#6 Adam Frank - Technosignatures, Semantic Information, Galactic Colonization

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 22 лис 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 75

  • @keithlowery9708
    @keithlowery9708 Рік тому +7

    Shout out U of R. My mother has worked there for almost 45 years. She speaks very highly of Frank. A conversation between these two was just awesome. Two of the coolest human beings on the planet Earth. Also two of the smartest

  • @aleruri
    @aleruri 4 дні тому

    By far, Cool worlds is the best science and astronomy podcast out there.
    Even for people like me that have formal training in Astrophysics this podcast always captivates my imagination.
    Adam Frank is a wonderful science communicator so listening to these two champions conversation is a nice treat.
    Thanks and please keep them coming 😀

  • @melissanoriega5615
    @melissanoriega5615 Рік тому +14

    I could literally listen to Dr. Kipping and Dr. Frank all day

  • @willcc3
    @willcc3 Місяць тому +1

    Found this podcast recently. I love it! It’s kinda crazy how astrophysicists can teach us about how us overloading ourselves with misinformation can lead to a civilization’s downfall.

    • @willcc3
      @willcc3 Місяць тому

      Thoughts about life and intelligence can be interconnected between organisms is such a great thought. We know that multi-cellular organisms have arisen in conjunction with microorganisms which allow us to extract energy. And we are in symbiosis with these organisms which allow our higher intelligence to arise.

  • @friendlyone2706
    @friendlyone2706 6 місяців тому +4

    Binge watching all the episodes I missed.
    More fun than binging on Star Wars - Your episodes keep getting better.

  • @marisasob
    @marisasob Рік тому +1

    I'm happy i discoverd this Channel. I always enjoy listening to David when i'm in bed falling asleep.

  • @charlescook5542
    @charlescook5542 Місяць тому

    Wow by far the most thought provoking one yet. Lots of ideas coming from the semantic intelligence and agency discussion remind me of this quote "Does the walker choose the path or the path the walker?" At some point we decide what we want but are constrained by our environment so do we really decide what we do? Is it the Newtonian idea where we are responding to stimuli we aren't aware of but we think it's what we are thinking right then? Finally the whole concept of spontaneity and analysis paralysis, life seems to require acting without full understanding of our environment. If we wait for the perfect decision to thrive then that moment will pass and we will miss out. Truly to be alive is to be contradictory.

  • @MzeeMoja1
    @MzeeMoja1 4 місяці тому +1

    I like how you take some time to introduce your guests in an optimally sufficient way without going in too much thus setting the tone quite well. Thank you buddy

  • @toddsawicki
    @toddsawicki Рік тому +5

    This was my favorite CW podcast episode yet (and they are all good) - Dr Frank is was fascinating & his concluding remarks were extremely thought provoking

  • @Marcus-l7q
    @Marcus-l7q 23 дні тому

    It took me a year to finally watch this video. Im happy to have seen this! Great video y'all!!!

  • @dmsoundcollective6746
    @dmsoundcollective6746 Рік тому +7

    What an amazing talk you guys had. I'm driving to work lifting to this and I'm just blown away. Really have to bring them on your channel again man. Thank you so much for sharing this

  • @johnmackay3136
    @johnmackay3136 Рік тому +8

    Excellent, looking forward to this one.
    Always great conversations on this podcast.

  • @bradtravis2440
    @bradtravis2440 Рік тому +6

    What a great guest and converstaion

  • @TonyNaggs
    @TonyNaggs Рік тому +4

    great conversation!
    fyi (~19'00") there's a 280MW concentrated solar power facility, called Solana Generating Station, in Arizona

  • @ladynym89
    @ladynym89 Рік тому

    That conversation was amazing, it blew my mind.

  • @VernAfterReading
    @VernAfterReading Рік тому +4

    Gotta Luv Adam Frank! 1:06:44 "I'm not troubled by the direct Fermi Paradox" because the assumption is "Civilizations end." I mean, I agree, but WOW - the implication is that EVERY Civilization/Species ALWAYS comes to an end, no matter how much technology they gain, no matter how enlightened and careful they are, time still runs out. No that's not troubling at all. 😅

    • @technokicksyourass
      @technokicksyourass Рік тому +2

      Yeah, I'm not really onboard with that one. There really isn't any evidence either way. Empires come to an "end" in some historical sense, but really they just evolve into something else. It's kinda like saying "Dinosaurs came to an end". Well that's true, but birds, that descend from Dinosaurs are still with us. So the semantic category came to an end but the lineage did not.

  • @cnawan
    @cnawan Рік тому +5

    btw, the book about non-conscious aliens referenced by Adam late in the video is "Blindsight" by Peter Watts. I highly recommend it. :)

  • @MichielHollanders
    @MichielHollanders 6 місяців тому

    Absolutely fantastic interview and discussion. Thanks for your great work!

  • @Nomad77ca
    @Nomad77ca Рік тому +1

    Amazing talk! Thank you, very enlightening. It occurred to me when you said "life can't be turned off" that neither can life's information processing. A machine only processes info when told to, and only how it's build or told to process it. Because life is in a constant state of information processing (consciousness??) and physical growth and evolution, there exists many more opportunities for a random interaction between something like 2 neurons connecting in the brain while thinking of one thing which then connects with another idea and bang! a new and novel idea. Life can change and evolve how it processes info, a machine can't (yet).

    • @friendlyone2706
      @friendlyone2706 6 місяців тому

      I'm ready to believe our ancestors were right: There is a Life Force. It uses electromagnetism, chemistry et cetera, but is as much a force in its own right as the warping of space-time we call gravity.
      Who knows? Maybe the life force controls "dark matter."

  • @rhesarozendaal
    @rhesarozendaal Рік тому +3

    Thanks for this wonderful interview!

  • @matcz1320
    @matcz1320 Рік тому +2

    what an interesting and inspiring talk with Prof. Frank. The development of SETI is such a lively science. i would love hearing more from him and his topics.
    thx for producing such nice content

  • @ShaunTottman
    @ShaunTottman Рік тому +1

    I would love to hear more from you both on Techno Signatures. I thoroughly enjoyed the chit chat, especially the question on the origin of information in biological systems. I would recommend Michael Denton's book; 'Evolution: Still a Theory In Crisis' as well as well as Michael Behe's UA-cam series 'Secrets of the Cell'.

  • @mungohalf-brain2743
    @mungohalf-brain2743 6 місяців тому

    Bruno is already the central character in a series of hostorical detective novels.

  • @seagle7297
    @seagle7297 Рік тому +43

    I'm a simple man, I see cool worlds I click

  • @harrymurakami
    @harrymurakami 11 місяців тому

    great conversation, esp the back half

  • @joostonline5146
    @joostonline5146 Рік тому +1

    this guy has unlimited energy

  • @Animatthias
    @Animatthias 2 місяці тому

    I had no idea Shepard from Mass Effect had a podcast! Subscribed!

  • @hellfiresiayan
    @hellfiresiayan Рік тому

    I wish I could listen to this channel without having to be an asmr fan.

  • @suecondon1685
    @suecondon1685 Рік тому

    This is so interesting. By coincidence I watched Bill Nelson (the NASA Administrator) at a public conference last night, where he said NASA would be actively investigating UAP's, (Unexplained Anomalous Phenomena), and he said he believes there absolutely has to be other intelligent life in the unimaginable vastness of the Universe. Fascinating.

  • @ilya_95
    @ilya_95 Рік тому +1

    What's the title of a book that was mentioned at 26:30? Can't find it.
    Fascinating conversation, enjoyed it a lot.

    • @friendlyone2706
      @friendlyone2706 6 місяців тому

      @cnawan
      6 months ago
      btw, the book about non-conscious aliens referenced by Adam late in the video is "Blindsight" by Peter Watts. I highly recommend it. :)

    • @ilya_95
      @ilya_95 6 місяців тому +2

      @@friendlyone2706 Interesting. It would be a pity if humanity were replaced by AI, but it would be a total disaster if that AI was super smart and capable but non-conscious.

  • @stodgepodge
    @stodgepodge 5 місяців тому +1

    I always wonder whether technology itself is a uniquely human thing, like could there be advanced life out there for whom it simply doesn't occur to build the sorts of technologies we're trying to detect?

    • @charlescook5542
      @charlescook5542 Місяць тому +1

      As which was brought up in the discussion life going on on a planet will have unintentional beacons being sent out that say "life is happening here" ie the red light reflection he brought up about photosynthesis. So even if there is something we can't conceive of we can still detect its artificiality by it having signals different from basic physics.

  • @Hubris030
    @Hubris030 4 місяці тому

    1:01:56 with your counter, did you miss his point accidentally or purposely? Genuine question

  • @josemuhr5472
    @josemuhr5472 4 місяці тому

    Any chance to have a link to the paper mentioned at 1:07:34 ?

  • @Baraxes
    @Baraxes Рік тому

    This was epic

  • @adrianyew9785
    @adrianyew9785 Рік тому

    I always believed we are not alone. So difficult or almost impossible to prove.

  • @stephenknox2346
    @stephenknox2346 Рік тому

    More and more research seems to be showing that even for cellls, much of the information storage is occurring outside of DNA.

  • @gregsmitz6310
    @gregsmitz6310 5 місяців тому

    I think techno signatures is way out there. What are the chances?

  • @christopherrseay3148
    @christopherrseay3148 Рік тому +1

    you should get jonathan fortney on here!

  • @javaman4584
    @javaman4584 Рік тому

    Thinking about interstellar colonization, I'm reminded of the ending of "War of the Worlds", where the invading Martians are killed by the earth's biome of microorganisms. If every habitable planet has a biome, then any colonists would be in a constant battle for survival. That could make colonization unattractive or impractical.

    • @friendlyone2706
      @friendlyone2706 6 місяців тому

      But every organism already there is in such a struggle. It would simply up the game.

  • @jh9496
    @jh9496 Рік тому +1

    Honored to have been the 420th like

  • @friendlyone2706
    @friendlyone2706 6 місяців тому +1

    I'm ready to believe our ancestors were right: There is a Life Force. It uses electromagnetism, chemistry et cetera, but is as much a force in its own right as the warping of space-time we call gravity.
    Who knows? Maybe the life force controls "dark matter."

  • @AngryDaddoesDecath5260
    @AngryDaddoesDecath5260 10 місяців тому

    If we were aliens on Alpha Centuri, could we detect earth had a techno signature? Is 4 light years close enough for our buildings and sound waves to travel in 200 years? There seems to be a huge temporal problem with the Ferme Paradox. Things come and go. Change.
    Can we narrow our search for extra-terrestrial life by just looking at stars like our sun in size and age? A hot look for cool worlds.

  • @silentwilly2983
    @silentwilly2983 Рік тому +1

    Interesting talk! I feel however that Adam's holistic view about the world where everything interacts and the earth is a large conscious organism contradicts his skepticism about general AI and his persistence that there is 'no-one home'. If consciousness is an emerging property, how can he rule out AI to become conscious? I guess without a better scientific understanding of consciousness it is more about projection and religion than anything else, but personally I've a very hard time to see how AI technology will not result in a conscious general AI. Maybe you can take a view that if you deprive it from input, or at least freeze the learning process, it just becomes a calculator, but that sounds kind of restrictive to me.

    • @friendlyone2706
      @friendlyone2706 6 місяців тому

      I think Adam's argument gives an explanation for Why humans? Rocks from space have almost wiped out Earth Life. Two conclusions:
      1 There is real estate out there ready for Earth Life colonization.
      2 Something is throwing rocks at us. It is time to fight back before the next rock is too big to survive.
      Both conclusions demand Earth have a technological species ready & willing to escape this planet. Gaia wants, no demands, we become interplanetary and then interstellar.
      Gaia's enemies would then try to plant anti-space travel ideas... Another sci fi book that needs writing. So little time... so many ideas.

  • @Alexanders-Type-I-Civilization

    Maybe we're looking in the wrong direction..
    As scientists and researchers we need to be more opened up to strange and speculative phenomena. Is their duty to not wait for legitimate evidence but to investigate whatever evidence there is.

  • @TeethToothman
    @TeethToothman 11 місяців тому

    ❤❤❤

  • @Alexanderkowaliuk-s7i
    @Alexanderkowaliuk-s7i Місяць тому

    I did misinterpret his theory as a spiritual reality.and i think thats ok. Theres also interesting expirements being done that show plants can effect random number generators in way that if you put a light in the middle of a room and a plant in a corner and connect the number generator to a mechanism that can move the light , after a small period of time the light will end up pointing at the plant more often than anywhere else in the room.😅

  • @ArbitraryConstant
    @ArbitraryConstant Рік тому

    got a little woo woo there imo

    • @friendlyone2706
      @friendlyone2706 6 місяців тому

      As a person who finds most "new age" mysticism at best questionable and at worst harmful, I've reluctantly come to the conclusion the universe holds a great deal of "woo woo", all of which is probably another way of saying, we have not yet developed to language to adequately describe all that we experience.
      Not unlike we still don't have have the symbols essential to describing the controlled plasma release form we call a camp fire. Labeling and understanding ain't the same.

  • @nowsc
    @nowsc Рік тому +1

    …NB: a virus and a Roomba are each made in a factory :-)

    • @DanielVerberne
      @DanielVerberne 5 місяців тому

      We've not made any viruses, as far as I'm aware. Tinkered with extant viruses perhaps.

  • @RoyBurnell-o6n
    @RoyBurnell-o6n 2 місяці тому

    Thomas Gary Lewis Margaret Davis Jason

  • @friendlyone2706
    @friendlyone2706 6 місяців тому

    If life is always trying to survive, then why is life often its own enemy? The rabbit eating fox and the carrot eating rabbit both have very different definitions of survival.
    Artificial systems, simpler is usually more robust than complex. Why shouldn't that be true of life as well? But on this planet, life seems eager to invade all environments and to increase its interdependency --- in other words, to always, in every way, to grow from the simple to the more & more complex.

  • @DankTechUK
    @DankTechUK 5 місяців тому

    Is that a wig?

  • @docastrov9013
    @docastrov9013 Рік тому

    Seems like a grant snaffling snake oil salesman to me.