The Cheapest Watches from the Best Watch Brands | Watchfinder & Co.

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 11 тра 2024
  • Want the BEST watch for the cheapest price? Let's check out the best watches from the best brands at the cheapest prices. Uncover these hidden gems!
    Want to save money on your next watch? The Watchfinder Price Promise means you’ll get the best price. Visit www.watchfinder.com to discover more.
    Follow us on Instagram at: / watchfinderofficial
    Watchfinder is the number one place to buy, sell and exchange premium pre-owned timepieces. Discover more exceptional watches at www.watchfinder.com
  • Навчання та стиль

КОМЕНТАРІ • 460

  • @watchfinder
    @watchfinder  Рік тому

    We know you want more watches…. click here: linktr.ee/watchfinder

  • @M123OCT
    @M123OCT Рік тому +414

    Quite often, I find that these 'cheaper' models are actually the most attractive of the range. For example, the Oyster Perpetual is simply perfection. As soon as you add cyclops, gold, diamonds, complications etc., I think you lose the essential beauty of well-made classic simplicity.

    • @melody3741
      @melody3741 Рік тому +10

      That's why people love the sub so much. It's simple. No complications but a date. Yeah a cyclops but you can get it removed and it's purely for utility.

    • @monwhooperinvasive8064
      @monwhooperinvasive8064 Рік тому +1

      Yeah but a date is quite nice

    • @SDBASKURT
      @SDBASKURT Рік тому +2

      Hahaha I thought the same watching this, like the simple beauty with the brand and great quality is so much more attractive than them adding little complications and pricing it 3-4x more makes me wonder who the hell prefers that?

    • @kyoukan91
      @kyoukan91 Рік тому +3

      I disagree with your statement about it happening quite often. I do agree about the Oyster perpetual though. It's among my favorite in the Rolex lineup.

    • @dude...are-you-sure
      @dude...are-you-sure Рік тому

      @@melody3741 or just get a no date Submariner?

  • @paulbugoni2846
    @paulbugoni2846 Рік тому +27

    Great video again! How about a part 2 featuring brands like Zenith, Ulysses, IWC and Grand Seiko?

  • @FazerWiz
    @FazerWiz Рік тому +15

    The VC is based on the Cartier 1904 MC movement, which I have in a 40mm Santos. It's a brilliant movement with modern features and is the most accurate of all my mechanical watches, keeping within 1-2 seconds per week! I'd be very happy with a VC finished version of it!

  • @Kevinmychael87
    @Kevinmychael87 Рік тому +9

    It's interesting how you made the point of quartz during your debate for TAG Heuer vs the Omega you had just mentioned, however, the Breitling with a quartz movement was about the same price as the Omega mechanical. Love the channel, hope to hear back from you.

  • @spencerneal6476
    @spencerneal6476 Рік тому +4

    Thanks guys. Good work as usual. How about digging up some stunning quartz watches for a later episode 👌

  • @apeace9800
    @apeace9800 Рік тому +20

    I'm with you Andrew. No contest whatsoever. Classiest name in all watchmaking. Superlative quality. Beautiful design. Just esoteric enough. Vacheron.

  • @MisterKnightly
    @MisterKnightly Рік тому +14

    As a fan of the Breitling Colt Skyracer, I can confirm that Breitlight is wonderful. I lust after those Endurance watches daily.

  • @goodjob6582
    @goodjob6582 Рік тому

    Such a great video!!!! I have been waiting for this a longggg time !

  • @mikegeary2112
    @mikegeary2112 Рік тому

    Thank you, lads. Very nice list you've put together. Some surprises there, too be sure.

  • @TheMrFishnDucks
    @TheMrFishnDucks Рік тому +1

    Awesome watches. Might get one of those Breitling as a hiking watch or for cycling. Nice video. Keep up the good work.

  • @Lawrence64
    @Lawrence64 Рік тому +3

    Great video. Omega De Vile date window is at 6 , actually. Cartier has a wonderful weight attached to its name. Tudor to me is the most versatile brand out there, if people think of their ones outside of the boring Rolex like models.

  • @idcook
    @idcook Рік тому +15

    Value wise, I much prefer the Omega.
    For one, I. always prefer mechanical to quartz.
    HOWEVER … That Cartier nearly grabbed me into the screen. I just love the neat classic design. You can’t help but project class with that on your wrist.
    The Tudor also has a clean look.
    The Reverso, alas, for me, the copy doesn't quite measure up to the original.
    The AP I can do without. I just don’t feel it’s worth the price.

  • @ranonkhoo533
    @ranonkhoo533 Рік тому +3

    Cartier and the VC are just timeless designs, beautiful!

  • @Valera_Scotland
    @Valera_Scotland Рік тому +25

    I still feel that buying something from the 2000s - 2010s is the best option. My old Omega Aqua Terra from 2002 was £2300... my current IWC Mark 16 was £2700..a really lovely classic beautiful watch with serious heritage and just super cool.. then there's JLC ultra thins for £3000-4000... Bond seamasters for £3000 or less..... i recently saw a full gold Omega Constellation for £3500 and a Blancpain Villeret stunner for under £4k...When you can get stuff like that, I have no idea why people wait for a year and spend 4-5k on a simple Rolex OP...or even £1000 on a quartz Tag... yes they're solid but no, they're not special, not very thin and not very refined.... I say go older and see what's out there. Buying new is fun, but I'm hooked on value and old elegance. Funny how tastes change. I was lusting after Rolex for years...
    From the choices in this video, 100% Vacheron is the winner here. If only it was 36-38mm

  • @sylversyrfer6894
    @sylversyrfer6894 Рік тому +3

    Winner: VC - especially in the grey colorway - gorgeous! Runner-up: Omega.

  • @markstarmer3677
    @markstarmer3677 Рік тому +10

    I think the Omega and Cartier are superb value for what you get. Well respected brands.

  • @JJPalma-lx5yn
    @JJPalma-lx5yn Рік тому

    Very enjoyable and Educational video! Thanks guys!

  • @thereismoretolifethanrolex
    @thereismoretolifethanrolex Рік тому +41

    I fell for a 1926 with the blue indices and it's an exceptionally well put together watch. The case is equally tactile to a Datejust, although the bracelet is nowhere near an Oyster, but critically, it registers +1 second per day on the timegrapher. incredible value.

    • @benh715
      @benh715 Рік тому +2

      41mm seems a bit big for that type of watch. Very pretty though.

    • @thereismoretolifethanrolex
      @thereismoretolifethanrolex Рік тому

      @@benh715 An interesting observation. While it's generally perceived as more of a dress watch, the steel bracelet and 100m water resistance suggest otherwise. In practice, it is good for everything.

    • @ApurtureSci
      @ApurtureSci 8 місяців тому

      @@benh715 I think the 41 is far too big for the style and simplicity of the dial, which is why I went for a 36mm version (17cm wrist)

  • @morgansmith2087
    @morgansmith2087 Рік тому +3

    I went on the good old interweb and had a squiz at a photo of the VC 56 movement, and it looks fantastic.
    I have to say that, even though I'll never be able to afford one, over time Vacheron Constantine has overtaken Omega as my favourite watch brand 👍

  • @dBsdecibels
    @dBsdecibels Рік тому +5

    Would have loved to see Breguet. I love their style and hand working.

  • @cajanir
    @cajanir Рік тому +136

    My challenge with most of these options (other than the obviously too-small ladies' versions) is that they are only appealing because of the name on the dial. Would you really get that model if it wasn't a Tudor? I'm not a big fan of Breitling but at least that one legit looked like something a Breitling fan might want.

    • @nintendokings
      @nintendokings Рік тому +15

      Exactly. The Tudor is great value…but if it said Tissot I wouldn’t look at it twice

    • @CAIDMASTEROFPYRO
      @CAIDMASTEROFPYRO Рік тому +6

      But it's 2000pounds for a quartz watch with no precious metals or anything, the cost of production on that watch would be in the 10s if not single digits

    • @cajanir
      @cajanir Рік тому +7

      @@CAIDMASTEROFPYRO Yep, the value of the Breitling is highly SUS. But it's not a Moonswatch, so I'm sure it costs a lot more to produce than single digits or 10s.

    • @CAIDMASTEROFPYRO
      @CAIDMASTEROFPYRO Рік тому +2

      @@cajanir Probably true, the movement though definitely sub 100, the case and dial are probably finished to the usual breitling standard

    • @hotpeppermovie
      @hotpeppermovie Рік тому

      @@nintendokings same. I think its good to ask if you want it because you really like the design or you're looking for brand recognition. If it was a tissot I wouldn't buy it either. Better save up for a design that is distinct and has brand recognition to make your moneys worth

  • @Salikaan
    @Salikaan Рік тому +5

    As the owners of a Grey Dial Deville I can say it's great value for the name brand and $$$, it's certainly not cheap by any means though. I'd vote for that and Tudor. The VC isn't a bad price proposition for a VC but you really open yourself up to a lot of really nice pieces at that price range. Also I can't imagine spending 15k for an Steel/Quartz AP good grief, and I like AP but yikes.

  • @kehlew0160
    @kehlew0160 Рік тому +2

    100% agree. The VC FiftySix is my next and last watch.

  • @msfasa
    @msfasa Рік тому

    13:55 “There’s something about this that’s waffle” had me snort coffee out my nose so thanks for that 😂

  • @ericmarseille2
    @ericmarseille2 Рік тому +4

    The Vacheron Constantin is an absolute beauty.

  • @lukerabin5079
    @lukerabin5079 Рік тому

    I do love that London-esque accent you two to rock. Carti-yay! Cracks me up every time.

  • @betog.6229
    @betog.6229 Рік тому +1

    Agreed with the Vacheron. But I would love to see it in person first.

  • @ryanfritz8903
    @ryanfritz8903 Рік тому +23

    I have 2 quartz Seamasters (Red text blue Bond, 2221.80 and a Peter Blake 2264.50. I love how its based on the 60s military Seamasters plus its on the speedy bracelet). I got both in pristine condition for around 2k each. Great build quality, great price, low servicing costs. I want to use my watches and not have to worry about what happens to the them. Love the channel, keep it up guys.

    • @jamesrobert4106
      @jamesrobert4106 Рік тому +2

      Excellent choices 👌. I have had my 2541.80 Goldeneye from new in 2001 and it is flawless to this day.

    • @ryanfritz8903
      @ryanfritz8903 Рік тому +2

      @@jamesrobert4106 Quartz got shammed for being a better movement and getting rid of the art of mechanical. While I can see that argument. The whole point of watches is accurate time. While I have automatic watches, if big name companies offered quartz variants still they’d fly off the shelves. Same build quality, brand name, cheaper servicing costs for your entire ownership. Can’t beat that imo. I do want to get a BB58 tho. Love the looks.

    • @jamesrobert4106
      @jamesrobert4106 Рік тому

      @@ryanfritz8903 I also have automatic watches. I appreciate the skill and beauty of a fine mechanical movement, but to look down on a Quartz watch is nothing but posturing by people who are not genuinely fans of horology.
      Audemars Piguet still make a Quartz Royal Oak and F P Journe makes the Quartz Elegante. Both VERY expensive, incredible pieces. Nobody argues with their Quartz variants.
      The Black bays are superb. I have recently bought a Tudor Royal 41 and the build quality of the brand is exceptional. You will not be disappointed.

  • @billybenson3834
    @billybenson3834 Рік тому +4

    Lol, I'm the guy that goes to Hamilton & Tissot, they're hard to beat. But I also think Longines and Bulova put out some great looking affordable watches for guys like me who are stuck driving 20 year old cars.

  • @generaltheory
    @generaltheory Рік тому +16

    No one's talking about Cartier and I'm ordering one right now. The best of like 10.000 watches for me eventually, no matter the price. Ballon 42 in steel.

  • @billmankin6204
    @billmankin6204 Рік тому +44

    For me, the biggest surprise was the Cartier. That's one hell of a good looking and well finished watch for the price. That said, the Santos line is always what I have lusted after, and sadly, no chance of those being in my price range.

    • @Armoer
      @Armoer Рік тому +2

      Good looking is debatable but well finished is nonsense. It is a cheap steel case with 30m water resistance and just simple all-polished finish, a flat white dial.
      Better off in any way buying a Nomos for half the price. Or if you want a brand name a tudor with diamonds for that price.

    • @Entertainment-
      @Entertainment- 8 місяців тому +1

      You can get a Quartz Santos for the same price

  • @pwally2714
    @pwally2714 Рік тому +1

    Tudor 1926 - 36mm, 39mm 41mm
    Mine is a 39mm with same opaline dial with rose gold indices.
    The bracelet is 80% as good as a DJ Jubilee bracelet minus the immediate adjustability.
    I still have my white dial Tudor 1926 in the rotation with the DJ41, Zenith, Vacheron Constantin, Tudor Black Bay Steel, 18k Universal Geneve Polerouter Date, Seagull 1963

  • @youtubeappreciator
    @youtubeappreciator Рік тому +1

    I bought a 90s quartz Seamaster for ~$700 plus shipping - the 2511.81. The whole 2511 series is really great value IMO.

  • @Caledfryn
    @Caledfryn Рік тому

    Quartz Grand Seiko! Fantastic finishing and top quality quartz movement.

  • @kamronjohnson1040
    @kamronjohnson1040 Рік тому +2

    I honestly love the aquanaut more than the nautilus, so glad I'm not alone on this 😂

  • @dominiccallaghan1176
    @dominiccallaghan1176 Рік тому +2

    I bought the Tag GMT caliber 7 automatic for a grand ten years ago, (approx) brand new and it is still a favorite. Looking at it now next to my Air King which cost 7 times more (approx), and gets way less wrist time, I know which one is better value. I have been offered 1.5 up for the Tag so it is, unusually for the brand, not a bad investment either.

  • @georgegopiao4411
    @georgegopiao4411 Рік тому +1

    I agree on both counts. Best value is the Tudor and the VC.

  • @thomasdawe1837
    @thomasdawe1837 Рік тому +2

    A colleague of mine had the Cartier, and it looked fantastic in person. I definitely would have priced it at 5kish

  • @euanmorse
    @euanmorse Рік тому +1

    Bought a DeVille Prestige and I have to say I love it. Simple and elegeant.

  • @marcjudge680
    @marcjudge680 Рік тому +2

    Would love to own a Lange & Sohne Odessas. The V.C 56 is a affordable option. Would like to see Zenith vids as a ownership of a few and other brands
    Great entertaining viewing.

  • @HelibertATheSushi
    @HelibertATheSushi Рік тому +1

    i bought a vintage Deville and I absolutely love it. All in all with the restoration, €300.

  • @jazzman5598
    @jazzman5598 Рік тому +2

    The 2 hander AP in quartz………I have my Dad’s 2 hander Omega dress watch. It needs a service but still runs. I love it because…how is it possible to hack it, lol 😂 You get close and call it a day. If the watch is a 2 hander, regardless of quartz vs mechanical, you won’t be able to tell. But £18K……….whoa……..I’ll go see about homages on Ali Express 🤪 Really enjoyed this one guys. Good job!

  • @legendus1159
    @legendus1159 Рік тому

    VC hands down,, it is so well prpoprtioned and all.. great stuff

  • @mrdisco99
    @mrdisco99 Рік тому +1

    Andrew kind of alluded to it... The Tudor has a bog standard movement and a case and dial that look like they came from Tissot... which you could get for a third the price... with a better movement!
    My vote goes to Omega... brand prestige, exclusive movement, and design that belies the fact that you sorted by price on the website.

  • @jauharshahbaz
    @jauharshahbaz Рік тому +1

    That sector dial of VC 56 is just 👌

  • @KimSE4
    @KimSE4 Рік тому

    I'd have liked to see Grand Seiko on there - would have been fascinated to get your take on them as I do think they deliver value for the premium price.

  • @GadgetyMV
    @GadgetyMV Рік тому +1

    The Omega with co-axial is attractive, but I've read that the 2500 movement, the first co-axial, based on an ETA has had a history of trouble. There are various versions of the 2500 so it depends on which one is in the watch. While I assume it'll be the latest, I'm not sure. So, which version is it, in the watch I'm getting? As for the TAG Heuer, it's a good looking watch and WR to 200m is nice. There is no spec on the quartz accuracy. If I get quartz I'd prefer a solar/light charged watch that doesn't require being taken in for battery replacement, and I'd probably go for the emperor of quartz, Citizen. Their titanium Promaster Marine CC5006-06L eco-drive with black dlc, and satellite wave, always showing the correct time. It also has the coolest world time zone with some of the time references being diving locations in light blue font.

  • @statlerwaldorf7130
    @statlerwaldorf7130 Рік тому +2

    For me it is the Vacheron, I'll keep saving!!

  • @d7r_tv
    @d7r_tv Рік тому +8

    Not big into dress watches but that blue Vacheron Constantin is gorgeous with the sector dial.

  • @silv3rArrow
    @silv3rArrow Рік тому +1

    Might as well go for a Longines Hydroconquest quartz for the price of that Tag Heuer quartz. Ceramic bezel and if you go for the previous version you can get it with a 2824-2

  • @Ben-yw8be
    @Ben-yw8be Рік тому

    I really like the Cartier tank in quartz and Rolex Oyster perpetual.

  • @justingalore123
    @justingalore123 Рік тому +2

    That cartier is lovely - the solarbeat tank isn’t much more..

  • @ddeboy002
    @ddeboy002 Рік тому

    Wow... the Tudor is actually nice without the cut off hour hand. I like it. Might pick me up one.

  • @becarefulwithafool5019
    @becarefulwithafool5019 Рік тому

    I think you missed Panera base models. Big but unisex. Happy New Year!

  • @basselamjad958
    @basselamjad958 Рік тому +1

    11:54 😆 now this escalated quickly...Tissot PRX Powermatic 80 with the gold fluted bezel and chocolate 🍫 dial is staring through a window 🪟 somewhere afar

  • @TheWitchfinderGenral
    @TheWitchfinderGenral Рік тому +5

    That Vacheron is lovely. Out of all of these, I think that's the one I'd spend cash on. VC must have watched this video because the price has gone up to £11,900

  • @st1tch87
    @st1tch87 Рік тому +3

    The Cartier is insane money for value, you get an 8 year warranty right now and an excellent movement with the Cartier name to boot. Can't go wrong. That being said im still saving for a Santos XD

  • @snapascrew
    @snapascrew Рік тому

    Got me an oyster perpetual 39 in rhodium back in 2019. Great decision.

  • @danlee944
    @danlee944 Рік тому +2

    Great lineup! However, no Grand Seiko or ALS? Title should be the Best *Swiss* Watch Brands! And if Tag is getting a shout out, I think Hamilton might deserve a shout out also.

  • @SanderEvers
    @SanderEvers Рік тому +3

    Now do the reverse: most expensive watch from cheap watch brands.

  • @brunonjezic6208
    @brunonjezic6208 Рік тому

    That Tudor looks great!

  • @willnzsurf
    @willnzsurf Рік тому +14

    A. Lange & Söhne Saxonia would be my pick, also agree with the VC & Tudor being the best "value."

    • @leepenney6104
      @leepenney6104 Рік тому +1

      Was surprised this didn’t get a mention. Yes it’s £18k but it’s mechanical (unlike the AP), its movement is in-house (unlike the VC) and it’s precious metal to boot

  • @IronButterknife
    @IronButterknife Рік тому

    Very good idea for a video thanks.

  • @lousyshot1
    @lousyshot1 Рік тому

    Love your videos. But what about Casio? Is it not one of the best brands?

  • @barrettgarese2267
    @barrettgarese2267 Рік тому

    Never seen that Cartier before - I might be in love.

  • @barfymann362
    @barfymann362 Рік тому +13

    I own two GS Quartz watches now, absolutely stunning.

    • @chevy4x466
      @chevy4x466 Рік тому

      Quartz is better. Mechanical cases r too think. I would enjoy a gs quartz, that and the citizen 100 r the watches I aspire to

  • @thomasd9482
    @thomasd9482 Рік тому +1

    Same I think the Vacheron Constantin is great value for the brand, but the Tudor is definitely the winner. With so much hype around Tudor rn the brand definitely stands out for the money.

  • @hashen_chamal
    @hashen_chamal Рік тому +1

    Could you do another episode with more watch brands?

  • @spazz27
    @spazz27 Рік тому +3

    £3000 for a co-axial movement? What’s the cheapest co-axial watch by George Daniels (or that isn’t an Omega), that’s how good a deal that is… loved this video and idea… you could easily have called this “the best watch from every brand” and you wouldn’t be far off! 👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼

  • @saisriramtekumalla6109
    @saisriramtekumalla6109 Рік тому +1

    I agree to that omega de ville is more valuable that Tag even if I pay more for it

  • @thomasont
    @thomasont Рік тому +1

    Best value watch I've known from brand power public perspective and monetary value plus good value retention would be, Rolex Oyster Royal Precision, Air-King Precision and Oyster Date Precision, which I've own, hands down. 👑⌚👍

  • @simonrosenfelder635
    @simonrosenfelder635 Рік тому

    I remember a few years ago seeing an advert for an AP ladies watch in rose gold with a diamond bezel and asking a contact for a price, got a quote of around 25k usd , seems good value nowadays.....

  • @thehistoryprof6750
    @thehistoryprof6750 Рік тому

    Speaking of brands. This reminds me of a couple of young professionals I worked with in LA many yrs ago. They were thrilled when they purchased his and her BMWs, the small 3 series. Fast forward a couple of yrs later they had gotten rid of both cars...saying, the only thing special about them was the blue and white label !

  • @Megingiard
    @Megingiard Рік тому +1

    5:11 "date window at 3" shows a version where it is at 6 :D

  • @hypersynesthesia
    @hypersynesthesia Рік тому +1

    I think what this all comes down to is not just “which brand do you want” but “why do you want it so badly?”. As you said, with some of these watches, you can get all the looks or functionality with a less high status brand. So if it’s the status of the brand, rather than the specific build quality/unique looks…why does that matter so much? Why does wearing the logo matter to you if you aren’t really buying the characteristics that, on paper, justify the fat price tag? (Don’t let me go into where marketing sits on the balance sheet 👀)
    To kinda rhetorically answer that, I have some high-end wishlist items, and they’re watches where, if I were to wear a similar looking piece by a cheaper brand, I think I would feel like I was trying too hard to pretend I had the more expensive option. And then you’d never want people to look closely at it. That feels on a par with clinging to the lowest rung of an expensive brand just to have something by them. Neither feel like great options. So until I can afford the specific watches I want, I prefer to look for models from less expensive brands (and vintage options) whose own designs speak for themselves.

  • @SgtCrypto
    @SgtCrypto Рік тому

    Marine hymn for the intro subbed

  • @Stinger430
    @Stinger430 Рік тому

    The DeVille is lovely! It would be my pick, especially as I have baby sized wrists.

  • @mendipfox1650
    @mendipfox1650 Рік тому

    My wife has the Rolex 124200 OP in blue. Lovely woman’s watch. Looks great on her wrist. Sporty yet a touch of elegance. The 28mm & 31mm are slightly cheaper than the 34mm. Still have the 2232 caliber inside @ £4,400 & £4450 respectively.

  • @maxseitz8069
    @maxseitz8069 Рік тому +2

    Hi Andrew, I love your videos. However, I have a question for Watchfinder: Why don’t they reply to offers? That’s been my experience so far and apparently, according to several watch forums, it’s been happening to other people as well. What’s the point then of having a “Make an offer button? I would appreciate your comments. Thanks!

    • @mendipfox1650
      @mendipfox1650 Рік тому

      I reckon that might be down to how realistic the offer is. 😂 what was your last offer price and advertised price? Out of interest….. to have some context, I’ve offered and been successful in buying a watch with Watchfinder at a reduced price. Not just a completely random comment.

    • @maxseitz8069
      @maxseitz8069 Рік тому

      @@mendipfox1650 I appreciate your comment. Whatever the offer, they should reply. No replying is being dismissive to customers, don’t you think? I might look somewhere else.

  • @Harpreet06
    @Harpreet06 Рік тому +1

    The problem I have with Tudor is that it seems like the poor mans rolex if that makes sense. Similar to how people say a Skoda is a poor mans Audi etc.

  • @watcheswithabdullah
    @watcheswithabdullah Рік тому +1

    10:30 'Yes I hadn't heard of it either' - I literally spat out water at that! Tom is too hilarious! 😂

  • @edn.3442
    @edn.3442 Рік тому +1

    I agree with Andrew. The Vacheron is the clear value winner of the bunch.

  • @AtheistOrphan
    @AtheistOrphan Рік тому +4

    I have a Watches of Switzerland catalogue from 1988 showing a small quartz plastic-cased Tag Heuer (in a variety of colours) new for £79.95. That’s just £198.55 in 2022! Admittedly all the other Tags were considerably more expensive.

    • @AnggaTirtaFL
      @AnggaTirtaFL Рік тому

      I personally don't feel Tag appealing enough to my liking. As they said, with that much value on a Tag Heuer instead what can i get from Tissot or Hamilton. But again if you chasing Brands name you go with Tag (but i doubt nowadays Tag are not so much respectful), and if you seek for a more spec and functionality then go with Tissot or Hamilton. And don't forget Oris and Mido also.

    • @kelechinobi3085
      @kelechinobi3085 Рік тому

      Honestly? I’m never really sure what to make of Tag. There seem to me to be a bunch of watches in the tissot / Hamilton, oris range... a bunch of watches above them (Rolex, Omega, JLC, Gs). And then there’s Tag 🤷🏾‍♂️

    • @jamesrobert4106
      @jamesrobert4106 Рік тому

      It is hard to fathom. I bought a brand new F1 Khaki rubber strap, Quartz in 2013 for £435.00
      Now discontinued and worth more, but I will never sell it.

  • @calvinchann1996
    @calvinchann1996 Рік тому

    Agree on the Vacheron Constantin.

  • @RoelfvanderMerwe
    @RoelfvanderMerwe Рік тому +15

    That Vacheron is stunning.... And it's about the same price as a Submariner. That's just insane!

    • @junhaoxu2724
      @junhaoxu2724 Рік тому

      I know right?! Funnily enough I have both, and the Fiftysix makes the Submariner seem like a terrible deal 😂

    • @juniorjr5328
      @juniorjr5328 Рік тому +1

      Yep CArtier movement

    • @comment1637
      @comment1637 Рік тому +1

      @@junhaoxu2724 it’s not a Vacheron movement tho. If Rolls Royce builds a car with a Kia engine it’s not a RR.

    • @junhaoxu2724
      @junhaoxu2724 Рік тому +1

      @@comment1637 You know who else doesn't have a Vacheron movement? Rolex. I honestly don't think there is any other watch under $15k that has a better-finished movement than this one, and I reaaaally like JLC.
      The better analogy is probably more like a RR car that is built with a BMW engine. The latter is undoubtedly inferior, but not by much.

    • @srw6772
      @srw6772 Рік тому +1

      @@junhaoxu2724 The Submariner is a terrible deal lol
      The Seamaster is much better value imo

  • @teruphoto
    @teruphoto Рік тому +1

    Dammit...I was fine not having a Holy Trinity watch but now I can't think of anything but the VC56...

  • @norbert_engel
    @norbert_engel Рік тому

    That Cartier is stunning😍

  • @alichehab5804
    @alichehab5804 Рік тому

    Great vid

  • @Todd.T
    @Todd.T Рік тому +3

    ALS Saxonia series
    Breguet Classique series
    Breguet Type XX-XXI-XXII series
    Blancpain Villeret series
    Chopard LUC
    Glashutte Original Senator
    Jaeger Le Coultre Master series
    Zenith Captain series

  • @philjones6449
    @philjones6449 Рік тому +1

    That VC is amazing ‘value’ compared to some of the crazy inflated grey market prices.

  • @paulclay1234
    @paulclay1234 Рік тому +1

    I have a 2022 Vacheron Constantin FiftySix... great watch ⌚️

  • @ceecee130x
    @ceecee130x Рік тому

    How about:
    Cartier Tank Must Solarbeat?
    Longines Dolce Vita (rectangular sector)?

  • @pskupferman
    @pskupferman Рік тому

    Longine Flagship for 5000 in yellow gold and incredible case back with cote geneve and perlage

  • @sharadskywalker
    @sharadskywalker Рік тому +2

    Tudor is the winner here. Everyday office watch with mechanical movement for 1500

    • @garyboyle695
      @garyboyle695 Рік тому +2

      That would be half the price with any other brand name on it. Nothing special about the watch at all.

  • @folumb
    @folumb Рік тому

    I went to the Patek Phillipe boutique in Miami 3 weeks ago and was quoted $31,000 for a calatrava. The associate said that was entry level patek. Nice to know there's a "cheaper" entry level

  • @steveg4082
    @steveg4082 Рік тому

    How did AP solve the problem of making the quartz second hand hit all the minute markers? (Especially when citizen creates anti backlash subsystems, etc.)

  • @9erMatthew
    @9erMatthew Рік тому +1

    I consider the true value in Tudor's 1926 comes into play on the 36mm and under models. Small watch, 100M of water resistance, and well regulated. For that price point, it's competition doesn't come close.

  • @1nvd
    @1nvd Рік тому

    Can you list the watches one day? I can’t keep up and need a list

  • @giorgio0255
    @giorgio0255 Рік тому

    What about the Grand Seiko SBGX263?