The F35 takes a lot of crap because of its price and Advanced Tech Emphasis but as each day progresses it becomes ever more apparent the F35 is Easily the winner in the Battle Field 9.9 out of 10 times.
@@bennittotheburrito9606 And even with full load its much more stealth than F16... Because radar pics up the signatures of the weapons but not of the aircraft. The worst thing is micro-doppler effect from fast moving parts like compressor face... And thats not an issue for F35. So it comes up on top in every scenario when compared with legacy fighters.
Just noticed that these Norwegian F-35's have some type of pod affixed on the top rear of the fuselage. I've never seen this before on any other F-35's, would anyone out there happen to know what they are?
@@Gsmooth10455 yeah, the chute makes it easier to land in slippery icy climate. Other countries are looking to have them on their F35s and I assume Finland might want to have them when they get their F35s as well.
@@phillipbanes5484 Wrong, the Norwegian jets have this configuration because of slippery tarmacs during winters. But Finland might indeed use the same system to be able to conduct road landings.
@@phillipbanes5484 Norway has never used road bases because it is hard to make a road go straight for several km in our terrain. The chute was put on the F-16 first, now on the F-35 mainly because of the extensive network of civilian airports with short runways that would be utilized in a conflict.
F-35A target was $25000 per hour, so $31000 per hour ain't that bad. Far more important is to get Block 4 and FOC. Then we want F-35A availability closer to target. Flight hour cost is lower priority than that, for maritime patrols and policing we have fleet of Poseidon and looks like we will select MQ-9 Reaper or MQ-9B SeaGuardian as long range drone. P-8A Poseidon $1050 per hour MQ-9 Reaper $3500 per hour MQ-9B SeaGuardian $5000 per hour Other 4th gen fighters not relevant, we picked F-35 in 2008 and phased out F-16 in 2022.
00:05-00:10 - Такое ощущение будто съёмка ускорена где в 1,3 раза: F-35 не поиспособлен к такому быстрому полёту (и не только быстрому, но и низкому: так низко летать над горными вершинами - небезопасно, - но только от такого низкого полёта может получиться ощущение скорости полёта в действительности, которое создаётся увеличением скорости видео). В общем, очередные уловки специалистов по монтажу видео! ;-)
Совершенно верно. Именно такое ощущение у любой жертвы российской пропаганды, в сказках которой F35 "не приспособлен". Это первая стадия принятия неизбежного, отрицание.
@@user-hh8vu1tv6k Дело не только в контрафактном дошираке, но и в дрянных специях, которые к нему прилагались: от них так "ускоряется", что отшибает чувство скорости и теряется ощущение этой самой скорости. В этом-то как раз и кроется опасность от того 'доширака"... (Я иронизирую слегка.)
Four PMCs fighters, Wagner, from Finland laid down their heads in battle. Eternal memory to them! Fighters against Ukrainian Nazism. They fought fascism as part of a British battalion commanded by a retired US Marine General...
Finnish and British volunteers, led by a retired American Marine Corps general fighting for Russia in Ukraine? Russian propaganda truly is scraping the bottom of the barrel, trying to reach out to the most gullible and naive to believe this.
Истребитель су57 посылать не надо Ваш самолет F35 падает сам по себе из-за множества неполадок, он тоже упал в море и некоторое время назад разбился при посадке. 😅😅
yeah and Stoltenberg was a CIA asset during the Vietnam war (when he was an underage teenager). The Hersh report was the biggest load of crap I have ever seen. Btw USA would not need Norwegian help to blow up the pipeline, so why involve Norway at all?
Powerful F-35.
That hangar looks like something out of Star Wars. So cool.
Beautiful vidéo !!.. thanks !!!!.... Viva Norge !!! 😃👋👋👍👍👍👍🤙!
The F35 takes a lot of crap because of its price and Advanced Tech Emphasis but as each day progresses it becomes ever more apparent the F35 is Easily the winner in the Battle Field 9.9 out of 10 times.
It’s only problem is a low payload capacity
its cheaper than most 4th gen options for alot of countries if not the same upfront cost, flyaway cost isnt much more either
@@bennittotheburrito9606IT can carry almost twice as much as JAS 39gripen for example. And also more than F16...
@@petaplayer8993 only if you sacrifice the stealth capabilities
@@bennittotheburrito9606 And even with full load its much more stealth than F16... Because radar pics up the signatures of the weapons but not of the aircraft. The worst thing is micro-doppler effect from fast moving parts like compressor face... And thats not an issue for F35. So it comes up on top in every scenario when compared with legacy fighters.
Beautiful footage. Great to have these fine people on our side
Russian bots seem rather mad today. We should give it to Ukraine for free. Then Russians can see it up close and personal.
that seems like a good idea until the russians capture one and copy everything
4:15 Ace combat hangar theme starts playing
👍💪💝🇧🇻NATO💖💪👍
Mi avión favorito el f35
Would anyone know what that massive lump on top over the engine is?
Brake parachute in modification for Norway.
NORWEGEN THX FOR HELP !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Incredible technology! Definitely beats a balloon 🎈 😭 lol
That was F22 not F35...
At the end, what kind of weapon was the guy to the right carrying? Was it a machine gun or something?
Just noticed that these Norwegian F-35's have some type of pod affixed on the top rear of the fuselage. I've never seen this before on any other F-35's, would anyone out there happen to know what they are?
Brake Chute,only Norwegian F35A's have this fitted at present.
@@stuartjobling9360 Thank you.
@@Gsmooth10455 yeah, the chute makes it easier to land in slippery icy climate. Other countries are looking to have them on their F35s and I assume Finland might want to have them when they get their F35s as well.
@@phillipbanes5484 Wrong, the Norwegian jets have this configuration because of slippery tarmacs during winters. But Finland might indeed use the same system to be able to conduct road landings.
@@phillipbanes5484 Norway has never used road bases because it is hard to make a road go straight for several km in our terrain. The chute was put on the F-16 first, now on the F-35 mainly because of the extensive network of civilian airports with short runways that would be utilized in a conflict.
Operational cost per flight hour:
- Gripen E, 9.000$/h
- Rafale, 17.000$/h
- F16 block 50, 18.000$/h
- Eurofighter Typhoon, 20.000$/h
- F/A-18 Super Hornet, 24.000$/h
- F35A, 31.000$/h
Gripen sucks!
F-35A target was $25000 per hour, so $31000 per hour ain't that bad. Far more important is to get Block 4 and FOC. Then we want F-35A availability closer to target.
Flight hour cost is lower priority than that, for maritime patrols and policing we have fleet of Poseidon and looks like we will select MQ-9 Reaper or MQ-9B SeaGuardian as long range drone.
P-8A Poseidon $1050 per hour
MQ-9 Reaper $3500 per hour
MQ-9B SeaGuardian $5000 per hour
Other 4th gen fighters not relevant, we picked F-35 in 2008 and phased out F-16 in 2022.
Those are some nice hangers! It`s good to have some oil & gas reserves.Oh Yeah, the planes aren`t too shabby.
Best fighter
THX for help !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Norwegen thx !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
may the nordic be safe:-)
👍
Si qe me gustaría que 🇨🇴 🇨🇴 🇨🇴 tuviese esos cazas ve ... Ya qe somos buenos en todo ámbito, sólo nos falta estos juguetes y. Chaoooo papáaa
Boa noite amigo, abraços
Nice Nice Nice Nice Nice 💞 💕 💞 💕 💞 💕
Przecież Islandia amii nie ma 🥺🤭😁
Keep the f35 for combat against the CCP.
😅👍👌😅😅👍👌😅🤔
00:05-00:10 - Такое ощущение будто съёмка ускорена где в 1,3 раза: F-35 не поиспособлен к такому быстрому полёту (и не только быстрому, но и низкому: так низко летать над горными вершинами - небезопасно, - но только от такого низкого полёта может получиться ощущение скорости полёта в действительности, которое создаётся увеличением скорости видео).
В общем, очередные уловки специалистов по монтажу видео! ;-)
Совершенно верно. Именно такое ощущение у любой жертвы российской пропаганды, в сказках которой F35 "не приспособлен". Это первая стадия принятия неизбежного, отрицание.
Продолжайте мечтать, вы явно бредите.
@@Gsmooth10455 Спасибо. Продолжу.
@@Gsmooth10455 Спасибо. Продолжу.
@@user-hh8vu1tv6k Дело не только в контрафактном дошираке, но и в дрянных специях, которые к нему прилагались: от них так "ускоряется", что отшибает чувство скорости и теряется ощущение этой самой скорости. В этом-то как раз и кроется опасность от того 'доширака"...
(Я иронизирую слегка.)
偉大的北約軍官們加油啊？
Four PMCs fighters, Wagner, from Finland laid down their heads in battle. Eternal memory to them! Fighters against Ukrainian Nazism.
They fought fascism as part of a British battalion commanded by a retired US Marine General...
russian cope. You will lose the war in Ukraine.
Wagner lol….
That was propaganda btw. I know you don’t wanna believe it though. The fact that you can’t name him or show him is proof enough.
Finnish and British volunteers, led by a retired American Marine Corps general fighting for Russia in Ukraine?
Russian propaganda truly is scraping the bottom of the barrel, trying to reach out to the most gullible and naive to believe this.
Snow seem so fake
Истребитель су57 посылать не надо
Ваш самолет F35 падает сам по себе из-за множества неполадок, он тоже упал в море и некоторое время назад разбился при посадке. 😅😅
How many Su57’s were built? Like 3😂😂😂😂
Lol smartest Russian bot
🐷🇷🇺🐷
They sacrifice the aircraft's stealth capability to accommodate two AIM-9X missiles
Air policing is opposite of stealth. The whole purpose is to be seen.
Did the USA gave the F35 to norway for free, for their good cooperation in destroying the Nord Stream Pipelines ?
Most Americans would gladly give it to Ukraine for free.
Think before you ask, would the USA ever give someone looking to buy Military equipment from them, there equipment for free? I don’t think so.
I think Norway bought them
Norway helped build the F-35 from the beginning. That's why the Norwegian flag is on it among others.
lets see if that will help when the time comes to pay for what you did on nordstream
No match for S-400. But Norway has big money to spend - from oil and gas. (Nord Stream sabotage 😉)
yeah and Stoltenberg was a CIA asset during the Vietnam war (when he was an underage teenager). The Hersh report was the biggest load of crap I have ever seen. Btw USA would not need Norwegian help to blow up the pipeline, so why involve Norway at all?
LOL....S-400 can't even shoot down a F-16😆
Lol the s-400 would not be able to shoot down many stealth planes
It even fails at normal jets
I think it would be a bigger chance that the f35 would destroy the s400