You won't believe how fast this thing is!
Вставка
- Опубліковано 21 вер 2024
- This is the story behind the tiny egg-shaped Questair Venture. Beyond its mind-boggling shape and size is a plane that fulfills one mission better than any other aircraft in its category. Discover the genius behind the design and what became of this curious speedster.
Check out these other amazing planes:
Meyers 200: The Best 4-seater ever built?
• The BEST four-seater e...
Five Twin Pushers You’ve Never Heard of
• Five Twin Pushers You’...
Mooney Mite: The Tiny Mooney That Started it All
• Exotic Birds: The Moo...
Transavia Aitruk: The Genius Behind This Ugly Duckling
• The Flying Wonder from...
Big shout out to the great folks at questairventur... who assisted in sourcing lots of the great footage and detailed information. Interested in more Questair info? Contact: venturejim@icloud.com
I don't own these clips. All rights are reserved to their respective owners. Creative common videos are also utilized. If your clip is included and you'd like it removed, please email me, and we'll address the matter right away. richard@e-sense.tv
• Questair Venture - Pas...
• Questair Venture Bad I...
• Questair Venture ///7 ...
• QuestAir Venture High ...
• Cycling the landing ge...
• N94Y Questair Venture
• Rare, Fast Plane disco...
• Questair Venture Overview
• Questair Venture - PM...
• Aviation F/X Questair ...
• The Red Rocket # 1
• Passion For Flight
• Venture Steep Turns
• Venture Takeoff
• It's a flying egg!!! ...
• 300mph Egg Takeoff
• 300mph Egg Startup
• Questair Venture Part ...
• WONDERFUL WORLD OF FLY...
• Questair Venture Ballet
• Mork And Mindy TV Show...
• 1985 Piper Malibu - SOLD
• 1984 Piper Malibu - SOLD
• Questair Venture "Bad ...
• Questair Venture Takeo...
• Questair Venture
• Questair Venture - Par...
• Questair Venture Gear ...
• Questair Venture engin...
• Questair Venture N99TW...
• 1985 Piper Malibu - SOLD
• Questair Venture "Bad ...
• Questair Venture Takeo...
• Questair Venture
• Questair Venture N99TW...
• QUESTAIR VENTURE TEST ...
• Questair Venture at Tr...
• 2007 LANCAIR 360 For Sale
• Glasair III at Shelby ...
• Piper Seneca II Taking...
• Luxury Life | Billiona...
• Landing Gear Swing Bee...
• AXALP F18 HORNETS LAND...
• Questair Aircraft Fact...
• Cessna 172 Approaching...
This is a very good video and explanation, plenty of comments as well. There were three of us that founded the company, my dad, Jim (after leaving Piper) and Ed MacDonough (retired before joining) and me. We all had specialties and worked very well together. I was mostly involved in Stability and Control, IT and CAD/CAM designing and machining operations. Those of you that have flown in the Venture know of the up and away handling qualities, I'm proud of the efforts we put into getting it to fly the way it does.
I know we designed the aircraft to meet Part 23 requirements, but actual FAA certification would have been expensive. That was an eventual goal (see Cirrus) but other events got in the way.
Comments on the comments: 1) Carbon would not have been lighter, but would be more tooling intensive, 2) The ration of MAC from Wing AC to HT AC is 3 to 3.2, sweet spot for good design (mentioned in the video), 3) Tandem seating would not be faster, just skinnier and longer (gear placement, wetted area of the aircraft, ...) and you would lose the center console, 4) I could have done better on the header tank (Part 23 requirement) and fuel selector, 5) The Porsche PFM 3200 was the original (thanks Ken), but it was a weekend of relofting to fit the IO-550G, good choice for speed. The video mentioned a skinny wing, the tip was 10% T/C and the root was 17% T/C, average 13.5%, relatively thick, but the tip fooled the viewer eye.
I'm honored to have you here in the comments! And many apologies for my oversight in not including your involvement in the program, I only took knowledge once the video was nearing completion. And also thanks for providing the additional insight for the viewers here. It's a plane with a ton of misconceptions for sure!
@@aircraftadventures-vids - Thank you for making the video, no issue at all about the recognition. I have connections with a number of owners/builders and interested folks, they know who I am. I've flown in the Venture for over a hundred hours and I love the comfort and ease of flying. I'll try to respond to comments as I see them.
Doug Griswold
Things like this are the best part of youtube. If you were making a version 2.0 today are there any significant changes you'd incorporate?@@DougGriswold-w6n
@@DougGriswold-w6n Thanks for the input Doug. You know Dan and I love the Venture. I have flown over 10 different Ventures and the prototype Spirit. My
Questair Venture hours are now over 2000 and there is not a finer flying or more efficient single engine in the air that can burn 5 GPH @ 150 KTAS or 10.3 GPH at 17,000 ft truing out at 235 KTAS. My current Venture with your Dad’s name as the builder has been to over 35,000 ft. I regularly make 1000 nm trips non stop with about 250 nm reserve. My cruise climb is 160 KTS indicated and approx 1800 rpm depending on the temps. In a hurry to get thru a layer of ice just set the airspeed on 120 KTS indicated and climb at 3000 FPM. Thanks for the wonderful airplane you helped develop!
Meant to say 1800 ft per min @ 120 KTS indicated on a high performance climb to avoid ice. Also N27V carries 10 extra gallons of fuel beyond the standard 52 gallons.
I am neither a pilot nor plan I ever to become one, I am just a YT-consumer interested in all kinds of topics. And I kept watching till the end! Because the video is well done, good footage, good pace and nicely narrated. Thx!
Thanks for your kind words! I'm my own worst critic (aren't we all?) and feel there's lots of room for improvement, but I'm trying to get there with each new video.
I agree completely. Very nicely done. New subscriber here!
Thank you! Means a lot 👍@@TheJaymon1962
I totally agree with the original comment. It’s a perfect video. The friendly, conversational narration and relaxed pace made it a pleasure to listen to. The research, excellent visuals, and clear animations made it fascinating. Bravo!
Oh and nice Jedediah Avatar!
I got to fly in in one a long time ago and it was amazing! The climb attitude and climb rate were just crazy. It seemed more like a jet than a single engine piston GA aircraft like a Cessna 182. Jim Griswold the designer was mentioned a lot in the video, as the designer, but Ed MacDonough was a great engineer too. He was involved with the design of the inboard gull wing section of the F4U Corsair fighter from WWII. I remember I was with Ed looking at an F4U parked at Oshkosh and he discerned that the plane we were looking at came from a GoodYear factory and not Chance Vought, just my looking at the rivet patterns on the aircraft. That amazed me.
Wow! Thanks for that info on Ed, I didn’t really have an intel on him but it sounds like the ultimate duo if you ask me.
Yeah, and Jim Griswold's son Doug also was an engineer on the project. I think he did some work on the General Dynamics F-16.@@aircraftadventures-vids
Yes in fact he dropped a comment here today to provide some more insight! @@moremetafeta
Flew mine yesterday. From sea level to 7k in 3 minutes at 145kts indicated. Two people and just over half tanks.
@@kruck96 wowza!
I knew a wealthy cardiac surgeon who was an experienced pilot.
He loved the airplane during VFR and minimal crosswind landing conditions.
He said to me that he would never fly it in IFR conditions.
Because without a properly operating auto-pilot?
It was too unstable to hand fly an IFR approach if there were any problems at all.
I respected him for telling me that. I believe he sold the airplane soon after our conversation?
Personally, I believe there is a reason that there are no high speed common aircraft that look like this short-coupled narrow landing gear airplanes that last the test of time.
Your mileage may vary.
I personaly dont fly......
Reason being.......
The bible plainly tells us
"Lo and i am with you"
You get up there, you are on your own
Amen
At our flight school there was a guy we called " Dr Death", our theory was he had a god complex, always flew in ridiculous weather, one time he actually was scraping ice off the windscreen through the storm window on approach with his family on board, Because of him I jkind of generalized all doctors as having the same attitude & not really having time to keep up on flying.
My grandfather built one of these (Tail Number N-129). He was a retired crew chief in the Navy and Air Force serving in WWII, Korea and Vietnam. He worked on just about every piston engine and jet engine aircraft made during those eras. I flew in it numerous times and still have the VHS tapes of video I took. He modified the engine with turbos and more. I was amazed how fast the thing would climb. The Sumter County Airport was home base. Shaw AFB (F-16's) was just a few miles away. Was awesome to see those pilots looking at us zipping around. Once we did an all out speed run about 100 feet off the ground at a local airport. An FAA guy saw us, and chastised us when we landed but fortunate he gave us a pass since he had known my grandfather for decades.
Awesome experience! Thanks for sharing
Your Grandad sounds like a very cool guy!
I got to fly N62V with Rich Gritter (Questair test/demo pilot) many years ago. The airplane flew very well. He let me explore the low speed end of the envelope. Rich told me to stay off the rudder and use ailerons, which seemed a little different to me. It worked well. I had been flying a Grumman Tiger with similar steering, so the differential braking/steering was a non issue. Any "bad habits" of this plane are likely from commenters that never flew the plane. That thing was rock solid and probably a great IFR platform.
Very nice video. I fly a Questair Venture. It is incredibly efficient (flat plate drag area of only 1.46 feet^2) and has outstanding performance. It is a beautiful plane to fly. The controls are well harmonized and feel solid. Looks can be deceiving. It is quite stable in terms of both static and dynamic stability. What else would you expect from an aircraft designed by Griswold and McDonough, both professional aircraft designers. The high aspect ratio wings give it excellent performance at altitude. It handles x-winds just fine. The retractable landing gear was perhaps the most challenging part of the design. It can be finicky, but works well when properly rigged and maintained. The Venture is a thrill to fly. Makes a Bonanza feel like a Cessna 172 in comparison:-)
Uh oh, Bonanza owners will be storming in soon! Thank you Will for your support in this video and also dispelling some myths. I had a lot of fun producing this video and Jim's an outstanding guy, that helped me connect all the dots to the story also.
Thank You for informations:
Could you tell us where more are located?
Are there any in Bend, Oregon?
James--
Greetings from Ireland 🇮🇪,, a very enjoyable video, wow what an exciting little aircraft....don't like the landing gear though ,could be a handful in a cross wind 😁
@@countrichardvoncoudenhovek8855 greetings from Florida! Thanks!!!
Thanks for watching! This was a fun video to work on for sure @@countrichardvoncoudenhovek8855
The engine in those things sounds fantastic!
I went to work at Cessna as a young engineer in 2000 and had the pleasure of meeting Doug Griswold, son of Jim Griswold. Doug was also involved in the development of the prototype Venture aircraft and he let me borrow a set of plans and photo album of the prototype construction. It's kind of a funny looking aircraft on the ground but looking at the total wetted area vs. piston area you can see why it's a rocket. It's an absolutely brilliant design. I'd love to see the kit put back in production again with modern assembly techniques like the Van's aircraft series.
Cool experience, thanks for sharing! Had the honor of Doug dropping some commentary on the video yesterday.
Too bad Vans doesn't pick this plan and sell it.
@@RhaspunThey’re having their own issues.
There is a line of plastic plane models by Japanese maker Hasegawa called the Egg Series in which all kinds of famous plane types are re-modeled into, well, egg-shaped planes. Seems like the designer of this plane was a great fan of that series.
There is even an egg language. Eggywan. Yeggou adeggdegg anegg egegggegg afeggteggeregg eachegg veggoweggelegg. Uneggdeggereggseggteggoodegg?
I desperately wanted one of these back in the day...still do. The only kit plane that can do 400MPH, this was with a TSIO550 producing 350HP at 25000', this is TAS. Then the owner and engine builder died in a tragic accident and the company basically lost it's drive.
Questair was a neat bird. Interestingly, didn't know Griswold designed it and how it was designed, so thanks for that as I have some time in Malibus. But you made a mistake listing the Malibu at 3,000 pounds, that's its empty weight, no fuel, no pax. But today to get Questair performance in a great shape one has to look at the Lancair Legacy, essentially just as fast with similar power and longer range. Hard to beat a Legacy. It's issue is its construction material, but it can be built relatively quickly. I fly a very fast, totally stock V35B.
Not a mistake, I listed both out with empty weights, so orange to orange comparison.
Venture will cost half…
I worked with the designer’s brother, Mike Griswold, when The Flying Egg first came on the scene. Mike was the chief engineer of the AFTI F-16 program. The admin made cookies for each member’s birthday. Their choice as to the kind of cookie. Mike let it be known that they could have any cookie they wanted as long as it was snickerdoodles.
Even as a complete layman, this was a completely enjoyable and informative video. Heck, even I could afford to buy a ride on this plane for a weekend trip given how fuel efficient it seems to be.
Glad you enjoyed it!
I used to have a neighbor who was a fabricator and welder for the shop in Greensboro. He really respected Griswold.
What a funky looking little plane, I like it! But what struck me the most is how it almost sounds like a war bird buzzing by! So cool!
An excellent video! Thank you!! I got to fly in a Venture in 1999. On departure, we hit 160 mph prior to the end of the runway! Then, we flew 53 miles from 10,000' at the MOA above Lake Isabella, CA back to the Porterville airport (KPTV) in 7 1/2 minutes (400mph + - downhill all the way). Blew me away!
Glad you got to experience that, tx for sharing
Handy, you are aware of the 250 knot speed limit below 10,000' Maybe there is no speed limit in a MOA, but I think it would apply to non military aircraft. But I think that's a good question, time to look it up. But great fun!!
Just check, when a MOA is active, military aircraft are exempt from the speed limit below 10,000'.
@@larryweitzman5163 the rule that most GA pilots have to memorize, but never get the chance to break…. 😃
@@AC-jk8wq😂😂😂 yep!
As a Varieze owner, my next step I was thinking would be a LongEZ or a Cozy MKIV, but this could be a great contender, with a top end like that. But 13 gph makes it a bit less economical considering I currently get 4.5 gph at 145 ktas. Nonetheless, that top end is sweet and the side by side cockpit is a wife pleaser. Great vid, since I did not even know this was a thing.
Very pleased to introduce you, it's definitely not a mainstream aircraft and am very happy if more people can learn about it (whether they like the plane or not) FYI, I'm not 100% sure but I think the green Questair in the video is for sale. You can email Jim (see my description) if you want to inquire about it. I want a $5 finder's fee if that happens 😂
@@aircraftadventures-vidsHeck, you got a deal...I may even up it to $5.99, AND give you a ride; But, I would not hold my breath, either.
Time is$ abd in 3 hrs you'll be barely 430 mi but the Egg will get you 540 mi in 2 hrs, sure its a bit more fuel but itll be close.
I'll never forget seeing Tommy Rose's Venture dive in when his stabilizer folded during the 2002 Reno Air Races. He exceeded several of the manufacturer's redlines, so not the aircraft's fault. RIP.
ua-cam.com/video/4x1PDYG3ieA/v-deo.html
I was there when that happened. RIP.
It was ugly for sure.@@incargeek
Dude I was there! So sad
I was there. Crashed in front of me. Not only Rose, but as the rest of the racers were recovering , another one [Forgot his name] ground looped his Venture on landing Rwy. 8 and ended up in the weeds. I'll never forget it.
Great vid, you deserve a much wider audience!
Thank you! Working on it...
They should bring the design back in Carbon
This plane looks extremely fun to fly, awesome video!
Yes it was designed on cad cam. We had licensed the cad program from McDonald Douglas to build the Malibu and the “baby Malibu” was designed by the same team as a bit of a pet project. Griswald leaving with the plans was part of his severance package. So when the Baby Malibu got the big NO from the ever changing corporate structure at the time (I think Lear Sigler owned us then) gave the project a big NO, Griswald took his toy and left. I was really hoping he would make it as that was / is a nice plane.
That's fascinating! Thank you for providing that unique on the Venture. I had suspicions he wanted to certify the plane after all.
It was
That sir , is one badass little aircraft!👍
yes it is😂❤❤
I've flown in the two prototypes and a kit built airplane. The Venture was a great airplane but with two faults. One is that the gear and flaps were linked together. Not necessarily a problem, but the flaps were full span and included the ailerons. On landing, with the flaps down and the ailerons less effective, and the tiny wheels, when the wing was tilted, the lift vector would pull the plane off the runway. (I obviously don't remember all the details.) Second, the fuel system had (I think) header tanks, and there were circumstances in which that could lead to fuel starvation. A friend lost his due to this. As an aside, the control systems had spring to give the control feel, and those needed to be adjusted properly. On the prototypes, the plane flew like a truck, exactly what you want for an IFR, X-C plane. And the very sharp leading edge on the horizontal tail could accumulate ice easily, according to all the theories.
Don’t have flaps and the drag of the gear both have the effect to push down the nose. Should the cg not move backwards? Wheels stored in front?
Thanks for your perspective on that!
Ĺ II@@ArneChristianRosenfeldt
THAT LIL PLANE IS FREAKIN AWESOME
I saw one of those static at Falcon Field in Mesa, AZ a little over 10 years ago. I couldn't stop staring at it. It was such a cool design and ya, that gear setup made me think you'd need some fighter jet training to land it. Boy would I LOVE to fly one of those.
This thing reminds me of the Gee Bee aircraft of near 100 years ago. Small and fast.
Exactly!
The sounds are fantastic.
This will always be one of those.. "damn i should have" airplanes.. when we chose the Glasair this was one of the kits we looked t getting.. along with a lancair.. RV.. and a handful of others.. in the end, we Built a Glasair... and it was the right move.. solid, fast, sexy, nimble, and FUN..
owning a Questair and having owned a glasair, I think the composite plane with a more conventional gear system is better.
Both are incredible planes. Both perform well, and to many pilots, the Glasair / Lancair look more "conventional" and that alone probably helped boost their success.
Yeah, perhaps what made Cessna 150s and Piper Cherokees so popular in General Aviation was that you didn't have to take 10 years building them in your garage. Heck, I hate it when I have to build an office chair that I have to buy in a box.
I met and had lunch with Alan Tolle and his wife at The Spirit of San Luis restaurant back in the days right after he built his Venture. The gear was tweaky. He was a great guy.
Thanks for the video. That's crazy 5,000 hours build time for such a small aircraft. I mean it has so many pluses with the engine and cockpit. But taking up to 10 years to build had to be 10 years of frustration for pilots. If they lived that long. lol
What a special bit of kit, even with it's minor drawbacks
I remember when these were still racing at Reno. I think 3 crashed in the same year. Their tails couldn't handle the stress. They were incredibly fast.
I'm nearing 65 and not a pilot with no plans to take it up. That said if I was a young man and had seen this video I'd be encouraged to get my license and aspire to buy one of these planes that seems to offer so much fun with just the smidge of practicality (like owning a Porsche). It sounds rather safe and just in my experience in owning multiple automobiles of both the turbo and normal aspiration types, I definitely prefer the naturally aspirated engines for better longevity and less complexity to which, I assume, may bleed over into aircraft engines?
That is an amazing little plane.
That looks like a fun little plane.
A pilot who flew out of the airport I worked at had a Malibu engine come uncorked on him over Colorado in a storm, wait the fun is just beginning, he landed in the parking lot of a dynamite factory and walked away unharmed. True story!
Yikes! That could have had an explosive outcome
I don't fly very much,I am not a pilot but this looks well thought out. Nice job!
Nicely done.
This is designed just like the Gee-Bee or GB racer from the 1930's air racing days. Both R1 and R2 were hard to fly but very fast as they were built with a Bumble Bee as the base for the design concept. One was built as a replica and flying out of Creswell Oregon if memory serves. I can't remember the name of the pilot but he could make that aircraft dance in the sky. It was a real joy to see a plane going that that fast but the wings were only 2.5 inch's thick and very short. But this looks very similar in it's proportions to the GB.
Fantastic Mini Documentary! This video made me smile. Thank you for making this! Great airplane. That plane reminded me of my little Mazda Miata. (at least in spirit)
Glad you enjoyed it! Miata with 500hp would be a good comparison, lol
Oh cool another plane to add to the list of planes I desperately want.
Likewise!
Should be built again in the current market it would be very competitive.
My thoughts exactly. No piston powered aircraft on the market today can touch it except perhaps the Thunder Mustang.
@@handy335and Darkaero 1.
It takes about 6,000 hours to build one. If you count factory parts production and builder final assembly.
Experimental aircraft are built for two reasons. Cost, and performance. But rarely performance at any cost. Therefore, the market for these types is in the double digits at best.
The Vans RV series set the standard for build time, so unless a quick-build is offered which substantially cuts down build time, it's going to be hard to compete.
You lost me when you went into the history lesson. I was wondering how fast the plane was that’s all.
Such a well done video. Good job, thank you.
Glad you enjoyed it!
Actually it's Gorgeous
I WANT ONE ---WOW what a great bird -- I'm in LUV
Wow cool! we had GDJF taxi by a few weeks ago and it turned a few heads lol. Neat to see a video pop up in my feed about it!
They sure will turn heads!
Love to see it with a 400hp Allison 250!
So super intrigued by this one
i'm still intrigued! (even after having sat in one)
TY! Becoming a pilot has always been a dream of mine, yet life has gotten in the way! Anyway, in 2012, I had a head-scratching experience, which wasn't solved until 2021. What I saw, I knew dam well that I saw it. Yet, even I thought I was crazy, and didn't actually see it. Until, in 2021, home-bound by Coof-protocol, I Googled the kit-planes, and there was what I saw in 2012. Not your Venture, but similiar. Obviously, I'm just a poor country bumpkin!! But, I would still love to fly one of those rascals!!😊
Very nice. I have built many engines for the Lancair V and would have loved to have built a nice balanced high compression IO-550 for these little racers.
Since you mentioned Reno, Tommy Rose was killed when the horizontal stabilizer failed under load and down fractured, resulting in him crashing on the home straight. No more ventures were allowed to race at Reno
This just LOOKS fast.
Terrific video and quality content.
Merry Christmas
🌏🌲
Thank you! Merry Christmas to you 👍
That thing sounds like a P-51 flying past.
It does, vaguely.
Good Video! It's A Shame To See It Just Become A Part Of Aviation History When It Should Still Be In The Present. Thank You.
Awesome
I love this aircraft, thank you for share the best content. I'd like more the Glasair 3 and Lancair IV-P
Anyone remembers this? : "Looks like Egg, Flies like Rocket: Egg Rocket, Egg Rocket". 😂
I think Mike Patey built one of these and set some records before building his Lancair.
Great informative video, very well done.
Sounds like Mike alright! And thanks for the kind words.
Good article. Wish I were younger.
Don't we all
What a short coupled little speed demon!
Would love to see Mikey Patey get ahold of one of these and mod it like he does everything
I used to see these in the Aerotrader for sale all the time in the late 90s.
Looks like a fun plane.
Love your little avatar of the pilot from "Mad Max." He flew a different kind of egg.
Gyro captain. One of my favorite characters of all movies. Up to no good but had a good heart.
Very cool interesting story.
Pretty cool video, very informative
Thanks, appreciate it!
Looks like a blast to fly, I hope it makes a come back, someone should start producing them again, just re-engineer the landing gear!
I hope so too!
It's so cute! It looks like a chibi plane out of some anime...or something...I love it.
It does!
Hey, a suppository with wings. Nice paint job too.
I've always said that about the new Goodyear blimp.
If it's slower than a p-51 mustang, its slow. Thats my rule of thumb.
Sounds strange, but in some ways, it reminds me in looks and the ideas of the Bell XP-77
Not strange at all. To me, it reminds me of the McDonnell Goblin
Cute I wish I had one
5:36 that voice in the background scared the heck out of me. sounded like somebody standing behind me at my desk
Lol, I didn't even realize that voice was in there till I cranked up the volume way loud! That was the owner Jim offering some history on the plane, and I forgot to edit it out.
Ha ha. You thought your boss had caught you not working.😂😅😂😅😂
What a Hot Rod! Interesting design and an application of the "What if we made a Malibu shorter?"... It looks like it could be an unstable design, but the designers KNEW what they were doing with this one, as most of the people who have been up in this plane said the controls feel really nice.... A big 520 cid engine in this little plane!!! I'm wondering what the glide ratio is...
Glide ratio with gear and flaps up is a little over 15:1. The standard engine is an IO-550G 280 hp @ 2500. Several Ventures have the IO-550N which is 310 hp @ 2700 rpm. Or just turn up the G model to 2700 rpm and you have the same thing.
@@jc11250f45 Wow, not a bad glide ratio for a 300 mph plane! Gotcha on that engine size and induction system / cylinder layout...
Well put together vid. Informative. Thanks!
Glad you liked it!
Looks like a blast.
Infinitely cheaper? I didn't get one. Where can I pick it up? Free fuel too? Sign me up!!
The Egg! I was seriously considering this machine but my common sense won over adventurous me. The Mirage/Malibu on the other hand is an incredible and highly under appreciated airplane. Someone somewhere needs to put a small TP on the egg!
I think there is one with a turbocharger (if you meant turboprop, it would probably have tiny range)
I worked for a “builder assistance center” for a while, building Ventures. Never got to fly one though.
Were you in Greensboro?
@@dieselscience No, Hahn’s facility in FL. Didn’t last, personality conflicts…
Hey, thanks for a well put together and informative video! I learned stuff!
My pleasure! And I do too!
They look so clean and just right! Thanks for the video, really!
I believe how fast it is. I clocked some left seat time. A very fine aircraft.
That plane came on the kit plane market in the same era as Lancair and some others came with their fast buit kits that knocked down 1000's of hours wth composite molded frame ready to work on, I remember it very well 30 years ago, couldn't afford one and was looking for a more traditionnal Rand Robinson KR-2 with a VW beetle engine
Great video well researched and thought out.
Much appreciated!
Always liked this bird nice design cant deny that😊
Same here!
Amazing pocket rocket!!!
I saw one ground loop at Reno, after one shed a wing! In the same race.
A beautiful egg 😅😊
It's very clever, but swept tails bother me.
Thanks for a fascinating video.
Fast enough at Reno Air Races for the horizontal stabilizer to fold up and nose dive into the ground in about .5 seconds making a smoking hole!!
Structural failures happen to many homebuilts, not necessarily a fault of the original design. Also Reno they pushed harder than originally designed for.
The Ventures were pushing 360+ mph at 5,200'MSL at Reno. That is absurdly fast and ill-advised.
Well, someone didn't get the Memo!@@TheJustinJ
Seeing all of the design additions used to strengthen Mike Patey’s Turbulence….
Exceeding design speeds requires some pretty high engineering and build talent…. And piloting skill as well. 😃
And then you have a plane that isn’t like any other out there…. Very few at least.
Racing at Reno… tough place to be for both the pilots and machines… extreme high g compared to the ordinary general aviation world…
Modern streamlined version of the ......"Gee Bee Racer."
The Venture project ended when Henry Booley and Questair's owner were on a trip and suffered and engine failure at 12,500 feet, in VFR conditions, right over the Des Moines, IA airport. From 12,500 MSL and right over the field they could not make it in and both perished in the crash landing. The Venture was really fast, in part because the wing loading was so high, but that makes it unsafe during a dead stick landing-- as Booley and the company owner demonstrated. Efforts to sell the company went no where and that was the end of it.
Looked into one years back. Investigated putting a PT-6 on it. Passed on the project, though it still tickles my fancy ... ^v^
Yikes, that would have been absolutely bonkers!! Maybe best you didn't lol
@@aircraftadventures-vids Copy that ... would have been a hoot, though! I intended to make an aircraft like Mike Patey's 'Turbulence' ... and like Mike's, the redesign required to make the Venture handle the PT-6 was just too extensive. So, I went with a clean sheet of paper, tandem design instead. Still, the Swearingen SX-300 and this later, simpler Venture were good efforts. The military was interested in the Turboprop version of the SX-300, but during a demo flight for the military, the prototype shed its wings ... game over. ^v^
It sounds like a Warbird on those high speed flyby's...✈
It does a bit.
It had a great engine that sounded like a 1945 military fighter.
4:18 min "...drop the landing gear and watch it come down at 3000 ft like an anvil." 😄
Lots of the story about the Venture is missing in this video. It was produced at one point in Connecticut with a turbo charged PMA engine. You can see one photo in the video with the red and silver 62V having a PMA sticker right behind to air vents for the turbo chargers. The owners of the engine and the owner of the airframe company where both killed in 4Q back in 1995. If this tragic event never happend we might have seen more production of this aircraft.
Lots? Well there's very little to go off of from Google, and certainly nothing on the PFM engine choice (which I found out here in the comments). Even then, several Questair owners filled me in with some more info before the video. I'll definitely consult with you before my next aviation video, lol.
I had one of those PMA engine and one cylinder broke in half on t-o. There was a note on the engine saying 330 HP but my TAS was the same 240 kts compare to my stock IO-550-G. The accident: they were high over an airport when the engine quit. Also they were at 2500 lbs and the normal gross is 2000 lbs.