Even if there were heard, you have 30 mins to go to a bunker and try to survive the fires, radiation, poor air quality, and the nuclear winter for months. Just make sure you have enough supplies.
@@Dailyshorts4x0 countries that aren't directly targeted will still feel the consequences, nuclear winter, unfertile lands, famine, polluted water etc. there won't be a world worth to live in left
@@ecleveland1 Russia won't use nukes, they are bluffing and posturing with this ICBM Launch nonsense . . . If they do choose to be stupid enough then all their established politic and ruling elite will be vaporized immediately by UK, USA and NATO . . . they may have capability and long range nuclear missiles but they are strategically outgunned and outmatched by the aforementioned Powers and they know it, any kind of action against UK or The USA will only prove futile, it's not a game they could ever win because once they initiate anything their own entire destruction is mutually assured. 🎯👊💯
Einstein said something similar, something like: "I don't know with what weapons WWII will be fought with but I know the next one will be with sticks and stones.
You don't fight a nuclear war - you simply perish either from the initial strike or months later. Too many people locked into PC game mode and divorced from reality.
@@anabelandralph5418 I too thought that nuclear winter was a myth after all. It isn't. The immense majority of people would die from hunger long before agriculture became possible again.
@mariadamedecoeur It's not a "hoax" by any measure - the scientists working on it do so earnestly and do so within the bounds of real science. So we can at least use the right terminology for it. It is a hypothesis, and there have been teams of competent scientists doing real, peer-reviewed work on it since the early 1980s. Is it a valid one or an invalid one? The resolution comes down to what model are you using for the injecting of smoke and soot into the atmosphere after a large nuclear attack, how long that will stay in the air after the attack, and how they will interact with sunlight. The competing models use different estimates for the various values. With some estimates, there is smoke, but it gets "scrubbed" out of the atmosphere through different mechanisms (like rain) over a short amount of time, and so any climate effect is small and temporary if even perceivable. With others, the smoke/soot get up there and stay up there and reflect a lot of sun and cause fairly wide-spread temperature decreases that can take years or decades to return to the status quo. Which of these is correct? I don't know. I have met people who work on this and they all seem intellectually genuine to me. I also think that most of the people who work on this (one side or the other) tend to be inclined towards one of these solutions being the right answer before they start the work, and their assumptions of optimism or pessimism in the numbers reflect that. But as far as I can tell we don't have perfect simulations and we don't have perfect understanding of the relevant phenomena, because (fortunately) this sort of thing has not happened before. We do have some data we can feed into it (the combined bombings of WWII - about 4 Mt of explosives spread out over a huge area and several years - did seem to create a small temperature dip globally; the torching of the Kuwaiti oil fields in the 1990s did not seem to have a measurable impact globally), and those can help refine the models. But it's all models. And you're modeling two difficult things. One is the climate, which we're getting better at, but is still hugely difficult the model. The other is a large-scale nuclear exchange, which requires a lot of assumptions since we don't have a lot of source data for that (thankfully). "How much burning of modern cities would be caused by modern weapons?" is a question that is very hard to answer - you're modeling a lot of effects that we don't have good experimental data for (because, again, we haven't nuked modern cities with modern weapons). If you want a better understanding of the whole thing, Lawrence Badash's book A Nuclear Winter's Tale, does a very good job of outlining the early history of the work, the various responses to it, and the modern updates to it. Badash is on the side of it being a real phenomena, or at least a phenomena that if it has even a small chance of being real, you should assume is real (because to do otherwise is reckless). But he gives those who object to it their day in court as well. It is written for a non-technical person. It will not resolve the question for you, but it'll help you see the various reasons that different people argue differently about it. I'm not saying that everybody's opinion is equally valid - but for a non-expert it is not going to be possible to really determine which of these models is inherently better at the moment. The number of unknowns are significant.
Its more like World ending binge....apparently everyone forgot how powerful nuclear weapons are....the millennial and gen z have no clue, they think it's something that is winnable they don't understand they would be dead in 30 minutes after a all out strike....he'll, even if one major city was nuked it would be chaos and anarchy...
Im studying and watching everything that’s going on across the pond. I hope Biden doesn’t have enough time to push it beyond the point of no return, so that trump can cool things down. Peace is what we need, 20 years of war we just did takes a toll on everyone even if you don’t notice. The world needs a break from all these wars and all these bozos fighting about land they lost 500000000 years ago as if they don’t have one of the largest countries in the world already
I'm 70 and I used to envy young people for having a much longer life ahead than me, but now with the risk of nuclear war higher than ever, I have the opposite feeling that young people should envy old people like me who lived in the best of times.
Incredibly informative! This video breaks down the complexities of nuclear strategy in a way that’s easy to understand. A must-watch for anyone interested in military defense!
You still fight even if you lose. In most knife fights, you both lose in the end. The loser dies in the street, and if the loser did their job the winner dies in hospital.
@@easterlinear No one would win a strategic nuclear exchange. Everything would be destroyed. We are talking about thousands of nuclear weapons being detonated.
@@curtisevans8413 The best option is not to fight at all. What are they fighting for if both fighters and their respective populations will be decimated eventually. There will be no future left for anyone in civilization. What use is military force when all means of production and supply chains are destroyed? Hiding in bunkers and radiation shelters can prevent immediate death, but no guarantee for painless natural death.
We are In Colorado. I’m actually glad to be in this state. It’s pretty clear we would be annihilated quickly which is fine with me. I’m actually relieved about this. I don’t want my family and I to suffer by surviving the blasts.
Who would want to live in a bunker at some point they would have to come out. I’m afraid it would be pointless as the nuke winter would last for years and years best not send nukes.
government bunker locations are well documented worldwide. Every country has them targeted with overkill. multiple warheads on that target. they are hardened for penetrating the earth and destroying the bunker and its contents.
Every sentient species goes through what we are now, someone will discover fission, and either they bombard themselves to the stone age, come back to modern times, do it again, or hopefully have history books.
@MrHav1k His point is valid. Almost like "growing pains". Unless they had planet with no predators and everyone singing Kumaya around a fire, they've killed eachother or other species before.
@@ragnoxis05 Many ordinary people are brainwashed into being a Virgin Mary, just like the small countries around Athens during the Athenian period, believing in fairness, justice, equality, social harmony, and prosperity in Athens. Your attitude towards aliens is like this worship of converts
@PK-pp3lu That is true. That is why some scientists like Francis Drake have suggested we met no aliens because the rate at which civilizations develop communicating and spaceflight technology equals the rate at which they pass away.
On the assumption their bunker is incredibly strong and hermetically sealed, and that they have enough oxygen, food, and water supply. That said US nuclear war head are bunker piercing Kearn ng their lesson from Iraq. So simply put, nuclear is inescapable for all, and is just a matter of who gets burn out first. 😊
When I was young, I had plans to survive the nuclear winter. I lived under the threat in the 80s - even took a class on nuclear strategy. But nowadays, I just hope I’m in the fireball.
I work down the road from a RR factory that builds the Royal Navies Submarine reactors. It’s a comfort to know when nukes hit I will be spared the horror that comes after.
Totally, looking at the NUKEMAP, my house would be gone in the initial blast given my proximity to one of our major airforce bases in the southwest USA - easily a top target. I couldn't see anyone passing that one up.
@@Haunuva exactly I’ve lived a decent life it would be horrible if it ended due to radiation sickness or starvation or dehydration. A quick bright light and it’s over.
The complete scenario discussed here is described and played out in full in Stanley Alexander's book Darkest Days. It's a far worse nightmare than anyone can imagine.
When I was a kid in suburban New York, in elementary school, we had 'duck and cover' drills meant to survive a nuclear attack from the Soviet Union. But they were eventually stopped because survival really wasn't credible, especially living so close to a major target. We knew, as children, that it would only take thirty minutes for an ICBM to reach us from the USSR. The common joke was, "In case of nuclear attack, put your head between your knees, and kiss your ass goodbye."
and realize they WONT be returning to earth because they need all that help from below to get them back. they will freeze after their fuel runs out, and or starve after their food and water run out.
I'm British and i was in the RAF. On our crew room wall we had a map of every russian target in the UK. It was leaked information and accurate. Every city and town was targeted as was every airport, civilian and military, every port, civilian and military and every power staion including nuclear power stations, railway yards, military bases and bridges. The total number of warheads was 280. 280 nuclear warheads on a small nation! Every major city had 4 designated nukes aimed at it! Now repeat this for the USA! Not many in the northern hemisphere would survive.
Very grim. Political leaders, royals and infrastructures will then be gone. What remain will be nuclear contaminated land and water. UK will be without civilisation as from that point. Sad.
The world will never be the same. You don't even want to think of a nuclear war. And good luck trying to survive. through a nuclear war. Everything on Earth would be ruined
I always told my wife if all out nuclear broke out we are better off being vaporized quickly by the nuclear explosions because if we survive that we will die slowly of radiation sickness, starvation or nuclear winter or all!
@@ThomasMckenzie-mo6qn further more if so called leaders of Russia n North Korea think they are safe in a hardened bunker somewhere? Maybe for a while but eventually they must come up and what they find is irradiated wasteland above
@terrondt Please believe in Jesus Christ and call upon his name, then you will be saved from this catastrophic war..🙏🏻 That day is a day of wrath, a day of trouble and distress, a day of wasteness and desolation, a day of darkness and gloominess, a day of clouds and thick darkness, A day of the trumpet and alarm against the fenced cities, and against the high towers. And I will bring distress upon men, that they shall walk like blind men, because they have sinned against the LORD: and their blood shall be poured out as dust, and their flesh as the dung. (Zephaniah-1:15-17) Gather yourselves together, yea, gather together, O nation not desired; Before the decree bring forth, before the day pass as the chaff, before the fierce anger of the LORD come upon you, before the day of the LORD's anger come upon you. Seek ye the LORD, all ye meek of the earth, which have wrought his judgment; seek righteousness, seek meekness: it may be ye shall be hid in the day of the LORD's anger. (Zephaniah-2:1-3)
All those rich people can hide in their underground prisons and think they will inherit the Earth after most everybody dies.They are only preventing their death for a short time and won't want to live in what's left.
wrong. nothing on earth would be ruined outside the areas nuked. elon musk already dispeled that notion. you would have to drop millions of nukes to seriously damage earth. russians tested their nukes pretty close to their own cities and even used strongest nuke ever produced, tsar bomb - nothing seriously bad happened to their cities or finland which was relatively close. the damage of a nuke is very much contained within the blast radius
You guys are all scared, there are hundreds of thousands of port city's and maybe 12,000 nukes. I think way less than that are functionally, and to destroy a port like San Diego it would take 6-10 nukes
@@space1commander they did. Humans from the dawn of time took what they needed or wanted from other weaker humans. No different then any animal species
In a documentary about the Vulcan bomber a former pilot made the chilling statement namely that if they had ever been scrambled for real, by the time they'd got over Norway there would have been no UK left to return to & that was in the 60,s! The recent re-showing of the TV series Threads was pretty scary & sobering too!
He will be asleep or on the beach. The VP will start giving the order with "I grew up in a middle class...", and by the time she is finished US will look like a Falllout game. That's the sad situation dems have put the country in. So hopefully they'll just jump straight to the house speaker for orders.
"MIRVS" can be used two ways: Detaching and hitting multiple targets, or kept together to make a "Tsar Bomba" (Russia) or "Sasquatch" (U.S.) 50+ Megatons either way
Exactly. There would never be "just one warhead launched" anywhere, by anyone. Everyone's ICBMs and SLBMs have multiple warheads each (even if each missile has 3-4 warheads with a couple hundred kilotons yield per each, which they may or may not be reduced to nowadays with arms reduction treaties and agreements, it's surely sobering and scary enough to think about). Realistically any launch in anger from a country and the following retaliatory launch(es) from the other country or countries once the first missile is detected in the sky (most likely would be multiple countries launching their missiles because of agreements and treaties and pacts for allies to help each other in the event of an attack) would be an exchange of a WHOLE LOT of missiles sent from each side, that is to give the greatest chance of a higher number of warheads actually reaching their intended targets to achieve maximum effect, because some of them would possibly either fail or likely be intercepted by different weapon systems and taken out before reaching their target. No matter what, the whole idea of this is seriously scary and a very dismal thing to think about ever happening to humanity in our lifetimes. Nobody actually wins. One thing that truly scares me is nuclear war, plain and simple.
@@joshy_b_823 Its MAD (Mutually Assured Destruction). Thats probably what prevented it from happening in the cold war. The scary bit is that the limited use of battle field nuclear weapons in support of a conventional war seems to be acceptable. Countries seem to have forgot that this still risks being mad.
We don't want war!!. I like eat steak drink beers, nice cars, nice house, swimming pool, beautiful beach and heaps of girl friends 😅😅❤❤😅😅❤❤. Why can't we enjoy life
I have watched numerous documentaries from Trinity and beyond you name it. I have to say this was very well put together, excellent job and sad but true.
Ai Narrator, nice job. On a side note I vividly remember doing nuclear drills at my primary school in the 80s in the UK, during a nuclear explosion they taught us to go under our desks, or make youselves as small as possible, in other words lay down face first on the ground, or hide behind a slope to give youself a better survival chance from the blast shockwave. So when they say give youself a better survival chance, the odds are still stacked against you surviving from the initial shockwave, it makes you realise survival isn't really an option. Scary thought as a 8 year old kid back then. 🙄
Everyone is standing knee-deep in gasoline and waving matches at each other, the only difference is that some have 2-3 matches and others have a whole box of matches, but the end result is the same for everyone.
"Sir, an enemy is launching an ICBM against our country, what is your order." President Trump: "It don't matter, we have the big bombs, we got the best bombs, our bombs have the best looks and the best technolo...." *boom*
When there is a nuclear strike against the United States, the most devastating places to hit are the volcanic calderas which have rising magma pockets ready to blow. The caldera at Yellowstone, for example, sits on the continental divide and has access to the network of fault lines beneath the earth. This network would cause such devastation that there will be millions who will die without anyone firing another shot. Military bases would be in severe risk due to the loss of the skies. All flights would be canceled due to the amount of volcanic dust in the air as a hazard to aircraft engines. Then, earthquakes would take infinitely more lives while the air is filled with volcanic ash and nuclear winter. The catch is...the depths of the volcanic eruptions will cause a chain reaction of earthquakes will also start many of which will be reverberating back and forth. The ability to intercept incoming nuclear ICBMs would have a difficult time due to the resulting affect of EMPs while natural disasters are taking place from earthquakes. The fault lines in the oceans surrounding the United States causing tsunamis like the which this world has never known. With such continuous effects, much of the US nuclear arsenal will be out of commission or completely destroyed. Now, recalibrate your worst case scenarios based on this strategic devastation happening. So, where did I hear about his plan? A Russian general suggested it on American television networks a couple of decades ago and I have never forgotten it.
My theory is that nuclear apocalypse "happens" all the time, we just keep collapsing into the weirder and weirder timeline where it doesn't happen, because a universe without observers would not exist
That's an interesting theory: My initial theory is that this world has gone through multiple nuclear apocalypse's, hence why we don't fully understand ancient civilizations. As a way to keep the population from growing too rapidly to prevent overuse of limited resources. I understand that modern science debunks this, but in the state of the world, is modern science becoming a propaganda piece to prevent others from thinking this?
The universe definitely would exist.There just would be no one to record its existence.Dont kid yourself This Universe and the others ones were here before and will be there after if humanity were to end or no consciousness existed intelligent enough to record the universes existence
No reason to be concerned. Because if it was to happen there's nothing we can do about it. We people are the population of the world we have no say. That's the sad thing
@@ThomasMckenzie-mo6qn That what they said about invading Ukraine... "He fears Nato he wants to live he will not invade" over 5 years he warned about invading Ukraine if Nato expanded... They said he was bluffing until 2022 February.. Now let's continue saying he's bluffing again... We'll see how that end
This morning, the first ever live-fire launch of an intercontinental ballistic missile at the city of Dnipro took place! Congratulations, friends, we are very close to the end of history
My advice to all, is do what I've done. Purchase some land way out in a rural area, dig yourself a water well, go off the grid, put in a bomb shelter, grow a vegetable garden, raise chickens, purchase as many RME as you can find, buy a diesel & solar generator and pray!
the problem is in a month your crops would be dead. with in 6 months the planet would decrease to -10 degrees. Unless your garden is underground using thermal power you will be dead in about a year. The bunker would also face many problems where would you get fresh air. The answer is no where. Its all radiated
@@danhall2197 Very True , But first and foremost nobody ask to be on earth and live / die . So I don’t know what everyone is to expect . Death is an experience within itself and so is life obviously .
How can we do this? I mean how as animals of reason and compassion can we inflict such harm on all life on our planet? To what end? I am watching 2 doves snuggle with each other out my kitchen window. Earlier today a deer and her 2 babies walked down the street together. I live near the Rocky Mts. I am watching humans ruin entire habitats and every life form. We are insane creatures of habit, greed, and sloth, who don't care about anything but ourselves.
just to let you know....movies like the matrix....terminator...i robot.....etc....guess what? the humans were the bad guys/villians...when you look deep into it..
You ever think its not just something unique to humans to build such vast weapons of eradication and death? What if it is just the nature/theme of this universe? Imagine we find proof of advanced alien civilizations and they too have weapons of destruction?
We have more than what's public knowledge , I joined the US Army in 2005 was a 12N " combat engineer " and we had to build new bunkers underground for em. And that's when I was told n shown we have many extras we have way more than 5,500
This means that you have been deceiving the whole world for decades that you have 5550 nuclear warheads, while you may have 30000 warheads, this means that you have always been cheaters in everything! but it won't even save America! it will disappear in a nuclear war as if it never existed together with the entire science and everything it owns! better said, the entire northern continent will disappear as if it never existed!
Putin is a criminal and stupid, but his generals have no desire to see their wives and children incinerated. This war is not existential for Russia and it has no need to resort to suicide. Putin on the other hand is unlikely to survive this misadventure of his own creation.
@CSIG1001maybe not that many but, in the case of all out nuclear war, even though not every country will be hit; nuclear winter will cripple the rest of the world, sunlight blocked, temperature down, black rain, millions of crops and animals will die in due time, leading to atleast a billion deaths, in my opinion. if it does happen, we will see who is right in these comments. hope that day never comes.. can agree on that i believe
@@blackyboi2885 I think it'll be closer to a few hundred millions in the first day of nuclear war. Around 5 billion will die from famines, disease, and complete lack of infrastructure, on top of the radiation.
Anyone wanna have fun thought process watch something called threads in bbc. Having went through covid and seeing how quickly rationing happens from supermarket panic buying while logistics were working I’d hate to be a civilian living through a nuclear attack. I’m all the way out in the countryside so while I’ll may survive living afterwards without supermarkets and the ability to buy foods is scary.
![Lp. Сердце Вселенной #60 РОЖДЕНИЕ ЛОЛОЛОШКИ [Финал] • Майнкрафт](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/YoR0pAV9FVQ/mqdefault.jpg)
Fight, they will be no fighting, just a lot of innocent people dying, while the culprits sit in their bunkers.
The aliens will prevent it
@@squirrelsinjacket1804 I wish they were true
@@squirrelsinjacket1804может наоборот ..
@@wulfrache I think only the Swiss have enough bunkers
@@wulfrache lmfao yea
Ronald Reagan : *"A Nuclear War cannot be won and should never be fought"*
Smart player is who never play it
@@Amen6magi Smart players want to forcefully play
"A strange game. The only winning move is not to play."
- "Joshua" from "War Games."
@@Joshua-qx5mm i luv Ronnie Raygun.
@@Amen6magi bot
I hope during any generation those sirens are never heard. Imagine waking up at 3 A.M by those lovely sirens.
don't bother stay in bed and hold your loved ones
Even if there were heard, you have 30 mins to go to a bunker and try to survive the fires, radiation, poor air quality, and the nuclear winter for months. Just make sure you have enough supplies.
@@reubenz1480 survive for what? the world will be destroyed..
@@donkey9113half of the world
@@Dailyshorts4x0 countries that aren't directly targeted will still feel the consequences, nuclear winter, unfertile lands, famine, polluted water etc.
there won't be a world worth to live in left
A strange game. The only winning move is not to play.
Another wise move: don't antagonize a nation with most number of nuclear arsenal.. when he's pushed against the wall, he will strike!
Great movie and ending! #wargames
at least thats the point
How about a game of chess instead?
Greetings professor Falken
Why go to Mars when you can bring it here
Last button push before it would be over, so be the first to push all the buttons ?
Fastest way to get to Mars
hahaha great comment
@@jimmyjimmy-k5c I second that lol
i'm dead
"They won't fear it until they understand it. And they won't understand it until they've used it"
. . . and they won't understand it for long if they do use it . . .
Many people have to experience pain and suffering from real horror before they realize what a terrible mistake they made.
@@ecleveland1 Russia won't use nukes, they are bluffing and posturing with this ICBM Launch nonsense . . . If they do choose to be stupid enough then all their established politic and ruling elite will be vaporized immediately by UK, USA and NATO . . . they may have capability and long range nuclear missiles but they are strategically outgunned and outmatched by the aforementioned Powers and they know it, any kind of action against UK or The USA will only prove futile, it's not a game they could ever win because once they initiate anything their own entire destruction is mutually assured. 🎯👊💯
They can't give lives,they can't give love...they choose to destroy the world...the end is near...
Those who started it will be saved while the billions on the innocent will perish.
Someone once said, under a nuclear war exchange the survivors will envy the dead
Einstein said something similar, something like: "I don't know with what weapons WWII will be fought with but I know the next one will be with sticks and stones.
@@dalycooley-ef4inThat implied WW2 was going to be the end of the world. Not WW3 because by then we would have nothing to fight with
@@eligreg99 No it didn't imply WW2 was going to be the end of the world. Stop spewing nonsense. Get off the drugs.
That's exactly correct..
yep. That was Nikita Khrushchev. And he was right.
You don't fight a nuclear war - you simply perish either from the initial strike or months later. Too many people locked into PC game mode and divorced from reality.
That's actually a myth I used to think the same thing.
@@anabelandralph5418how can you proof that?
@@anabelandralph5418 well explain the context of the myth
@@anabelandralph5418 I too thought that nuclear winter was a myth after all. It isn't. The immense majority of people would die from hunger long before agriculture became possible again.
@mariadamedecoeur It's not a "hoax" by any measure - the scientists working on it do so earnestly and do so within the bounds of real science. So we can at least use the right terminology for it. It is a hypothesis, and there have been teams of competent scientists doing real, peer-reviewed work on it since the early 1980s. Is it a valid one or an invalid one?
The resolution comes down to what model are you using for the injecting of smoke and soot into the atmosphere after a large nuclear attack, how long that will stay in the air after the attack, and how they will interact with sunlight. The competing models use different estimates for the various values. With some estimates, there is smoke, but it gets "scrubbed" out of the atmosphere through different mechanisms (like rain) over a short amount of time, and so any climate effect is small and temporary if even perceivable. With others, the smoke/soot get up there and stay up there and reflect a lot of sun and cause fairly wide-spread temperature decreases that can take years or decades to return to the status quo.
Which of these is correct? I don't know. I have met people who work on this and they all seem intellectually genuine to me. I also think that most of the people who work on this (one side or the other) tend to be inclined towards one of these solutions being the right answer before they start the work, and their assumptions of optimism or pessimism in the numbers reflect that. But as far as I can tell we don't have perfect simulations and we don't have perfect understanding of the relevant phenomena, because (fortunately) this sort of thing has not happened before. We do have some data we can feed into it (the combined bombings of WWII - about 4 Mt of explosives spread out over a huge area and several years - did seem to create a small temperature dip globally; the torching of the Kuwaiti oil fields in the 1990s did not seem to have a measurable impact globally), and those can help refine the models.
But it's all models. And you're modeling two difficult things. One is the climate, which we're getting better at, but is still hugely difficult the model. The other is a large-scale nuclear exchange, which requires a lot of assumptions since we don't have a lot of source data for that (thankfully). "How much burning of modern cities would be caused by modern weapons?" is a question that is very hard to answer - you're modeling a lot of effects that we don't have good experimental data for (because, again, we haven't nuked modern cities with modern weapons).
If you want a better understanding of the whole thing, Lawrence Badash's book A Nuclear Winter's Tale, does a very good job of outlining the early history of the work, the various responses to it, and the modern updates to it. Badash is on the side of it being a real phenomena, or at least a phenomena that if it has even a small chance of being real, you should assume is real (because to do otherwise is reckless). But he gives those who object to it their day in court as well. It is written for a non-technical person. It will not resolve the question for you, but it'll help you see the various reasons that different people argue differently about it.
I'm not saying that everybody's opinion is equally valid - but for a non-expert it is not going to be possible to really determine which of these models is inherently better at the moment. The number of unknowns are significant.
Who else is on a war-studying binge?
👍🏻
Yurppp
Its more like World ending binge....apparently everyone forgot how powerful nuclear weapons are....the millennial and gen z have no clue, they think it's something that is winnable they don't understand they would be dead in 30 minutes after a all out strike....he'll, even if one major city was nuked it would be chaos and anarchy...
Im studying and watching everything that’s going on across the pond. I hope Biden doesn’t have enough time to push it beyond the point of no return, so that trump can cool things down. Peace is what we need, 20 years of war we just did takes a toll on everyone even if you don’t notice. The world needs a break from all these wars and all these bozos fighting about land they lost 500000000 years ago as if they don’t have one of the largest countries in the world already
🍻🍻
I'm 70 and I used to envy young people for having a much longer life ahead than me, but now with the risk of nuclear war higher than ever, I have the opposite feeling that young people should envy old people like me who lived in the best of times.
im 37 and I approve this message.
The righteous begin their good life after death. Happy you had a good life see you in the after.
Completely concur now with this comment. Thank God you have had the fortune to live your best years sir
Very well put.us old folks did enjoy the best of times...69 years of it here and today's young people could get wiped out at any time if war hits.
Well said granpa.
Flower generation.
Props to the amazing graphics team on this video... Great visual and production value.
This should be the top comment!
Incredibly informative! This video breaks down the complexities of nuclear strategy in a way that’s easy to understand. A must-watch for anyone interested in military defense!
There is no such thing as "fighting" a nuclear war, there is only losing one.
You still fight even if you lose. In most knife fights, you both lose in the end. The loser dies in the street, and if the loser did their job the winner dies in hospital.
Except for the one who wins
@@easterlinear No one would win a strategic nuclear exchange. Everything would be destroyed. We are talking about thousands of nuclear weapons being detonated.
Correct. You loose as firing one will mean suicide for anyone. Its a loss for both parties.
@@curtisevans8413 The best option is not to fight at all. What are they fighting for if both fighters and their respective populations will be decimated eventually. There will be no future left for anyone in civilization.
What use is military force when all means of production and supply chains are destroyed? Hiding in bunkers and radiation shelters can prevent immediate death, but no guarantee for painless natural death.
We haven't come very far as humans, still fighting wars and killing each other.
Blame the eastern autocracy and dictator led world and there aggression and oppression
@@LiamTate-b1v dude white people steal america from local indian people,and they said u should be thankful to the lord for being saved.
Far enough
To stop humans killing each other, we might have to rewrite the very essence of humans.
Evolution has not stopped the humans from self destruction. The Terminator era right now. Nobody wins in any war.
We are
In Colorado. I’m actually glad to be in this state. It’s pretty clear we would be annihilated quickly which is fine with me. I’m actually relieved about this. I don’t want my family and I to suffer by surviving the blasts.
"Even small wars are dangerous in a nuclear world" - John F Kennedy
no such thing as a small nuclear war
@@spenser6353your response is the reason why I believe humanity is doomed. You failed to understand a simple statement🤦🏾♂️
@@QFromFloridait's sad
@@QFromFlorida youre a surface level thinker
@@spenser6353 that's not what he said. Get comprehension.
There is no fight. Only the end of life
You say that like it's a bad thing?
@@RichardDressler youd rather die than live?
@@vladthepistol3974
He who would trade safety for freedom deserves neither.
@@vladthepistol3974id rather not see a wicked world continue
@@mvflp2218its a pendulum. It always swings in both directions at some point. Only time it stops is extinction.
...An elderly Despot with health issues and access to the nuclear codes might just decide to take the World with him...
I think 2 more people have to be involved.
That is hopefully not happening but that person and known vindictive behaviors it's anyone's guess
@@RepentfollowJesusObama and kamala
Mr. President, the code please:
*merrmuhbumburr*
"It's him."
Underrated comment 😂
lmao
.
It will be:
Mr. President the code please;
Launch my beautiful nukes!
"It's him"
@@HughMongusJazzhole are you stupid?
The sad thing is those behind the war will live in cosy bunkers. Where will you be, poor and innocent civilian?
until the fuel runs out to power the bunkers. They they have to come out too,
Who would want to live in a bunker at some point they would have to come out. I’m afraid it would be pointless as the nuke winter would last for years and years best not send nukes.
government bunker locations are well documented worldwide. Every country has them targeted with overkill. multiple warheads on that target. they are hardened for penetrating the earth and destroying the bunker and its contents.
It wouldn’t be that great.. would be like prison. Plus those bunkers will turn into coffins if any survivors up top discover them.
The peons will have front row seats to the fireworks 🎆
Who's here after WW3 ?
Me
😂😂😂
My skin is falling off and my teeth are falling out but I’m here.
According to historical documents, WW3 was almost 500 years ago before we moved to Proxima Centauri c 3000 years ago.
Me
Aliens far out in space " why does that world have a gun pointed at its own head?"
Every sentient species goes through what we are now, someone will discover fission, and either they bombard themselves to the stone age, come back to modern times, do it again, or hopefully have history books.
@@PK-pp3lu A bit arrogant to say EVERY species goes through this, but we only have a sample size of one, so...........
@MrHav1k His point is valid. Almost like "growing pains". Unless they had planet with no predators and everyone singing Kumaya around a fire, they've killed eachother or other species before.
@@ragnoxis05 Many ordinary people are brainwashed into being a Virgin Mary, just like the small countries around Athens during the Athenian period, believing in fairness, justice, equality, social harmony, and prosperity in Athens. Your attitude towards aliens is like this worship of converts
@PK-pp3lu That is true. That is why some scientists like Francis Drake have suggested we met no aliens because the rate at which civilizations develop communicating and spaceflight technology equals the rate at which they pass away.
The elite people would run into the bunkers for protection, and the common people would end up dying suddenly, that's it!
this is good thing
then the elite will go after each other and nobody will be left standing (or breathing )
On the assumption their bunker is incredibly strong and hermetically sealed, and that they have enough oxygen, food, and water supply. That said US nuclear war head are bunker piercing Kearn ng their lesson from Iraq. So simply put, nuclear is inescapable for all, and is just a matter of who gets burn out first. 😊
☣️🪩
Elites can't live too long in their bunkers
When I was young, I had plans to survive the nuclear winter. I lived under the threat in the 80s - even took a class on nuclear strategy. But nowadays, I just hope I’m in the fireball.
Me too. The most beautiful thing I have ever seen
I work down the road from a RR factory that builds the Royal Navies Submarine reactors. It’s a comfort to know when nukes hit I will be spared the horror that comes after.
Yeah, same here. Living in Eastern Europe, close to military airfield, I won't feel a thing lol.
Totally, looking at the NUKEMAP, my house would be gone in the initial blast given my proximity to one of our major airforce bases in the southwest USA - easily a top target. I couldn't see anyone passing that one up.
Yeah, easy come easy go, let's go. If free Ukraine will not exists, why rest of the world should, let's gooooo.
@@Haunuva exactly I’ve lived a decent life it would be horrible if it ended due to radiation sickness or starvation or dehydration. A quick bright light and it’s over.
Unfortunately, that's a Comfort.
The complete scenario discussed here is described and played out in full in Stanley Alexander's book Darkest Days. It's a far worse nightmare than anyone can imagine.
Got a buddy that bought one of the decommissioned silos here in ND. Turned it into a car shop and it's actually pretty cool.
“In the nuclear age, the real enemy can’t be defeated. In my humble opinion, the real enemy is war itself.” Denzel Washington, “Crimson Tide.”
tell this all the lunatics who want to defeat Russia. Idiots, altogether.
Если бы такое оружие было только у вас американцев, вы бы так не говорили)
"War" just doesn't end well to begin with.
It seems WWII ended pretty well. The global economy is still based on how it ended.
..."Either War is finished, or we are" Herman Wouk...
When I was a kid in suburban New York, in elementary school, we had 'duck and cover' drills meant to survive a nuclear attack from the Soviet Union. But they were eventually stopped because survival really wasn't credible, especially living so close to a major target. We knew, as children, that it would only take thirty minutes for an ICBM to reach us from the USSR.
The common joke was, "In case of nuclear attack, put your head between your knees, and kiss your ass goodbye."
At least the iss crew could Witness the Ultimate Madness with a 4K view
and realize they WONT be returning to earth because they need all that help from below to get them back. they will freeze after their fuel runs out, and or starve after their food and water run out.
I'm British and i was in the RAF. On our crew room wall we had a map of every russian target in the UK. It was leaked information and accurate. Every city and town was targeted as was every airport, civilian and military, every port, civilian and military and every power staion including nuclear power stations, railway yards, military bases and bridges. The total number of warheads was 280. 280 nuclear warheads on a small nation! Every major city had 4 designated nukes aimed at it! Now repeat this for the USA! Not many in the northern hemisphere would survive.
Very grim. Political leaders, royals and infrastructures will then be gone. What remain will be nuclear contaminated land and water. UK will be without civilisation as from that point. Sad.
That is honestly horrifying
I'm sure a few would probably explode on the launcher, given how poor Russian equipment seems to be.
@@tobler88You won't want to check this out.
Quit your shit
Rest of the World uses high tech and huge armies to get their intel.
Meanwhile this channel... 'You have a new subscriber - KimJongUn'
This really should be taught in school
Helloooo 😊
They did do nuclear war drills back in the day.
Man I love videos like this, it's better than any horror movie, just the perfect video to help me sleep 😊❤️
You’re a sick fuck
I love it😂
this is the nightmares robert oppenheimer had about nuclear power
The world will never be the same. You don't even want to think of a nuclear war. And good luck trying to survive. through a nuclear war. Everything on Earth would be ruined
I always told my wife if all out nuclear broke out we are better off being vaporized quickly by the nuclear explosions because if we survive that we will die slowly of radiation sickness, starvation or nuclear winter or all!
@@ThomasMckenzie-mo6qn further more if so called leaders of Russia n North Korea think they are safe in a hardened bunker somewhere? Maybe for a while but eventually they must come up and what they find is irradiated wasteland above
@terrondt
Please believe in Jesus Christ and call upon his name, then you will be saved from this catastrophic war..🙏🏻
That day is a day of wrath, a day of trouble and distress, a day of wasteness and desolation, a day of darkness and gloominess, a day of clouds and thick darkness,
A day of the trumpet and alarm against the fenced cities, and against the high towers.
And I will bring distress upon men, that they shall walk like blind men, because they have sinned against the LORD: and their blood shall be poured out as dust, and their flesh as the dung.
(Zephaniah-1:15-17)
Gather yourselves together, yea, gather together, O nation not desired;
Before the decree bring forth, before the day pass as the chaff, before the fierce anger of the LORD come upon you, before the day of the LORD's anger come upon you.
Seek ye the LORD, all ye meek of the earth, which have wrought his judgment; seek righteousness, seek meekness: it may be ye shall be hid in the day of the LORD's anger.
(Zephaniah-2:1-3)
All those rich people can hide in their underground prisons and think they will inherit the Earth after most everybody dies.They are only preventing their death for a short time and won't want to live in what's left.
wrong. nothing on earth would be ruined outside the areas nuked. elon musk already dispeled that notion. you would have to drop millions of nukes to seriously damage earth. russians tested their nukes pretty close to their own cities and even used strongest nuke ever produced, tsar bomb - nothing seriously bad happened to their cities or finland which was relatively close. the damage of a nuke is very much contained within the blast radius
The better question is how far will we go to prevent a nuclear attack in the first place.
well stop moving nato eastward would be a good start
@@blackyboi2885 No it would not. Russia should not be allowed to rape and pillage and massacre innocent people in the name of russian imperialism.
That's why we have to vote🗳
Trump 2024 the only one men who talk about that kind of war..
@@cesar_X24 Trump Wouldn’t have a clue. He’s out of his depth
@@blackyboi2885 if Russia hadn’t threatened its neighbors they wouldn’t have sought membership
the submarine maintenance is hilarious. do you really think you have a station to go back to?
There are allied facilities that may not get wiped out.
You guys are all scared, there are hundreds of thousands of port city's and maybe 12,000 nukes. I think way less than that are functionally, and to destroy a port like San Diego it would take 6-10 nukes
Fighting? Please stop. There is no fighting, only dying.
I completely understand your point. The focus should be on prevention and diplomacy, as the reality of nuclear conflict is only devastating loss.
@@FactCheckPro2003 I do agree with you.
There is return fire.
Guess nobody dies from getting shot then?
It is amazing to think how far the Neanderthal man has gone to create his own destruction.
Is it though? Because pretty sure cavemen did the same shit. They just used sticks and stones instead
Neanderthals are extinct.
@@JohnDoe-qu7gm I don't remember doing that to my neighbors the Homosapiens.
Tun
@@space1commander they did. Humans from the dawn of time took what they needed or wanted from other weaker humans. No different then any animal species
In a documentary about the Vulcan bomber a former pilot made the chilling statement namely that if they had ever been scrambled for real, by the time they'd got over Norway there would have been no UK left to return to & that was in the 60,s! The recent re-showing of the TV series Threads was pretty scary & sobering too!
Cowering inside their fancy nuclear bunkers, waiting to be one of the last unlucky humans to go exstinct, that's how.
Bunkers won't save anyone unless they can sit in there for thousands of years and wait till parts of the Earth become habitable again.
@@deebee4575my brother…have you heard of Hiroshima, Nagasaki, or perhaps Chernobyl?
“President needs 5-10 minutes to make a decision”.. yeah in that case we’re fucked lmao
Yeah by then we’re all probably dead. I’d just push the button if the other side already did. Yolo
He will be asleep or on the beach. The VP will start giving the order with "I grew up in a middle class...", and by the time she is finished US will look like a Falllout game. That's the sad situation dems have put the country in. So hopefully they'll just jump straight to the house speaker for orders.
If the Donald gets in, again sure he'll be on the golf course or getting his makeup on.
Let's hope it's not the case!!
@@garyfelton2987like Kamala is any fucking better.
@@garyfelton2987tds is scary
Really good video.
There's a saying "if it's been built it will be used"
Its never a single warhead. Most have multiple warheads.
Suprised this wasnt mentioned
"MIRVS" can be used two ways: Detaching and hitting multiple targets, or kept together to make a "Tsar Bomba" (Russia) or "Sasquatch" (U.S.) 50+ Megatons either way
It was mentioned in the video
Exactly. There would never be "just one warhead launched" anywhere, by anyone. Everyone's ICBMs and SLBMs have multiple warheads each (even if each missile has 3-4 warheads with a couple hundred kilotons yield per each, which they may or may not be reduced to nowadays with arms reduction treaties and agreements, it's surely sobering and scary enough to think about). Realistically any launch in anger from a country and the following retaliatory launch(es) from the other country or countries once the first missile is detected in the sky (most likely would be multiple countries launching their missiles because of agreements and treaties and pacts for allies to help each other in the event of an attack) would be an exchange of a WHOLE LOT of missiles sent from each side, that is to give the greatest chance of a higher number of warheads actually reaching their intended targets to achieve maximum effect, because some of them would possibly either fail or likely be intercepted by different weapon systems and taken out before reaching their target. No matter what, the whole idea of this is seriously scary and a very dismal thing to think about ever happening to humanity in our lifetimes. Nobody actually wins. One thing that truly scares me is nuclear war, plain and simple.
@@joshy_b_823 Its MAD (Mutually Assured Destruction). Thats probably what prevented it from happening in the cold war. The scary bit is that the limited use of battle field nuclear weapons in support of a conventional war seems to be acceptable. Countries seem to have forgot that this still risks being mad.
We don't want war!!. I like eat steak drink beers, nice cars, nice house, swimming pool, beautiful beach and heaps of girl friends 😅😅❤❤😅😅❤❤. Why can't we enjoy life
Just make sure you don't marry, impregnate or cohabitate with any of these women if you want to keep these things.
Hiding in bunkers and waiting inevitable death! 😂😂😂😂😂
I have watched numerous documentaries from Trinity and beyond you name it. I have to say this was very well put together, excellent job and sad but true.
“I don't know what weapons World War III will be fought with, but World War IV will be fought with sticks and stones.” ~ Albert Einstein.
SIOP: everything’s a nail, the U.S. is THE hammer
your videos are awesome i will watch your next episode
Ai Narrator, nice job.
On a side note I vividly remember doing nuclear drills at my primary school in the 80s in the UK, during a nuclear explosion they taught us to go under our desks, or make youselves as small as possible, in other words lay down face first on the ground, or hide behind a slope to give youself a better survival chance from the blast shockwave.
So when they say give youself a better survival chance, the odds are still stacked against you surviving from the initial shockwave, it makes you realise survival isn't really an option. Scary thought as a 8 year old kid back then. 🙄
this is the only planet in the milky way galaxy that can support life as we know it
They have a plan but you know what Tyson said.
The only way to win is to not let it start😮
Man, those alarms are scary asf
“Only the dead have seen the end of war”
Those people who died Naturally By age is Very Lucky not to Witness this Madness
Imagine the world dying because some humans are too weak to fight off the evil in their minds and hearts.
fight off the evil ....hahahahah oh my grow up!
@@rolandkeith5322 take your own advice, chump. 🥴
@@rolandkeith5322 take your own advice 🥴
@@aspiringvoiceactor645 Oh come back of the year right there!
Life is evil
Scary, Do more videos about on space. I don't like learning about how we will all die from a nuke
“Power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely.” - 19th century writer Lord Acton
"A STRANGE GAME. THE ONLY WINNING MOVE IS NOT TO PLAY."
- "Joshua" from "War Games"
Everyone is standing knee-deep in gasoline and waving matches at each other, the only difference is that some have 2-3 matches and others have a whole box of matches, but the end result is the same for everyone.
This makes no sense if you actually read it
"I you ever fight in a nuclear war, you will be forever damned and tou will lose the war" - Benjamin Franklin
yes because Ben Franklin was Alive 400+ into the 1940's... wth man -_-
honestly, if the world goes full nuclear - it was nice knowing you all, wherever you are from and wherever we all will be going.
"Sir, an enemy is launching an ICBM against our country, what is your order."
President Trump: "It don't matter, we have the big bombs, we got the best bombs, our bombs have the best looks and the best technolo...."
*boom*
Just make sure to be at impact center, you won't feel a thing.
Mutiually assured destruction used to be a deterrent. Now it seems inevitable
When there is a nuclear strike against the United States, the most devastating places to hit are the volcanic calderas which have rising magma pockets ready to blow. The caldera at Yellowstone, for example, sits on the continental divide and has access to the network of fault lines beneath the earth. This network would cause such devastation that there will be millions who will die without anyone firing another shot. Military bases would be in severe risk due to the loss of the skies. All flights would be canceled due to the amount of volcanic dust in the air as a hazard to aircraft engines. Then, earthquakes would take infinitely more lives while the air is filled with volcanic ash and nuclear winter. The catch is...the depths of the volcanic eruptions will cause a chain reaction of earthquakes will also start many of which will be reverberating back and forth. The ability to intercept incoming nuclear ICBMs would have a difficult time due to the resulting affect of EMPs while natural disasters are taking place from earthquakes. The fault lines in the oceans surrounding the United States causing tsunamis like the which this world has never known. With such continuous effects, much of the US nuclear arsenal will be out of commission or completely destroyed. Now, recalibrate your worst case scenarios based on this strategic devastation happening.
So, where did I hear about his plan? A Russian general suggested it on American television networks a couple of decades ago and I have never forgotten it.
"We think we're heroes
We think we're kings
We plan all kinds of fabulous things
Oh look how great we have become"
Faithless
1 submarine can destroy
1 country
let that sink in!
My theory is that nuclear apocalypse "happens" all the time, we just keep collapsing into the weirder and weirder timeline where it doesn't happen, because a universe without observers would not exist
Interesting
That's an interesting theory:
My initial theory is that this world has gone through multiple nuclear apocalypse's, hence why we don't fully understand ancient civilizations. As a way to keep the population from growing too rapidly to prevent overuse of limited resources. I understand that modern science debunks this, but in the state of the world, is modern science becoming a propaganda piece to prevent others from thinking this?
Form is emptiness, emptiness is form.
It already happened this is a perditory dimension
The universe definitely would exist.There just would be no one to record its existence.Dont kid yourself This Universe and the others ones were here before and will be there after if humanity were to end or no consciousness existed intelligent enough to record the universes existence
Very well done 👍 it was good video can u pls make video on india and pakistan nuclear war stimulation
The living will envy the dead.
Already do
I'm seeing these video's a little too much now on UA-cam, I'm getting a bit concerned 🧐
Not to dismiss the possibility but we’ve crossed Putin’s “red line” repeatedly and he hasn’t started anything despite his bluster
No reason to be concerned. Because if it was to happen there's nothing we can do about it. We people are the population of the world we have no say. That's the sad thing
@@jessaphillips2846Putin's not going to do anything. He knows what would happen and I believe he wants to live. Not die .
It is an election year, spreading fear is the thing for them to do.
@@ThomasMckenzie-mo6qn That what they said about invading Ukraine... "He fears Nato he wants to live he will not invade" over 5 years he warned about invading Ukraine if Nato expanded... They said he was bluffing until 2022 February.. Now let's continue saying he's bluffing again... We'll see how that end
The game is over. There is no winner. It's just over.
This morning, the first ever live-fire launch of an intercontinental ballistic missile at the city of Dnipro took place! Congratulations, friends, we are very close to the end of history
Never underestimate the stupidity of the human race.
Bro we know.
Awesome
That was the best nuclear video I've ever seen. I tip my hat to the curator and orator. 🚀 ☠️💥💢
Watch the movie from 1983 called The Day After. It might be on youtube.
@wantsome-zs5sq I will definitely watch that film. Thanks.
@@Miller4866also the film THREADS.. on youtube now
If nuclear war start. It’s goes like this you launch then I launches we both die in a bloody laugh. 🤭🤭😂
The title is a great question
It’s a good thing that the US has over a thousand nuclear weapons in reserve, just in case the actives are all used up.
Can't tell if you are joking.
Brain of a grasshopper
@@jazzyjeff019 pleas don’t insult grasshoppers.
Sarcasm intended…..
Nukes vs nukes, great. No bills to pay.😅😅😅
Insane topic. When it comes to this, the world is toast. Give peace a chance.
Peace is nothing but a pipe dream in life.
My advice to all, is do what I've done. Purchase some land way out in a rural area, dig yourself a water well, go off the grid, put in a bomb shelter, grow a vegetable garden, raise chickens, purchase as many RME as you can find, buy a diesel & solar generator and pray!
the problem is in a month your crops would be dead. with in 6 months the planet would decrease to -10 degrees. Unless your garden is underground using thermal power you will be dead in about a year. The bunker would also face many problems where would you get fresh air. The answer is no where. Its all radiated
Someone lurking around,unnoticed,watching you may decide too eliminate you and take all your stuff.There is strenth in numbers in rural areas.
@@danhall2197 Very True , But first and foremost nobody ask to be on earth and live / die . So I don’t know what everyone is to expect . Death is an experience within itself and so is life obviously .
It’s so foolish to think that prepping would actually save your ass. Even if you survived, what would there be to live for, when there’s nothing left?
😂😂😂
It’s fucking disgusting that these weapons are even allowed to be created.
Too many old people in the US Senat that lived a good life and don't care what happens to the world when they die.
Everything sucks anyways
At 15,000 mph there is no defense against speed when they re-enter. That's fantasy.
Nuclear Winter would kill all humans in the Northern Hemisphere. Does your bunker have 10+ years of food storage?
If it happens we're all going to loose
not quite
Speak for yourself. Oblivion, here we come baby!
How can we do this? I mean how as animals of reason and compassion can we inflict such harm on all life on our planet? To what end? I am watching 2 doves snuggle with each other out my kitchen window. Earlier today a deer and her 2 babies walked down the street together. I live near the Rocky Mts. I am watching humans ruin entire habitats and every life form. We are insane creatures of habit, greed, and sloth, who don't care about anything but ourselves.
just to let you know....movies like the matrix....terminator...i robot.....etc....guess what? the humans were the bad guys/villians...when you look deep into it..
Answer: the human species is wicked and calculating.
Dont be such a judgmental pessimist
You ever think its not just something unique to humans to build such vast weapons of eradication and death? What if it is just the nature/theme of this universe? Imagine we find proof of advanced alien civilizations and they too have weapons of destruction?
"compassion" 🤧💀
Im located in the Pacific Northwest and he is spot on. 😮
Minnesota has no silos but we do have Lockheed Martin
We have more than what's public knowledge , I joined the US Army in 2005 was a 12N " combat engineer " and we had to build new bunkers underground for em. And that's when I was told n shown we have many extras we have way more than 5,500
And here you are giving that info willingly to a UA-cam comment section? Opsec dude.
And do we have plans to open those bunkers to civilians if shit hits the fan?
Camp Century history. It's been reactivated ua-cam.com/video/28NYczAuXl4/v-deo.htmlsi=iqBC310-3_lMlxTe
This means that you have been deceiving the whole world for decades that you have 5550 nuclear warheads, while you may have 30000 warheads, this means that you have always been cheaters in everything! but it won't even save America! it will disappear in a nuclear war as if it never existed together with the entire science and everything it owns! better said, the entire northern continent will disappear as if it never existed!
Joke of the universe! Which American soldier is this with loose tongue?
Humans. Greed and power . Can’t be stopped
Getting anxious about that last days cause of Putin’s warning about NATO letting Ukraine hit their land with long range missiles…
Putin is a criminal and stupid, but his generals have no desire to see their wives and children incinerated. This war is not existential for Russia and it has no need to resort to suicide. Putin on the other hand is unlikely to survive this misadventure of his own creation.
As you should since It's a risk he can not take - and every reasonable person should understand that very point... Yet most don't.
That was American missiles okayed by bumbling Biden…..the fool.
90,000,000 seems like a low estimate
agrered..be more like 3 or 4 billion in first few hours and billions more weeks later etc.
@CSIG1001maybe not that many but, in the case of all out nuclear war, even though not every country will be hit; nuclear winter will cripple the rest of the world, sunlight blocked, temperature down, black rain, millions of crops and animals will die in due time, leading to atleast a billion deaths, in my opinion. if it does happen, we will see who is right in these comments. hope that day never comes.. can agree on that i believe
@@blackyboi2885 I think it'll be closer to a few hundred millions in the first day of nuclear war. Around 5 billion will die from famines, disease, and complete lack of infrastructure, on top of the radiation.
@@hactavisyou say a billion like it’s a Lot. We all know 75% of that will be third world poop holes that are overcrowded to begin with
We,are,living in very dangerous times😢
Always have been
Anyone wanna have fun thought process watch something called threads in bbc. Having went through covid and seeing how quickly rationing happens from supermarket panic buying while logistics were working I’d hate to be a civilian living through a nuclear attack. I’m all the way out in the countryside so while I’ll may survive living afterwards without supermarkets and the ability to buy foods is scary.
Don’t worry the fall out will slowly take you out.