Buddhism VS. Hinduism! (What’s the Difference?)

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 21 сер 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 2,9 тис.

  • @VishuddhaDas
    @VishuddhaDas  6 років тому +330

    PSA: Remember as I said in the video this summary is a MAJOR simplification of two philosophies & religions which have MANY sects and histories that could fit into their own entire videos. To encompass them all would take hours, this is just a very simple guide for beginners to help them get the gist of each practice & what it represents! The details are what they can discover on their own time! 😁 Ram Ram!

    • @ajstyles3999
      @ajstyles3999 6 років тому

      Koi Fresco *Vishuddha Das* do a video on ramadan and the spiritual and mental benefits of it

    • @MrNathan232
      @MrNathan232 6 років тому

      Your almost at 500K!

    • @PageAmrita
      @PageAmrita 6 років тому +1

      you can say that again! but i feel its your pure heart that is the greatest wisdom in all your videos! ram ram sat nam and om tara tu tare soha! love you brother

    • @ngawangjigme6200
      @ngawangjigme6200 6 років тому

      hey koi...the eight fold path is just the pheripheral of buddha's teaching...u wont find gautama in these teaching....only in sutra like vajra chetika and prajanparamita u may see him the authentic gautama..not just him ..also a girl hanging on his palm....

    • @Zarzarrb
      @Zarzarrb 6 років тому +2

      I wondered what your views on the caste system are?

  • @koryryan4558
    @koryryan4558 6 років тому +997

    I don't follow any religions, I just use some things from all religions and combine them to fit my needs

  • @kingmacklin27
    @kingmacklin27 6 років тому +998

    i don't think I could ever settle with either Buddhism or Hinduism alone. I love philosophies coming from both. Guess I'll just carve my own path.

    • @incubusk8r
      @incubusk8r 6 років тому +93

      lol believe it or not that makes you a Hindu then.

    • @sachchidananddubey58
      @sachchidananddubey58 5 років тому +43

      Thats what brahmin iss all. About.. Oneness

    • @sagunsiwakoti9152
      @sagunsiwakoti9152 5 років тому +58

      lots have already giving rise to vajrayana and tantric hindusim. u are not the first one there is a huge sect mixing both following shiva marga n buddha marga.. nepal has a lot who follow both.. being hindu i follow both

    • @humanbeing2722
      @humanbeing2722 5 років тому +27

      Whatever gives you peace go for it 😊

    • @surajahire744
      @surajahire744 4 роки тому +4

      KingMacklin and gamer engine you saved me from my biggest problem of life. Lots of happiness to you guys ♥️🤲💯

  • @tsshisonam5686
    @tsshisonam5686 6 років тому +742

    some scientists say Buddhism is not religion but Buddhism is science of mind.

    • @noeditbookreviews
      @noeditbookreviews 5 років тому +28

      I like that. That's like, the opposite of religion.

    • @sasankadeshanmohottige8477
      @sasankadeshanmohottige8477 5 років тому +34

      Very correct it is about developing the mind to think in an advanced state

    • @kimkim-mh7bv
      @kimkim-mh7bv 4 роки тому +18

      not everyone is buddha in buddism. You have feeling because you are human. Not everyone in christian is lord jesus. They can't accept crucified to save other. Not everyone in muslism is prophet Mohammad. If they are why middle east lose usa. Not everyone in Hinduism is god shiva or bramah etc. If so why india lose china. So to be buddhism. You have to learn to accept the truth. And learn to be clever and intelligent. Most billionaires see the point what buddha said. The most you give as intelligence. The wealth you will get. Buddha always said before you do something you had to know it first. Before you believe someone you have to understand it first. That's it.

    • @thephilosophermma8449
      @thephilosophermma8449 4 роки тому +14

      Really which scientist 🤣🤣😂

    • @caffemocca8855
      @caffemocca8855 4 роки тому +1

      Nah. Psychology currently occupies that position lol

  • @voluntarist3620
    @voluntarist3620 6 років тому +151

    “Live a good life. If there are gods and they are just, then they will not care how devout you have been, but will welcome you based on the virtues you have lived by. If there are gods, but unjust, then you should not want to worship them. If there are no gods, then you will be gone, but will have lived a noble life that will live on in the memories of your loved ones.” - Marcus Aurelius

    • @ramaraksha01
      @ramaraksha01 3 роки тому +5

      And the dominant religions of the day say virtues don't matter, what we have done in life doesn't matter all that matters is who we are devoted to? Only Jesus can get you Heaven, so one must polish the right shoes like things get done in Corrupt & Communist countries where knowing the right people will pay off
      Can't believe that the top religions in the 21st century are Corrupt & Communist freely preaching NAZI ideas

    • @b__w_4565
      @b__w_4565 3 роки тому +1

      @@ramaraksha01 right tho?!?

    • @ramaraksha01
      @ramaraksha01 3 роки тому +3

      @@b__w_4565 Shocking isn't it? That's the best minds of the day think the way to the easy good life is to beg and grovel down on their knees
      Ready and willing Nazis - ready to throw their neighbors - Buddhist, Hindu & Atheist - into hell. Who we are as people does not matter, we do not share their delusions and so we must suffer. For the Nazis, who the Jewish person was, did not matter
      To a Racist, who the black person was did not matter
      Religions like these preach the same hateful ideas OPENLY!
      Them getting the easy good life in Heaven is not enough, those who don't share their delusions must suffer endlessly
      Amazing how a religion making cheap & easy promises that they very well know can never be verified and even the listeners know that - yet are willing Nazis - ready to condemn innocents into gas chambers in hell
      Not one asks - What Exactly do we DO in Heaven? I don't see God have anything to get done, so billions of lazy bums are crowding in Heaven sitting about/snoring away for eternity? And this is the Grand Plan of God?
      It's one thing for a religion to make cheap promises of the good life, it's entirely different for billions of highly educated people to not ask any questions
      Not one asks how about my loved ones down on earth? Are they suffering, going thru hard times?
      Not one!
      Shameless, uncaring Nazis being rewarded by God!
      I keep pinching myself - am I really in the 21st century?

    • @b__w_4565
      @b__w_4565 3 роки тому +2

      @@ramaraksha01 I want to sit back maybe meditate with you and chat about the universe one day. I smoke weed but am starting to understand that life is more than just getting high. Even tho I literally love weed I’m aware there is more to life and it’s just a tool. Your awesome!!!!

    • @ramaraksha01
      @ramaraksha01 3 роки тому +1

      @@b__w_4565 And sadly Heaven, that the top religions of the day push, is just that - people claiming they will be soooooo happy, singing & dancing & praising God!
      I am going what? God has all these billions of people just sitting about, getting high telling him what a great guy he is, singing & dancing? And this is the Grand Plan of God?
      How does this make any sense?
      But if pleasures of the flesh is all they care about - then human life is wasted on them
      Animals don't have much in terms of dreams and aspirations - eat, poop, stay safe and have sex and have kids - that's about it - simple pleasures of the flesh is all they care about
      And so such people will be reborn as these animals
      I am glad that you have seen the light - Life is a Gift - not a sin, it is not a mistake by Adam. God didn't create this universe, this earth and so many like ours to keep them barren
      It is we humans that get to dream, to aspire - travel the stars one day, become the next Einstein, the next Mozart
      But with such dreams comes pain & suffering
      Life without pain & suffering, without dreams and aspirations is mere existence
      A rock exists, a tree exists - a rock is eternal
      Fools chasing after eternal "life" end up as rocks

  • @maunikgaming9294
    @maunikgaming9294 5 років тому +125

    I'm hindu from mayanmar..

    • @madeshshivam952
      @madeshshivam952 3 роки тому +7

      Hii bro... I'm from tamilnadu how my tamil brothers are there in myyanmar

    • @wojak5308
      @wojak5308 3 роки тому

      @@madeshshivam952 0

    • @madeshshivam952
      @madeshshivam952 3 роки тому +10

      @@wojak5308 🤣🤣🤣... 80%of myyanmar hindus were tamils... 😅

    • @khatapitagroup
      @khatapitagroup 3 роки тому +3

      Bhai ye he jyada hogaya sidha Myanmar pauch gaya

    • @hindu_sanatanadharma
      @hindu_sanatanadharma 3 роки тому +2

      Greetings from Indonesia. Are you burmese or indian?

  • @antalyagozleri2526
    @antalyagozleri2526 5 років тому +117

    I'm Singaporean Chinese and here we have many Chinese or Mahayana Buddhist temples / places of worship which are often built beside or within the same compound as Indian Hindu temples / places of worship; many Chinese and Indians offer prayers and incense to the gods and deities in both temples or Hindu / Buddhist sections of the same temple.

    • @lll2282
      @lll2282 2 роки тому +7

      same in india mainly the ancient indian temples which are around 800-1200 its very common to see hindu and buddist gods and in india we all go to each other temples and do offerings

    • @lll2282
      @lll2282 2 роки тому +3

      same in india hindu,jain,buddist temples are all built in same compund

    • @bharathdeva9407
      @bharathdeva9407 2 роки тому

      🙏🙏🙏

    • @rockwithsable
      @rockwithsable 2 роки тому +1

      Buddha opposed Temple, worship and even existence of God.

    • @VexyBall
      @VexyBall 6 місяців тому

      ​@@rockwithsable look at buddhist temples in Himachal Pradesh.
      🎉

  • @vyentro29
    @vyentro29 6 років тому +560

    Wow. Both of these make me feel like following Hinduism.

    • @tejasvi18joshi
      @tejasvi18joshi 6 років тому +52

      COPIED FROM JORDAN HUNT:
      The best way to understand the relationship between Hinduism and Buddhism is to first remove the label from what we now refer to as Hinduism.
      We lump this vast array of religious and philosophical constructs into one box and say, "it is this". But there is a subtlety that is lost when we think in this way.
      As apposed to thinking of Hinduism as this limited thing, with boxes to be checked off to qualify as "this" or "that," it is more useful to conceive of it as a multifaceted continuum. Buddhism is historically, fundamentally, and ideologically a part of that continuum. If we remove the cultural aspects of both religions it is quite easy to see that Buddhism is based in Vedanta. The goal of both religions is the same. Hindus want to attain Moksha. Buddhist want to attain Nirvana. Same goal different paths, but the same can be said about the branches of yoga.
      One of the major conflicts would have to be the Hindu concept of Atman. Buddhism does not believe in an individual "soul" as Hinduism does. But Hinduism views the Atman as an expression of Brahman, this is clear. So ultimately what is given the name Atman is Brahman. Not so different from the Buddhist belief that there is no individual self.
      Another conflict would be the devotional disparity between the two. A misconception about Buddhism is that it is agnostic and/or nihilistic. That's just not true. Deities have always been a part of Buddhism. There was no renunciation of gods, but the idea that they are a part of cyclic existence as well, and not a means of salvation. This can seem in contrast to Hinduism but it is stated in the Vedas that one must go inward to see the "Self". This is enlightenment. This is Buddhism.
      The concept of detachment in Buddhism can seem like nihilism, but it is not. It's letting go of ego. Letting go of sensual experience as reality. Not being attached to what is not "real". These are all concepts of Hinduism as well. The beauty of both religions is that they are not dogmatic, but empirically flexible and all about understanding and gaining true wisdom. So wherever one's own philosophy falls it is important to remember that.

    • @universeofopulence
      @universeofopulence 5 років тому +46

      Yes leilani....i studied Buddhism first and Hinduism now...and Hinduism is way way better.... it's my personal experience...u can try it too..

    • @parveshbisht4955
      @parveshbisht4955 5 років тому +36

      Death to Jewmerica & IsraHell! You can't be a buddhist . We respect lord buddha but i think you are disrespecting him .

    • @tejasvi18joshi
      @tejasvi18joshi 5 років тому +44

      @Stomper902 you don't know anything about Hinduism and Buddhism then. Btw these two words Buddhism and Hinduism are Very recent phenomenon. These are Abrahmics coined words in their ignorance

    • @constipatedbowels3473
      @constipatedbowels3473 5 років тому +27

      @Death to Jewmerica & IsraHell! U dnt know shit about Buddhism or Hinduism....concept of Advaita defeated Buddhism centuries ago and drove it out,purely on the grounds of Rationality ,logic and experience......u are a frustrated shitdongle who has a misinformed(or outright ignorant)perception of the Great Sanatana Dharma,and Buddha Dharma as well,and are using slander and cheap gimmicks to further embaress urself.....

  • @wn1629
    @wn1629 3 роки тому +178

    Buddhism and Hinduism both are best ❤️
    I'm a hindu and we Hindu's believe Buddah is our Monk!
    both riligion connect each other.!

    • @Chad.indian
      @Chad.indian 2 роки тому +12

      Namo buddhay

    • @rockwithsable
      @rockwithsable 2 роки тому +9

      Sorry Sorry brother, we buddhist are not best. If we believe we are best indirectly we are saying, other are not..you believe you are hindu and best...we don't want..Buddha's teaching is to identity reality and not imagination.

    • @Chad.indian
      @Chad.indian 2 роки тому +3

      @@rockwithsable jai bhim Sable

    • @MB_by_R
      @MB_by_R 2 роки тому +18

      @@rockwithsable Well said, I'm a Hindu and what you said is wonderful. Abrahamic Religions says they are true and best... We Don't say this, that's how we are different from them

    • @roadwolf8026
      @roadwolf8026 2 роки тому

      And hence better ?

  • @viky02fly
    @viky02fly 6 років тому +405

    Buddhism,Hinduism, Jainism, Sikhism all part of Sanatana Dharma

    • @diwansahib4010
      @diwansahib4010 6 років тому +25

      Zorastrianism philosophy is different from Sanatana Dharma. It doesn't have concept of reincarnation and incorporates philosophy of Heaven and Hell, which found its way in Abrahamic religions

    • @mogged6937
      @mogged6937 6 років тому +21

      Viky Dutta buddhism is totally different from hindunism

    • @viky02fly
      @viky02fly 6 років тому +31

      Death to Jewmerica & IsraHell! Hat's off to your knowledge may God give peace and happiness to your soul.

    • @viky02fly
      @viky02fly 6 років тому +29

      Death to Jewmerica & IsraHell! Ok then Buddha but I must say you didn't read Vedas or geeta lying is not a good thing and your thinking giving me the impression that you don't even follow Buddha's teachings.

    • @viky02fly
      @viky02fly 6 років тому +20

      Death to Jewmerica & IsraHell! What about Vedas??In Geeta did you found porn stars you mentioned above??

  • @thefrantasticmissfine
    @thefrantasticmissfine 6 років тому +374

    Buddhism is not robotic, Buddhists have familys, Buddhism is not agnostic, Buddhists have ceremonies, Buddhists (especially Tibetans ) practice yoga. Buddhism (ESPECIALLY Tibetan ) has color. Buddhism is clear that mind and cosmos are one. It's subtle, I know, but worth pointing out

    • @alexandrusorohan5709
      @alexandrusorohan5709 6 років тому +35

      Josh Zimmerman I agree, I think the Theravada and early Mahayana practices might’ve been a little more stoic, monastic and devoid of everything except that emptiness known as Sunyata. However, as you said Tibetan and Tantric Buddhism focus on the more colorful, alive aspects of consciousness and being. Would love to see a video in the future comparing Advaita Vedanta and Tibetan Buddhism since I feel those parallel each other more than just the general Buddhist and Hindu practices. Great video regardless!

    • @VishuddhaDas
      @VishuddhaDas  6 років тому +99

      i'm talking about the philosophies not the cultures around them. :)

    • @alexandrusorohan5709
      @alexandrusorohan5709 6 років тому +11

      Koi Fresco *Vishuddha Das* it must be hard to discuss these general philosophies when many of us think of the branch off subtypes such as different Buddhist practices and different Hindu practices. I started studying Buddhism, but more and more I keep gravitating towards Advaita Vedanta so thank you for elucidating on the general similarities and differences between both! Looking forward to more videos on this subject.

    • @ericbryant6097
      @ericbryant6097 6 років тому +6

      im not a devoted believer but the philosophy of those twos are the most peaceful not yet or never will be a organized sect/religion

    • @user-Void-Star
      @user-Void-Star 6 років тому +7

      Koi Fresco *Vishuddha Das*
      You know nothing koi.

  • @Ostarrichi996
    @Ostarrichi996 6 років тому +360

    Buddhism is heavy distorted. Gautama wanted to free the people from the rituals. And now every Bhuddist follower does rituals for him. Hahaa somehow sad :'(

    • @reconquistahinduism346
      @reconquistahinduism346 6 років тому +14

      TheElderScrollsKing
      This is what happens when your philosophy is unnatural , synthetic , fake , in genuine, rebelling rather than intellectual and false.

    • @user-Void-Star
      @user-Void-Star 6 років тому +20

      TheElderScrollsKing
      You have no idea what you are saying.

    • @fraterignatius9377
      @fraterignatius9377 6 років тому

      Ehhh nope

    • @Ostarrichi996
      @Ostarrichi996 6 років тому +6

      Gautama wanted people to meditate because fo the Kali-Yuga back then

    • @tejasvi18joshi
      @tejasvi18joshi 6 років тому +18

      rituals are part of life . no one can escape from it. have you seen nature, birds, animals they also perform rituals. dancing, singing are also rituals. Buddha was never against anything. abrahmic, communist, leftist minded people see Indian religions through their abrahmic, communist, leftist eyes that's why they always wrongly interpret Indian religions. abrahmic, communist, leftist ideologies are on outer world and society. Indians religions are based on inner world and cosmos . The Ashtang marg or Buddhism is the solution of Gautama questions which he was asking to himself since Childhood.

  • @joshdavidson9964
    @joshdavidson9964 6 років тому +277

    Both beautiful religions :)

    • @AKNSW
      @AKNSW 5 років тому +16

      Buddhism is not a religion,its a philosophy that teaches you to see through the illusion of reality,and explains cause and effect denys creationism

    • @comedyexpress990
      @comedyexpress990 3 роки тому +41

      @@AKNSW even hindusm isn't religion... Both are one, atlast Vishnu is also Buddha

    • @pb24waleofficial84
      @pb24waleofficial84 3 роки тому +6

      not both
      only beautiful budhism
      hinduism is very bad cast system

    • @joshdavidson9964
      @joshdavidson9964 3 роки тому +30

      @@pb24waleofficial84 Nah I like both

    • @pb24waleofficial84
      @pb24waleofficial84 3 роки тому +7

      as u wish
      hinduism dont belive in equality they based on class of cast .. upar cast lower cast .... bulshit hate it

  • @armanix4016
    @armanix4016 6 років тому +364

    Cracking open a woke one with the Koi's.

    • @3stanc
      @3stanc 6 років тому +2

      ExpandedMind ॐ hahaha

    • @MultiVersusEdits
      @MultiVersusEdits 6 років тому +4

      ExpandedMind ॐ You win.

    • @DeepakSharma-ej2js
      @DeepakSharma-ej2js 6 років тому +1

      ExpandedMind ॐ pardon me, but I want someone to explain what he has written. I thinks its a joke

    • @MultiVersusEdits
      @MultiVersusEdits 6 років тому +3

      Deepak Sharma Original joke: "Opening a cold one with the boys."

    • @itspoknok
      @itspoknok 6 років тому +3

      Comment of the day 😂😂😂

  • @angel-7637
    @angel-7637 6 років тому +128

    While I was watching the video, I remembered the time you practiced Buddhism and I can really feel the difference. At that time, you seemed more skeptical, harsh, distant and now, you seem more loving, more present, more sociable. Like we can literally feel your soul in here, more and more. And you smile so much more. Not saying that Hinduism is better than Buddhism, you must do what serves you, but I think its really beautiful to notice these differences. Lots of love to you my friend!

    • @tejasvi18joshi
      @tejasvi18joshi 6 років тому +23

      COPIED FROM JORDAN HUNT:
      The best way to understand the relationship between Hinduism and Buddhism is to first remove the label from what we now refer to as Hinduism.
      We lump this vast array of religious and philosophical constructs into one box and say, "it is this". But there is a subtlety that is lost when we think in this way.
      As apposed to thinking of Hinduism as this limited thing, with boxes to be checked off to qualify as "this" or "that," it is more useful to conceive of it as a multifaceted continuum. Buddhism is historically, fundamentally, and ideologically a part of that continuum. If we remove the cultural aspects of both religions it is quite easy to see that Buddhism is based in Vedanta. The goal of both religions is the same. Hindus want to attain Moksha. Buddhist want to attain Nirvana. Same goal different paths, but the same can be said about the branches of yoga.
      One of the major conflicts would have to be the Hindu concept of Atman. Buddhism does not believe in an individual "soul" as Hinduism does. But Hinduism views the Atman as an expression of Brahman, this is clear. So ultimately what is given the name Atman is Brahman. Not so different from the Buddhist belief that there is no individual self.
      Another conflict would be the devotional disparity between the two. A misconception about Buddhism is that it is agnostic and/or nihilistic. That's just not true. Deities have always been a part of Buddhism. There was no renunciation of gods, but the idea that they are a part of cyclic existence as well, and not a means of salvation. This can seem in contrast to Hinduism but it is stated in the Vedas that one must go inward to see the "Self". This is enlightenment. This is Buddhism.
      The concept of detachment in Buddhism can seem like nihilism, but it is not. It's letting go of ego. Letting go of sensual experience as reality. Not being attached to what is not "real". These are all concepts of Hinduism as well. The beauty of both religions is that they are not dogmatic, but empirically flexible and all about understanding and gaining true wisdom. So wherever one's own philosophy falls it is important to remember that.

    • @sarahloffler1872
      @sarahloffler1872 4 роки тому

      Maryangela Neves, you see what you want to see.

    • @nomeshkumar6799
      @nomeshkumar6799 3 роки тому +4

      @S K my friend Hinduism is not a single philosphy like Buddhism,Sikkhism,Jainism,Christianity,Islam..
      It is collection of 1000s of philosphies..kindly correct your knowledge not every Hindu believes in so called 33 crore god's...more over..they are not 33 crore they are of 33 types and they are not god ..they are creation of God but superior to human..ok
      so moral of the comment is - think and research thrice before saying anything..

    • @human3213
      @human3213 3 роки тому

      Nomesh kumar
      There are no 33 gods

    • @guillermorelobalopez7553
      @guillermorelobalopez7553 2 роки тому

      @@nomeshkumar6799 How the hell are Islam, Buddhism or Christianity "single philosophies"? Wars have been fought and thousands upon thousands of people have died due to the schisms within Christianity alone. Think and research thrice before saying anything. You come off as a condescending butthole.

  • @xSirenityx
    @xSirenityx 6 років тому +174

    Buddhism is the religion of future according to Einstein. Both teachings are equally loved and cherished, to contribute to the wonderful eastern philosophy that has been an inspiration to millions ✨

    • @xSirenityx
      @xSirenityx 6 років тому +48

      Nobody has compared these two religions, they are both respected and loved. I put an actual statement Einstein has made. The origin of a name is irrelevant in this context. Please speak up only if you have something wise or positive to say, that can help us learn more. If not, no one cares.

    • @ROTHSTEIN01
      @ROTHSTEIN01 6 років тому +17

      Princess Sirenity what you mean by saying both religions are good?
      Hinduism is not a religion first of all
      It's a dharma unlike worshipping a single man in Hinduism you worship your idol
      And Hinduism created the Buddhism almost 90% of shits in Buddhism is same like Hinduism
      There is no difference literally

    • @xSirenityx
      @xSirenityx 6 років тому +36

      Using semantics to degrade a positive comment is not a valuable comment. Like I said, if you have nothing to contribute and help us to learn, you won't be taken seriously. What made you think I practice any religion? I love both of the teachings though, they help humanity to understand the roots of our existence and to heal many. I am sorry, but I am not interested in your competition mind set. So, good luck in your life and stay away from me

    • @surajpatil8670
      @surajpatil8670 6 років тому +6

      Interesting ! Although Einstein also believed in the establishment of a Socialist Economy to eliminate the grave evils of Capitalism. I couldn't disagree more

    • @dsbdsb6637
      @dsbdsb6637 6 років тому +3

      // Using semantics to degrade a positive comment is not a valuable comment. Like I said, if you have nothing to contribute and help us to learn, you won't be taken seriously. What made you think I practice any religion? I love both of the teachings though, they help humanity to understand the roots of our existence and to heal many. I am sorry, but I am not interested in your competition mind set. So, good luck in your life and stay away from me //
      The reason for such antagonism is because of the way History has been perpetuated & appropriated by different sections of society in India.
      See Indian scholars have appropriated the naming & comparisons systems introduced to them by colonizers which resulted in the comparison & competitive behavior forged from Western perspective. Then these same differences spilled over in various faction due to their politicization in modern India e.g. Neo-Buddhists {they believe in is because of Hinduism there is caste system & hence they want to destroy Hinduism for Annhiliation of caste}.
      Now to discuss caste issue i have created a reddit thread so check the issue there -
      reddit.com/r/AskHistorians/comments/8ck050/is_the_usage_of_term_caste_a_result_of/
      en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caste_system_in_India {You need basic understanding of this}
      en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dalit_Buddhist_movement {to understand Neo-Buddhist movement}
      en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hindutva {Counter religio-political nationalist movement}
      The result of Neo-Buddhist aka Dalit Buddhist Movement is that many people have forged counter Hindutva movement & they both see both these traditions from their own colored glasses & you have encountered one such individual above.

  • @ayushdeep8425
    @ayushdeep8425 6 років тому +114

    Hinduism is a tree with many branches and buddhism is one of it's branch ....as we know there were several buddhas before Gautam

    • @anniemaraj8773
      @anniemaraj8773 5 років тому +2

      True.

    • @swarabhaskar2160
      @swarabhaskar2160 5 років тому +2

      @@hackdaccount532 absolutely right

    • @hackdaccount532
      @hackdaccount532 5 років тому +3

      @@KshitijPatel. u r so dumb that u think castism is good.

    • @hackdaccount532
      @hackdaccount532 5 років тому +5

      @vaibhav gupta even hinduism says women menstruation impure.
      I don't need judgement of hinduism.

    • @hackdaccount532
      @hackdaccount532 5 років тому +5

      @vaibhav gupta it really doesn't matter what was at that time what was not.
      Because castism took birth by hinduism, castism is nothing but a disease. So leave hinduism leave superstitiouns.

  • @akhilkartha
    @akhilkartha 6 років тому +8

    Buddhism doesn't have casteism. That's a plus point.

    • @tejasvi18joshi
      @tejasvi18joshi 6 років тому +4

      tu amrica ya europe gaya waha tera sath dicrmination hua ktyki tu gora nahi hai to kya wo Christianity ka part hoga ya nahi. British ka Bharat me aake gencoide karna , lootna Christianity ka paert hai ya nahi.

    • @NitzVision
      @NitzVision 6 років тому +1

      Akhil Kartha ...himduism ..is BASIC while budhism ..is language ...if Yu understand software langue

  • @lunamartinezzz
    @lunamartinezzz 6 років тому +148

    I click fast because I’m afraid the vid is deleted😂

    • @Aerochalklate
      @Aerochalklate 6 років тому +2

      Luna Martínez this ain’t about drugs though

    • @lunamartinezzz
      @lunamartinezzz 6 років тому +6

      Aerochalklate I know but this month like four videos were deleted and I didn’t reached to see three of them:( (I think they were about meditation)

    • @sigaming7544
      @sigaming7544 6 років тому +3

      I know right so much have I missed because the video got deleted minutes later

    • @akashmandal5580
      @akashmandal5580 5 років тому +1

      😂😂😂😂😂😂

    • @himj7156
      @himj7156 5 років тому

      Luna Martínez why you thought this?

  • @TankforGod3
    @TankforGod3 6 років тому +63

    Koi, know this comment will get lost but I just wanted to say how blessed we are to have people like you. Thank you so much for passing on your knowledge.

  • @elungaspungas1169
    @elungaspungas1169 5 років тому +80

    With all respect to both Hinduism and Buddhism, I’ve seen people arguing how Hinduism isn’t a religion.. well as a Buddhist, Buddhism is not just a religion either it’s more of a prophecy.

    • @GreenCheese500
      @GreenCheese500 3 роки тому +27

      Actually Both of these Religions are way of life. The core rule is how to live a good life so that it can benefit you and the society.

    • @teallee7333
      @teallee7333 3 роки тому +1

      @@GreenCheese500 true that

    • @mybrotherinchrist5
      @mybrotherinchrist5 3 роки тому +2

      @@GreenCheese500 But still I would choose Hinduism over buddhism anyday. Why would I want to starve myself to death and cut myself off from all the pleasures of life.

    • @jjk_x_yt
      @jjk_x_yt 3 роки тому +5

      indian religions are not a real religion

    • @user-zx6rf1oz1b
      @user-zx6rf1oz1b 3 роки тому +3

      In Myanmar, Buddism is a religion and Buddha is God.

  • @unnabray
    @unnabray 6 років тому +230

    Is Vedanta part of Hinduism? I’m super interested in learning more about both Vedanta and Hinduism - do you have books to recommend to newbies? 🙏🏻✨ thank you

    • @rangilabetichodhapsipigemb6745
      @rangilabetichodhapsipigemb6745 6 років тому +108

      Brunna Daros yes dear Vedanta is the core belief of sanatan dharm.vedanta represents bhagawat geeta,108 Upanishads and brhamasanhita..I can recommend you to read the gospel of Sri Ramakrishna😍😍🙂🙂

    • @klassicp5033
      @klassicp5033 6 років тому +40

      Of course, Vedic Practises are literally Hindu Practises.

    • @otomackena7610
      @otomackena7610 6 років тому +29

      Brunna Daros Vedanta literally means Vedas (the core text of Hinduism/Sanatana Dharma).Its a Hindu philosophy, there are 6 orthodox schools of thought in Hinduism among that the one you are looking at is probably Advaita Vedanta

    • @jairosoft
      @jairosoft 6 років тому +18

      Vedanta is a set of Hindu "Bibles." Also refers to the sophisticated philosophy of Hinduism, divided into two flavors: dvaita and advaita, where "a" means "non" and dvaita means "dual" so advaita means non-dual. As for Vedanta, that comes from Veda. The Veda(s) are very old literature and the more recent of these are called Vedanta or the end of the Veda(s). Vedanta includes the Upanishads and the Bhagavad Gita. Then there are commentaries and great expounders such as Sankaracharya or Shankaracharya (alternate spelling). I came across a good book, I think it's called Essential Vedanta.

    • @shivadas7655
      @shivadas7655 6 років тому +11

      Brunna Daros yes!! The main philosophical & spiritual core of Advaita vedanta comes from The Upanishads. Great starter book! And everything book

  • @shivanihindu2081
    @shivanihindu2081 5 років тому +17

    Sikhism, buddism, Jainism, is part of hinduism vedic religion (sanatan Dharma)🕉🕉

    • @thehumblestudent5032
      @thehumblestudent5032 4 роки тому +2

      Wrong Guru Nanak Dev Ji the founder of Sikhism, rejected Hinduism and Islam. As stated in the Guru Granth Sahib. 'Na ham Hindu na Musalman". Translation: I am not a Hindu nor a Muslim Ang (page) 1136.

    • @shivanihindu2081
      @shivanihindu2081 4 роки тому +1

      @@thehumblestudent5032 Who was the first Sikh to become?

    • @thehumblestudent5032
      @thehumblestudent5032 4 роки тому

      @@shivanihindu2081 Bhai Mardana Ji (from muslim family). As stated in Sikh history he was the one that played the rabaab (instrument).

    • @shivanihindu2081
      @shivanihindu2081 4 роки тому +2

      @@thehumblestudent5032 सिख धर्म के प्रवर्तक प्रथम सचे पातशाह धन गुरु नानक देव जी थे ! वो एक हिन्दू माँ बाप की संतान थे उनका बचपन से ही दुनिया दारी में नही लगता था उस समय पंजाब में बहुत से पीर फ़क़ीर होते थे और उनके बहुत आए अनुयायी होते थे पीर फ़क़ीर जिस आश्रम में रहते थे उसको डेरा बोला जाता था गुरु नानक देव जी ने भी बहुत से चमत्कार दिखाये उन्होंने मुगल सम्राट बाबर का विरोध किया था और लोगो को जात , पात , छुआ छू त का विरोध किया लोगो को उसके बारे में जाग्रत किया वो हिन्दू और मुसलमान दोनों धर्मो की कुरीतियों का विरोध किया उन्होंने पूरे भारत मे ही नही बल्कि पूरे एशिया में यात्राएं की उनकी यात्राओं को उदासी कहते ह उनके बाद में गुरु शिष्य परम्परा के तहत उनकी गद्दी उनके शिष्यों ने संभाली उस समय मध्य एशिया ओर अफगानिस्तान से भारत बहुत आक्रमण हो रहे थे और वो पंजाब के रास्ते से ही होते थे इस लिए पंजाब का बहुत जोरो से इस्लामीकरण किया जा रहा था जिसका विरोध गुरुनानक के अनुयायी बहुत जोर शोर से विरोध करते थे इसी लिए सभी मुगल बादशाहों की सभी गुरुओ से अनबन रहती थी और गुरु अंगद देव गुरु तेग बहादुर गुरु अर्जुन देवजी पर मुगलो ने इस्लाम अपना ने के लिए बहुत अत्यचार किया था उनको जिंदा दीवार में चुनवादिया गुरु तेग बहादुर को तो गर्म तेल में जिंदा दाल दिया गया लेकिन गुरूओ ने कभी मुगलो की अधीनता स्वीकार नही की दशवे गुरु गोविंद सिंह जी ने पांच अलग अलग जातियों के हिन्दू शिष्यों को अमरत चखाकर प्रथम पांच सिख पंज प्यारे बना कर पांच निशान देकर खालसा दस्ते का घटन किया और उनको सिंह बनाया ओर मुगल बादशा ओरंगजेब से लड़ने के लिए अपनी सेना बनाई उनके आव्हान पर पूरा पंजाब जग गया उस समय प्रायः प्रायः सभी हिन्दू घरों से बड़े बेटे को गुरु को सौप दिया और गिरुजी ने उनको अमरत चखाकर सुद्द किया ( खालसा ) बनाय उनको खालसा के पांच निशान प्रदान कर गुरु की सेना बनाई और नया नारा दिया वाहे गुरुजी का खालसा वाहे गुरुजी की फतेह राज करेगा खालसा में चिड़िया संग बाज लड़ाऊँ सवालाख से एक लडाऊँ ता गरु गोविंद सिंह नाम कहा उ । उन्होंने अपने स्वनिको मे इतना जोश भरडिया की खालसा का मतलब ही सिंह होगया कमजोर हिन्दुओ में इतना जोश भरदिया की एक एक सैनिक दस दस मुगल सेनिको पर भारी पड़ने लगा और आज यदि पंजाब में हिन्दू बचे हुए ह तो सिर्फ गुरिओ के कारण ओर दशम गुरु मानवीय कमजोरियों को जानते थे इसलिए उन्होंने गुरु शिष्य परम्परा खत्म कर जो दस गुरुओं के जो उपदेश थे उनको संकलित करवाकर कर गुरुवाणी को गुरु ग्रन्थ साहिब का नाम देकर गुरु ग्रन्थ साहिब को ही गुरु की गद्दी पर स्थापित किया आज हर सिख गुरु ग्रन्थ साहेब को ही गुरु मानकर उसकी पूजा आराधना करते ह कालांतर में एहि खालसा पंथ सिख धर्म के नाम से जाना जाने लगा और फिर कुछ राजनीतिक नेताओ बे अपने व्यक्ति गत स्वार्थ के लिए सीखो ओर हिन्दुओ में फर्क करना सुरु करदिया वार्ना तो गुरुजो के समय कोई हिन्दू ओर खालसा अपने आपको अलग अलग नही समझते थे

    • @thehumblestudent5032
      @thehumblestudent5032 4 роки тому

      ​@@shivanihindu2081 Khalsa is to fight tyranny of all sorts, not particularly Mughals. All Sikhs are commanded to follow the Guru Granth Sahib which is the final Guru of the Sikhs. The word Sikhs is also mentioned in the Guru Granth Sahib. In Guru Granth Sahib Ji, which is the final Guru, clearly stated the following on ang (page 1136):
      I do not keep fasts, nor do I observe the month of Ramadaan.
      I serve only the One, who will protect me in the end.
      The One Lord, the Lord of the World, is my God Allah.
      He adminsters justice to both Hindus and Muslims.
      I DO NOT MAKE PILGRIMAGES TO MECCA, NOR DO I WORSHIP AT HINDU SACRED SHRINES.
      I serve the One Lord, and not any other.
      I do not perform Hindu worship services, nor do I offer the Muslim prayers.
      I have taken the One Formless Lord into my heart
      I humbly worship Him there.
      I am not a HINDU, nor am I a MUSLIM.
      Sikhs do consider themselves different from Hindus because our Guru, Guru Granth Sahib Ji says: "Na Ham Hindu Na Musalman". Translating: I am not a Hindu nor a Muslim. Going further if we study the texts of Bhai Gurdas which is big part of Sikh history. There are verses which clearly state that Guru Nanak Dev Ji started a NEW religion.

  • @avishkargiri4366
    @avishkargiri4366 6 років тому +124

    i from from nepal, i was born as hindu...the core of advaita vedanta is that "brahman only exists", everyone other than brahman is false.....mean to say that they don't exist by their own....they exist as a cause and effect.....when creation is needed, lord brahma is there.....in the absence of creation , lord brahma doesn't exist....when creation is there than only role of a vishu as preserver come into existence... like wise when destruction is needed, shiva exists....when there is heaven, hell must exist....in the absence of hell, heaven doesn't exist ......so the brahman is pure awareness, mass of consciousness, undivided essence that permeates all......i am brahman, you are brahman.....even you and i doesn't exist.....everything is void.... only brahman exist...
    here the statement "everything is void" is buddhism and the undivided essence(all is brahman) is hinduism....they are two faces of the same coin.... buddhism 100 % focuses on everything is impermanent and hence void in nature to realise that you are brahman.....hinduism 100 % focuses on implementing all (brahman is all) to realise the supreme truth "brahman"...but mind that Buddhism doesn't use word "brahman".....both are to realise the ultimate truth of the real nature....one(hinduism) starts from the state of soul and buddhism starts from the state of ego...thats all......i will pray to all please don't spread the hate message against any religion....all religion exist according to the need of the seekers....all are needed ....the ultimate is one .....in hinduism we talk about oneness because we start from the individual soul and seek for ultimate soul(undivided essence, absolute truth) for that we have to include all and every aspects of creation, in Christianity spirit makes a statement that there is only one absolute, oneness is not needed(jesus will take you there)....but all are pointing towards the same truth... according to karma people are drawn to certain type of spiritual method.....since brahman is all....please include and respect all.....namaste

    • @pia0591
      @pia0591 6 років тому +25

      I really like your message! Now I get a clearer view of how they both have really good and connected essence of teaching! I am born in a Buddhist family and a Buddhist myself but I love and believe in Hinduism too, and I think by learning from both I can gain more wisdom.. Namaste

    • @rangilabetichodhapsipigemb6745
      @rangilabetichodhapsipigemb6745 6 років тому +3

      Pia Pavita namaste 😍😍😍😍

    • @hsram1985
      @hsram1985 6 років тому +2

      Avishkar giri It goes deeper than that ...Good message ...
      but every religion is not same .. some mortals(like Jesus) dressed up as Gods in last 3500 yrs ,,Do buddists know / worship hindu gods ? No ..right ? Without hindu gods cosmos will goes back to singularity..
      Please stop saying like Jesus and lord Vishnu told the same to please someone... It won't work like that.
      As hindus respect budda as guru/tradition.. but budda was mortal (simple guru),, Mortals have no power ,, Hindus do not worship mortals..
      Budda made right hand Swastika a left hand ..He made Dharma a Dhamma ,Karma a kamma Why ?
      illusion(Maya) cannot point towards truth..

    • @reconquistahinduism346
      @reconquistahinduism346 6 років тому +6

      shriram hegde
      Most changes like the buddhist symbol etc were done by Ashoka and not by Buddha himself

    • @user-Void-Star
      @user-Void-Star 6 років тому +4

      avishkar giri
      I will tell you one thing you are wrong.

  • @shivadas7655
    @shivadas7655 6 років тому +113

    Beautiful as always. But buddhism does say that consciousness is real❤️💚💓

    • @DjDizzy216
      @DjDizzy216 6 років тому +11

      Right, I'm not sure why the video said universal consciousness doesn’t exist in Buddhism, in Buddhism the non-dual consciousness is referred to as “Buddha nature”. The Avatamsaka Sutra says that the Buddha body eternally fills all worlds and space, it is the spiritual force in all phenomena everywhere.

    • @shivadas7655
      @shivadas7655 6 років тому +3

      DjDizzy216 thank you i love you!!! ✨

    • @DjDizzy216
      @DjDizzy216 6 років тому +2

      Sending love back at you! 💖

    • @DjDizzy216
      @DjDizzy216 6 років тому +5

      Hustle Loy Due to my ignorance of Vedanta, I didn’t realize there was similarity to such an extent between Buddhism & Vedanta. What Vedanta-related reading would you recommend? I have the Upanishads & the Gita on my list to read. But if there’s anything else you might recommend. Thanks for the reply!

    • @hemant05
      @hemant05 6 років тому +2

      DjDizzy216 'yoga vasistha' is probably the best book on vedantic/non dual philosophy, it's an ancient scripture. you can find it on Amazon, also many people over years have written detailed reviews about it.

  • @surajsingh1161
    @surajsingh1161 6 років тому +130

    I'm a Hindu so it automatically make me a Buddhist, Jain and a Sikh .. because they're part of the same root!

    • @Ythishate
      @Ythishate 6 років тому +20

      Hindu is the name give to people of Sindhu region, all people in India are Hindus

    • @Suryapoosarla
      @Suryapoosarla 6 років тому +3

      gowtham i dont think so...dont beieving in god is quite acceptable in hinduism...buddhism, ajivika and jainism belong to nastika school of philosophy...

    • @Suryapoosarla
      @Suryapoosarla 6 років тому +4

      first of all ,all buddhist schools are not same...varna system is rejected by many hindu school also...remember he is a sanyasi how can a sanyasi have a varna...as far as i know most of teachings are nothing but derived from veda...what morals ram stood for is different from krishna...hinduism doesnot have rigid moral code....
      buddha advocated animal violence is not right and he is first one to say animal sacrifices are not the right way...later buddhist schools have their own interpretations...

    • @Suryapoosarla
      @Suryapoosarla 6 років тому +4

      buddha philosophy and path madhyamika, violence is unavoidable so dont overboard take middle path is his philosophy...mahaveer is heavy on non violence...eating food and wearing dress is violent because creation of something leads to destruction of other things which is violent was his philosophy...
      one answer one path is not way of hinduism...if that is the way tell we whether shavism,vaishavism or devi worshippers or advaith school..which school has right answer...hinduism answer there is one truth wise people many paths to reach that truth...hinduism is a pluralistic and tolerant religion....

    • @allahmotherfooker5593
      @allahmotherfooker5593 5 років тому

      @Gowtham it doesn't matter do you know about CHARVAKA which is a sect in Hinduism which means atheism

  • @kampagang9236
    @kampagang9236 6 років тому +91

    Both are Beautiful! But I prefer Buddhism. I love the teaching saying that don't attach to anything even God, Buddha himself and Our Self. It makes me feel free. No me, no you, just One.
    Oneness.
    Nirvana.

    • @niteshg9262
      @niteshg9262 6 років тому

      Lightworker Buddha's Child bro buddhism is a part of sanatan dharm

    • @believer1465
      @believer1465 5 років тому +9

      Nitesh G Hindu is a region not a religion.... Lot of people i think do not know that in the ancient india there were 2 main traditions ..1)vedic -which today so called hindusim is influenced by. ..and second is 2) Shramanic which included buddhism, jainism and both of these tradition were completely diffrent....infact buddha rejected the vedas because of its rituals animal sacrifice , caste system and heavily relying on gods
      Buddhism doesn't accept atma (self ) and is non theistic doesn't believe in creator god. .
      Infact the man shankaracharya who revived brahmanism is accused of being crypto buddhist by historians ..

    • @anniemaraj8773
      @anniemaraj8773 5 років тому +3

      @@believer1465 Vedas,Upanishads? you really dont understand what your talking about.The Gita? Krsna the supream personality that is source GOD!

    • @sachchidananddubey58
      @sachchidananddubey58 5 років тому +1

      @@believer1465 bro.. U didn't read bhagwata geeta.. Sanatan dharma..is.not as narrow. As. U think.. Bro..

    • @sachchidananddubey58
      @sachchidananddubey58 5 років тому

      Bhrahmin.. Sounds same.. 👍

  • @walkinloveonpurpose9496
    @walkinloveonpurpose9496 6 років тому +85

    I Love them both take what you need to make you a much better person 💖🙏Peace and Love beloved Souls 😍

  • @TJ11233
    @TJ11233 6 років тому +76

    I love being a Buddhist ..so Buddhism for me

    • @soulmechanics7946
      @soulmechanics7946 5 років тому +1

      I was married by a Buddhist monk.

    •  5 років тому +9

      Soul Mechanics u can’t marry monks!

    • @starrix4712
      @starrix4712 4 роки тому +1

      No haha, it’s like when someone says they were married by a priest, my parents had a monk too (although I suppose this was a joke that flew over my head)

    • @keshavsingh9148
      @keshavsingh9148 4 роки тому +3

      Sidharth was teaching what is in hinduism ..... He never made any religion his follower made it ...on his teaching .....

    • @June_815
      @June_815 4 роки тому +8

      @@keshavsingh9148 I think Buddhism should exist as a religion. At least the atheists have a official religion through buddhism now.
      Hinduism is for the believers of god.
      Buddhism is for both believers and non believers.

  • @maribelpabon8303
    @maribelpabon8303 6 років тому +79

    Beautiful . I practice Buddhism and you just reminding me why.

    • @tejasvi18joshi
      @tejasvi18joshi 6 років тому +5

      COPIED FROM JORDAN HUNT:
      The best way to understand the relationship between Hinduism and Buddhism is to first remove the label from what we now refer to as Hinduism.
      We lump this vast array of religious and philosophical constructs into one box and say, "it is this". But there is a subtlety that is lost when we think in this way.
      As apposed to thinking of Hinduism as this limited thing, with boxes to be checked off to qualify as "this" or "that," it is more useful to conceive of it as a multifaceted continuum. Buddhism is historically, fundamentally, and ideologically a part of that continuum. If we remove the cultural aspects of both religions it is quite easy to see that Buddhism is based in Vedanta. The goal of both religions is the same. Hindus want to attain Moksha. Buddhist want to attain Nirvana. Same goal different paths, but the same can be said about the branches of yoga.
      One of the major conflicts would have to be the Hindu concept of Atman. Buddhism does not believe in an individual "soul" as Hinduism does. But Hinduism views the Atman as an expression of Brahman, this is clear. So ultimately what is given the name Atman is Brahman. Not so different from the Buddhist belief that there is no individual self.
      Another conflict would be the devotional disparity between the two. A misconception about Buddhism is that it is agnostic and/or nihilistic. That's just not true. Deities have always been a part of Buddhism. There was no renunciation of gods, but the idea that they are a part of cyclic existence as well, and not a means of salvation. This can seem in contrast to Hinduism but it is stated in the Vedas that one must go inward to see the "Self". This is enlightenment. This is Buddhism.
      The concept of detachment in Buddhism can seem like nihilism, but it is not. It's letting go of ego. Letting go of sensual experience as reality. Not being attached to what is not "real". These are all concepts of Hinduism as well. The beauty of both religions is that they are not dogmatic, but empirically flexible and all about understanding and gaining true wisdom. So wherever one's own philosophy falls it is important to remember that.

  • @TheAltruismActivist
    @TheAltruismActivist 6 років тому +88

    You should do a video on Advaita Vedanta vs. the dualism that Prabhupada popularized!

    • @paragbhattacharya943
      @paragbhattacharya943 6 років тому +5

      TheAltruismActivist Prabhupada is the latest example.
      First proponent was Madhavacharya.
      See this vedio.Hope it will help.
      ua-cam.com/video/uCofNFj3e3I/v-deo.html

    • @shivadas7655
      @shivadas7655 6 років тому +1

      Great 😍😍

    • @TheAltruismActivist
      @TheAltruismActivist 6 років тому +1

      Parag Bhattacharya Thank you for sending that link. I watched it, and it was very informative!

    • @michaelfleetsimpson5878
      @michaelfleetsimpson5878 6 років тому +7

      I couldn't agree more! Advaita Vedanta and Krishna consciousness seem the most popular routes with western practitioners. They contradict oneanother greatly. Yet I for one am currently admist both practices and it seems the bridge is falling apart!

    • @tejasvi18joshi
      @tejasvi18joshi 6 років тому +4

      but both don't criticize each other and don't kill each other unlike shia sunni and catholic protestant. Adavaita vedanta is the real teachings of vedas and upnishads and greate Rishis. but dualist also in the end have to become oneness with Brahman if they have read GEETA.

  • @epifania6529
    @epifania6529 3 роки тому +18

    Hinduism and Buddhism just cannot be compared. BOTH ARE GOLD

  • @jordanhunt4788
    @jordanhunt4788 6 років тому +43

    The best way to understand the relationship between Hinduism and Buddhism is to first remove the label from what we now refer to as Hinduism.
    We lump this vast array of religious and philosophical constructs into one box and say, "it is this". But there is a subtlety that is lost when we think in this way.
    As apposed to thinking of Hinduism as this limited thing, with boxes to be checked off to qualify as this or that, it is more useful to conceive of it as a multifaceted continuum. Buddhism is historically, fundamentally, and ideologically a part of that continuum. The goal of both religions is the same. Hindus want to attain Moksha. Buddhist want to attain Nirvana. Same goal different paths, but the same can be said about the branches of yoga.
    One of the major conflicts would have to be the Hindu concept of Atman. Buddhism does not believe in an individual soul as Hinduism does. But Hinduism views the Atman as an expression of Brahman; this is clear. So ultimately what is given the name Atman is Brahman. Not so different from the Buddhist belief that there is no individual self.
    Another conflict would be the devotional disparity between the two. A misconception about Buddhism is that it is agnostic and/or nihilistic. That's just not true. Deities have always been a part of Buddhism. There was no renunciation of gods, but the idea that they are a part of cyclic existence as well, and not a means of salvation. This can seem in contrast to Hinduism but it is stated in the Vedas that one must go inward to see the "Self". That is enlightenment, just like Buddhism.
    The concept of detachment in Buddhism can seem like nihilism, but it is not. It's letting go of ego. Letting go of sensual experience as reality. Not being attached to what is not "real". These are all concepts of Hinduism as well.
    The beauty of both religions is that they are not dogmatic, but empirically flexible and all about understanding and gaining true wisdom. So wherever one's own philosophy falls it is important to remember that.

    • @prashanthmotadoo6084
      @prashanthmotadoo6084 6 років тому +11

      Very beautifully put. Much appreciations.

    • @anupampaul7342
      @anupampaul7342 6 років тому +6

      wow very elaborate 👍

    • @tstsdodo3662
      @tstsdodo3662 5 років тому +1

      I m sorry I m bhudhissm Hindu is greater than Buddhism because Buddhism is a ............... If u wants to dash then ask me at 959690 38111

    • @hackdaccount532
      @hackdaccount532 5 років тому +2

      Hindus have cast, women difference , no right for women, even cow is goddess but other animals are nothing.
      Hinduism is the most worst religion.
      But Buddhism is best.
      Buddhism is so good thats why hindus wanted Buddhism to be in hinduism but it can't, as there is jo place for gods in buddhism

    • @rahulreddy7513
      @rahulreddy7513 4 роки тому +3

      USUI MISAKHIl you know Buddha himself did not allow women into his group . Later he changed his mind . Just FYI ..

  • @AustinRan121
    @AustinRan121 6 років тому +45

    In thich nhat hanh's(a buddhist) book "The Other Shore" translation of the heart sutra he does explain an idea called "interbeing." Interbeing means that in a way we are connected to the whole universe; like a book requires trees, tree requires cloud, cloud requires water, and etc. Basically if you keep tracing these you will realize everthing is connected in a certain way. I feel like although they do not have the concept of brahman its a similar idea. "Everything is empty of a seperate self, but full of everything that allows them to be. "

    • @karan200590
      @karan200590 6 років тому +4

      hello austin, the thing u r talking about interbeing is from the avatamsaka sutra of mahayana buddhism that developed in india and went to east asia. that interbeingness is called INDRAJAAL or INDRA'S NET, indra being a hindu celestial god. the idea of INDRA'S NET is actually taken from the ATHARVA VEDA(approx 1000 BCE) where it was first mentioned.

    • @AustinRan121
      @AustinRan121 6 років тому +3

      god al hakanson for being a non dual philosophy you people arent always very accepting of other ways of looking at life.

    • @AustinRan121
      @AustinRan121 6 років тому +3

      Hustle Loy The comment was making it sound like "boobism" is wrong or bad for not having a diety. Im not saying christianity, or judaism are super great. But christianity and judaism arent pracitcing non duality, vedantists/hindus do practice non duality. So you would think the vedantists would realize that everyone is in their own place karmically and we are all working towards the same goal(self realization). Like sri ramakrishna's analogy. *At the base of the mountain there are many different paths(religions), but at at the top of the mountain you will realize all the paths lead to the the same place(oneness with ultimate reality/god head). So we need to realize that not everyone puts reality through the same filter and that buddhism, christianity, hinduism or any other religion are going to work work better for different people. So it does not make someone else wrong just because they do not see the world through your eyes.

    • @user-Void-Star
      @user-Void-Star 6 років тому +2

      Austin
      It's not connected it's dependent origination.

    • @DjDizzy216
      @DjDizzy216 6 років тому

      The interconnectness of all things. Like the Net of Indra

  • @onthematwithfeliciarodrigu2309
    @onthematwithfeliciarodrigu2309 6 років тому +76

    Both beautiful religions, I resonate with both for different reasons. I must say my favourite thing about religion is that you don’t have to follow one or the other, but you can take your favourite aspects of each that fit you to form your own beliefs 💕

    • @ntl9974
      @ntl9974 2 роки тому

      That just means you follow your whims
      Your religion is whims
      🤦‍♂️

    • @farazahmed7
      @farazahmed7 2 роки тому

      Both are stupidest releigion

  • @anobody8576
    @anobody8576 6 років тому +52

    They’re both very beautiful

    • @wuandondo4832
      @wuandondo4832 4 роки тому +8

      I agree. As a Buddhist, I do see Hinduism as the father of buddhism. All of these religions that came from Hinduism and including Hinduism have extremely similar beliefs. It’s just that there’s a different path for everyone. I love all of these religions!

    • @timothyfludd7218
      @timothyfludd7218 4 роки тому

      Jesus is the only way

    • @halo9431
      @halo9431 4 роки тому +8

      @@timothyfludd7218 Dude,can you respect other Religions,and how do you know Jesus is the right way, Hinduism is Older than Christianity,I'm not a Hindu but to be Honest Hinduism is Really Really Older than Christianity

    • @timothyfludd7218
      @timothyfludd7218 4 роки тому +1

      Dartrogon Buddha was not a good person

    • @halo9431
      @halo9431 3 роки тому +5

      @@timothyfludd7218 Yes he is, Christians never respect Other Religions,I'm not a Buddhist but That Doesnt mean Buddha is not a Good Person,Buddha is a Good Person,Show some Respect Will you

  • @melodicnostalgic3823
    @melodicnostalgic3823 6 років тому +29

    I'm Hindu with Buddhist name :D

  • @beenice9149
    @beenice9149 6 років тому +24

    I study all traditions but these two are my favorite.

  • @jairosoft
    @jairosoft 6 років тому +57

    Koi good overview, I generally agree with it all, but I would like to introduce an exception: Vajrayana Buddhism (also often identified as Tibetan Buddhism) for your consideration, and I hope you will find it quite colorful. And Buddhism in China is also quite colorful, and full of devotion comparable to a Bakti yoga but applied to Buddha Amitabha. And in Vajrayana there is guru devotion, with the word guru translated to Tibetan as Lama.

    • @karan200590
      @karan200590 5 років тому +8

      buddhism originally was theravada buddhism. over time it assimalated different hindu concepts like bhakti, visualization meditation and tantric practices from hinduism. in that way buddhism in india became much like hinduism. later those spread to tibet and china.

    • @albagarrido879
      @albagarrido879 5 років тому +6

      He is talking about Theravada Buddhism which is the root of Buddhism, praying or devotion wasn't accepted by the Buddha, however other branches of Buddhism like in China or Tibet, they do pray and believe in deities.

    • @shashwatdev2371
      @shashwatdev2371 3 роки тому +1

      But this is no way in comparison to colors of Hinduism. Be it holi, Diwali, Durga, Ganesh puja etc.

  • @sahibaat__1990
    @sahibaat__1990 6 років тому +95

    gautama buddha was also a hindu by birth.. but after he attained enlightenment.. buddhism came into existence..

    • @reconquistahinduism346
      @reconquistahinduism346 6 років тому +2

      Mr Kamina
      True. But enlightenment more in subjective sense

    • @sahibaat__1990
      @sahibaat__1990 6 років тому +7

      Gowtham Bymana you are really a ignorant idiot..

    • @sahibaat__1990
      @sahibaat__1990 6 років тому +4

      Gowtham Bymana knowledge is limited by mind.. but enlightment is beyond mind.. meditation is the only way to attain enlightment

    • @sahibaat__1990
      @sahibaat__1990 6 років тому +5

      Gowtham Bymana stop judging and find the truth by yourself.. dont believe in anybody's belief

    • @sahibaat__1990
      @sahibaat__1990 6 років тому +1

      Gowtham Bymana lol what did you find..?? did you found out the no mind state?? have you been to the thoughtless state ever??

  • @littlemixsbaby8928
    @littlemixsbaby8928 4 роки тому +16

    I'm a muslim and i went to both buddhism temple and hinduism temple and i am in love with both! The buddhsim one was peaceful and calm while the hindu one was colorful and amazing

  • @sns8420
    @sns8420 5 років тому +15

    Buddhism - if there is no soul, then what reincarnates

    • @jays5186
      @jays5186 4 роки тому

      It's like a computer game, any enemy is killed, it spawns elsewhere...so memory, energy etc..Hindus use the same logic, they call the transfer package as a soul

    • @sns8420
      @sns8420 3 роки тому

      @Be Happy Then what did the Dalai Lama remember

    • @sns8420
      @sns8420 3 роки тому

      @Be Happy You are too dense for me to interact with - Goodbye

    • @m.u.munaweera2654
      @m.u.munaweera2654 3 роки тому +2

      Buddha debunked the stupid concept of brahma and athma in hinduism. 🤣
      Hinduism is just a baby in comparing with Buddisum. 🤣

    • @mybrotherinchrist5
      @mybrotherinchrist5 3 роки тому +1

      @@m.u.munaweera2654 How did he debunk will you explain? Also Total hindus in world> Total Buddhists.

  • @MrYatesj1
    @MrYatesj1 6 років тому +119

    Sadhguru said that Siddhartha Gautama focused on 1 of the 112 ways Shiva explored.

    • @ajinkyadeshmukh8591
      @ajinkyadeshmukh8591 6 років тому +15

      he is right.....but sadhguru borrowed thise word from early masters....
      gautama's technique is based on 1 techniques by Shiva (actually its half of first technique .....the other half(gap in between) isn't mentioned by buddha it just automatically follows

    • @ajinkyadeshmukh8591
      @ajinkyadeshmukh8591 6 років тому +8

      enigma you could be right but in this context he is talking about the Buddhist meditation technique in (anapansati) which is half of the 1st technique shiva taught in conversation with Parvati ...based on vigyan Bhairava tantra which are 112 in number(Buddhist too claim this book as part as Buddhism)....so he was talking about the meditation techniques,from point of rajyoga.....you can clearly see SG isn't really much into other stuff that deeply , though he uses little of tantra,janana and bhakti...he kind of Focuses deeply on dhyana....

    • @ajinkyadeshmukh8591
      @ajinkyadeshmukh8591 6 років тому +5

      enigma I am no way proSG(actually little anti-- because much is borrowed without crediting the sources and those were talking about dhyana like Osho) I have just started reading about Buddhism (I read Buddha though but not Buddhism except for basics like noble truths and a meditation technique) like few days ago.....but sources like Osho say that Buddhist meditation techniques are limited and included in Bhairav tantra(Osho wasn't exactly Hindu..he kind of hated it..... though he did explain vigyan Bhairava tantra denying shiva has anything to do with Hinduism or Buddhism).... Osho could be very wrong ....but Sadguru actually quotes people like Osho 90% of his time including his inconic lines but people fail to realise it because they aren't really aware of it
      Just a question.. wasn't Buddha kind of anti bhakti ,he opposed bhakti rituals,prayers,scarifices and I also Buddha designed his own middle path and Buddhism doesn't have concept of inclusiveness of other possible paths than what Buddha taught like it is with Hinduism or Jainism (anektavada)??

    • @ankurprakash2244
      @ankurprakash2244 6 років тому +3

      enigma thanks for explaining man , very depth insight of Buddhism. Sg has good knowledge but he did not understood Buddhism fully.

    • @tejasvi18joshi
      @tejasvi18joshi 6 років тому +6

      Gautama Buddha Guru was Kapila , Rishi Kapila comes from atheist Branch of Vedas. They regard Vedas but reject any existence of divine. and more focus was on Upnishads. Buddha or Buddhism base is Upnishads. though in the long run whether it is Buddha, tripatak, Vedas, Upanishads, sects, Jainism, PUranas, different darshanas , etc etc etc , their ultimate goal is to prepare humans to see inside or inner or self realization/awakening . that's why in Indic system atheists, theist, agnostic, materialists etc don't matter because ultimate goal is self realization. while abrahmic religion are based on outer world or some super natural or angry god commandments to convert all the world into their religion. and History is evident, Christians and Muslims have wiped out civilizations after civilization and cultures after cultures.

  • @veeras1162
    @veeras1162 6 років тому +5

    Buddhism is best
    buddha.dhamma means.law of nature.
    Buddhism is based on nature.

  • @markobrenchuk9947
    @markobrenchuk9947 6 років тому +15

    Biddhism has two aspects: compassion to all living beings and wisdom about illusion of "I".
    But you said that buddhism tells to live only with compassion i think this is half true.

    • @VishuddhaDas
      @VishuddhaDas  6 років тому +5

      lalitananda Dvedasha yeah couldn't fit it all in one video! Thank you :)

    • @prashanthmotadoo6084
      @prashanthmotadoo6084 6 років тому

      Hustle Loy, Rahul M has his own style. Let him present his side in his own way and you present yours in your own way. It is very Abrahamic if one believes there is a right way or a wrong way ain't it?

  • @deepeshkouravarmylover7
    @deepeshkouravarmylover7 Місяць тому +1

    हर एक व्यक्ति को धर्म से जुड़ना चाहिए बिना धर्म के व्यक्ति कुछ नहीं है 🚩

  • @CPSFC
    @CPSFC 6 років тому +18

    Anatta is not "no-soul" it is "not-self" where the Buddha points out things like thoughts and emotions aren't who we are, also you mention about not believing in infinite consciousness but isn't our "Buddha Nature" effectively that consciousness/ awareness/ presence that is inherent with everyone? Also your videos are great usually but did feel you were slightly pushing the Hindu views Here, which I don't think is ideal In a comparison video

    • @VishuddhaDas
      @VishuddhaDas  6 років тому +6

      By no self they mean no soul as well. :) Just Google anatta and it explains it right away :) the belief in a non self is the belief in there being no infinite essence of consciousness or soul.

    • @CPSFC
      @CPSFC 6 років тому +7

      Koi Fresco *Vishuddha Das* I just think this is the huge misunderstanding of Buddhism, otherwise how would you describe Nirvana- that is the eternal presence, our true nature?

    • @CPSFC
      @CPSFC 6 років тому +1

      Koi Fresco *Vishuddha Das* essenceofbuddhism.wordpress.com/the-ephemeral-vs-the-eternal/ and essenceofbuddhism.wordpress.com/2013/07/12/the-confusion-over-the-self-in-modern-buddhism/ these 2 articles summarise these better than I ever could, keep up with the great videos:)

    • @markbro4916
      @markbro4916 6 років тому +2

      Koi Fresco *Vishuddha Das* by existence of soul or infinite consciousness your feeding an ego, and existence in its highest form has no self, or I or a concept of a hive mind entity. You just can't comprehend Anatta's true meaning at the highest point. Saying something is one or is one is creating a distinct self that is an extreme to none existence (void emptiness) you have to bypass these extremes of oneness, of void (nothingness) to understand the nature of Anatta. 🤔

    • @starrix4712
      @starrix4712 5 років тому

      ^ How do you know existence is emptiness? To me emptiness is a pretty dual and limited concept in itself anyway, whether it does turn out to be true or not - either way you cannot slam that down with certainty.

  • @letsmakeit9710
    @letsmakeit9710 6 років тому +5

    Please don't try to connect Buddhism to hinduism. Because it have major difference between them, gautama left hindu because hinduism have many incomplete think that buddha try to complete but he proposed new religion so. Lot of think that not related to real life is mentioned in hinduism which is totally wasted. But Buddha want to improve it in Buddhism so thats why Buddhism is totally different from hinduism which not really accepted

  • @judith7753
    @judith7753 6 років тому +6

    Beautiful summary :) Tibetan Buddhism is a quite old mix of Buddhism and Tantric Traditions by the way. Super interesting

  • @angryindiancritic9989
    @angryindiancritic9989 5 років тому +34

    I'm Hindu but I'm interested in Buddhism for getting my experience in different religion I love Hinduism which I got as an inheritance but I want to explore more religion to find which religion suits me most and I think Buddhism could be the one that'll help me reach enlightment

    • @smitparmar2136
      @smitparmar2136 3 роки тому

      Brother i am same but naturally i am lean on Sikhism it's talk about knowledge. Don't bound to religion just learn man this is just my style.

    • @ussinussinongawd516
      @ussinussinongawd516 3 роки тому

      @@smitparmar2136 yes i like sikhism its a cool philosophy but im not punjabi so i never got into it too far

    • @JayPatel-fo4ss
      @JayPatel-fo4ss 2 роки тому +1

      These are fruits of the same tree, they just appear in different shades of colour. Some like the sweet taste of the ripe fruit while others prefer a bit of tange of sourness. These preferences change as one grows gravitating towards the sweeter taste. That's all it is. So don't fight with one another as to which is better in taste. It is essentially a personal choice.

    • @rockwithsable
      @rockwithsable 2 роки тому

      Go to Vipassana...it is for all and free. True religion has no monopoly... It is for all human being.

    • @andrewandrew1875
      @andrewandrew1875 2 роки тому

      @@smitparmar2136 Are you from Punjab India

  •  6 років тому +18

    Thank you for this video, please talk more about Hinduism in the future. 💫🕊🙏🏼

    •  6 років тому +1

      ek it’s a Swedish letter pronounced almost like the “ea” in earl grey :)

  • @evamichaels5725
    @evamichaels5725 2 роки тому +3

    Shukria 🙏 ji. I've been waiting 2 years to take Sanyasi in India. I've tried to go to temples in U.S. but they always want 50$-200$ just for morning Puja. I just moved next door to a Buddhist temple and learning to switch over from Hinduism..but my am puja to deities is so deep in my heart. I can't live without my Ganepatye and Siva. But God is steering me into Buddhism now. 🙏🙏 Om namah Shivaya. Ji . Thanks for all your videos Ji🙏🙏🙏❤️

  • @callen607
    @callen607 6 років тому +7

    Thank you so much for this video! I was really confused on the differences for a long time and this layed it all out really well💗

  • @abdulshaikh1044
    @abdulshaikh1044 3 роки тому +21

    I am Muslims but respect for Hinduism..🕉️💓☪️

  • @juicyjesstv
    @juicyjesstv 4 роки тому +21

    Man, the more I dive into myself, the more I naturally come upon Hindu beliefs. I was contacted by a Hindu goddess years ago and since then I have on an off explored my spirituality. Recently this year Ive really gone deep and so much Hindu teaching is already in me. As I am learning about Hinduism, I am getting more confirmation than knowledge, though of course, there is still knowledge. I am very close to fully dedicating myself to this spiritual path. I am still on a couple of other paths alongside Hinduism but I agree with your other video about choosing one path to follow and really master.

    • @sd64375
      @sd64375 2 роки тому

      Can you share your experience??

    • @somitshukla8321
      @somitshukla8321 Рік тому

      You should watch Vishnu Purana, Ramayana and Mahabharata episode in UA-cam

  • @sundarkanya1602
    @sundarkanya1602 2 роки тому +3

    All 4 are ours 🥰🥰🥰

  • @amiyamondal1517
    @amiyamondal1517 4 роки тому +5

    Hindusim is great.🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳💖💖💖💖💖💖💖💖💖💖💖💖💖

    • @m.u.munaweera2654
      @m.u.munaweera2654 3 роки тому

      Buddisum is the only truth. Hinduism is just a baby in comparing with Buddisum. 🤣

    • @Aikadiwana
      @Aikadiwana 2 роки тому

      @@vikasthakur436 in your dreams

    • @Prabhas__abhimani09
      @Prabhas__abhimani09 Рік тому

      @@m.u.munaweera2654 buddhism is fake buddha is worst hinduims is truth buddhism 😂😂😂😂

  • @jeremym1706
    @jeremym1706 6 років тому +37

    Ram Ram❤❤

    • @bbbc6698
      @bbbc6698 4 роки тому +1

      Ha ha ha.
      Kalpnik ram

  • @kieran1670
    @kieran1670 6 років тому +41

    I've found the Nobel 8 fold path and the practice of Yoga to quite similar. Yoga puts forth all the right actions and selfless service for the benefit of all others similar to 8 fold path
    In fact, reading the Bagavad Gita made me feel as if I was reading Buddhist texts! The two religions are so strikingly close. Buddhism just has a straight forward scientific method for reaching enlightenment, whereas Hinduism is more sportatic and multifaceted with Bahkti, raja, karama yoga etc. In the end of the day, both paths lead to better human beings and a more connected spirit and thats all that really matters hey :)

    • @Ankita-vr8ri
      @Ankita-vr8ri 3 роки тому

      you should try reading the rigveda as well buddha completely rejected it as it same goes with jainism

    • @MrZenGuitarist
      @MrZenGuitarist 3 роки тому +3

      I feel the same way....and it isn't very strange at all. Regardless of whether Buddha actually really intended to "invent" a new religion, or not - he did non the less start a sort of protest movement against elements within the contemporary Vedic religion that he saw as corrupt or downright evil, such as the caste-system, the hereditary brahmin-system, animal-sacrifice, superstitious beliefs and practices etc., etc...but he did still come from that same culture and background.
      And so he started to promote the ideas that he found within the Upanishads (and perhaps also other at that time new and more or less "revolutionary" texts) together with what he found out through his own experiences and revelations. And as far as I know the more modern Hinduism that we are familiar with today also started to grow out of texts such as the Upanishads. Also, as we can clearly see for ourselves in for ex. the Yoga-Sutras - Buddhism and the more modern Hinduism must have been cross-pollinating each other for a long time, if not even millennia.
      Just look at the "Noble Eightfold Path" and the "Ashta-anga (Eight Limbed) Yoga" found within the Yoga Sutras for ex. Or the Ethics found in both traditions - they are literally the same.
      So, to me both Buddhism and at least the practice (or Yoga) of Hinduism are both clearly what I would call "Yogic" traditions. Since both are centered upon the practice of meditation and ethics to help pierce the veil of Maya and thus gain supreme knowledge of the Real, and achieve Nirvana/Moksha - or Liberation!
      Though, if I would mention one thing that I believe separate them - in a way that I believe is probably irreconcilable. It would be that Buddhism doesn't believe in an eternal, unchanging soul, so that you in Buddhism have what they call Anatman (Not-Self), instead of Atman. And I believe that this, which makes up one of the three so called 'Marks of Existence', which is "Dukkha, Anicca and Anatman" - or "Suffering/Unsatisfactorines and Not-Self", which they in Buddhism see as being the Ultimate Truth of Existence, ultimately sets Buddhism apart from Hinduism.
      That and that there is no God(s) within Buddhism, at least not any that meddle in human affairs and thus are worthy of worship and/or can help you achieve Nirvana - but that that is a prospect solely up to you alone!
      So, while both paths are in many ways similar in the sense that they are both yogic traditions with similar practices and are both oriented towards Ultimate Liberation, or Nirvana/Moksha - Buddhism is, in contrast to Hinduism a non-Theistic tradition.
      At least that's my take on it.
      Either way, I also find it useful to kind of "cherry-pick" from both traditions. For example, even though I'ld say that Theravada-Buddhism probably is the one tradition that lay closest to my heart, I also make use of certain meditation-techniques found in the Vajra-yana tradition. And, apart from that I also like to make use of several elements found within the Hindu Yoga tradition, such as Prana-yama, Dharana, Trataka as well as some Asanas, to make myself more flexible so that I can sit more comfortably for longer periods of time.
      Anyway, I would like to thank India and I humbly bow down to the timeless sages for all the wisdom they have found and shared with the rest of the world.
      I hope with all my heart that I one day will afford to visit the land of all the timeless wisdom - India.
      Namaste.

    • @human3213
      @human3213 3 роки тому +4

      Ankita alisha
      Nice joke
      But buddha never rejected it
      Nor did he create a religion
      He only tried to create a philosophy from
      The existing source material
      Aka the vedas

    • @anmolmonga1933
      @anmolmonga1933 3 роки тому

      Modern Hinduism evolved from shramana tradition exactly like Buddhism with a sprinkling of the previous ritualism.

    • @thevedic7362
      @thevedic7362 3 роки тому

      @@anmolmonga1933 wrong 🤣
      Jainism mention hindu gods
      .
      But they create own story
      Rama is warriors they make rama as monk in his scripture 🤣
      .
      .
      Fake cult

  • @crazypyrokitty
    @crazypyrokitty 3 роки тому +12

    So glad I finally am on the part of my path I found this channel! I don't know if you see comments on old videos but not only have you helped to increase my spiritual education, but brought it back to my attention as well 💜🕉️

    • @farazahmed7
      @farazahmed7 2 роки тому

      This is all bullshit. Islam is the only true religion

  • @maimohamed3590
    @maimohamed3590 6 років тому +63

    Yeah very good topic, thank you😘😘

    • @rangilabetichodhapsipigemb6745
      @rangilabetichodhapsipigemb6745 6 років тому +2

      Mai Mohamed are you a muslim 😍😎😎

    • @TusharKumar-mj9fz
      @TusharKumar-mj9fz 5 років тому +1

      @Death to Jewmerica & IsraHell! bro what do you want you are everywhere in comment section spreading hate towards sanatan,better you live on your own and figure thinks out cuz you are in a deep deep trouble man we got nothing to do with you. From your name i assume you are a muslim so don't let him down or just hit up a psychologist..peace 🇵🇰🇮🇳

    • @hyperoid3901
      @hyperoid3901 4 роки тому

      @@TusharKumar-mj9fzDon't worry, he is an incel

  • @crazyboysgroup5655
    @crazyboysgroup5655 Рік тому +4

    Jai Shree ram🙏🚩

  • @Fantomajay
    @Fantomajay Рік тому +2

    No comparison budhha also an avatar of lord Vishnu ❤️ Buddhism and Hinduism route connect at one point 🕉️❤️☸️

  • @Tridib_Tinkel
    @Tridib_Tinkel 6 років тому +12

    Buddhism vs Hinduism explained well by Alan Watts

    • @dr.harshitjain6410
      @dr.harshitjain6410 3 роки тому

      "Vs" exist only in the eyes of materialistic eyes. When one becomes spiritual, "vs" desolves and their is no duality left.

  • @divercity4045
    @divercity4045 6 років тому +4

    Just making breakfast and have really thoroughly enjoyed watching your video, I LOVE your channel and with having recently come into Buddhism I’ve learnt a lot and just how amazing this way of life is. Thank you x

  • @dmtdreamz7706
    @dmtdreamz7706 11 місяців тому +1

    There was a waterfall near us, such a lovely thin streak of water, like a thread but white and moving. It fell from a great height, but it looked quite low, and it was half a mile away, though it did not seem fifty paces. I loved to listen to it at night, but it was then that I became so restless. Sometimes I went and climbed the mountain and stood there in the midst of the tall pines, all alone in the terrible silence, with our little village in the distance, and the sky so blue, and the sun so bright, and an old ruined castle on the mountain-side, far away. I used to watch the line where earth and sky met, and longed to go and seek there the key of all mysteries, thinking that I might find there a new life, perhaps some great city where life should be grander and richer--and then it struck me that life may be grand enough even in a prison.

  • @kc2823
    @kc2823 6 років тому +11

    Koi: I appreciate the way you discuss Hinduism and Buddism with such clarity. You provide a really comprehensive introduction. You're one of the few 'youtubers' (urgh, I hate that word!) who is genuinely engaging and articulate.

  • @amfrws716
    @amfrws716 6 років тому +3

    Budhism is only one Tradion grew out of Santana Hindu Dharma.

  • @romainvicta9793
    @romainvicta9793 6 років тому +15

    To my understanding, a few major differences are Hinduism has a self/soul, Buddhism does not. Hinduism has God, Buddhism does not. Hinduism has no known founder, Buddhism was founded by Gautama Buddha.
    But I sometimes see Buddhism as a part of Hinduism.

    • @MrYatesj1
      @MrYatesj1 6 років тому

      Shiva?

    • @tejasvi18joshi
      @tejasvi18joshi 6 років тому +1

      no god in Hinduism. In fact god is irrelevant in all the ancient Indian religions.

    • @sk-lh7tz
      @sk-lh7tz 5 років тому

      Jess Yates he was the one who gave yoga most probably vishnu 1st avatar as wish millions of years ago will be the starting point

    • @pruthuviakalanka1541
      @pruthuviakalanka1541 5 років тому

      it was not founded it was reveal by BUDDHA

    • @malhaarsinha
      @malhaarsinha 4 роки тому +1

      Yes, It is

  • @Jacklloydmusic
    @Jacklloydmusic 5 років тому +2

    Being a good person is a by-product of your meditation practise in Buddhism, The Buddha taught vipassana which is understanding the main cause of suffering on a scientific level and how to eradicate it

  • @superficiallysteph8759
    @superficiallysteph8759 6 років тому +22

    Buddhism resonates with me more but I want to try out Hinduism too

    • @Mahesh-rb8xf
      @Mahesh-rb8xf 6 років тому +13

      Buddhism only explorers one aspect of Great Grand Santana Dharma (Hinduism).

    • @susiebella5434
      @susiebella5434 6 років тому +7

      +अक्षय Buddhism doesn't promote or ask anyone to join or convince anyone to believe they are the best like Hinduism do. Buddhism lives peacefully. So therefore Buddhism is similarity to God more than any religion to me :)

    • @Mahesh-rb8xf
      @Mahesh-rb8xf 6 років тому +1

      Susie Bella
      May you realize your true self in this very human life. ☺️

    • @Mahesh-rb8xf
      @Mahesh-rb8xf 6 років тому +2

      Hustle Loy
      Yes! Every Dharmic enlightened Guru teaches same Dharma in his own little different way.
      Doesn't mean you make a different religion out of it.
      Buddha just became more famous that's all, else there is no difference in him and or any other Dharmic guru.
      There is no real difference b/w Buddhism and Father of all religions Sanatana Dharma (hinduism).

    • @Mahesh-rb8xf
      @Mahesh-rb8xf 6 років тому +3

      Hustle Loy ua-cam.com/video/GPINIZmQDwI/v-deo.html
      Yea! Bhudda's way is very straight to the point and practical but lacks depth.
      Krishna & Adiyogi did not leave any aspect or color of the universe unexplored.
      Rituals were and still are very practical, if done right.. jaati system is debatable. ☺️
      Krishna aslo tried to establish Dharma correctly but Men of this continent were always HardNuts.

  • @scottphipps3577
    @scottphipps3577 2 роки тому +8

    Thanks for this video. Exactly what I needed to see. Think I am going to look into Hinduism some more.

    • @Kakashihatake-uo6ou
      @Kakashihatake-uo6ou 2 роки тому

      Start with Vedanta...you will find real philosophy instead of worshipping idols.

  • @AkkshayMeshram
    @AkkshayMeshram 6 років тому +12

    Nice. 🌸🌸RAM RAM🌸🌸

  • @ademiranda2
    @ademiranda2 Рік тому +2

    I think both philosophies are beautiful. I am currently studying the Bhagavad Gita on YT. I am so intrigued by it. When it comes to Buddhism, I like Zen...with it's simplistic, very minimalistic approach.

    • @vedicarya7
      @vedicarya7 Рік тому +2

      You must understand Upanishads before stepping on geetas and bhagwat geeta is not bible of Hinduism it is just one of the 60+ miraculous Geetas

  • @akashajbrown7507
    @akashajbrown7507 6 років тому +21

    This video was very helpful for me and made me realize I actually identify more with Hinduism than Buddhism. I’ve been watching your videos for a couple weeks now and would just like to thank you so much for helping me on my spiritual journey! Sending love and light your way🧡💕✨

    • @tejasvi18joshi
      @tejasvi18joshi 6 років тому +1

      COPIED FROM JORDAN HUNT:
      The best way to understand the relationship between Hinduism and Buddhism is to first remove the label from what we now refer to as Hinduism.
      We lump this vast array of religious and philosophical constructs into one box and say, "it is this". But there is a subtlety that is lost when we think in this way.
      As apposed to thinking of Hinduism as this limited thing, with boxes to be checked off to qualify as "this" or "that," it is more useful to conceive of it as a multifaceted continuum. Buddhism is historically, fundamentally, and ideologically a part of that continuum. If we remove the cultural aspects of both religions it is quite easy to see that Buddhism is based in Vedanta. The goal of both religions is the same. Hindus want to attain Moksha. Buddhist want to attain Nirvana. Same goal different paths, but the same can be said about the branches of yoga.
      One of the major conflicts would have to be the Hindu concept of Atman. Buddhism does not believe in an individual "soul" as Hinduism does. But Hinduism views the Atman as an expression of Brahman, this is clear. So ultimately what is given the name Atman is Brahman. Not so different from the Buddhist belief that there is no individual self.
      Another conflict would be the devotional disparity between the two. A misconception about Buddhism is that it is agnostic and/or nihilistic. That's just not true. Deities have always been a part of Buddhism. There was no renunciation of gods, but the idea that they are a part of cyclic existence as well, and not a means of salvation. This can seem in contrast to Hinduism but it is stated in the Vedas that one must go inward to see the "Self". This is enlightenment. This is Buddhism.
      The concept of detachment in Buddhism can seem like nihilism, but it is not. It's letting go of ego. Letting go of sensual experience as reality. Not being attached to what is not "real". These are all concepts of Hinduism as well. The beauty of both religions is that they are not dogmatic, but empirically flexible and all about understanding and gaining true wisdom. So wherever one's own philosophy falls it is important to remember that.

    • @hyperoid3901
      @hyperoid3901 5 років тому

      Jai Shree ram

    • @hyperoid3901
      @hyperoid3901 4 роки тому

      @Arkadip Mondal Who asked? Jai Shree Ram

  • @marsalien1339
    @marsalien1339 2 роки тому +3

    Hindusium is more powerful

  • @pathezs7971
    @pathezs7971 3 роки тому +4

    im hindu from malaysia i have many Chinese friends that who follows buddism

  • @kingmir5
    @kingmir5 6 років тому +2

    Buddhism is more practical and it makes more sense, the Buddha knew Hinduism was iffy, if not he woulda stayed to be the king and rule over a lot of Hindus but he knew something was wrong with that way of life. He did practice it before under great Hindu teachers

    • @kingmir5
      @kingmir5 6 років тому +2

      Hᴜꜱᴛʟᴇ Lᴏʏ I heard there were other Buddha’s and there is suppose to be a future Buddha but gotama is the only once since his time so I’m just Referencing his life and teaches but I believe gotama was more and advanced and knowledgeable than the Hindus . He didn’t believe in the caste system

    • @Aikadiwana
      @Aikadiwana 2 роки тому

      In ancient india hinduism was religion of elites and buddhism of low paid labourers(except few)

  • @rakeshbarman3486
    @rakeshbarman3486 Рік тому +1

    I'm hindu but most or all hindus go to Buddhist, sikh and jain temple to Pray 🙏 cuz its is closer to Hinduism, as all these philosophies branch out of hinduism , in many Asian countries you'll see hinduism and Buddhism intertwined in their culture, infact in Hinduism too there are different philosophies called Darshanas ,in which there are atheistic or materialistic philosophies

  • @TheAltruismActivist
    @TheAltruismActivist 6 років тому +20

    Describe Buddhist reincarnation under the anatta principle please (the buddha chose not to speculate on metaphysical issues for their irrelevance)!

    • @DjDizzy216
      @DjDizzy216 6 років тому +3

      TheAltruismActivist Trongpa Rinpoche said it’s our neuroses, the clinging/attachment/desire that gets reincarnated. It’s like a potential with karmic momentum behind it that ripples through time in different incarnations. When you are liberated you leave attachment behind, then there is nothing to reincarnate. Nibbana. Some people get the wrong idea of "no self"... there is no self meaning you doesn’t exist independently, you exist in dependence of everything else. Google the “net of Indra” to get a visual idea of what Buddhism means by that.

  • @NikhchansGaming
    @NikhchansGaming 4 роки тому +23

    Buddhism is ONE ASPECT of HINDUISM, MARKETED very well.

    • @sanatani1194
      @sanatani1194 4 роки тому +5

      So true

    • @supersaiyangod3361
      @supersaiyangod3361 3 роки тому

      Buddhism is hinduism without the dogma

    • @NikhchansGaming
      @NikhchansGaming 3 роки тому

      @@supersaiyangod3361 What Dog? ma?

    • @supersaiyangod3361
      @supersaiyangod3361 3 роки тому

      @@NikhchansGaming dealing with gods

    • @NikhchansGaming
      @NikhchansGaming 3 роки тому +2

      @@supersaiyangod3361 How does it append dogma on you? You're bound by karma...time...even god can't interfere in that. God can only unbind you from the cycle of rebirth.

  • @xXskyanethiaXx
    @xXskyanethiaXx 6 років тому +2

    Another important difference: Buddha left Hinduism, because he did not believe in the caste system. He believed that anyone can become enlightened, no matter which caste they are in and no matter what their past lives were. I make no opinion on the subject, however, I do believe it is important to understand that both have a very different worldview.

    • @xXskyanethiaXx
      @xXskyanethiaXx 6 років тому

      I wondered that, as I figured that the caste system was not supposed to be based on birth, but rather choice and ability...the way it seems to be in the U.S.
      I have only read some of the Vedas and Upanishads, but that was years ago. Recently though (last year), I read the Mahabharata in a University class, and while it does seem to place a huge emphasis on birth, I know it also questions it, since Lord Krishna was of lower caste, which is quite fascinating.
      That is good to hear that many gurus have been from lower castes...were they allowed to read the Vedas and the Upanishads? I was under the impression that lower castes in India are now allowed to (but I am aware that one could become enlightened without scriptures).
      Very fascinating, thank you! Do you think that the caste system in India will stop being based on birth any time soon?

    • @tejasvi18joshi
      @tejasvi18joshi 6 років тому +1

      you are talking about that social system which came into existence in 16th century then how can was Buddha against so called caste system. and btw why this caste system came into existence in 16th century. it came because of islamic invasions 11th century onwards, puting Hindus in doing dirty jibs which was not exited in India before like throwing of human wastes , killing of cows, making of leather, meat cooking etc etc from these kinds of jobs a group of Hindus were created by Muslims turk invaders later that became lower caste and later more divisions and destruction was created by British christian invaders. First you have to differentiate between religion/philosophy/tradition/moksha/meditation/practices and society/ social system to run a country. as per your logic white supremacy, class discrimination, racism, slavery, wiping out of native of america and australia, invading other countries by christians and wiping out their culture , loot and forceful conversion are part of Christianity. In India always had Varna system means choosing a profession according to talent and capability. but one can only choose one talent .Brahmans means teacher, artist, policy maker they can't generate wealth. Kshatriya means administrator , lawyer, army. they can get only specific knowledge and weapon but not wealth . Vaish means trader and businessman their duty is to generate wealth for state. Sudras means they are agriculture land owners and duty to arrange food for society, service provider and clerk etc. in your own country this varna system is practiced because it is universal. but in vedic varna system society had almost no corruption because there was no conflict of interest but today all over the world state and society have corruption because of conflict of interest.

  • @amanamola4179
    @amanamola4179 2 роки тому +1

    In Hinduism budha is a avtar of lord Vishnu as a Hindu we also worship budha ....

  • @PKG997
    @PKG997 6 років тому +42

    Buddhism Is part of Hindu
    Buddha was athiest

    • @infinitegoodness233
      @infinitegoodness233 5 років тому +2

      Buddhism was never a part of Hinduism and Buddha was not an Atheist. He did say that Gods existed. He just said Knowing the Existence of a Creator Deity or a Higher Power is not Necessary for Salvation and he was Silent on the Existence of God.

    • @anniemaraj8773
      @anniemaraj8773 5 років тому +1

      @@infinitegoodness233 He was part of Hinduism but He was more interested into eliminating suffering other than ritualism of the day.

    • @marotirokade1580
      @marotirokade1580 5 років тому +1

      pagal kute kuch bhi bol raha He

    • @jattboys8151
      @jattboys8151 5 років тому

      @@infinitegoodness233 Hindus. Are ur father
      U copy Hindus

    • @hackdaccount532
      @hackdaccount532 5 років тому

      @@anniemaraj8773 no he was atheist.
      Get some knowledge.
      Buddha resisted hinduism
      Hinduism is wrong , Buddhism is right.
      That's why Buddhism made.
      Hinduism tortured lower caste for centuries and killed animals in the name of god and call female menstruation impure , these are so illetrate

  • @dillipkumarnayak4693
    @dillipkumarnayak4693 6 років тому +13

    Buddhism, Sikhism and Jainism are three Indian religions originated from the mother religion Hinduism. These are like the branches of Hinduism.

    • @lovephobic
      @lovephobic 5 років тому

      buddhism doesn't really believe in a God I think it's more like a philosophy

  • @SaeedMobayed
    @SaeedMobayed 6 років тому +289

    Hinduism is like the Six Flags theme park while Buddhism is like your local amusement park

  • @thenight1732
    @thenight1732 6 років тому +31

    I've always identified more with Buddhism. Perhaps it's due to my upbringing, but the teachings just make more sense to me.

    • @desapole
      @desapole 6 років тому +3

      Always Skeptical I've always thought so myself but I can't get jiggy with the idea of reality being inherently empty and that there is no inner self. It doesn't add up.

    • @thenight1732
      @thenight1732 6 років тому +4

      DesapoleEdits Makes perfect sense to me. Humans want to believe there is a purpose to us being here. That we are special. It's the burden of consciousness. I don't believe we are any more special than the many creatures that inhabit this planet personally. I could definitely be wrong though

    • @desapole
      @desapole 6 років тому +3

      Always Skeptical Humans aren't any more special than any other animal I 100% agree. But I prefer the idea that all animals are equally divine and an expression of the joy of creation rather than equally non-existent in terms of their inner being and only receive compassion because a monk has successfully denied any sense of self whatsoever

    • @thenight1732
      @thenight1732 6 років тому

      DesapoleEdits Fair enough, I can understand that. I guess I just have a harder time with the metaphysical aspects of hinduism because of my background. To each their own :)

    • @desapole
      @desapole 6 років тому +4

      Always Skeptical Yeah that's absolutely fair. Buddhism has always made the most sense in that respect for me as well

  • @pleaselogmeout24
    @pleaselogmeout24 Рік тому +3

    Hinduism sounds better

  • @cypher1308
    @cypher1308 6 років тому +10

    Theism is not compulsory in Hinduism. It says God or no God or multiple Gods are the same thing....those are just difference in perception.

    • @VishuddhaDas
      @VishuddhaDas  6 років тому +6

      Not the same thing just different phases of one

    • @cypher1308
      @cypher1308 6 років тому +5

      True....meant the same....Thanks for educating people like me who're born Hindus, but know nothing about it. Good Luck.

    • @soulmechanics7946
      @soulmechanics7946 5 років тому

      Si. Henotheism. It is closer to the truth than monotheism, in a way.

  • @arnavranjan3411
    @arnavranjan3411 3 роки тому +1

    Everyone is talking about deep philosophies and here I am thinking the Ganesha painting in the background looks BADASS!!

  • @ishika9920
    @ishika9920 5 років тому +1

    Buddhism has always been better option than hinduism . The concepts like meditation and oneness with god actually comes from jainism which is older than hinduism. Reincarnation is a moon matrix soul trap, the aim is to become free not by duality or singularity but by better vibrations and love and compassion.

    • @ramaraksha01
      @ramaraksha01 5 років тому

      Reincarnation is basically saying THIS IS ALL THERE IS
      Don't be a fool and think just because life is harsh, there must be something wonderful in the sky
      Life is a Gift, not a trap
      But life is not forced on you, since you believe Life is a Trap, this will be your last, after this you will exist no more - not a very good choice

    • @ramaraksha01
      @ramaraksha01 4 роки тому

      Sitting in the corner and meditating - you are one with God? How about going out and doing some volunteer work? Which one would God appreciate?
      The selfish person looking out for his mental peace or the one involving himself or herself in the pain of others?
      Life has been so harsh that we hope to run away to some magic land in the sky - that has led to exploitation by religions like Christianity & Islam - happy to make cheap easy promises of the easy good life to be had but of course one must join their religion
      Hinduism, with the concept of Reincarnation is saying don't run away - see life as a Gift - a Gift from God. Reincarnation is for the Warrior, not the Coward.
      If it is a soul trap how come when your time comes, you cling desperately to life? Why do you cry when people die? Terrorist kills hundreds - is he a good guy? He "freed" hundreds of people from this "soul trap" - a hero now?
      "love and compassion"!!! Hillarious! Sitting in a corner in a temple, closing your eyes, deaf and blind to the world around you, that is love and compassion?
      All I see is a selfish person hoping to run away from life thinking after death there is some magic land where the living will be easy
      Heaven is Fools Gold
      But you will get your heaven
      You will be reborn as a Tree or a dog or cat - as a Tree you will get to sit in one place and meditate all day - be one with God - yay!
      The fool chasing after Fools Gold gets his foolish gold

  • @horichalexandre
    @horichalexandre 6 років тому +3

    Please talk about the relation between Buddhism & Veganism. Because there are bunch of Buddhists who deny the vegan practice, especially the "Theravada".
    Thank you 🙂☺️

  • @June_815
    @June_815 4 роки тому +3

    Idk why people are so much into religious arguments in the comments. It's so simple to understand
    Hinduism - Theism with dharma and Karma
    Buddhism - Atheism with dharma and Karma
    A part of it is same as Hinduism, making it a part of Hinduism. Still both are opposite!
    One believes in God the other religion doesn't. One is Theist and another is Atheist

  • @clintonleonard5187
    @clintonleonard5187 2 роки тому +1

    I love the stoicism of Bhuddism, but I also love the oneness of Hinduism.

  • @Hard_work412
    @Hard_work412 Рік тому +1

    Sin in hinduism is called arrogance or pride
    What people are doing now by comparing both of them 🤞

  • @Sanatani_kattar
    @Sanatani_kattar 6 років тому +17

    I am kind of hindu buddhist

    • @BryoMoss
      @BryoMoss 5 років тому +1

      😵😵

    • @MrSachin8006
      @MrSachin8006 5 років тому

      .me too

    • @hackdaccount532
      @hackdaccount532 5 років тому +2

      Hindus worship god, buddhism not.
      Hindus do castism , Buddhism not.
      Hindus discriminates women as they call women menstruation impure , budhism respect everyone.

    • @MrSachin8006
      @MrSachin8006 5 років тому +3

      What is cast system and in which scripture it is mentioned in Hinduism..just don't show your ignorance if you don't know about it.. Gautam Buddha was born in Hindu family,he even didn't start Buddhism..in Hinduism we have so many enlightened people.. Gautam Buddha was one of them.

  • @sivathaiexzen4354
    @sivathaiexzen4354 6 років тому +3

    you understand only more about Hinduism .. but you still don't many of true Buddhism .... come to Thailand. learn the right teacher .you will know more ... teach sth not really true ... it is also sinful ...

  • @geoantony456
    @geoantony456 5 років тому +2

    I stopped when he said "buddhism is part of hinduism" cause it's not. Buddhism was a rebel principle of hinduism. When hunduism spoked about veda and casteism, buddhism was against casteism and varna. Even though they both have same origin, they are totally different. Buddhism was religion of common people and people who were oppressed by bhramins and their varna ideology.

  • @dharma_mane
    @dharma_mane 2 роки тому +1

    Buddhism speaks to me ☸️

  • @nomadiccoder7847
    @nomadiccoder7847 5 років тому +6

    Buddhism is part of Hinduism:-
    बुद्ध से पहले कोई बुध्दिष्ट नहीं था।
    ईशु से पहले कोई ईसाई नहीं था।
    मुहम्मद से पहले कोई मुसलमान नहीं था।
    महावीर से पहले कोई जैन नहीं था।
    गुरुनानक से पहले कोई सिख नहीं था।
    लेकिन कृष्ण पहले राम से पहले हरिश्चंद्र से पहले, भरद्वाज, सांडिल्य, गौतम इत्यादी से पहले सभी सनातन धर्मी थे क्यो कि धर्म किसी व्यक्ति विशेष से आरंभ नही होता
    through the veda i only know that
    *"वसुधैव कुटुम्बकम्"* which means
    *"the world is one family"*