@@10054 Actually, you should say there is a possibility rather than non-zero chance, because there is zero chance of the quantum tunneling not happening. (If you wait to infinity, but let's say that it's possible) For example, there is zero chance that you randomly choose a real number and it's 1.5, but it is a possibility PS: woooosh!
a tremendously misunderstood yet simple and important detail of quantum mechanics and the wave function collapse is that, by "observing" the particle to make it "choose" a state, "observing" just means bombarding it with other particles so that we can read what it returns and measure it. Just like you need light to bounce off your neighbors's house to peek into it, you need the same to see a particle, but this time it's like hitting a house with a house...
People need to stop ignoring this. You, yes YOU reading this, your perception is not special. Your perception of reality does NOTHING to it. You HAVE to spread this knowledge, this is your divine mission.
@@onethreeseventhree Its why science communication is so important, because it seems like 99% of scientists are terrible at actually communicating their findings in a way that is useful outside of their own field.
the way you explain these concepts and tie them into real life "to-scale" hypotheticals is very fascinating. I think a lot of people would love to see more content focused around that.
It doesn't work because of these 2 words: Atoms repel! Because the nucleus is positive, and electrons are negative, so they repel each other, which is why we cannot phase through objects! Also, when we touch things, we do not feel the atoms; we feel the repulsive force of the atoms, which varies, creating unique textures, similar to how we hear sound as mechanical waves; we see light as electromagnetic waves, we smell scents that are caused by ethers, and we taste flavors that come from inhibitors.
It’s probably like trying to throw an object through a fan that is spinning at extremely high speed, except instead of one fan, both sides are made of billions of tiny fans, and they are spinning so rapidly that they might as well be solid
You do realize they're called troll physics for a reason, no one thinks they actually work. the whole gimmick is making a joke out of a common misinterpretation of physics.
To observe and collapse a quantum superposition, the particle has to be interacted with another particle, like a photon for example. Quantum physics is very hard to explain in under a minute, but I've gotten intuitive understanding.
fun fact: theres a astronomicaly low chance that, if you slap your table the atoms in your hand and the atoms in your table will miss each other, resulting in a slap through the table.
What the? I just watched a 40 minute long video about what Pauli's exclusion principle is and why you can't pass through walls, and now I see meme about it on this channel. Can we get a probability of this, boys?
Okay, first you tell me that Electrons are everywhere at the same time within their "area", then you show me overlapping orbits of electrons (within which, they are everywhere, as you have said) only to then proceed to tell me that "according to this law, 2 electrons cannot be in the same place". I eagerly await the next Einstein who will finally tear this nonsensical model down. This simply cannot be correct and I wish I was smart enough to prove it :/
What he is talking about in the video is heisenberg's uncertainty theory basically the more you know about the speed of an electron the less you know about its location with the modern atomic model it shows a cloud with a denser collection of dots being the area electrons are more likely to be electrons also DO NOT follow orbits on the quantum scale because of their energy(this is different from speed) and no they arent everywhere because atoms are 99% empty you misunderstood what he meant by electrons can be anywhere I eagerly wait for the next einstein to prove me right and expand upon this "nonsensical" model
@BQCAF So what you're saying is that you can't figure out where the electron is, so you can only guess. This does not mean that the electron doesn't have a determinate position at all times, it just means that we don't have the technology or the understanding to figure it out yet. What you nerds keep saying is a complete nonsensical self-contradiction (see Schrödinger's cat) and when we ask for proof, you show us this 5 story tall equation that only has Greek symbols in it, not even a single letter, let alone a number. Forgive me if I don't take your word for it. When I was in school, the teachers could clearly show us how stuff worked and they could easily prove us wrong and humiliate us if we challenged them. So go on, put me in my place, tell me how wrong I am. Explain to me how the cat is both alive and dead at the same time. Explain to me how as soon as I look at a molecule, it goes OH SHIT and kindly informs me of its position. NOT that I just simply didn't know where it was, oooh no no no, you see, it was in BOTH positions! Naaah, I wasn't wrong about that, it's just that when you look at them, they stop being in both places at the same time!...yes, they are definitely in 2 places at the same time, you can just never see it and we can never show you in any way. It's like telling a child that their toys come alive at night, but as soon as they look at them, they stop.
@@jabloko992 yo, u have a rlly great motivation rn, maybe u should try to do your own reseach and hopefully create a better quantum physics model! Everybody would be happy in the end of it.
@@jabloko992 My guy, it is much more complicated than that. You can actually study the topic to completely and thoroughly understand it, but I can garantee you that quantum mechanics, one of the most successful models at explaining and predicting physics as we observe it, which has been debated, worked on and iterated upon for like 100 years now is not some "nonsensical model" invented by "nerds". It is not a question of you being smart and realizing something that everyone else does not. Hopefully there are some good, high quality science communicators that can explain these concepts in a more digestible way and without the innacuracies that come with youtube comments, maybe someone else in the comments can recommend one. I understand you're probably not able/willing to litterally go get a degree in physics, but do not take the simple explanations for people outside the field given by youtube comments and short youtube videos like this as being some kind of proof that physicists don't know what they're talking about. And do not conflate your ignorance for genius.
If you wait long enough every particle will quantum tunnel through the wall and assemble perfectly again.
Maybe if you wait TREE(3) years
@@accidentcarrot7225TREE(TREE(4)), more like.
@@accidentcarrot7225 what about TREE^{TREE(3)}(3)
No, there's only a chance that will happen. Even if you waited 'til infinity, there will always be a non-zero chance of that not happening.
@@10054 Actually, you should say there is a possibility rather than non-zero chance, because there is zero chance of the quantum tunneling not happening. (If you wait to infinity, but let's say that it's possible)
For example, there is zero chance that you randomly choose a real number and it's 1.5, but it is a possibility
PS: woooosh!
a tremendously misunderstood yet simple and important detail of quantum mechanics and the wave function collapse is that, by "observing" the particle to make it "choose" a state, "observing" just means bombarding it with other particles so that we can read what it returns and measure it.
Just like you need light to bounce off your neighbors's house to peek into it, you need the same to see a particle, but this time it's like hitting a house with a house...
Holy crap thank you
People need to stop ignoring this. You, yes YOU reading this, your perception is not special. Your perception of reality does NOTHING to it. You HAVE to spread this knowledge, this is your divine mission.
i absolutely HATE the anthropocentric phrasing that quantum mechanics has
Entirely correct and very important. It’s like trying to tell where a baseball is by throwing other baseballs at it.
@@onethreeseventhree Its why science communication is so important, because it seems like 99% of scientists are terrible at actually communicating their findings in a way that is useful outside of their own field.
To go through a wall, you simply heat up you and the wall until your and the walls' atoms lose their electrons and you both become plasma.
To go through a wall, a pickax might be easier or a battering RAM or door
the way you explain these concepts and tie them into real life "to-scale" hypotheticals is very fascinating. I think a lot of people would love to see more content focused around that.
It doesn't work because of these 2 words:
Atoms repel!
Because the nucleus is positive, and electrons are negative, so they repel each other, which is why we cannot phase through objects! Also, when we touch things, we do not feel the atoms; we feel the repulsive force of the atoms, which varies, creating unique textures, similar to how we hear sound as mechanical waves; we see light as electromagnetic waves, we smell scents that are caused by ethers, and we taste flavors that come from inhibitors.
so basically something like magnets pushing off eachother right
Source?
@ Coulomb's Law.
@@AlbertTheGamer-gk7sn You had to add that period in there to really own that guy!
I definitely agree
It’s probably like trying to throw an object through a fan that is spinning at extremely high speed, except instead of one fan, both sides are made of billions of tiny fans, and they are spinning so rapidly that they might as well be solid
good analogy
I want to meet the genius that comes up with these memes :d
Plural, genuises
You do realize they're called troll physics for a reason, no one thinks they actually work. the whole gimmick is making a joke out of a common misinterpretation of physics.
To observe and collapse a quantum superposition, the particle has to be interacted with another particle, like a photon for example.
Quantum physics is very hard to explain in under a minute, but I've gotten intuitive understanding.
Tyler’s viewcount per video:
Video 1: 16 views in two days
Video 2: 109 views in four hours
Video 3: 4k views in less than a day
fun fact: theres a astronomicaly low chance that, if you slap your table the atoms in your hand and the atoms in your table will miss each other, resulting in a slap through the table.
In other words atoms do not like different atoms outside of their friendgroup going near them
what if you were 100% positively charged
I think you'd explode
The simple answer is you would just disappear essentially
I never imagined that i could learn via shitposting
What the? I just watched a 40 minute long video about what Pauli's exclusion principle is and why you can't pass through walls, and now I see meme about it on this channel.
Can we get a probability of this, boys?
High probability because of UA-cam algorithm.
So this is just what noclipping into backrooms works
What does quantum mechanics have to do with USB’s? I’m assuming that real life quantum mechanics has very little to do with how Hollywood portrays it
As long as you can pass the electrons, go ahead.
This one is actually plausible. Though the chances are 1 in like quad trillion i think.
Okay, first you tell me that Electrons are everywhere at the same time within their "area", then you show me overlapping orbits of electrons (within which, they are everywhere, as you have said) only to then proceed to tell me that "according to this law, 2 electrons cannot be in the same place".
I eagerly await the next Einstein who will finally tear this nonsensical model down. This simply cannot be correct and I wish I was smart enough to prove it :/
fr bro I hate that feeling
What he is talking about in the video is heisenberg's uncertainty theory
basically the more you know about the speed of an electron the less you know about its location
with the modern atomic model it shows a cloud with a denser collection of dots being the area electrons are more likely to be
electrons also DO NOT follow orbits on the quantum scale because of their energy(this is different from speed)
and no they arent everywhere because atoms are 99% empty you misunderstood what he meant by electrons can be anywhere
I eagerly wait for the next einstein to prove me right and expand upon this "nonsensical" model
@BQCAF So what you're saying is that you can't figure out where the electron is, so you can only guess.
This does not mean that the electron doesn't have a determinate position at all times, it just means that we don't have the technology or the understanding to figure it out yet.
What you nerds keep saying is a complete nonsensical self-contradiction (see Schrödinger's cat) and when we ask for proof, you show us this 5 story tall equation that only has Greek symbols in it, not even a single letter, let alone a number. Forgive me if I don't take your word for it.
When I was in school, the teachers could clearly show us how stuff worked and they could easily prove us wrong and humiliate us if we challenged them. So go on, put me in my place, tell me how wrong I am.
Explain to me how the cat is both alive and dead at the same time.
Explain to me how as soon as I look at a molecule, it goes OH SHIT and kindly informs me of its position. NOT that I just simply didn't know where it was, oooh no no no, you see, it was in BOTH positions! Naaah, I wasn't wrong about that, it's just that when you look at them, they stop being in both places at the same time!...yes, they are definitely in 2 places at the same time, you can just never see it and we can never show you in any way.
It's like telling a child that their toys come alive at night, but as soon as they look at them, they stop.
@@jabloko992 yo, u have a rlly great motivation rn, maybe u should try to do your own reseach and hopefully create a better quantum physics model!
Everybody would be happy in the end of it.
@@jabloko992 My guy, it is much more complicated than that. You can actually study the topic to completely and thoroughly understand it, but I can garantee you that quantum mechanics, one of the most successful models at explaining and predicting physics as we observe it, which has been debated, worked on and iterated upon for like 100 years now is not some "nonsensical model" invented by "nerds". It is not a question of you being smart and realizing something that everyone else does not.
Hopefully there are some good, high quality science communicators that can explain these concepts in a more digestible way and without the innacuracies that come with youtube comments, maybe someone else in the comments can recommend one.
I understand you're probably not able/willing to litterally go get a degree in physics, but do not take the simple explanations for people outside the field given by youtube comments and short youtube videos like this as being some kind of proof that physicists don't know what they're talking about. And do not conflate your ignorance for genius.
Sadge
why it won't work
atoms getting lost☠
wall atoms moving with you☠
your body☠
everyday life☠
earth☠
physics☠
first hallo