LIVE: Boyfriend Cop Murder Trial - MA v. Karen Read - Day 8
Вставка
- Опубліковано 21 вер 2024
- Karen Read is accused of driving drunk and hitting her boyfriend, Boston police officer John O'Keefe, before leaving him to die in January 2022. Read is now facing several charges, including second-degree murder for the death of O'Keefe. Read claims that she is the victim of a massive frame-up by state and local police.
Get 50% off of confidential background reports at www.truthfinde...
Subscribe to Law&Crime Network: bit.ly/LawAndC...
STAY UP-TO-DATE WITH THE LAW&CRIME NETWORK:
Watch Law&Crime Network on UA-camTV: bit.ly/3td2e3y
Where To Watch Law&Crime Network: bit.ly/3akxLK5
Sign Up For Law&Crime's Daily Newsletter: bit.ly/LawandC...
Read Fascinating Articles From Law&Crime Network: bit.ly/3td2Iqo
For Advertising Inquiries, Please Contact: sales@lawandcrime.com
For Licensing Inquiries, Please Contact: licensing@lawandcrime.com
LAW&CRIME NETWORK SOCIAL MEDIA:
Instagram: / lawandcrime
Twitter: / lawcrimenetwork
Facebook: / lawandcrime
Twitch: / lawandcrimenetwork
TikTok: / lawandcrime
LAW&CRIME NETWORK PODCASTS: lawandcrime.co...
SUBSCRIBE TO ALL OF LAW&CRIME NETWORK UA-cam CHANNELS:
Main Channel: / @lawandcrime
Law&Crime Shorts: / @lawandcrimeshorts
Channel B: / @lawandcrimetrials
Channel C: / @lawandcrimebodycam
I have some friends and distant relatives who are police officers. One of the strangest things to me in this trial so far is. You have EMTs, Fire, Police, lights, etc, all going on outside your home, and a man's body, a woman in a frantic situation yelling and crying. You also know who these people are. You're a police officer, whether local or out-of-town cop, but it's all happening in your front yard. You never go outside to see what's going on. You never come outside to help and see if they need any assistance. I'm not a cop, and if this was going on outside my home, I would go outside. A cop's intuition is that much more typically. My point is unless you are hiding something or not getting involved intentionally. So strange!!
Are you saying there was a fight or argument between O’Keefe and Read? If yes, maybe they’ve seen it all before and didn’t want to get involved. Who knows. But to suggest they knowingly left their friend and colleague in the snow to die is too far of a stretch.
You are delusional. They are talking about when read was hysterical when the cops were there. And yes as a retired LEO i do believe all the individuals in the house done this. ABSOLUTELY
@@rickc3456if they had anything to do with his death why would they leave him on their own lawn does not make sense and the fact that she actually admitted to hitting him means nothing to you, the fact that his DNA was found on her broken tail light her friend that was charged for witness intimidation the kids statements that all they did was argue, her drunk driving all that means she’s innocent and just because he was found on someone else’s property, that property where he wanted to go and she didn’t they beat him and left him there to die
They were asleep. And once they woke up, the ambulance was gone.
@@anitavarley1975 I think there is reasonable doubt…but who knows for sure …
If I’m the O’Keefe family I’m really starting to have questions about who killed my loved one 😵💫
Definitely. I mean he was an angry cartoon character that was killed because he got angry people were on his lawn. Riveting stuff
I think all the witnesses should be on trial for DUI.
Karen 𝒊𝒔 on trial. (But for something else.)
@@mollykillarney2419 actually part of her charges include driving impaired. the male witness did say he walked home though
@@doragreen3887 but that other guy from the first bar who did an Irish exit drank 6 beers and left to pick up his kids at 2 different places.
@@doragreen3887 of course he said that! Because in 1994 he killed a student while driving drunk!
Numerous cops, ATF agent etc. don’t need to worry about getting a DUI. Now we know their “brothers in blue” will cover for them, even if one of their own dies.
With a corrupt judge & prosecutor too.
Trial was supposed to go until 1pm today. Right in the middle of cross examination of a prosecution witness that is getting cornered in another lie the judge abruptly ends the day at just 12:30 ! What happened to “ Wasting Time” ? Now this witness has to come back to court tomorrow when she could’ve been finished today if the judge just let defense finish their cross. Seems to me that the judge threw witness a lifeline to get her story straight.
that judge is clearly corrupt. after a day or day i said to myself, calm down will see later...but yeah she's clearly corrupt. she strike every reality check questions from the defense
This was absolutely disgusting and unacceptable. I can't believe the judge gets away with so much obvious bias in this case. I wonder how many innocent people are sitting in jail because of her meddling.
Mistrial
She's helping the prosecution so much it's unbelievable
Yeah I don't understand why the judge doesn't just let the witness end and not have to come back. It's ridiculous and I would be mad if I had to come back for a few extra minutes the next day
Im still waiting for any evidence proving she purposely killed this man...
Same. Not one thing yet!
She admitted to hitting him his DNA was found on the broken tail light from her vehicle
@@anitavarley1975again…. That is not evidence because it was lies and planted evidence. Any 6 year old could see through this frame job and the corruption.
@@anitavarley1975 her saying “I hit him” could have been admission they had a fight, she slapped him and regretted it. She could have been asking it, “I hit him?” If she was tired and confused that because of the snow she was worried that she might have hit him. Or maybe the other people killed him and told her she hit him, so she repeated it.
I know I’m late to the party for this trial, but so far there’s very little evidence she killed him, meanwhile each witness the prosecution puts on is feeling more and more evasive and sketchy.
@@prizefighter7607this Anita varley person is probably related to the Alberts. The evidence looks tainted and planted. Prosecution has not given evidence she hit him. His body injuries are not consistent with being hit by a car. Her saying she hit him and this is her fault is probably her regretting a argument they had that night and her leaving him at the Alberts since she was his ride.
This trial is a joke! It needs to be thrown out!
Why is the Defendant lawyer not allowed to ask about communication that was being had with Albert Family?
Because the state is corrupt!
Objection your honor, this is bad for my case
The Judge is related to either the Albert's or the McCabe's. She is the Auntie making sure Karen is found guilty for the murder her relatives committed!
Because it's hearsay. You can't repeat what someone said. They have to testify themselves.
@@KayInMaine really? Is that true or are you just being sarcastic?
The judge interrupting testimony and ending court abruptly is so insane to me. 😮 wow
Tuesdays and Thursdays are half days and the Judge has other cases and obligations. It wasn't "abruptly" to the jurors or attorneys. It's been this way the entire trial.
Crazy! I was a litigator (retired now), but I have never seen that done or experienced it. Momentum is huge esp on cross. Breaks are planned in advance or judges ask lawyers so the breaks are properly timed for the flow of questions.
kharmon, lol, not true. She doesn't have other cases in the middle of a murder trial. Court is just lazy on a regular basis.
@@16MedicRN thank you so much! So many people think that she’s hearing traffic tickets or something during this major murder trial.
Has this court put in a full day’s work even once during this trial?? Geez. And what the heck is with just abruptly ending in the middle of a line of questioning??
Who chews gum when they testify in a trial that's gained a lot of notoriety and is televised???? Weirdo, LOL...........🙄🙄🙄
Right!! I just commented about this.
A cigarette smoker who's anxious about lying and can't light up 😂
Agree
The judge ALWAYS wanting to end/disrupt absolutely RIVETING testimony JUST WHEN WE START GETTING SOMEWHERE FOR GOODNESS SAKE!! I want to pull my hair out by the damn root with this judge!
I'm so sick of hearing "you're all set" . She gets on my nerves!
Judge is possibly the most corrupt individual here. It’s disgusting.
Her courtroom and she is running the schedule..
She only calls for a break or lunch when the Defense is talking
@@Bunny-ur8fdhow is she corrupt? Because Karen is guilty and you hate that? What has she done corrupt?
WHY IS THE JUDGE STOPPING THE DEFENSE DURING A STRONG MOMENT OF CROSS?? She is CONSTANTLY interrupting the defense, It really seems like she is biased too! These are questions and answers the jurors need to know! And why does she keep cutting the day so short??!
Tuesday & Thursday are short court days for this entire trial
I feel like she wants people to rest when things get too heated. She is respecting the mental health of those affected… she knows how hard those benches everyone is sitting on are too 😂
100 percent
judge is shady. helping the state all the time
Is she being paid off?😮
you are delusional the judge was anti prosecutors the day before yesterday ....... sorry but you're grasping on nonsens .... watch again LOL
@@Chrisje674 rubbish you clearly have not been watching the trial or know anything about the history between her and defence team who petitioned to have her removed for her blatant bias. Facts
She’s not allowing witness badgering and other ridiculous straws the defense is grasping at. That’s all.
@@yogabee2222doubt she is being paid off. But her history, relationships, and loyalty are clearly informing her bias. Appalling to watch .
I have never seen/heard a judge interject so many times on behalf of a witness, as I have at this trial. I honestly think she’s making things worse for the prosecution. She’s MAKING this look like a cover up. JMO.
She’s acting like a prosecution lawyer
Because it is a coverup imo
The defense attorney is asking questions that are inappropriate and he is skillfully doing it so the jury will hear it. It is a tactic of the defense.
The defence should stick to the rules of statements and evidence then instead of trying to sneak it in when they feel like it
Let us hope the jury has common sense. These people can’t keep their stories and lies straight. The defense is bringing this out in their cross on all of these witnesses. Chris A. knows exactly what went down and he intimately involved in the cover up. I think he is covering for his son, Colin. He was definitely involved. Colin saw an opportunity to do something to John and took it and whether he planned it or it happened that Colon went too far…and ended up beating him to death…and Chris had to go into cover up mode when Colin opened his door that night. Chris is cracking under the defense pressure.
I’ve never seen such a disrespectful court when it comes to the jurors time
Then you are not watching the YSL trial in Atlanta.
I do not like this judge at all..
Why?
@@drmartina6872she is blatantly meddling. And biased. Unprofessionally impatient.
I'm neither sided, I don't know where I stand.. but she is clearly biased to the prosecutor. It's ok for the prosecutor to ask something but when the defense goes into detail on the same question and the prosecutor objects, she allows the objection.
The speed at which she immediatelly says SUSTAINED gives the impression she's anticipating the state's objection.
@@hectornegron9155 except Lally never states a reason for objections, which habitually is so not kosher.
this case is going to remain unsolved. because there is serious doubt with Karen. and they will never invetigate the cops. and the cops messed up the crime scene. so no. i dont see this case getting solved. sorry for the victim's family and the victim.
Hopefully the Feds will uncover the truth
sad but truth
Messing up crime scene does not equal conspiracy between an entire towns police and fire department
@@drmartina6872 Did you even watch the trial?!
I think the fbi is watching this trial and will use it in their investigation. I think they could be busted
Never forget Boston police officer John O'Keefe was assaulted inside the home of Brian Albert and then left outside in the front yard to die in the cold.
Justice for John O'Keefe and Karen Read = The whole of the Albert Clan and their subordinates on trial
That hasn’t been said in this trial. So the viewers wouldn’t know unless they have watched other stuff like grand jury’s etc
IMO, it has been established there is no conspiracy nor cover up. The only cover up is what the defense is trying to prove. Unfortunately, Karen Read is over charged with murder 2. It is more of a DUI and involuntary manslaughter. JMO
How do you know this?
Were you there? So far zero evidence at all of this actually happening
No sniffs during direct. The nose will physically swell, causing itching & repeated sniffing when LYING.
Chris Albert is quite deceptive during cross: 1:28:18 1:30:15 1:33:05 1:33:43 1:34:09 1:35:25 1:35:30 1:36:12 1:40:54 1:44:43 1:45:50 1:47:57 1:54:14 1:54:14 1:56:09 1:56:07 1:56:15 1:56:23 1:56:39 1:57:04 1:57:59 1:58:19 1:58:28 1:58:57 1:59:46 2:00:35 2:01:15 2:02:25 2:03:03 2:04:29 2:04:30
2:04:46 2:05:31 2:07:22
2:07:58 2:11:01
Yes I’m insane!😆
Love it!
THE JUDGE (Auntie who is related to some of the prosecution's witnesses!) NEEDS TO BE DISBARRED FOR HER BIAS ALONE!!!!
We should all report her to the state bar...that way they will have no other choice but to intervene and do something.
Which witness?
What!!
Most ridiculous thing I’ve ever heard…she’s not just an attorney..she’s a judge..it would take more than disbarring…she’s done nothing wrong..tell the defense to QUIT BREAKING THE RULES…
@@TXFireChick1go ahead, all you Karen fans do it, let’s see how far you get…this judge has done nothing wrong..the defense, on the other hand, keeps trying where their silly questions, their trickery, and badgering. Tell THEM to follow the rules and then the judge won’t have to intervene..her courtroom..she’s running the show…go ahead..see where it gets all of you..Karen is guilty. This conspiracy is a JOKE.
I feel bad for Okeefe family. By this time they have to wonder what really happened to their son and brother. Reasonable doubt for sure. No search of the house where their son on lawn where he was found dead. Red solo cups no shoe.
the cop said he didn't have PC to search the house....with a body in the yard!!! He actually said that in front of the jury😆
It's not complicated considering she completely cut out any communication with them the moment he died. Speaks for itself.
@@Anna-cx4tgagreed even though the family tried to remain connected to her and why would also completely remove everything that belongs to you, in just 10 minutes she’s entered his house never spoke with his family removed all she owned and the family never had any contact from her again
@@Anna-cx4tgexactly, she left those kids that morning, without a second thought and never, ever looked back. She knew what she did, even if it was an accident from driving impaired. However, the more I watch this trial, the more I think, she could have beat the crap out of him with her drink glass from that night. The cuts on his arm could be from him trying to defend himself while she slashed at him with a broken glass. Maybe he turned to walk away, and she threw the glass, which hit the back of his head, he hit the ground & she left him there to freeze.
@@Anna-cx4tgnot for nothing but they took her phone immediately. I don’t know anyone’s phone numbers by heart except for my immediate family’s
I feel so bad for Miss Read and for John O'Keefe's family.
For Karen (and her family) bc she's facing life in prison for a crime the state has shown no proof of and for the O'Keefe's bc they may never find out what really happened to their son.
Can't imagine living their lives from now on thinking whether that person who says hello every time they see each other and they probably consider part of their family is the real killer of their son and at the same time probably hating Karen for what they were told she did.
News flash....2nd degree murder is NOT life
My heart aches!! She's never been aloud to grieve
@@geechis8883 She can't even smile a bit bc somehow that would make her guilty of this crime.
@@Indiartworksdepending on someone's age it very well could be. Adam Montgomery just got convicted of 2nd degree murder and got 45 years. He's 34, that's a life sentence.
She shouldn’t have hit him then should she unless it was someone else that hit him with her car
Your on a diet yet drinking and eating fried tenders and potato skins🤔
And drinking
And eating fried tenders.
I was thinking the same. I didn't want to eat pizza, so I went to the bar and ordered beer and apps. 😂😂
Hilarious, isn't it?
It's for charity😂😂😂
WHY IS THE JUDGE SABOTAGING THE DEFENSE!? She interrupted a perfectly smooth going cross and stopped court EARLY. She needs to be replaced, this is RIDICULOUS.
The defense was not following the rules laid out. It's their strategy to push info out there knowing it will be sustained.
You’re absolutely correct!
She is terrible. Watching from the beginning of this video she shows up like she thinks she's a beauty queen, swaying back and forth...constantly fidgeting in her chair and breathing heavy into her mic...what the what?!?!
At some point, it will become an appellate issue. It’s her courtroom, her rules; but she is not permitted to disrupt the proceedings in a manner that detracts from the party’s ability to prosecute or defend. She’s been way too active (like referees not allowing players to play). Not allowing the attorneys to state reasons for objections already risks appellate review, and now she’s shutting down questioning in the middle of - & not to enhance the flow of presentation or for the efficient use of time & resources; indeed, it’s very possible that the witness being examined could have finished today. But, in not even bothering to inquire, the judge has done what she has admonished the lawyers not to do & the witness will need to return tomorrow! As for not following “the rules” - that’s bs. A question is not objectionable bc it impeaches someone! Tough questions are not objectionable in & of themselves! In sustaining the incessant objections to tough hitting questions, she’s playing sides & unnecessarily risking reversal & remand, if not reprimand, by an appellate court. The whole thing is on the verge of a circus.
@@IAmALawyerToo The judge is allowed to intervene in the defense’s tactic to cross boundaries. Just because the defense is relentless in their approach to push a narrative onto witnesses does not mean the judge needs to just allow it.
The fact that people are defending the defense’s behavior and shaming the judge is wild to me.
Just the other day, the defense was allowed to present a photo to a witness, and they had the report on the page with the photo which was not allowed.🥴
Judge needs to be removed
NONSENSE! Judge has done NOTHING to warrant such a ridiculous claim. And that’s not how trials work.
Please 🙄 She has a strong command of the courtroom. I guess that’s threatening for a whole bunch of people because it’s constantly being complained about.
@@bridgetives359 judge is a crook.....her brother represented the witness that was on the stand today when he ran over a guy and killed him.......grounds to recuse but she refused......which will later come back to bite her....guaranteed
Petition for a better judge 😐😒🙄
Judge cut off defense cross until tomorrow of last witness just as he was closing in on her “I don’t remember “ regarding Proctors. Breaking defense rhythm. But not before he scored 3 major 🔥 points.
She breaks for lunch only when Defense is up as well
judge harps on not wasting the juror's precious time yet she her self is a freakin' "SideBar Sally"!
Sidebars don't waste the jury's time. They're part of the trial.
correct ......and only wants to work 4-6 hrs a day.............laziest judge and court I've ever seen
@@mollykillarney2419not this many…..she calls a sidebar like every 1-5 min on avg.
Chris needs to stop the damn sniffing. Shows he’s nervous and it’s annoying enough that the jury will think he has something to hide. Shady dude.
I was looking for this comment! Totally agree!
He definitely sniffs something
Is it a drug addiction? He does it mostly when he’s upset though.
Probably a coke head
That’s what happens when you take the powder before testifying 😂
Auntie Bev is as CROOKED as they come
Pizza guy has totally different attitude talking with prosecutor than with defense. Hhhmmmmm
It's better for him if it doesn't show, but ... I'd be dang miffed if a dude cross examining me thought I'd aided in the murder of someone.
Omg !!! I thought it was just me ! Put up a total defense the moment the defense attorney started! Ridiculous!!!
@@mollykillarney2419 then he shouldn't have aided in a murder
@@PhillyDovereally? where was that displayed in the evidence/trial?
He’s shady af
Defense Lawyer: “so you got home, you didn’t dr…….”
Chris Albert: “nope” (sniff)
Defense Lawyer: “didn’t drink any water?”
Chris Albert: “nope” (sniff) (scratch face) (pulls ear)
I thought he was calling out baseball plays with the ear pull. Shaaadddddy
Sniff, sniff, rub nose, straighten shirt, straighten collar, touch face, sniff , sniff = LYING
What if anything have you noticed about Judge Aunt Bev’s blatant bias
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
There isn’t ANY. That’s ridiculous.
@aldon Nothing. Perhaps you’re new to how trials work ? And I mean that in the nicest way. Lots of people want the defendant to be innocent or have decided ahead of time that she is innocent purely because she is female combined with the belief that all police are corrupt - that’s my opinion based on reading comments. It’s not possible to say she is innocent or guilty. The trial is ongoing. The jury weigh the evidence. The judge follows the rules and as much as it may rub the ‘innocent no need for a trial’ brigade the wrong way there will be a verdict based on evidence. The defense are pushing the boundaries and rightly so. I’m sure the prosecution will do the same. Phew. I await the hate.
Funny that only Chris Albert and his wife saw Karen pull out a glass from her coat. The other woman who spent the evening speaking with her and Jen and were sitting together never saw that.
She and her creepy husband are very sus
Did anyone else pickup on the video that when John left the bar, he put down his beer and picked up Karen’s glass and walked out of the bar?
You’re high as F!!,
That was surprising. I hadn’t considered that possibility. Weird too like the old saying goes ‘beer before liquor, you’re gonna be sicker, liquor before beer, you’re in the clear.’ But it did answer one of my questions.🤷🏻♀️
I’m wondering if it’s because that was prob the glass that she had brought with her, so he grabbed it before leaving so it didn’t get left there?..
@@ItzMzJulez2Uprobably because it was snowing out and he didn’t want her to be carrying the glass..
In case it was slippery or maybe he did that all the time for her.
@@TMxo My thoughts have been all over the place with this since yesterday!
I assumed he finished her drink.🤦🏻♀️
Karen Read gave Chris Albert that death stare. The I do not fear you or anyone else on the stand.
So what? Who cares?
Cuz she’s innocent
Why would she fear him?! 😂 The conspiracy folks on here are wild
Corruption with the cover-uP is REAL ⚖️
Wish there was an option to love a comment because oooooooft I saw that too! It was an epic stare.
She’s really chewing gum on the stand during a murder trial tf
A person pulls up with donuts and Brian Albert Snr hears it, yet he didn’t hear the sirens from the 3 hours earlier?
There weren’t any sirens as has been testified many times.
Exactly!! I said the same thing to myself. It's these tinny details that show who the real murderer/s are and I don't believe for one second that it is KR.
@@TopCat8877 As soon as Karen is driven from the scene inside a police car, the lights in the Albert's home suddenly went on. Cop outside was talking to an Albert to let them know when it's safe to come out. Meh. Bunch of crooks!
@@KayInMaine 1. Karen left in an ambulance to the hospital. 2.The lights came on when Jen M went in to wake them up as instructed by police. 3. There was no need for anyone from the house to come outside, the police went inside to talk to them.
@@TopCat8877 I thought they said at least one police car, ambulance and fire truck had sirens, unless it was blue lghts..
Due to her unprofessionalism, I wondered how this judge was given the opportunity to preside over this case ...now I think I know.😒
Unprofessionalism?? Oh brother
@@juliec2999 Absolutely -I'm far from alone with this observation. Law professors and lawyers have publicly made remarks regarding her conduct.
This judge is going just fine..,if you’re a Karen read fan it goes along with your conspiracy,,,the judge is great actually..,you need to look at the rules the defense doesn’t seem to want to follow..they are the problems, and I normally love defense attorneys.
@@gigis6790who? Defense attorneys…she is fine. Not one bit unprofessional. It’s her courtroom her show..just because you’re an attorney or law professor doesn’t mean you aren’t biased yourself. She’s guilty!!!
@@PEBBLEZ21 Defense law professors?? I wasn't aware they existed. Lawyers who know the law question her ethics- I don't care if they are defense or prosecuting lawyers as long as they are credible and interested in educating us with an open mind.
I have no opinion of KR. I don't know her nor was I there. I am interested in justice and there is questionable behavior regarding this trial from LE to witnesses and this judge.
There is no value in uneducated comments.
I research questionable ethics. Of course people interested in choosing a "side" will comment accordingly.
Where’s his hat and shoe and jacket ..In that frickin house that’s where
Not sure he had a jacket… but yeah wondering about the hat.
O’Keefe did not have a coat or jacket. If you look at the videos, all he had on was a hoodie type shirt. Plus, nearly everybody said O’Keefe doesn’t wear coats or jackets.
@@DonnaJo3452 where is the missing shoe..and where is the glass from ..not hard to figure out..go to the bar and compare glasses
@@DonnaJo3452what about the hat….guess you missed the hat
@@DonnaJo3452 I believe he may have put coat on after leaving bar in the car, hat may have blown away in wind , shoe came off when hit by Karen,
snow plows may have taken away evidence in early morning.
These are viable questions why is the judge continuing to sustain these questions from being answered but not doing the same on prosecution side? I am a little aggravated by this
Because prosecution is not badgering, employing sarcasm/demeaning tone of voice, or other ridiculous tactics…maybe they will once defense puts on their witnesses. Have you never seen a trial?
Depending on which question, it may be foundation or hearsay.
Usually when the objection happens they give a reason but not here!
@@janeevans1859 They've been instructed by the judge not to.
She's biased being related to some of the key players inside the Albert's house that night/morning.
Chris Albert’s body language and demeanor is so strange..
Strange bc he’s uncomfortable $ LYING!
He SNIFFS repeatedly during cross, very little during direct, just when he’s lying. Very obvious.
This judge is soooo involved in testimony. She hovers over every sentence and involves herself when it’s absolutely not needed. There is no other court I have ever seen do this. I watch a lot of trials and never before has a judge done this
The prosecution doesn't give any reasons for their constant objections.
judge told them not to give grounds
They aren't allowed to...there are no speaking objections!
Hearsay that’s what they are objecting to
I said the same thing… no grounds for the objection is quite improper
Adam Lally said on 5/6 in court (at the 7:23:05 hour mark of the L&C stream) when arguing why the Lapolito case is so far removed/not relevant… Lally says “It was a single incident in which he (Lank) did not witness anything to do with the Albert brothers. Uhh Christopher Albert was never at 34 Fairview Rd on Jan 28th or uhh until much much later in the day of Jan 29th and certainly not at the same time Sergeant Lank was”
Lank said on 5/7 in court (at the 02:09:22 hour mark of the L&C stream) that he went back to Fairview (for the third time) after receiving a call from Jen McCabe shortly after 9am.
Chris Albert said today 5/9 in court (at the 59:00 min mark of the L&C stream) that him and Julie went to Fairview sometime after 9oclock.
By Chris Albert confirming he was at Fairview the morning of Jan 29th with Julie, it proves Adam Lally lied on 5/6 to the court.
this guy is in charge of our town finances...
Vote him out.
Judge appears biased!
Cause that’s her family probably
She’s part of the corruption, too!!
What the heck is the witness Julie Albert doing chewing on something (looks like gum) while she is on the witness stand.. Talk about disrespectful
I agree… she is annoying.
So disrespectful 😮
She's 48 and looks hard as nails
@@yellowduck8061ooff! Thought the same thing! Rough on the edges for 48, damn!
agree...........I thought at one point she was going to start blowing bubbles
So the text messages haven't been extracted? I've never seen a judge say to the jury that they have to decide who the texts are from and to.
EXACTLY! ? ! ? Poor Jurors :( :( :( :(
They know it came from their phones, what she means is that they must decide if they are the ones who actually typed the messages
@@hayleedowns5721 never heard a judge say that in the many trials and much bigger ones than this that I have seen. Probably because it's the first time police let witnesses screenshot their phones and didn't extract the phones' data as they should have done.
If she’s drinking from the same glass as the one she had from the initial place, that means she wasn’t drinking tht much I would suppose.
This judge is just biased 😮
How is he in any office? Didnt he kill someone and charged with vehicular homicide?
Exactly what I was thinking
I’d like to know how, even IF they’d been arguing or angry with each other, how that would prove anything. Witnesses are all saying they were both acting ok, but imagine how she’d be crucified if they had been cranky with each other that evening ?! I understand it would kind of maybe point to “motive”, but if that’s all the prosecution has then it would be ridiculous to send her prison simply because her and the BF were mad at each other. You need more proof than that.
They have more. Patience
@@AcmeRocketHomie, I've been patient for over a week. The same line of questioning over, and over, and over, and over again.
I can’t wait to hear her loving voicemails to John 🤣
@MeliSierra-fw7cf wow! Lack of loving voicemails! Great evidence of a guilty murderer. Are you a lawyer?
I can't believe she is only 48.
Why would the judge not allow defense to ask Julie Albert about the phone call she made to Detective Proctor? She made the call…there is evidence in writing…
Right, basically because they are all lying 🤥 😮
Why does this court have do half days like every other day? The judge complains about the parties not wasting jurors time, aren't there other judges to handle other cases?! Unbelievable.
laziest judge and court in America..........so disrespectful of this juries time
Albert and Higgins(the guys play-fighting in the bar) are very big dudes and they look like fighters. Im thinking either both of them, or one of them is the murderer.
I think it was colin and they egged it on, went to far and panicked
What is Colin’s motive?
You mean the two rolly pollies getting it on?
@@letmework6254he is just a punk who likes to fight
What's with the multiple witnesses chewing gum?
I noticed that myself
Who cares😂
Nerves
Based on my experience, witnesses and court observers are typically advised in advance that gum chewing is not allowed in the courtroom and if the judge or others bring attention to a person doing so, the courtroom bailiff would bring a tissue and request the gum to be disposed of immediately. Perhaps they don’t have the same rules in MA? Or perhaps this court is just really lax?
It’s Bostonians.
This judge and this crooked officer are enough for a preacher to cuss
How does the last female witness remember everything so clearly except for the details of what she talked about with lead investigators sister!? It would be less suspicious if she just owned up and said they were discussing the case.
Convince
The last 20 mins were gold
Finally a witness who doesn’t know when to lie or tell the truth. Lol
System is so corrupt
This isn’t a one-off in small towns of MA. I’m originally from Mass., but moved out of state because it was like this. It’s common there.
funny how chris' wife also says he got home at 12:10 which has already been debunked but she didn't have a chance to discuss it with chris after his testimony. And funny that chris said colin popped his head in but wife says he came in and gave her a kiss. none of her story adds up. she says jen said something happened to john and didn't know if he was okay, and went home to tell chris but according to hubby she came in and told him john was dead
Watch the magic memory comeback tomorrow w/this witness (obviously not by discussing ANYTHING with the Common Wealth)….🙄
Pause at 2:07:53.
Am I the only one thinking about the possibility of the pizza guy's son being involved in this case?
Resume watching.
Did you see there's allegations that the son posted cut up knuckles a few days after the murder
You are not the only one.
@@stefaniefirmin4901 I missed that part but I got the impression the father's demeanor changed a bit as soon as the defense attorney got ready to interrogate him.
Then when he was shown he was wrong in terms of the time he went to sleep and the time his son came home he wasn’t a happy camper at all.
Another thing that got my attention was he didn't take a bath before going to bed after having been in his pizza shop sweating all day. He washed up a bit in the job, went to meet his wife and friends at the bar and then straight to sleep.
"The only one"? Hardly. There are livestreams of the son being accused for 𝐦𝐨𝐧𝐭𝐡𝐬. Death threats, even. Got so bad, he dropped out of college and lost his football scholarship.
@@hectornegron9155 He washed at his pizza shop and changed his clothes.
Pay attention to the heavy sniffs from Chris Albert….. every time he is telling something questionably false…. This man better never play poker. 😬😬😬
Christopher Albert said he ordered “A BEAR” at the bar, Miller lite” ! 😂😂🤣🤣
This case is so odd. Why didn’t the police speak to everyone John was with the day he was found? 2 weeks later is insane! If anyone was in an altercation with John there would be no marks on anyone 2 weeks later!
Pizza guy got real defensive abt his son there..
That he did.
His son's been "through it," honestly. Harassment, death threats, etc. by 𝒔𝒐 𝒎𝒂𝒏𝒚 people. Even at his college campus. Got so bad he gave up his football scholarship and dropped out. 🙁
@@mollykillarney2419 He wasn’t thinking about A football scholarships when he was flipping people off, throwing beer cans on peoples property, running over peoples lawns and running amuck 🤷🏻♀️ His father seems like he can’t be trusted and is covering up either his sons crime, his brothers, or his friends.. either way.. bad things happen to bad people
@@mollykillarney2419poor guy 🙄
I'm not sure why there is a prosecutor when the judge is doing the job for them. She constantly interrupts the defense, objecting and constant sidebar to throw the momentum of the defense off.
i wish he had asked if chris was awake when colin came home
This judge should be disbarred for corruption in favor of these corrupt cops, and prosecution! How pathetic is she!!!!!!!
Chris Albert was such great friends with John, hence Karen too, that he repeatedly calls her DEFENDANT. 🙄
Sniffing, scratching his face constantly, all signs of deception and lying.
🙄 instead of "overruled" she says "I'll let him have this one"
Wow
And she never asks the basis of the objection. She just sustains it. It's crazy.
Chris Albert seemed like he wanted to fight right then and there when they mentioned his son’s name. That family has anger issues!
ARE THE INJURIES CONSISTENT WITH GETTING HIT BY A CAR OR GETTING BEAT UP BUY MEN & SCRATCHED BY A DOG??
Both eyes were blackened. Beat up, knocked out and left in cold. The Albert’s Googled “how long die in cold” at 1:27 am when John was on their lawn. It tells you everything. The scratches were probably from the broken drinking glass.
@@Chris-Aliaor from the Alberts' German shepherd (that they later rehomed).
This woman is chewing gum on the witness stand?!
Prosecutor is not happy that the defense has the audacity of asking questions not related to the weather or the type of drink Karen was having.
She’s innocent!
Why did Albert wife drive over to Fairview for someone missing….suspicious. There must have been a fight with JO and Colin probably and she drove over there to “work it out”
Yup Colin punched him, he fell and hit his head. The uncle didn’t want him to go jail and ruin his life. Called friends and covered it all up
Kinda convenient that the judge calls it a day just when he's getting the witness uncomfortable
Right!
The gum is a nice little touch.
The only thing she may be guilty of is driving under the influence but the cops were drinking and driving also. She referred to John as her husband and she loved him. its okay for her to have a break down at the crime scene. Someone asked if she hit him and she may have repeated with a question mark. (I hit him, I hit him, I hit him???) And as for her stating its all her fault it because she should have went and stayed with him and this would not have happened. She is a model citizen a professor and took care of the kids also.
Has anyone said they personally asked Karen if she hit him? Why would anyone ask that? I think she told on herself.
Why would CA lie about walking out and seeing which way JO'K and KR went? He does testify tho that he didn't think that KR was intoxicated and had no reason to think she was not ok to drive, hmmm
The judge ends the day early, mid-testimony of Mrs Albert? During the part where defense is establishing she was possibly acting as in-between her husband (& his brother) and the lead investigator?
She said earlier in the week today would end at noon.
I’m sure the defense attorney will not forget where he left off and will probably ask the same questions leading up to being blatantly interrupted by the bias judge!
@@pennymoon8113yeah but it kills the momentum and gives the witness a chance to gather her thoughts and answers to “get their story straight”
Most judges would allow the line of questioning to conclude instead of ending immediately at noon in the middle of a pivotal question.
@@pennymoon8113 (No offense, but it's "biasED." 🙂)
The face scratching and rubbing, the sniffing, what a suss witness
Recall chris albert, he is lying!!!!
chris isn't too bright, is he? and the sniffing is annoying
Why are all these people lying about who theyre friends with makes you wonder
She looked at someone befor3 she gave the answer on being informed on Karen's arrest
Mistrial
or guilty.
Wow the judge is awful. Why can’t the Defense ask questions that are about their defense???? 😢😮
I love how the prosecutor has to get the kids ages, profession of witnesses, the layout of the bar, the receipt amount, what they were drinking...do they normally drink this? Riveting!!!! Relevant!!!
Is your memory exhausted 😂😂
"No, just my patience." 😂
now the case is starting to make sense
How?!
The Albert's sons! They clearly had something to do with this, one of them got into a confrontation with Okeefe and Chris Albert and or Brian Albert put a beat down on John Okeefe.
Is the defense implying one of the sons cut through okeefe backyard to get tail light?
@@benspeakman2623 You're being sarcastic? Over a shortcut?
@@mollykillarney2419 they didnt mean to kill him obviously
Wow!! Ive never seen a witness chewing gum??!!
There was a witness the other that had a mint or cough drop and I thought that was bad. Chewing gum is on another level!
I’ve never seen anyone chewing gum whilst giving evidence.
THAT entire Family is covering up the fact in my opinion the nephew of brian he killed john they all witnessed it. they cleaned it up and karen is an eazy target.,
The prosecutor says "sort of", constantly. Very bad habit.