It is for this exact reason i stay away from SS, SG and DSC bats especially when purchasing online. Middling the ball with a full width bat is already hard enough
Marc, this was your best ever review. Very honest, forthright and helpful for anyone who is chasing those Player Edition bats. I like the way you try and look after the club player and keep bat spending on perspective. Thank you
Thanks James. I’m happy with the video from a technical perspective. Not happy that I had to be so brutal to a local players bat. I tried to mix in some humour and be balanced. Overall its a good watch.
I recently just picked up a TC1260, the retailer was pushing me a player edition as I asked for suggestions on which bat they recommended. I politely denied because I truly believe these “player edition” bats are just marketing BS.
I am a 10 year retired cricketer and this is the first ever bat review I’ve watched. Very interesting and informative. Seems like the marketing spin on cricket bats is similar to golf clubs these days. My 2 best ever bats were a GN750 that Robin Smith rejected on weight and a GN1000 I believe. Thanks for the video.
Hi John, Robin Smith and a GN750. Not seen either unless 750 was the grade eg 500, 750, 1000. My favourites…GN Ultimate 1000 LE hollow core, B3 Beluga grade 3 at 2.9 and potentially my Rob Pack if I make it back. Your not wrong on the marketing for the big brands and it works.
@@CricketBatInfo Yes I believe it was stickered up as a Ultimate 750. No idea what it would’ve been if Robin had used it. I watched your recent video on the Screaming Cat and remembered I had one of the early ones but it didn’t look much like the one you reviewed. Had the pleasure of playing some cricket with Julian at Subi Floreat in Perth in the late 80’s when he was getting started.
A great review Marc! Disappointed for players that end up with bats like this, as in my view they could have spent a 1/4 of the price to get similar a playing bat( not looks or profile)..
Absolutely agree...across most brands the same sort of nonsense is going on. Call it a players bat and charge 25% extra. i personally found new SF bats to be reasonably priced and have value for money...
Would rather this option than overdrying or concaving This is the exact same as my 9.0 grade 4/5 bat just prettier willow and some laser engraving Tbh all this measuring and comparing doesn’t mean squat when it boils down to it If you buy a player edition bat your just falling for the marketing bs
I try not to show biased content and just focus on the bat in front of me at the time and share any thoughts in the videos as I film. If I only liked one brand then why would people send me others? You can see in my playlist and my old Facebook albums I have purchased bats from all over the world. Many B3 in the past because I liked the idea of picking the stickers I liked. Don't own any now, but miss my first B3 Beluga 1 Stripe. I have not purchased a bat since 2020. I won a GM Stokes Players and sold it and explained why in that video. If you follow the channel you would understand my process.
Looks like Warner edition.. Has excessive sanding? Def not good, unless warner uses that specification and its a legit copy.. He didn't use kids width when he used GN tho.
Sanding joke. Nice. 😅. Warner had those huge 50-65 mm edge bats. I think this shape is similar to the Sikander, which was basically a kaboom copy with a round toe
@@CricketBatInfo That's not the fault of any brands . Its our fault. We demand in market light weight with 40mm edges and full profile and light weight. That's happening becouse cricket is developing super fast . I have seen more expensive bats then that and still they are very bad . Shortage of wood Too much demand We can't blame any brands. We are demanding too much that's it !!
Are all the dsc bats like this? I’ve always wanted one because dsc is the initials of my full name so i always thought it would be cool. But I’ve always used gray-Nicholls and anything else feels wrong.
I have reviewed 3 player editions and I think a earlier model. Now ypu actually don’t expect me to know if all are like that. Watch the videos and also look on MyCricketGear on Instagram i think he has done a few. The Warner was not a good example. Narrowing is common on bats lately because everyone only sees edge size. Check the channel page playlists for players bats and dsc
Poor show from dsc..the quality of the Indian made bats seems to be dropping dramatically wouldn't surprise me if ss, sg, mrf are doing the same thing. Don't know about the width but the so called players bats these companies are selling are nowhere near what they used to be. New balance seem to be churning out some good bats still. Keep up the good work Marc 👏
These brand just make fool of all the customers. Charging the price of SH bat for the size 5 bat by just engraving The Bull. The same applicable for SS and SG. Boutique brands are much better than them as they charge realistic for what they call grade 1+ bat.
There's this cricket dealer in Houston, TX who keeps swearing by David Warner bats and how he wasn't able to keep them in stock. First it was the GNs then the spartans, now dsc. He keeps telling us there is one guy in the US who buys 10 of these once they're out
These player editions are everywhere, people need to realise the mistake they are making in buying them. Not worth the money at all in my opinion. A B3 2 stripe bat would do the job any time and will save you a lot.
Not good to see and completely take your point. I love your content but don't you think some consumers and reviewers are causing this behaviour from brands? 38mm edge, 60mm spine isn't big?! The more 'specs' are constantly promoted and discussed in this way, the more brands will do this kind of thing to hit them. I don't agree this should be a Player's Edition, but most people wouldn't care about the narrow back as its got decent edges and nice grains, which is something they've been told or come to conclusion of (as its measured to within a point of a mil in every video), that this makes a good bat.
Yeah but without the offset and the narrowing its not a 38 mm edge is it? I measure each bat as a point of consistency for every video. I don’t get off on it lol. Some of my favourite bats had less than 38 mm edges. The fad is full 40 mm to meet the gauge and without measuring you cannot see what is going on.
So why are people measuring the edges, toe, splice etc to within points of mm's then? Each video I see online nowadays is mainly about edge size, spine height, specs etc. When did good bats come down to measurements? The more videos concentrate on this, the more manufacturers will do to dupe people by using tactics, which the same people who then complain about them, are partly the reason they manufacturers are using them. If nobody measured 'specs' and went off quality of willow, workmanship, quality of handles and feel etc, then bats would be all the better for it and people wouldn't think 38mm + edges and 67mm spines etc were what they needed.
A word of advice. It's preferable not to have music continuously playing in the background whilst your reviewing the bat. It suggests what you have to say isn't important, causing you to shout to be heard. It's like a radio station. In addition you sigh too often, implying you're both bored and tired.
And another thing, let's face the truth Gray Nicolls Australia, didn't want to know David Warner., after South Africa 4 years ago. With good reason. That's the real reason he isn't with them anymore.
Tbh that whole fiasco cost them a fortune. They had a container of the new model kabooms ready to send out and got stuck with them. I reviewed a unreleased one. Probably the only kaboom i liked. Stickers were always yuck
Well unfortunately customers are easily convinced by not only the brands but also the retailers who are equally to blame if not more so, players bats are only a thing if a player gives you one of his bats and everything else is spin and marketing with a massively inflated cost. The retailers are pedalling this rubbish and are they kicking back and warning customers well of course not, most of them only care about the money and also don’t forget a lot of these retailers actually have zero knowledge of the industry or why do they push this crap.
It is for this exact reason i stay away from SS, SG and DSC bats especially when purchasing online. Middling the ball with a full width bat is already hard enough
I feel the same way
Thanks for sharing
Marc, this was your best ever review. Very honest, forthright and helpful for anyone who is chasing those Player Edition bats. I like the way you try and look after the club player and keep bat spending on perspective. Thank you
Thanks James. I’m happy with the video from a technical perspective. Not happy that I had to be so brutal to a local players bat. I tried to mix in some humour and be balanced. Overall its a good watch.
I recently just picked up a TC1260, the retailer was pushing me a player edition as I asked for suggestions on which bat they recommended. I politely denied because I truly believe these “player edition” bats are just marketing BS.
lol
I am a 10 year retired cricketer and this is the first ever bat review I’ve watched. Very interesting and informative. Seems like the marketing spin on cricket bats is similar to golf clubs these days. My 2 best ever bats were a GN750 that Robin Smith rejected on weight and a GN1000 I believe. Thanks for the video.
Hi John, Robin Smith and a GN750. Not seen either unless 750 was the grade eg 500, 750, 1000. My favourites…GN Ultimate 1000 LE hollow core, B3 Beluga grade 3 at 2.9 and potentially my Rob Pack if I make it back. Your not wrong on the marketing for the big brands and it works.
@@CricketBatInfo Yes I believe it was stickered up as a Ultimate 750. No idea what it would’ve been if Robin had used it. I watched your recent video on the Screaming Cat and remembered I had one of the early ones but it didn’t look much like the one you reviewed. Had the pleasure of playing some cricket with Julian at Subi Floreat in Perth in the late 80’s when he was getting started.
A great review Marc! Disappointed for players that end up with bats like this, as in my view they could have spent a 1/4 of the price to get similar a playing bat( not looks or profile)..
Thanks Nicholas
Absolutely agree...across most brands the same sort of nonsense is going on. Call it a players bat and charge 25% extra. i personally found new SF bats to be reasonably priced and have value for money...
Thanks
this is first accurate bat review on DSC David warner... i own this bat... this review is spot on its defects
Nova day's bats are light and long sweet spot, but not filling the guage
Ok
Would rather this option than overdrying or concaving
This is the exact same as my 9.0 grade 4/5 bat just prettier willow and some laser engraving
Tbh all this measuring and comparing doesn’t mean squat when it boils down to it
If you buy a player edition bat your just falling for the marketing bs
First time I have seen you comment. Noted
Make sure you consider subscribing. Enjoy
So what brands do you think do a players edition bat well then? GM, Gray Nics??
Why do you need a player edition? My playlists show what i have owned and used and own now. I don’t need someone else’s name on my bat
Fair play… doesn’t really answer the question though. But each to their own I suppose
I try not to show biased content and just focus on the bat in front of me at the time and share any thoughts in the videos as I film.
If I only liked one brand then why would people send me others?
You can see in my playlist and my old Facebook albums I have purchased bats from all over the world. Many B3 in the past because I liked the idea of picking the stickers I liked. Don't own any now, but miss my first B3 Beluga 1 Stripe.
I have not purchased a bat since 2020.
I won a GM Stokes Players and sold it and explained why in that video.
If you follow the channel you would understand my process.
Looks like Warner edition.. Has excessive sanding? Def not good, unless warner uses that specification and its a legit copy.. He didn't use kids width when he used GN tho.
Sanding joke. Nice. 😅. Warner had those huge 50-65 mm edge bats. I think this shape is similar to the Sikander, which was basically a kaboom copy with a round toe
@@CricketBatInfo That's not the fault of any brands . Its our fault. We demand in market light weight with 40mm edges and full profile and light weight. That's happening becouse cricket is developing super fast . I have seen more expensive bats then that and still they are very bad .
Shortage of wood
Too much demand
We can't blame any brands. We are demanding too much that's it !!
Are all the dsc bats like this? I’ve always wanted one because dsc is the initials of my full name so i always thought it would be cool. But I’ve always used gray-Nicholls and anything else feels wrong.
I have reviewed 3 player editions and I think a earlier model. Now ypu actually don’t expect me to know if all are like that. Watch the videos and also look on MyCricketGear on Instagram i think he has done a few. The Warner was not a good example. Narrowing is common on bats lately because everyone only sees edge size. Check the channel page playlists for players bats and dsc
@@CricketBatInfo I only meant if all the dsc’s you had reviewed have had that same problem. Thanks for the reply though!!
Thanks for the review 👍
Thanks for the message
Poor show from dsc..the quality of the Indian made bats seems to be dropping dramatically wouldn't surprise me if ss, sg, mrf are doing the same thing. Don't know about the width but the so called players bats these companies are selling are nowhere near what they used to be. New balance seem to be churning out some good bats still. Keep up the good work Marc 👏
Appreciate the comment Rob. Mind boggles what DSC think about their customers
Totally in agreement with you
Thanks
Great review Marc 👍👍
Thanks Ben
These brand just make fool of all the customers. Charging the price of SH bat for the size 5 bat by just engraving The Bull. The same applicable for SS and SG. Boutique brands are much better than them as they charge realistic for what they call grade 1+ bat.
These brands forgets that, it's the customers money, which they give out for the sponsorship. The Bull (Bullshit)
Appreciate your comment
There's this cricket dealer in Houston, TX who keeps swearing by David Warner bats and how he wasn't able to keep them in stock. First it was the GNs then the spartans, now dsc. He keeps telling us there is one guy in the US who buys 10 of these once they're out
Scalpers. Create a shortage and the sell for more. Try buying a PC GPU atm
The very least you expect from a 'players' edition is the full 4.25 inches! Shocking.
Not lately
These player editions are everywhere, people need to realise the mistake they are making in buying them. Not worth the money at all in my opinion. A B3 2 stripe bat would do the job any time and will save you a lot.
I see many, but not sure every amateur is interested. Appreciate your feedback
Not good to see and completely take your point. I love your content but don't you think some consumers and reviewers are causing this behaviour from brands? 38mm edge, 60mm spine isn't big?! The more 'specs' are constantly promoted and discussed in this way, the more brands will do this kind of thing to hit them. I don't agree this should be a Player's Edition, but most people wouldn't care about the narrow back as its got decent edges and nice grains, which is something they've been told or come to conclusion of (as its measured to within a point of a mil in every video), that this makes a good bat.
Yeah but without the offset and the narrowing its not a 38 mm edge is it? I measure each bat as a point of consistency for every video. I don’t get off on it lol. Some of my favourite bats had less than 38 mm edges.
The fad is full 40 mm to meet the gauge and without measuring you cannot see what is going on.
So why are people measuring the edges, toe, splice etc to within points of mm's then? Each video I see online nowadays is mainly about edge size, spine height, specs etc. When did good bats come down to measurements? The more videos concentrate on this, the more manufacturers will do to dupe people by using tactics, which the same people who then complain about them, are partly the reason they manufacturers are using them. If nobody measured 'specs' and went off quality of willow, workmanship, quality of handles and feel etc, then bats would be all the better for it and people wouldn't think 38mm + edges and 67mm spines etc were what they needed.
Wow, a small men's long blade... 😂
Bahahahaha
Harrow bat?
I guess so. But sold for 66000 INR so it's an adult bat SH
C'mon...lift ya game DSC.
This was painful to watch. That bat is too damn narrow
Yep
can someone tag flog Warner
🤣
A word of advice. It's preferable not to have music continuously playing in the background whilst your reviewing the bat. It suggests what you have to say isn't important, causing you to shout to be heard. It's like a radio station. In addition you sigh too often, implying you're both bored and tired.
Yep
And another thing, let's face the truth Gray Nicolls Australia, didn't want to know David Warner., after South Africa 4 years ago. With good reason. That's the real reason he isn't with them anymore.
Yep. He kept flogging all the sandpaper.
Tbh that whole fiasco cost them a fortune. They had a container of the new model kabooms ready to send out and got stuck with them. I reviewed a unreleased one. Probably the only kaboom i liked. Stickers were always yuck
@@CricketBatInfo yes I agree, the Kaboom stickers where horrible, didn't have any appeal at all.
Well unfortunately customers are easily convinced by not only the brands but also the retailers who are equally to blame if not more so, players bats are only a thing if a player gives you one of his bats and everything else is spin and marketing with a massively inflated cost.
The retailers are pedalling this rubbish and are they kicking back and warning customers well of course not, most of them only care about the money and also don’t forget a lot of these retailers actually have zero knowledge of the industry or why do they push this crap.