Thanks for stopping by my friends you can watch the brothers war story here - ua-cam.com/video/_DDBroku63I/v-deo.html I will be livestreaming today on my livestream channel - ua-cam.com/channels/qBfsO3ISW41z711BIQg97w.html
20:13 - look closely, she's not buried under the rats. She's literally eaten alive and her stretched and pulled in all directions by rats is the only thing left. Kinda metal and brutal card for modern MTG.
Bolshack Dragon is hilarious! I started playing YGO before being so Alienated by the speed of the game that I switched to MTG. People complain about how OP MTG cards have gotten "and that's fair, power creep is getting rough" but compared to YGO, MTG is slow af! YGO isn't fun at all anymore.
That flavor text of Control of the Court tho: "Power-hungry eunuchs, the curse of the dynasty, have thrown the masses of the people into the depths of misery."
Eunuchs held a lot of administrative power in the imperial court, as they were entrusted with making policy decisions and managing the affairs of the inner palace where the emperor's concubines resided. I don't see anything too outlandish about the flavor text.
6:50 I think most examples of this comes from Japan, and one way to look at it is through currency. The Japanese yen are usually counted in terms of hundreds at the smallest. It makes sense that a game could piggyback on the inherent 'money math skills' common folk have. Some people I know might be turned off by school maths but suddenly become experts when it comes to splitting the bill or calculating change.
Yeah it may be a cultural related things in some way, but the real reason is a game design concept called granularity. Basically, it helps to keep the game easy to balance
Rather than 'money math' I think its more related to the familiarity of the range of numbers that you see every day and even moreso the 'bigger == better' aspect of human psychology. Like people that use Fahrenheit instead of Celsius think the range of numbers feels better for no real reason other than that it includes 100.
It's too bad WOTC has decided that no one outside of the cons are gonna see any of the mystery boxes. The choices they've been making are just insane. Got my first box of Bloomburrow, and either i got unlucky, or they're really screwing over the play boosters. only 3 alt art cards in the entire box. and value wise was no good either, though i'll be trying to eventually collect one of the entire set.
Pulling cards from all available sets was a great move. So many old things that were just digital or in extras like Vanguard. Too bad these boxes are "convention only" so far! 😞
As soon as I saw Karn, I thought "Vanguard!" I've 4 Vanguard cards I got as promos back in the 90's. I never did play Vanguard but I'd like to try one day.
I agree. I’d super chat to show my love for his work, and I encourage everyone who enjoys the Hatcher community and has the means to do so to do the same.
I already mentioned this at another youtube channel, but with all the weird design and weird art with multiple different versions of the same card, along with the growth in quality from Chinese proxies, the presence of proxies at official events will soon become a problem, if its not a problem already that hasn't been noticed yet.
And the Omnipresent Impostor also has the Basic supertype. Quite strange. I wonder how is it supposed to interact with other cards, as the most common reference to Basic is for cards that lets you tutor out basic lands form your deck, but the Impostor already has the ability to be searched in place of anything else. 🤔
@@enricomassignani 🤔 I can't find any reference in the rules about deck-building constraints (or lack of) intrinsic to the Basic supertype. Rule 100.2a specifically mentions basic LANDS. And the Oracle text of Relentless Rats doesn't treat them as a Basic Creature, for example.
Yes. He compared it to Kamahl because that barbarian was originally a red card and got a green version, going from rage to tranquility, sort of like Teferi might change.
@@derrickpaulson3093 Comparing it to Kamahl though is weird because the red and green versions are completely different. This Teferi is literally the same as the original Teferi. To be fair though I felt like the original Teferi was meant to be green just because it focused more on the creature aspect than instant and sorcery.
I think Bolshack Dragon would be a surprisingly fair card if it was actually printed. It doesn't have haste, and has no flying that you usually see on dragons. And it's six whole mana with no built-in protection. A card like this might just be a genuinely good addition to the game.
You can see part of the many titles Belzenlok is giving to himself on Cabal Evangel (DOM): Evincar of the Stronghold, Scion of Darkness, Doom of Fools, Lord of the Wastes, Master of the Even Hand, Eternal Patriarch of the Cabal Yes, Lord of the Wastes. He stole Yawgmoth’s title. Bro thinks he’s Him.
Wow, we're getting the Future Sight frame back? Nice. I liked it. The symbols on the top left corner made it easier to find the type of cards you were looking for, when you had a bunch of those in a pile. The Impostor having every card's name is troublesome, as it would function as at least, the 5th copy of each non basic land in your regular deck... Unless they gave it a rules text to avoid that, if you had 4 of those guys, it would mean the rest of your deck would be made of 56 basic lands...
They could easily make Rusko a legit card by templating it to say "....create a Midnight Clock token that has " *insert Midnight Clock text here* " and I doubt it would be all that overpowered in commander
I imagined the V Dragon was using it's claws to attack. Three claws per front limb equal 6 sides to the die. I suppose the 5 is it's "claw" damage and the X is supposed to be the flame. Either way cool card
With WotC having revisited Planechase, and with them about to revisit Archenemy, I am hoping this reuse of art hints at them revisiting Vanguard. I have the full sets of all of them, and I would like to see more Vanguard.
Control of the Court is not very powerful, you say? I think Faithless Looting would beg to differ. Yes, it's double the cost, but it's double the cards drawn. Yes, it's discard at random, but you end up plus one card. I don't know if the probability math adds up, but I'll bet someone out there wants to break it.
It's not really +1 net, but rather that it replaces itself. It could matter for decks that care about card draw or one's with incidental bonuses (like Sheoldred, the Apocalypse) but the random nature of the discards can lead to problems unless it's a reanimator or self-mill style deck. Which could probably be exactly where it would see play.
I always wondered how they would tackle space issues with the Future Sight card frame. O-kagochi shows us what happens when it gets full. Are there any cards that might now fit on the card frame?
It's not actually full - the pips extend further down the curve, there are 6 more mana symbol slots if you look through the type line and text box, 12 slots total
@@iansanford6544 Good point. Those definitely could be used. I'm not sure it would look all that great. Casting costs hidden behind text boxes might look a little awful.
why are some of these cards the best examples of effects that match flavor perfectly, how did they go so hard on the flavor for cards that are generally not available or legal to play.
i'm not too happy about Rusko. They literally just put another "win condition" on the command zone. Literally may as well just read "Whenever you cast a noncreature spell, each opponent loses 1 life." Cards like Ghostly Flicker are going to spike in price for a bit. This may be "Nadu 2.0" because it takes less to make work AND access to spell protection.
@@The_Dying_Rose he's not AI, but just of lower quality than the art one expects to see on a Magic card, due to him being an Alchemy card. If you look at Alchemy cards, very few of them are on par with the average quality of artwork in premier sets. They make less money from the digital exclusive cards, so they probably pay less for commissions, lack strong art direction, and don't call in any favors from their vanguard artists.
it is bonkers to think they put conjure into paper cards even in an un-set card. When u conjure in MTGA you get a real copy of a card that can go to your grave & even be shuffled into your deck. Not a token. To play it right you need to own the un-set card & one copy of the cared it conjures.
if u ask me, what they should have done with rusko, I would say. Conjure a card from outside of the game called midnight clock, & put it into play, & force the player to own the card & have as part of a side board. Then make rusko Loos this text when u control midnight clock, so u can only get one.
"Has all Card names" means you better not be playing any other Legendries without a Mirror thing or that one Sakashima in play. EDIT or does that only work if both are Legendary? I might have messed that up... Oh that was TEFERI as a Green Druid. I thought it was Garruk there for a moment and wondered why he cared about stopping people from casting at Instant Speed.
yeah, im one of them. i just cant resist trying to break his stupid face. i hang ok vs him lifetime, probably 30-35% win rate with a Heliod Removal/Angel/Lifegain deck. i suspect wins are vs noob suboptimal decks. I dont see him that often lately.
@@Leevodevo irrelevant? This card is only useful in those hellbent situations. Gamble is good because the card you want to keep in your hand isn't likely to be discarded, but Control the Court means the chances are flipped. If you HAD something you wanted to keep, you don't cast Control
Dangit! I've been working on (playing around with really) my own custom Magic set for a while now (too long), and every innovation I intended to shock the world with has been stolen (they're watching me) by Wizards and made into actual Magic cards*. Now, they've got a Basic Creature in the form of Omnipresent Impostor. I assume that "(A deck may have any number of basic cards.)", which is how my Basic Creatures display their reminder text. Think about it. There's no reason why the Basic supertype can't appear on nonland cards. You can stop reading here if you value your sanity. * A short, off-the-top-of-my-head, and incomplete list of my "stolen" concepts include: Warlock as a new creature type, the proliferation of Clues, Treasures and Food, the return of double-faced cards outside of Innistrad, more cards like Lord Gonti that let a player 'steal' opponents' cards (and a keyword action to go with it [Heist]), batching evil-doer creature types together (I called them villains, but Pirates weren't as common when I started -- I used Minions instead), bringing back Mercenaries and expanding their color identity beyond Black, the use of the term Secret Lair (yeah, I've been at this megaproject [over a thousand cards and counting!] since before Dominaria came out), the return of hideaway, crafting an entire world around the themes of crime/criminals (they did it twice already!), creating a serious Magic set in the style of a pre-existing intellectual property (aka Universes Beyond), offering a secondary product that is closely tied to the main product (it's a four-set block, really) in the form of preconstructed decks (like the Commander decks you see today), and more. I suppose great minds think alike, but man, does it suck not making it to print first. It makes my original designs feel derivative. I still have some tricks up my sleeve, and I'm taking what I can from canon Magic when it fits like the way I have a counters-matter subtheme in one of the sets in the block and stun counters (and ability counters, for that matter) are a really clean way to go beyond simple +1/+1 counters.
...and sometimes the similarities are eerily specific, like Bloomburrow's cycle of "Duo" creatures with two relevant creature types sporting compound names that end in 'Duo' and describe both parts of the duo and have abilities either faction would find useful. (Okay, so that last bit only makes sense, but you know what I mean.)
Between test cards and acorn cards its seems like most of this set is unplayable in sanctioned magic. Far as im concerned they may as well have slapped an Un in front of Mystery. Imo this set isn't worth buying packs of. If i get anything it'll just be singles
no, that opens up the ability for infinite rolls which will probably combo with a card in the future that gives mana for every roll or pings for every roll or ventures for every roll, etc.
Isnt it impossible to have more than 4 copies of that card and the rest is lands because you cant have more than 4 copies of uniquely named cards? Or is the wording on the deck construction around multiple copies of cards different than that? I play a lot of card games and this type of detail can get mixed up from game to game.
Since Omnipresent Impostor has the Basic supertype, I want to think that means you can have any number of them in your deck, just like with basic lands.
Thanks for stopping by my friends you can watch the brothers war story here - ua-cam.com/video/_DDBroku63I/v-deo.html
I will be livestreaming today on my livestream channel - ua-cam.com/channels/qBfsO3ISW41z711BIQg97w.html
2nd week in a roll that my lgs sold out of Bloomburrow and now this produce you’re reviewing that won’t be available to players at stores at all.
Amazon
@justinburnet7718 I belive mystery booster 2 will be convention exclusive
20:13 - look closely, she's not buried under the rats. She's literally eaten alive and her stretched and pulled in all directions by rats is the only thing left. Kinda metal and brutal card for modern MTG.
Bolshack Dragon is hilarious! I started playing YGO before being so Alienated by the speed of the game that I switched to MTG. People complain about how OP MTG cards have gotten "and that's fair, power creep is getting rough" but compared to YGO, MTG is slow af! YGO isn't fun at all anymore.
Head Canon, O-Kagachi is Liam Neeson doing a Taken
That flavor text of Control of the Court tho:
"Power-hungry eunuchs, the curse of the dynasty, have thrown the masses of the people into the depths of misery."
Eunuchs held a lot of administrative power in the imperial court, as they were entrusted with making policy decisions and managing the affairs of the inner palace where the emperor's concubines resided. I don't see anything too outlandish about the flavor text.
So incels were a problem back in ancient times too, cool.
@@collinbeal I think he's saying how it relates to Hasbro and the current state of mtg and is quite foreboding
@@Leevodevo Hasbro execs aren't castrated, though 💀💀💀
6:50
I think most examples of this comes from Japan, and one way to look at it is through currency. The Japanese yen are usually counted in terms of hundreds at the smallest. It makes sense that a game could piggyback on the inherent 'money math skills' common folk have. Some people I know might be turned off by school maths but suddenly become experts when it comes to splitting the bill or calculating change.
Yeah it may be a cultural related things in some way, but the real reason is a game design concept called granularity. Basically, it helps to keep the game easy to balance
Rather than 'money math' I think its more related to the familiarity of the range of numbers that you see every day and even moreso the 'bigger == better' aspect of human psychology. Like people that use Fahrenheit instead of Celsius think the range of numbers feels better for no real reason other than that it includes 100.
It's too bad WOTC has decided that no one outside of the cons are gonna see any of the mystery boxes. The choices they've been making are just insane. Got my first box of Bloomburrow, and either i got unlucky, or they're really screwing over the play boosters. only 3 alt art cards in the entire box. and value wise was no good either, though i'll be trying to eventually collect one of the entire set.
Pulling cards from all available sets was a great move. So many old things that were just digital or in extras like Vanguard. Too bad these boxes are "convention only" so far! 😞
*artificial scarcity*, YAY!
As soon as I saw Karn, I thought "Vanguard!" I've 4 Vanguard cards I got as promos back in the 90's. I never did play Vanguard but I'd like to try one day.
This guy is the most entertaining guy on the internet, if you dont count famous comedians, lol, and his live streams are basically crowd work.
I agree. I’d super chat to show my love for his work, and I encourage everyone who enjoys the Hatcher community and has the means to do so to do the same.
It's another crazy day ... and his bones hurt!
The biggest problem for him is his topic… magic sucks now and Wotc is just a work trash bag company.
Fantasy geographic goes hard AF people.
On the notion of other card games giving 1000 power instead of 1, Pinball Scoring inflation is a real thing. Talk to your CCGs about it today.
I already mentioned this at another youtube channel, but with all the weird design and weird art with multiple different versions of the same card, along with the growth in quality from Chinese proxies, the presence of proxies at official events will soon become a problem, if its not a problem already that hasn't been noticed yet.
Rusko is a great flavor win! I remember him teaching Urza to call the clock key "Urza's Clock Key" because you GOTTA enforce the brand.
We don't talk about Rusko
My bones hurt a little less today thanks to this video!
That Gix art is from an old Vanguard card.
Love the new gix style, wish i could get it.
Also, i think Rusko looks kind of ai generated due to his art style. Hopefully it isn't.
And the Omnipresent Impostor also has the Basic supertype. Quite strange. I wonder how is it supposed to interact with other cards, as the most common reference to Basic is for cards that lets you tutor out basic lands form your deck, but the Impostor already has the ability to be searched in place of anything else. 🤔
It means you can have any number of Impostors in your deck, Relentless Rats style.
@@enricomassignani 🤔
I can't find any reference in the rules about deck-building constraints (or lack of) intrinsic to the Basic supertype. Rule 100.2a specifically mentions basic LANDS.
And the Oracle text of Relentless Rats doesn't treat them as a Basic Creature, for example.
15:15 Isn't this just Teferi, Mage of Zhalfir but the casting cost is now green instead of blue?
Yes. He compared it to Kamahl because that barbarian was originally a red card and got a green version, going from rage to tranquility, sort of like Teferi might change.
@@derrickpaulson3093 Comparing it to Kamahl though is weird because the red and green versions are completely different. This Teferi is literally the same as the original Teferi.
To be fair though I felt like the original Teferi was meant to be green just because it focused more on the creature aspect than instant and sorcery.
@@stephenhousman6975 Teferi, Mage of zalphyr is like Yaeva with the Time Raveler static
@@Lemon_Sage9999 Hence why I said what I said. The text on the play test card is the exact same as the real card just color shifted.
I think Bolshack Dragon would be a surprisingly fair card if it was actually printed. It doesn't have haste, and has no flying that you usually see on dragons. And it's six whole mana with no built-in protection. A card like this might just be a genuinely good addition to the game.
You can see part of the many titles Belzenlok is giving to himself on Cabal Evangel (DOM): Evincar of the Stronghold, Scion of Darkness, Doom of Fools, Lord of the Wastes, Master of the Even Hand, Eternal Patriarch of the Cabal
Yes, Lord of the Wastes. He stole Yawgmoth’s title. Bro thinks he’s Him.
Wow, we're getting the Future Sight frame back?
Nice. I liked it. The symbols on the top left corner made it easier to find the type of cards you were looking for, when you had a bunch of those in a pile.
The Impostor having every card's name is troublesome, as it would function as at least, the 5th copy of each non basic land in your regular deck... Unless they gave it a rules text to avoid that, if you had 4 of those guys, it would mean the rest of your deck would be made of 56 basic lands...
These are some really cool cards. I appreciate you sharing these. Thank you for the video Magic Historian.
They could easily make Rusko a legit card by templating it to say "....create a Midnight Clock token that has " *insert Midnight Clock text here* " and I doubt it would be all that overpowered in commander
I imagined the V Dragon was using it's claws to attack. Three claws per front limb equal 6 sides to the die. I suppose the 5 is it's "claw" damage and the X is supposed to be the flame. Either way cool card
That Teferi reminds me of Yeva... but they had to make him slightly more broken, of course.
A card that says it has all card names is just absolutely wild to me. Who knows what sort of antics this will enable.
I didn't know that was previous art for Titania. I thought WotC had finally done something smart and worked with Rebecca Guay again. Silly me.
With WotC having revisited Planechase, and with them about to revisit Archenemy, I am hoping this reuse of art hints at them revisiting Vanguard. I have the full sets of all of them, and I would like to see more Vanguard.
Control of the Court is not very powerful, you say? I think Faithless Looting would beg to differ. Yes, it's double the cost, but it's double the cards drawn. Yes, it's discard at random, but you end up plus one card. I don't know if the probability math adds up, but I'll bet someone out there wants to break it.
It's not really +1 net, but rather that it replaces itself. It could matter for decks that care about card draw or one's with incidental bonuses (like Sheoldred, the Apocalypse) but the random nature of the discards can lead to problems unless it's a reanimator or self-mill style deck. Which could probably be exactly where it would see play.
@@AtriumXP666 which in those cases and decks it's busted lol
@@jdonvance I said the exact same thing before I read ur post lol
Bolshack Dragon has given me an idea, Secret Lair: Duel Masters/Kaijudo
Restrictions on art is WILD....
Is it really a surprise? 🤔 🤣
I always wondered how they would tackle space issues with the Future Sight card frame. O-kagochi shows us what happens when it gets full. Are there any cards that might now fit on the card frame?
It's not actually full - the pips extend further down the curve, there are 6 more mana symbol slots if you look through the type line and text box, 12 slots total
@@iansanford6544 Good point. Those definitely could be used. I'm not sure it would look all that great. Casting costs hidden behind text boxes might look a little awful.
@@everydayesperanto Probably looks a lot better in full art / textless. Inb4 "experimental" design
@@iansanford6544 agreed
why are some of these cards the best examples of effects that match flavor perfectly, how did they go so hard on the flavor for cards that are generally not available or legal to play.
15:22 am I missong something or isn't that literally a colorshifted Teferi Mage of Zhalfir?
As a bird lawyer and lover, I support the Hatcher Entertainment Network (HEN).
15:30 also, Teferi devoids all the counterspells :D
I always thought Vanguard was a prototype for planeswalker cards
i'm not too happy about Rusko. They literally just put another "win condition" on the command zone. Literally may as well just read "Whenever you cast a noncreature spell, each opponent loses 1 life." Cards like Ghostly Flicker are going to spike in price for a bit. This may be "Nadu 2.0" because it takes less to make work AND access to spell protection.
It's literally not legal anywhere outside of Mystery Booster Draft.
Am I the only one who thinks he looks kinda ai generated?
@@The_Dying_Rose he's not AI, but just of lower quality than the art one expects to see on a Magic card, due to him being an Alchemy card. If you look at Alchemy cards, very few of them are on par with the average quality of artwork in premier sets. They make less money from the digital exclusive cards, so they probably pay less for commissions, lack strong art direction, and don't call in any favors from their vanguard artists.
Wouldn't it have made more sense to make the Velukun Dragon 4/5, and just add a straight die roll?
Bolshack dragon looks like it’s wearing sayin armor lol
it is bonkers to think they put conjure into paper cards even in an un-set card. When u conjure in MTGA you get a real copy of a card that can go to your grave & even be shuffled into your deck. Not a token. To play it right you need to own the un-set card & one copy of the cared it conjures.
if u ask me, what they should have done with rusko, I would say. Conjure a card from outside of the game called midnight clock, & put it into play, & force the player to own the card & have as part of a side board. Then make rusko Loos this text when u control midnight clock, so u can only get one.
Momir Basic was about the only Vanguard i got into, on mtgo.
At first, I thought you said "pelican dragon" lol
"Has all Card names" means you better not be playing any other Legendries without a Mirror thing or that one Sakashima in play.
EDIT or does that only work if both are Legendary? I might have messed that up...
Oh that was TEFERI as a Green Druid. I thought it was Garruk there for a moment and wondered why he cared about stopping people from casting at Instant Speed.
Yeah both have to be Legendary for it to matter. Look at Spark Double.
I can’t count how many players I’ve traumatized with rusko. He’s one of the most ridiculous commanders I’ve ever seen
yeah, im one of them. i just cant resist trying to break his stupid face. i hang ok vs him lifetime, probably 30-35% win rate with a Heliod Removal/Angel/Lifegain deck. i suspect wins are vs noob suboptimal decks. I dont see him that often lately.
Was watching anime and immediately dropped it to come over here.
Oh man, I miss when Arena meant a paper format
Gawt Dang I love hearing that intro! 😂
Faithless looting is good because of what you can discard not draw, and is banned, but control of the court isn't particularly powerful lol?
It's a random discard....
Faithless looting is good because you CHOOSE what you WANT to discard, not just random three
U can faithless looting in a lot of decks and situations with no cards in hand
@@Leevodevo irrelevant? This card is only useful in those hellbent situations. Gamble is good because the card you want to keep in your hand isn't likely to be discarded, but Control the Court means the chances are flipped. If you HAD something you wanted to keep, you don't cast Control
Lol prolly skipping this. Probably pick up a few scraps when everybody else is done with it.
I still play with Panglacial Wurm!
yugioh used to use all 4 digits of the power, but they just got rid of it, which why it deals in multiples of 100 and 1000
i hope they reprint more banding creatures, or make some new ones. (and not just banding sliver)
Dangit! I've been working on (playing around with really) my own custom Magic set for a while now (too long), and every innovation I intended to shock the world with has been stolen (they're watching me) by Wizards and made into actual Magic cards*. Now, they've got a Basic Creature in the form of Omnipresent Impostor. I assume that "(A deck may have any number of basic cards.)", which is how my Basic Creatures display their reminder text. Think about it. There's no reason why the Basic supertype can't appear on nonland cards.
You can stop reading here if you value your sanity.
* A short, off-the-top-of-my-head, and incomplete list of my "stolen" concepts include: Warlock as a new creature type, the proliferation of Clues, Treasures and Food, the return of double-faced cards outside of Innistrad, more cards like Lord Gonti that let a player 'steal' opponents' cards (and a keyword action to go with it [Heist]), batching evil-doer creature types together (I called them villains, but Pirates weren't as common when I started -- I used Minions instead), bringing back Mercenaries and expanding their color identity beyond Black, the use of the term Secret Lair (yeah, I've been at this megaproject [over a thousand cards and counting!] since before Dominaria came out), the return of hideaway, crafting an entire world around the themes of crime/criminals (they did it twice already!), creating a serious Magic set in the style of a pre-existing intellectual property (aka Universes Beyond), offering a secondary product that is closely tied to the main product (it's a four-set block, really) in the form of preconstructed decks (like the Commander decks you see today), and more.
I suppose great minds think alike, but man, does it suck not making it to print first. It makes my original designs feel derivative.
I still have some tricks up my sleeve, and I'm taking what I can from canon Magic when it fits like the way I have a counters-matter subtheme in one of the sets in the block and stun counters (and ability counters, for that matter) are a really clean way to go beyond simple +1/+1 counters.
...and sometimes the similarities are eerily specific, like Bloomburrow's cycle of "Duo" creatures with two relevant creature types sporting compound names that end in 'Duo' and describe both parts of the duo and have abilities either faction would find useful. (Okay, so that last bit only makes sense, but you know what I mean.)
And WotC continues to mine member berries.
Between test cards and acorn cards its seems like most of this set is unplayable in sanctioned magic. Far as im concerned they may as well have slapped an Un in front of Mystery. Imo this set isn't worth buying packs of. If i get anything it'll just be singles
OR the dragon missed with it's breath!
Vanguard! So nostalgic!
Bet vanguard art is sick 😎
my bones hurt when i see that set.
Does mtg ever get power crept to where the power nine are just good cards not game breaking?
For Velukan Dragon, they could have wrote "Roll a 6 six sided die. If you roll a 6, roll again."
no, that opens up the ability for infinite rolls which will probably combo with a card in the future that gives mana for every roll or pings for every roll or ventures for every roll, etc.
There are already cards printed that let you re roll dice and trigger of dice rolls. All this card needed was haste to not be unplayable.
O-kagachi is my first commander
Be even better if your average MtG player might actually be able to get these cards without playing scalper prices.
How many minds can one game lose?
How many hearts can one game stomp?
20:15 1984, anyone?
I thought you meant Card Fight Vanguard lol
welp it was fun guys. GG
I have the Urza vanguard card
i think of this die roll more on a to hit roll .. bot ethaeric
Gods I dislike these future sight frames so much
By being wotc, they can....
That's funny. I still have my bolshack dragon from back in the day
12:50 man I would love to build Rusko irl
#teammishra
For the algorithm 👍
If "Omnipresent Imposter" has all card names that means it is a "Relentless Rats" card as well so you can use more than 4 in your deck...
Card names not card text.
Isnt it impossible to have more than 4 copies of that card and the rest is lands because you cant have more than 4 copies of uniquely named cards?
Or is the wording on the deck construction around multiple copies of cards different than that?
I play a lot of card games and this type of detail can get mixed up from game to game.
@@stephenhousman6975 Add at least one actual Relentless Rats card to the deck to cover that.
Since Omnipresent Impostor has the Basic supertype, I want to think that means you can have any number of them in your deck, just like with basic lands.
@@SomeGuy712x but then you couldn't technically have any other cards? Or is the name of every card effect only active when its in play?
This is all just reprints and playtest cards, there's nothing special here. Nice title on that dude.
The face on the relentless rats is being torn off too. Oohhh, I want that; I don’t even play anymore and I want that. I remember old rat decks. 🫡