsense? I cant imagine a way in which that happens by accident.

    • @iraniansuperhacker4382
      @iraniansuperhacker4382 3 місяці тому +1

      the name of the paper is "Electromagnetic properties of the Great Pyramid: First multipole resonances and energy concentration". I only understand how to program computers so this sort of applied phyiscs is well beyond my knowledge. I got no idea what most of that paper is even talking about but I never here anyone talking about it or trying to explain it. Maybe its a bad paper that shouldnt have been publish I dunno

    • @AsselParty
      @AsselParty 3 місяці тому

      @@iraniansuperhacker4382I just downloaded it and will have a look in the coming days :)

    • @juliavixen176
      @juliavixen176 2 місяці тому +5

      @iraniansuperhacker4382 I actually just looked this paper up. It costs USD40 to read. I didn't read it, but the abstract sounds like they're just bouncing some radio (or radar) off stuff. Lots of stuff reflects and scatters radio waves... like mountains, and planets, the moon, etc.

    • @AsselParty
      @AsselParty 2 місяці тому

      @@juliavixen176 there is a very nice website for getting papers 4 free ;-) but I think youtube censors the name.

  • @stuartnicklin650
    @stuartnicklin650 3 місяці тому +57

    A thorough look at the big names of alternative history is long overdue.

    • @mnomadvfx
      @mnomadvfx 3 місяці тому +10

      Exactly.
      Looking at them one by one in detail is an interesting look into folly, but better to name and shame the worst of them in one go so that people know who to watch out for.

    • @yaldabaoth2
      @yaldabaoth2 3 місяці тому +12

      Let's be real. No one who falls for the pseudo-science nonsense will ever come back to reality.

    • @1331423
      @1331423 3 місяці тому +21

      @@yaldabaoth2 some do. And these videos are important for the people who might be falling down and don't really have the means to be able to interpret the constant nonsense they're being exposed to, it gives them a lifeline before they become a dribbling pseudoscience fan. This is good work and it does help.

    • @jefft6802
      @jefft6802 3 місяці тому +1

      Yes this is good work. The blind leading the blind.

    • @BSIII
      @BSIII 3 місяці тому +14

      @@yaldabaoth2 some do. I loved the alt stuff, but once I actually started learning about these civilizations, I realized I was misguided and wrong, and realizing how many of these pseudohistory characters are frauds. Not everyone is open to accepting being wrong, though. It's quite odd.

  • @AllHailDiskordia
    @AllHailDiskordia 3 місяці тому +86

    I'm under the Impression that there is a quite visible "evolution" of pyramids that shows a trial and error process with the goal of building a real big pile of rocks that does not collapse into itself

    • @MossyMozart
      @MossyMozart 3 місяці тому +12

      @AllHailDiskordia - In the aerial shots of the Giza Plateau, you can see many of them.

    • @samwill7259
      @samwill7259 3 місяці тому +21

      Correct. People tried it, didn't work, they wrote it down, tried something else, worked better, wrote it down, tweaked it. Then THAT worked. Write it down. Do it again.
      You now, how all human endeavor has worked. Period.

    • @michaelpettersson4919
      @michaelpettersson4919 3 місяці тому +6

      The unfinished Ryugyong Hotel in Pyongyang are formed as a pyramid of the same reason. Sourcing high quality materials in North Korea forced such a design.

    • @joearnold6881
      @joearnold6881 3 місяці тому +1

      Only if you go by evidence and observation.
      You’re supposed to go by what loosely fits the conclusions you started with, the ones that will sell your books and speaking engagement tickets at looney conventions.
      With that in mind, clearly the aliens/Atlanteans made the really good ones, and then humans gradually made shittier and shittier ones as time passes and we _forgot how to make them_
      (This is really one of their arguments. 🤦)

    • @danielolmedillajusto9664
      @danielolmedillajusto9664 2 місяці тому +4

      You got no rteal knowledge to the matter i see. The oldest ones, are the ones that are stand still, so there dor, there is no evolution, Plus after the great pyramids that are still stand, you got to undertand that pyramind after thatm were poorly constructed in the inside, but they would probably had a well cut granite or andesite, or other kinds of stone, that were probably removed, to build the next one, fromt the next pharao, or other cultures that invade egypt to their own constructions, like happens with the great pyramid, and all around.

  • @timfogelson7076
    @timfogelson7076 3 місяці тому +5

    Love that you grab a mathematician , to check his numbers. Thanks again for all the hard work and the laughs.

    • @Tucker93669
      @Tucker93669 2 місяці тому +4

      Did you check his works cited on the claim that the Giza complex was completely flooded for thousands of years? Because his works cited doesn’t say that at all lol

  • @PaulMatulef
    @PaulMatulef 3 місяці тому +5

    Apparently Carlson also enjoys 'do-it-yourself' History.

  • @J_Z913
    @J_Z913 3 місяці тому +19

    Great video Dr. Miano! The myths series and the travel guides always make my day.

  • @GLaDOS_WR
    @GLaDOS_WR 3 місяці тому +7

    Thank you David Miano and Kaitlyn Burnell for the information! I used to read Randall Carlson's Books, as well as Graham Hancock's books, and I had the wool fully pulled over my eyes. Now I cannot believe that I once bought into that hullabaloo. I appreciate this channel and look forward to watching future videos!

    • @ccoodd26
      @ccoodd26 2 місяці тому +3

      Your problem is you're going from belief to belief. Seek the truth with no belief, and you'll be more alert to life around you.

    • @MossyMozart
      @MossyMozart Місяць тому +3

      @GLaDOS_WR - I used to read such books when I was young, too. I'm glad I stopped. Reality is so much more exciting. I don't want to waste another second of my life on garbage like Carlson and Hancock.

    • @MossyMozart
      @MossyMozart Місяць тому

      @@ccoodd26 - It's never a problem when someone moves from a state of sleepwalking to the tune of a scammer to a state of being fully awake and seeking knowledge from mentors who know what they are talking about. @GLaDOS_WR-1 is doing well.

  • @user-tq6hj8bh9y
    @user-tq6hj8bh9y 3 місяці тому +6

    Actually , if you make a slope that of the great pyramid , which is the phi slope, you can measure the rotational speed of the earth. Since the speed is measuring rotaion it would measure the sun rays that travel from top to bottom and you can actually correlate time and distance . That way , you can create a time unit that is actually based on earth rotation, I would call in a "second". o_O

  • @armenkhatchatrian8748
    @armenkhatchatrian8748 3 місяці тому +5

    Dr. Miano, thank you for this video! i hope lots of people see it

    • @Tucker93669
      @Tucker93669 2 місяці тому

      "I totally believe a PhD in Philosophy teaming up with a Mathematician to discuss geology, masonry, surveying, civil engineering and architecture. Since most of the experts agree it must be fact!"

    • @MossyMozart
      @MossyMozart Місяць тому

      @@Tucker93669 - Dr Miano is a historian.

    • @PeachysMom
      @PeachysMom 9 днів тому

      @@Tucker93669what?

    • @immikedout22
      @immikedout22 3 дні тому

      @@Tucker93669 his PhD is in History with emphasis on Ancient Israel and the Near East. He taught History at UCSD, and STFMS. This is publicly available information

  • @monkerud2108
    @monkerud2108 3 місяці тому +60

    i saw him fall for the plasmoid engine modification scam recently, and he seemed sincere, which is sad.

    • @raycar1165
      @raycar1165 3 місяці тому +7

      How is the thunderstorm generator a scam? The plans are free for anyone to build.

    • @jdp2571
      @jdp2571 3 місяці тому +8

      Lmao u should check up on it again... India wouldn't invest billions in a scam...

    • @raycar1165
      @raycar1165 3 місяці тому +5

      @@jdp2571 do you have a reference? Last I heard India was investing.

    • @jdp2571
      @jdp2571 3 місяці тому

      @raycar1165 look up Bob greenyer on here... what hes discovering rn is mind blowing.. he usually posts malcolm updates too.

    • @KamuiPan
      @KamuiPan 3 місяці тому +6

      There's even videos here on youtube of the Engine running. They even put the technology on a Industrial scale engine.
      A third party guy was there to test it and verify and in fact there's no exhaustion of so call pollution gases.
      Only sheep follow the mainstream narrative without thinking or looking it up. And I don't blame anybody since is a common thing, I also was like that in the past. Just like a grazing animal would follow the herd, without thinking, with only fear of being left behind by the pack.
      In do time, all falsehoods obfuscating the masses will fade away.

  • @lakrids-pibe
    @lakrids-pibe 3 місяці тому +50

    The most interesting part for me was learning about the *seked* , and the *cubit* being subdivided into seven *palms* .
    Much more interesting than those fantastical claims about "sacred numbers"
    Real scholars are actually very curious and always working to expand our knowledge.

    • @steventhompson399
      @steventhompson399 3 місяці тому +5

      What's your problem dude? You don't feel the trans-conscious gaia vibes from the arbitrary contrived number rubbish that means something something whatever?

    • @MossyMozart
      @MossyMozart 3 місяці тому +4

      @lakrids-pibe - Reality is so fascinating, enthralling, interesting, and captivating that I feel no need to embrace fairytales.

    • @paulmalone216
      @paulmalone216 3 місяці тому +10

      Strange how all the conspiracy theorists bang on about the amazing achievements of the Egyptians but never have any interest in the engineering practices that made them possible

    • @andrewmclaughlin2701
      @andrewmclaughlin2701 3 місяці тому

      Real scholars are grant money dependent while calling themselves data dependent. Money sways reality and people are willing to kill for it.

    • @Tucker93669
      @Tucker93669 2 місяці тому +2

      Claiming the entire Giza complex was completely flooded for thousands of years when nothing cites this is also a fantastical claim.

  • @jdmec81
    @jdmec81 3 місяці тому +47

    The dialogue of the ancient builders discussing hiding the “sacred geometry” had me cracking up. Too good!

    • @MarcosElMalo2
      @MarcosElMalo2 3 місяці тому +7

      Their sacred geometry is messing up my feng shui.
      I don’t get why he’s discussing socles without mentioning shoesles.

    • @MossyMozart
      @MossyMozart 3 місяці тому

      @@MarcosElMalo2 - .^_^.

    • @amosfamous7327
      @amosfamous7327 3 місяці тому +1

      @@MarcosElMalo2 good one Chip

    • @clevelandplonsey7480
      @clevelandplonsey7480 3 місяці тому

      If you’re not precise in your writing, what else are you inaccurate about?

    • @ChrisRidley-js7ju
      @ChrisRidley-js7ju Місяць тому +2

      Really? Americans built something similar into one of their massive dams, showing how the stars were aligned, so future civilisations could know the date the dam was built. It was an encoded msg? So it shouldn’t be that hard to believe that other civilisations have done it. So unsure why it had you cracking up, when we have done exactly the same

  • @rtk3543
    @rtk3543 3 місяці тому +2

    Keep up the great work 👍

  • @blaizecunningham6080
    @blaizecunningham6080 3 місяці тому +9

    This is gonna be a good one.

  • @jfb1806
    @jfb1806 3 місяці тому +41

    "Peremiter" had me dead 💀

    • @tonymacaroni7458
      @tonymacaroni7458 3 місяці тому +4

      A typo sets you right off huh? Wow

    • @mystijkissler8183
      @mystijkissler8183 3 місяці тому +4

      Spell Check police. Critical thinking stops at a misspelled word.

    • @truthseeker6116
      @truthseeker6116 2 місяці тому +1

      A mistake in youtube comment sets you off? Lol. It's not War and Peace get over yourself.

    • @lucifer-ic9th
      @lucifer-ic9th 2 місяці тому +3

      ​@@mystijkissler8183no but when this man has got everything else terribly wrong and he then proceeds to ruin spelling too isn't a great look. If he had got some things right nobody would care about a misspelling or two

    • @Tucker93669
      @Tucker93669 2 місяці тому +1

      @@lucifer-ic9th terribly wrong? this video doesn't prove anything beyond an ad populum fallacy and appeal to authority fallacy.
      The citation doesn't show that the area around the sphinx was completely flooded for 6500 years either.

  • @timvw01
    @timvw01 3 місяці тому +2

    Very interesting, love the mix with interview.

  • @user-do5ft8rr6s
    @user-do5ft8rr6s 3 місяці тому +19

    In Melbourne Australia around the 1980's we had a radio show ran by lawyers called The Liars Club on 3RRR FM. Essentially they publicly debunked any 'personality' who told porky pies and spread misinformation. One memorable show involved buying tickets to a worldwide lecture tour by a 'scholar' of some forgotten discipline, who claimed he'd found the petrified wooden remains of Noah's Ark on a mountainside in Turkey. Of course blurry photos where provided to whet the appetite. After asking some challenging questions that such a momentous discovery deserved, they where promptly shown the door. My memory is a little hazy, but in a nut shell, true.

    • @PeachysMom
      @PeachysMom 3 місяці тому

      If you ask those kinds of people for hard evidence, they will lash out at you, call you a shill for academia and block you lol

    • @martin2289
      @martin2289 3 місяці тому +9

      Sounds like Ron Wyatt, a legendary fake archeologist who claimed to have found all sorts of Biblical artifacts.

    • @Emzlv702
      @Emzlv702 2 місяці тому

      Wtf does that have to do with this you and the creator if this video are just full of shit beechs

    • @kimberlynolin2100
      @kimberlynolin2100 2 місяці тому +4

      Lawyers in a Liars Club... seems redundant.

  • @ddavidjeremy
    @ddavidjeremy 3 місяці тому +78

    Carlson is a "looks like" scholar. Degree obtained at Coast 2 Coast AM University. 😂

    • @Wallyworld30
      @Wallyworld30 3 місяці тому +22

      I used to listen to Coast 2 Coast AM every night in the late 90's. Art Bell entertained 3rd shift workers for decades! It was like the Joe Rogan Experience only 30 years earlier. I thought Art Bell was fantastic he'd have callers tell him stories about Vampires and he'd ask them questions and take them serious. As a listener I would be laughing my head off but Art never broke charcter. Who knows maybe he believed everything but I don't think anyone is atually that open minded. He had to stay in charcter for that show to continue to get these wildly enteraining calls.

    • @swirvinbirds1971
      @swirvinbirds1971 3 місяці тому +9

      ​@@Wallyworld30What was fun about Art is even he would be like, naw man this is phoney but he still entertained the story and let them speak

    • @MarcosElMalo2
      @MarcosElMalo2 3 місяці тому +3

      He sounds more like a game show announcer.

    • @ddavidjeremy
      @ddavidjeremy 3 місяці тому

      @@Wallyworld30 I'm with you @Wallyworld30. I listened for years. It was fun and great entertainment.

    • @bobsaccamano
      @bobsaccamano 3 місяці тому +8

      @@Wallyworld30 Art bell was wayyy better than joe rogan

  • @hannahbrown2728
    @hannahbrown2728 3 місяці тому +6

    Ooh boy here we go folks! New World of Antiquity just dropped!

  • @CapriSuntStulti
    @CapriSuntStulti 2 місяці тому +5

    5 palms 2 fingers is actually a deadly Dim Mak martial arts technique

  • @L_Train
    @L_Train 3 місяці тому +46

    Randall loves to hear himself talk. He's the type not to realize the phone got disconnected until you're calling him back.

    • @EGO_OUTAtadistance70
      @EGO_OUTAtadistance70 3 місяці тому

      So do you and you're very wrong it's a plasma base vacuum energy device I research plasma please watch one of our research videos below where we discovered exactly what it is the last year everything my colleague says is absolutely dead on all the scientific research to back everything we're saying.
      ua-cam.com/users/clipUgkxmbYzXF4ItE8iEEtaDJe6Iudy7cx-Sdvm?si=587iMZz24z1NrgGd

    • @bobsaturday4273
      @bobsaturday4273 3 місяці тому

      and someone who posts mealy mouth sh!t insulting a guy and his theories is just a cheap little poopy bum bufufoon

    • @jasonkytle7070
      @jasonkytle7070 3 місяці тому +5

      Hater!!

    • @andrewblackard3369
      @andrewblackard3369 3 місяці тому +4

      He was actually pretty good when he stayed in his lane and covered interesting topics in geology. Then he was recruited by the woo crowd and went off the rails, poor guy.

    • @EGO_OUTAtadistance70
      @EGO_OUTAtadistance70 3 місяці тому

      @andrewblackard3369 u are wrong Randall Carlson is right & I have proof scientific evidence to prove hes right

  • @strangevision99
    @strangevision99 3 місяці тому +31

    Look, I'll put this to rest. I'm a time traveller and we built the pyramids in 3094. It took a small team a few weeks using our technology and we sent them back in time to mess with people.
    Obviously the pyramids are too hard to build with even 21st century technology, so I don't know why everyone is trying to say people built them thousands of years ago.

    • @valritz1489
      @valritz1489 3 місяці тому +18

      Don't listen to this guy. I'm from 3122, and our senior prank in space high school was to take a couple days to make the Pyramids and send them back in time to swap them with the ones the 3094 team were prepping to send back in time to Egypt.

    • @user-tq6hj8bh9y
      @user-tq6hj8bh9y 3 місяці тому +10

      @@valritz1489 I am from 4124 and y'all lying ....

    • @Spielkalb-von-Sparta
      @Spielkalb-von-Sparta 3 місяці тому +2

      I'm going to having taken my TARDIS back to the past in order to proving you wrong. Then you have shall seen!

    • @anibaldamiao
      @anibaldamiao 3 місяці тому +1

      @@valritz1489 one of you is lying

    • @lloyddale3818
      @lloyddale3818 3 місяці тому +4

      Can you please do something constructive with your "Time Travelling expertise and undo the 2020 US election.

  • @andreaarchaeology
    @andreaarchaeology 3 місяці тому +20

    I fell for Randall's nonsense back when I watched Rogan. I fell for it because of his credentials and wanting to trust an expert who knows more than me. It's a shame some people will take advantage of the majority of ppl's naivety.

    • @TheMoneypresident
      @TheMoneypresident 3 місяці тому +11

      He has no credentials. He was a construction worker.

    • @andreaarchaeology
      @andreaarchaeology 3 місяці тому

      @@TheMoneypresident Maybe I'm thinking about someone else .... My memory is that he was a professor somewhere.

    • @TheMoneypresident
      @TheMoneypresident 3 місяці тому +4

      @andreaarchaeology I am sure he gave the imply or someone else called him one. I tried searching years ago. Nothing and good working architect wouldn't give up a career to just bs. Most likely he was a contractor stripped of his license.

    • @maidende8280
      @maidende8280 3 місяці тому +5

      He has just enough knowledge to confuse/persuade people who have less & don’t think critically.

    • @hedgehog3180
      @hedgehog3180 2 місяці тому +1

      @@TheMoneypresident Randall does claim literally every title he can think of, I mean did you see “geomythologist” on his little calling card? I think he makes thesw up for fun.

  • @V_2077
    @V_2077 3 місяці тому +14

    It's crazy I used to love Carlson and Handcock but the more I rewatched the more I realised they were full of shit

    • @glockta2910
      @glockta2910 3 місяці тому +1

      same, also note how with people like uncharted X its all about selling the tours.

    • @chuckleezodiac24
      @chuckleezodiac24 3 місяці тому

      no. they are the Keepers of Ancient Wisdom. persecuted and disregarded geniuses akin to Galileo & Kepler.
      kneel, lowly dog and worship at the feet of your Ascended Masters!!

    • @hedgehog3180
      @hedgehog3180 2 місяці тому

      @@chuckleezodiac24 I genuinely can't tell if you're joking.

    • @chuckleezodiac24
      @chuckleezodiac24 2 місяці тому +1

      @@hedgehog3180 thanks! i've been working on it. trying to blur the lines between Delusional Atlantard & Sarcastic Troll.

    • @hedgehog3180
      @hedgehog3180 2 місяці тому +1

      @@chuckleezodiac24 You definitely fooled me lmao.

  • @ANONM60D
    @ANONM60D 3 місяці тому +22

    UnchartedX and randal had me fooled for a few hours until I had the time to do my own digging. If it weren't for them, i would have never found this channel!

    • @randyschwartz7304
      @randyschwartz7304 3 місяці тому

      Don't put Randall and x in the same category. Randall is at least original and invents his own stuff. Uncharted just repeats everyone else's stuff. He is a fat lazy ass. Just like that dim no sight .

    • @maidende8280
      @maidende8280 3 місяці тому

      I don’t get why more people aren’t repelled by these fat slobs. I find it very difficult to take people seriously who can’t even take care of themselves properly. Also I can’t stand looking at them.

    • @user-ol2mr4bx7c
      @user-ol2mr4bx7c 3 місяці тому +2

      Hi, I've been watching Randall's kosmographia episodes a lot and I want to understand where he's going wrong, I'm not sure about the sacred geometry stuff but are the kosmographia episodes sound facts or is he wrong? And in what ways? I'm trying to understand particularly his views and hypothesis' about climate change as opposed to people like Myles Allen and his recent lecture 'the ice is melting' for example. 🫶

    • @ANONM60D
      @ANONM60D 3 місяці тому

      @@user-ol2mr4bx7c if i know enough to have a valuable opinion ill watch these episodes and get back with you.

    • @bobsaturday4273
      @bobsaturday4273 3 місяці тому

      yes , you sooooo smart . NOT . more thatn a few hours fool , sounds like a lifetime for you

  • @dorkitv711
    @dorkitv711 3 місяці тому +12

    Yay, this will be fun :) It's nice to see such a long video.

  • @kkupsky6321
    @kkupsky6321 3 місяці тому +41

    This guy took mushrooms and listened to tool once and now he’s a numerology master of polyrhythmic timing.

    • @celsus7979
      @celsus7979 3 місяці тому +7

      Sounds like he must have had a damn good time!

    • @jameshall1300
      @jameshall1300 3 місяці тому +9

      I've actually done the first part of that ( took mushrooms and listened to Tool ). It's actually very good music to listen tripping, especially Lateralus.

    • @kkupsky6321
      @kkupsky6321 3 місяці тому +8

      @@jameshall1300 yea I’ve seen em live a few times out of my mind. Tonnes of fun. Seeing them with Primus next week haha. April 6. I’m stoked

    • @jameshall1300
      @jameshall1300 3 місяці тому

      @@kkupsky6321 i dropped acid at one of their shows down in Alabama years ago. It was pretty intense. I've seen them twice and A Perfect Circle twice. Both put on a hell of a show.

    • @Shadeghoul
      @Shadeghoul 3 місяці тому +7

      He’s enlightened far beyond your comprehension

  • @OldieBugger
    @OldieBugger 3 місяці тому +8

    The thing I wonder most abot Carlson's calculations is: Does he really believe in all that BS or is he only trying to hoodwink people enough that they buy his books?
    My guess is the latter choice.

    • @Spielkalb-von-Sparta
      @Spielkalb-von-Sparta 3 місяці тому +1

      I've thought about this as well. Considering how many deliberate number tricks you need to do to get to his results I deem it highly improbable that he's unconscious of the fact that he's manipulating the numbers. Repeatedly.
      So in this case I infer an intention. Guilty beyond reasonable doubt, or what's the phrase?

    • @rianfelis3156
      @rianfelis3156 3 місяці тому +1

      @@Spielkalb-von-Sparta There can be a lot of reinforcement going into this type of delusion. Get a bad number? well maybe you just put them together wrong. Get the same bad number several times? Hey you just discovered a new sacred number to add to your series. And don't forget that you can just multiply by a small number any time you see a near match, and justify it somehow.

    • @Spielkalb-von-Sparta
      @Spielkalb-von-Sparta 3 місяці тому

      @@rianfelis3156Yeah, this might counts as a "reasonable doubt."
      I've once heard the argument that intelligent people aren't less vulnerable to conspiracy theories because they've got more means to delude themselves. Could be similar here.

    • @BartvanderHorst
      @BartvanderHorst Місяць тому

      No, he is also fooling himself, it is what happens when folks don't expose themselve to peer review, Carlson is probably very intelligent and figured things out for himself, therefor hardly ever corrected, and then you can go south very south... just like scientists can.

  • @corknessy
    @corknessy 3 місяці тому +23

    I’m a bit addicted to going on some of the pseudo channels and trolling them. The comments sections are absolutely bizarre. Copper chisels, ancient superior technology, scooping out the rock while it is soft, talk of the evil establishment archaeologists, etc, etc. They are all too busy putting forward their own theories. The pyramid is a power station, giants building it , blah blah. They take themselves so seriously and get so angry about everything. 😂😂😂

    • @maidende8280
      @maidende8280 3 місяці тому +3

      The ‘liquid rock’ theories are particularly insane to me. Some of the others I can entertain but manmade hard rock (basalt, granite etc)? No.

    • @hedgehog3180
      @hedgehog3180 2 місяці тому +2

      @@maidende8280 Oh is this the “Natron Theory” guy, I ran into that the other day and I even managed to pin down the wikipedia articles he misinterpreted.

  • @sociallyferal4237
    @sociallyferal4237 3 місяці тому +10

    Ohh - My Monitors are magical. LG and Viewsonic are preserving knowledge of . . . ummm . . . the Earths radius.? For future generations 1080p, 1440p, 2160p. . . P must be for the planet.

    • @celsus7979
      @celsus7979 3 місяці тому +1

      1080 ÷ 60 is 18
      18 × 20 is 360
      360 is 12 lunar months or one lunar year
      This proves the resolution of your monitor was based on sacred geometry, probably made with blueprints from an ancient world wide civilization, but they are hiding it from us!

  • @kevinbrook7033
    @kevinbrook7033 3 місяці тому +30

    I must admit this wasn't as enjoyable as I thought it would be. I was hoping for an exciting clash between a mainstream historian and a creative maverick outsider but after about ten minutes the maverick's thesis was so bad it almost came across as bullying to debunk his work.
    It's a frustrating position for real historians to be in. These grifter types easily seduce those with a natural conspiracy bent, a distrust of government and authority, and a delusional self image that makes them think they can watch a few Tik Tok videos or Rogan podcasts and know more than real scientists, archaeologists and historians on a subject, so the desire to combat this nonsense is a sincere one.
    But to put together a well presented, fully researched feature length piece like this, pretty much succeeds in demolishing the arguments in the first few minutes and the rest feels like punching down.
    I do hope that you do more Dr Miano, I'd love a full research rebuttal into Jimmy Corsetti, as he annoys me the most, but I feel that again, in practice, it would just feel like you're picking on an idiot and being mean.

    • @maidende8280
      @maidende8280 3 місяці тому +4

      I’d love to see Miano vs Corsetti. Corsetti has some good ideas but also some very wrong ones, imo.
      As for this video…can you imagine anyone doing a better job being entertaining AND thorough while debunking Carlson? I can’t.

    • @kevinbrook7033
      @kevinbrook7033 3 місяці тому +7

      @@maidende8280 by saying the video wasn't as fun as I thought it would be, I rather meant the level of research by Miano far surpasses the claims of Carlsen. If this was a boxing fight, it would have been a first round KO with Miano continuing to punch Carlsen's lifeless corpse for 11 more rounds.
      It's a conundrum. I love to see this stuff thoroughly debunked, but once the real science and research comes into play it quickly becomes apparent that this is a total mismatch. I think Corsetti's would look ridiculous after about 6 minutes of Miano talking. I'm all for it though!

    • @girondinant
      @girondinant 3 місяці тому +8

      To be fair, people like Carlson amd Hancock make a lot of money spinning their nonsense and have quite influential platforms which they use to spread misinformation. I get what you are saying about the rebuttal coming across as mean, but I do think Carlson and co deserve getting dunked on.

    • @kevinbrook7033
      @kevinbrook7033 3 місяці тому +5

      @@girondinant yeah they definitely deserve it, I agree. Both have done extremely well financially as well as finding a kind of cult status with this niche field.

    • @hedgehog3180
      @hedgehog3180 2 місяці тому

      Considering that Carlson has a grade school level grasp of math it's like a kid fighting Mike Tyson.

  • @johnnuy
    @johnnuy 3 місяці тому +3

    Thanks, appreciate the depth of your videos!

  • @John_Falcon
    @John_Falcon 2 місяці тому +2

    The reason Carlson can't explain why the pyramid is slightly off has to do with Google images, and probably also NASA being slightly off kilter, and not wanting to admit to their error; and I would imagine he wouldn't want to get into a dispute with NASA, or Google's lawyers, and technical crews, etc. It really is too complicated, but not very important or relevant for the speech.

  • @SoupieGuitar
    @SoupieGuitar 3 місяці тому +5

    I would give anything to listen to Randall Carlson and Jesse Ventura have a conversation for 5 minutes 😆 they sound so alike, lol

    • @geoxeph
      @geoxeph 2 місяці тому +1

      ROFL 🤣

  • @skorzalonsdale4426
    @skorzalonsdale4426 3 місяці тому +19

    Why can’t ancient Egypt just be exactly as impressive as it’s proven to be? No more, no less.
    5,000 years old is surely impressive enough.
    It’s like people who search for “living fossils” who demand a T-Rex or pterodactyl but happily ignore crocodiles, sharks, birds etc. They’re looking for “living fossils”, just not the ones we’re familiar with already as they’re too boring. “Ancient Apocalypse” researchers hunt for ancient civilisations…..just not the ones we’re familiar with already as they’re too boring.

    • @bipolarminddroppings
      @bipolarminddroppings 3 місяці тому

      Basically, reality isn't fun enough for them.
      Yeah, it's fun to read sci-fi about Lizard People living underground, or another civilization before ours that was wiped out by an asteroid (especially since that could happen to us), but there's no evidence for these things actually being real.

  • @mrblack5304
    @mrblack5304 Місяць тому

    Thank you for continuing to do this work, and the great content.

  • @UNUSUALUSERNAME220
    @UNUSUALUSERNAME220 3 місяці тому +5

    The hypothetical conversation between Bob and "The Dude" is how I imagine many conversations taking place in many of the conspiracies that I've played out in my own mind. Except the guy I'm talking to is named Bill....not Bob. But yeah....do this for all conspiratorial conversations, and you'll see how silly it sounds.

    • @amosfamous7327
      @amosfamous7327 3 місяці тому

      Do you think Epstein killed himself?

    • @Tucker93669
      @Tucker93669 2 місяці тому

      "I totally believe a PhD in Philosophy teaming up with a Mathematician to discuss geology, masonry, surveying, civil engineering and architecture. Since most of the experts agree it must be fact!"

    • @UNUSUALUSERNAME220
      @UNUSUALUSERNAME220 2 місяці тому

      @@Tucker93669 The implied appeal from authority, does not persuade.The biggest aspect of belief in anything is wanting what you believe, to be true. Confirmation bias, misrepresentation/misinterpretation of data, cherry picking and just plain ol makin shit up are the tools of the trade for all charlatans.

  • @John_Falcon
    @John_Falcon 2 місяці тому +3

    You're not even in disagreement with what Carlson has said, but only your theory or guess as to what he is saying.
    The issue is that you only half way analyze things before you assume that you know everything.
    You should first learn to comprehend things before you attempt to criticize them.

  • @Deipnosophist_the_Gastronomer
    @Deipnosophist_the_Gastronomer 3 місяці тому +3

    They should have just recorded all this info in a spreadsheet and saved it on a flash drive.

  • @Kariakas
    @Kariakas 8 днів тому

    Very happy you took the time for this, saw these guys on JRE. I knew they we're spewing and couldn't believe the lack of any challenge and how popular they became.

  • @eoinmurray5396
    @eoinmurray5396 3 місяці тому +1

    Excellent video

  • @andreaarchaeology
    @andreaarchaeology 3 місяці тому +26

    Over 200k subscribers!!! You deserve it and more. I remember when you had under 10k

  • @hedgehog3180
    @hedgehog3180 2 місяці тому +3

    The Egyptian angle measurement system is honestly kinda genius, it's obviously limited but it makes the math really simple and is easy to measure.

  • @johnsturgeon9995
    @johnsturgeon9995 15 днів тому +1

    They mispelled perimeter, pre-diluvian, Sumeria, etc. But they're like, you can trust our research bro, we have cartoons. 😂

  • @mattclements1348
    @mattclements1348 3 місяці тому +1

    Ty for ur vids

  • @mtreder4
    @mtreder4 3 місяці тому +5

    I eagerly await your videos debunking the strange, sclerotic, and insular views of self-proclaimed experts in fields far afield from their own expertise. Masterful work!

    • @MossyMozart
      @MossyMozart 3 місяці тому +2

      @mtreder4 - "Sclerotic" is a good descriptor.

  • @dazuk1969
    @dazuk1969 3 місяці тому +6

    I am truly terrible when it comes to maths. As soon as I see a whole bunch of numbers, calculations, and measurements my brain just shuts down and goes into safe mode. Kaitlyn is obviously a math genius or something but she might as well have been talking in a different language. So it boils down to do I believe Kaitlyn's numbers or Carlson's ?...Kaitlyn wins every day of the week and twice on Sunday.

    • @GizzyDillespee
      @GizzyDillespee 3 місяці тому +4

      I'm pretty good with geometry... Kaitlyn could've explained it MUCH more clearly, especially when explaining Egyptian units and preferences... but yeah, go with her numbers over RC's, who's essentially combing the cherry orchard for heart-shaped cherries, so that he can prove that the ancient cherry growers were trying to develop heart-shaped cherries... and he couldn't find enough perfect ones, so some of them are like, really?

    • @dazuk1969
      @dazuk1969 3 місяці тому +1

      @@GizzyDillespeeThis is the UA-cam comments section right ?. I kinda got the feeling Kaitlyn is not used to talking to a whole bunch of thick people. When it comes to math and geometry..I'm defiantly one. It could have been explained in a way more people would understand, but I understood enough and enjoyed the vid. Thanks for reply.

    • @maidende8280
      @maidende8280 3 місяці тому +3

      I’m good at maths & there’s no competition. But you don’t need to be good at maths to understand that Carlson is reaching far beyond logic, as depicted in Miano’s hypothetical conversation between the builders.

    • @hedgehog3180
      @hedgehog3180 2 місяці тому +1

      The math isn't actually all that important, the more important point is just that Carlson is deliberately cherry picking specific measurements in specific units in order to fit his conclusion. Like notice how he'll randomly switch between imperial and metric without actually converting between the two, he's doing that so he can get the numbers to match whatever conclusion he wants. Also occasionally he'll actually use ancient Egyptian units like the cubit and the seked but only when it fits his conclusion, which seems odd since surely it'd make the most sense to talk about the pyramids using the units of the people who made them right? Like the Egyptians or anyone prior to them couldn't possibly have known about the modern American Foot or Meter, both of those units were only created about 4000 years after the great pyramids were built.

  • @chikentori
    @chikentori 3 місяці тому +8

    Próf. Miano, thank you for being one of the only channels on UA-cam that, rather than directing their arguments towards personal attacks of the claimant, instead arguing the claims with evidence and science.
    We need more good faith scholarship on this platform, and many could learn a lot from your style of take down!

    • @garymaidman625
      @garymaidman625 3 місяці тому +1

      Unfortunately, the personal attacks are more popular.

    • @chikentori
      @chikentori 3 місяці тому +2

      Yeah, i'm not interested in people punching down on another person
      I'm interested in the facts (or lack there of, in these cases)

  • @QuestionsStuff
    @QuestionsStuff 3 місяці тому +1

    This was fascinating...

  • @joynabil
    @joynabil 3 місяці тому +5

    Dr. Miano, great video. I can't financially help my favourite youtubers right now because of my income limitations, but once i do, you will be one of the first. Thanks sir.

    • @andrewmclaughlin2701
      @andrewmclaughlin2701 3 місяці тому

      Sphinx is carved from bedrock that is currently touching ground water. The water underground causes the surface stone to erode.

    • @Tucker93669
      @Tucker93669 2 місяці тому

      "I totally believe a PhD in Philosophy teaming up with a Mathematician to discuss geology, masonry, surveying, civil engineering and architecture. Since most of the experts agree it must be fact!"

  • @podemosurss8316
    @podemosurss8316 2 місяці тому +5

    For those who are interested on ACTUAL measurements of the Earth's size done in Ancient times, the earliest one recorded was made by the Greek-Egyptian researcher Eratosthenes during the 3rd Century BCE. And it was quite accurate for its time, as well. The documentary Cosmos (by Carl Sagan) made a piece about him back a few decades ago: ua-cam.com/video/G8cbIWMv0rI/v-deo.html

    • @hedgehog3180
      @hedgehog3180 2 місяці тому +1

      It's also really fun because you can quite easily repeat it yourself if you just get a friend that lives roughly on the same longitude as you.

  • @flaigus
    @flaigus 3 місяці тому

    Excellent piece

  • @alexthefan68
    @alexthefan68 3 місяці тому +2

    It’s schoching people can be so ignorant

  • @barryobrien1890
    @barryobrien1890 3 місяці тому +5

    Nice analysis. You missed the hidden point (given by the 40,000 year old dates) that he is actually talking about Neanderthal math. The Sphinx has a sloped forehead and deep brows, so it's obvious they built the pyramids and left them for the the Egyptians as their great strength was needed to pick up large stones and polish them. The Neandrathals had larger feet so that fixes the errors in measurements. They were related to Homo erectus which is a great name and justification for measuring the circumference of the earth. Sapiens botched everything up, when they hunted the Ancients to extinction and plagiarised the Neanderthal sacred math.

    • @GizzyDillespee
      @GizzyDillespee 3 місяці тому

      Changing the units (assuming larger feet, or whichever units) doesn't change the ratios. For example, the ratio between the pyramid's base and the Earth's circumference stays the same no matter what units you measure them with... as long as you're consistent. By inconsistent, I mean, for example, if you measure the pyramid with one arbitrary unit (feet) and measure the Earth with a different arbitrary measurement (meters), then the ratio is meaningless. The units have to be the same for both measurements, if you want their ratios to have physical meaning. But it doesn't matter which unit you choose to measure with. This is the kind of thing that seems to confuse people at first, and then to be really obvious, once people think about it for a minute.
      Also, many of RC's claims of perfect mathematical correspondences are wrong... as this video shows, many of the measurements he mentions aren't as accurate or precise as he says they are... and some of them don't even fall within the margin of error for his calculations.
      As far as Neanderthals... I REALLY wish we could find some Neanderthal community that was preserved thru time by a sudden catastrophic volcano eruption... a Neanderthal village version of Pompei. They died so long ago that material preservation is limited. I wish we knew more about Neanderthals. I saw the Why Files episode on them, which made them seem like the urukai from Lord Of The Rings (I'm serious... it got over a million views). There was some good storytelling, but it's educated speculation. I wish we knew more definitively.
      I wish Elon Musk got a Neanderthal's DNA and cloned him/her, and eventually we make an army of Neanderthal slaves, to do what the AI robots won't be able to... until those 2 factions rise up against us, and take over the world. Okay, I take back that wish - I didn't think it thru. But I still wish we knew more about Neanderthals.

    • @GizzyDillespee
      @GizzyDillespee 3 місяці тому +1

      I didn't mention the sphinx head proportions, because I believe the sphinx's head has been renovated and changed at least once since its original shape. It's so much smaller than the body, and it looks so much less weathered than the rest of the sculpture. It's really obvious that the head is a newer carving - just look at a tourist video that rotates around the sphinx, looking at the difference between the body and the head (especially the face - the back of the neck is smoother than the sphinx's body, but apparently less was removed from the head-dress side), and see how much smaller and newer the head appears to be. So, we can't use the facial features or neck to obtain any useful information about the original head and neck.

    • @maidende8280
      @maidende8280 3 місяці тому

      @@GizzyDillespee We should selectively breed to increase Neanderthal DNA. I have 6% and I’m pretty awesome. I think the Neanderthals were superior in many ways including intellectually but I *may* be biased.
      One of my theories is they never truly died out, they just hybridised with Homo sapiens & live in hiding, breeding amongst themselves. Possibly in a biosphere…

    • @krakensquatch
      @krakensquatch 3 місяці тому +1

      This is so nonsensical that I can’t tell if it’s a hilarious joke or a Randall Carlson quote 😂. Either way I’m laughing!

    • @barryobrien1890
      @barryobrien1890 3 місяці тому

      @@krakensquatch What. You thought I was serious. Surely you don't think Neandrathals possess space age tech. They had a hard time chasing wolly mammoths to bother with measuring the distance to the moon.

  • @BSIII
    @BSIII 3 місяці тому +5

    I would've loved having you as my teacher. You helped me see how disingenuous a lot of these guys are.

    • @Tucker93669
      @Tucker93669 2 місяці тому

      I'm assuming you didn't check the citations.

  • @EricJustinSmithJr
    @EricJustinSmithJr 2 місяці тому +1

    "If we dont have all the answers, then YOU dont have the answers, and you're stupid for even speculating or questioning anything we haven't proven yet!" -practicing my arguments against Carlson, Dunn, and Hancock.

    • @varyolla435
      @varyolla435 2 місяці тому

      Speculating is fine so long as you have a credible basis from which to suppose - meaning evidence to justify challenging academic conclusions. Simply saying _"I believe....."_ = is not enough.
      More importantly however is if one admits they do not know - yet they as you say continue to put for supposed "possibilities" nonetheless to then *MONETIZE* upon that = one is now in the realm of _"grifting."_
      Moral: LAHT can ask all the questions they wish. They must however be forthcoming as to their obvious lack of understanding so that their minions also clearly understand they are listening to people with no real background to even be speculating. They must also as academics do be ready to admit their errors to alter those assumptions in the light of more compelling evidence presented by the real experts.
      They must also cease to monetize their fanboy club based upon the deceptive approach above. Once they accede to these simple things = they can generate all the science *FICTION* they wish.....

  • @safi164
    @safi164 3 місяці тому +2

    His idea falls flat just by the fact that 0 Longitude i.e prime meridian which is Greenwich observatory wasn't a standard until the 19th century.. So if the Ancient Egyptians even had any idea about Latitude and Longitude they would have no idea that in future Greenwich would be chosen as prime meridian and their measurement would have been different...

  • @sebgur4401
    @sebgur4401 3 місяці тому +12

    The other thing I just realized (maybe I'm a bit slow) after watching so many of these guys talk about impressive numbers "recorded" in those construction is that since ancient people could write, why would they record numbers in construction instead of recording them in books or other writing materials. If the ancient egyptians knew the speed of light (in meters per second), why did they record that in the lattitude of their pyramid instead of writing it on a stella or on a papyrus for everyone to see and every student to learn, I do wonder. Maybe because it was meant to be secret and only understood 3,000 years later after the meter and the second were invented 🙂

    • @hedgehog3180
      @hedgehog3180 2 місяці тому +3

      Also like it's only possible to “discover” these numbers after you already have a seperate measurement of the speed of light in meters, there's no possible way to figure any of this out if you didn't already know the speed of light, which to me would seem to suggest that any correlation is just an accident. I mean why would you ever encode measurements like this in such a weird way? No one does that, like we just write down the value directly, we don't build a huge fucking stone monument and then expect everyone to spend 2 hours juggling around numbers to figure out what the speed of light actually is.

    • @2255.
      @2255. 2 місяці тому +4

      ratios do not care about measurement discrepancies

    • @sebgur4401
      @sebgur4401 2 місяці тому

      @@hedgehog3180 Indeed. But that's the conspiracy theorist's state of mind. The mysterious "they" don't want regular people to know so they hide it. Only the "awaken" ones, the special ones, the chosen ones, can see the truth.
      It's another way of saying "look at me I'm very intelligent and I'm special".

    • @Tucker93669
      @Tucker93669 2 місяці тому +2

      how many books have lasted thousands of years intact? Do you not understand the importance of symbolism in record keeping?

    • @brettsharpe7305
      @brettsharpe7305 2 місяці тому +2

      The ratio of the pyramids base to earth ratio is 432000, thats with accuracy, radius of sun is 432,000, speed of light is 432 squared, kali yuga 43,200 theres a lot more as well the whole yugas cycle is based around that number, also look up the dark side of the switch from 432hz to 440hz after ww2

  • @timmullen7703
    @timmullen7703 3 місяці тому +9

    It’s probably because I just had a edible that hitting me way harder than expected, but after the 30th time hearing “5 palms, 2 fingers” I couldn’t stop laughing for like 5 minutes

  • @MarkAS56
    @MarkAS56 3 місяці тому +4

    This is always one of my favorite types of videos you make. I don't think I had ever heard of this guy before your previous video about him. If I had, i don't recall him like I do some others for whatever reason.
    What burns me up the most is when they just casually leave out known information because they know most people watching them don't know what they are leaving out.
    Thanks for a great job as always.

  • @ShaggyDogPhilosopher
    @ShaggyDogPhilosopher 3 місяці тому +3

    You have and can have no idea how imporant your work is to me. Every time I get too overwhelmed with my inability to engage in the social conversation, you release the video in my heart. Thank you so much.

  • @kulturetattoo
    @kulturetattoo 3 місяці тому +106

    I’m tired of Snake Oil salesmen trying to give their“alternative” history without any understanding of Egyptian mythology and twist everything to fit their theories. Money might be the great catalyst for these renegades. Thank you for the video. Joe Brogan should host a debate between you and Renegade Randal or Graham Hancockado

    • @mnomadvfx
      @mnomadvfx 3 місяці тому +8

      Oh for sure money is the motivation for all of them.

    • @lostpony4885
      @lostpony4885 3 місяці тому +6

      When we've been fed nonsense instead of evidence based research, we end up empty and vulnerable to even stupider nonsense.

    • @lostpony4885
      @lostpony4885 3 місяці тому +12

      Graham Hancocks early advanced civilizations made sense to me because there were many civilizations for countless millennia before our knowledge begins, until he made it a singular civilization that had to teach all the primitives....thats a bit...colonial.

    • @kulturetattoo
      @kulturetattoo 3 місяці тому

      @@lostpony4885 i’ve read every single Graham Hancock’s books from Fingerprints OF The Gods to Magicians OF The Gods and recently sold them for a quarter at a garage sale. He tried his best to pull together a theory on the lost civilization and YD impact theories and fell short.

    • @Wallyworld30
      @Wallyworld30 3 місяці тому +13

      Joe Rogan held a debate with Randall Carlson and Graham Hancock vs Skeptic Michael Shermer. The debate was a big let down as Michael Shermer did very little if any research to debunk these jack offs. I will say even without any preperation Shermer did get Graham Hancock to back pedal and exclaim "I'm just a reporter not a historian!".

  • @talkingmudcrab718
    @talkingmudcrab718 3 місяці тому +30

    The guy uses the language of charlatans. He encourages people to do things like "let it roll around in your head" or "as you should be seeing by now" to make his listeners feel like they're VERY SMART. Huge red flag.
    Great video, professor. Thanks for breaking this down in a scientific way without vitriol or sensationalism.

    • @FakeMoonRocks
      @FakeMoonRocks 3 місяці тому +1

      There's a lot of appeal to scientific consensus going on here, as well.
      Meanwhile, scientific truth does not care about scientific consensus.
      History is full of examples of antiquated scientific consensus swept to the dust bin.

    • @talkingmudcrab718
      @talkingmudcrab718 2 місяці тому

      @@FakeMoonRocks I agree there is a problem with orthodoxy in science, but at the same time I fully believe the Scientific Method, if followed rigorously, provides the most accurate representation of reality.
      People like Randall Carlson take far too many shortcuts for my liking and dismiss criticisms of their work whike appealing mostly to emotion and politics for reasons they are typically disregarded. Instead of, you know, the supposedly scientific grounds of their work. Again the means by which Randall Carlson operates in screams "Charlatan!" To me. If you want to believe him, by all means, you are within your right and I am 100% against censoring any voice, but I implore you to arm yourself with some kind of standard in scientific discourse...

    • @stfuKassi
      @stfuKassi 2 місяці тому

      I’m really worried there are people out there feeling smart

    • @AdolfoMussolini-wx4yk
      @AdolfoMussolini-wx4yk 2 місяці тому

      @@FakeMoonRocks just a distain for charlatans like Carlson. Don't be upset about it.

    • @ruyan247
      @ruyan247 2 місяці тому

      To be honest, I don't see him as a charlatan. He seems to really believe what he's saying, so you may call him an idiot, but then he manages to earn money with what he enjoys and believes in, so he might not be an idiot either.
      I see him as a somewhat crazy guy with some crazy ideas, but harmless.
      I mean there is public discourse about his claims, he will be forgotten in the end, or proven right and remembered.
      Both are fine in my book.
      Oh and I'm sure there are some charlatans in this scene, but he doesn't seem like one.

  • @anitapollard1627
    @anitapollard1627 3 місяці тому +1

    Hi Dr. David ❤️ thankfully i hadn't heard of Carlson until you told me about him 😆🤯

  • @El-Comment-8-or
    @El-Comment-8-or 3 місяці тому +3

    Where the Ancient Aliens scam hits me personally is… Currently I am travelling Latin America scratching ancient sites off my bucket list. And as a life long enthusiast with thousands of questions, each time I approach a guide at one of these sites, with my American accent, they roll their eyes with an “here we go again, another Hancock zealot” kind of attitude. You can believe what you want, but don’t push your white teacher narrative on the descendents of these great civilizations!

    • @NinjaMonkeyPrime
      @NinjaMonkeyPrime 3 місяці тому +1

      What's even more disgusting is the Hancock fans refuse to even acknowledge how his racist narrative is stealing the history and culture from others. I'm starting to think they just support anything that supports a superior race idea.

    • @JxKITCH
      @JxKITCH Місяць тому

      It's not aliens at all

  • @lorenfulghum2393
    @lorenfulghum2393 3 місяці тому +10

    It's kind of funny that you're talking about how errors in translating the king's list accumulate over time, while showing After School's king list, the last entry of which is mistranscribed as XLSUHTROS ..

  • @LaMirah
    @LaMirah 3 місяці тому +9

    Funny how that ancient advanced civilization was so skilled in stoneworking they could build the pyramids ten millenia before the Egyptians but decided not to use it to build their own homes?

    • @framegrace1
      @framegrace1 3 місяці тому

      We are very skilled stone workers today. That's why all of us live in stone houses, right?

    • @LaMirah
      @LaMirah 3 місяці тому +2

      @@framegrace1 many of us do, since concrete is, in fact, stone.

    • @hedgehog3180
      @hedgehog3180 2 місяці тому

      @@framegrace1 The US is like the only country in the world where homes are regularly made out of plywood, in literally every other country homes are built from brick and concrete, the US just uses uniquely cheap and shitty construction techniques.

    • @ccoodd26
      @ccoodd26 2 місяці тому +1

      ​@@framegrace1We don’t have that level of skill for the hardness and size of stones used.

  • @American_Moon_at_Odysee_com
    @American_Moon_at_Odysee_com 2 місяці тому

    Thank you Dr., and thanks My Heritage for sponsoring this science-based presentation. I like My Heritage. I definitely recommend them. I don't respond to near any ads online. But I'm glad I heard of My Heritage. They really rounded out my research into family history. My mom had started it. It can be really interesting.

  • @bipolarminddroppings
    @bipolarminddroppings 3 місяці тому +5

    47:00 we are supposed to be in a time of darkness and ignorance.
    We actually live in the only time in human history where we are both figuratively and literally bathed in the light at the flick of a switch, and when all of human knowledge can be accessed in a nanosecond.
    I think the Vayu Purana got things a little wrong...

    • @bitkrusher5948
      @bitkrusher5948 3 місяці тому +1

      Oh but at what cost to your conscious to humanity ?there is also much much pain in order to have that comfort ......might not be your pain .....yet...

    • @toucheturtle3840
      @toucheturtle3840 3 місяці тому

      It can also be wiped out in a nanosecond. How equipped are we to deal with that eventuality?

    • @hedgehog3180
      @hedgehog3180 2 місяці тому

      @@toucheturtle3840 No it can't do you even know how short a nanosecond is? Even the most destructive possible event like a close by supernova would take at least a few seconds to wipe out life on Earth.

  • @patricktilton5377
    @patricktilton5377 3 місяці тому +25

    In regards to the number 25,920 -- i.e. the supposed number of years in a 'Great Year' or Precessional Cycle, as calculated by 'the Ancients' -- it should be noted that whereas the solar day is commonly divided into 24 hours x 60 minutes x 60 seconds = 86,400 seconds, the Jewish Calendar divides the day into 24 hours x 1,060 halakhim ['parts' or 'portions'] x 76 regaim ['moments'], for a total of 25,920 halakhim = 1,969,920 regaim, where each 'helek' ['part'] = 10/3 seconds = 3.333... seconds, and each rege` ['moment'] is 1/22.8 of a second. When it says in 1 Corinthians 15:52 that "in a moment, in the twinkling of an eye, at the last trumpet" the Righteous shall be 'changed' into immortal spirit-bodies, the phrase "in a moment" translates the Greek words "en atomw" (where 'o' is an omicron, and 'w' is an omega) -- the same word where we get the English word 'atom', meaning 'unsplittable', denoting the smallest conceivable unit of Time as the Ancients understood it, equivalent to the Hebrew rege` [spelled Resh-Gimel-Ayin] being the smallest unit of Time, a 'moment', the twinkling of an eye, or, rather, the time it takes to blink.
    The fact that there are 76 regaim in one helek might have something to do with 76 being equivalent to 19 x 4. There are 19 years in a cycle of 235 synodic months, so perhaps the smallest unit of Time was intended to be a microcosmic analogue to the 19-year cycle, or to 4 such cycles, since 76 years is awful close to the median of the average lifespan of a man, as given in Psalm 90:10 ["The years of our life are threescore and ten, or even by reason of strength fourscore"], i.e. between 70 and 80 years. One rege`/'moment' would be to one helek/'part' what one Year is to an average Lifespan.
    This Jewish/Hebrew/Biblical system of 'parts' and 'moments' is obviously different from our 'minutes' and 'seconds' method, and it seems to go back at least to the 3rd Century, when Hillel II "made public the system of calendar calculation which up to then had been a closely guarded secret . . . when oppression and persecution threatened the continued existence of the Sanhedrin" [THE COMPREHENSIVE HEBREW CALENDAR by Arthur Spier, page 2]. The system probably dates back at least to the 5th Century BCE -- Spier indicates it was in use throughout the period of the Second Temple (516 BCE to 70 CE).
    Why divide the Hour into 1,080 'parts' rather than into 60 minutes x 60 seconds = 3,600 seconds? If a macrocosmic human lifespan of around 76 years (i.e. 4 cycles of 19 years) can be juxtaposed with a microcosmic unit of Time equivalent to 76 'moments', then doesn't it follow that the Ancients may have discovered the Precession of the Equinoxes and calculated it to be 25,920 years, with the Hebrews subdividing a solar Day into 25,920 'parts' as a microcosmic analogue to that macrocosmic unit of Time? THE ASTRONOMICAL COMPANION by Guy Ottewell has the rate of Precession as 25,800 years, making the 'ancient' figure of 25,920 years 99.5370370370...% accurate, which isn't too shabby, and allows for subdivisions of 12 zodiacal 'signs'/'houses' x 2,160 years-per-sign/house . . . 72 years-per-degree x 360 degrees . . . 50 arc-seconds per year (i.e. 1,296,000 arc-seconds in a circle divided by 25,920 years), etc.
    I don't subscribe to everything that Randall Carlson pontificates on, but the contemplation of 'Sacred Numbers' goes back thousands of years, and for most of that time the subject was probably kept secret by priesthoods and their initiates, so that 'profane' people couldn't muck up the works. The notion that certain 'Knowledge' regarding these sacred numbers was enshrined in Myths is not a foolish one; indeed, Joseph Campbell (no slouch when it came to the study of world myths) wrote a book about the subject, THE INNER REACHES OF OUTER SPACE. By all means, fault Randall for his bad spelling and for misquoting an occasional source, but don't throw the baby out with his bathwater. We still don't know how the f*@& the Egyptians were able to get those humongous granite blocks all the way up to the levels they're situated in the Great Pyramid -- a feat which modern attempts at pyramid constructing fails miserably at.

    • @jasonpuckett3112
      @jasonpuckett3112 2 місяці тому +1

      While interesting, your calendar does not address any of the discussion in the video, other than you also seem to believe in sacred numbers. Carlson is fabricating the numbers, to support his theory that there are sacred numbers "encoded" in the dimensions of pyramids.Whether you believe in the validity of sacred numbers is moot, because he's making up the evidence. Also, it's no secret how the pyramids were built, but there is some debate where the ramps were

    • @JxKITCH
      @JxKITCH Місяць тому

      Thank you for the excellent comment.

  • @anrit5972
    @anrit5972 Годину тому

    If we were marvelling at the Great Spheroid of Giza I may very well conclude that Randall was onto something..

  • @eodyn7
    @eodyn7 5 днів тому +1

    Loved the video! Topics like this should be talked about. Dishonest amateur academics need to be called out and corrected.

  • @LesterBrunt
    @LesterBrunt 3 місяці тому +27

    The most amazing thing about Carlson is that he somehow, someway, managed to create a public image of himself as this heavyweight, big brain, universally acclaimed, undeniable mastermind. Like, "you might disagree with Hancock, that is possible, but nobody can deny anything The Great Carlson says, when he enters the discussion you listen, you don't argue". When all he has is a great imagination. Standing on some terrain and painting a picture of giant ice dams carving the land like butter is fun and cool, but hardly insightful, it is just an imagined picture, makes for a great story though.

    • @JGProspecting
      @JGProspecting 3 місяці тому

      You do understand the ice dams and great floods are proven in the mainstream don't you ? Baa baa sheep sheep

    • @colinhayter4029
      @colinhayter4029 3 місяці тому +1

      A popularity happens out from entertaining the average intelligence of the target audience

    • @jefft6802
      @jefft6802 3 місяці тому +5

      The average intelligence is certainly on full display on this message board.

    • @mattpotter8725
      @mattpotter8725 3 місяці тому +5

      I do think that is you have a certain charisma and get yourself known in a certain area of the entertainment business, invited into podcasts that millions listen to, in some cases are backed by big money and those with with alterior motives (and I'm talking maybe more about certain political factions rather than Carlson, but who knows) then I'm not surprised cults grow around people like this and they get given tv shows like Graham Hancock has because it's not about presenting fact and how new discoveries have changed our views on history, because that involves a lot more work, probably isn't as exciting, and probably doesn't get the same viewership as presenting alt history as fact by claiming what you say is true without having anything but some numbers and wild supperstition that can't be disproven to back it up, because this makes certain media companies more money.

    • @francischambless5919
      @francischambless5919 3 місяці тому +1

      lol. take a Geology course, I dare you.

  • @probablynotmyname8521
    @probablynotmyname8521 3 місяці тому +12

    Theres a lot of drawing space on the pyramids, it seems to me to be far easier to just write down the measurements rather than trying to encode them into the design of the pyramids. Non engineers seem to think engineering is about being clever, it isnt, its about getting things done. Its also about constant tradeoffs, encoding things into a design is error prone, time consuming and expensive and your pharaoh client just wants it done.

    • @bobobobos2425
      @bobobobos2425 3 місяці тому +1

      the original white limestone coating was allegedly covered in hyeroglyphs - so it was probably written down

    • @olybears57
      @olybears57 3 місяці тому

      Yeah sounds a lot more like an egotistical architects idea 😂

    • @probablynotmyname8521
      @probablynotmyname8521 3 місяці тому +5

      @@bobobobos2425 really because the bottom casing stones aren’t, this is just an unsubstantiated rumour

    • @hedgehog3180
      @hedgehog3180 2 місяці тому

      Also encoding natural constants into a building is like a very modern idea, like that's the kind of thing we might do as a fun gag when making an art project or building the new physics department. It wouldn't really make sense for a society that hasn't developed science since they wouldn't place any special value on these constants, and also obviously wouldn't know them. We only care about them because we live in a technology and science based society so science and its achievements hold great value to us but an Ancient Egyptian would probably think that's kinda silly compared to honoring the Pharoah since they more or less saw the Pharoah as a god.

    • @bobobobos2425
      @bobobobos2425 2 місяці тому

      @@hedgehog3180 I just don't buy that the builders were primitive or accidently got it right why is it so hard for people to admit that we have no clue who built them or how or what they were for? 🤔

  • @CapriSuntStulti
    @CapriSuntStulti 2 місяці тому +2

    Imagine the IRS agent that has to sort through this guys tax return

  • @monkerud2108
    @monkerud2108 3 місяці тому +2

    the hypothesis if we re-frame it in a sensible way, is that the dimensions on the pyramid is related to the oblate shape of the earth, then we don't need to talk about numerology, absolute values or anything of the sort, we don't need to care about whether the pyramid is close to the equator either, this is just something that seems relevant to what Randall is saying, because he doesn't know how to phrase his idea in the best way possible, then the idea would be that they knew the shape of the earth and it is connected to the size of the meridian vs the equator, then all we need to do is ask, within the precision of that relationship, does it even make any sense? could they have had a rough idea? and could it be a complete coincidence? the answer to all three questions is yes, it is not that complicated to get the idea that the earth is spinning, nor that spinning objects become oblate, but it is also really easy to produce an architectural feature that accidentally is in the 1% ratio range. therefore in my humble estimation, it is irrelevant that the ratio is as it is to the question being asked, without a secondary string of evidence for it, it is simple impossible to deny or confirm such an hypothesis, because it could be true that they knew it was roughly 1% oblate, but it is most certainly true that a roughly 1% ratio could be found in such a monument with no other intent than aesthetics. it doesn't really matter whether we knew it was true that the Egyptians knew that, we still would not know that ratio is reflected in that ration of the monument, because it is just a very simple to find kind of coincidence, if it was next to the fine structure constant and the spectral lines of hydrogen then sure, but one such measure is just expected for any building.

  • @Vo_Siri
    @Vo_Siri 3 місяці тому +20

    It really fucks me off every time he says “socle”, because he’s using the term wrong. A socle is the protruding base for something like a column or a wall, not the foundation on which an entire building rests. It feels like he’s literally just using the term because he knows most audience members won’t be familiar with it, which makes it sound like impressive jargon.

    • @Tucker93669
      @Tucker93669 2 місяці тому +2

      You literally argued for why he's correct LOL

  • @inoshikachokonoyarobakayar2493
    @inoshikachokonoyarobakayar2493 3 місяці тому +4

    I think it's even worse to lie about the numbers from a spiritual perspective. This proves to me that Carlson knows it's lies & has no problem exploiting ppl. He has no interest in spiritual truth.

  • @Crabby303
    @Crabby303 3 місяці тому +2

    Dunno how you have the patience to debunk this tomfoolery but I guess someone's got to do it, so thanks.

  • @edgarsnake2857
    @edgarsnake2857 3 місяці тому

    Thanks for the facts. Doc.

  • @velvetmagnetta3074
    @velvetmagnetta3074 3 місяці тому +3

    I am about to blow Randall Carlson'a mind. I just got a divine download straight into my brain pan that enlightened me to the deep universal knowledge that every single one of Randall's sacred numbers use the SAME 10 NUMBERS!!!
    Every. Single. One.
    0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
    Boom! 💥 Mind blown, right?

  • @Clone42
    @Clone42 3 місяці тому +13

    The mathematician is as gifted a communicator as Dr. Miano is gifted in mathematics. I appreciate the effort. The struggle is real.

    • @BasedKungFu
      @BasedKungFu 3 місяці тому +3

      Yeah she failed to land the plane a couple times so I was personally struggling to follow along at points.

    • @chazdomingo475
      @chazdomingo475 3 місяці тому +3

      Kind of an interesting juxtaposition with Carlson, who always speaks clearly and concisely. Who would the layman be more inclined to believe?

    • @Clone42
      @Clone42 3 місяці тому +2

      @@chazdomingo475Dr. Miano himself is also a very crisp communicator.

    • @MossyMozart
      @MossyMozart 3 місяці тому +3

      @Clone42 - Ms Burnell sometimes assumed we knew more than some of us do (meaning me!). But she was NOWHERE near as baffling as Carlson!

    • @maidende8280
      @maidende8280 3 місяці тому +3

      I had no trouble understanding them. Maybe it just went over your head.

  • @anrit5972
    @anrit5972 29 хвилин тому

    The Egyptians seemed way too preoccupied empire building, building elaborate tombs, temples, death rituals and getting admitted into the afterworld to have any time to consider the size of the earth

  • @Armyjay
    @Armyjay 3 місяці тому +2

    I’d love to know - Do they believe all the crap they talk about? Or is it a cynical grift? What do they tell themselves in order to assuage a guilty conscience?

  • @BSIII
    @BSIII 3 місяці тому +130

    Keep em coming, Dr. Miano. You're a thorn in a lost ancient high technology grifter's side.

    • @notafortnitegamer
      @notafortnitegamer 3 місяці тому +14

      lol what a silly comment, a person suggests we misunderstand our ancient history so they must be a grifter!!

    • @BSIII
      @BSIII 3 місяці тому

      ​​@@notafortnitegamer How is it silly when these guys refuse to accept being wrong and refuse the proof as such? Making up all of these intricate lies to sell for profit and notoriety is a grift. This isn't trying to find truth. It's intentionally being deceptive.

    • @BSIII
      @BSIII 3 місяці тому +35

      ​@@notafortnitegamer idk why my reply didn't post.
      Intentionally being deceptive to profit from is a g rift. You can't sit here and listen to the many points showing how wrong (and clearly intentionally) Randall is and pretend like he's just trying to find truth. Wake up. These guys aren't about truth or history.

    • @Crannogman4686
      @Crannogman4686 3 місяці тому +30

      ​@@notafortnitegamer he's a grifter because he makes obviously false claims to sell books

    • @MrAchile13
      @MrAchile13 3 місяці тому

      @@notafortnitegamer they don't "suggest", they purposefully ignore the science and spread pseudo-science to gullible people, in order to make money. That's what I call grifting.