Dan Henry 1964 Gran Turismo Chronograph Watch Review: Vintage Inspired Watch for the Everyday Dude

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 15 вер 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 53

  • @adamtesta5800
    @adamtesta5800 5 років тому +6

    Honestly ur the best watch reviewer on youtube, looking forward to the next review

  • @tjs5770
    @tjs5770 4 роки тому +3

    Really tempted by the new white and black panda bicomplex recently released. I’ve got the evil panda 1962 and I love it.

  • @VinceDae
    @VinceDae 5 років тому +4

    Sooooooo good man! I actually think I will get this watch - it looked incredible on your wrist man!

    • @IslandTimeWatchReview
      @IslandTimeWatchReview  5 років тому

      Vince Dae So great! I think the 1962 model is a great option for something more sporty. 😁

  • @ScrambldCraigs
    @ScrambldCraigs 5 років тому +2

    Thats super nice for $250 and the time capsule can be used for other things too. LOVE IT

    • @IslandTimeWatchReview
      @IslandTimeWatchReview  5 років тому +1

      Yeah for sure! Dan Henry makes some great affordable watches that give you that vintage feel!

  • @Hellacop6
    @Hellacop6 4 роки тому +1

    Super review of an superb watch, buying the evil pand Bicompax right now! Thanks

  • @thisoldbelair
    @thisoldbelair 2 роки тому +1

    Nice watch for sure. I’m in love with the Hamilton Intra-Matic Auto Chrono but I can’t in good conscience buy a $2k watch with three small kids haha. I just wish the 1964 had more colors besides black and white, and I wish the bicompax had a seconds subdial instead of the 24 hour subdial which I find unnecessary. That’s my big hang up, but I’m awful close to buying a 1964 anyway haha. We’ll see. Thanks for the video!

  • @alexk8599
    @alexk8599 4 роки тому +2

    Somehow your lighting and/or camera captures the blue tinge better than TGV's review, and this has pretty much made the decision for me to buy the watch.

    • @IslandTimeWatchReview
      @IslandTimeWatchReview  4 роки тому

      Even being compared to TGV at all and being a newer reviewer, I really appreciate that. Enjoy Alex! It's a wonderful piece!

  • @KrazyShark
    @KrazyShark 4 роки тому +1

    260$, vintage style watch, sapphire crystal, comes with a nice rice bead style band, extra leather band, watch roll for 3 watches to travel with, man oh man am i tempted. Dan Henry really made something special here.

    • @sithi96
      @sithi96 2 роки тому

      no sapphire

  • @ronin7106
    @ronin7106 4 роки тому +3

    Hi. First time to catch you in the tube. First and foremost, love the intro kapatid, but the true and straight-up review was just awesome . I have my eyes set on the Panda. After your review, Im so confused wether to take the Good or the Evil version :). If the bracelet would fit a Speedmaster FOIS, I'll take one now. See you around bro.

    • @IslandTimeWatchReview
      @IslandTimeWatchReview  4 роки тому +2

      Ronin Thanks for watching! I think this is one of those rare cases where going evil or good doesn’t matter because both are just so good 😊

  • @davidsparling3505
    @davidsparling3505 4 роки тому +2

    Excellent review! Very impressed with what Dan Henry has been able to accomplish for such a low price. Nice presentation, however you might reduce the frequency of the use of “really really”. Hope you don’t take offense at that.

    • @IslandTimeWatchReview
      @IslandTimeWatchReview  4 роки тому +2

      Thanks for watching for the constructive criticism! I'm always trying to improve :-)

  • @vikkotaruc
    @vikkotaruc 2 роки тому

    Awesome review for this awesome product! I’m hoping to buy the white panda version and ship it to the Philippines 🙂 am actually picking between the Moonswatch and this one.

  • @maiseydoodle
    @maiseydoodle 4 роки тому +2

    Great review!

  • @docgify
    @docgify 3 роки тому

    Looking fwd to more reviews from you... keep going dude your good dont give up

  • @goldenwarrior5664
    @goldenwarrior5664 2 роки тому

    Got this watch to wear everyday but found out to nice

  • @maxhulker4771
    @maxhulker4771 5 років тому +5

    You’re getting great at these

  • @jonboy8181
    @jonboy8181 6 місяців тому

    Nice watch. I think your bracelet is on backwards?

  • @monkeyman8265
    @monkeyman8265 4 роки тому +5

    Nice size too many watches are oversized. I really want to get this exact evil panda dial one.

    • @IslandTimeWatchReview
      @IslandTimeWatchReview  4 роки тому

      I agree! The comfort of a 38mm or smaller watch is something that is overlooked. I really hope sizing like this becomes more popular again!

    • @maiseydoodle
      @maiseydoodle 4 роки тому +2

      I just purchased the Evil Panda. It looks even better in person. One of the best watch values out there.

    • @IslandTimeWatchReview
      @IslandTimeWatchReview  4 роки тому

      @@maiseydoodle So great! I was wearing mine just yesterday. It's so versatile.

  • @KlausBioMadsen
    @KlausBioMadsen 4 роки тому +1

    Thanks for the review, really useful! By any chance could you tell me the name of the song you're playing at the intro? It sounds rad!

    • @IslandTimeWatchReview
      @IslandTimeWatchReview  4 роки тому

      Thanks for watching! Actually, it's stock music I got from an app called Splice!

  • @baseball199121
    @baseball199121 4 роки тому

    Did you have to take any links out of the bracelet for it to fit your wrist? My wrist is about the same size as yours.

  • @andreigandila6763
    @andreigandila6763 4 роки тому +1

    Very good review, although "flyback" as a chronograph function means something completely different. What you're showing is a basic reset.

    • @IslandTimeWatchReview
      @IslandTimeWatchReview  4 роки тому +1

      Thanks for watching! Sorry if I misspoke! Still pretty new to doing reviews. Thank you

  • @yousefgeorge3060
    @yousefgeorge3060 4 роки тому +1

    Ik this is late, but which do you think is better to wear daily? The 1962 or 64?

    • @IslandTimeWatchReview
      @IslandTimeWatchReview  4 роки тому +3

      I don't own a Dan Henry 1962, but in my opinion, the 62 looks more sporty. So I think it really depends on if daily wear for you is more sporty or dressy. I find that the 1964 can double as a more dressy piece!

    • @yousefgeorge3060
      @yousefgeorge3060 4 роки тому

      Island Time Watch Review thanks, I appreciate it

  • @docgify
    @docgify 3 роки тому +1

    Sorry mate i didnt realize that... i like the bicompax because the date at the 6 ... ibought the bicompax evil panda date... and no i dont have money for 3000 dollar watches either...;-(

  • @davidgluskie8620
    @davidgluskie8620 3 роки тому

    I bought the bicompax date evil panda version

  • @daviewavie112
    @daviewavie112 4 роки тому

    What do you think about the all silver version? The lighter one

  • @yousefgeorge3060
    @yousefgeorge3060 4 роки тому +1

    Keep making content!

    • @IslandTimeWatchReview
      @IslandTimeWatchReview  4 роки тому +1

      Thanks for the support! I'm definitely planning to keep making videos!

  • @VictorGuillen_FRC
    @VictorGuillen_FRC 3 роки тому

    Great content, I have the Dan 1962 Gold, where did you get that bracelet?

  • @scottmacmillan9436
    @scottmacmillan9436 4 роки тому

    Is it difficult to adjust the bracelet for size? I couldn't see whether it was screw or pin.

  • @davidgluskie8620
    @davidgluskie8620 3 роки тому

    No one ever mentions that it comes in date and no date bicompax as well

    • @IslandTimeWatchReview
      @IslandTimeWatchReview  3 роки тому

      I was excited to see them offer bicompax! I believe I posted this review before they offered this. Sorry!

  • @andytaylor2321
    @andytaylor2321 2 роки тому

    I bought one but you need special tools to remove bracelet. A real pita. Otherwise it’s just ok the watch. Leather band is flimsy.

  • @blackimp4987
    @blackimp4987 9 місяців тому

    I love his watches but the choice many are making to use chrono movements with UTTERLY USELESS 24h SUBDIAL makes me wanna bang my head on the wall until one of the two breaks. WHY the hell producers include those idiot movements that basically castrate chrono functions? WHY the hell?
    I'm no expert, I've just decided to buy a good chrono because I often use timer on my smartphone and I hate having to touch its glass continually to reactivate it. I used to wear a good Swatch Irony that I still like but I want a real reparable watch. My Irony has the tipical chrono subdials: tenth od secs, minutes and second for time. It would be good as well having mins and hours for chrono. I've been searching for some quartz watch, around 40mm, with classical design, black dial and leather or synsthetic bracelet... it's IMPOSSIBLE. either they are huge - Tissot has many models but 43-45mm - or they have hat stupid useless 24h subdial. WHY?? Dan Henry 1962 black or white versions are beautiful but they have that stupid subdial, 1963 42mm version it would ok but black version is over, 1964 beautiful... again the 24h subdial. I've searched for many other brands: there's nothing like this. Just a Casio that cosmetically is nothing particular.
    The first watch with these characteristics but automatic is Tag Heuer Carrera, black, that is 6500 €.
    Bulova has something 42-45mm but not as good cosmetically.
    Hamilton Jazzmaster is more expensive and it's 42mm , with an original design but not that makes so enthusiast.
    Seiko just a couple but nothing elegant.
    But really why the hell that subdial, why?

  • @fariqyosman
    @fariqyosman 4 роки тому

    Awesome review!