Love the way Christopher just gets right to the point. Lots of valuable information in a short amount of time. So much more efficiency than other videos.
very on point and much-needed video, thanks for the info, one more thing I think it's important to mention the Weights as well as many people using these lenses over the Sony G Master lens for video use as its less heavy and easy to use. Specially when using with a Gimbal. Sigma 28-70 16.6 oz / 470 g Tamron 28-75 1.21 lb / 550 g Sigma 24-70 1.84 lb / 835 g
Another great video, thank you Christopher. A little late for me however as I have had the Tamron since the first release almost 2 years ago now. It has been bashed and crashed and is still going well. I like it so much I just bought its bigger brother, the 70-180mm. I hope it is as robust as the original. Thanks again.
While my personal copy of the 2470 hasn't had dust issues (yet), I've read a fair amount of complaints on the tamron too. And since dust doesn't typically affect image quality until a LOT accumulates, I chose the 2470 over the tamron due to it being wider and nicer bokeh.
@@probolehla that sucks to hear. I started using mine tons lately and it only has a couple of more specks inside. Here (GTA, southern Ontario) there's a place we can drop it off at to have it cleaned/resealed for free under the warranty. Hopefully you have something too?
Sigma 24-70 F2.8 owner here, one thing worth noting is that the Sigma 28-70 is not weather sealed. It has a rubber o ring at the mount only. So it's unlikely to let water into your camera but the lens won't hold up so well.
I hardly ever put a comment on the (many) videos I watch. But I have to do it today. I haae watched and watched your channel videos that helped me understand and buy the gear I need. You do an extraordinary job in getting fair and detailed comparisons and tests. Thank you for your great job.
Well done, as are all of your reviews. The results are exactly what I suspected... Although the Sigma 28-75mm has a very slight edge over the Tamron, the difference will not cause me to switch form the Tamron, with which I have been shooting for several years now! I have been very happy with the 28-75mm on both full frame and APSC format cameras...
I have had all three lenses. The lens I have now is the Tamron G2. I find the AF and contrast must better on it than the Sigma 24-70 lens I had. So had to send the Sigma back and keep the Tamron.
@@DavidChiriboga Hey David! The weight is a problem tbh but I love the images that come out of this lens so I think it’s worth it. My friend has the Tamron 28-75, though that lens is lighter but he also admires this Sigma.
Thank you for the review as usual. Just purchased a Sigma 28-70 for its light weight and small size even though 24-70 is definitely a better performer. The lens was on sale so it was cheaper than Tamron 28-75. Hope I won’t regret.
Thanks for the comparison! Wanted to make one myself. I have one huge negative with the Sigma 24-70 and that is the dust collection within the lens it self. With the Tamron I did not experience this. The smaller sigma 28-70 is a nice alternative if compared directly with the Tamron. Although I might miss the 75mm reach. Also nice to mention that the Tamron lenses all have the same filter thread 67mm if not mistaken. Eiher way you cannot go "wrong" with one of them. Really curious to see if sigma is also going to make a light wide angle zoom or telezoom lens
I wonder if the new sigma 28-70 will easily collect dust too. I mean, same concept design as the 24-70, and much less weather gaskets inside. Sounds like a dust disaster waiting to happen!
I really don't understand why people talk about having dust in their lens--I've never seen it have any effect on image quality whatsoever. I guess theoretically if you're at f16 or something the contrast could suffer where the dust is? Not even sure that's true.
There's no evidence that a lens being weather sealed makes it more or less likely to get moldy. Moisture and mold spores can get in any lens. Even if you assumed that it's harder for moisture and spores to get in lenses that are better sealed, it also means that it's harder to ventilate the lens and for moisture to get out once it gets in. If you have expensive lenses, you should make sure they are stored in a dry environment and they get sunlight regularly. That's the real solution to this problem. You can buy a dry box on Amazon for 100 USD or so.
Hmm I got 24-70 Art for $899 on Black Friday. Yes, it's heavy but for its price, it has been fantastic. I really liked Sigma 18-35 design that zooms and focuses internally.
I’m pretty sure that people who take their photography very seriously get these lenses, too. They are not just an intermediate step. They simply are budget-ish options. And, keep in mind, the Sigma lenses are first party on L-Mount.
I really love my sigma 24-70 2.8 dg dn lens. It's seriously amazing for landscapes and even did better than the sony 24-70 gm that I tested it against shooting the same scenes at the same time. My first 24-70 and It's amazing.
@@DavidChiriboga did you find the answer to that :")? I'm also considering it I loved it from the reviews but everyone was talking about the size and weight :")
I came here to see if new sigma has advantages in addition to size and weight over sigma 24-70 Art. As an enthusiast, I am a bit struggling with the weight of 24-70 art lens, but I'll keep considering its optic quality and more importantly due to its wider focal length.
@@PASquared Yeah, for all kinds of longer telephoto use as well as fastest short telephotos 95mm is very common also. So I would say that only 105mm and especially larger than that are not so common (105mm is still quite cheap and easily available).
@Yak Almighty I'm trying to have all lenses with 67mm too = easy to swap magnetic ND filters, probably will never happen 😦 some nice lenses out there that are not 67mm
Thank you Christopher, very informative video. I recently bought an A7III and am thinking about either the 28-70 or 24-70.
Рік тому+1
Thanks! I'm not sure you have any L-mount cameras? If not you should try a second hand Panasonic S5, because then you can try out the Panasonic 24-70 S- Pro 2.8, it really a stunning lens, as are all the little 1.8 Panasonic primes, I think you'd enjoy them all.
Great video as always Christ. I love this tri-comparison format! Would have loved to have seen focus breathing comparisons too since that is really important for video!
hi super reviews you're performing, i'm following your job since some years..... i personaly prefer struggling with fixed lens focals and move my feet rather than acquiring expensive zoom lens. I love your way of evaluating lenses.Please keep doing your fantastic job on line...Thanx
I like the Sigma 28-70mm 2.8 because of the size. However, it's kind of soft at 70mm and I'm afraid of dust. I will wait will until people confirm if dust is an issue long term. Also, hoping price drops as well.
Great review as always, to the point. I just wish you had shown the same bokeh shot of that teacandle on the shelf for all 3 lenses. Many report that the Sigma 24-70mm sucks in a lot of dust. 220 USD extra for the Sigma 24-70, may not really be worth saving to get only 28mm widest and poor close up performance. I think the 28-70 would be more appealing at around 700 USD, maybe 750. Anyway, all these lenses are more than good enough, you can take great photos with any if you have talent. the small 28-70/75 may be nice for event photography. Maybe the Tamron 28-200 is a better buy after all than the 28-70.
Great review! Picked up the 24-70 a while back and some thoughts: -It's the heaviest of the bunch and it matters especially if you're using it for an extended period -Can confirm that dust does build up behind the front element Given the 28-75's poor bokeh performance I'd go for the 28-70 and pair it with a wide angle prime
@@professionalpotato4764 I believe there's a video on youtube somewhere with some guy showing you how to do it. I personally wouldn't do it but if it bothers you that much I guess that'd be an option
true it's a bit heavy but no lens is perfect. I just got the lens today, feels like a beast. I read some people complain about dust getting inside the glass, but it shouldn't be an issue with the images... hopefully
@@jbello9398 Ah, don't worry about the dust. Dust in the lens never has any effect on image quality whatsoever. I've even heard the head of a large lens rental company say that they have to clean out dust from their rental lenses every once in a while--not because it has an effect on image quality, but because some people THINK it does. Also, a lens getting dust in it isn't necessarily related to how well it keeps water and moisture out, or its likelihood to get moldy, which are real problems. Plus, I've owned the Sigma for about a year now and mine really doesn't have noticeable dust in it yet.
Not from me either. The smaller Sigma looks cuter but the Tamron fits in my camera bags and neither would fit in a jacket pocket with a camera attached and I rather like the Tamron bokeh at times : )
@@Vantrakter bokeh is very subjective so it’s never worth too much to listen to what someone else thinks about it. If I want a lot of bokeh and a really creamy background I’ll use a prime. They’re no doubt all great lenses and you can’t go wrong with any of them! Just for me, if someone gave me the chance to swap for either of the other two, I wouldn’t!
Does anyone know how Sony 24-105G F4 is comparing to these lenses from sharpness and "micro contrast" perspective? (the OSS, smaller aperture and wider focal length range is an obvious difference of course)
Sigma 24-70 is really tempting, I wish for a similarly priced and performed sigma 16-35 f/2.8 for Sony. Sigma 14-24 is great, but I'm a circular filter guy 🙁
When you tested the Sigma 24-70, did you account for its strong field curvature when testing the corner sharpness? I found that the corners are much sharper when you focus on them as opposed to the center of the frame. It's a little annoying when you have an element closer to the lens (adds an extra step to focus stacking), but not too bad at the end of the day.
Bottom line: If you need 24mm get the art The only real reason to get the Sigma 28-70 for E-mount is if you demand the absolute smallest option.. and maybe a hair better less "busy" bokeh. If that`s not you get the tammy, would much rather trust it in harsher conditions
I use A7Riv, for travel photography, Sigma 28-70 is 80 grams less than the Tamron, with just additional 150 grams, I can bring the laowa 14mm F4 as well, it's excellent combo for travel. Just do some post corpping I can say this combo enough for almost all scenario.
The only thing still keeping me away from the Sigma 24-70mm 2.8 is, that I quite often read about dust collecting behind the front lense. Does your copy also suffer from that issue?
My house seems to be a dust generator and I'm not particularly strict at keeping my stuff clean. I have one spec of dust so I'd say it has the issue but I've never noticed it in any of the images I've taken, and it seems mild given the conditions they're used in.
This, if you can live without the 4mm on the wide end. Personally I'd go for the 24-70 sigma, would be nice to have it compared against the Sony GM though.
@Bijo S Different question: Why would you ignore optical flaws on a lens (which, in this case, happens to be a zoom lens), when there are better options? Bokeh is usually not the main priority in photography, but if it looks THAT terrible, it's a serious point against a lens that might otherwise be used for a few portraits here and there.
@@jeroenvdw For the weight of the 24-70 Sigma, I can bring BOTH the Sigma 28-70 AND the Tamron 17-28 with me. 24mm is not wide at all, I always need something wider.
I have the Sigma 28-70, I love its lightness and overall image quality. Though I find myself often maxing out on zoom, exactly where the lens is weakest. When I shoot f2.8 at 70mm the area just out of focus often looks noisy...almost like motion blur...it annoys me to the point I wish I had gone with the 24-70 ART. Or, perhaps I need something with more zoom since Im maxing it out all the time.
I feel like not mentioning af performance is an oversight. One lens being slightly sharper than the other won't make a noticeable difference in most circumstances, but focus reliability is something that very much impacts ones shooting experience and keeper rate.
How ballsy for Sigma to omit a couple weather sealing gaskets and fluorine coating on the 28-70 with that retail price! Probably to up sell their 24-70. I’d take the Tamron over the 28-70.
If not for the busy bokeh, I'd go with the Tamron (I have the 17-70 for my a6xxx series camera). As it stands, I'm undecided. I'll have to view more Tamron images to see if the bokeh is decent enough or not.
Exactly the video I was looking for Chris. Thanks. Are you planning on doing a Sony Vs Samyang 35 1.4 comparison? I bought the Samyang after watching your video and I do love it. Some of the best bokeh I've seen! I've even thought about getting their 85 because of it and selling my Sony G 85.
I would be really interessted to see how the real BUDGET option, the litte Sony 28-60 kit lens, would compare here. It has recieved a lot of praise for its optics and still everyone complains about the price. Guess build quality sucks real bad ;)
CHRISTOPHER, why isn't there a lens similar to the Sigma 18-35 1.8 for Sony apsc E-MOUNT? I mean, that lens already exists, it's not impossible to do. Even with 18-24mm I would settle.
I think the Sigma 24-70mm is way too big, just like all the other older Sigma lenses designed for DSLR's. I own - and love the - Tamron! But if the Sigma 28-70mm existed back then, that would have been a difficult choice. Maybe I would have gone with the Sigma instead!
Thank you very much for the comparison. So the bokeh of the Sigma 28-75 is somewhat better than the Sigma 24-70? This is the one thing that bothers me a little with the latter as I've heard the bokeh is subpar. There was also the concern with dust incursion but according to a Sigma rep I emailed today, they're made fixes to improve it in that regard.
I found the Sigma 28-70 to have very slightly smoother bokeh than the 24-70, but my tests were hardly exhaustive - they're both excellent in that regard
Hey Chris, when are you going to do the epic 50F1.2, head to head battle, between the RF vs Z? Throw the OTUS 55F1.4 in the mix too, if you can. It’ll hit a million views....easy! Z vs OTUS(Sony) vs RF. You’ll be the first to do this comparison between three brands. You’ll be an instant YouTub 🌟! Come on Chris, Just Do It!
If you check focus breathing, then you might know the 24-70mm Art is way ahead of the tamron, have not yet used the new sigma 28-70 C, no comment on that.
Love the way Christopher just gets right to the point. Lots of valuable information in a short amount of time. So much more efficiency than other videos.
I always refer to your videos when buying lenses, so this is a thank you. (from Japan)
Thanks for your support!
Just talked about this review and 5 min later its online. Perfect!
very on point and much-needed video, thanks for the info, one more thing I think it's important to mention the Weights as well as many people using these lenses over the Sony G Master lens for video use as its less heavy and easy to use.
Specially when using with a Gimbal.
Sigma 28-70 16.6 oz / 470 g
Tamron 28-75 1.21 lb / 550 g
Sigma 24-70 1.84 lb / 835 g
I think worth to mention the tamron is fully weather sealed not like the Sigma 28-70.
Just because Tamron markets their sealing more doesn't mean it is better.
@@QuietOC ever heard of the "dust sucker" sigma 2470art?
@@QuietOC it's not "markets their weather sealing more." The sigma 29-70 doesn't have ANY gaskets other than the lens mount.
@@QuietOC lol its definitely more than just marketing...
Moral of the story is to get the weather sealed Sigma 24-70
Another great video, thank you Christopher. A little late for me however as I have had the Tamron since the first release almost 2 years ago now. It has been bashed and crashed and is still going well. I like it so much I just bought its bigger brother, the 70-180mm. I hope it is as robust as the original. Thanks again.
I prefer 24mm on the wide end as well. The Sigma 24-70 is on my shopping list
While my personal copy of the 2470 hasn't had dust issues (yet), I've read a fair amount of complaints on the tamron too. And since dust doesn't typically affect image quality until a LOT accumulates, I chose the 2470 over the tamron due to it being wider and nicer bokeh.
got mine for one month.. already got 2 small dust underneath the first layer of glass :’)
@@probolehla that sucks to hear. I started using mine tons lately and it only has a couple of more specks inside. Here (GTA, southern Ontario) there's a place we can drop it off at to have it cleaned/resealed for free under the warranty. Hopefully you have something too?
Great comparison video. Now that there's a new Tamron 28-75 G2, I hope you can compare them again, but with the new G2 lens.
Sigma 24-70 F2.8 owner here, one thing worth noting is that the Sigma 28-70 is not weather sealed. It has a rubber o ring at the mount only. So it's unlikely to let water into your camera but the lens won't hold up so well.
Thank you for pointing out that, deal breaker for me as weather sealing must have in country I leave.
I hardly ever put a comment on the (many) videos I watch. But I have to do it today. I haae watched and watched your channel videos that helped me understand and buy the gear I need. You do an extraordinary job in getting fair and detailed comparisons and tests. Thank you for your great job.
Thank you Chris. Useful comparison. For portrait photography I will choose the sigma 28-70 due to the lighter weight and smooth bokeh.
Wating so hard for Sigma to come with RFs ...
As always, great Video! I just love your Reviews!
I like the side-by-side comparison - hope that will come more often in the future
Great video, thanks. It would be good to see this updated with the Tamron 2875 g2, and include the 2470gm2 to see if and by how much it is beter!
Well done, as are all of your reviews. The results are exactly what I suspected... Although the Sigma 28-75mm has a very slight edge over the Tamron, the difference will not cause me to switch form the Tamron, with which I have been shooting for several years now! I have been very happy with the 28-75mm on both full frame and APSC format cameras...
28-75 is enough for me. For the budget with a7iii 😍
FYI at 2:04, you've got the title text flipped for the Sigma 28-70 and the Tamron 28-75..
I have had all three lenses. The lens I have now is the Tamron G2. I find the AF and contrast must better on it than the Sigma 24-70 lens I had. So had to send the Sigma back and keep the Tamron.
Glad to know that my 24-70 f2.8 that I bought used/like-new for $900 is still a good deal :)
I'm looking for something as light as possible, do you think the Sigma 28-70 would still edge out the new Tamron G2?
Thanks for comparison, Christopher. I have just got my Sigma 24-70 and I love it.
How is it feeling? Is the size and weight an issue casual usage?
@@DavidChiriboga Hey David! The weight is a problem tbh but I love the images that come out of this lens so I think it’s worth it. My friend has the Tamron 28-75, though that lens is lighter but he also admires this Sigma.
Thank you for the review as usual. Just purchased a Sigma 28-70 for its light weight and small size even though 24-70 is definitely a better performer. The lens was on sale so it was cheaper than Tamron 28-75. Hope I won’t regret.
Any updates?
Thanks for the comparison! Wanted to make one myself.
I have one huge negative with the Sigma 24-70 and that is the dust collection within the lens it self. With the Tamron I did not experience this.
The smaller sigma 28-70 is a nice alternative if compared directly with the Tamron. Although I might miss the 75mm reach.
Also nice to mention that the Tamron lenses all have the same filter thread 67mm if not mistaken.
Eiher way you cannot go "wrong" with one of them. Really curious to see if sigma is also going to make a light wide angle zoom or telezoom lens
I have observed dust in back of this sigma 28-70 in this video.
I wonder if the new sigma 28-70 will easily collect dust too. I mean, same concept design as the 24-70, and much less weather gaskets inside. Sounds like a dust disaster waiting to happen!
I really don't understand why people talk about having dust in their lens--I've never seen it have any effect on image quality whatsoever. I guess theoretically if you're at f16 or something the contrast could suffer where the dust is? Not even sure that's true.
@@Tzadeck if dust gets in it easy, moisture gets it in it easy and i've had fungus before in lenses (that had dust in it)
There's no evidence that a lens being weather sealed makes it more or less likely to get moldy. Moisture and mold spores can get in any lens. Even if you assumed that it's harder for moisture and spores to get in lenses that are better sealed, it also means that it's harder to ventilate the lens and for moisture to get out once it gets in.
If you have expensive lenses, you should make sure they are stored in a dry environment and they get sunlight regularly. That's the real solution to this problem. You can buy a dry box on Amazon for 100 USD or so.
I am soooo thankful, that's exactly the comparison I was looking for!
The most valuable comparison video of the year
Hmm I got 24-70 Art for $899 on Black Friday. Yes, it's heavy but for its price, it has been fantastic. I really liked Sigma 18-35 design that zooms and focuses internally.
I would have loved to see the Sony 24-105 in this lineup because it is generally less expensive here in Australia than the Sigma 24-70!
Is it 2.8?
Superb comparison. Very clear and demonstrates the most salient points for most people.
I’m pretty sure that people who take their photography very seriously get these lenses, too. They are not just an intermediate step. They simply are budget-ish options. And, keep in mind, the Sigma lenses are first party on L-Mount.
I really love my sigma 24-70 2.8 dg dn lens. It's seriously amazing for landscapes and even did better than the sony 24-70 gm that I tested it against shooting the same scenes at the same time. My first 24-70 and It's amazing.
How have you felt about the size and weight for casual usage and carrying around? That’s my only concern as a first time pro lens buyer.
Does it gather dust?
@@DavidChiriboga did you find the answer to that :")? I'm also considering it I loved it from the reviews but everyone was talking about the size and weight :")
I came here to see if new sigma has advantages in addition to size and weight over sigma 24-70 Art. As an enthusiast, I am a bit struggling with the weight of 24-70 art lens, but I'll keep considering its optic quality and more importantly due to its wider focal length.
love your reviews. Best channel to compare lenses. go on like this...🙂
Thank you so much for this video! I was lockig for a comparison of these lenses and as allways, I can find the best data here :).
Great comparison Chris as usual. Clear n concise!!
Excellent review as always! Please, review the Tamron 28-200 for Sony E. Cheers!
A huge thank you Mr. Frost. Waiting on pins and needles for a review like this. Need a good zoom for my SL2. 24-70mm gets the nod! Cheers
If you use filters, bear in mind that the 24-70 has an enormous 82mm filter thread.
82mm has become the new norm these days for pro zooms, whereas the norm used to be 77mm
@@PASquared Yeah, for all kinds of longer telephoto use as well as fastest short telephotos 95mm is very common also. So I would say that only 105mm and especially larger than that are not so common (105mm is still quite cheap and easily available).
@@PASquared eh pretty much all my sony lenses use 67mm thread (Tamron 17-28, Tamron 28-75, Tamron 70-180, Sigma 35 1.4, Sony 85 1.8)
@@YakAlmighty I guess I should have said Pro OEM/Camera brand zooms.
@Yak Almighty I'm trying to have all lenses with 67mm too = easy to swap magnetic ND filters, probably will never happen 😦 some nice lenses out there that are not 67mm
Thank you Christopher, very informative video. I recently bought an A7III and am thinking about either the 28-70 or 24-70.
Thanks! I'm not sure you have any L-mount cameras? If not you should try a second hand Panasonic S5, because then you can try out the Panasonic 24-70 S- Pro 2.8, it really a stunning lens, as are all the little 1.8 Panasonic primes, I think you'd enjoy them all.
Great video as always Christ. I love this tri-comparison format! Would have loved to have seen focus breathing comparisons too since that is really important for video!
hi super reviews you're performing, i'm following your job since some years..... i personaly prefer struggling with fixed lens focals and move my feet rather than acquiring expensive zoom lens. I love your way of evaluating lenses.Please keep doing your fantastic job on line...Thanx
my go-to reviewer for sony lenses! Waitin on your Tamron 17-70 review:)
I like the Sigma 28-70mm 2.8 because of the size. However, it's kind of soft at 70mm and I'm afraid of dust. I will wait will until people confirm if dust is an issue long term. Also, hoping price drops as well.
Great review as always, to the point. I just wish you had shown the same bokeh shot of that teacandle on the shelf for all 3 lenses. Many report that the Sigma 24-70mm sucks in a lot of dust. 220 USD extra for the Sigma 24-70, may not really be worth saving to get only 28mm widest and poor close up performance. I think the 28-70 would be more appealing at around 700 USD, maybe 750. Anyway, all these lenses are more than good enough, you can take great photos with any if you have talent. the small 28-70/75 may be nice for event photography. Maybe the Tamron 28-200 is a better buy after all than the 28-70.
Great review! Picked up the 24-70 a while back and some thoughts:
-It's the heaviest of the bunch and it matters especially if you're using it for an extended period
-Can confirm that dust does build up behind the front element
Given the 28-75's poor bokeh performance I'd go for the 28-70 and pair it with a wide angle prime
Is there any way to clean it apart from sending it in for servicing?
@@professionalpotato4764 I believe there's a video on youtube somewhere with some guy showing you how to do it. I personally wouldn't do it but if it bothers you that much I guess that'd be an option
So you would go with the 28-70 out of these three?
Have you used a protective filter with it? Or does it suck air when zooming in and out?
VERY helpful, thanks so much, Christopher!!!
Good. I have the Sigma 24-70 and I'm glad to see that it's still on top, haha. It is a bit heavy though.
true it's a bit heavy but no lens is perfect. I just got the lens today, feels like a beast. I read some people complain about dust getting inside the glass, but it shouldn't be an issue with the images... hopefully
@@jbello9398 Ah, don't worry about the dust. Dust in the lens never has any effect on image quality whatsoever. I've even heard the head of a large lens rental company say that they have to clean out dust from their rental lenses every once in a while--not because it has an effect on image quality, but because some people THINK it does.
Also, a lens getting dust in it isn't necessarily related to how well it keeps water and moisture out, or its likelihood to get moldy, which are real problems.
Plus, I've owned the Sigma for about a year now and mine really doesn't have noticeable dust in it yet.
Great comparison. Thank you very much! Very helpful.
At this point, lets agree to wait sigma series for every sony lens
The Tamron has been my favourite lens for my a7iii since I first got it. I just love the images it produces. No complaints with it for me!
Not from me either. The smaller Sigma looks cuter but the Tamron fits in my camera bags and neither would fit in a jacket pocket with a camera attached and I rather like the Tamron bokeh at times : )
@@Vantrakter bokeh is very subjective so it’s never worth too much to listen to what someone else thinks about it. If I want a lot of bokeh and a really creamy background I’ll use a prime. They’re no doubt all great lenses and you can’t go wrong with any of them! Just for me, if someone gave me the chance to swap for either of the other two, I wouldn’t!
PLEASE repeat this with the new version of the Tamron and add the Samyang 24-70 f2.8.
it should be noted that the 24-70 DG DN Art is 800GBP on E-infinity etc
Great review. No contest...save up for the 24-70 💁🏻♂️
Thanks Chris. Great comparison!
Does anyone know how Sony 24-105G F4 is comparing to these lenses from sharpness and "micro contrast" perspective?
(the OSS, smaller aperture and wider focal length range is an obvious difference of course)
Sigma 24-70 is really tempting, I wish for a similarly priced and performed sigma 16-35 f/2.8 for Sony. Sigma 14-24 is great, but I'm a circular filter guy 🙁
Size matters and the sigma 28-70 hits a grand slam.
really thanks for comparison 👌
definitely sigma 24-70 is the best choice
I prefer a smaller lens. So, the sigma 28-70 is my choice here
When you tested the Sigma 24-70, did you account for its strong field curvature when testing the corner sharpness? I found that the corners are much sharper when you focus on them as opposed to the center of the frame. It's a little annoying when you have an element closer to the lens (adds an extra step to focus stacking), but not too bad at the end of the day.
Bottom line:
If you need 24mm get the art
The only real reason to get the Sigma 28-70 for E-mount is if you demand the absolute smallest option.. and maybe a hair better less "busy" bokeh. If that`s not you get the tammy, would much rather trust it in harsher conditions
For the 24-70mm 's weight, I can bring both the Sigma 28-70mm and the Tamron 17-28mm with me.
I use A7Riv, for travel photography, Sigma 28-70 is 80 grams less than the Tamron, with just additional 150 grams, I can bring the laowa 14mm F4 as well, it's excellent combo for travel. Just do some post corpping I can say this combo enough for almost all scenario.
Bought the Tamron 28-75 and 17-28 recently. Super happy with the sharpness and especially the cost but yes the bokeh is slightly busier.
Thank you for such an excellent presentation!
With that focal length range, it's the only lens you need for most of the time.
You missed one important detail: Tamron is weather sealed, and Sigma 28-70 is not.
Much needed video.. Thanks mate! 👍
Thank you for this Chris!
Very nice review. For me the new SIgma 28-70 is the winner because of its size and nice bokeh. I will consider this one. Thanks a lot.
Tamron has a Weird Bokeh.... Definitely Go For Sigma 24-70mm. Paired on my A7III. Amazing. No Dust Issues, but I hate the weights. Thanks For Reviews
Excellent video as always. Have you considered reviewing the Tamron 17-70 for Sony APSC?
The only thing still keeping me away from the Sigma 24-70mm 2.8 is, that I quite often read about dust collecting behind the front lense.
Does your copy also suffer from that issue?
Same here
I have that lens and I don't have that issue.
My house seems to be a dust generator and I'm not particularly strict at keeping my stuff clean. I have one spec of dust so I'd say it has the issue but I've never noticed it in any of the images I've taken, and it seems mild given the conditions they're used in.
No i own both Tamron and Sigma.. and kept the Sigme 24-70 instead
They seem to have fixed it. Mine was from the fresh batch of October 2020 and no speck of dust yet.
I would go for the Sigma 28-70. The Sigma 24-70 is just way too heavy. The Tamron doesn't have a chance because of its terrible bokeh.
this.
This, if you can live without the 4mm on the wide end. Personally I'd go for the 24-70 sigma, would be nice to have it compared against the Sony GM though.
@Bijo S Different question: Why would you ignore optical flaws on a lens (which, in this case, happens to be a zoom lens), when there are better options?
Bokeh is usually not the main priority in photography, but if it looks THAT terrible, it's a serious point against a lens that might otherwise be used for a few portraits here and there.
@Bijo S Why would you get a full-frame camera if you don't need any bokeh at all? Just use your phone
@@jeroenvdw For the weight of the 24-70 Sigma, I can bring BOTH the Sigma 28-70 AND the Tamron 17-28 with me. 24mm is not wide at all, I always need something wider.
Thanks for the detailed comparision
I have the Sigma 28-70, I love its lightness and overall image quality. Though I find myself often maxing out on zoom, exactly where the lens is weakest. When I shoot f2.8 at 70mm the area just out of focus often looks noisy...almost like motion blur...it annoys me to the point I wish I had gone with the 24-70 ART. Or, perhaps I need something with more zoom since Im maxing it out all the time.
Get the Sony 24-105 G!
@@ayekaye8055 Yea, that wouldn't be a bad pick. Tamron 35-150 is high on my list now
@@slimaneghodbane2727 I personally would, yes!
@slimaneghodbane2727 it's am incredible lens as long as you have at least decent light of course
I feel like not mentioning af performance is an oversight. One lens being slightly sharper than the other won't make a noticeable difference in most circumstances, but focus reliability is something that very much impacts ones shooting experience and keeper rate.
AF performance greatly depends on the camera too. I think he only has an A7Rii and none of the latest Riv or A1 so I think it's fair to not test it.
Great test !!
Sigmas 24-70 is the clear winner !
How ballsy for Sigma to omit a couple weather sealing gaskets and fluorine coating on the 28-70 with that retail price! Probably to up sell their 24-70. I’d take the Tamron over the 28-70.
Thank u so much... This is very informative.
If not for the busy bokeh, I'd go with the Tamron (I have the 17-70 for my a6xxx series camera). As it stands, I'm undecided. I'll have to view more Tamron images to see if the bokeh is decent enough or not.
Christopher, I would like to see a comparison between the Sony and Sigma 24-70mm
F/2.8
Check out gerald undone's comparison..sigma 24-70 is the best value even though GM is slightly better
Exactly the video I was looking for Chris. Thanks. Are you planning on doing a Sony Vs Samyang 35 1.4 comparison? I bought the Samyang after watching your video and I do love it. Some of the best bokeh I've seen! I've even thought about getting their 85 because of it and selling my Sony G 85.
I would be really interessted to see how the real BUDGET option, the litte Sony 28-60 kit lens, would compare here.
It has recieved a lot of praise for its optics and still everyone complains about the price. Guess build quality sucks real bad ;)
Thank you!! Love it!
Sigma, please release your DN lenses for the Canon RF mount. Thanks!
Nice review.
Best review ever. The 28-70's close-up image quality is quite disappointing.
Thank you for this good comparison video - help me to buy the right lens :-)
CHRISTOPHER, why isn't there a lens similar to the Sigma 18-35 1.8 for Sony apsc E-MOUNT? I mean, that lens already exists, it's not impossible to do. Even with 18-24mm I would settle.
I think the Sigma 24-70mm is way too big, just like all the other older Sigma lenses designed for DSLR's.
I own - and love the - Tamron! But if the Sigma 28-70mm existed back then, that would have been a difficult choice. Maybe I would have gone with the Sigma instead!
Since I am looking for L lens, I choose Sigma 28-70mm, because I have already Panasonic 20-60mm.
I’d like to point out wrong captions for the right lens at 2:26-2:28
@christopher No problem with dust in the Sigma lenses? That’s why i bought the Tamron.
Would be interesting how the Sony 24-105 f/4 compares to those
Thank you very much for the comparison. So the bokeh of the Sigma 28-75 is somewhat better than the Sigma 24-70? This is the one thing that bothers me a little with the latter as I've heard the bokeh is subpar. There was also the concern with dust incursion but according to a Sigma rep I emailed today, they're made fixes to improve it in that regard.
I found the Sigma 28-70 to have very slightly smoother bokeh than the 24-70, but my tests were hardly exhaustive - they're both excellent in that regard
Hey Chris, when are you going to do the epic 50F1.2, head to head battle, between the RF vs Z? Throw the OTUS 55F1.4 in the mix too, if you can. It’ll hit a million views....easy! Z vs OTUS(Sony) vs RF. You’ll be the first to do this comparison between three brands. You’ll be an instant YouTub 🌟! Come on Chris, Just Do It!
And af in video? Which is better?
Thank you, this is very useful.
If you check focus breathing, then you might know the 24-70mm Art is way ahead of the tamron, have not yet used the new sigma 28-70 C, no comment on that.