Sandeep gave savage & hard hitting reply to all these Movie & Woke critics through Animal movie & frustration & anger is easily visible in their reviews quoting Male chauvinism & Misogynist in the end for all these frustration & anger to be reduced to some xtent better buy burnol 🤣🤣
Just admire the acting skills of Ranbir. You don't need to overreact. It is just a character with good cinematography. We should accept the movie just as we accept bold females with extra woke-like characters like Four More Sorts, Bombay Begams etc.
90% of the audience didnt accept four more shots , bombay or any other femanine movies I am not saying we should accept them, feminism, musculanity....all that have a limit but four more shots crossed it , here animal also crossed it so its not "overreacting"
Nobody, not even woke feminists, like four more shots. Inappropriate displays should be called out for what they are so nobody sits there idolizing them.
The film name is Animal and it surely justified the film as Ranbir is animal in the movie , as animal he does whatever he wants by thinking/loving his family and especially for his Father
It's just a movie; avoid lecturing about what you may find challenging. Focus on praising the good scenes and analyzing the shortcomings without bias. Refrain from personal attacks or assumptions, as they detract from constructive criticism. If you dislike the film, it's okay - diverse opinions enrich discussions.
Exactly. I don't understand why movies have to be perceived through such a narrow or myopic lens, insisting that if a negative character is portrayed, they MUST be punished by the end. Movies cannot be viewed through the prism of activism; there are no rules in moviemaking or art. You can criticize art, but you can't censor it.
@@_swapnilmishra_you can still not glorify or normalise without showing repercussions. Vanga has shitty morals, it's obvious when you watch the movie and if you wanna deny, watch his interviews. People who support this for the most part too have shitty morals, that's why they idolise these characters in the first place. Nightcrawler was a movie on a sociopath without repercussions and nowhere does the director glorify that behavior. Scorsese gangster movies don't feel glorified. You are just rationalising horrible people like vanga making movies normalising horrible behavior. Our society is sick and misogynistic, movies like this and people who gaga over it are reflection of that
@@_swapnilmishra_because our children learn from the movies and in my young age I learnt so many things from movies. It’s not just a piece of entertainment but social responsibility.
Why we cannot keep a film just to theatre or in streaming platforms, why to implement it in our lives not every filmaker makes a film for motivation. Ranbir is not a hero in this film this is just a fictional story of a man who just knows violence and if anyone analyse it it's just "stupidity". But it entertain the audience the action set pices are nice and no one should take moral lessons from film. There is a reason its A-Rated because the world assumes Adults can distinguish between REAL AND REEL life. After watching all the reviews(i did not watch this video as i watched one yesterday) all the thing i am getting is people are making money through the popularity of ANIMAL and VANGA JUST TREAT IT LIKE ANOTHER FILM GUYSS PLSSS
Who goes to watch a movie to learn good things, movies are for entertainment? If you want to learn good things then you go to school and college, right? How strange are these people?🤦♀️
But that is the character. Vanga wanted Ranbir's character to be like that, a person who should be hated for his actions. It is meant to make you feel that way, isn't? It is problematic and that is specifically why the director has choose to create the scene. That is why it is named Animal otherwise it should have been named victim. The story is a story you can derive what you want to but specially the morality. There are so many problematic scenes is Kubrick's clockwork Orange but as far as I know cinephiles deem it as an masterpiece. Or any crime thriller. The point is these characters may exist in reality but they need to be presented in the way they are with their problematic moral stances and their blind love for his loved ones. The movie should be treated as a craft not your moral science class. The director was so clinical with his execution, Ranbir's best performance. A demonic presence on the screen both filled with love and rage. No one is congratulating or celebrating that. The father son bond which is common in Indian household.They did a phenomenal job. When the director makes you triggered, I personally think he was able to get inside your skin and he perfectly did what he was meant to do.
Ranbir justifies the role and title. Just like an Animal he also acts on his most basic and raw, wild instincts of Protect and Hunt. For me if we accept such cinema and let artists flow then this maybe dawn of New Wave of hindi cinema. Just like what happened in Kannada and Malyalam industries
Let me tell you one thing, there is a difference between what is portrayed and how the audience takes it. Sometimes for the sake of entertainment and enjoyment, we watch it as it is. We only learn something from it when some topics are highly explored, such as movies like Toilet Ek Prem Katha, padman, 3 Idiots, Swades, etc. these movies delve deep into the messaging and it's quite effective. But certain movies also contain some level of regressiveness that we as an audience have quite moved on from that. We know these things existed for a long time in our country, and Bollywood has shed some light on this matter in its own Bollywood way, but these topics somehow become the event of the day, whether you think it or not, it becomes a hit. Those regressive mindset people may support this, and we must bring them to the right path. The problem whether ether how much are you taking all of the things in the movie, because after waching Animal, i never felt for the character. ,because his moral values, his way of life, his way of protection knows no bounds. He's a man who is no good, no bad, nor in the between. He's something quite different, which even he doesn't know. I am just saying this because you say the cinema is just for learning. Not all cinema is learning, and making comments like these doesn't change the fact that the movie is bad. It's what you see, what you enjoy, and what y'all take from it. Don't be the character, be the character, don't judge the situation, judge the situation, it's all a choice. It all boils down to your own opinion of the film, because at the end, all the things that you talk about, whether it's misogyny, sexism, and brutality, psychology, those are the deep topics that you talk about. Y'all don't talk about how amazing the BGM was, how amazing the story was, how the acting was, how their performances were, how the action was. It all boils down to what this movies teaches us about society. We as an audience know our limits, we are progressive, and we've left behind our imaging for this movie.
Blood rampage movies always existed in West. But their audience are very matured or advance to differentiate between cinema and reality. In India it's completely different situation!!! People influenced by cinema and follow the Hero blindly.
I agree to you totally. But in the end it is the creative decision of the creator, we can like it or hate it but we can't go and say he can't show this. I think audience should consume the content the way it is presented rather than questioning the creator.
I watched this movie today and i can say this movie surely brings the name animal to justice...every scene captivates the character on point...ranbir feels more than a character infact he breathes through the character...the screenplay perfectly fits...the background thumping sound when R.K gets into action is just wow...even Anil Kapoor was on point....i guess after URI movie this was Bollywood best fruit...
Cinema paints the picture of society..... One should not bash the craft, i think Animal trailer clearly gives out what is the director's vision. Audience who are going to watch are mature enough to like or dislike it. I know it can be triggering or brutal for some small section but film as a whole delivers on point what cast and crew had in minds.... Not all movie can be samaj sudharkar kind of movie or Bollywood masala.... These kind of movie should be made and exist coherently with Bollywood masala of all Astar Bollywood actors i.e salman or Shahrukh You all need to take a chill pill and applaud the performance. Peace
That's why it's rated as "A" already which symbolises that it's not for all but for mature audience but if our Indian Society would have been so much matured then our leaders wouldn't have did nonsense acts in public.😂😂
I think one statement answers it all... And that is why does anyone as an audience judge a film on a moral scale.. Isn't one just supposed to witness or experience it with open mind..
Great articuation! Unlike other films this one for sure pricks your moralistic fibre, it polarises your views about masculinity and hence even at the cost of not agreeing with many things shown the film works!!..even after it ends...it doesnt leave your being like other films do! And that differentiates this film...I also thought here is our own Quninton Tarantino!!
well .... fortunately sandeep doesn't give a F.....abt the so called critics opinion ... the last frame of the animal movie is a Sandeep's response to u guys ..enjoy it💥
This is a really good take on the movie. Even I felt the same. I never identified with the hero. I felt he was a disgusting character with some charisma. Also i felt the father-son bond really didnt make much of an emotional impact as i imagined it should have. The 2nd half seems like sandeep reddy vanga got too indulgent
Echo with your thought to the T. Should have spent a lot more time exploring the dad son relationship and not so many shifts in the timeline. Some of the commentary with regards to women was not necessary at all
Answer to your query is very simple.. do you need more context to understand why you love your parents? Well you dont need reasons to love .. already RanVijay already said this in the film.. take it or leave it.. no need for father son senti...especially when we dont need to rationalize why he is for what he is .. he is just a maniac.. that's all there it to that character.
@@adi_1o1 it's not about context it's more about the impact. It didn't have the emotional impact for me as a viewer maybe it did for you. Everyone is entitled to their own opinions . This is what I felt. Now you might disagree with me that's totally fine👍
This review is one of the best ones I saw. I suppose you can like this film, but the problem starts when one starts to celebrate the actions showcased in this film. And there is an entire army out there which is actually doing the same. The one thing I absolutely deplore is the fact that this movie has given undue agency to many regressive mindsets in our society, who are using the noise to drown the genuine issues.
Thanks a lot for the comment bud! 😁Yes, the idea is to have a deeper conversation about cinema and its impact, without getting into binaries of likes and dislikes.
The main character played by Ranbir Kapoor 1. Chokes a Man to Death 2. Chops 100 men with Axe 3. Shoots 100 men with Machine gun 4. Slits a Man's throat in the Climax But the movie is Misogynistic 😅
He's just commenting on how crude the Indian masses are cheering for disturbing nasty stuff which is very much true. It's about the takeaway of film not abt the review.
Hi Prateek, Have seen a few reviews based on my curiosity towards the movie Animal. I usually prefer Sucharita Tyagi’s reviews but your episode too has a different take on the opinion of Animal. Admits the stark positivity or negativity of the film I would like to put across a point which most tend to miss. What is a Film? What is Cinema or a Cinematic universe? What is the difference between cinema & a documentary ? Every movie has a positive and a negative reactive meter from the world viewers. I believe that we live in a real world. When one thinks of going to a cinema, it’s for entertainment. Cinema is story telling. Cinema is embracing the visual craft, Cinema is about the craft of each and every individual associated with the movie. Cinema is an exhilarating experience. Cinema is a crafts makers ode to his fans and audiences, it’s an art on visual display; the Depiction of art is an intellectual, emotional or just a mere visual perspective of each respective viewer. It could be a bad film, it could be a good film, the morality could be questioned or accepted; but why not dwell on the craft. Audiences going in know consciously that they are going in for a visual experience which has no connect with real life. Then there are audiences who aren’t mature enough; who intentionally blur the cinematic and real world. Each to his own/ her own. There are countless films in the world which depict even higher intense levels of rage, anger, emotion, violence, masculinity, misogyny, etc etc. then there are films which depict love, warmth, bonding, sensuality, etc We know it’s a craft Why not break down the craft? Rather than breaking down the reactions of the people seeing the craft? The performances of Ranbir, Anil sir, Bobby, Rashmika, The emotions they displayed was it intense, was it versatile? What was the transformation the characters went through and the work they put into their craft? How right was the background score, the music? Was it impactful to the story telling? How was the make up? Through the movie? What was the idea behind the makers mind to have those men with helmets in the action sequences? Why was it effective as per the makers? The set design? Was it apt? What were the shortcomings there ? The sound and dubbing and dialogue delivery ? Could that have been better? The cinematography, the lighting, the action choreography? How difficult was it to shoot the action sequences? The technicalities of editing such a film? A review of a film is not your opinion of the film. An opinion is for a fan or critic. A review is an expression and assessment of the craftsmanship who’s layed out the craft for you. When you see a painting, everyone has their opinion which is fair and square. It’s good, It’s bad, It’s too bold, It’s too colourful, It’s too dark, Etc etc … But What is the canvas? What kind of paints were used? What is the art of brushstrokes used by the artist? The depth of the tones created? Why did he use a specific shade or a particular thick canvas? What was the thought in the mind of the creator while making the art? I believe the right questions make the right review and not the right or wrong Opinions.
Firstly its Adult certified movie, which means if a person understand complete what is good and bad. 2. This is the greatest educational movie to teach what u should not do. And if movies influence is that powerful then people should have joined army after watching Sam bahadur. And all have cracked iit after watching super 30. But the biggest issue is that school books are providing half truth history and glorifying the wrong dower that complete acceptable but a movie who stated from the beginning that its brutal, only for adults from that movie they want to see a good moral. For all those people u guys are the mantri of that monkey story.😂😂😂
I loved Animal. Like you, I was charmed by Arjun Reddy, couldn't get through Kabir Singh (synthetic Shahid!). At the end of the day, Vanga movies are emotionally honest and authentic. As a woman, do I identify with all the lead man's actions...no. But I cannot fathom the position that all feminists must hate his movies. Feminists are also emotionally authentic....and that part of them will connect to Vanga movies. As a woman, what i learn from Vanga movies is that young women should not jump into relationships till they are complete in themselves, and should not have to grow up with immature men:)
I myself can give honest remarks about some scenes in movie which were not necessary at all. But given that Ranvijay (Ranbir Singh) still was with his wife, kids and yes, his father, all brothers he deployed from village and also asking for forgiveness from Brah or brar whatever in ending fight scene. Movie really is a masterpiece and pinnacle of any action or gore violence ever produced in Indian cinema. All action scenes, dialogues, especially upbeat music makes it so enticing god knows what people experienced in theatre if someone watched that scene where 'Ranvijay killed all those men with masks single-handedly and starting of song and shouting meaningful lyrics. There's never been a movie like this before in Bollywood. Just one simple suggestion don't try to watch this family unless you radically open minded or of westernised thought. May be you can watch action but when it comes to dialogues and body language its something you never want to see with elders. With that said everyone should watch these movie because it simply a experience which was never created in Indian movies. May be down the line 5-10 years we can expect movies like memories of murders, parasites, old boy, raid 2 especially for action here too.
totally agree with you brother , this movie was a goddamn experience , very few times we see the tangent going in different direction in so called "big indian commercial" movies from the same garbage that we make , rajamouli is one of the few gems who does this , and now vanga , man you cant tell that this is this mans second movie as a director , the direction , the screenplay , the editing , and the superb acting , the unapologetic vision was unparalled . And if a person is just that dumb that he or she just can't enjoy this just as movie like a mature person than what to say , indian audience has always being dumb but the least they can do is see the uniqueness and the balls of the actor and the director to present such thing in the biggest way possible or people can just sit and complain why we dont make unique things and take a break from the same garbage that india produces.
@@watchhere6200 GOW ka pata nahi but bhai Saw, Texas Chainsaw massacre, halloween, spit on your grave etc bahot movies dekhi hai but Jin logo so animal movie ka violence wala part handle nahi ho Raha woh shayad kabhi proper gore ya splatter movies dekhe hi na jaise human centipede. Baat main animal movie ki kar raha tha apni watchlist ki nahi. Thoda toh context toh dekh lo, ek word ko leke pure comment ka hi intention badal diya.
These people won’t bash a movie if it was directed and produced by top directors in Hollywood. A cinema can tell a story of anything! If you have a problem with then you should avoid it… even if you don’t like it then say movie is not good. What movie represents is what movie is meant to represent!
Perfect ans He's just making this video for views It's just a movie that's it . If you thank a movie story seriously in your life then the problem is in you And my question is what does he know about movies , he makes video about politics and suddenly he's reviewing a movie ( that's unexpected ) Does he know the story behind the movie that people criticize for making movie like he want . That's why he made this movie At the end you are a fool if you think a movie is how people want to portray their story ( the meaning of film )
This is the best analysis of the problems with Animal movie that i have heard so far. Yes, an artist has the right to express themselves the way they want to, but it’s the the reaction of the masses, that makes this Movie scary. And the man who made it, who is catering to the people with same warped mentality as his own. It scares girls and women like me that this world is not a safe place to live. May be You are right. As women we are stupid to think that in the last 15-20 years, the new generation of men have evolved. What bothers me the most is that Sandeep Reddy Vanga how confidently declared that there is no need for change. That’s how humans should be.
Ohhh!! Thank God!! I saw your review. Have been searching for a review like this that's not plain black or white, to talk about the craft but also point out the consequences of the film on the audience. And everything you said makes absolute sense. A film like this that's high on craft but pushes the moral envelope needs the nuanced expression. And you're the only reviewer by far that has put up with so much in depth analysis. Thank you for the review.
Extremely few boy friends would behave violently with their girl friends like Arjun Reddy behaves with Preethi. Yet, Arjun Reddy is a good film coz it is high on entertainment quotient, and also has sound logic in the plot. Critics should not mix up a movie and real life
@@praneelgottipati7301few points... (1) Arjun hits Preethi. Preethi also hits Arjun in climax. Yet, I agree boy hitting girl is avoidable due to girl's lesser PHYSICAL strength (2) Body exists not to hit. All organs do their duties so to produce energy for mind to function. Thus body is a servant of the mind, primarily. So, if one sees logically, hitting a body is UNINTELLIGENCE (3) Ranvijay (in Animal) going into class room while shooting his machine gun can not INFLUENCE coz none have access to a mc gun. But guys may get inflluenced with hero's violent mind, and become violent themselves. Arjun's vulgar language, physical violence in Arjun Reddy can influence guys a lot as they directly RELATE their lives with hero's lives (4) Yet, movies are 1 way a guy gets influenced. The guy has been under continuous influence from society ever since he became conscious. A guy picks negatives quite quickly from internet (on mobile or tablet or laptop) or news tv channels os talks with friends and so on. So movies is just 1 among many. (5) Definition of democracy -> No restriction to a human mind's thought, but restriction exists to a human's actions. If actions violate the legal laws, will be punished. Movie is an expression of the director's thoughts. Hence 100% legal (6) There is more violence in books than movies coz everything can not be easily converted into audio-visual format. Yet, movies are considered as more capable of influencing due to the visual format (7) Movie is a creative field. If a director is worried about movie's influence on public, he can not be creative. Already there are extremely limited number of stories all over the world. If story telling is also restricted, it prevents the expression of director's creativity. I believe movie should be allowed to be completely creative and drop censor board also because there is no censor to movies on internet (OTTs, etc) (8) If a guy is negatively influenced by movies, that's his problem. Different people get differently influenced. Depends on the intellectual strength of the guy. Country's legal rules take care of misbehaving guys. Eventually, it's up to a guy how he wants to live. All kinds of people exist in society with or without movies. (9) If a girl in the society is facing the negative side of movie's influence on a guy, the girl can use her analytical skills to make wiser decisions. Else, up to her fate.
THE VERY THOUGHT THAT THE MAIN LEAD SHOULD HAVE A SQUEAKY CLEAN "HERO" IMAGE IS OLD SCHOOL. NOWHERE IN THE MOVIE IS IT SHOWN THAT THE MAN IS PERFECT. THE CHARACTER IS JUST A HUMAN, WITH SHADES OF GREY, OBSESSED WITH HIS DAD THAT HE WOULD GO ANY EXTENT TO PROTECT HIM. NOW ABOUT THE MISOGYNY AND VIOLENCE MENTIONED. I AM SURE THE VERY SAME CRITICS WHO LOOK UPTO MOVIES LIKE THE GODFATHER, SCARFACE, GOODFELLAS, AMERICAN PSYCHO, KILL BILL, TAXI DRIVER, PULP FICTION AND THE LIKE FOR THEIR ART (WHICH BY THE WAY, HAS ELEMENTS OF EXTREME MISOGYNY/VIOLENCE) LOOK DOWN ON MOVIES LIKE ANIMAL OR KABIR SINGH. STATING THAT THE CHARACTER PLAYED BY BOBBY DEOL RAPES AND ABUSES WOMEN IS AS GOOD AS SAYING, "OH MY! THE JOKER HAS MASSACRED SO MANY PEOPLE! HOW DARE HE!" ANOTHER ONE OF THESE DOUBLE STANDARDS WAS SEEN WHEN PEOPLE SAY THE MAIN LEAD DISRESPECTS A WOMAN BY PULLING THE BRA STRAP AND ASKING ANOTHER TO LICK HIS SHOE. IT'S AS SILLY AS ME SAYING, "OH MY! I AM SO OFFENDED THAT THE CHARACTER WISHED HER DAD-IN-LAW DIDN'T SURVIVE THE GUN SHOT. I AM SO AGGRIEVED THAT THE WOMAN WHO MADE LOVE WITH THE PROTAGONIST TURNED OUT TO BE A MOLE!" LIKE ANY MOVIE, THESE ARE PLOTS WITH LAYERED CHARACTERS. A MOVIE, UNLIKE A SPEECH, NEED NOT DELIVER A UNIVERSAL MESSAGE. THAT'S WHY MOVIES HAVE RATINGS, WHICH IS STILL NEW IN INDIAN CINEMA.
Excellent review. Just immature audience in the comment section jo bas timepass ke liye movie dekhte na ki art ke liye. Agar artko samjhenge tho pata chaltha kitna ghatiya film banaya gya hai socially, technically and emotionally. He badly needs a therapist that SRV
@@devv9051 art film separate nhi hotha bhai. Film making hi ek art hain. Wahi mve utna hi gore aur violence ke saath badi achi se banaya jaa saktha tha, aur bane bhi hai vaise. Lekin uss Vanga ko film karna aatha hi nhi. Bass attitude dikhana aatha hai.
Let the film be just films dont fall for reviews you know well what it is offering go for it if you want, dont go if you dont watch violence. It's not a bad film at all. These are just so called woke critics.
Exactly! True. First of all there is nothing called "woke critics". These are not Critics at all but the other groups of Boycott Gangs in disguise of Critics.
As a person who hasn't watched this triggering ,neo noir movie , it is so satisfying to see these english chattering and extremely marxist people having emotional outburst
you have clearly laid out my own thoughts about this film honestly. every opinion i had of this movie was just said by you. one thing i would add though is that my biggest complaint of this film was quite simply that it doesn't actually know what it wants to be. at times it wants to be a personal family drama., at times a gritty revenge thriller, at times a masala action film, and overall the messaging of the film feels very torn and not in the best way. i have zero issues with a violent film. i have zero issues with a violent film with skewed morality . i have an issue with a film that wants to feel gritty and dark and brutal but not being able to escape the curse of bollywoodization.
"Should not like". Well, people on the internet are now defining what we "should like" and "shouldn't like". I don't understand why can't people perceive a movie as a movie!? It's just a movie dam't and it''s okay if I or anybody else likes it! Don't like it, don't have to ask anybody to watch it, but please stop imposing your standards, ideals and political correctness on people and expecting them to conform. Yes, a movie does have an influence but not as much as the wokes are claiming, there are several other evils undermining the society which need to be paid attention to rather than going batshit crazy over a movie's portrayal of something in a certain way. It's just a form of entertainment!
Apka wo point.. Ke scarface nd gangsow jaise movies me banda end me apne actions ke liye pay karta hai. But yaha ego massage ki feel hai. That is an important point. Makes me think
This movie was made to offend people that's why its rated adult,i personally think movie was good ,if you don't see all the characters as heroes because they are shown as animals with wild nature.
Thanks for this video. It perfectly reflected my thoughts. I was only seeing videos of either side of the like/hate spectrum, and this movie needs a more nuanced analysis like this
Thank you😊 I'm actually confused whether I like the film or not. But I definitely don't hate it. If a film can extract such a deep response from you, I think there's merit to that..
Why do artist need to take a moralist stand bro..? Why not a bad film can teach good things..? Movies are not religious scriptures to teach good and pls don't expect righteousness from movies
It's good that some amount of people are offended by this movie, it'll do more negative publicity & as a result a new kind of cinema will take birth in India. 20-30 years later filmmakers will praise Vanga to be daring enough to have made this movie in 2023
Can anyone say Sandeep Vanga stop repeating same story line and cast and try to make a same movie with violent alpha female character? Its then we will see how good he is a director??? And for God's sake in Gangs of Wasseypur all the female characters were strong to a level and not mere soft puppets.
Why would anyone go so deep, it' s just a craft enacted beautifully by brilliant actors, it is same as great women potray different beautiful roles on the screen. Come on, Sandeep created a great movie yet again, if someone doesn't like it , dnt watch it brother/sister, but just don't pull someone down for what they created, I am a woman but I am not offended about how he has potrayed men & women in the movies, it is just 3 hour dramatic movie. It's how one percieves the content, none can sit and judge Tom n Jerry and make sense out of it. I think we all need to try to find sense in our own lives rather than sitting and judging around. I had fun, songs are beautiful and all the actors did a good job!! Peace out & stay blessed😊😊🙏🙏
Every film maker pushes their own belief system through their films. Its upto you how much attention will you give to it, recently sanju shows Sanjay Dutt as a victim. I dont beleive that fact, but I enjoyed the movie because of the engaging screenplay, the acting, the presentation etc. Similarly, in animal I found the screenplay weak, but the presentation of Ranbir, his performance, Background score, music was brilliant. Why do we have to buy the politics of the movie to our soul to enjoy it. Every movie will not move you from your core, that's rare. This is a mainstream bollywood movie,grab popcorn and enjoy. If you arent, simply dont watch. Creating controversy will only result more eyeballs on the movie.
Its not about being anti this or anti that… just simple is that movie was not good enough or overhyped. I don’t expect to learn anything from a movie but want to be entertained. This movie feels good coz performances are good but story wise its a drag!
I think being such a diverse country we cannot counsel upon the morality point of view while watching entertainment content, by the same logic young girls shouldn't be watching 'Four More Shots' cause its so wrong on so many levels but here we are that show has 3 seasons cause people (majorly girls) watch it, do it leave an impression on them? Yes!, is it scary to think about? Yes!
I think you're over exaggerating he can't even slap his wife but can kill hundreds of men he says to his sister's to be independent and asks them to choose their husbands independently
Having uplifting soundtrack, showing stylized visuals, having the main character show no remorse or even being proud of the behaviour . Some ways to make audience support the character.
@@finddeepali 1. Having uplifting soundtrack? Every movies has some kind of bgm for protagonist or antagonist which liked by audience according to their taste, don't know how it relate to celebrate ing wrong deeds of thay character 2. Stylish visuals? 😂 Again every movie has different types of stylish visuals even for villain, people liking it doesn't necessarily mean that they support the wrong doings of the charector 3. Also charector showing no remorse of what he had done thats why movie name is animal
Ironically Vanga is woke. Shocked? I mean, he is exactly like them. Both are loud, narcissist, playing the victim , incapable of hearing critisim. Just shut up and listen to them. Also the love for self-insert main character. The one thing I absolutely hate in a story bcs it becomes what the writer believes and not a contrasting tale of different characters. The day I saw his Anupam interview after KS. I knew exactly he isn't making a movie. He is creating a fan fiction where he is the self-insert lead, who does all problematic things without any care. I mean, it's his world ,so ofcourse he can do anything. Who gonna oppose him in his story? That is why he has so much trouble in accepting critisim. Bcs he sees it's an attack on him and not a character he created. His character never admits he is wrong bcs Vanga can never be wrong. I am sure in upcoming interviews we will find out he has same relationship with his father like in Animal. The man is trying to cop by making movies and seeking gratification for his toxic mentality. He needs therapy, seriously. Anurag Kashyap has far better understanding of writing and world building than Vanga does. Kashyap writes stories with layers , nuances and explores different characters and perspectives. Whereas, Vanga does is - him in romantic story. Him in revange drama. It always about him. Do you think Vanga will ever make Ugly like movie?
Do I personally care about what critics have to say ? Absolutely not. But as an concerned citizen I am definitely not encouraging teens to watch it. One has to have a clear maturity, the ability to make a boundary between reel and real life before watching it.
No I dont think he failed. I think as a Filmmaker he has opened dialogue to address the issue of people like the ones sitting behind you in the theater who reacted nonchalantly at the marital rape scene. It is clear that Vanga knew what he was trying to achieve on film.
To all the critics, if you see the story of animal and the Godfather is similar where a son becomes a gangster and kills everyone who attacked his father. But the Godfather has very good rating and is praised where animal is criticised to be too violent. Yes there could be better story writing and direction in case of animal but in areas if acting and cinematography it has done great job. To the people who are telling it is misogynistic, Rashmika did left Ranbir at last. I think it says all. What I and Prateek wants to say is every film teaches something, it depends on you how you interpret it.
God just don’t forget this takes place in it’s own class mafia world and his dad was under constant threat!! Protagonist is a unique character… deal with it…. it is heroic too coz he overcame the danger (atleast part of it)
RGV and Vanga are 2 directors who have dismantled the stereotype movies. A hero may be masculine enough to save his family at the same time succumb for the love of his only hero. Secondly the brotherhood the way social construct worked ,the way he reaches out to his cousins is something to take as a learning. The conviction he wants from his wife is all that a man needs to achieve and sail through tides. The character of Rannvijay doesnt ask you to losen your pants or cheat rather explains that how " the man " is vulenerable infront of a woman. I had prejudices about the movie.Went to watch Ranbir & for the sake of director Vanga.Well crafted movie. what I remembered when Ranbir slit the throat is 2 things - the last offer of Krishna to give 5 villages to avoid Mahabharta and the way ISIS slit the throats . Lastly , wokes ki L laga di Sanddep Vanga ne
As long as you misunderstand the entire satire surrounding the maximalism and alpha-masculinity of all that Animal is and where all these comes from and actions which are subsequently relevant in the context of the character that RK play and how craftfully Vanga plays with your perception of the character that he intended to be hated in the first place, it would always be a poke on your butt that's synthetically liberal and poutingly touchy.
Critic/Reviewer can see a movie in 2 ways : (1) What if there exists some where in society a guy like the protagonist of the movie! (2) What if none exists in society like the movie's protagonist, and the protagonist is completely a fictional character in a fictional story created by the director You should allow for such possibilities, instead of judging a movie as misogynistic or violent or something else. It is an adult film. That's all. Meaningless to call a FICTIONAL movie misogynistic (or some other movie misandristic) No?
What was your reaction after watching Ranbir Kapoor and Sandeep Reddy Vanga's 'Animal?' Tell us in the comments below!👇🏽
@Sandeep Reddy vanga needs therapy
Sandeep gave savage & hard hitting reply to all these Movie & Woke critics through Animal movie & frustration & anger is easily visible in their reviews quoting Male chauvinism & Misogynist in the end for all these frustration & anger to be reduced to some xtent better buy burnol 🤣🤣
Superhit
Basically vanga needs some psycho therapy
Sometimes the film reminds me the Korean psychological thriller " I saw the devil" for some violent scenes...overall it is a good movie
Just admire the acting skills of Ranbir. You don't need to overreact. It is just a character with good cinematography. We should accept the movie just as we accept bold females with extra woke-like characters like Four More Sorts, Bombay Begams etc.
90% of the audience didnt accept four more shots , bombay or any other femanine movies I am not saying we should accept them, feminism, musculanity....all that have a limit but four more shots crossed it , here animal also crossed it so its not "overreacting"
10/10
Nobody, not even woke feminists, like four more shots. Inappropriate displays should be called out for what they are so nobody sits there idolizing them.
It's not about the character but about illiterate audiences who will take these character traits into their lives and behave like hooligans
You don't have to accept movies that cross your moral lines.
The film name is Animal and it surely justified the film as Ranbir is animal in the movie , as animal he does whatever he wants by thinking/loving his family and especially for his Father
When it was announced, I thought it would be Werewolf movie.
Insaani darindaa 😅
It's just a movie; avoid lecturing about what you may find challenging. Focus on praising the good scenes and analyzing the shortcomings without bias. Refrain from personal attacks or assumptions, as they detract from constructive criticism. If you dislike the film, it's okay - diverse opinions enrich discussions.
Exactly. I don't understand why movies have to be perceived through such a narrow or myopic lens, insisting that if a negative character is portrayed, they MUST be punished by the end. Movies cannot be viewed through the prism of activism; there are no rules in moviemaking or art. You can criticize art, but you can't censor it.
@@_swapnilmishra_you can still not glorify or normalise without showing repercussions. Vanga has shitty morals, it's obvious when you watch the movie and if you wanna deny, watch his interviews. People who support this for the most part too have shitty morals, that's why they idolise these characters in the first place.
Nightcrawler was a movie on a sociopath without repercussions and nowhere does the director glorify that behavior. Scorsese gangster movies don't feel glorified.
You are just rationalising horrible people like vanga making movies normalising horrible behavior. Our society is sick and misogynistic, movies like this and people who gaga over it are reflection of that
@@justforfunlol2258 If directors started to listen to people like you, they would only be able to make movies based on moral science textbooks.
@@_swapnilmishra_because our children learn from the movies and in my young age I learnt so many things from movies. It’s not just a piece of entertainment but social responsibility.
@@ramneetkaur4246 then go make movies based on moral science textbooks only
Why we cannot keep a film just to theatre or in streaming platforms, why to implement it in our lives not every filmaker makes a film for motivation. Ranbir is not a hero in this film this is just a fictional story of a man who just knows violence and if anyone analyse it it's just "stupidity". But it entertain the audience the action set pices are nice and no one should take moral lessons from film. There is a reason its A-Rated because the world assumes Adults can distinguish between REAL AND REEL life. After watching all the reviews(i did not watch this video as i watched one yesterday) all the thing i am getting is people are making money through the popularity of ANIMAL and VANGA JUST TREAT IT LIKE ANOTHER FILM GUYSS PLSSS
Do whatever you want, ANIMAL is still gonna break records!💀
You didn’t get his point. Let it be.. You enjoy
@@anikachattopadhyay4456 we don't want to even. We are interested in money and records.
@@ft.rishavlike you get one single penny from it?
@@ft.rishav that shows your mentality and which way you people are heading towards.
I rest my case.
@@ft.rishav am sorry ? so ur flexing SOMEONE else's money and records?
Who goes to watch a movie to learn good things, movies are for entertainment? If you want to learn good things then you go to school and college, right? How strange are these people?🤦♀️
💯💯
How can someone get entertained by looking at mass murders and bad treatment towards women. What is so fun in that?
💯💯💯
But that is the character. Vanga wanted Ranbir's character to be like that, a person who should be hated for his actions. It is meant to make you feel that way, isn't? It is problematic and that is specifically why the director has choose to create the scene. That is why it is named Animal otherwise it should have been named victim. The story is a story you can derive what you want to but specially the morality. There are so many problematic scenes is Kubrick's clockwork Orange but as far as I know cinephiles deem it as an masterpiece. Or any crime thriller. The point is these characters may exist in reality but they need to be presented in the way they are with their problematic moral stances and their blind love for his loved ones. The movie should be treated as a craft not your moral science class. The director was so clinical with his execution, Ranbir's best performance. A demonic presence on the screen both filled with love and rage. No one is congratulating or celebrating that. The father son bond which is common in Indian household.They did a phenomenal job. When the director makes you triggered, I personally think he was able to get inside your skin and he perfectly did what he was meant to do.
Ranbir justifies the role and title. Just like an Animal he also acts on his most basic and raw, wild instincts of Protect and Hunt. For me if we accept such cinema and let artists flow then this maybe dawn of New Wave of hindi cinema. Just like what happened in Kannada and Malyalam industries
New Wave in Kannada?
I have become fan of Sandeep after this movie he brings every emotion in its extreme form that's wht most people can't digest it
Let me tell you one thing, there is a difference between what is portrayed and how the audience takes it. Sometimes for the sake of entertainment and enjoyment, we watch it as it is. We only learn something from it when some topics are highly explored, such as movies like Toilet Ek Prem Katha, padman, 3 Idiots, Swades, etc. these movies delve deep into the messaging and it's quite effective. But certain movies also contain some level of regressiveness that we as an audience have quite moved on from that. We know these things existed for a long time in our country, and Bollywood has shed some light on this matter in its own Bollywood way, but these topics somehow become the event of the day, whether you think it or not, it becomes a hit. Those regressive mindset people may support this, and we must bring them to the right path. The problem whether ether how much are you taking all of the things in the movie, because after waching Animal, i never felt for the character. ,because his moral values, his way of life, his way of protection knows no bounds. He's a man who is no good, no bad, nor in the between. He's something quite different, which even he doesn't know. I am just saying this because you say the cinema is just for learning. Not all cinema is learning, and making comments like these doesn't change the fact that the movie is bad. It's what you see, what you enjoy, and what y'all take from it. Don't be the character, be the character, don't judge the situation, judge the situation, it's all a choice. It all boils down to your own opinion of the film, because at the end, all the things that you talk about, whether it's misogyny, sexism, and brutality, psychology, those are the deep topics that you talk about. Y'all don't talk about how amazing the BGM was, how amazing the story was, how the acting was, how their performances were, how the action was. It all boils down to what this movies teaches us about society. We as an audience know our limits, we are progressive, and we've left behind our imaging for this movie.
Blood rampage movies always existed in West. But their audience are very matured or advance to differentiate between cinema and reality. In India it's completely different situation!!! People influenced by cinema and follow the Hero blindly.
Chup
It's not about the character but about illiterate audiences who will take these character traits into their lives and behave like hooligans
I agree to you totally. But in the end it is the creative decision of the creator, we can like it or hate it but we can't go and say he can't show this. I think audience should consume the content the way it is presented rather than questioning the creator.
I watched this movie today and i can say this movie surely brings the name animal to justice...every scene captivates the character on point...ranbir feels more than a character infact he breathes through the character...the screenplay perfectly fits...the background thumping sound when R.K gets into action is just wow...even Anil Kapoor was on point....i guess after URI movie this was Bollywood best fruit...
Cinema paints the picture of society..... One should not bash the craft, i think
Animal trailer clearly gives out what is the director's vision. Audience who are going to watch are mature enough to like or dislike it.
I know it can be triggering or brutal for some small section but film as a whole delivers on point what cast and crew had in minds....
Not all movie can be samaj sudharkar kind of movie or Bollywood masala....
These kind of movie should be made and exist coherently with Bollywood masala of all Astar Bollywood actors i.e salman or Shahrukh
You all need to take a chill pill and applaud the performance.
Peace
That's why it's rated as "A" already which symbolises that it's not for all but for mature audience but if our Indian Society would have been so much matured then our leaders wouldn't have did nonsense acts in public.😂😂
Chill Pill😂😂😂😂
These critics are busy showcasing how morally superior they are to the rest of the plebs. Easy to rule over people that way.
I think one statement answers it all... And that is why does anyone as an audience judge a film on a moral scale.. Isn't one just supposed to witness or experience it with open mind..
It's - "The Quint" Review, so people won't expect much logic from Quint people.
Great articuation! Unlike other films this one for sure pricks your moralistic fibre, it polarises your views about masculinity and hence even at the cost of not agreeing with many things shown the film works!!..even after it ends...it doesnt leave your being like other films do! And that differentiates this film...I also thought here is our own Quninton Tarantino!!
well .... fortunately sandeep doesn't give a F.....abt the so called critics opinion ... the last frame of the animal movie is a Sandeep's response to u guys ..enjoy it💥
True🔥💯😂👍
With the response he is getting, SRV is going to enter into even darker zone 😂
@@amitav9681 I hope he does….a artist should never be afraid to express
What are we achieving by going into dark zone? Is it making anyone's life better
@@atukurumanoj5873 True👍👍
This is a really good take on the movie. Even I felt the same. I never identified with the hero. I felt he was a disgusting character with some charisma. Also i felt the father-son bond really didnt make much of an emotional impact as i imagined it should have. The 2nd half seems like sandeep reddy vanga got too indulgent
Echo with your thought to the T. Should have spent a lot more time exploring the dad son relationship and not so many shifts in the timeline. Some of the commentary with regards to women was not necessary at all
Answer to your query is very simple.. do you need more context to understand why you love your parents?
Well you dont need reasons to love .. already RanVijay already said this in the film.. take it or leave it.. no need for father son senti...especially when we dont need to rationalize why he is for what he is .. he is just a maniac.. that's all there it to that character.
@@adi_1o1 it's not about context it's more about the impact. It didn't have the emotional impact for me as a viewer maybe it did for you. Everyone is entitled to their own opinions . This is what I felt. Now you might disagree with me that's totally fine👍
Now I will watch Animal 10times more.
Exactly!👍🔥💯
Ticket ke paise hain
This review is one of the best ones I saw. I suppose you can like this film, but the problem starts when one starts to celebrate the actions showcased in this film. And there is an entire army out there which is actually doing the same. The one thing I absolutely deplore is the fact that this movie has given undue agency to many regressive mindsets in our society, who are using the noise to drown the genuine issues.
Thanks a lot for the comment bud! 😁Yes, the idea is to have a deeper conversation about cinema and its impact, without getting into binaries of likes and dislikes.
Tum jaise Chomu logo kai Liye director nai ek Line pehle Hi bol di Thi...😂😂
@@mrkeshav736 kya bata bhai ?
@@mrkeshav736bandar wali 😂
Well written :):)
The main character played by Ranbir Kapoor
1. Chokes a Man to Death
2. Chops 100 men with Axe
3. Shoots 100 men with Machine gun
4. Slits a Man's throat in the Climax
But the movie is Misogynistic 😅
Exactly what dumb logic 😂😂😂
Quint taking moral high ground and lecturing people...a tale as old as time
He's just commenting on how crude the Indian masses are cheering for disturbing nasty stuff which is very much true. It's about the takeaway of film not abt the review.
@@castafioreomg half of the video is just these guys moral policing and telling people what to watch.
Hi Prateek,
Have seen a few reviews based on my curiosity towards the movie Animal. I usually prefer Sucharita Tyagi’s reviews but your episode too has a different take on the opinion of Animal.
Admits the stark positivity or negativity of the film I would like to put across a point which most tend to miss.
What is a Film?
What is Cinema or a Cinematic universe?
What is the difference between cinema & a documentary ?
Every movie has a positive and a negative reactive meter from the world viewers.
I believe that we live in a real world. When one thinks of going to a cinema, it’s for entertainment.
Cinema is story telling.
Cinema is embracing the visual craft,
Cinema is about the craft of each and every individual associated with the movie.
Cinema is an exhilarating experience.
Cinema is a crafts makers ode to his fans and audiences, it’s an art on visual display; the Depiction of art is an intellectual, emotional or just a mere visual perspective of each respective viewer.
It could be a bad film, it could be a good film, the morality could be questioned or accepted; but why not dwell on the craft.
Audiences going in know consciously that they are going in for a visual experience which has no connect with real life.
Then there are audiences who aren’t mature enough; who intentionally blur the cinematic and real world.
Each to his own/ her own.
There are countless films in the world which depict even higher intense levels of rage, anger, emotion, violence, masculinity, misogyny, etc etc.
then there are films which depict love, warmth, bonding, sensuality, etc
We know it’s a craft
Why not break down the craft?
Rather than breaking down the reactions of the people seeing the craft?
The performances of
Ranbir, Anil sir, Bobby, Rashmika,
The emotions they displayed was it intense, was it versatile? What was the transformation the characters went through and the work they put into their craft?
How right was the background score, the music? Was it impactful to the story telling?
How was the make up? Through the movie?
What was the idea behind the makers mind to have those men with helmets in the action sequences? Why was it effective as per the makers?
The set design? Was it apt? What were the shortcomings there ?
The sound and dubbing and dialogue delivery ? Could that have been better?
The cinematography, the lighting, the action choreography? How difficult was it to shoot the action sequences?
The technicalities of editing such a film?
A review of a film is not your opinion of the film. An opinion is for a fan or critic.
A review is an expression and assessment of the craftsmanship who’s layed out the craft for you.
When you see a painting, everyone has their opinion which is fair and square.
It’s good,
It’s bad,
It’s too bold,
It’s too colourful,
It’s too dark,
Etc etc …
But
What is the canvas?
What kind of paints were used?
What is the art of brushstrokes used by the artist?
The depth of the tones created?
Why did he use a specific shade or a particular thick canvas?
What was the thought in the mind of the creator while making the art?
I believe the right questions make the right review and not the right or wrong Opinions.
Shush. He is busy showcasing how morally superior he is to rest of others.
Exactly
@@CosmicGoat-d3o not morally superior but how uneducated audiences incorporate bad traits from movies into their own lives
This comment section passed the vibe check 👏👏👏
Who is this Meetha Guy ? Obviously he won't like this movie ....what you expect??
Sahi kaha
😂😂😂😂😂
Firstly its Adult certified movie, which means if a person understand complete what is good and bad. 2. This is the greatest educational movie to teach what u should not do. And if movies influence is that powerful then people should have joined army after watching Sam bahadur. And all have cracked iit after watching super 30.
But the biggest issue is that school books are providing half truth history and glorifying the wrong dower that complete acceptable but a movie who stated from the beginning that its brutal, only for adults from that movie they want to see a good moral. For all those people u guys are the mantri of that monkey story.😂😂😂
The best 👌 critics are the Audience .They will decide?
😂😂😂😂 I loved their review of Purana Mandir
I loved Animal. Like you, I was charmed by Arjun Reddy, couldn't get through Kabir Singh (synthetic Shahid!). At the end of the day, Vanga movies are emotionally honest and authentic. As a woman, do I identify with all the lead man's actions...no. But I cannot fathom the position that all feminists must hate his movies. Feminists are also emotionally authentic....and that part of them will connect to Vanga movies. As a woman, what i learn from Vanga movies is that young women should not jump into relationships till they are complete in themselves, and should not have to grow up with immature men:)
This video is exactly as my thoughts.
I myself can give honest remarks about some scenes in movie which were not necessary at all.
But given that Ranvijay (Ranbir Singh) still was with his wife, kids and yes, his father, all brothers he deployed from village and also asking for forgiveness from Brah or brar whatever in ending fight scene.
Movie really is a masterpiece and pinnacle of any action or gore violence ever produced in Indian cinema.
All action scenes, dialogues, especially upbeat music makes it so enticing god knows what people experienced in theatre if someone watched that scene where 'Ranvijay killed all those men with masks single-handedly and starting of song and shouting meaningful lyrics.
There's never been a movie like this before in Bollywood.
Just one simple suggestion don't try to watch this family unless you radically open minded or of westernised thought. May be you can watch action but when it comes to dialogues and body language its something you never want to see with elders.
With that said everyone should watch these movie because it simply a experience which was never created in Indian movies.
May be down the line 5-10 years we can expect movies like memories of murders, parasites, old boy, raid 2 especially for action here too.
totally agree with you brother , this movie was a goddamn experience , very few times we see the tangent going in different direction in so called "big indian commercial" movies from the same garbage that we make , rajamouli is one of the few gems who does this , and now vanga , man you cant tell that this is this mans second movie as a director , the direction , the screenplay , the editing , and the superb acting , the unapologetic vision was unparalled .
And if a person is just that dumb that he or she just can't enjoy this just as movie like a mature person than what to say , indian audience has always being dumb but the least they can do is see the uniqueness and the balls of the actor and the director to present such thing in the biggest way possible or people can just sit and complain why we dont make unique things and take a break from the same garbage that india produces.
Pinnacle of gore violence??? 😭😭
GOW dekhi hai
@@watchhere6200 GOW ka pata nahi but bhai Saw, Texas Chainsaw massacre, halloween, spit on your grave etc bahot movies dekhi hai but Jin logo so animal movie ka violence wala part handle nahi ho Raha woh shayad kabhi proper gore ya splatter movies dekhe hi na jaise human centipede.
Baat main animal movie ki kar raha tha apni watchlist ki nahi. Thoda toh context toh dekh lo, ek word ko leke pure comment ka hi intention badal diya.
We already did Old Boy. It was called Zinda😂😂😂
@@rishabhkashyap619 Seriously? Human Centipede ka promotion?
These people won’t bash a movie if it was directed and produced by top directors in Hollywood. A cinema can tell a story of anything! If you have a problem with then you should avoid it… even if you don’t like it then say movie is not good. What movie represents is what movie is meant to represent!
Perfect ans He's just making this video for views
It's just a movie that's it . If you thank a movie story seriously in your life then the problem is in you
And my question is what does he know about movies , he makes video about politics and suddenly he's reviewing a movie ( that's unexpected )
Does he know the story behind the movie that people criticize for making movie like he want . That's why he made this movie
At the end you are a fool if you think a movie is how people want to portray their story ( the meaning of film )
@@jshasan865 🤣🤣🤣
Yes they would. They bashed Scarface and Cimino.
Plenty of Hollywood movies are trash and are bashed world wide. Upon its release Scarface was also bashed .
You have no idea bro, If Vanga made these films in Hollywood, he would straight out cancelled.
This is the best analysis of the problems with Animal movie that i have heard so far. Yes, an artist has the right to express themselves the way they want to, but it’s the the reaction of the masses, that makes this
Movie scary. And the man who made it, who is catering to the people with same warped mentality as his own. It scares girls and women like me that this world is not a safe place to live. May be You are right. As women we are stupid to think that in the last 15-20 years, the new generation of men have evolved. What bothers me the most is that Sandeep Reddy Vanga how confidently declared that there is no need for change. That’s how humans should be.
Ohhh!! Thank God!! I saw your review. Have been searching for a review like this that's not plain black or white, to talk about the craft but also point out the consequences of the film on the audience. And everything you said makes absolute sense. A film like this that's high on craft but pushes the moral envelope needs the nuanced expression. And you're the only reviewer by far that has put up with so much in depth analysis. Thank you for the review.
Anti feminist is the best
Extremely few boy friends would behave violently with their girl friends like Arjun Reddy behaves with Preethi. Yet, Arjun Reddy is a good film coz it is high on entertainment quotient, and also has sound logic in the plot. Critics should not mix up a movie and real life
If you say so.
Arjun Reddy is a good film??
@@AP-nu7hb if u feel it’s not, what according to u is a good film❓
U say this,yet much of the audience (many uneducated people) incorporate these bad traits into their lives
@@praneelgottipati7301few points...
(1) Arjun hits Preethi. Preethi also hits Arjun in climax. Yet, I agree boy hitting girl is avoidable due to girl's lesser PHYSICAL strength
(2) Body exists not to hit. All organs do their duties so to produce energy for mind to function. Thus body is a servant of the mind, primarily. So, if one sees logically, hitting a body is UNINTELLIGENCE
(3) Ranvijay (in Animal) going into class room while shooting his machine gun can not INFLUENCE coz none have access to a mc gun. But guys may get inflluenced with hero's violent mind, and become violent themselves. Arjun's vulgar language, physical violence in Arjun Reddy can influence guys a lot as they directly RELATE their lives with hero's lives
(4) Yet, movies are 1 way a guy gets influenced. The guy has been under continuous influence from society ever since he became conscious. A guy picks negatives quite quickly from internet (on mobile or tablet or laptop) or news tv channels os talks with friends and so on. So movies is just 1 among many.
(5) Definition of democracy -> No restriction to a human mind's thought, but restriction exists to a human's actions. If actions violate the legal laws, will be punished. Movie is an expression of the director's thoughts. Hence 100% legal
(6) There is more violence in books than movies coz everything can not be easily converted into audio-visual format. Yet, movies are considered as more capable of influencing due to the visual format
(7) Movie is a creative field. If a director is worried about movie's influence on public, he can not be creative. Already there are extremely limited number of stories all over the world. If story telling is also restricted, it prevents the expression of director's creativity. I believe movie should be allowed to be completely creative and drop censor board also because there is no censor to movies on internet (OTTs, etc)
(8) If a guy is negatively influenced by movies, that's his problem. Different people get differently influenced. Depends on the intellectual strength of the guy. Country's legal rules take care of misbehaving guys. Eventually, it's up to a guy how he wants to live. All kinds of people exist in society with or without movies.
(9) If a girl in the society is facing the negative side of movie's influence on a guy, the girl can use her analytical skills to make wiser decisions. Else, up to her fate.
THE VERY THOUGHT THAT THE MAIN LEAD SHOULD HAVE A SQUEAKY CLEAN "HERO" IMAGE IS OLD SCHOOL. NOWHERE IN THE MOVIE IS IT SHOWN THAT THE MAN IS PERFECT. THE CHARACTER IS JUST A HUMAN, WITH SHADES OF GREY, OBSESSED WITH HIS DAD THAT HE WOULD GO ANY EXTENT TO PROTECT HIM. NOW ABOUT THE MISOGYNY AND VIOLENCE MENTIONED. I AM SURE THE VERY SAME CRITICS WHO LOOK UPTO MOVIES LIKE THE GODFATHER, SCARFACE, GOODFELLAS, AMERICAN PSYCHO, KILL BILL, TAXI DRIVER, PULP FICTION AND THE LIKE FOR THEIR ART (WHICH BY THE WAY, HAS ELEMENTS OF EXTREME MISOGYNY/VIOLENCE) LOOK DOWN ON MOVIES LIKE ANIMAL OR KABIR SINGH. STATING THAT THE CHARACTER PLAYED BY BOBBY DEOL RAPES AND ABUSES WOMEN IS AS GOOD AS SAYING, "OH MY! THE JOKER HAS MASSACRED SO MANY PEOPLE! HOW DARE HE!" ANOTHER ONE OF THESE DOUBLE STANDARDS WAS SEEN WHEN PEOPLE SAY THE MAIN LEAD DISRESPECTS A WOMAN BY PULLING THE BRA STRAP AND ASKING ANOTHER TO LICK HIS SHOE. IT'S AS SILLY AS ME SAYING, "OH MY! I AM SO OFFENDED THAT THE CHARACTER WISHED HER DAD-IN-LAW DIDN'T SURVIVE THE GUN SHOT. I AM SO AGGRIEVED THAT THE WOMAN WHO MADE LOVE WITH THE PROTAGONIST TURNED OUT TO BE A MOLE!" LIKE ANY MOVIE, THESE ARE PLOTS WITH LAYERED CHARACTERS. A MOVIE, UNLIKE A SPEECH, NEED NOT DELIVER A UNIVERSAL MESSAGE. THAT'S WHY MOVIES HAVE RATINGS, WHICH IS STILL NEW IN INDIAN CINEMA.
Baap of feminists and liberals long live Reddy Anna 😂😂😂😂
U don't know that u like the film r not..but reviewing the film..wow!❤❤❤
Now they want to tell people which movie to like and which one to dislike😂
Loved a video after a while in quint! Great analysis
now since Quint has said not to like it, I am damn sure I will like the film once I see it...
Great effort to promote animal
The quint
Post more reviews about this film
Excellent review. Just immature audience in the comment section jo bas timepass ke liye movie dekhte na ki art ke liye. Agar artko samjhenge tho pata chaltha kitna ghatiya film banaya gya hai socially, technically and emotionally. He badly needs a therapist that SRV
Bhai, art film banao aur dekho kitte log dekhe hain movie ko. Bhai, dekhne walo ko entertainment chahiyebass
@@devv9051 art film separate nhi hotha bhai. Film making hi ek art hain. Wahi mve utna hi gore aur violence ke saath badi achi se banaya jaa saktha tha, aur bane bhi hai vaise. Lekin uss Vanga ko film karna aatha hi nhi. Bass attitude dikhana aatha hai.
Let the film be just films dont fall for reviews you know well what it is offering go for it if you want, dont go if you dont watch violence. It's not a bad film at all. These are just so called woke critics.
Exactly! True. First of all there is nothing called "woke critics". These are not Critics at all but the other groups of Boycott Gangs in disguise of Critics.
Don't worry bro all know these internet world who is who enjoy
As a person who hasn't watched this triggering ,neo noir movie , it is so satisfying to see these english chattering and extremely marxist people having emotional outburst
why overreact.....it was such a good film and such a good written character....relax its a film
you have clearly laid out my own thoughts about this film honestly. every opinion i had of this movie was just said by you. one thing i would add though is that my biggest complaint of this film was quite simply that it doesn't actually know what it wants to be. at times it wants to be a personal family drama., at times a gritty revenge thriller, at times a masala action film, and overall the messaging of the film feels very torn and not in the best way. i have zero issues with a violent film. i have zero issues with a violent film with skewed morality . i have an issue with a film that wants to feel gritty and dark and brutal but not being able to escape the curse of bollywoodization.
Last scene is for you
"Should not like". Well, people on the internet are now defining what we "should like" and "shouldn't like". I don't understand why can't people perceive a movie as a movie!? It's just a movie dam't and it''s okay if I or anybody else likes it! Don't like it, don't have to ask anybody to watch it, but please stop imposing your standards, ideals and political correctness on people and expecting them to conform. Yes, a movie does have an influence but not as much as the wokes are claiming, there are several other evils undermining the society which need to be paid attention to rather than going batshit crazy over a movie's portrayal of something in a certain way. It's just a form of entertainment!
Whatever this filim tried, jelikettu( Malayalam) did it way before 😂😂😂
Prateek, you have succinctly put across a sensible review of the movie.
Keep it up! 👍
Whatever Quint says, DO THE EXACT OPPOSITE! 😊
Apka wo point.. Ke scarface nd gangsow jaise movies me banda end me apne actions ke liye pay karta hai. But yaha ego massage ki feel hai. That is an important point. Makes me think
Scarface was a 1 installment movie.
Animal is having it's 2nd or might be 3rd so can't expect ki Ranvijay pehele hi part me mar jaye
@@Richie.Rich69 ya. That's a valid point
Wat about John wick?
Whole credit goes to Sandeep reddy vanga, what a director he is? Ultimate👌👌
I completely agree with you.... movies like this are really spoiling are generations
Aap ott pe content dekhiye aur fir is film se comparison kijiye,ott pe sirf nagapan aur sex dikha rahein hai,kya usse generation kharab nahi hoga.
A biopic on Sandeep Reddy Vangas father is the need of the hour.😂😂😂😂
He is your father ❤de...🐖🐖🐷
🐖🐖🐖🐽🐽🐷
@@_MAHESH007 What is his name?
@@sauron2000000 nee yyama hook ra howle...
@@_MAHESH007 Dengutawa raaa raaa raaa
We like Animal ,u fools are still on stage of Pathan and Jawan as cult classics 😂
Who goes to theatre to learn morality, ethics etc.
Well done, Prateek. Good stuff.
Director is demeaning women and women will not be violent.
So this movie will not hamper men.
Can't be more agree 💯.. Best review.May be or may be not.i enjoy the cinematography but not how it portrait
This movie was made to offend people that's why its rated adult,i personally think movie was good ,if you don't see all the characters as heroes because they are shown as animals with wild nature.
Bro is so scared of giving a honest opinion and gave a half-assed review on how the people should feel about the movie.
Pratiksha is right. I thought about that as well
Thanks for this video. It perfectly reflected my thoughts. I was only seeing videos of either side of the like/hate spectrum, and this movie needs a more nuanced analysis like this
Thank you😊
I'm actually confused whether I like the film or not. But I definitely don't hate it. If a film can extract such a deep response from you, I think there's merit to that..
He connected well with movie...but morally bound hain bichara job ke kaaran.
Shahid was amazing as Kabir singh
Absolute madness director doesn't give fuck to anybody ( last seen justified it also) 🎉🎉💥
So these people are gonna tell us what to like and not like ? Do they think they own us ?
Why do artist need to take a moralist stand bro..? Why not a bad film can teach good things..? Movies are not religious scriptures to teach good and pls don't expect righteousness from movies
Nobody is expecting righteousness from vanga. He is not capable of it.
@@finddeepali might not be you, but the bro who is reviewing is expecting. Haha
@@finddeepaliits fictional
I think he is mohak mangal🥲
I LOVEE MOHAK! 😍
It's good that some amount of people are offended by this movie, it'll do more negative publicity & as a result a new kind of cinema will take birth in India. 20-30 years later filmmakers will praise Vanga to be daring enough to have made this movie in 2023
so now quint is deciding what people should like and what you shouldn't , nice, way to go as a independent news channl
This is what expected form quint😂😂😂
Can anyone say Sandeep Vanga stop repeating same story line and cast and try to make a same movie with violent alpha female character?
Its then we will see how good he is a director???
And for God's sake in Gangs of Wasseypur all the female characters were strong to a level and not mere soft puppets.
After watching this review i am gonna go for a next show
Can you explain what makes it highly misogynistic to you; within the context of where that moment was?
Why would anyone go so deep, it' s just a craft enacted beautifully by brilliant actors, it is same as great women potray different beautiful roles on the screen. Come on, Sandeep created a great movie yet again, if someone doesn't like it , dnt watch it brother/sister, but just don't pull someone down for what they created, I am a woman but I am not offended about how he has potrayed men & women in the movies, it is just 3 hour dramatic movie. It's how one percieves the content, none can sit and judge Tom n Jerry and make sense out of it. I think we all need to try to find sense in our own lives rather than sitting and judging around. I had fun, songs are beautiful and all the actors did a good job!! Peace out & stay blessed😊😊🙏🙏
It is a good movie
What is good about it
How?
Very sensibly put .
Animal is not for every audience. It's one of the paradise for hardcore movie lovers💯
Every film maker pushes their own belief system through their films. Its upto you how much attention will you give to it, recently sanju shows Sanjay Dutt as a victim. I dont beleive that fact, but I enjoyed the movie because of the engaging screenplay, the acting, the presentation etc. Similarly, in animal I found the screenplay weak, but the presentation of Ranbir, his performance, Background score, music was brilliant. Why do we have to buy the politics of the movie to our soul to enjoy it. Every movie will not move you from your core, that's rare. This is a mainstream bollywood movie,grab popcorn and enjoy. If you arent, simply dont watch. Creating controversy will only result more eyeballs on the movie.
Its not about being anti this or anti that… just simple is that movie was not good enough or overhyped. I don’t expect to learn anything from a movie but want to be entertained. This movie feels good coz performances are good but story wise its a drag!
I think being such a diverse country we cannot counsel upon the morality point of view while watching entertainment content, by the same logic young girls shouldn't be watching 'Four More Shots' cause its so wrong on so many levels but here we are that show has 3 seasons cause people (majorly girls) watch it, do it leave an impression on them? Yes!, is it scary to think about? Yes!
Four more shots is garbage and animal is also garbage. Where is sensible content gone these days. Everything is so extreme.
Absolutely love your thoughts on the film , absolutely resonates with what I’ve been thinking
I think you're over exaggerating he can't even slap his wife but can kill hundreds of men he says to his sister's to be independent and asks them to choose their husbands independently
He mentioned director celebrated Animal characters. But by which way he celebrated ? What makes characters being celebrated?
Having uplifting soundtrack, showing stylized visuals, having the main character show no remorse or even being proud of the behaviour . Some ways to make audience support the character.
@@finddeepali
1. Having uplifting soundtrack? Every movies has some kind of bgm for protagonist or antagonist which liked by audience according to their taste, don't know how it relate to celebrate ing wrong deeds of thay character
2. Stylish visuals? 😂 Again every movie has different types of stylish visuals even for villain, people liking it doesn't necessarily mean that they support the wrong doings of the charector
3. Also charector showing no remorse of what he had done thats why movie name is animal
Ironically Vanga is woke. Shocked? I mean, he is exactly like them.
Both are loud, narcissist, playing the victim , incapable of hearing critisim. Just shut up and listen to them.
Also the love for self-insert main character. The one thing I absolutely hate in a story bcs it becomes what the writer believes and not a contrasting tale of different characters.
The day I saw his Anupam interview after KS. I knew exactly he isn't making a movie. He is creating a fan fiction where he is the self-insert lead, who does all problematic things without any care. I mean, it's his world ,so ofcourse he can do anything. Who gonna oppose him in his story?
That is why he has so much trouble in accepting critisim. Bcs he sees it's an attack on him and not a character he created. His character never admits he is wrong bcs Vanga can never be wrong.
I am sure in upcoming interviews we will find out he has same relationship with his father like in Animal.
The man is trying to cop by making movies and seeking gratification for his toxic mentality. He needs therapy, seriously.
Anurag Kashyap has far better understanding of writing and world building than Vanga does. Kashyap writes stories with layers , nuances and explores different characters and perspectives. Whereas, Vanga does is - him in romantic story. Him in revange drama. It always about him.
Do you think Vanga will ever make Ugly like movie?
Very well said dude!
Anurag kashyap also shows brutality and violence but it is never for sake of it. Kashyap is 10 times better than vanga when it comes to craft
Gangs of wasseypur ka rich version laga meko
Do I personally care about what critics have to say ? Absolutely not.
But as an concerned citizen I am definitely not encouraging teens to watch it. One has to have a clear maturity, the ability to make a boundary between reel and real life before watching it.
No I dont think he failed. I think as a Filmmaker he has opened dialogue to address the issue of people like the ones sitting behind you in the theater who reacted nonchalantly at the marital rape scene. It is clear that Vanga knew what he was trying to achieve on film.
The title of the video itself feels arrogant and entitled. Are you imposing your views on me?
Pretty hypocritical for quint
To all the critics, if you see the story of animal and the Godfather is similar where a son becomes a gangster and kills everyone who attacked his father. But the Godfather has very good rating and is praised where animal is criticised to be too violent. Yes there could be better story writing and direction in case of animal but in areas if acting and cinematography it has done great job.
To the people who are telling it is misogynistic, Rashmika did left Ranbir at last. I think it says all.
What I and Prateek wants to say is every film teaches something, it depends on you how you interpret it.
I like your intro for Sandeep Vanga ..Anti Woke, Anti Feminist !!!
God just don’t forget this takes place in it’s own class mafia world and his dad was under constant threat!! Protagonist is a unique character… deal with it…. it is heroic too coz he overcame the danger (atleast part of it)
Much sensible review than Baradwaj Rangan’s.
RGV and Vanga are 2 directors who have dismantled the stereotype movies.
A hero may be masculine enough to save his family at the same time succumb for the love of his only hero.
Secondly the brotherhood the way social construct worked ,the way he reaches out to his cousins is something to take as a learning.
The conviction he wants from his wife is all that a man needs to achieve and sail through tides.
The character of Rannvijay doesnt ask you to losen your pants or cheat rather explains that how " the man " is vulenerable infront of a woman.
I had prejudices about the movie.Went to watch Ranbir & for the sake of director Vanga.Well crafted movie.
what I remembered when Ranbir slit the throat is 2 things - the last offer of Krishna to give 5 villages to avoid Mahabharta and the way ISIS slit the throats .
Lastly , wokes ki L laga di Sanddep Vanga ne
As long as you misunderstand the entire satire surrounding the maximalism and alpha-masculinity of all that Animal is and where all these comes from and actions which are subsequently relevant in the context of the character that RK play and how craftfully Vanga plays with your perception of the character that he intended to be hated in the first place, it would always be a poke on your butt that's synthetically liberal and poutingly touchy.
What is point of making a movie that has nothing to say
Ye pakka animal park bhi dekhne jayega ..fr humko bolega movie mat dekho..apne aap se questions poocho dekhne se pahle ..😅😅
Critic/Reviewer can see a movie in 2 ways :
(1) What if there exists some where in society a guy like the protagonist of the movie!
(2) What if none exists in society like the movie's protagonist, and the protagonist is completely a fictional character in a fictional story created by the director
You should allow for such possibilities, instead of judging a movie as misogynistic or violent or something else. It is an adult film. That's all. Meaningless to call a FICTIONAL movie misogynistic (or some other movie misandristic)
No?