How Would The United States Fight A Nuclear War?
Вставка
- Опубліковано 15 лис 2024
- How Would The United States Fight A Nuclear War?
Why might a nuclear war start? What could push someone to make the unimaginable decision to launch such devastating weapons? In this video, we'll explore how the United States might respond if faced with a nuclear conflict.
The U.S. nuclear defense is based on the "Nuclear Triad." This means there are three ways to launch nuclear weapons: land-based missiles, submarines, and strategic bombers. This setup ensures that if one or two methods are compromised, the U.S. can still retaliate.
First, there are 400 Minuteman III intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs) in silos across states like Montana and North Dakota. These missiles can be launched within minutes and have a range of over 13,000 kilometers. Interestingly, there are also 50 empty silos used as decoys to confuse enemies.
Second, the U.S. has 14 Ohio-class submarines armed with Trident II missiles. These submarines are stealthy and can stay underwater for up to 90 days. Each carries up to 20 missiles with incredible accuracy, capable of hitting targets within 100 meters even from thousands of kilometers away.
Third, strategic bombers like the B-2 Spirit and B-52 Stratofortress can deliver nuclear bombs stored at various military bases.
If a rogue leader ordered a nuclear strike against the U.S., early warning systems would detect it. Satellites like the Space-Based Infrared System (SBIRS) can spot missile launches almost instantly by detecting the heat from their engines. Ground-based radars confirm the threat to reduce false alarms.
The President would have about 10 to 15 minutes to decide on a response. The decision is communicated through secure channels using the "football," a briefcase containing strike options and authentication codes. If the President is unable to act, the chain of command passes to the Vice President or another designated leader.
Historical plans like the Single Integrated Operational Plan (SIOP) showed the devastating potential of nuclear war during the Cold War. Simulations suggest that a full-scale nuclear conflict could result in millions of deaths within hours and long-term catastrophic effects like nuclear winter.
Sources:
en.wikipedia.o...
www.defense.gov/
www.af.mil/
www.navy.mil/
Subscribe to Science Time: / sciencetime24
#nukes #sciencetime #nuclearwinter
Fight, they will be no fighting, just a lot of innocent people dying, while the culprits sit in their bunkers.
The aliens will prevent it
@@squirrelsinjacket1804 I wish they were true
@@squirrelsinjacket1804может наоборот ..
@@wulfrache I think only the Swiss have enough bunkers
@@wulfrache lmfao yea
Ronald Reagan : *"A Nuclear War cannot be won and should never be fought"*
Smart player is who never play it
@@Amen6magi Smart players want to forcefully play
"A strange game. The only winning move is not to play."
- "Joshua" from "War Games."
@@JoshSealy-qx5mm i luv Ronnie Raygun.
@@Amen6magi bot
Why go to Mars when you can bring it here
Last button push before it would be over, so be the first to push all the buttons ?
Fastest way to get to Mars
hahaha great comment
@@jimmyjimmy-k5c I second that lol
i'm dead
Mr. President, the code please:
*merrmuhbumburr*
"It's him."
YOU WIN THE INTERNET, SIR
Underrated comment 😂
lmao
.
A nice impersonation of Trump 😂
I work down the road from a RR factory that builds the Royal Navies Submarine reactors. It’s a comfort to know when nukes hit I will be spared the horror that comes after.
Yeah, same here. Living in Eastern Europe, close to military airfield, I won't feel a thing lol.
A strange game. The only winning move is not to play.
Another wise move: don't antagonize a nation with most number of nuclear arsenal.. when he's pushed against the wall, he will strike!
Great movie and ending! #wargames
at least thats the point
How about a game of chess instead?
Greetings professor Falken
Someone once said, under a nuclear war exchange the survivors will envy the dead
Einstein said something similar, something like: "I don't know with what weapons WWII will be fought with but I know the next one will be with sticks and stones.
@@dalycooley-ef4inThat implied WW2 was going to be the end of the world. Not WW3 because by then we would have nothing to fight with
@@eligreg99 No it didn't imply WW2 was going to be the end of the world. Stop spewing nonsense. Get off the drugs.
That's exactly correct..
yep. That was Nikita Khrushchev. And he was right.
You don't fight a nuclear war - you simply perish either from the initial strike or months later. Too many people locked into PC game mode and divorced from reality.
That's actually a myth I used to think the same thing.
@@anabelandralph5418how can you proof that?
@@anabelandralph5418 well explain the context of the myth
@@anabelandralph5418 I too thought that nuclear winter was a myth after all. It isn't. The immense majority of people would die from hunger long before agriculture became possible again.
@@Alsacienexactly who the hell wants to survive after the initial blasts?!? Life is going to be hell
Props to the amazing graphics team on this video... Great visual and production value.
"They won't fear it until they understand it. And they won't understand it until they've used it"
I'm 70 and I used to envy young people for having a much longer life ahead than me, but now with the risk of nuclear war higher than ever, I have the opposite feeling that young people should envy old people like me who lived in the best of times.
im 37 and I approve this message.
The righteous begin their good life after death. Happy you had a good life see you in the after.
Completely concur now with this comment. Thank God you have had the fortune to live your best years sir
Very well put.us old folks did enjoy the best of times...69 years of it here and today's young people could get wiped out at any time if war hits.
Well said granpa.
Flower generation.
There is no fight. Only the end of life
You say that like it's a bad thing?
@@RichardDressler youd rather die than live?
@@vladthepistol3974
He who would trade safety for freedom deserves neither.
@@vladthepistol3974id rather not see a wicked world continue
@@mvflp2218its a pendulum. It always swings in both directions at some point. Only time it stops is extinction.
There is no such thing as "fighting" a nuclear war, there is only losing one.
You still fight even if you lose. In most knife fights, you both lose in the end. The loser dies in the street, and if the loser did their job the winner dies in hospital.
Except for the one who wins
@@easterlinear No one would win a strategic nuclear exchange. Everything would be destroyed. We are talking about thousands of nuclear weapons being detonated.
Correct. You loose as firing one will mean suicide for anyone. Its a loss for both parties.
@@curtisevans8413 The best option is not to fight at all. What are they fighting for if both fighters and their respective populations will be decimated eventually. There will be no future left for anyone in civilization.
What use is military force when all means of production and supply chains are destroyed? Hiding in bunkers and radiation shelters can prevent immediate death, but no guarantee for painless natural death.
I'm British and i was in the RAF. On our crew room wall we had a map of every russian target in the UK. It was leaked information and accurate. Every city and town was targeted as was every airport, civilian and military, every port, civilian and military and every power staion including nuclear power stations, railway yards, military bases and bridges. The total number of warheads was 280. 280 nuclear warheads on a small nation! Every major city had 4 designated nukes aimed at it! Now repeat this for the USA! Not many in the northern hemisphere would survive.
Very grim. Political leaders, royals and infrastructures will then be gone. What remain will be nuclear contaminated land and water. UK will be without civilisation as from that point. Sad.
That is honestly horrifying
I'm sure a few would probably explode on the launcher, given how poor Russian equipment seems to be.
@@tobler88You won't want to check this out.
Quit your shit
I hope during any generation those sirens are never heard. Imagine waking up at 3 A.M by those lovely sirens.
We haven't come very far as humans, still fighting wars and killing each other.
Blame the eastern autocracy and dictator led world and there aggression and oppression
@@LiamTate-b1v dude white people steal america from local indian people,and they said u should be thankful to the lord for being saved.
Far enough
To stop humans killing each other, we might have to rewrite the very essence of humans.
Evolution has not stopped the humans from self destruction. The Terminator era right now. Nobody wins in any war.
Aliens far out in space " why does that world have a gun pointed at its own head?"
Every sentient species goes through what we are now, someone will discover fission, and either they bombard themselves to the stone age, come back to modern times, do it again, or hopefully have history books.
@@PK-pp3lu A bit arrogant to say EVERY species goes through this, but we only have a sample size of one, so...........
@MrHav1k His point is valid. Almost like "growing pains". Unless they had planet with no predators and everyone singing Kumaya around a fire, they've killed eachother or other species before.
@@ragnoxis05 Many ordinary people are brainwashed into being a Virgin Mary, just like the small countries around Athens during the Athenian period, believing in fairness, justice, equality, social harmony, and prosperity in Athens. Your attitude towards aliens is like this worship of converts
@PK-pp3lu That is true. That is why some scientists like Francis Drake have suggested we met no aliens because the rate at which civilizations develop communicating and spaceflight technology equals the rate at which they pass away.
The sad thing is those behind the war will live in cosy bunkers. Where will you be, poor and innocent civilian?
until the fuel runs out to power the bunkers. They they have to come out too,
Who would want to live in a bunker at some point they would have to come out. I’m afraid it would be pointless as the nuke winter would last for years and years best not send nukes.
government bunker locations are well documented worldwide. Every country has them targeted with overkill. multiple warheads on that target. they are hardened for penetrating the earth and destroying the bunker and its contents.
It wouldn’t be that great.. would be like prison. Plus those bunkers will turn into coffins if any survivors up top discover them.
The peons will have front row seats to the fireworks 🎆
I have watched numerous documentaries from Trinity and beyond you name it. I have to say this was very well put together, excellent job and sad but true.
Incredibly informative! This video breaks down the complexities of nuclear strategy in a way that’s easy to understand. A must-watch for anyone interested in military defense!
"Even small wars are dangerous in a nuclear world" - John F Kennedy
no such thing as a small nuclear war
@@spenser6353your response is the reason why I believe humanity is doomed. You failed to understand a simple statement🤦🏾♂️
@@QFromFloridait's sad
@@QFromFlorida youre a surface level thinker
@@spenser6353 that's not what he said. Get comprehension.
The elite people would run into the bunkers for protection, and the common people would end up dying suddenly, that's it!
this is good thing
then the elite will go after each other and nobody will be left standing (or breathing )
On the assumption their bunker is incredibly strong and hermetically sealed, and that they have enough oxygen, food, and water supply. That said US nuclear war head are bunker piercing Kearn ng their lesson from Iraq. So simply put, nuclear is inescapable for all, and is just a matter of who gets burn out first. 😊
☣️🪩
Elites can't live too long in their bunkers
“In the nuclear age, the real enemy can’t be defeated. In my humble opinion, the real enemy is war itself.” Denzel Washington, “Crimson Tide.”
tell this all the lunatics who want to defeat Russia. Idiots, altogether.
Если бы такое оружие было только у вас американцев, вы бы так не говорили)
Cowering inside their fancy nuclear bunkers, waiting to be one of the last unlucky humans to go exstinct, that's how.
Man I love videos like this, it's better than any horror movie, just the perfect video to help me sleep 😊❤️
"War" just doesn't end well to begin with.
It seems WWII ended pretty well. The global economy is still based on how it ended.
Fighting? Please stop. There is no fighting, only dying.
I completely understand your point. The focus should be on prevention and diplomacy, as the reality of nuclear conflict is only devastating loss.
@@FactCheckPro2003 I do agree with you.
The complete scenario discussed here is described and played out in full in Stanley Alexander's book Darkest Days. It's a far worse nightmare than anyone can imagine.
My advice to all, is do what I've done. Purchase some land way out in a rural area, dig yourself a water well, go off the grid, put in a bomb shelter, grow a vegetable garden, raise chickens, purchase as many RME as you can find, buy a diesel & solar generator and pray!
the problem is in a month your crops would be dead. with in 6 months the planet would decrease to -10 degrees. Unless your garden is underground using thermal power you will be dead in about a year. The bunker would also face many problems where would you get fresh air. The answer is no where. Its all radiated
Someone lurking around,unnoticed,watching you may decide too eliminate you and take all your stuff.There is strenth in numbers in rural areas.
@@danhall2197 Very True , But first and foremost nobody ask to be on earth and live / die . So I don’t know what everyone is to expect . Death is an experience within itself and so is life obviously .
It’s so foolish to think that prepping would actually save your ass. Even if you survived, what would there be to live for, when there’s nothing left?
😂😂😂
The animations, graphics and explanation are really top notch. 🔥🔥
“President needs 5-10 minutes to make a decision”.. yeah in that case we’re fucked lmao
Yeah by then we’re all probably dead. I’d just push the button if the other side already did. Yolo
He will be asleep or on the beach. The VP will start giving the order with "I grew up in a middle class...", and by the time she is finished US will look like a Falllout game. That's the sad situation dems have put the country in. So hopefully they'll just jump straight to the house speaker for orders.
If the Donald gets in, again sure he'll be on the golf course or getting his makeup on.
Let's hope it's not the case!!
@@garyfelton2987like Kamala is any fucking better.
@@garyfelton2987tds is scary
The world will never be the same. You don't even want to think of a nuclear war. And good luck trying to survive. through a nuclear war. Everything on Earth would be ruined
I always told my wife if all out nuclear broke out we are better off being vaporized quickly by the nuclear explosions because if we survive that we will die slowly of radiation sickness, starvation or nuclear winter or all!
@@ThomasMckenzie-mo6qn further more if so called leaders of Russia n North Korea think they are safe in a hardened bunker somewhere? Maybe for a while but eventually they must come up and what they find is irradiated wasteland above
@terrondt
Please believe in Jesus Christ and call upon his name, then you will be saved from this catastrophic war..🙏🏻
That day is a day of wrath, a day of trouble and distress, a day of wasteness and desolation, a day of darkness and gloominess, a day of clouds and thick darkness,
A day of the trumpet and alarm against the fenced cities, and against the high towers.
And I will bring distress upon men, that they shall walk like blind men, because they have sinned against the LORD: and their blood shall be poured out as dust, and their flesh as the dung.
(Zephaniah-1:15-17)
Gather yourselves together, yea, gather together, O nation not desired;
Before the decree bring forth, before the day pass as the chaff, before the fierce anger of the LORD come upon you, before the day of the LORD's anger come upon you.
Seek ye the LORD, all ye meek of the earth, which have wrought his judgment; seek righteousness, seek meekness: it may be ye shall be hid in the day of the LORD's anger.
(Zephaniah-2:1-3)
All those rich people can hide in their underground prisons and think they will inherit the Earth after most everybody dies.They are only preventing their death for a short time and won't want to live in what's left.
@@terrondtbest way to go. you will feel no pain
It is amazing to think how far the Neanderthal man has gone to create his own destruction.
Is it though? Because pretty sure cavemen did the same shit. They just used sticks and stones instead
Neanderthals are extinct.
@@JohnDoe-qu7gm I don't remember doing that to my neighbors the Homosapiens.
Tun
@@space1commander they did. Humans from the dawn of time took what they needed or wanted from other weaker humans. No different then any animal species
My theory is that nuclear apocalypse "happens" all the time, we just keep collapsing into the weirder and weirder timeline where it doesn't happen, because a universe without observers would not exist
Interesting
That's an interesting theory:
My initial theory is that this world has gone through multiple nuclear apocalypse's, hence why we don't fully understand ancient civilizations. As a way to keep the population from growing too rapidly to prevent overuse of limited resources. I understand that modern science debunks this, but in the state of the world, is modern science becoming a propaganda piece to prevent others from thinking this?
Form is emptiness, emptiness is form.
It already happened this is a perditory dimension
The universe definitely would exist.There just would be no one to record its existence.Dont kid yourself This Universe and the others ones were here before and will be there after if humanity were to end or no consciousness existed intelligent enough to record the universes existence
Had the amazing oppurtunity to work with ICBMs when I served in Wyoming for 4 years
Its never a single warhead. Most have multiple warheads.
Suprised this wasnt mentioned
"MIRVS" can be used two ways: Detaching and hitting multiple targets, or kept together to make a "Tsar Bomba" (Russia) or "Sasquatch" (U.S.) 50+ Megatons either way
It was mentioned in the video
Exactly. There would never be "just one warhead launched" anywhere, by anyone. Everyone's ICBMs and SLBMs have multiple warheads each (even if each missile has 3-4 warheads with a couple hundred kilotons yield per each, which they may or may not be reduced to nowadays with arms reduction treaties and agreements, it's surely sobering and scary enough to think about). Realistically any launch in anger from a country and the following retaliatory launch(es) from the other country or countries once the first missile is detected in the sky (most likely would be multiple countries launching their missiles because of agreements and treaties and pacts for allies to help each other in the event of an attack) would be an exchange of a WHOLE LOT of missiles sent from each side, that is to give the greatest chance of a higher number of warheads actually reaching their intended targets to achieve maximum effect, because some of them would possibly either fail or likely be intercepted by different weapon systems and taken out before reaching their target. No matter what, the whole idea of this is seriously scary and a very dismal thing to think about ever happening to humanity in our lifetimes. Nobody actually wins. One thing that truly scares me is nuclear war, plain and simple.
@@joshy_b_823 Its MAD (Mutually Assured Destruction). Thats probably what prevented it from happening in the cold war. The scary bit is that the limited use of battle field nuclear weapons in support of a conventional war seems to be acceptable. Countries seem to have forgot that this still risks being mad.
The better question is how far will we go to prevent a nuclear attack in the first place.
well stop moving nato eastward would be a good start
@@blackyboi2885 No it would not. Russia should not be allowed to rape and pillage and massacre innocent people in the name of russian imperialism.
That's why we have to vote🗳
Trump 2024 the only one men who talk about that kind of war..
@@cesar_X24 Trump Wouldn’t have a clue. He’s out of his depth
@@blackyboi2885 if Russia hadn’t threatened its neighbors they wouldn’t have sought membership
This really should be taught in school
Helloooo 😊
They did do nuclear war drills back in the day.
At least the iss crew could Witness the Ultimate Madness with a 4K view
and realize they WONT be returning to earth because they need all that help from below to get them back. they will freeze after their fuel runs out, and or starve after their food and water run out.
"A STRANGE GAME. THE ONLY WINNING MOVE IS NOT TO PLAY."
- "Joshua" from "War Games"
We have more than what's public knowledge , I joined the US Army in 2005 was a 12N " combat engineer " and we had to build new bunkers underground for em. And that's when I was told n shown we have many extras we have way more than 5,500
And here you are giving that info willingly to a UA-cam comment section? Opsec dude.
And do we have plans to open those bunkers to civilians if shit hits the fan?
Camp Century history. It's been reactivated ua-cam.com/video/28NYczAuXl4/v-deo.htmlsi=iqBC310-3_lMlxTe
This means that you have been deceiving the whole world for decades that you have 5550 nuclear warheads, while you may have 30000 warheads, this means that you have always been cheaters in everything! but it won't even save America! it will disappear in a nuclear war as if it never existed together with the entire science and everything it owns! better said, the entire northern continent will disappear as if it never existed!
Joke of the universe! Which American soldier is this with loose tongue?
I'm seeing these video's a little too much now on UA-cam, I'm getting a bit concerned 🧐
Not to dismiss the possibility but we’ve crossed Putin’s “red line” repeatedly and he hasn’t started anything despite his bluster
No reason to be concerned. Because if it was to happen there's nothing we can do about it. We people are the population of the world we have no say. That's the sad thing
@@jessaphillips2846Putin's not going to do anything. He knows what would happen and I believe he wants to live. Not die .
It is an election year, spreading fear is the thing for them to do.
@@ThomasMckenzie-mo6qn That what they said about invading Ukraine... "He fears Nato he wants to live he will not invade" over 5 years he warned about invading Ukraine if Nato expanded... They said he was bluffing until 2022 February.. Now let's continue saying he's bluffing again... We'll see how that end
Scary, Do more videos about on space. I don't like learning about how we will all die from a nuke
Man, those alarms are scary asf
Ai Narrator, nice job.
On a side note I vividly remember doing nuclear drills at my primary school in the 80s in the UK, during a nuclear explosion they taught us to go under our desks, or make youselves as small as possible, in other words lay down face first on the ground, or hide behind a slope to give youself a better survival chance from the blast shockwave.
So when they say give youself a better survival chance, the odds are still stacked against you surviving from the initial shockwave, it makes you realise survival isn't really an option. Scary thought as a 8 year old kid back then. 🙄
They have a plan but you know what Tyson said.
That was the best nuclear video I've ever seen. I tip my hat to the curator and orator. 🚀 ☠️💥💢
Watch the movie from 1983 called The Day After. It might be on youtube.
@wantsome-zs5sq I will definitely watch that film. Thanks.
@@Miller4866also the film THREADS.. on youtube now
1 submarine can destroy
1 country
let that sink in!
I knew nuclear war will be the newest way of defending democracy and the next step towards making the world safe for democracy.
"We believe the price is worth it" - Madeline Albright
American attitude to the idea of peace: The CIA already advised Kennedy that the USA should start a nuclear war against the world, especially against the Soviets. The US population up to approx. 40% would survive, but the rivals would disappear. And then you can start all over again, but without opponents and enemies. In reality, this is the deep American attitude. Kennedy was shocked by the thought. That is why the USA has a president today, who is not at all shocked by such thoughts. The world should not be afraid of China, not of Russia, but of the USA, which was once a hope but has become a monster.
no wonder they killed him
Right. Because its the US constantly threatening the use of nukes. Never, not once, has Russia, North Korea, Iran, or China literally threatened their use against the US and other Western nations.
Its all the US that is the real threat. What with all their existing and whatnot
and yet millions clamor to enter this monster. How many people are fleeing to enter the PRC or the RF?
Russia is the one giving nuclear threats every other day in Ukraine war ,not the US.
I am a Trump supporter, but J.F. Kennedy was one of the greatest POTUS ever.
Really good video.
Intelligence is primarily about survival. If so, then an earthworm is more intelligent than the human race. If the Earth will one day become uninhabitable due to human activity, we can thank our Nobel laureates for that.
Defending OUR democracy worldwide is more important than survival. We're the United States for God's sake!
Exactly
@@Kounomura , not exactly. Thank the braindead or stupid politicians who lead the world into a thermonuclear war.
That's why do NOT underestimate the power of stupidity in a leadership country that has nuclear power.
extremely well said and put. and done so quickly without alot of beasting around the bush.
SIOP: everything’s a nail, the U.S. is THE hammer
We need a star wars system that can keep all these war heads off our coast. But it will happen one day, man always destroys itself
Getting anxious about that last days cause of Putin’s warning about NATO letting Ukraine hit their land with long range missiles…
Putin is a criminal and stupid, but his generals have no desire to see their wives and children incinerated. This war is not existential for Russia and it has no need to resort to suicide. Putin on the other hand is unlikely to survive this misadventure of his own creation.
As you should since It's a risk he can not take - and every reasonable person should understand that very point... Yet most don't.
Insane topic. When it comes to this, the world is toast. Give peace a chance.
Hiding in bunkers and waiting inevitable death! 😂😂😂😂😂
These bombs should only be used on alien warships if other species tries to invade
How do you defeat an enemy that would rather die (martyrdom) than live?
It’s not just tridents accuracy although is mostly GPS. It is its reliability. Countries like Russia and china nukes half of them would fail to launch or actually hit its intended target. Trident will hit 90% of the time.
Imagine the world dying because some humans are too weak to fight off the evil in their minds and hearts.
fight off the evil ....hahahahah oh my grow up!
@@rolandkeith5322 take your own advice, chump. 🥴
@@rolandkeith5322 take your own advice 🥴
@@aspiringvoiceactor645 Oh come back of the year right there!
The title is a great question
your videos are awesome i will watch your next episode
90,000,000 seems like a low estimate
agrered..be more like 3 or 4 billion in first few hours and billions more weeks later etc.
@@blackyboi2885 no thats not how it works
@@CSIG1001maybe not that many but, in the case of all out nuclear war, even though not every country will be hit; nuclear winter will cripple the rest of the world, sunlight blocked, temperature down, black rain, millions of crops and animals will die in due time, leading to atleast a billion deaths, in my opinion. if it does happen, we will see who is right in these comments. hope that day never comes.. can agree on that i believe
@@blackyboi2885 I think it'll be closer to a few hundred millions in the first day of nuclear war. Around 5 billion will die from famines, disease, and complete lack of infrastructure, on top of the radiation.
It’s a good thing that the US has over a thousand nuclear weapons in reserve, just in case the actives are all used up.
Can't tell if you are joking.
Brain of a grasshopper
@@jazzyjeff019 pleas don’t insult grasshoppers.
This is the coolest thumbnail in history.
Nothing cool about genocide. If it was cool it would have symbols of peace, and the person that brought us peace and out of wars like Trump.
It’s a dumb thumbnail. Bombers don’t fly INTO and over a Nuclear Explosion.
not exactly:
nuclear weapons armed bombers from USA could still be en route to target, while USA has already been nuked by opponents using SLBMs, or ICBMs
because USA has already attempted to nuke opponents by other means, with SLBMs and ICBMs, but it didn't work out successfully, as intended
Would be cooler if it had Trump. You know the candidate of peace using the LAST means of fighting back, because he had to, not because he could, unlike a certain You Know Who.
@@grdfhrghrggrtwqqu I just want to not spend $400 a week on groceries lol
Too many old people in the US Senat that lived a good life and don't care what happens to the world when they die.
And you Think Russian Sits Idle And Not Retaliate , Not Mentioning China And North Korea. You Are A Fool if You Believe There's No Payback
We have something they don't. Defense systems to protect us.
@@travishartman5662Bruh missile defense ain't shit and can be easily saturated with tons of decoys . It's like
@@travishartman5662 What do they not have? And what are the Russian S-500 and S-550 systems? And in any case there is no anti-aircraft system capable of stopping a saturation attack. The famous Israeli Iron Dome is proof of this, it was punctured by massive rocket launches by Hamas.
Imagine what a saturation attack by hypersonic missiles, much faster than Hamas rockets, would be capable of doing.
Russia is the only one constantly threatening to use Nukes, no one wins even if you wipe out all of America we have nuclear submarines, our allies have nukes, there is no pathway to victory in a nuclear war. Then the fallout not only radioactive but humanity will hate the aggressor that started it.
@@travishartman5662 defense systems cant stop all the missles. dont be naive
If it happens we're all going to loose
not quite
Perhaps the U.S should STOP escalating Hostilities around the World 🙏✌️
Oh I forgot....the US invaded Ukraine. 🤡
True but Biden and Kamala would rather destroy the US.
Oh yeah like Russia invading Ukraine
Yes, and you think Russia, China, Iran, North Korea, and Syria are stabilizing influences in the world today? Really?
so what happens if the president is bat shit crazy? (any part of this statement that resembles real life is just a coincidence) 🙄
How can we do this? I mean how as animals of reason and compassion can we inflict such harm on all life on our planet? To what end? I am watching 2 doves snuggle with each other out my kitchen window. Earlier today a deer and her 2 babies walked down the street together. I live near the Rocky Mts. I am watching humans ruin entire habitats and every life form. We are insane creatures of habit, greed, and sloth, who don't care about anything but ourselves.
just to let you know....movies like the matrix....terminator...i robot.....etc....guess what? the humans were the bad guys/villians...when you look deep into it..
Answer: the human species is wicked and calculating.
Dont be such a judgmental pessimist
You ever think its not just something unique to humans to build such vast weapons of eradication and death? What if it is just the nature/theme of this universe? Imagine we find proof of advanced alien civilizations and they too have weapons of destruction?
"compassion" 🤧💀
Dreadful to think of, phew, one minute peace, next minute Nothing All gone Dreadful scenario
I live in Washington DC, the city which would be the first to go, and I tell you I think about this all the time. It causes me so much anxiety.
These will be the lucky ones, around 90% of humanity will die from starvation withing 5 years.
Nuclear war starts when a country thinking they are one of the strongest military on Earth realized they are the weakest when it comes to a non nuclear battle.
We are
In Colorado. I’m actually glad to be in this state. It’s pretty clear we would be annihilated quickly which is fine with me. I’m actually relieved about this. I don’t want my family and I to suffer by surviving the blasts.
I like how the algorithm decided to put all of this nuclear war content in my feed immediately after Trump was elected...
What algorithm?
What this video fails to mention is that the U.S. only has 44 interceptor missiles. Nowhere near the amount needed to stop a full Russian or Chinese nuclear launch.
are you sure its not between 1 and 1000?
@@Kenbark42 I am very sure. Lol
Talking is cheap
@@BearNecessities-XMan proof plz, i do my researches, never heard of that. What I do know is, your underestimating the shit out America, bc America has secret shit nobody knows about, stop playing games
@@BearNecessities-Xdumb
What if we stage thousands of AI controlled kamikaze drones in every city? If a missile attack is incoming they can all launch and use on board sensors along with regional radars and space tracking to be the final defense against incoming attacks.
You and who? Juvenile thinking!
ok so far makes sense. but how far out can these drones fly out to meet incoming nukes? and how expensive will these thousands costs to keep prepared for immediate use endlessly? keep in mind incoming nuke missile war heads enter at steep angles and at ultra extreme speeds, so if anything your plan needs FAST production and TESTING of really long range drones with unheard of NEW LONG RANGE speed capability. all things considered i doubt this can or will work.
The problem is when the enemy doesn't calculate.
There's no fighting a nuclear war there's only trying to survive a nuclear war. Most people wont.
I live 10 miles from a 1st strike location. If this kicks off I don't want to be around.
No where to run, no where to hide.
If it kicks off the closer you are to ground zero the better
I live in Washington DC and honestly it terrifies me because we're the first to go and guaranteed 30 minutes is not enough time to evacuate even if the streets are clear.
10 miles is too far away. Move into a 4 mile radius and you'll be fine!
You maybe one of the lucky ones
Zelensky - "the John the Baptist of Nuclear war"
That’s what gets me is this idiotic hypersonic missile they’re acting like it’s new we’ve had hypersonic missile since World War II what do you think the V2 German missile was it was a hypersonic missiles.
except the new ones are 4.5x faster.. and nuclear..
Hypersonic missiles aren't only determined by speeds. Why you think Us is spending so much money on hypersonic tech 🤡
Moscow to London ...3 seconds...London dies. That's how fast these things are.
@@thedoftranquillity bull
@@thedoftranquillity 3 seconds from where?
You dont fight a nuclear war we all die.except for the ones who started it all , they retreat to their huge bunkers and wait it out.
Why building nuclear weapons at the first place?
as long as 1 counry has them all mus have them, there is no peace trought strenght but war.
@@lmeza1983 obviously
If country A doesn't develop them, country B will - and then the country A feels like they are at a disadvantage. That's why there is no stopping the devolpment of AI either. Once it has started, everybody wants in on it in order to not fall behind.
I'm honestly worried for the time that someone like Kim or Putin are on their deathbed for natural causes, whether sickness or old age, and out of pure spite decide to launch all their nukes because they have nothing to lose. It's not like they're the type of people who care about anyone else, including their own people. The thought that they have the power to end the world at any moment, especially if they know it's close to their last moments, terrifies me.
I'm sorry but that sounds like a heavily propagandized paragraph, and it ignores the reason why North Korea and Russia developed nukes in the first place.
The US developed the bombs first, so what did they do? Use them. Then they considered using them in the Korean war, but ultimately decided not to, by then the USSR was already on the nuclear arms race. Many years later the US would succeed in de-nuclearizing Libya, and then its government was overthrown and now it's under a state of constant instability and missery, a model that some officials proposed for North Korea during the Trump administration.
So when you are able to develop nukes, show them off when you're not doing good, scare the crap out of the biggest superpower on Earth (who you know will make all its citizens just as scared with the help of the media), and get to negotiate with them without even de-nuclearizing in the end, suddenly Kim Jong-un looks like the most sane and predictable man alive.
But somehow thousands of pagers belonging to Hezbollah members in Lebanon had bombs planted in them and no one is concerned about the technology we're consuming.
@@JM57-99 It is simply a logical theory and/or valid concern, not a propagandised theory, be for real. It never ignored the reason nukes were invented at all. Additionally not a single thing you said is relevant to my main point nor does it disprove my scenario.
It’s was a very simple concept. Kim Is unhinged, perhaps not so unhinged to destroy the world while he’s in good health enjoying his life while his people are living hell, but a deranged Pos nonetheless. And this isn’t propaganda, a shred of common sense, knowledge and research can tell you how evil he is. “Reason” can go out the window if he’s on his death bed, has nothing to lose and wants to go out with a bang. He has that power and that alone is scary. Even if there is some sort of confirmation process “requiring” multiple other officials to sign off and confirm the launches and they don’t want to, what are they going to do? Refuse? I’m sure they won’t be quickly assassinated with a backup replacement already in place for a failure to comply.
Perhaps Putin might be a little less sadistic and maybe even care for his people’s future somewhat. I wouldn’t put it passed him completely either but it might be a little less likely. At the end of the day, it’s merely a reasonable concern, maybe such a thing won’t happen with them or in our lifetime. But the idea that such things that can destroy the majority of the world at any moment exists and any future leader/dictator can have the power to do so is scary nonetheless.
Putin and kim are unpredictable. Cold war is back
Putin especially. He has less respect for human life than we have for pests such as mice. The cavalier way that he extinguishes people, whether it be political opponents or the Ukrainian people really aggravates me.
It has always been the US, the chief manipulater that knows no bounds
These people are crazy. They think that they can fight it. 🤯
You have 27 minutes from the time of launch. That's it you're not shooting anything down you have no time and probably no chance.
Imagine the day it goes from "A nuclear war" to "The."
It's not a matter of if this happens, but when.
Lets hope this wont age well 😂😂
😂😂
So what happens when your satililight gets jammed?
You mean the Army of satellites? I'm sure there's landline systems still operational.
@@JohnDoe-qz1ql both China and Russia have satililights that can jam and or shoot other satellites
@@troygach9228 Of course, they don't have the capacity to destroy All of the US's satellites.
@@JohnDoe-qz1ql well they seem to be doing better with satililights over Ukraine than the U.S. @ the moment!
Submarines with SLBMs are given pre written orders if contact cannot be made with the mainland
Great vid, my only suggestion would be lowering the volume on the air raid sirens. It can make it difficult to hear the narrator.
“Only the dead have seen the end of war”
Am lucky got a bunker and have 5 to ten years water food etc but it was a waste time buying and stocking it up nuke war will never happen fact
Need to up those provision reserves, the area would be radioactive for minimum 15K years.
How will you not freeze to death in five years
@@yannaalbarracin1165 well said. depending on where he dug his bunker he might get buried under TONS of yellowstone ashes as well, be suffocated or his escape hatch totally buried so deep he will never be able to dig out.
I'm no expert, but I definitely saw in another video that American ICMBs carry multiple warheads that have a 475 kiloton yield each.
The way you're saying it here sounds like it's a total yield of all warheads.
Anyone know which one is right? 475 kilotons across like 16 warheads sounds smaller than what modern technology could furnish.
the minuteman 3 ICBM can carry 3 warheads, 475kt each. for reference, about 23x more powerful than the bomb dropped on nagasaki. look up the aftermath if you havent seen it. the Russian rs-28 sarmat ICBM, carries 10, 750kt warheads (35x nagasaki bomb), 15-16 lighter warheads, 3 hypersonic glide vehicles all capable of nuclear payloads. (according to russian media/wikipedia)
This being posted 3 days before a nuclear warning by Putin is crazy timing.
Which one?
@@Typical_Human549 The first one. Has there been more?
Mutiually assured destruction used to be a deterrent. Now it seems inevitable
If nuclear war start. It’s goes like this you launch then I launches we both die in a bloody laugh. 🤭🤭😂
Check up SARMAT II and than ask yourself: What would happen to USA ?
I heard one exploded in a test some days ago. Without the nuke thou. Left a hage ass crater.
USA weapons do work. What would happen to Russia?
@@CrucialConflict. What is happening in Ukraine is on scope and scale which NATO was not even able to imagine and has no answer to it. NATO has almost no ammo left, no artillerry , no tanks, no missilles to stand up Russia. Imagine, U. K. , or some people in U.K. want to fight Russia directly while only having 40(!) Chalanger tanks in working order :) Ridicul*us NATO is a paper tiger. Nato spent 2O years learning how to fight Afghan wedding parties and Iraqi villagers, because that is pretty much what NATO was doing. NATO forgot how to do a large scale ground combat. NATO even has no means to do large scale combat. China is there for Russia, Russia is there for China.... Who is there for USA? United Kingdom with their 40(!) Chalenger tanks in working order ??? Or Germany? Germany is not only 100% out of ammo, but on the top of that Germany was even bombed by USA!!!!(Nord Stream) Ridicul*us NATO, unfortunately still able to make the mess around the globe !!! Pay attention to the Houthis: If USA can not stop the Houthis, at what magical world are they living, that they believe they can fight Russia or China ? They can not even supply Ukraine with 155mm shells…
@@mirekslechta7161 Is that you Ivan? Shouldn't you be fire-fighting in Toropets? 🤣😂
@@Facts_vs_Opinion Do not believe to all propaganda photos, it is easy to make... Try to realize that timing is spot on now....