Full Wash: 2022 Speed Queen TR7003WN Load of Towels
Вставка
- Опубліковано 28 сер 2024
- Recently got a 2022 model of the INFAMOUS Speed Queen TR Washer in our shop. This is the first full wash we did with it on some VERY dirty shop towels.
Try my favorite detergents:
Buy Tide Pods: amzn.to/37j9nar
Buy Ariel Powder: amzn.to/3HZSxtP
Buy Tide Powder: amzn.to/3hTNlwZ
Support Me on Patreon: / lorainfurniture
Buy a Tee Shirt: lorainfurnitur...
Get a Appliance Screwdriver: lorainfurnitur...
Shop towels require Max dirt setting, Pre-wash, and a fairly long soak cycle. Especially true for dark greasy shop towels or mud-infused jeans as I have at home. Some of those towels are suitable for a trash can. In short, the lack of following a basic procedure for to clean this mess short-changed the Speed Queen; it is amazing it still did great.
I have this washer and it took me awhile to figure out which settings worked best for me. However, once I learned, I have truly enjoyed this washer. I either pre-soak or pre-treat any stains that will be a nusance. Other than that, the TR7 is a fantastic washer. I am extremely satisfied with it.
@anthonygarza901: Always use the auto fill for best results too. Use top quality detergents and not budget brands. Check out Consumer Reports September issue on the ratings of many detergents pods, liquids, and sheets.
It should be. You paid enough for it I assume.
@@patcola7335 Agree 100%!
@@patcola7335for what I paid for my speed queen in the last four years I had to replace 3 washers because it cost more to fix then replace, I had a kenmore, Maytag and lg all were top of the line commercial washers. So I went back to the type of washer we had in our house growing up that lasted 25 years. Just saying.
Stubborn stains need pretreatment in most cases, regardless of what washer one uses anyway. I use an old-school SQ that still does warm rinses, which I like very much, and it has electromechanical dials. I will keep this machine for as long as it can be repaired. However, I do very much like the programming and options on the TR7
Well. I have this model. I had the earlier 2010 model. I sold it because it beat my clothes to death. Nothing lasted more than a year. With this new model, it cleans without doing damage and relies on what I think is a "smart wash". With this approach, if you have ground in dirt or grease, you pick a normal cycle but add the additional soak option and you get great results without destroying your clothes. Also, always use the auto level button, it is the best in the business and never fails.
I'd stick with heavy duty cycles.
What kind of clothes do you buy that they don't last a year? I have T-shirts from 7 years ago that I still wear and they have only been washed in agitator washers and not a hole in any of them nor are they threadbare.
Sure. Worn about three times I would guess. Nice try. @@patcola7335
Then you washed them on the gentle cycle only. I am not an idiot. @@patcola7335
I call BS on that claim.
I'm from Brazil, and always find funny that people in US thinks that a 45 minute cycles is a long cycle.
Here in Brazil, the average time for the normal cycle is about 1:30h and for heavy-duty it's about 2:40h ( some models this cycle gets even more longer )
So 65 minutes for the heavy-duty isn't that longer.
People in the US must be sitting and watching every wash cycle instead of letting the washer do it's thing and spending their time doing other things.
Oh my , a long cycle will tatter your clothing fibers?
@@angiedavisson3243 not with front loaders. They’re very delicate on clothing especially compared to top loaders.
@@latui7350Agreed. I've only sewn one button on in the 25 years I've had a front loader.
@latui7350 My commercial grade front loader Speed Queen only takes 57 minutes for a heavy-duty cycle with an extra rinse.
There is definitely turn over happening. It’s the opposite to what one would usually observe in a regular agitator washer. Clothes move away from the agitator instead of towards it. I still think that SQ engineers could redesign the tub/agitator to create more turbulence/movement.
You're absolutely right. In this new design it works similar to the HE Top loaders with the was plate. The load moves towards the sides of the tub and resurfaces in the middle of the wash action. I guess the fuss is the fact that no one is accustomed to seeing a top loading machine with an agitator doing this.
BTW, with this amount of dirty, I would have used the soak/prewash settings first and then run it using the heavy setting with extra rinse.
I wanna see this same load of super nasty towels in the TC series with the good agitator
This is a good machine. People that say it isn't haven't used it, but it is different than the TC. In the real world, this load should have soaked, pre-washed, and max soil with hot water. That's over an hour wash for sure, so I get the point of shortening this for video purposes, but that's what I would have done. I had to return the TC because of standpipe foam with a thimble of soap, so I make the best of the TR.
I like vintage Maytags from the 1980s
What I would give to get mine back. My daughter ruined it by putting outdoor Clorox in it.
@@barbaramazzocca4605 probably run it through a cycle
Had a heart attack moving one of those by myself. No plastic tub or basket in those...
Don’t we all?
Okay for this machine, you gotta use the autofill feature for it to clean right on most items.
I have this washer. Got it this summer in 2023. I think it’s a big mistake to override autofill unless your load is literally up to the top of the silver drum. It impacts washing ability as it bases fill level on friction it detects. It needs the right water level to wash the best in these
@Matt-fu5ty: I found that out with my 2018 SPEED QUEEN TR5 SERIES WASHER. I think auto-fill should always be selected for the best washing results in these machines.
@@albertcarello619or it could just have a good agitator like the regular transmitter speed queen and there would never be a need to bitch about water level being an excuse.
@@Brownie-tg3nu Yep!
1:56 ... Did I hear correctly that they didn't use any soap in this load? I wonder what kind of a difference it would have made in the overall cleanliness of the load at the end if they had used detergent (like happens 99.99999% of the time in real life)?
YES thank you. I have the same thought.
I mean, go for a week or ten days without washing your hair.
THEN, try to wash away all that oily residue without any shampoo or soap.
What happens?
Hair stays oily, that's what happens.
I Owned one of these for a year and a half and ever since a week after we got it I discovered it didn't clean anything dirty/dusty. A year later it started squeaking loudly, erroring out, and nonstop going unbalanced like crazy. After a while the machine died completely and would finish a wash without throwing out "ED-31" error which I think is a major issue code, so it was condemned. not surprised it was on the junk bin lol, wonder why someone would throw out the dryer! They must have a lot of money lol
I know that the first run had problems because the electrical harness was short and moved when the tub assembly moved drastically which sometimes caused further electronic failures in quite a few examples of the first iteration due to shorts, bad signals and arching.
@@LlyleHunter
thanks! Yep I think that was the problem, I noticed that the wires were secured to the tub rather than the cabinet, so possibly after long term they'd rub off the coating and short out? It did seem the wires were quite tight especially if you picture the tub banging around.
I have the front loader. Works great and very fast
@@Joemil271 how long have you had the front loader and how well does it clean?
@@Edsresearch I’ve had it about 7 years and it’s used practically every day. It cleans very well and it is very fast. My last front loader was a whirlpool: hated it. Sounded like a freight train and took way too long
How did you keep it open during the wash? Mine has a lid lock. How did you disable this feature?
I feel if they made a ribbed tub for this model it'd greatly improve performance. For this load i would've used Autofill cuz The clothes look like they were mostly floating on top
This machines wash style reminds me of the old GE HydroWaves
Digital panels and computers allow them to increase cycle times. It doesn't mean it's necessary for most loads of clothes. You Should have done a prewash on those rags so it drains the dirty water out from the initial wash then a normal cycle after.
The center post should be a spiral cork screw type so it only has to go in one direction. Clothes in the drum will rotate from top to bottom over and over.
That is the tc7. You pick how your swirl
I totally get what you're saying. Having a spiral at the top of the agitator would stop the items from staying on top for so long!
When I wash items that are this dirty I do a very short wash. Then I do my regular wash as if I had not done the previous wash. Always comes out clean. You can't expect something to come clean when you're watching in dirty water.
If the washer was actually a good performer, it would actually beat the dirt out of clothes whether there was dirty or not. That’s what the rinses are for, to get rid of that dirty water and soap from the clothes
@@Ikey04-ge9gy did we watch the same video? how did the towels not come out clean???
@lespaulranger coulda been cleaner
@@Ikey04-ge9gy they were pretty clean; this is something that requires at least an additional rinse, did you see how dirty the wash water was?
@lespaulranger a front load washer can definitely outclean it on its default normal cycle
The water actually got dirty! Still did not clean well tho, and the towels went up the agitator and down the tub
The towels went up the agitator and down the tub, the way the washer was designed to wash. Nothing weird about that.
Don't want my clothes taken for a ride i want them cleaned!😄
...also, did anyone notice the infinite and dynamic speed change she used to keep the load in balance and still spin it out? Watch closely if you did not, it is very polished and I have never over a year had an unbalanced spin. The old design could not, it was and still is a two-speed-only machine.
I truly miss my top loaders from thirty years ago. You don't have to close the lid until it's ready to spin. I want my lit open while it's filling, for sure. I wash my machine inside and out while it's filling using the water that's coming in. Now, I can not do that
Same here. I have the Lady Kenmore with its beautiful porcelain enamel interior drum and porcelain enamel exterior as well.
I have one of these since 2019.. the 2019+ are much better than the original 2018.. mine was buoilt in feb 2019 and wash action is identical to yours here as are the cycle times... I only ever use heaby duty.. and after a lot of experimentation I actually use Auto for the water unless im doing sheets and bedspreads.. ive found that just filling it doesnt give you the best wash action.. you dont want the load to complwetely float like it did here.. you want it to be semi close to each other.. my machine does a much ,ore respectable job after ive learned to use heavy duty and auto fill for most cycles.. a load as dirty as yours really you should call for an extra rinse.. run that test again on auto fill and watch it.. while ive always been a fan of traditional machines i actually am liking this machine.. but there are some clothes that I believe you just need to beat to death with an agitator like the TC5 does...
I have a feeling you probably would use the extended cycle sooner or later to get those shop towels completely clean
It should have a "filthy" cycle...😃
How did this washer make it through the testing department? I mean, who looked at this and thought it was a good idea? Let's make a washer that doesn't wash or clean and charge the consumer's over a grand to buy it. What a P.O.S.😂
I know they even have videos of the so called "engineers" explaining their thoughts but none of it makes sense... to appease the government regulations or something they could have shortened up the wash to 4 minutes on normal eco for the old models, and limit the fill down on normal eco. Bam, problem solved.
@@DylBuilder1 exactly. 👍
@DylBuilder1 there are plenty of other washers that do way better with the current regulations in place. They keep trying this damned agi-tub design and its worthless
I would like to see the Work pants test on heavy duty full 68 minutes, Auto Fill. If the result is the same then the 2022 iteration is not better.
Thank you Eugene for bringing us a follow up. They’ve eliminated some of the longer rotations from the previous iterations because they wasted hydrodynamic energy but it’s clear that more work and attention needs to be focused on this series of machines. I’ve tried reaching Allied with my ideas regarding a new design for the center post non agitator and how I think it could facilitate a greater blooming effect with every movement but the company seems unreachable and completely unresponsive. They’re far more interested in their laundry concentrated businesses.
Correction: laundromat concentrated businesses
...or they likely considered it and discarded the idea as this is not a "bloom" action design, on purpose. It is far superior.
@@arthurtennessen9680Yeah. Frigidaire tried the same thing about a decade ago and it was a bust.
@@patcola7335Frigidaire hasn’t gotten anything right in over 3 decades when it comes to washer’s.
We just bought the TR 7 washer. My mother's complaint is that it's too small, can't do large items.
I’ve been watching your helpful videos since I need to buy a new washer/dryer set. Curious to know what you trust at home to really clean your laundry. I’m more confused than when I started as far as which machine to choose. Just need really practical advice and I trust your opinion. Thanks
what you ednded up purchasing ?
I guess this TR7 is letting people know that she ain't playing with her "extended" cycle minutes. 68 minutes on Heavy Duty? Damn! If I ever had me a TR7 I'm gonna put that washer to work.
@@DylBuilder1 How in what way they suck? How did your washer gave out? Why do you feel I shouldn't consider buying one? Your opinion is just one of a thousand. Everyone's perspective on Speed Queen washers are different. Just because you have a distrust of them doesn't mean others should follow suit.
@@erg844 I understand bro I was just giving my two cents. Just trying to save your $1400..
Mine gave out in the electronics. The first problem it had was weak suspension, first it would squeak, eventually it couldn't balance a large load so I had to wash smaller loads. Then the machine started having lid lock problems. They replaced both the lock and the switch and it worked fine for a few days until it started spitting out weird errors and wouldn't finish. they replaced the computer board twice down below and once up above by the user interface. 1 week later it shut down, locked up and said "ED-31" and that was the end of it.
@@DylBuilder1 $1400.00? That amount of money is the kind of money people pay their rent with for a studio apartment in NY! I love Speed Queen dearly but these prices are ridiculous and my goodness who fixed your washer to cause it to break down like that?
@@erg844 Yeah the prices are crazy, Peter got a good deal scratch and dent. I think it was more the machine since it was repaired maybe twice a month, but it was a place called Fred's appliance which despite the local sounding name has a chain across 4 states in the northwest corner up here..
@@DylBuilder1 As I think about it clearly I would rather buy a Whirlpool commercial instead.
I must say I’ve had many machines in my past, but this is by far the most versatile machine of any currently made. The user could select temperature, soil, level, water level, and everything in between.
Could you please do the new GE combo All in one. Thanks.
Yes please!
Whats that strange sound downstairs Grandma ? Just the washing machine wasting alot of time pausing and doing much of nothing.
How did you take off the lid lock. I have this same model. But it was made in 2023 cannot find anything in the manual
I'm not gonna tell you for your safety - if you can't figure it out, you def shouldn't be fukin wit it lol 😂
I mean, it looks like they may have worked out a bug or two and did a respectable job but the wash action is still on the anemic side. It may be gentler on some items, but certainly won’t get heavily soiled items like jeans cleaned, they will be a bit cleaner but not cleaned 100%.
Umm 🤔. I think I’m staying with my 2016 speed queen.
I know, right?
Please do
Yes stay with yours. You have the model with a actual transmission. Simple long lasting and better washing action.
Amen! Me too
watching the same towel sit on top and not move makes me crazy. There has to be a better way to make a traditional machine that cleans well and has rollover.
This washer is so boring and too soft and delicate...so boring and depressing. Would much rather see an old Whirpool direct drive go to work
I agree something that's has a hum noise to it but I think the direct drives are better than the newer speed queen
Yep 100% J U N K I owned one it was a huge letdown
@@DylBuilder1 1000 percent agree
@@DylBuilder1Unfortunately you got a lemon. Please don't say no other manufacturers have a defective unit slip by. The repair person should have fix the problem.
@@johnalbanese30 Explain how I got two lemons in a row then. Because I can't other than saying this company has horrible quality control LOL
Such a control console. What's that washer doing launching into orbit.
I would not blame either powder or machine for the result on that dirty wash. The machine did well in my opinion. We just have to use a prewash and a spin on the worst jobs, and maybe sort the worst out for a separate turn in the machine? In some tests powders with percarbonate and oxy clean have done better than most other detergents by far, but that is in warm to hot water and longer cycles. In cold water washes other types do a better job. With an hour of soaking and a some agitation now and then, the powders with percarbonate removed even old and stubborn staining. Real life loads of dirty laundry are different than most tests done on both machines and detergents.
Funny how everyday tasks and challenges like these come to our attention, over and over ;- )
I think tc series is top of the line
Eugene, when you’re washing something filthy like that, to get the best cleaning would be to put 5 pounds of detergent in there, no matter what machine you use to wash your shop towels you should use an old wringer washer turn it on in the morning and turn it off at 4 o’clock and see if they’re clean?
Speed Queen is horrible. We fought with Speed Queen for two months to pick up their terrible product. Finally agreed on a $600 haircut. So much for trying to support an American company. Notice where this guy said he acquired these, off of a garbage truck.
Yup. I noticed that. What about a front loader?
@@Edsresearch I would avoid Speed Queen and go with LG and just plan on replacing them every 5 years.
@@joshuafrantz217 What? That seems like such a waste. And sadly how appliances are going these days.Every one raves about them?
@@edwina3358 everyone “raves” about which brand? I am raving mad 😡 about speed queen. Speed Queen is horrible for modern fabrics of today. SQ might be ok if you wear only denim and don’t care about wrinkles.
@@joshuafrantz217 Yes, SQ. I am so sorry. Especially because you value buying American made.. Which model did you have? Sounds like it was a nightmare? I ware denim on occasion. Mostly gym. Dress clothing. Tshirts.
This is the water wave wash technology. With how delicate everyone's clothes are these days, most people don't want true agitator machines.... thwy have to make what will sell. At the end of the day Speed Queen found a way to give the people a washer that works the way they want it to while still keeping the good ol' Speed Queen quality, while every other manufacturer seems to have given up on quality.
I’d like to find the people who tossed this set and see if they will pay my mortgage and car payment for me since they have $2k to throw away 😂
I know lol
More like 3K man.
@@Brownie-tg3nu Oh good, they can pay my HOA fee too :)
They threw it out because it is frustratingly bad. Pathetic.
@@erossinema8797 speed queen needs to come out and say this washer was a mistake, stop manufacturing it and telling people that it doesn’t work well because they don’t know how to use it. Telling customers that they don’t know how to use a washing machine is insulting. They need to focus their attention on, their regular speed, queen, and make a low, middle, and high end of the classic speed, queen like they used to.
I would rather have the TC model with the transmission.
they say rollove ris what ya need for cleaning to work
Please do this with the GE Profile Ultrafast Combo!
Settings:
Heavy Duty
Extra Fill
Extra Rinse
Spin: one level below Max (recommended)
Wrinkle Care
I have the same exact washing machine. I think it's a great machine!!!
Why is there very little to no roll-over? It just spins the load back and forth. They should of put in a auger type agitator.
You easily needed Tide Pods!The water looks like coffee! I'd say at least 3 Tide Pods!
He needs to wash this over in his own Speed Queen front loader or his LG front loader and those would finish it off right. It would be a great follow up video too.
4 pods more like and several rinses
@@tennillej9601 I agree!!!!
@@albertcarello619 You've also reminded me I need to buy some more so thank you genuinely
@@tennillej9601 YOU'RE WELCOME!
Hey Eugene. I thought you didn't like the Speed Queen perfect wash series.
He's probably just reviewing it
@@Thedonsmoney25823 I would've used the heavy duty cycle with max soil level.
@@jeromedavis8575 I wonder what would the heavy duty cycle look like, fast agitation or the same
@@Thedonsmoney25823 Maybe Speed Queen should've added soft brushes into the agitator for dirt and stain removal scrubbing effect and water recirculation.
How is speed queen still selling the TR series… you would’ve thought they’d have learned after the whole extravaganza in 2018
They are selling them because they are excellent machines.
They should've learned but they didn't the only thing keeping them in the residential market is the Front loader and maybe TC5. They don't care because mechanically the TR series is much cheaper to make because there's no transmission.
Almost all of SQ's revenue comes from leasing or selling commercial machines to laundromats, hotels, spas ETC. So really that's the market they put the most energy and money into.
@@petermaz701🤣🤣🤣 The TR washer sucks man. They are built well, but they clean like shit. I cannot believe that they still make this machine. I have been an appliance tech for 23 years and I have never seen people this unhappy with a washing machine. And these are $1500 folks.
@@Brownie-tg3nu maybe you have very soiled clothes I don’t know, but for the average person they work absolutely fine they don’t ruin your clothes.
And for those that know how to wash, they have longer cycles so they can clean very dirty clothes if you want a longer cycle like all the front loaders half an hour, an hour and a half, and the wash plate washers, you have to know what you’re doing.
@@petermaz701 well you just said it,if you want gentle buy a front loader,not a Top loader that performs crummy and uses 50 gallons of water that you pay for. On the other hand, I’m willing to pay for the Speed Queen TC that actually cleans well. I’m very pro front loader. The machines with the wash plate do fine as long as you only wash small loads. Forget about washing a large load because they suck.
This is the same as any other HE Washer. It doesn’t clean clothes and it’s a waste of time and money. Yeah it’s barely agitating the clothes. It’s making a groaning sound as if it’s in pain. I’ll stick with my non HE washer.
You should've used hot water, heavy duty cycle, and better detergent. There's nothing wrong with it lasting more time, I mean if you want quality results then you have to learn how to wait.
Well you also need a quality wash system as well to clean anything in the first place.
@@Goldenwoodz truth
He didn’t use any detergent.
Did you use soap in order to get these oily rags clean?
I couldnt continually watch, but was there ever any turnover of the load?
A little blooming but not even a full turnover.
@@DylBuilder1 Thank you.
Very informative
😮 What?! No dose of Pine-Sol? I think I like the agitator action on the Maytag commercial series better for time and turn-over.
The TR series works differently! Tub and the adjustors works together , it forces the water through the load. There is no turnover at all. People have to get use to the new way it works!
@DyIBuilder1 - I just checked out your latest SQ TC5 2022. It has that desirable agitator movement that is not as dependent on using the drum to "move the water". Very nice.
@@gregcampbell4467 Thanks for watching my video!
@@DylBuilder1 and the speed queen will still be running 3 maytag machines later....
Why is the water so brown? Have you been putting mud on them?
I'm not really feeling this type. The clothes don't seem to be turning over.
If i want a bathtub style washer and washing method , I'll get one. Otherwise get me over to some other models salesclerk if you please. This is some time wasting junk.
The agitation on this speed queen is similar to the LG 7305 machine
A gravitron but for clothes! 😁
Does anyone know why in Australia our machines look like this but do not wash like this? The controls are subtly different but largely the same.
Why do Aussie bought machines wash like the old style?
Aussies have the TC models. They wouldn't put up with this nonsense
You obviously didn’t read instructions on not putting oily items in the washer. It’s dangerous. Shop towels are cheap and meant to be thrown away.
I you think I am going to sit here and watch a full wash cycle..........Not that crazy yet.
Where do u put poweder dettergent
They made the wash action overly complicated, probably puts a lot of strain on the machine,I bet it will be a nightmare and not last very long
Mine didn't. It lasted a year and a half u til the machine was no good and had to be scrapped
@@DylBuilder1scrapped? You didn't use the warranty? I would have at least gotten it fixed and sold it to cut my loses. I imagine such a machine will do fine with light loads but the heavier the load, the more it gets worn out. The classic models probably dont care as much on the size of the load.
@@joemann7971 I did. It was deemed unrepairable by SQ under warranty, they tried fixing it so many times to the point where they started replacing stuff multiple times, so they replaced the machine and i sold the new one in the box, so it all worked out! :D
I agree. It did alright with the smaller loads but not with large loads. The classic models definitely have a stronger drive system, and they handle big loads with ease.
Nope. I will stick with my 1987 Kenmore Limited Edition Electronic Fabric Care set.
This is the most delicate wash I’ve ever seen. My whirlpool does a better job without the agitator than this.
I’ve had speed queens they last long but they don’t clean very well if they could just make a machine to last and clean well then they would be perfect
Their front loaders clean well especially with heavy duty and extended cycles
@@LlyleHunterPeople don't realize that. And they rinse several times, and still use much less water.
@@LlyleHunter how do they handle light hand wash cycles. For say two blouses? Thanks
I know Speed Queens are better built machines, But I would take the Maytag MVWP586GW over this. We have had the older model without the small load setting for 3+ years. So far no problems. The turnover rate of clothes seem much better on our Maytag.
Exactly. Who cares about quality and having it for 20 years if it doesn’t clean well
Can you do a video of a gtw585bsvws please?
Flexwash?
The wash water looks like brown Gravy, lol.
No detergent?😱
shoulda done a pre soak with that filth
Yeah, I can see my filthy gardening clothes coming out still dirt stained after a wash in this Speed Queen...
I think this load need prewash, hot water, a LOT of detergent and additional rinses. This is a bit painful to watch…🙈 and sound of this machine is a bit scary😅
No rinse with final spin??
If it did that it would rinse the fabric sotener out.
@@deshull
And if you don't use fabric softener?
So this must be the soak cycle.
No roll over whatever.
World's slowest washer
those towels were gross. if you picked heavy soil and presoak and extra rinse everything would've been even cleaner than it already was, which was very clean
I love my LG top-load washing machine I would never buy this washing machine.
This machines performance is absolutely irritating to even watch. Such a disappointment of a machine. My dad bought this machine unknowingly of its horrible performance. Thank you for the wonderful upload though great video.
Holy crap, that is so terrible! How did they go back to making such crap units after the success of that one 2019 model that worked just like the classics?
I thought speed queen abandoned the agitub design and went back to the conventional setup in 2019....
They offer both.
Oh I see
Looks like you didn't use the right settings. Those shop cloths were filthy and you probably put the water level too high so weren't able to rub together enough to help with the cleaning. Did you even use detergent? I don't think you did.
Personally in my opinion he over loaded it. If he would have put a little less in I think that turn over would have been better (items stayed on top of the water way too long).. Would love to see him try that so we could see it.
What the heck is this mess ? I just looked at a 1970s belt drive Kenmore with a water fall lint filter with excellent turnover . Then i come and see this modern junk ? This is ridiculous.
TR7 simply doesn't wash well.
Expensive turd with decent options but horrible roll over. They could have programmed the TR series to wash like the TC minus a transmission. Wonder why they went with the ultra soft, limp wristed washing action? Might as well buy a front loader and save money on water and detergent and probably get better results. That's coming from a hardcore vintage top loading user.
Absolutely agree. No rollover whatsoever. A front loader would do a better job, with a significant water savings.
...also, with this amount of filth, a prewash cycle is needed for any washing machine, I'm a guy and even I know that...:)
Add some soap
Absolutely no roll over 🤔
Umm... is it suppose to do that???!!!! That thing has like zero turn over because of that slow demon possessed sounding slow oooo....
....
oooooo.......
.......
oooooo......
.........
agitation..
What were they thinking with this one..
How is that supposed to scrub the clothes??
I don't understand what happened there..
Speed queens are usually good machines...
But this one..
Maybe not so much?
BLEH. NO THANK YOU!
Negative ten/10
@@DylBuilder1 lmfao
Do any of you who are giving this washer such negative comments? You don't, cause if you did, you know it's not bad, it's just a different wash system. Unfortunately the days of the old Westinghouse, Fridgaire, G.E. are over. Yes I own one, and after I learned how it works, it's fine
@@johnalbanese30 my friend did. It SUCKED. Didn’t get ANY of his clothes clean. I used it. Threw itself off balance on every spin.
@@johnalbanese30 Oh okay enjoy stinky smelly clothes and enjoy throwing $1400 in the trash after a few years. I owned one, can say confidently it's the worst washer I ever owned.
The older Speed Queens with geared transmissions were WAY better, washed better, and lasted longer than this rubbish. No wonder it was on its way to get scrapped.
That's what you get when private businesses allow Government fools to dictate to them how and what they may manufacture.
One of these machines rammed up a nostril will get the message home very clearly to stay out of private enterprise.
And after spending all that money all they really needed to do was add their brilliant automatic water leveling system to their traditional washer and the world would have been happy.
What happened to the samsung flexwash
think he may have sold it