Why it Doesn't MATTER Legally if Trump Paid Stormy Daniels to Influence Election, with Andy McCarthy

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 29 кві 2024
  • Megyn Kelly is joined by Andy McCarthy of National Review to discuss why it shouldn't matter legally if Trump paid Stormy Daniels in an effort to influence the election, how intent doesn't even matter when it comes to what is a campaign finance violation, the misrepresentation by the prosecution about why Michael Cohen actually went to jail, the judge blocking key details for the jury, and more.
    LIKE & SUBSCRIBE for new videos everyday: bit.ly/3Aw93yw
    Watch full clips of The Megyn Kelly Show here: bit.ly/3xFXNxI
    Sign up for my 'American News Minute' weekly email: www.megynkelly.com
    Tune in live on SiriusXM at 12-2pmET: SiriusXM.us/TheMegynKellyShow
    Find the full audio show wherever you get your podcasts:
    Apple - podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast...
    Spotify - open.spotify.com/show/0awxEJH...
    Follow The Megyn Kelly Show on all social platforms:
    Twitter - / megynkellyshow
    Instagram - / megynkellyshow
    Facebook - / megynkellyshow
    Connect with me on social media:
    Twitter - / megynkelly
    Instagram - / megynkelly
    Facebook - / megynkelly

КОМЕНТАРІ • 210

  • @MegynKelly
    @MegynKelly  16 днів тому +5

    Subscribe to never miss an episode of The Megyn Kelly Show: bit.ly/3Aw93yw

  • @tedhamilton2362
    @tedhamilton2362 16 днів тому +86

    There is no crime. WHY the judge allowed the case to begin with is beyond belief!

    • @ladyd8339
      @ladyd8339 16 днів тому +11

      Come on man! You know why!

    • @kevinchambers1101
      @kevinchambers1101 16 днів тому

      The judges intent is to Jail President Trump. The judge doesn't care if he as a judge is breaking the law. Nothing will stop the corrupt judge from jailing Trump.

    • @vjbhatia77
      @vjbhatia77 16 днів тому

      Because he’s a leftist Democrat, who’s just persecuting, Donald J Trump because he hates him

    • @user-hy1fo5vs4p
      @user-hy1fo5vs4p 16 днів тому +1

      Losers always say the judge is bad. What are the options?

    • @johnnytx45
      @johnnytx45 16 днів тому

      ​@@user-hy1fo5vs4p Biden should be indicted for election interference. Deal with that, Marxist.

  • @jimfesta8981
    @jimfesta8981 16 днів тому +54

    This case should never have survived pretrial motions. Shows you how prejudicial the legal system in New York may be.

  • @oscarpuente2029
    @oscarpuente2029 16 днів тому +44

    No crime was committed!!

  • @DM-sy4hg
    @DM-sy4hg 16 днів тому +50

    The judge blocked the defense from calling FEC experts though. Think about that for a minute. That is a judge trying to determine the outcome on his own.

    • @virginiahunt357
      @virginiahunt357 16 днів тому

      Democrats aim and play to win. Republicans try to follow the law. They may as well become as crooked as the democrats. They are giving the country to bad people.

    • @charlesvan13
      @charlesvan13 15 днів тому

      Trump should violate the judges "gag orders" and continue to post this evidence online. The people have a right to be informed of this crooked case.

  • @mkat740
    @mkat740 16 днів тому +49

    kangaroo court led by dnc judge

  • @TheDreamtimezzz
    @TheDreamtimezzz 16 днів тому +55

    Who oversees this judge and can remove him for obvious corruption?

    • @BM-wh5qk
      @BM-wh5qk 16 днів тому

      His bosses are probably even bigger libtard shills.

    • @czarcastic1458
      @czarcastic1458 16 днів тому +1

      SCJ Sotomayor

    • @luiscastellanos5527
      @luiscastellanos5527 16 днів тому +3

      When it's rather OBVIOUS to us average, normal citizens that there's corruption going on someone needs to have the authority to either put a stop to and say how that can no longer be allowed. Because IF it's being allowed to be done to a person of high status, it can be done ANY lowly citizen. And we as U S. citizen cannot allow that. Because it's justice for all, or justice for none.

    • @PrezVeto
      @PrezVeto 16 днів тому +1

      ​@@ArjayELevin The President has no power over state judges.

    • @PrezVeto
      @PrezVeto 16 днів тому +2

      That would be the chief judge who corruptly assigned the case specifically to Merchan in the first place.

  • @danhardy3704
    @danhardy3704 16 днів тому +14

    If the prosecution isn’t bringing up any criminal allegations which it seems to be happening!! The judge should wake up

  • @stevephillips5768
    @stevephillips5768 16 днів тому +15

    Sounds like the Judge should be on trial for his actions on trying to manipulate a campaign

  • @carrieohio
    @carrieohio 16 днів тому +19

    Hypocrites.

  • @alemswazzu
    @alemswazzu 16 днів тому +6

    Evil. Abusing power like this is evil. It's so clear. Sick people.

  • @DMT-ix9zj
    @DMT-ix9zj 16 днів тому +10

    You called it earlier the fix is in . My uncle is an attorney he said like Andy this is all BS and the judge should've tossed the case during all the brief's filed at start of trial.

    • @user-hy1fo5vs4p
      @user-hy1fo5vs4p 16 днів тому

      Has your uncle ever successfully told any judge what to do, really? It's like telling a doctor what to do. Give up!

    • @comment8767
      @comment8767 16 днів тому

      @@user-hy1fo5vs4p dumb comment award

  • @dannyvillasenor9959
    @dannyvillasenor9959 16 днів тому +6

    It certainly does have a feeling that the judge has hit foot on the scales of justice. I was under the impression that the defense has every right to bring it's own experts to testify. It is apparently the judicial system in NY has its own set or laws or rules.

  • @josephm3775
    @josephm3775 16 днів тому +14

    Ha! "It doesn't matter what's inside David PeckersHead" Way to go Megyn!

    • @JeffCelentano
      @JeffCelentano 16 днів тому +6

      D'oh! You beat me to the punch on that one. I totally thought the exact same thing...lol

    • @DalilahR
      @DalilahR 16 днів тому +2

      It also doesn't matter what is in Zion Don's head. It's what he has done, is doing, & will continue to do that matters, such as supporting what Israel is doing.

    • @JaimeTaylor-lf1dd
      @JaimeTaylor-lf1dd 15 днів тому

      He truly is a peckerhead

  • @KapyBarra41
    @KapyBarra41 16 днів тому +8

    It's going to be satisfying watching higher courts or the Supreme Court wipe their asses with these ridiculous cases

  • @saintcruzin
    @saintcruzin 16 днів тому +3

    They are making a mockery of our laws…

  • @charlesvan13
    @charlesvan13 15 днів тому +2

    "How was he able to prosecute John Edwards under the same statute."
    That was an unsuccessful prosecution. It resulted in on conviction.
    How can you use a failed prosecution as an example of a proper use of a statute?

  • @LivingtheDream67
    @LivingtheDream67 16 днів тому +4

    Its true,it doesnt matter what was in in anyones head. This is just a bunch of Malarkey.

  • @timstahl1011
    @timstahl1011 16 днів тому +3

    Eventually the prosecutor will have to produce evidence of a crime to the jury.

  • @jpvoodoo5522
    @jpvoodoo5522 16 днів тому +4

    That's too much reading for the average juror. They are going to go on the assumption that its bribery and someone wanting to hide something feels like it is illegal.

  • @user-cz8cz5uw9m
    @user-cz8cz5uw9m 16 днів тому +10

    How does blackmailing ppl becoming legal im glad he won ❤

    • @nancygawlowicz2562
      @nancygawlowicz2562 16 днів тому

      Still the assumption that it's damaging information. Daniels said and wrote many times that nothing happened between her and Trump. People can threaten to tell lies and be paid off to not tell those lies. It happens all the time to men who have money, power or position. They're constantly vulnerable to protect their name if they have resources that an accuser can hope to extract from them.

    • @SomeUser421
      @SomeUser421 15 днів тому

      lol, basic facts. She didn't contact Trump to extort him, she contacted a "news organization" to sell her story! People do it all the time! Stormy had nothing to do with the fact that the Enquirer has ZERO integrity and instead of running a story (that would have been front page for 3 months if it was a Biden), they contacted Trump, so they could OFFER to buy her silence.

  • @anthonygordon2976
    @anthonygordon2976 15 днів тому +3

    So the judge is the criminal in the court room

  • @Rekles
    @Rekles 16 днів тому +6

    Isn’t that extortion when the enquirer does that

  • @chucksherry
    @chucksherry 16 днів тому +1

    I wish Andy McCarthy would appear on camera like he does on other guest appearances. Every time Andy's on Megyn Kelly, he's never on camera. Why? Great show as usual. 😊

  • @aaronchustz8531
    @aaronchustz8531 16 днів тому +6

    They already went too far. They only have one more move. Hmmm?

  • @truckdriver8416
    @truckdriver8416 16 днів тому +6

    It's quite obvious with the plan is🎉 get a conviction on Trump at all costs🎉 the appeal and overturning of the case will happen long after the election is over🎉

  • @greenhornet5186
    @greenhornet5186 16 днів тому +3

    This entire case is a total scam. I am concerned that the jury pool is poisoned.

  • @user-kq2mn3rg8w
    @user-kq2mn3rg8w 16 днів тому +8

    Hopefully Trumps attorneys are telling the jury that there’s No Crime!!!!

    • @sappyjohnson
      @sappyjohnson 16 днів тому +4

      They are not allowed to say that. Judge won't permit it

    • @mountaindew3201
      @mountaindew3201 12 днів тому

      @@sappyjohnsonhow do u know?

    • @sappyjohnson
      @sappyjohnson 12 днів тому

      @@mountaindew3201 The judge ruled that the former FEC commissioner could not testify that this is not a crime.

    • @mountaindew3201
      @mountaindew3201 11 днів тому +1

      @@sappyjohnson can’t they show legal evidence and legal law book stating it’s not a crime?

    • @sappyjohnson
      @sappyjohnson 10 днів тому

      @@mountaindew3201 We will see, but it's my understanding that the judge is not allowing that.

  • @kennedybj1
    @kennedybj1 16 днів тому +2

    we are beating a dead horse here this judge isn't gonna let anyone come between him and his jury..he is screwed and will just have to appeal

  • @garywilliams1779
    @garywilliams1779 16 днів тому +3

    LOOK AT BILLY CLINTON WHAT HE DONE.

  • @davistafulaninsimba8697
    @davistafulaninsimba8697 15 днів тому +1

    This no longer a justice department! Very corrupted case! All of these people involved in the scam should be held accountable.

  • @beckamarie2438
    @beckamarie2438 16 днів тому +6

    Isn't this a he said/she said trial? No proof/waste of time!

    • @GenXgirl969
      @GenXgirl969 16 днів тому

      No not at all--It’s a sham trial. There is no crime. It has nothing to do w/ “he said she said.”
      It’s about the NDA expenditure whether or not it’s a campaign finance violation, not Trumps’s intentions w/ Stormy Daniel’s.

  • @johncampbell8072
    @johncampbell8072 15 днів тому +1

    I wish all conservative voices were speaking as clearly as you Megan. This trial is an atrocity. If the people of New York are for this, there is no hope for this country.

  • @gman3451
    @gman3451 16 днів тому +3

    Sounds like Daniel’s is guilty of extortion! 🤬

  • @sappyjohnson
    @sappyjohnson 16 днів тому +2

    We no longer live in America

    • @virginiahunt357
      @virginiahunt357 16 днів тому

      Fundamentally transformed. By Obama and Biden

  • @ms56355
    @ms56355 16 днів тому +2

    Its all Liberal desperation

  • @MrOldclunker
    @MrOldclunker 14 днів тому +1

    Correct!

  • @lorrainecaporaletti226
    @lorrainecaporaletti226 16 днів тому +2

    These women are very sad women who had no self worth. Sad

  • @michaelreed9805
    @michaelreed9805 16 днів тому +5

    It should be a blackmail trial! Not a hush money trial! Its backwards

  • @RobertSmith-lw2bx
    @RobertSmith-lw2bx 16 днів тому +1

    He used his own money not campaign funds. This is a crap book keeping charge. (I’m not a lawyer but I stayed at a Holiday Inn.)

  • @marydiggins9294
    @marydiggins9294 16 днів тому +1

    Megyn Kelly, you look good in every color - not fair.

  • @user-fq9fg3hh2o
    @user-fq9fg3hh2o 16 днів тому +1

    Why he pay !!!!

  • @norman7179
    @norman7179 16 днів тому +1

    I'm still trying to collect my tax return from 2022.
    It's not under audit and not contested.

  • @williamwhitten7820
    @williamwhitten7820 16 днів тому +1

    *Alito asked Justice Department attorney Michael Dreeben if a former president should be left to the mercy of prosecutors, noting an old saying on the pliability of grand juries: That grand jurors would indict a ham sandwich if a prosecutor asked them to.*

  • @PrezVeto
    @PrezVeto 16 днів тому +1

    Never think judicial appointments aren't important. Remember this the next time Lindsey Graham rubber stamps whomever a Dem President nominates to the Supreme Court.

  • @katherinemossor8575
    @katherinemossor8575 16 днів тому +1

    Will this go to the supreme court or an appellate court and be overturned

  • @kfhtkfht
    @kfhtkfht 8 днів тому

    ‏America's impudence is evident in this trial 😷

  • @docvader2926
    @docvader2926 14 днів тому +3

    Democrat "judge" democrat "prosecutor" democrat "jury" democrat "city" democrat "state" democrat "county"
    I'm sure none of this is political 🤣🤣🤣🤣

  • @RoYaL3796
    @RoYaL3796 9 днів тому

    Just because everyone does it doesn't make it right Megyn.

  • @bigpapio9271
    @bigpapio9271 14 днів тому +1

    Why is DJT getting indicted for being blackmailed?

  • @raiders753334
    @raiders753334 16 днів тому +1

    Big shock....Dave being wrong about something to do with trump

  • @padraiggluck2980
    @padraiggluck2980 16 днів тому +1

    Zackly!

  • @nn-db6yy
    @nn-db6yy 16 днів тому +1

    Always the victim

  • @monalaurent8905
    @monalaurent8905 16 днів тому +1

    She took the money. Both are consensual adults. Why is she not on trial too. They make it seem like she is a saint.

  • @kenmclemore523
    @kenmclemore523 16 днів тому +1

    1. Love the Hillary Clinton analogy because one could argue The Steele Dossier was a campaign expense... 2. Paying off potential blackmail isn't your ordinary campaign expense... at least under the law... KDM

  • @Juliemarg
    @Juliemarg 16 днів тому +1

    As far as I know, most campaign finance penalties are for candidates using their campaign money for personal expense. Client buys $2000 suit with campaign money = illegal. They're saying client buys $2000 suit with his own money but he should have used campaign money.

    • @virginiahunt357
      @virginiahunt357 16 днів тому

      Family said on the witness stand , that she used her campaign money for her personal life.

  • @gwshelton4875
    @gwshelton4875 16 днів тому +1

    Megyn knows all about PAYOFFS , Remember? 😂😂

  • @debbiesicard7027
    @debbiesicard7027 14 днів тому +1

    Stromy needs more money for Sergey. Stromy is getting old. Patch up time.

  • @katherineharvey5663
    @katherineharvey5663 16 днів тому +2

    Meghan go watch the interview with piers morgan and Stormy Daniels interview

  • @user-bs1xw6lc3i
    @user-bs1xw6lc3i 16 днів тому +2

    Megyn Kelly you mentioned others who've done the same thing. In the words of the late MLK just because everyone else is doing it doesn't mean it's right.

    • @djhergert1995
      @djhergert1995 16 днів тому

      There's a difference between something being morally objectionable and criminal. It's not criminal to pay hush money or pay for good coverage.
      The fact others have done this for years but Trump is the only one to be indicted for the non crime proves Trumps point that its a Witch hunt.

  • @commonsense246
    @commonsense246 10 днів тому

    But extortion IS a crime so why isn't she being indicted????????

  • @tulionunez9964
    @tulionunez9964 16 днів тому +1

    it doesn't matter, whatever he wants to do or says it's ok, he's the second coming of Jesus, Amen.

  • @Rexodus014
    @Rexodus014 16 днів тому +2

    ............................................................................ Megyn . . . YOU owe GOVERNOR Kristi Noem a HUGE APOLOGY !

  • @wesmcmasters1694
    @wesmcmasters1694 14 днів тому

    🏴‍☠️

  • @pathacker4963
    @pathacker4963 16 днів тому +1

    John Edwards was before the Citizens United ruling wasn’t it?
    Didn’t campaign finance laws change after that.

  • @user-pk7ur3ev6d
    @user-pk7ur3ev6d 16 днів тому +2

    Just figuring that out now Barbie?

  • @user-hy1fo5vs4p
    @user-hy1fo5vs4p 16 днів тому +2

    Megyn has no agenda? Does she know the meaning of the word?

  • @MarcusAurelius7777
    @MarcusAurelius7777 16 днів тому +3

    Guy never changes his expression - weird 😶

  • @bertharvey3137
    @bertharvey3137 12 днів тому

    ok megyn i am a fan but i can no longer remain silent when you state david pekkers head it is just too middle school funny not to address. hahaha

  • @cafl9844
    @cafl9844 16 днів тому +2

    Oh Megyn darling, I am afraid it does legally matter !

    • @vjbhatia77
      @vjbhatia77 16 днів тому

      You’re a leftist airhead!

  • @jaysonj9327
    @jaysonj9327 16 днів тому +1

    You realize however that this all could have been made moot if DeSantis had gotten the primary nod? The even further brutal irony being that DeSantis regardless of him being squeaky clean is the better general election candidate? Anyone? Anyone home? Bueller?

  • @gman3451
    @gman3451 16 днів тому +1

    She said Pecker’s head 😂 I had a Beavis moment 🙂

  • @netterstyl
    @netterstyl 16 днів тому +1

    She said "pecker." Uh, please remember that this is a family show.

  • @bahmo100
    @bahmo100 15 днів тому +1

    Hussein Obama is having a big laugh

  • @joeswanson401
    @joeswanson401 16 днів тому +1

    It amazes me that Trump has a multimillion-dollar legal team and people don't think he isn't triple-checking to make sure what he's doing is legal 😂

  • @user-nm5xb7ob2p
    @user-nm5xb7ob2p 16 днів тому +1

    it's keeping your show going and your long list of talking heads

  • @adamcarrigan5099
    @adamcarrigan5099 16 днів тому

    Trump would be glad your not his lawyer. You're not the sharpest tool in the shed

  • @greorbowlfinder7078
    @greorbowlfinder7078 16 днів тому +1

    Wrong. What if an E-4 with access to nukes had an affair, paid a porn star to keep it quiet and then lied about it? Would we still let him around the nukes?!

    • @kewan2443
      @kewan2443 16 днів тому

      Nobody would give a damn if a corporal or specialist was sleeping with a pornstar like a lot of people don't care about Teflon Don sleeping with one.

    • @djhergert1995
      @djhergert1995 16 днів тому

      What? The guy in your ridiculous "What if" would probably lose his job because he is at risk of being blackmailed. It wouldn't make it criminal though.
      None of what theyre accusing Trump of is illegal. Maybe the bookkeeping is but Trump didn't even write those notations in the ledger and what is he supposed to put there "Hush money payment to porn star"? Kind of defeats the point of an NDA when you go and break it by writing in a ledger.
      According to you guys it's now illegal for any Politician to not tell the world about every potential negative thing they did before they run for office.

  • @stevenbennion1544
    @stevenbennion1544 16 днів тому

    He paid for her service and she delivered in full satisfaction not once but thrice, now he's saying it's a giant which hunt 😂😂😂.. Imagine Melania going thru those scenes, again.

    • @Ebstarrunner
      @Ebstarrunner 16 днів тому

      That must be why Stormy put it in writing that nothing ever happened 🤣🤣🤣🤣
      EDIT: Imagine Hillary though! Bill had to have a dedicated team to shutting up the women that were accusing him. Paid them off. Made them all sign NDA's. Tons of hush money. I guess he conspired to steal the election. Hillary used campaign money to drum up a fake document about Trump being "Russian Agent".. She also conspired to steal an election... Oh... Wait.. I guess all that is just (D)ifferent

    • @GenXgirl969
      @GenXgirl969 16 днів тому +3

      What? No that’s not at all what this sham trial is about.

    • @marydiggins9294
      @marydiggins9294 16 днів тому +2

      You have totally missed the point.

    • @stevenbennion1544
      @stevenbennion1544 16 днів тому

      @@marydiggins9294 I said what he wanted..the payment is the issue.. Get it

    • @marydiggins9294
      @marydiggins9294 16 днів тому

      @@stevenbennion1544Trump did nothing illegal.

  • @theflixcapacitor1372
    @theflixcapacitor1372 16 днів тому +1

    There is no proof that crime is illegal! - MAGA 😂

  • @randallbraddock549
    @randallbraddock549 16 днів тому

    Kelly spews negativity, divisiveness, biased views

    • @montague566
      @montague566 16 днів тому +3

      Does the pot call the kettle black much ?

    • @johnliggitt3002
      @johnliggitt3002 16 днів тому +5

      You must have libgoggles

    • @kevinchambers1101
      @kevinchambers1101 16 днів тому +4

      She is bringing up legitimate questions and arguments that most of us want to hear.

  • @user-ju6qt6cc5t
    @user-ju6qt6cc5t 12 днів тому +1

    Were is the crime?
    It’s a sham

  • @jacquelinejeffs4079
    @jacquelinejeffs4079 16 днів тому

    Because it doesn’t go for their narrative, that’s why he won’t let him testify because the truth will come out

  • @garyg7684
    @garyg7684 10 днів тому

    why dont you go away who cares what you think