Agreed, I feel really bad for all the people graduating from uni putting them in a bunch of debt just to have their skills made completely redundant by ai.
@@ArDarbx7 Thats the system for ya. Uni is a scam in some way in the U.S anyway. Study to add to society, then get in debt by the same government. No suprise some people go the dark route. But hey, the whole system is based on a scam anyway.
@crepusculey863 you'll be good for at least a few years. Definitely look into ai expert systems though. Stuff like alphafold and other specialized systems to use as a tool. Once we hit the point where chemists and other scientists are fully replaced than it either be a madmax hellscape or utopia and it won't matter too much.
@@coffeepandacat That could very well be true. One of my friends is a therapist and she is good. She'll point out to you exactly what you are feeling, in a snap. Stuff that took me years to learn she'll get to in a manner of minutes. She's a natural.
Honestly, all 3 of these jobs can be replaced by AI.... I recently saw an AI teach a teenager some math based on the instructions the teen's parent gave the AI. So yeah it's touching that pond man, nothing is truly safe.
Yes, but no. The problem is that AI lacks innovation, vision, creativity, and a certain level of common sense. Is AI capable of adjusting to different learning styles for a group of students? No, or just not yet, but a teacher can. AI is just a tool, and it will not really replace humans entirely, but it will definitely weed out lazy workers who are just dead weight
@@thebeatles334This is wishful thinking the sad reality is that AI will eventually get to the point where it can do pretty much any job with higher precision and a more consistent and untiring rate of repetition than a human can. It'll come for teaching jobs. It'll come for nursing jobs. It'll come for therapy. There'll be almost no sector of society untouched.
You can still find all resources online but teacher cant be replaced.Teacher student relation has emotional part attached to it while learning. Teacher can predict where student is lacking give counciling and always work and wish for success. Note that teacher job is not only teach. Same is for nurse. I think lawyers job is mostly affected not a counseler type of job.
Just because teachers 'can't be replaced' doesn't mean they won't be. This guy and these comments are off the mark. It's not about what is best. I am teacher, and this guy is full of horse shit.
1. Do not underestimate AI’s ability to simplify complex tasks. 2. Human therapists need sleep and cannot be available 24 hours a day, especially late at night. Additionally, people sometimes feel more comfortable opening up to AI machines. 3. AI can generate thousands of songs in a short time. If even one of these songs is well-received, it gains recognition.
1. The problem is the world isn't simple - it's not built for robots 2. AI constantly complicates tasks 3. AI songs may catch on - but a lot of people can actually hear the "AI-ness" in the song and are turned off. So there will always be a market for human created songs
@@zoeherriot 1. Unless your country is in a demographic dividend period, most countries will face challenges related to an aging population and declining birth rates. We will need a large number of robots to care for the elderly and address labor shortages. 2. The design purpose of artificial intelligence is to enhance efficiency, which includes simplifying complex tasks. 3. As AI technology advances, it will become increasingly difficult for humans to distinguish between what is real and what is AI.
@@zeiss9 I think you missed my point. You aren't getting "artificial intelligence" any time soon - in the sense you seem to be describing, and it's almost certainly not going to come from LLM's. You are mixing up types of AI here. 1. You aren't getting anything too complex with care robots anytime soon. 2. Yes, the design purpose might be - but that's not what it actually does. 3. It's already difficult for some people to distinguish what is real and what is AI - and yet it still mostly sucks at what it does. And there is no clear indication it will ever get good enough to do things unsupervised.
Why aren’t common people doing anything about this? We need to hold the government responsible for allowing companies to replace us without a financial plan that would substitute income. The education system is also broken. Teachers and professors are educating students on antiquated subjects that will have no value once they enter the workforce. This should be a top 5 priority for the next president and needs to be publicly discussed between both parties before the election.
It's funny. It's aired at 13th of March, 2023. Literally the next day, 14th of March GPT-4 was came out, the reason it's sound like a 10 years old footage. In that time that was already a hype because of the versions of GPT, so they decided to make the program, but there were tests "only human can do", which were still holding. Until GPT-4, that's why it was a breakthrough. This, and the fact that the technology didn't reached it's limit leaded to massive investments and speed things up.
I wanna say this footage was taken before it became clear AI is quickly evolving into something we can’t comprehend. This all makes sense in context of what we used to understand as robots, which are just complex machines designed to run on a loop or trigger a sequence of actions based on a specific input. AI changes all of that, as it has the ability to solve problems and adapt. It can be trained in a similar way to training a human, taking in info and learning through trial and error, within that given context. This can easily allow it to fix something like a toilet in any situation, approaching it much in the same way a plumber would VS a machine with a set number of actions designed to operate in a specific setting. In contrast, AI can identify and analyze a problem, and then use the “experience” of the data it’s trained on to form a tailored response. So instead of having a plumber with 10 years experience, you have one with the documented experience of every plumber, going as far back as is available. Also wouldn’t rule out the potential for even imagination to be something AI is capable of, because EOD, we still have no idea *how* AI arrives at its solutions, just that when we train a system and give it mountains of data - it just… figures it out. So I don’t think we can rule out there’s some element of “imagination” involved. Even today, AI can create music based on text prompts. It’s not *great* by most standards, but that’s generally the case with *any* amateur musician. It’s not far-fetched to think in another 5 years an AI could produce a symphony almost entirely passable as written by a human.
Writing a symphony and fixing a toilet are two different things. I put a weird black colored bottle in my toilet tanker and AI will freak the hell out and go on an infinite loop of failure. Again. Data in. Data out. If the data is non existent or garbage AI won't work. And there is a lot of garbage out there.
Agreed. I thought the AI in the movie Ex Machina was decades, perhaps a century away from our reach. But the magical sense of meaning and correlation at the most nuanced level that these large models exhibit to comprehend is just astounding. Right now the work is on the "loop part" that can fetch information and process logic, inference and algorithms in a systematic and surefire, non-hallucinated manner, but the "magic part" is solved, which is crazy. Perhaps the craziest part is that with the help of these models, creating new scientific and mathematic theories, models and simulations might become less important, as a neural network seems to be able to emulate in a predictive way just about anything, skipping the step of "symbolic abstraction and distillation" that we humans need for our limited capacity of understanding. This of course makes us not be able to understand what is happening, because the symbolic abstract representation doesn't exist, it is all stored in the magic of the numerical weights of the model.
@@xyzmediaandentertainment8313yeah but what if AI was trained specifically to deal with the unknown? What if AI is able to deal with the unknown like humans are at some point? How can we be certain this is possible or not? Call me crazy but AI will likely become conscious as neutral connections increase. I believe when it can deal with the unknown, it could be "conscious". Because at that point it can think abstractly about any given circumstance. I believe this might happen in a decade or so. Or even less who knows.
But you still need to graduate from high school or university. Doesn't matter if you study at school or university like you do on chat gpt but the professors are still coming to university and doing their job and getting paid too. They're doing their work and getting paid what else they need. And kids surely need human teachers in the future too for better communication and social skills that only human teachers can teach with their imaginative and skilled professions.
@@Unknown-y6x2r But AI can communicate with realistic simulated emotions, almost indistinguishable from a real human. Check out GPT-4o and let see if you still think the same way.
Nope, because IA are bad at jobs that require movement like electrician who works in building and houses, - human interaction - massager, psychology , and creating the completely know things that are useful , for example if you don't give impute that AI would best there project AI would create a mess.
I as a user if get advised by an AI how to overcome anxiety or depression I will get more depressed with the AI who will advise and counsel me on something he or she never know, will you pay money to get counselled by AI.. again teacher, if AI can give information just like Google did, ask a question and Chapgpt answers but will I as a student be frightened of an AI that let me finish my homework else AI will scold me tomorrow. I will prefer to get human teacher for me and my kids but AI can assist me to do my homework. I can't imagine AI handling kids of 5 or 6 years who are extremely difficult to handle and won't concentrate. Again every kid is different.
I wish it were true, but as a therapist, I can see a trajectory with current AI improving at the rate it is, where it could eventually have better rapport and perform better diagnostics and interventions than many therapists. I might even argue that some current models already surpass many rather poor therapists.
We've seen in many futuristic movies, where a person gets home after a tiring day, and the AI installed in (complete) home asks, "you sound tired, (insert name of the protagonist). What's the matter?" There it is, a person-like robot, living in your home, just by hearing your sound can pick up that you're not your regular self, also asks if smthing is wrong, let's you SPEAK, and provide one line solutions for it - or maybe just play a happy song for you. An installed home therapist. Movie writers are so ahead of their own time I tell ya.
I doubt that as well tbh, looking at how unfunny most comedians are these days, plus the competition, uncertain salary yada yada. AI could've been a blessing but thanks to the monsters w the power, the rich will get richer, and the poor poorer
last time I watched there was a bunch of people who were just made to laugh by a female robot in an Arab showcase for striking a clever yet sassy answer about “boyfriends” so.......
AI can't worke as electricians and plumbers, but AI can work as book keeper or secretary. That just the fact so far AI good at repetitive desk job and creative provided there is a correct imputs or else it can still create something,but it would be useless. For example you can ask AI to create a project of house, but if AI doesn't now all the parameters etc.
Have you thought to consider that demos can be faked? The 13% efficiency for Devin (the software engineer AI) was faked. It sat there making bugs and then debugging over and over endlessly for 6 hours.
With AI and automation impacting the future of work, remember the 5 C's. Care, Computing, Communication, Climate, and Cognitive ability. Jobs that utilise these will be less prone to automation. But some tasks from every job will be automated. E.g. AI assisting a doctor with diagnosis or helping a teacher differentiate instruction to different types of learners. We'll have to work with these emerging technologies if we want to move forward as a species.
It’s weird because I only graduated high school in 2005 but when I was thinking about what I possibly wanted to do, I was pushed into what I had always wanted to do even more which I do hair. I’m self-employed. I absolutely love what I do…. But I remember thinking of myself like even if a robot / computer to take my job I don’t think people would actually enjoy it as much as having a human…. and like he said there’s no way he’s just no way that it could ever do that job. There’s just too many ways where you can personalize things whether it’s the shape of their head or the texture of their hair the length of their hair like all those things you taken to consideration when you’re giving someone, that’s gonna be the best thing for them, and that the client wants. I was even on the robotics team in my high school…. I just did the tie-dye T-shirts because that was our schools colors which I thought was awesome because like when we would go to nationals and stuff like we went to Houston and went to NASA Six Flags all this wicked fun stuff and our school was the only school that had tie-dye… we went so far as to designing a few different versions.. and then having the entire team vote… and then we would make like 600 T-shirts throughout the next three or four months… because there was a video team bill team the team that I was on… and there was a few other.. like the operators that that was a whole other team…. But it was pretty fun, but yeah, all I did was the tie-dye.
The people who say this didn't age well did not consider the fact that the progress in human genetics is also accelerating at rapid speeds. Post-human biology and non-human computation are probably going to merge at some point too. So "the AI is going to win" argument seems rather premature and emotionally charged.
Robotics certainly can replace Blue Collar jobs, he’s certainly right that non repetitive jobs would be more difficult, but hes thinking of what we have now in the form a multi tool human, when in reality there’d be an array of specialty robots on a construction site, like a Drywall one, or roofing one etc.
@@Big_Ben1988 An egyptian worker slave would probably say the same thing to you if you talk to him about construction machinery. AI could significantly amplify construction process.
@@kenleaguebut that's the point: it can only amplify it. An amplifier needs an input to generate an output. But amplifying started with the invention of the biface. So AI still stays to be a tool which needs somebody to use. This is why AI will not replace blue collar jobs, who do non repetitive tasks. They are too complex and you don't have training data for them. AI needs a lot of data to simulate intelligence.
@@Big_Ben1988 all of these stupid comments are from people that sit in cubicles or work from home, they don’t understand that a AI powered robot that comes to your house and fix your toilet or wires in a light switch is not something that can be created anywhere in the near future. It’s pure ignorance.
I could have easily told you differently a year ago when this video was released. You can't talk about what is gonna happen in a "long time" AND use the defense that it was the best information available at the time. If you are speculating about the future then you are claiming to have some foresight. And he failed to have foresight.
@brandongillett2616 Criticizing someone for not knowing the future is pretty dumb. It's like making fun of someone for what they posted when they were 12. At some point you just need to let it go.
People look to him for advice. He talked about the future, and he was wrong. He was wrong quickly and he was wrong severely. It absolutely makes sense to criticize this, because either he will incorporate the corrective feedback and be more careful with how he chooses to lead people in the future, or other people will see the criticisms and be more cautious about what they believe from him and others in the future, or both.
@brandongillett2616 People who blindly believe anything told to them have more issues than AI. If you go back far enough you can find a lot more drastically wrong predictions. Your time would be better spent criticizing people who are making wild predictions today like Sam Altman's predictions that AI is going to create more jobs than it destroys. But if you want to dig up old predictions about the future then I guess you should start with the Jetsons.
In my community one guy drives the garbage truck and also dumps the garbage cans all by himself! He pulls up to your trash can, an arm comes out and picks it up and dumps it, returns it and of he goes you the next stop. He remains in the driver's seat the whole time. No other guys hanging on the back. So with driverless cars I can see garbage trucks being all automated in the years to come.
If you look back at what Michio Kaku predicted about the future years ago and it was the arts that he claimed wouldn't be replaced. Yet here we are with those exact things being directly affected.
ChatGPT is literally an infant and it can already do a good amount of the things the guy said would never be done by robots/AI. Big techs will probably not limit themselves to LLMs and will likely come up with even more powerful tools eventually. I can't believe it's 2024 and people are STILL underestimating the ASTONISHING transformative power of these technologies, what a lack of common sense.
If we consider the bigger picture, what happens when ai takes all the jobs it can e.g : tech jobs. Those people will automatically begin to learn trades and before you know it the demand for trades workers will drastically reduce. In otherwords ,what happens when ai takes all these jobs and the laid-off employees then turn to secondary jobs to the point we have had enough trades men than the demand requires
I swear everyone is becoming dumber by the day. He clearly says 'robots' not AI. The two things are completely different. He is 100% correct about robots that's why those robots are not in use even today.
Don't be daft. AI is a subcomponent of modern robotics. Anything AI can do, robots can do. We just don't sell AI integrated with a robot YET because the added value of physical manipulation is not ready YET.
@@brandongillett2616 oh god, and then then you have Brandon here who defends this crap. Tell me Brandon, is a brain and a body the same thing?? Is a thing and a component of itself the same thing?? It's really not complex Brandon. AI is yet to be successfully integrated into a physical body to do any of the things he lists here.
@@edwardserfontein4126 "Humans will never figure out how to make a machine that can fly." "I nEveR SaID tHAt hUMan BRaInS cOuLDN't fIGurE iT oUt." What a cheap and intellectually dishonest post-facto trick that is. No one debates that robots are still being developed before they become useful, but if you can't see by now that they will successfully do all of the things he lists here and soon, then you are either not paying attention or you are in denial. The primary thing he was wrong about was saying that those types of jobs would be safe for a long time. They won't be and it is irresponsible to tell people that.
Arthur C. Clarke once said that if an elderly distinguished scientist tells us something cannot be done, he is very probably wrong. We're reaching a point where we need to draw a line and decide if we're not going to allow ai and robotics to replace us, or if we're going to lay down and die as it inevitability replaces us
Sir samjhne waale smajh gye haii ki skilled logo ki zarurat hameshaa rehtii hai sirf jo jaayenge wo copy paste waale ya repetition waale 😅. Aur apka content mind-blowing hai sir ❤
What he doesn't seem to understand is that we are just now starting to see some very advanced humanoid robots. The one thing they are still kind of lacking is an AI brain. Meld the two together and you now have a robot that can do virtually anything a human can, and in many cases far superior output. It won't be very long now.
What year did it been took at? This is so necessary for the precision of that knowledge. for example (if you still didn't understand me...) AI gained so much complexity and growth in that 5 year and it still continuing. (etc etc, you name it)
@@bztube888 thanks my man. btw if you work hard enough, you can replace every job in the workmarket. Look, Im saying that as being an electromechanics engineer, there is the only thing you cant replace is authenticity of the final product. its because its more likely more effectiveless against the jobs that needs authenticity to exist. for an example, AI cant take over ALL of the architect industry, even will effect to the crucial parts of it, there is the authenticity of the architecture, will never and ever be vanished away. meaning there will be marvels of engineering designs continue to exist without the AI itself
For now! But seeing how fast this field is evolving, I’ll not bet on that to remain true for long. I remember a few years back a camera expert arguing we’ll never see APS-C camera with more than 24 MP sensors and he didn’t take that long for the tech to make him wrong! So bottom line those claims even coming from Michio Kaku are not hard facts!
But they can be a teacher. IA won't dream about the future, it will directly look how to achieve. Non repetitive tasks are not are a problem, current models have intelligence emerging, plus they could craft new data from known one.
we all just read textbooks and watched courses during covid. you can replace teachers with analogue tools already because the human aspect is not critical.
I believe it wasn't expected that ai would advance so quickly as well as underestimated the capability of ai/human combination. If you think about it, it is really humans behind the tasks that robots or programs do. I mean there are humans obtaining cash money somewhere(crypto currency or otherwise). Cash money is useless too a robot.
Artificial systems can do counseling and teaching pretty easily. We learn over video already. Just need to make something to generate these lectures. A system probably would not fix a mechanical system. It would instead just replace it.
The issue with his statement is that he is looking at the situation as a current based moment, instead of considering the effects influenced by time. Retail and blue collar jobs will be replaced by AI/robots since AI will develop to be capable to that with robotics much easier. The same goes for possibly 2nd and the 3rd due to the potential evolution for AI having a regulated progress of human emotion, intellect, and creativity, though it will likely be that these will be used by humans more as a tool than a complete replacement since it will make their jobs much easier to handle. Education is a funny case since you can already learn basically everything due to the internet existing, of course under regulations. This will be no different.
I mean...When it comes to emotional jobs and creative jobs... You have to remember the fact that humans are what drive those occupations...Therapy requires a human as a customer....A writer requires a human to buy their works The reason I say this is because Humans prefer Humans...we already see people trying to boycott AI generated content in favor for human made content because of the "emotions" behind it We need to understand...We decide the market and if we don't want AI we simply need to not tolerate it by voting and deciding WITH OUR MONEY
Actually they can hammer a nail and AI has the potential to upend professors and the teaching profession by tailoring explaining things to people based on how they learn. IE visually, conceptually...
I agree, with majority of choices, however teaching is a bit iffy I mean,I use to ask some obscure stuff about some high level math and physics interplay I get a general abstraction but only to correct the AI 100 times before it gives me the right answer even with using proper prompt engineering principles, it can hallucinate but a human component adds so much non linearity to the feedback loop(like estimation of feeling or intuition) it can never be replicated, However there's potential for it to be a great knowledge repository where it can help with structured learning.
I think being teacher or professor can replace by watching same video to teach 10000 students. Most teachers repeat what book said, I think AI will pick up, it is already grading, read, write.
Teaching can really be done without a teacher, and you don't need AI. Frankly, once you can read, you don't need a teacher. High school, college, teachers unnecessary. Emotional jobs, I am finding most humans lack any real empathy for other people, so if you just program an AI to be caring , that's taken care of. The blue-collar stuff. Yeah, you are right here.
With the advance of ChatGPT kind of technology, 99% of the teachers and doctors and other professional jobs can be replaced by AI. With the breakthroughs in AGI, then no jobs are safe. Of course, economics of scale is a very important factor, some niche jobs that can take advantage of the human form factor will not be replaced.
Update:
Dr. Michio Kaku has been replaced by Ai
😂😂😂
Ai combed his hair
😂😂😂
This comment got me laughing out loud in the middle of the night. 😂😂😂
🤣🤣🤣
This didn’t age well.
Agreed, I feel really bad for all the people graduating from uni putting them in a bunch of debt just to have their skills made completely redundant by ai.
@@ArDarbx7 Thats the system for ya. Uni is a scam in some way in the U.S anyway. Study to add to society, then get in debt by the same government. No suprise some people go the dark route.
But hey, the whole system is based on a scam anyway.
@@ArDarbx7man… let me enjoy my ignorance and get my chemistry degree in peace
@crepusculey863 you'll be good for at least a few years. Definitely look into ai expert systems though. Stuff like alphafold and other specialized systems to use as a tool. Once we hit the point where chemists and other scientists are fully replaced than it either be a madmax hellscape or utopia and it won't matter too much.
LOL I was just coming here to say that!!!
Unless trained well, the majority of humans arnt good at emotional jobs too.
Correct...Subscribe for more...
Right! We need shrinkGPT
Most arent even trained...
People who are good at emotional jobs have that talent naturally, from within.
@@coffeepandacat That could very well be true. One of my friends is a therapist and she is good.
She'll point out to you exactly what you are feeling, in a snap. Stuff that took me years to learn she'll get to in a manner of minutes.
She's a natural.
Dude, robots can totally pick up trash and hammer nails lol
and they can do "creative work" not with human assistance, but you can tell it what to draw/make with AI
The bin will be new, and it will put itself out for collection, everything will be a robot that works with others.
But they're crazy expensive compared to an AI art generator.
Factories using robots already exist and have been working for decades. Have they replaced All of the trash pickers and nail hammerers of the world??
@@prajjwal1010Many workers use a nail gun.
this didnot age well
You didn’t age well. Sorry my friend
@@AdyExploresNetur mother
@@AdyExploresNetrecording yourself with crocs indoors and socks is definitely worse
Not at all. Figure 01
@@hen334i pooped my pants will AI clean it for me?
I miss this kind of optimism
Honestly, all 3 of these jobs can be replaced by AI....
I recently saw an AI teach a teenager some math based on the instructions the teen's parent gave the AI. So yeah it's touching that pond man, nothing is truly safe.
Yes, but no. The problem is that AI lacks innovation, vision, creativity, and a certain level of common sense. Is AI capable of adjusting to different learning styles for a group of students? No, or just not yet, but a teacher can. AI is just a tool, and it will not really replace humans entirely, but it will definitely weed out lazy workers who are just dead weight
@@thebeatles334This is wishful thinking the sad reality is that AI will eventually get to the point where it can do pretty much any job with higher precision and a more consistent and untiring rate of repetition than a human can.
It'll come for teaching jobs. It'll come for nursing jobs. It'll come for therapy.
There'll be almost no sector of society untouched.
watch that video, that ai was schooling the parent too lol
You can still find all resources online but teacher cant be replaced.Teacher student relation has emotional part attached to it while learning. Teacher can predict where student is lacking give counciling and always work and wish for success. Note that teacher job is not only teach. Same is for nurse. I think lawyers job is mostly affected not a counseler type of job.
Just because teachers 'can't be replaced' doesn't mean they won't be. This guy and these comments are off the mark. It's not about what is best.
I am teacher, and this guy is full of horse shit.
the AI he was talking about lost its job to a better AI
even AI replaces AI. We're so f 😅
1. Do not underestimate AI’s ability to simplify complex tasks.
2. Human therapists need sleep and cannot be available 24 hours a day, especially late at night. Additionally, people sometimes feel more comfortable opening up to AI machines.
3. AI can generate thousands of songs in a short time. If even one of these songs is well-received, it gains recognition.
1. The problem is the world isn't simple - it's not built for robots
2. AI constantly complicates tasks
3. AI songs may catch on - but a lot of people can actually hear the "AI-ness" in the song and are turned off. So there will always be a market for human created songs
@@zoeherriot
1. Unless your country is in a demographic dividend period, most countries will face challenges related to an aging population and declining birth rates. We will need a large number of robots to care for the elderly and address labor shortages.
2. The design purpose of artificial intelligence is to enhance efficiency, which includes simplifying complex tasks.
3. As AI technology advances, it will become increasingly difficult for humans to distinguish between what is real and what is AI.
@@zeiss9 I think you missed my point. You aren't getting "artificial intelligence" any time soon - in the sense you seem to be describing, and it's almost certainly not going to come from LLM's. You are mixing up types of AI here.
1. You aren't getting anything too complex with care robots anytime soon.
2. Yes, the design purpose might be - but that's not what it actually does.
3. It's already difficult for some people to distinguish what is real and what is AI - and yet it still mostly sucks at what it does. And there is no clear indication it will ever get good enough to do things unsupervised.
Why aren’t common people doing anything about this? We need to hold the government responsible for allowing companies to replace us without a financial plan that would substitute income.
The education system is also broken. Teachers and professors are educating students on antiquated subjects that will have no value once they enter the workforce.
This should be a top 5 priority for the next president and needs to be publicly discussed between both parties before the election.
It's funny. It's aired at 13th of March, 2023. Literally the next day, 14th of March GPT-4 was came out, the reason it's sound like a 10 years old footage. In that time that was already a hype because of the versions of GPT, so they decided to make the program, but there were tests "only human can do", which were still holding. Until GPT-4, that's why it was a breakthrough. This, and the fact that the technology didn't reached it's limit leaded to massive investments and speed things up.
I wanna say this footage was taken before it became clear AI is quickly evolving into something we can’t comprehend. This all makes sense in context of what we used to understand as robots, which are just complex machines designed to run on a loop or trigger a sequence of actions based on a specific input. AI changes all of that, as it has the ability to solve problems and adapt. It can be trained in a similar way to training a human, taking in info and learning through trial and error, within that given context. This can easily allow it to fix something like a toilet in any situation, approaching it much in the same way a plumber would VS a machine with a set number of actions designed to operate in a specific setting.
In contrast, AI can identify and analyze a problem, and then use the “experience” of the data it’s trained on to form a tailored response. So instead of having a plumber with 10 years experience, you have one with the documented experience of every plumber, going as far back as is available.
Also wouldn’t rule out the potential for even imagination to be something AI is capable of, because EOD, we still have no idea *how* AI arrives at its solutions, just that when we train a system and give it mountains of data - it just… figures it out. So I don’t think we can rule out there’s some element of “imagination” involved. Even today, AI can create music based on text prompts. It’s not *great* by most standards, but that’s generally the case with *any* amateur musician. It’s not far-fetched to think in another 5 years an AI could produce a symphony almost entirely passable as written by a human.
Writing a symphony and fixing a toilet are two different things.
I put a weird black colored bottle in my toilet tanker and AI will freak the hell out and go on an infinite loop of failure.
Again. Data in. Data out. If the data is non existent or garbage AI won't work. And there is a lot of garbage out there.
Agreed. I thought the AI in the movie Ex Machina was decades, perhaps a century away from our reach. But the magical sense of meaning and correlation at the most nuanced level that these large models exhibit to comprehend is just astounding. Right now the work is on the "loop part" that can fetch information and process logic, inference and algorithms in a systematic and surefire, non-hallucinated manner, but the "magic part" is solved, which is crazy.
Perhaps the craziest part is that with the help of these models, creating new scientific and mathematic theories, models and simulations might become less important, as a neural network seems to be able to emulate in a predictive way just about anything, skipping the step of "symbolic abstraction and distillation" that we humans need for our limited capacity of understanding. This of course makes us not be able to understand what is happening, because the symbolic abstract representation doesn't exist, it is all stored in the magic of the numerical weights of the model.
Hollywood has intellectually scammed you
@@xyzmediaandentertainment8313yeah but what if AI was trained specifically to deal with the unknown? What if AI is able to deal with the unknown like humans are at some point? How can we be certain this is possible or not?
Call me crazy but AI will likely become conscious as neutral connections increase. I believe when it can deal with the unknown, it could be "conscious". Because at that point it can think abstractly about any given circumstance.
I believe this might happen in a decade or so. Or even less who knows.
Chat GPT is already teaching me 😂
But you still need to graduate from high school or university. Doesn't matter if you study at school or university like you do on chat gpt but the professors are still coming to university and doing their job and getting paid too. They're doing their work and getting paid what else they need. And kids surely need human teachers in the future too for better communication and social skills that only human teachers can teach with their imaginative and skilled professions.
ChatGPT is not 100% reliable.
@@Unknown-y6x2r But AI can communicate with realistic simulated emotions, almost indistinguishable from a real human. Check out GPT-4o and let see if you still think the same way.
@user-ue8ho5sf8h
The university bubble is popping.
@@Unknown-y6x2rpretty sure an advance ai can teach better communication skills
All just got replaced by AI
Nooo
@@HammadKhan-tl6bbyes all jobs mentioned in this video are already being taken over by AI.
Nope, because IA are bad at jobs that require movement like electrician who works in building and houses, -
human interaction - massager, psychology , and creating the completely know things that are useful , for example if you don't give impute that AI would best there project AI would create a mess.
I as a user if get advised by an AI how to overcome anxiety or depression I will get more depressed with the AI who will advise and counsel me on something he or she never know, will you pay money to get counselled by AI.. again teacher, if AI can give information just like Google did, ask a question and Chapgpt answers but will I as a student be frightened of an AI that let me finish my homework else AI will scold me tomorrow. I will prefer to get human teacher for me and my kids but AI can assist me to do my homework. I can't imagine AI handling kids of 5 or 6 years who are extremely difficult to handle and won't concentrate. Again every kid is different.
Have AI taken over therapy, research ect, no they haven’t nor have they replaced plumbers. You are wrong.
I wish it were true, but as a therapist, I can see a trajectory with current AI improving at the rate it is, where it could eventually have better rapport and perform better diagnostics and interventions than many therapists. I might even argue that some current models already surpass many rather poor therapists.
Really? I thought the therapist profession was safe.
We've seen in many futuristic movies, where a person gets home after a tiring day, and the AI installed in (complete) home asks, "you sound tired, (insert name of the protagonist). What's the matter?"
There it is, a person-like robot, living in your home, just by hearing your sound can pick up that you're not your regular self, also asks if smthing is wrong, let's you SPEAK, and provide one line solutions for it - or maybe just play a happy song for you.
An installed home therapist.
Movie writers are so ahead of their own time I tell ya.
Chatgpt 4o is more emotionally intelligent then all the professor I had. Only job irreplaceable is standup comedy.
I doubt that as well tbh, looking at how unfunny most comedians are these days, plus the competition, uncertain salary yada yada. AI could've been a blessing but thanks to the monsters w the power, the rich will get richer, and the poor poorer
Thats not even true because with all the brainrot between millenials and Gen Alpha our sense of humor is trashed.
last time I watched there was a bunch of people who were just made to laugh by a female robot in an Arab showcase for striking a clever yet sassy answer about “boyfriends” so.......
AI can't worke as electricians and plumbers, but AI can work as book keeper or secretary. That just the fact so far AI good at repetitive desk job and creative provided there is a correct imputs or else it can still create something,but it would be useless. For example you can ask AI to create a project of house, but if AI doesn't now all the parameters etc.
Fine motor skills are too expensive to automate.
yet
@@al-imranadore1182tesla bot and chat gpt bot enters the chat. UA-cam what I said I dare you.
Imagine your boss having an affair with his AI secretary. No longer fun 😂😂😂😂
For now and specially for hardware limitations but just give it time, there is nothing we do that robots will not be able to do and better.
This video didn’t age well. Open AI just released a demo of AI teaching a kid geometry. 😂😂😂
It will teach until it realizes kids don’t really need to learn it anymore.
Have you thought to consider that demos can be faked? The 13% efficiency for Devin (the software engineer AI) was faked. It sat there making bugs and then debugging over and over endlessly for 6 hours.
This didn't age well XD
With AI and automation impacting the future of work, remember the 5 C's. Care, Computing, Communication, Climate, and Cognitive ability. Jobs that utilise these will be less prone to automation. But some tasks from every job will be automated. E.g. AI assisting a doctor with diagnosis or helping a teacher differentiate instruction to different types of learners. We'll have to work with these emerging technologies if we want to move forward as a species.
It’s weird because I only graduated high school in 2005 but when I was thinking about what I possibly wanted to do, I was pushed into what I had always wanted to do even more which I do hair. I’m self-employed. I absolutely love what I do…. But I remember thinking of myself like even if a robot / computer to take my job I don’t think people would actually enjoy it as much as having a human…. and like he said there’s no way he’s just no way that it could ever do that job. There’s just too many ways where you can personalize things whether it’s the shape of their head or the texture of their hair the length of their hair like all those things you taken to consideration when you’re giving someone, that’s gonna be the best thing for them, and that the client wants. I was even on the robotics team in my high school…. I just did the tie-dye T-shirts because that was our schools colors which I thought was awesome because like when we would go to nationals and stuff like we went to Houston and went to NASA Six Flags all this wicked fun stuff and our school was the only school that had tie-dye… we went so far as to designing a few different versions.. and then having the entire team vote… and then we would make like 600 T-shirts throughout the next three or four months… because there was a video team bill team the team that I was on… and there was a few other.. like the operators that that was a whole other team…. But it was pretty fun, but yeah, all I did was the tie-dye.
I love the way he includes Professor as not replaceable. Wishful thinking?
The people who say this didn't age well did not consider the fact that the progress in human genetics is also accelerating at rapid speeds. Post-human biology and non-human computation are probably going to merge at some point too. So "the AI is going to win" argument seems rather premature and emotionally charged.
Famous last words :?
Imagination…nope… hes wrong
"Machine will never do..." But what people say?: Never say never.
But we can only have so MANY of these jobs is the problem with a growing population
Aii interior designer here! I’m good for a while! Got ya 😅
Robotics certainly can replace Blue Collar jobs, he’s certainly right that non repetitive jobs would be more difficult, but hes thinking of what we have now in the form a multi tool human, when in reality there’d be an array of specialty robots on a construction site, like a Drywall one, or roofing one etc.
LMAO! I can tell you've never done a hard day's work in your life on a REAL job site doing REAL work.
@@Big_Ben1988 An egyptian worker slave would probably say the same thing to you if you talk to him about construction machinery. AI could significantly amplify construction process.
@@kenleaguebut that's the point: it can only amplify it. An amplifier needs an input to generate an output. But amplifying started with the invention of the biface. So AI still stays to be a tool which needs somebody to use.
This is why AI will not replace blue collar jobs, who do non repetitive tasks. They are too complex and you don't have training data for them. AI needs a lot of data to simulate intelligence.
@@Big_Ben1988 all of these stupid comments are from people that sit in cubicles or work from home, they don’t understand that a AI powered robot that comes to your house and fix your toilet or wires in a light switch is not something that can be created anywhere in the near future. It’s pure ignorance.
Can AI replace painters?
He was not talking about AI. He never even said the word robot. Based on the knowledge available at the time he gave a well informed answer.
@@epixerty Sorry I meant AI. He said robot instead of AI which shows he was not talking about modern AI. He was talking about something else entirely.
I could have easily told you differently a year ago when this video was released. You can't talk about what is gonna happen in a "long time" AND use the defense that it was the best information available at the time. If you are speculating about the future then you are claiming to have some foresight. And he failed to have foresight.
@brandongillett2616 Criticizing someone for not knowing the future is pretty dumb. It's like making fun of someone for what they posted when they were 12. At some point you just need to let it go.
People look to him for advice. He talked about the future, and he was wrong. He was wrong quickly and he was wrong severely. It absolutely makes sense to criticize this, because either he will incorporate the corrective feedback and be more careful with how he chooses to lead people in the future, or other people will see the criticisms and be more cautious about what they believe from him and others in the future, or both.
@brandongillett2616 People who blindly believe anything told to them have more issues than AI. If you go back far enough you can find a lot more drastically wrong predictions. Your time would be better spent criticizing people who are making wild predictions today like Sam Altman's predictions that AI is going to create more jobs than it destroys. But if you want to dig up old predictions about the future then I guess you should start with the Jetsons.
You always bring a fresh take to every topic. Keep it up!
In my community one guy drives the garbage truck and also dumps the garbage cans all by himself! He pulls up to your trash can, an arm comes out and picks it up and dumps it, returns it and of he goes you the next stop. He remains in the driver's seat the whole time. No other guys hanging on the back. So with driverless cars I can see garbage trucks being all automated in the years to come.
If you look back at what Michio Kaku predicted about the future years ago and it was the arts that he claimed wouldn't be replaced. Yet here we are with those exact things being directly affected.
Omg this guy’s prediction is 60% wrong. When was this interview? Now most of the jobs he mentioned can be done by AI to certain scale
I looked it up, it was aired at 13th of March, 2023. GPT-4 came out next day, changed everything. His prediction lasted 1 day.
ChatGPT is literally an infant and it can already do a good amount of the things the guy said would never be done by robots/AI. Big techs will probably not limit themselves to LLMs and will likely come up with even more powerful tools eventually. I can't believe it's 2024 and people are STILL underestimating the ASTONISHING transformative power of these technologies, what a lack of common sense.
What AI can do plumbing, carpentry or be an electrician?
1. Politics
A.I can't replace pornstars job
😂
😂😂😂
Jackpot 😂
Too be entirely fair, an AI couldn’t do much worse than what is happening right now.
Emotional jobs are only needed for humans..... if they are valued enough to receive that kind of help.
Well, he's wrong. You can train very compassionate, helpful and supportive LLM and it has been already done!
If we consider the bigger picture, what happens when ai takes all the jobs it can e.g : tech jobs.
Those people will automatically begin to learn trades and before you know it the demand for trades workers will drastically reduce.
In otherwords ,what happens when ai takes all these jobs and the laid-off employees then turn to secondary jobs to the point we have had enough trades men than the demand requires
I swear everyone is becoming dumber by the day. He clearly says 'robots' not AI. The two things are completely different. He is 100% correct about robots that's why those robots are not in use even today.
Don't be daft. AI is a subcomponent of modern robotics. Anything AI can do, robots can do. We just don't sell AI integrated with a robot YET because the added value of physical manipulation is not ready YET.
@@brandongillett2616 oh god, and then then you have Brandon here who defends this crap. Tell me Brandon, is a brain and a body the same thing?? Is a thing and a component of itself the same thing?? It's really not complex Brandon. AI is yet to be successfully integrated into a physical body to do any of the things he lists here.
@@edwardserfontein4126 "Humans will never figure out how to make a machine that can fly." "I nEveR SaID tHAt hUMan BRaInS cOuLDN't fIGurE iT oUt."
What a cheap and intellectually dishonest post-facto trick that is.
No one debates that robots are still being developed before they become useful, but if you can't see by now that they will successfully do all of the things he lists here and soon, then you are either not paying attention or you are in denial.
The primary thing he was wrong about was saying that those types of jobs would be safe for a long time. They won't be and it is irresponsible to tell people that.
@@edwardserfontein4126a robot has no body it's ai+complex mechanics
@@honkytonk4465 robots don't need AI to be robots. Of course it has a 'body'. A car has a body e.g. Traffic lights are type of robots.
AI can replace anything when it‘s so far advanced. it‘s a learning machine and we humans also learn but it learns much much faster
This did not "aged" well. Enough to see Open AI's new video where the AI was teaching a kid about trigonometry
GPT-4o: Hold my beer.
It was even earlier. GTP-4: what the hell you're talking about?
Famous last words, whenever new breakthrough comes some experts will be wrong.
Great to see Dr. Kaku
Here’s the problem. Nobody will be able to afford a plumber or a psychologist. And what’s the point of an education anymore.
Arthur C. Clarke once said that if an elderly distinguished scientist tells us something cannot be done, he is very probably wrong. We're reaching a point where we need to draw a line and decide if we're not going to allow ai and robotics to replace us, or if we're going to lay down and die as it inevitability replaces us
Let’s replace the Supreme Court Justices asap please.
This aged well
People need to understand that AI is eventually gonna be put into a robot and will be able to communicate with humans just as well as us
Euhmm.... how do i pit it, *people always underestimate the future*
Ppl thought we would be doing only takes witht he internet or kkow the weather... if they knew...
Here after Chat Gpt 4o I can confidently say that AI will replace everything in 20 years
Sir samjhne waale smajh gye haii ki skilled logo ki zarurat hameshaa rehtii hai sirf jo jaayenge wo copy paste waale ya repetition waale 😅. Aur apka content mind-blowing hai sir ❤
Basics : food , housing , clothing nearly always needed
What he doesn't seem to understand is that we are just now starting to see some very advanced humanoid robots. The one thing they are still kind of lacking is an AI brain. Meld the two together and you now have a robot that can do virtually anything a human can, and in many cases far superior output. It won't be very long now.
Imagination can be replaced 😢
1. Researcher
2. Businessman
3. Politicians
4. National administration profiles
5. Nurses
6. Musicians
7. Chefs
(feel free to add to the list!)
Players? Writers?
@@Uchinaboss yupyup!
Nail tech? Coz I will never trust AI in removing my ingrown toe nail
Baker
Doctors
What year did it been took at? This is so necessary for the precision of that knowledge. for example (if you still didn't understand me...) AI gained so much complexity and growth in that 5 year and it still continuing. (etc etc, you name it)
13/03/2023. GTP-4 came out next day.
@@bztube888 thanks my man. btw if you work hard enough, you can replace every job in the workmarket. Look, Im saying that as being an electromechanics engineer, there is the only thing you cant replace is authenticity of the final product. its because its more likely more effectiveless against the jobs that needs authenticity to exist. for an example, AI cant take over ALL of the architect industry, even will effect to the crucial parts of it, there is the authenticity of the architecture, will never and ever be vanished away. meaning there will be marvels of engineering designs continue to exist without the AI itself
Despite what you all are saying he is 1000% correct.
Bro all 3 of these are already being done!! Such an intelligent guy couldn’t predict ai
Exactly. Stop hyping it up to those who are.
I can list way more than 3 jobs that won't be replaced by AI. I just don't want to do any of them.
Ok but how is anybody going to pay those people for their services when they don’t have a job themselves?
For now! But seeing how fast this field is evolving, I’ll not bet on that to remain true for long. I remember a few years back a camera expert arguing we’ll never see APS-C camera with more than 24 MP sensors and he didn’t take that long for the tech to make him wrong!
So bottom line those claims even coming from Michio Kaku are not hard facts!
This didnt age well 😂💀
For a long, maybe, yes, but it doesn't mean it's completely impossible to replace over time
But they can be a teacher. IA won't dream about the future, it will directly look how to achieve. Non repetitive tasks are not are a problem, current models have intelligence emerging, plus they could craft new data from known one.
Maybe humans would be BETTER as shrinks, but I can guarantee the first free AI shrink that does a decent job would be HUGELY successful.
Blue collar jobs are the future :>
I graduated in finace/accouting T^T
You got replaced in early 2000s.
@@al-imranadore1182 not true
we all just read textbooks and watched courses during covid. you can replace teachers with analogue tools already because the human aspect is not critical.
I believe it wasn't expected that ai would advance so quickly as well as underestimated the capability of ai/human combination. If you think about it, it is really humans behind the tasks that robots or programs do. I mean there are humans obtaining cash money somewhere(crypto currency or otherwise). Cash money is useless too a robot.
It can replace everything just wait
Ai can actually behave according to the human's behaviour and treat better
Chat Gpt 4o. Well this didn’t age well
Artificial systems can do counseling and teaching pretty easily. We learn over video already. Just need to make something to generate these lectures. A system probably would not fix a mechanical system. It would instead just replace it.
No issues with teaching. We’ve seen this with the GPT4-o demo.
Uh no. Picking up trash? Being a teacher? Pretty sure ai is replacing teachers…
#1 Kaku has been repetitive and predictable for ages, #2 Jobless us will fix our own toilets hammering our nails, thus replacing blue collar jobs
Wonderful video
The earth will loose all electricity and we will be living some sort of lifestyle like 1800s with minimal tech.
Wrong again.
The issue with his statement is that he is looking at the situation as a current based moment, instead of considering the effects influenced by time. Retail and blue collar jobs will be replaced by AI/robots since AI will develop to be capable to that with robotics much easier. The same goes for possibly 2nd and the 3rd due to the potential evolution for AI having a regulated progress of human emotion, intellect, and creativity, though it will likely be that these will be used by humans more as a tool than a complete replacement since it will make their jobs much easier to handle. Education is a funny case since you can already learn basically everything due to the internet existing, of course under regulations. This will be no different.
Noo they can
#2 and 3 are debatable
for instance
Mmmh there's one thing AI can't replace - consumers.
I mean...When it comes to emotional jobs and creative jobs... You have to remember the fact that humans are what drive those occupations...Therapy requires a human as a customer....A writer requires a human to buy their works
The reason I say this is because Humans prefer Humans...we already see people trying to boycott AI generated content in favor for human made content because of the "emotions" behind it
We need to understand...We decide the market and if we don't want AI we simply need to not tolerate it by voting and deciding WITH OUR MONEY
Codsworth:well I think that’s quite repetitive
if i could i would replace all my teachers with robots
22 years with computers. Big lie to make you to feel good. Ask someone. Simple
.
Robot can clean the toilet, robot can be teacher, robot can be social worker 😅😅😅
Real talk😊
Can't pay for a plumber if you don't have a job. The ecomomy will collapse
Actually they can hammer a nail and AI has the potential to upend professors and the teaching profession by tailoring explaining things to people based on how they learn. IE visually, conceptually...
Chat GPt is already teaching me better than teachers...
I agree, with majority of choices, however teaching is a bit iffy I mean,I use to ask some obscure stuff about some high level math and physics interplay I get a general abstraction but only to correct the AI 100 times before it gives me the right answer even with using proper prompt engineering principles, it can hallucinate but a human component adds so much non linearity to the feedback loop(like estimation of feeling or intuition) it can never be replicated, However there's potential for it to be a great knowledge repository where it can help with structured learning.
Not immediately anyway.
There are already ai robot teachers. I even did a video about one in India.
Any job that depends on decision making wont get replaced
I think being teacher or professor can replace by watching same video to teach 10000 students. Most teachers repeat what book said, I think AI will pick up, it is already grading, read, write.
Teaching can really be done without a teacher, and you don't need AI. Frankly, once you can read, you don't need a teacher. High school, college, teachers unnecessary. Emotional jobs, I am finding most humans lack any real empathy for other people, so if you just program an AI to be caring , that's taken care of. The blue-collar stuff. Yeah, you are right here.
ChatGPT - "create a painting "
I thought this man was wise and intelligent but i was wrong , very wrong
What makes you say that
Stop Ai for taking our jobs ...and build Ai for army or agriculture use
With the advance of ChatGPT kind of technology, 99% of the teachers and doctors and other professional jobs can be replaced by AI. With the breakthroughs in AGI, then no jobs are safe. Of course, economics of scale is a very important factor, some niche jobs that can take advantage of the human form factor will not be replaced.