Useless Overweight Tanks of WW2

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 10 лют 2025
  • Play Call of War for FREE on PC, iOS or Android: 💥play.callofwar...
    Receive a Unique Starter Pack, available only for the next 30 days!
    Check out our other Channel: / @simplehistorylive
    Discord server: / discord
    Become a Simple History member: www.youtube.co...
    Copyright: DO NOT translate and re-upload our content on UA-cam or other social media.
    SIMPLE HISTORY MERCHANDISE
    Get the Simple History books on Amazon:
    www.amazon.com...
    T-Shirts
    teespring.com/...
    Simple history gives you the facts, simple!
    See the book collection here:
    Amazon USA
    www.amazon.com/...
    Amazon UK
    www.amazon.co.u...
    / simple-history-5494376...
    / simplehistoryyt
    Credit:
    Show Created by Daniel Turner (B.A. (Hons) in History, University College London)
    Script: Rob De Graff
    Narrator:
    Chris Kane
    vocalforge.com/

КОМЕНТАРІ • 656

  • @Simplehistory
    @Simplehistory  Рік тому +180

    Play Call of War for FREE on PC, iOS or Android: 💥play.callofwar.com/q5L6/SH01
    Receive a Unique Starter Pack, available only for the next 30 days!

    • @OceanWilks
      @OceanWilks Рік тому +1

      can you talk about canada in the war

    • @crazy_adventures6326
      @crazy_adventures6326 Рік тому +3

      Second!

    • @Sailingspeedat9kn
      @Sailingspeedat9kn Рік тому +2

      Common misconception the tog never had a QF ordinance 17prd cannon rather it had a QF ordinance 32prd 94mm cannon
      In the early phase of TOG II It also had tow duble machinegun sponsons and a QF ordinance 6prd cannon in place of the frontal mounted machinegun
      Nice animations

    • @CHICKENNUGGETHERO1
      @CHICKENNUGGETHERO1 Рік тому +1

      Thanks for gold

    • @CHICKENNUGGETHERO1
      @CHICKENNUGGETHERO1 Рік тому

      ​@@crazy_adventures6326 not

  • @corymorimacori1059
    @corymorimacori1059 Рік тому +567

    “The tank was originally invented to clear the way for the infantry in the teeth of machine gun fire. Now it is the infantry who will have to clear a way for the tanks.” Winston Churchill

    • @CHICKENNUGGETHERO1
      @CHICKENNUGGETHERO1 Рік тому +19

      Underrated comment and i gave it 9th comment

    • @morkegamer
      @morkegamer 9 місяців тому +4

      Depends on the type of a tank, light tanks can clear the way for the infantry easily

  • @birdmcrandomsux
    @birdmcrandomsux Рік тому +256

    I never thought id hear simple history saying “absolute unit” unironically 😭

    • @CHICKENNUGGETHERO1
      @CHICKENNUGGETHERO1 Рік тому +2

      Wth is a absolute unit

    • @Astralshadow95
      @Astralshadow95 Рік тому +20

      ​@imachickennugget3966 essentially just slang for someone or something much larger then average like when you see a walrus that is larger the any of the ones around it you could say it is an "absolute unit"

    • @CHICKENNUGGETHERO1
      @CHICKENNUGGETHERO1 Рік тому +1

      @@Astralshadow95 ok

    • @ALonelyCorsair
      @ALonelyCorsair Рік тому +3

      @@Astralshadow95 hello absolute unit :)

    • @necronticgaming6186
      @necronticgaming6186 6 місяців тому

      😂😂😂😂funny😂😂😂😂

  • @thejudge2778
    @thejudge2778 Рік тому +51

    Can you talk about "no armor is best armor".

  • @Tundraviper41
    @Tundraviper41 Рік тому +48

    Fun fact: During the war, Porsche experimented with Electric Motors for Tank Transmissions, which increased the power of the tanks acceleration (Torque). This saw use in the Porche Tiger/ Ferdinand, and the Maus. The Electric Motor in the Maus was so powerful as a result of its 1200hp torpedo boat engine and with a panther providing extra power, mostly assisted itself getting free of the mud pit that it sank into. Electric motors on the Tiger P, in fact, were in some ways better than the Transmission of the Tiger H. But lack of rare metals like copper in germany limited their use in german tanks.

    • @dominikmeril1720
      @dominikmeril1720 11 місяців тому +2

      thats good to know
      but as an improvement: you write Porsche with an S. i know you dont really think of it if you say it in english, but here in germany you can really hear it then:)

    • @Tundraviper41
      @Tundraviper41 8 місяців тому

      @@dominikmeril1720 Crap I just now noticed I missed the S!!!

  • @inductivegrunt94
    @inductivegrunt94 Рік тому +109

    Forget subtlety, embrace Absolute Units.
    Tog 2 best absolute unit tank.

  • @thetankcommander3838
    @thetankcommander3838 Рік тому +51

    GW Tiger and GW Tiger (P) were technically two different vehicles entirely. GW Tiger - which was real - was captured at Paderborn in 1945 along with the sole E-100 chassis. It was built on the Tiger II hull, heavily modified to mount the 170mm gun. The GW Tiger (P) was something envisioned for the remaining VK45.01(P) hulls. I have a book on these things.

  • @crazy_adventures6326
    @crazy_adventures6326 Рік тому +570

    Germans in a nutshell:
    Hans, we need better transmission!
    Ah, bigger cannon, you say?
    Nein Hans, better transmission!
    Ah, so more armor?
    Nein! I said, BETTER TRANSMISSION!
    Oooh, *B A T T L E S H I P C A N N O N* !
    *JA HANS!*

    • @Danzel_Gaming
      @Danzel_Gaming Рік тому +24

      Tank fish?

    • @CHICKENNUGGETHERO1
      @CHICKENNUGGETHERO1 Рік тому +9

      Underated comment and i gave it the 20th like

    • @stephenforsberg4038
      @stephenforsberg4038 Рік тому +14

      I think I once heard that... the german head official/leader would think of the battlefield more towards a WW1 setting due to being a veteran of said war (like railway guns to smash fortified lines). It also wouldn't help if the germans didn't have time to design new tank frames with better (reliable required) engines that can be manufactured in mass.

    • @bromhead
      @bromhead Рік тому +5

      @@CHICKENNUGGETHERO1 he saying that he is stealing a quote from tank fish

    • @CHICKENNUGGETHERO1
      @CHICKENNUGGETHERO1 Рік тому +1

      @@bromhead oh

  • @fakkeltje9871
    @fakkeltje9871 Рік тому +24

    I love the " never ending " TOG 2, hilarious touch!

  • @Angelthewolf
    @Angelthewolf Рік тому +52

    Small correction, the TOG II has a 28 pounder, not a 17 pounder. It‘s a common mistake

    • @hyneksmid3293
      @hyneksmid3293 Рік тому +1

      Yaeh. Older version of tank gun used in Tortoise.

    • @williamanstis
      @williamanstis Рік тому +3

      and a lot more armour than three inches

    • @test_dude
      @test_dude Рік тому +3

      It doesn't help that Bovington still lists it as a 17 pounder cannon. even though it's measured to be a 28 pounder.

    • @Angelthewolf
      @Angelthewolf Рік тому +5

      @@test_dude that becomes even more stupid considering that the people at bovington literally were the ones to find out that it has a 28 pounder

  • @tyberzahn7398
    @tyberzahn7398 Рік тому +33

    Surprised you didn't mention the American version of the Tortoise: the T95/T28 super heavy tank. Even slower, and more armor. And managed to remain hidden for decades...

    • @jaskim5723
      @jaskim5723 9 місяців тому +4

      The good old Doom Turtle

    • @fishingthelist4017
      @fishingthelist4017 22 дні тому

      I have seen it out at Fort Benning when the US Armor and Cavalry Collection has an open house. It is a monster, and totally impractical in any theater of WW2.

  • @jadentetzlaff1108
    @jadentetzlaff1108 Рік тому +57

    Now this is what I call the absolute units of ground assault. now we need a ship and plane version!

    • @errorerror6927
      @errorerror6927 Рік тому +1

      I think ships would be pretty obvious

    • @CHICKENNUGGETHERO1
      @CHICKENNUGGETHERO1 Рік тому

      Underrated comment and i gave it 14 th like😊

    • @CHICKENNUGGETHERO1
      @CHICKENNUGGETHERO1 Рік тому

      @@errorerror6927 bull

    • @Predator42ID
      @Predator42ID Рік тому +5

      Of those built the largest were in this order Yamato, Iowa, Bismarck, and Vanguard. The Iowa class won as the largest battleship you can still visit.

    • @CHICKENNUGGETHERO1
      @CHICKENNUGGETHERO1 Рік тому

      @@Predator42ID nah

  • @fenyoarpi2627
    @fenyoarpi2627 Рік тому +22

    As a Hungarian, I'm glad that you showcased our dreamtanks of ww2, and what actually suprises me that the pronounciation of "rohamlöveg" was quietly on spot in my opinion! :) And also if you don't want to break your tounge pronounciating it, just say assault gun, because it is exactly what it means in hungarian :D Assault gun - Rohamlöveg. I really enjoyed the video btw. Love u guys.

  • @thetankcommander3838
    @thetankcommander3838 Рік тому +94

    I had a distant ancestor who was the gunner of a Jagdtiger. His name and rank were Unteroffizier Fritz Klein. He as the gunner of Jagdtiger 131, attached to Schwerer Panzerjäger Abtielung 653. Tragically, he would meet his end in March, 1945 near Heidelberg. As his Jagdtiger came into an intersection, it was shot in the left side by the 76.2mm M1A2 gun of an M4A3E8 Sherman “Easy 8”. Set on fire, the crew was forced to evacuate. Fritz was sadly one of the two crewmen that were gunned down by machine gun fire. Unusual how families can be on both sides of war, no?

    • @PROVOCATEURSK
      @PROVOCATEURSK Рік тому +10

      One fought against the evil commies, one fought with the evil commies.

    • @Smartyvoy
      @Smartyvoy Рік тому

      The Sherman Easy Eight and others were equipped with the 76 mm gun. Only the British equipped the sherman with the 76.2 mm, which was known as the 17 pounder, and their sherman were nicknamed Firefly.

    • @thetankcommander3838
      @thetankcommander3838 Рік тому +6

      @@Smartyvoy not true. According to old documents from the U.S. Army Ordnance Department, it was indeed said that the new guns on M18 Hellcat and M4A3E8 Shermans were 76.2mm. Even Wikipedia - which I know is not reliable, even says 76.2mm. I also heard from an Easy 8 crewman from the Korean War that it is in fact a 76.2mm gun. So, sources are there.

    • @williamrobinson827
      @williamrobinson827 Рік тому +1

      It would have been particularly interesting if you had another ancestor who was in that particular Sherman!

    • @thetankcommander3838
      @thetankcommander3838 Рік тому +2

      @@williamrobinson827 possibly. I mean, I had an ancestor on HMS Hood and a few on KMS Bismarck. My ancestors HATED each other. 😅😅😅

  • @abzzeus
    @abzzeus Рік тому +18

    The TOG was supposed to have suponsons like the WWI tanks but they were never fitted/designed The turret was meant to have various options, till someone put a under development A30 turret on it

  • @victory7999
    @victory7999 Місяць тому +1

    Glad that the 44M Tas was mentioned as it deserves more recognition, but it absolutely isn't "useless" or "overweight" in any way. It was a very promising design that weighed 36.6 tons. I'm not sure how you count a 36.6 ton tank as overweight, but not mention the Maus (188 tons), E-100 (100+ tons), P.1000 Ratte (1000+ tons), O-I (100+ tons), T28/T95 (86 tons), Char 2C (69 tons), KV-5 (~100 tons), IS-7 (68 tons), Tiger II (68.5 tons), etc.
    On a side note, a video dedicated to the Hungarian tank industry would be really appreciated and would help people learn about the forgotten Hungarian tanks. Hungary built around 1000 of their own tanks, and was basically the only minor power to have its own tank industry, which is truly remarkable.

  • @Thegraviesttimothy
    @Thegraviesttimothy Рік тому +38

    Meanwhile in the German Tank Development Office:
    “Hans? We need better communications.”
    “Nein . Big battleship cannon!”
    “Ja Hans! Big battleship cannon!”

  • @venstoma
    @venstoma 11 місяців тому +4

    10:17 So as it turns out, a Maus when faced with 120mm APFSDS, undergoes partial mitosis

  • @Yashuop
    @Yashuop Рік тому +2566

    I will do 1 Pushup for every like i get on this comment 💪🏻

  • @williamlunabrown6618
    @williamlunabrown6618 Рік тому +27

    My brain in 2 seconds:
    Look at the size of this lad:
    *ABSOLUTE*
    *UNIT*

  • @Kyleplier
    @Kyleplier Рік тому +4

    The Jagdtiger is in War Thunder at 7.3 for Arcade Ground Battles and 6.7 BR for Realistic and Simulator Ground Battles respectively. I myself have recently got the KV-1 in the Soviet Army Tech tree. She’s a hard nut to take down especially when she’s angled. Just yesterday I went 7-0 in the KV-1.

  • @PitFriend1
    @PitFriend1 Рік тому +20

    You didn’t mention the “American Tortoise”, the T28 super heavy tank. Which only survived being scrapped because the US Army parked the thing in a field and forgot about it for 20 years.

    • @bricefleckenstein9666
      @bricefleckenstein9666 Рік тому +4

      Better known as the T95 - it changed designation a couple times, between Assault Gun (which is what is was designed to be, VERY similar and same reason the Tortoise came into being) and "Super Heavy Tank" (even though it had no turret).
      There were 2 completed, one scrapped the other lost in a field (big vehicle, but fairly low profile - guess the grass grew over it).

    • @kek8230
      @kek8230 9 місяців тому

      Tutel🐢

    • @Lukasthefloof
      @Lukasthefloof 9 місяців тому

      ​@bricefleckenstein9666 the remaining t28/95 is at fort moore

    • @superspaceman34
      @superspaceman34 4 місяці тому

      The one in whichever museum was discovered by a hunter, if I remember right.

  • @balazsbalintfacklmann4782
    @balazsbalintfacklmann4782 Рік тому +42

    FINALLY!
    HUNGARIAN WEAPONS!

    • @kanseidorifto2430
      @kanseidorifto2430 Рік тому +3

      Having now piqued my curiosity, I’m gonna go over Hungarian history and see what cool weapons they had 🔥

    • @InsectShooter
      @InsectShooter 11 місяців тому

      You should research goulash canon. The French military claimed it was a moving artirelly and it was feared amongs them. :D​@@kanseidorifto2430

    • @Rubert0426
      @Rubert0426 11 місяців тому

      Bár igaz teljesen rossz infót közölt velünk, de igen
      A Tas-t sohasem fejezték be a szovjet bombázások miatt, és csak egy fa prot. volt amivel semmire se mentünk.
      Páncélzata eredetileg 100 mm, majd később 80 mm (mint a Panthernek ismét) re változtatták a tervekben.
      A roham löveg, meg csak egy koncepció volt, A HIDEGHÁBORÚBAN

    • @Gaming.N.Stuff.Official
      @Gaming.N.Stuff.Official 9 місяців тому

      MAYGAR!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    • @melvinbennett444
      @melvinbennett444 3 місяці тому

      By the time they figured out they needed their own medium/heavy tank, they had lost an entire Army (Hungarian 1st) of the only 2 Armies they fielded in WW2. A ...perfect example of Too Little, Too Late !

  • @smtoonturkce
    @smtoonturkce Рік тому +1

    *Now this is what I call the absolute units of ground assault. now we need a ship and plane version!*

  • @derredviper
    @derredviper Рік тому +5

    @10:02 Phineas: hey Ferb, I know what we are gonna do today. *mississippi queen starts playing*

  • @Unfassbarer
    @Unfassbarer Рік тому

    Danke!

  • @ndrew.Vietnam
    @ndrew.Vietnam Рік тому +7

    Love this Chanel, keep up the great work❤❤❤

  • @327Federal
    @327Federal Рік тому +9

    327 Federal Magnum is a Phenomenal Revolver Cartridge

  • @85szabolcs
    @85szabolcs 7 місяців тому +1

    I love the 44M Tas so much and it bothers me that it never got a chance to prove itself.

  • @vietnamtoivodich-wk6sf
    @vietnamtoivodich-wk6sf Рік тому +3

    The Panther could have been an excellent tank if Hitler hadn't forced the engineers to make it heavier

  • @yamatohime2035
    @yamatohime2035 Рік тому +2

    I remember reading how Soviet tanks were stopped by JagdTiger but ISU-152 managed to land 50 kg HE shell on its front plate... And JagdTiger just stopped firing.

  • @ExecutorGCW
    @ExecutorGCW Рік тому +2

    A very well made video! Here's some further information regarding a couple of tanks featured here;
    The Hungarian Tas Rohamlöveg has unfortunately been debunked as a fake tank. Its concept was based on a theory in the 1980s regarding shared components but disproven by Hungarian archived records in the late 2000s. There were in fact orders for two 44M prototypes and no mention of any assault gun variant anywhere, so it likely never existed.
    Further, the TOG II had closer of up to 4.5in of frontal armour whilst being armed with a 94mm 28pdr though Bovington is yet to correct their mistake after remeasuring, and has been additionally proven by TOG II documents noting the 3.7inch gun.

    • @victory7999
      @victory7999 Місяць тому +1

      Yeah they made a few mistakes, especially when talking about the 44M Tas, however while the Tas Rohamlöveg appeared due to an incorrect assumption by a historian, it doesn't necessarily mean that the Tas Rohamlöveg was a fake tank, considering the Hungarians turned their Toldi and Turan series tanks into tank destroyers, it is quite likely that they at least started to consider making an assault gun variant using the Tas chassis, but considering how much information was lost during and immediately after the war, we may never know. It's best to say there is no confirmation of a Tas Rohamlöveg project existing.

  • @elitetitantimerman
    @elitetitantimerman 5 місяців тому +1

    whoever made that tank in the thumbnail is a demon

  • @aarondutsch5583
    @aarondutsch5583 Рік тому +7

    Germany be like: what if we put something powerful and put it on a tank

    • @EdKolis
      @EdKolis Рік тому +1

      One can only imagine what they would have done with a nuke...

    • @bricefleckenstein9666
      @bricefleckenstein9666 Рік тому

      Reference the Ratte and LandKruiser designs.

  • @kevinfinn6598
    @kevinfinn6598 Рік тому +11

    Most people and sources think the Tog 2 had a 17 pounder gun. It looks like it but Armoured Archives went to the Bovington tank museum and it actually has a 32 (94mm). cannon.

    • @Slye_Fox
      @Slye_Fox Рік тому +2

      *28 pounder, the prototype precursor to the 32 pounder.

  • @starzkream
    @starzkream Рік тому +1

    The Tortoise had 9 inch thick armor?!? That could survive a nuclear blast!

  • @Csarihun
    @Csarihun Рік тому +2

    6:02 it's funny to See an American who is trying to pronunce hungarian word so badly. BTW I love your videos!

  • @neonlightillusion
    @neonlightillusion Рік тому +1

    So, some info on the Tortoise: the remaining unit at Kirkcudbright is little more than a rusted hollow shell, ruined by decades of target practice and salty sea air. Of the six, only two were ever in working order. The four other Tortoises are believed (though there are conflicting stories that they were destroyed) to have been sent over to the BAOR (British Army Of the Rhine) in Germany for some unknown purpose - I’ve been searching for images of them for a few years but haven’t ever found anything.

  • @thebuffalo2263
    @thebuffalo2263 Рік тому +3

    I’d love to see a video on the tragic submarine mishaps over the years.

  • @Fidd88-mc4sz
    @Fidd88-mc4sz 8 місяців тому +1

    Building heavier tanks is NEVER useless. It teaches manufacturers and designers weak-points in design, and allows the tank to evolve. Hence there are now IFV's more heavily armoured, heavier, and with armament better than medium tanks of WW2. Tanks have settled at 45-80 tons, but armour and sensor technology has improved out of all recognition.

    • @Fidd88-mc4sz
      @Fidd88-mc4sz 7 місяців тому

      I should have clarified, the reason tank weights have now stabilised at 45-80 tons, and not increased subsequently, is that despite the weight no longer being an obstacle mechanically in terms of the tank being reliable, it remains a severe problem when it comes to bridge crossings. Most of the bridges in Russia and the old Eastern bloc, pre 1990, are only rated to about 60 tons, meaning Western tanks of 75 tons crossing them safely is not a given, whereas the T64's-T90's CAN cross them west-bound, so to speak. Paranoia affecting bridge design! Back in WW2 of course it was the mechanical side of things that made tanks in this weight range difficult. The great majority of Tiger I's, Panthers, Jagdpanthers and Tiger II's, not to mention the Jagdtiger and (maus) were lost due to fuel exhaustion/engine failure or final drive failure. Far more than were actually lost in combat. The other screw-up related to the sloped front glacis on many of these later types, and the use of a front drive-sprocket, meaning that in order to pull out the final drive by the drivers knees, the tank had to be retrieved, the turret and gun removed before it could even be got at. It took at least 3 days, which was awkward if the enemy advanced in the interim! By way of contrast, the Sherman's final drive could be replaced in 3-4 hours flat! (if it failed at all)

  • @dakotahudson8964
    @dakotahudson8964 Рік тому +2

    'Bigger Is Better' equals "Absolute Waste of Time and Resources'.

  • @robloxserversded
    @robloxserversded Рік тому +2

    Germans:transmision breaking because the vehicle is to heavy? ADD MORE WEIGHT

  • @williamreffett5862
    @williamreffett5862 Рік тому +1

    No, it was its own ability. That's what made it nice.
    They just didn't have capable leaders that could actually use it

  • @mynameisjeff747
    @mynameisjeff747 Рік тому +2

    Rogamloveg was never intended irl

  • @Hevensdragon
    @Hevensdragon 9 місяців тому

    Considering how crews often abandoned them, its suprising only 3 remain.

  • @aeon_zero
    @aeon_zero 11 місяців тому

    -I hear you were in the military.
    -yeah, spent a few years in the Absolute Unit.

  • @tamasbesenyei
    @tamasbesenyei Рік тому +1

    There is an inaccuracy in the video about the 44m tas. It's front armor is divided into 3 plates and only the middle poorly sloped plate is 120 mm the upper and lower plates are only 75 mm making it weaker than the panther.

    • @victory7999
      @victory7999 Місяць тому +1

      Yeah that's true, they didn't label the 120 mm thick armour plate correctly, but it was actually still overall better armoured than the Panther due to thicker plates at higher angles.

  • @darkshock42mlg05
    @darkshock42mlg05 9 місяців тому

    Another interesting one that was never made was the land krüiser. Which was basically supposed to be an aircraft carrier on land and fired the biggest artilery rounds ever made. There's a good reason it was never made. It can't cross any bridge. It's probably as heavy as 10000 fully loaded tractor trailers.

  • @amosmcneal
    @amosmcneal Рік тому +2

    omg thankyou for more tank vids hope to see more in the futre

  • @NashmanNash
    @NashmanNash Рік тому +1

    Fun Fact:The Bovington TOG II actually has the 3.7inch 28pdr gun^^

  • @roxywolfdragon1767
    @roxywolfdragon1767 Рік тому +1

    Love the emphasis on the TOG2s length at 7:30 ha ha ha

  • @jehoiakimelidoronila5450
    @jehoiakimelidoronila5450 Рік тому +2

    You forgot the t-28/t-95, America's only super heavy turretless tank

  • @amelialouma4762
    @amelialouma4762 9 місяців тому

    The Tog 2 was not armed with a 17pdr but with the 28pdr, a 94mm cannon.

  • @WinterTyrant
    @WinterTyrant Рік тому +4

    The bigger the cannon the slower the reload the higher the chance to die if surrounded

  • @dexwy
    @dexwy Рік тому +1

    Well the TOG II was able to go faster than 8.5mph the last surviving TOG II has a damaged transmission which limited its top speed to 8.5mph and the TOG II atcually has a 94mm 28pdr gun. For the longest time people have thought that it had a 17pdr 76mm gun but after somone measured the guns wight he had found out that it indeed was not the 17pdr 76mm gun but the 28pdr 94mm gun.

  • @JohanKlein
    @JohanKlein Рік тому +2

    I am surprised that there is no mention of IS-7 that was nearly adopted for service, but considered "too heavy"? which lead lead to his smaller brother IS-8 (T-10) being adopted.

  • @ryleeculla5570
    @ryleeculla5570 Рік тому

    The way you made the tiger 2 is giving me flash backs to call of duty ww2

  • @doggo3354
    @doggo3354 8 місяців тому

    “If there’s a use to that, I’ll eat my hat.” -Codsworth

  • @psychodelicate
    @psychodelicate Рік тому +3

    Only real ones remember when this was titled Absolute Unit Tanks

  • @TheRealArtimusKnight
    @TheRealArtimusKnight Рік тому +5

    I think if we tried we could totally build a replica of the Ratte

    • @Predator42ID
      @Predator42ID Рік тому

      Not try, do or do not, there is no try. I quote Yoda for the simple fact that if Germany can build a 2,000 ton tracked mining machine, then the Ratte wouldn't be an issue.
      Heck with Russia's lack of true air superiority I can see a few modern versions of the Ratte absolutely decimating the Orcs.

    • @bricefleckenstein9666
      @bricefleckenstein9666 Рік тому

      You mean "build a prototy[e" as it never made it off the drawing board and apparently never even made it TO a "final design" drawing board.
      At least the Landkruser's gun did (also known as the Karl Gustav and the Dora, 2 built one documented to have been used at Stalingrad among other places).

    • @bricefleckenstein9666
      @bricefleckenstein9666 Рік тому

      @@Predator42ID If you're talking about the Baggers, they're a lot more than 2000 tons - but the external power and the sheer HEIGHT of the things would be issues in a fighting vehicle.
      And they make the T95 or Tortise look like race cars.

  • @Hatsune625
    @Hatsune625 Рік тому +5

    fun fact:
    In WT and Wot universe... The tog 2 and Tortoise was nice....
    Tog 2 in wot was tier6 and wanna big HP aside its slow like that video.
    Tortoise in wot is same as Tog2 but having more armor and nice DPM.

    • @johngreen4349
      @johngreen4349 Рік тому

      The Tortoise is also in WT, but it SUCKS! It's lack of mobility makes it near impossible to fight without the help of teammates, and you often lag behind, making you easy prey for aircraft

    • @Hatsune625
      @Hatsune625 Рік тому

      @@johngreen4349 true but being super heavy tank...

    • @bricefleckenstein9666
      @bricefleckenstein9666 Рік тому

      In WoT, the Tog 2 is one of only 2 Tier 6 vehicles I never did a one-shot kill on with a KV2.
      Just too many hit points.
      Never managed it on a T150, just a little too much armor and never got full pen.

  • @dominikmeril1720
    @dominikmeril1720 11 місяців тому

    TUTEL!!!!
    i love how the maus wasnt mentioned. that means mercedes did a good job with it:)

  • @GuniMoo
    @GuniMoo Рік тому +3

    Only OGs remember the green tank destroyer thumbnail

  • @KhyleriSGT
    @KhyleriSGT Рік тому +1

    JagdTiger it was a tank that the allies would not have wanted to face, especially if it was facing them

  • @ProfessorDreamer
    @ProfessorDreamer Рік тому +3

    Simple History can you do a Simple History video on Fulgencio Batista and his presidency in Cuba.

  • @brandonwilde8988
    @brandonwilde8988 Рік тому +1

    0:16 describes what you will encounter after posting memes in General

  • @madgavin7568
    @madgavin7568 Рік тому +2

    No idea why you included the 44M Tas when it wasn't even that heavy and was a promising tank design from a minor country, but left out the much more famous Maus super-heavy tank which was the epitome of a 'useless, overweight tank'.

    • @victory7999
      @victory7999 Місяць тому +1

      Exactly, in fact the 44M Tas was an incredibly capable tank design for any country, let alone for a minor power. I think they went off topic with some of these tanks, and then forgot to talk about useless overweight tanks like the Maus, E-100, O-I, T28/T95, IS-7, etc.

  • @jmar1973
    @jmar1973 Рік тому

    @1:58 R.I.P. To that factory worker! 🏭 👷🏻

  • @bendeguzmatekovacs6615
    @bendeguzmatekovacs6615 Рік тому +2

    Just some help with Hungarian: Rohamlöveg literaly means assault gun, so it can be translated as Tas assault gun. Great video btw.

  • @TheGreyGhost873
    @TheGreyGhost873 Рік тому +6

    So what about the maus and the American superheavy?

  • @frankangelino6058
    @frankangelino6058 Рік тому +1

    Huh, I didn't know that the Germans tried to mount an old Austro-Hungarian Skoda 30.5cm mortar on a tank

  • @ethanwashington60
    @ethanwashington60 Рік тому +1

    Do videos on the comparison of Churchill, Matilda, Crusader and Cromwell vs Sherman/Pershing please!!

  • @Mexican00b
    @Mexican00b Рік тому

    imagine a 100 ton tank nowadays being done by 1 drone of about 5-10kg weight... hehehehhehehehe

  • @armouredarchives8867
    @armouredarchives8867 Рік тому

    No, TOG did not have a 17pdr cannon. And NO tog was not designed for 'WW1'-style trench crossings.

  • @bricefleckenstein9666
    @bricefleckenstein9666 Рік тому

    1:19
    There is evidence that at least one Maus participated in at least one battle on the Eastern Front before being disabled.
    188 tons is a LOT more than 71 tons.
    The Jag is probably the heaviest land combat vehicle to enter serial production AND see combat though.

  • @StevenBaer-zv6lq
    @StevenBaer-zv6lq 7 місяців тому +1

    Soviet Union came out with a hopping tank that seems to bounce forward. Never seen any action? Russian military came up with the strangest and weird tank of the First World War. It's actually had a gigantic, huge front wheel called Tsar Tank, it never saw any action. The front wheel was supposed to knock over trees, it's actually still there today.

  • @dominicbrothers
    @dominicbrothers Рік тому

    Holy crap, thats what our beloved narrator looks like! Awesome :D

  • @XanderFields
    @XanderFields 9 місяців тому

    seeing the desert pink tank made me want to watch sao alt again

  • @EnragedPilgrim
    @EnragedPilgrim Рік тому +1

    "And even the dreaded rubber duck of doom, Just kidding! It's a nuclear bomb."
    Simple History 2024~

  • @necronticgaming6186
    @necronticgaming6186 6 місяців тому

    The german industrial complex:how big are the tank design that you what?
    Hitler: yes.

  • @Hyde_Hill
    @Hyde_Hill Рік тому +2

    Not sure why the Hungarian tank was deemed as useless. As the Panther was okay and if it was similar it could have performed well if it was eventually constructed.

    • @victory7999
      @victory7999 Місяць тому +2

      Yeah exactly, not sure why they consider a 36.6/38 ton relatively effective design to be "overweight and useless", but I don't think they stuck to the title because they missed out some real behemoths.

  • @fahrradmittelfranken8207
    @fahrradmittelfranken8207 Рік тому +5

    How is thee 44M "useless and overweight", it sounded like a feasible project with a reasonably strong gun.

    • @Justin-rv7oy
      @Justin-rv7oy 10 місяців тому +1

      Agree 💯

    • @troygroomes104
      @troygroomes104 10 місяців тому

      There were 2 projects with the name 44m

    • @fahrradmittelfranken8207
      @fahrradmittelfranken8207 10 місяців тому

      @@troygroomes104 the one in the video obviously

    • @troygroomes104
      @troygroomes104 10 місяців тому

      @fahrradmittelfranken8207 both 44m projects were actually heavier than mentioned

    • @MAG_Doger
      @MAG_Doger 2 місяці тому

      I saw your comment exactly when the video mentioned it

  • @izumishion6267
    @izumishion6267 Рік тому +6

    Interesting you didn't include the Japanese O-I Super Heavy Tank or the American T28/T95 Super Heavy Tank.

    • @Random_merkava_enjoyer
      @Random_merkava_enjoyer Рік тому +1

      Not much is known about the o-i since the supposed prototype is nowhere to be seen

    • @Teh0X
      @Teh0X Рік тому +2

      @@Random_merkava_enjoyer The blueprints and test drive documents exist, but WoT, numerous model builders and "what if historians" have spread so much misinformation that people think the whole vehicle didn't exist.

  • @ultrajd
    @ultrajd 10 місяців тому

    The JT was a terrible idea.
    The SPG Tiger might’ve worked. But unlikely.
    The TOG II is an interesting beast. You could practically live in the thing.

  • @hollismccray3297
    @hollismccray3297 8 днів тому

    I'm surprised you didn't mention the T28 super-heavy tank. It was the biggest US tank built during WW2, topping the scales at 95 tons. Similar to the Tortoise, it was built to breach the SIgfried line. And similarly to the Tortoise, by the time it was ready the Sigfried line had already been breached. One example survives, having been misplaced by the US Army for decades.

  • @falsum6913
    @falsum6913 10 місяців тому

    I grew up in Kirkcudbright I’ve seen the wreck of the A39 Tortoise

  • @SlesinowyMikol
    @SlesinowyMikol Рік тому

    i like how the tog in the thumbnail is just shooting itself

  • @G_MaxX
    @G_MaxX 9 місяців тому

    7:58 who else spotted the German gunner firing at that tank covering his eyes with a blindfold.

  • @GotiCsatorna
    @GotiCsatorna 11 місяців тому

    Thank you Simple History, for you remember a hungarian tank.

  • @warlordshaxx856
    @warlordshaxx856 Рік тому +4

    1:58, i wondered if tanks as heavy as the Jagdtiger would fall of the cranes during transport and uhh the tank just fell on him

  • @auo2365
    @auo2365 Рік тому

    Dayum the t-28/t-95 super heavy tank didn’t make it onto this video list.

  • @matthewwilson5548
    @matthewwilson5548 Рік тому

    awesome, again learning something new from the experts at Simple History

  • @mistermango8224
    @mistermango8224 Рік тому +1

    im surprised the t95 didnt make it on this list

  • @tidepoolclipper8657
    @tidepoolclipper8657 Рік тому

    A ship version of the list needs to be made.
    Aside from the very obvious ones, there are a few others to mention;
    those being CV-7 Wasp, Tirpitz, and Shinano.
    Hard to say if the unbuilt finalized version of the iceberg ship would've been useless or overweight. However, a smaller prototype was constructed and they knew of no way to protect it from the summer heat. Though the prototype lasted longer than you'd think.

  • @aleksandarvil5718
    @aleksandarvil5718 Рік тому

    Bob Semple Tank ( New Zealand ) :
    *"AMATEURS !!!"*

  • @warcriminalkurt
    @warcriminalkurt 29 днів тому +3

    Fat shaming tanks is crazy

  • @Cloie_or_ColeVicious
    @Cloie_or_ColeVicious Рік тому +7

    YESSSS 0:01!

  • @micahistory
    @micahistory Рік тому +1

    last time I was this early tanks didn't exist

  • @thewildtoledo3642
    @thewildtoledo3642 Рік тому +1

    Surprised you didn't add the T28/T95 to this list.

  • @SubaruPieter
    @SubaruPieter 11 місяців тому

    I do love the JagdTiger though. My favourite WW2 tank(destroyer)