If You Don't Understand Quantum Physics, Try This!

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 17 тра 2024
  • A simple and clear explanation of all the important features of quantum physics that you need to know. Check out this video's sponsor brilliant.org/dos
    I have spent a lot of time thinking about how best to explain quantum physics and this is the result of all my hours of pondering, and I’m really happy with how it turned out. I decided to just explain it as it actually is, rather than rely on analogies. The video explains the quantum wavefunction, particle-wave duality, the measurement problem, the double-slit experiment, superposition, entanglement, quantum tunnelling, the Heisenberg uncertainty principle, and energy quantisation. Let me know if it was helpful! Cheers Dx
    #quantum #physics #DomainOfScience
    You can get the posters and other merch here:
    store.dftba.com/collections/d...
    Or posters for outside the US here:
    www.redbubble.com/people/domi...
    I have also made versions available for educational use which you can find here: www.flickr.com/photos/9586967...
    If you want to check out my Professor Astro Cat books go here:
    profastrocat.com
    Thanks so much to my supporters on Patreon. If you enjoy my videos and would like to help me make more this is the best way and I appreciate it very much. / domainofscience
    Further reading
    For a more detailed introduction to quantum physics: 'The Quantum Universe' by Brian Cox and Jeff Forshaw is good.
    And a slightly more advanced but fantastic description of what we do and don't know about quantum physics is the excellent book 'Beyond Weird' by Philip Ball.
    Music by
    Dominic ‘Wibblyfingers’ Walliman
    Find me on twitter, instagram, and my website:
    dominicwalliman.com
    / dominicwalliman
    / dominicwalliman
    / domainofscience
    / domainofscience
  • Наука та технологія

КОМЕНТАРІ • 8 тис.

  • @mauriceupton1474
    @mauriceupton1474 5 років тому +12212

    The more I learn, the less I know!

  • @ryanhong3278
    @ryanhong3278 4 роки тому +3665

    Before video: What is quantum physics?
    After: So what is quantum physics?

    • @talonabuser1064
      @talonabuser1064 4 роки тому +122

      Who is quantum physics

    • @kierangale9891
      @kierangale9891 4 роки тому +315

      They are always asking 'What is quantum physics?' but never 'How is quantum physics?'

    • @supie5063
      @supie5063 3 роки тому +10

      Lmfa fr fr

    • @Ndektete
      @Ndektete 3 роки тому +128

      @@kierangale9891 I'll do you one better.
      "Why is quantum physics?"

    • @darkojehu
      @darkojehu 3 роки тому +28

      It’s like shooting a paintball gun and nobody knowing mathematically the probabilities of the paint balls going through wall gaps 4:40

  • @Jorjia7
    @Jorjia7 Рік тому +186

    I’m 13 years old so I’m pretty proud of myself that I understood around half of this. Physics in general has always interested me and recently quantum physics.

    • @marta5sings
      @marta5sings Рік тому +14

      Good for you! Knowledge is gold.

    • @itzvader5560
      @itzvader5560 Рік тому +4

      Me too

    • @zzzbladepookie
      @zzzbladepookie 3 місяці тому +4

      Same situation here !! :)) Glad you can also understand and a person as young as you is also interested in these. Not alone.

    • @DarthVader9809
      @DarthVader9809 3 місяці тому +4

      That's great for you! I'm 14 and wanted to learn more about the quantum realm, so it is super nice to now I'm not alone.

    • @DarthVader9809
      @DarthVader9809 3 місяці тому +1

      @@zzzbladepookie Yay another one! Glad to know that other young people are interesting in quantum mechanics.

  • @500suren
    @500suren Рік тому +31

    "Quantum physics is incredibly accurate but it is also got giant (understated) holes" that sums up the puzzle of quantum mechanics we humans haven't even scratched the tip - a very long way to go in a fascinating journey.

  • @cskinner0129
    @cskinner0129 3 роки тому +3500

    I used to wonder what my dog thought while watching television.

    • @user-kx5es4kr4x
      @user-kx5es4kr4x 3 роки тому +236

      Dogs have a faster kind of shutter speed on their eyes, 70-80. So TV will be low fps for them. Also they can only see shades of blue yellow and grey

    • @henryhamernik4794
      @henryhamernik4794 3 роки тому +72

      @@user-kx5es4kr4x it was a joke

    • @audriam.3878
      @audriam.3878 3 роки тому +132

      @@user-kx5es4kr4xYo, That's cool! I knew about dog's color vision but not about the low fps.

    • @cottardremy7814
      @cottardremy7814 3 роки тому +19

      I got the joke bro ... thing had me dead

    • @ivotenotocensorship5247
      @ivotenotocensorship5247 3 роки тому +41

      @@user-kx5es4kr4x awesome, thanks for teaching us something new

  • @deeprecce9852
    @deeprecce9852 4 роки тому +984

    My Professor says it fine if we do not fully understand the Quantum Theory, but he confused me further when gave me a fail for my final exam!!

    • @waynelivingston1032
      @waynelivingston1032 4 роки тому +21

      Best laugh all day. Thanks

    • @ilt4761
      @ilt4761 4 роки тому +6

      😁😁😁

    • @VI-nner
      @VI-nner 4 роки тому +5

      its treason then

    • @yaynative
      @yaynative 4 роки тому +5

      That means it's fine that you failed 🤷‍♂️

    • @sonis.8491
      @sonis.8491 4 роки тому

      😂😂😂

  • @JobForAMaxboy
    @JobForAMaxboy 2 роки тому +146

    After spending all morning reading different articles and finally getting to grips with the ideas quantum physics puts forward, this video was the perfect way to summarise everything I've learned and put it into objectively understandable terms. Great work, thanks! My brain feels bigger today

    • @zipsteri
      @zipsteri Рік тому +4

      Because we didn't get even a tiny bit of it. It's all mathematical abstractions. When you touch a tree in the forest, you're not touching the tree, but a mathematical abstraction.

    • @ThijmenTheTurkey
      @ThijmenTheTurkey 9 місяців тому +3

      @@zipsteriYou’re not actually touching anything. The “feeling” of that tree is just the opposite electrical forces of your hand and tree repelling each other

  • @mattweston1994
    @mattweston1994 Рік тому +28

    I don't really know why I find myself here, I'm just some random fifteen year old with pretty poor grades who was originally looking for photonics videos, but I must say this was pretty well put together and I actually had some fun with this, I found it pretty easy to keep up with and get what I feel is a decent general understanding of the information displayed. All in all nice video, thank you.

    • @AreEnTee
      @AreEnTee Рік тому +5

      Future quantum physicist?

    • @HemiBurns
      @HemiBurns 5 місяців тому

      If you can follow this at 15 you can do anything young man!

    • @elizabethmartin6364
      @elizabethmartin6364 3 місяці тому +1

      As a retired math teacher, may I say I'm impressed with your inquisitive mind. You'll do well with that kind of interest and you are smarter than you have been led to believe.

    • @kimberlybrown6397
      @kimberlybrown6397 2 місяці тому

      Great job, Matt Weston! Love your curiosity!!

  • @9Ballr
    @9Ballr 3 роки тому +3819

    I'm still waiting for the part where I understand quantum physics.

  • @nightfury8177
    @nightfury8177 4 роки тому +2774

    I understand quantum physics because I don't think I understand quantum physics
    Haters will deny.

    • @nasekiller
      @nasekiller 4 роки тому +72

      thats a good thing, cause you clearly did not understand logic.

    • @lawshorizon
      @lawshorizon 4 роки тому +75

      The more we know the more we know we don't know.

    • @CarDusanGospodarSveta
      @CarDusanGospodarSveta 4 роки тому +9

      *MIND B L O W N*

    • @jorgeskts
      @jorgeskts 4 роки тому +6

      i understand rick and morty suck on cheesy toes bitches

    • @chocobochick5390
      @chocobochick5390 4 роки тому +4

      @@nasekiller boi

  • @macquenlyacabal8091
    @macquenlyacabal8091 Рік тому +49

    The picture summary at the end was very helpful, it summed up all the concepts that were discussed. Keep up the great job and don't forget the picture summary at the end.

  • @CatManDoSocial
    @CatManDoSocial Рік тому +22

    Physics has always been a distant mystery for me but I really love this channel, as well as Minute Physics, and I've learned so much. That said, Quantum Physics can seem to be what Science would be if it could take hallucinogenics. So I really appreciate your honest and realistic perspective on the subject. Thanks for all the great material!

  • @sweetdurt2143
    @sweetdurt2143 4 роки тому +5155

    Electron: waving
    Me: observing it
    Electron: well now I'm not doing it
    EDIT: Lmao this comment is getting attention years after making them lmao

  • @jazzyboy756
    @jazzyboy756 3 роки тому +3538

    I never graduated high school and never cared for science or math but strangely I find the idea of quantum physics super interesting and it’s given me a new appreciation for educating myself
    Edit: got my GED a year ago/
    Going to welders school and set myself up for college classes starting next year to get my associates.

  • @liamtolkkinen5025
    @liamtolkkinen5025 Рік тому +19

    the visualization that you gave for the wave uncertainty principle made it click in my head! Thank you!

  • @LuisGonzalez-ov8fs
    @LuisGonzalez-ov8fs Рік тому +6

    He literally gave closure to a physics course I completed in months ago, but still didn't quiet get all the basics confidently. This made it complete.

  • @gabe8168
    @gabe8168 4 роки тому +1934

    This is the wave of my understanding: ____________

  • @bendtsen1
    @bendtsen1 5 років тому +1391

    Better quote: "If quantum mechanics hasn't profoundly shocked you, you haven't understood it yet." - Niels Bohr

    • @your_dad_18
      @your_dad_18 4 роки тому +12

      Delta change in his quote is larger than normal, so quote rejected.
      Try to minimize the error % and try again

    • @jesterrbtw7953
      @jesterrbtw7953 4 роки тому +1

      Jay Wizard that’s possible but the probability of that kind of power source on our planet would most likely only be from the core but that would cause a lot of geological changes

    • @paxsmile
      @paxsmile 4 роки тому +18

      It profoundly shocked me but I’ve yet to understand it 😳

    • @seanwickham8905
      @seanwickham8905 4 роки тому +2

      @@darkworld5540 Somebody liked watching "Fringe."

    • @marcusx60
      @marcusx60 4 роки тому +8

      “Those who are not shocked when they first come across quantum theory cannot possibly have understood it.”
      ― Niels Bohr, Essays 1932-1957 on Atomic Physics and Human Knowledge

  • @invadernate3985
    @invadernate3985 Рік тому +6

    Had a dream I should look up quantum physics, I never really got into science or math. I’m a mainly history guy but I find this video and found it fascinating.

  • @ErikBongers
    @ErikBongers 8 місяців тому +1

    The choices you made in simplifying this are excellent. There seems to be a growing awareness amongst quantum physics teachers that the typical introductory analogies are causing more confusion than anything else.
    You've even managed to effortlessly explain the measurement problem in an introduction, in a way that would make anyone nod in agreement.

  • @USDOTATF
    @USDOTATF 3 роки тому +3021

    Let me explain Quantum Physics. Imagine a person dancing in your peripheral vision, they dance and keep dancing but when you finally look at them they are still as a statue.

    • @ultimatekunochi6577
      @ultimatekunochi6577 3 роки тому +270

      That sounds like the weeping angels in doctor who!

    • @plumcvnt1937
      @plumcvnt1937 3 роки тому +155

      Nah now I truly believe we live in matrix

    • @carlitovelazquez850
      @carlitovelazquez850 3 роки тому +119

      Feel like that when I'm high

    • @joserferrandis2623
      @joserferrandis2623 3 роки тому +99

      You're absolute right. We can imagine how it work but we can't proof it. In the end nothing coming to reality

    • @sudhanshu2802
      @sudhanshu2802 3 роки тому +10

      @@plumcvnt1937 and the world beyond the matrix is working on quantum right?

  • @only_your_soul_is_real6104
    @only_your_soul_is_real6104 5 років тому +2445

    "Quantum Mechanics is well understood"
    2 minutes later
    "Physicists still can't explain how..."

    • @domainofscience
      @domainofscience  5 років тому +153

      lol yeah! But I stand by that. We'll never understand all of science completely.

    • @only_your_soul_is_real6104
      @only_your_soul_is_real6104 5 років тому +22

      @@domainofscience I agree but we can adopt better models. Virtual Reality Hypothesis 👌

    • @realcygnus
      @realcygnus 5 років тому +2

      @@only_your_soul_is_real6104 I'm a big fan of Digital Physics/VR models(& the more purely idealistic the flavor the better imo). But regardless of the flavor, such models at large seem to connect the most dots(by FAR), from BOTH classical physics & QM. & I'd say it is TRUE that the rather simple concept of "rendering" is a MUCH more "sensible"(NOT that it has to be) explanation of the measurement problem than say an infinite # of imaginary universes(but at least they're "physical" or would be if it wasn't so absurd)lol. One perceived "issue" is that without specific mechanisms and/or something else to back that aspect up, it really doesn't say much more than "the Copenhagen" as is. & Ironically(sort of) if true, not being able to say much about the rendering process, is exactly how it would have to be. We need to explore the hell out of such ideas. It's definitely gained(& still is) considerable momentum over the past decade or so. Its like clearly a solid kernel/shell of an actual TOE to fans & simultaneously like an ultimate conspiracy theory to non fans.

    • @bradbadley1
      @bradbadley1 5 років тому +12

      @@domainofscience Scientist found a mathematical model that fits the behavior to a very high degree. But they(we) don't really understand how or why it behaves the way it does. Especially in any intuitive way that can be explained by a simple analogy. fair?

    • @only_your_soul_is_real6104
      @only_your_soul_is_real6104 5 років тому +2

      @@realcygnus I think I know you from the comment section of a certain big toed physicist named Tom.

  • @davidhutchins8144
    @davidhutchins8144 9 місяців тому +4

    I have read several books which attempt to explain quantum mechanics, but until watching this I have never gained a more clear understanding of the concepts. The description of the uncertainty principle I thought was particularly concise and easy to understand. Bravo!

    • @lepidoptera9337
      @lepidoptera9337 8 місяців тому

      Ouch. The uncertainty principle has nothing to do with quantum mechanics. It's a purely classical fact about linear systems. ;-)

    • @kinggrimm4338
      @kinggrimm4338 Місяць тому

      You haven't read the right books. Read anything from Mike Hockney, Jack Tanner, Dr. Thomas Stark, Harry Knox.

  • @LoudGuitarSounds
    @LoudGuitarSounds Рік тому +27

    I play guitar and am very passionate about audio engineering. I also worked as a general contractor with good knowledge in electrical.
    Applying both my sound wave knowledge and electrical current knowledge. This actually all made so much sense and was so fun to learn, I am looking at going back to school.
    I truly have to thank you. This was life changing.

  • @tA-ts1hw
    @tA-ts1hw 4 роки тому +3051

    so, according to this video we are literally made of vibes

    • @Andre-sb9zm
      @Andre-sb9zm 4 роки тому +51

      Yes man!!!!

    • @Andre-sb9zm
      @Andre-sb9zm 4 роки тому +194

      Literally! Its not just a coicidence people talk about good or bad vibes, everything is literal vibration

    • @MyVlogTubes
      @MyVlogTubes 4 роки тому +22

      If you want to understand how we are like signals and quentom physics see how 3d games are made.

    • @adamfirst3772
      @adamfirst3772 4 роки тому +20

      MyVlogtubes
      3D games... or ANY software... REQUIRES Hardware... and by extension, Programmers, Software and Hardware ENGINEERS..... and Technology and Knowledge...
      most importantly, it requires Desire, Will and Ability!!!
      "scientists " claim its all random, accidental and coincidental!!!

    • @KibyNykraft
      @KibyNykraft 4 роки тому +8

      Vibratory states of cosmic energy = the basic structure of all reality like light ,matter and potentially metaphysical conditions like dark energy etc

  • @monsieur.Chipmunk
    @monsieur.Chipmunk 3 роки тому +320

    Electron is me in a nutshell. I work. When someone watches. I stop.

    • @GUCC1197
      @GUCC1197 3 роки тому +11

      That’s me in reverse, I sit watch tv, my husband walks in I’m stood ironing.

    • @aduts1177
      @aduts1177 3 роки тому +11

      so,particles are introvert?

    • @dinomra7771
      @dinomra7771 2 роки тому +5

      @@aduts1177 So that's why I'm an introvert! I'm made of them!

    • @tuckergary1516
      @tuckergary1516 2 роки тому

      I've been invisabe for years.

    • @dinomra7771
      @dinomra7771 2 роки тому

      @@tuckergary1516 oof dude.

  • @NalitaQubit
    @NalitaQubit Рік тому +12

    This is really cool! Thank you for posting. Would you kindly make a detailed video on quantum entanglement specifically? It’s such a mind blowing phenomenon! For some reason it leads me to believe that the same happens amongst close individuals.

  • @romanfischer2196
    @romanfischer2196 9 місяців тому +1

    Incredible animation and general production quality! Very well done!

  • @sambaza2_254
    @sambaza2_254 4 роки тому +619

    Well, that confirms it. I'm as dumb as I thought.

    • @neilcates3499
      @neilcates3499 4 роки тому +26

      At least your not alone.

    • @Remiii0
      @Remiii0 4 роки тому +15

      Eh, no one is stupid unless they believe they are stupid. The rest are ignorant.

    • @korykent5645
      @korykent5645 4 роки тому +5

      Agreed. None of this made sense to me 😭

    • @yarpen26
      @yarpen26 4 роки тому +20

      You're not dumb, it's just that the video isn't that good at explaining quantum physics. It should have stopped around the 5:10 mark and then use the remaining time to make sure the audiences fully grasped just the idea that what we understand to be just these tiny particles might actually be something else entirely. That's already a ton to swallow but the video keeps on going. Seriously, has anyone who never studied QPh actually followed it all the way through?
      I've seen it happen many times before: someone who's well familiar with the topic begins an introductory video in a very user-friendly manner but within the matter of minutes he completely loses the notion of teaching the uninitiated. He answers questions the audiences didn't even think to ask ("We don't care if it's called superposition, we don't even understand what the damn phenomenon is supposed to be, I mean, is it like atomic binding or something...?) but doesn't answer those they would in fact pose ("Wait, if the electron can either be here or there, why would we say it might be at two places at the same time? It's clearly just at one!").

    • @preacherzay
      @preacherzay 4 роки тому +22

      The fact that you watched this video shows that you crave intelligence and have a passion for learning. Therefore, you’re not dumb. Dumb are those who think they are intelligent and don’t want to learn anything more than they already know.

  • @MINDucated
    @MINDucated 3 роки тому +1296

    "If you want to understand the universe, think of energy, frequency and vibration" - Nikola Tesla

    • @joserferrandis2623
      @joserferrandis2623 3 роки тому +27

      Forget magnetism and gravitation

    • @wissewester1276
      @wissewester1276 3 роки тому +18

      When you understand the universe you Dont. If you did you wouldnt want to understand. Immagine Everyone youve ever loved could exist yet not Exist at the same time you can be GOD of the universe yet completely alone or 100% replacable and together. Trust me dude you dont want to know.

    • @johndevine6687
      @johndevine6687 3 роки тому +2

      Tesla was truly an A-hole. He was at sea. There is a very good reason I say that. That's all I have to say.

    • @Elshulife
      @Elshulife 3 роки тому +4

      and 369

    • @ad1376
      @ad1376 3 роки тому +1

      If Tesla was a a hole what does make me or especially u

  • @Stinckyfatmama
    @Stinckyfatmama Рік тому +4

    Thank you so much for the visual analogies, as a hands on learner it’s really difficult to conceptualize these concepts.

  • @checallo
    @checallo 4 місяці тому +2

    I want to compliment you for the best explanation I've ever seen for non-experts like me. I could go a step further grabbing fundamental concepts about the matter, also thanks to the clarity, apt analogies and balance between simplicity and details. Many compliments!

  • @anishtiwari1121
    @anishtiwari1121 5 років тому +482

    There is a high probability I haven't understood this

  • @cassiusfiorill5618
    @cassiusfiorill5618 3 роки тому +1208

    Nobody:
    Me at 3AM:hmmm I wonder about quantum physics

  • @besreal3419
    @besreal3419 Рік тому +5

    The movement of the particle (any particle) moves around like a wave. Just like a molecule of H20 moves around in the ocean or lake, like a wave. Taken together, the particles move together in waves. If we stop a particle while it is jumping all around and ask it "where are you now" it gives us an answer we call measurement because we measured EXACTLY where it is this instant. But it keeps moving, so the probability is that it is probably here or there or somewhere at any given moment in time. It's the same with Waldo, in where is Waldo. We can certainly predict Waldo will need to use the restroom. So the probability of catching Waldo in the loo is pretty high, compared to other places.

  • @thefrenchguard6999
    @thefrenchguard6999 11 місяців тому +3

    This video cleared up a lot for me. Ive read over 100 popular physics books and this is what made things most clear for me.

  • @Cello69.
    @Cello69. 4 роки тому +800

    I’ve watched countless hours of quantum Mechanics videos. I mean embarrassing amount of hours and it never sunk in. I actually consider myself to be relatively intelligent but there’s something about the whole the thing that really bothered me. With that being said this video is by far the best explanation I’ve ever seen. A few but very important key things was said that tied things together.
    Thank you video maker, publisher, and poster. 😀

    • @domainofscience
      @domainofscience  4 роки тому +97

      Ah that's such a nice comment, thanks! And glad it finally clicked for you. :D

    • @dakotaa.7100
      @dakotaa.7100 3 роки тому +9

      Domain of Science
      Yasss! I love science and found this vid randomly, clicked it, watched it and didn’t regret ^w^

    • @gaetangrange1517
      @gaetangrange1517 3 роки тому +9

      @@dakotaa.7100 wow I'm surprised I've been looking at several videos over the past weeks and this is by far the best, consider yourself lucky to have found it randomly. Whereas I have been searching for a video like this for quite some time.

    • @gaetangrange1517
      @gaetangrange1517 3 роки тому +2

      @M Alves You took the words right out of my fingers. 😀

    • @henryfdc
      @henryfdc 3 роки тому +2

      @@domainofscience cool vid bruh. Seems like you as smart as einstein.

  • @APO1029
    @APO1029 5 років тому +1971

    "I dunno lol probably" - Quantum Physicists

    • @amisus1
      @amisus1 5 років тому +21

      Our brains need more power to process so many unknowns spontaneously and thus we must have new methods & materials to enhance its functions.

    • @bicholouco1281
      @bicholouco1281 5 років тому +69

      "Something to do with maths, idk, who gives a shit" - actual quote from einstein

    • @mrssrm5053
      @mrssrm5053 5 років тому +4

      @@bicholouco1281 Bob Einstein my postman?

    • @bicholouco1281
      @bicholouco1281 5 років тому

      @@mrssrm5053 whats the difference we all scared and clueless

    • @mrssrm5053
      @mrssrm5053 5 років тому +6

      @@bicholouco1281 yes. yes we all are, unless there is good wine and cakes and roast lamb; fragrant buds to smoke and salsa music playing very loud. Then. Then we are happy.

  • @Homemmtbrasa
    @Homemmtbrasa Рік тому +2

    Great video. I'm glad he explained it plainly without metaphors. Most people "explaining" quantum physics immediately go "imagine you have a fried egg" or some crap like that which just makes it more confusing and probably means they don't really know what they're talking about.

  • @Commentewr
    @Commentewr 9 місяців тому +2

    he explained heisenberg's uncertainty principle with ease

  • @DyslexicMitochondria
    @DyslexicMitochondria 5 років тому +2873

    Heisenberg and Schrödinger get pulled over for speeding.
    The cop asks Heisenberg "Do you know how fast you were going?"
    Heisenberg replies, "No, but we know exactly where we are!"
    The officer looks at him confused and says "you were going 108 miles per hour!"
    Heisenberg throws his arms up and cries, "Great! Now we're lost!"
    The officer looks over the car and asks Schrödinger if the two men have anything in the trunk.
    "A cat," Schrödinger replies.
    The cop opens the trunk and yells "Hey! This cat is dead."
    Schrödinger angrily replies, "Well he is now."
    EDIT : I've also started a science channel about everyday's common phenomenons.

    • @gexxon917
      @gexxon917 5 років тому +188

      And Ohm resisted the arrest when they got pulled over

    • @quantumsoul3495
      @quantumsoul3495 5 років тому +85

      Use km/h

    • @f3ynman1um8
      @f3ynman1um8 5 років тому +19

      Minechaîne Antoinecraft no

    • @cancel1913
      @cancel1913 5 років тому +18

      @@quantumsoul3495 Can't you see he did not want to? Otherwise he would have. After all, he authored his own comment. Not you.

    • @quantumsoul3495
      @quantumsoul3495 5 років тому +12

      @@cancel1913 Waw

  • @TerryUniGeezerPeterson
    @TerryUniGeezerPeterson 5 років тому +480

    I have a Quantum mechanic who works on my car. Now it drives forward and reverse at the same time.

    • @Nobilangelo
      @Nobilangelo 5 років тому +50

      Forward on the road and backward in the wallet...

    • @ShaolinChan5988
      @ShaolinChan5988 5 років тому +4

      😂🤣😄😂🤣😄😂🤣😄😄😄💐

    • @MultiTomatojuice
      @MultiTomatojuice 4 роки тому +22

      I have a quantum mechanic who works on me. Now I can be at school and in bed at the same time

    • @caitlynj7466
      @caitlynj7466 4 роки тому +1

      Ok, you win

    • @lawshorizon
      @lawshorizon 4 роки тому +5

      You only think you have "one" car but, obviously, you have "two" with one driving forward and one driving backward at the same time. ... You also have a past and a future at the same time.

  • @HawthorneHillNaturePreserve
    @HawthorneHillNaturePreserve 2 роки тому +5

    This was an awesome basic presentation. At first I thought I didn’t want to see it but I’m so glad I Watched it.

  • @frikishaan
    @frikishaan Рік тому +5

    There is a probability that in other universe I know quantum physics.

  • @ruper0
    @ruper0 4 роки тому +440

    I aint going to sleep until i understand 1% of this

  • @tsukariiyt5675
    @tsukariiyt5675 4 роки тому +181

    my friend went down the “try to understand quantum physics” hole and she pulled me down with her

  • @woxinling
    @woxinling Рік тому +5

    quantum physics is part of our curriculum for next year so I really enjoyed looking into it ahead of time with this video! wish me luck for next year, i'm still going to need a lot of that

  • @noxali_dev8176
    @noxali_dev8176 Рік тому +3

    OMG i finally understand the linked particles thing !!!! Sometimes explaining it a little more in detail help people understand! thank you so much. Even though it is very simple I known

  • @staniclol7063
    @staniclol7063 3 роки тому +2018

    I watched Avengers Endgame so I’m pretty sure I know how Quantum physics work.

    • @jn5602
      @jn5602 3 роки тому +31

      Hahaha Sheldon Cooper schooled us too in “TBBT”

    • @urgoofylightningboy5146
      @urgoofylightningboy5146 3 роки тому +57

      Endgame didn’t give u a big learning experience it was just a group of big words they jumbled up and called it quantum physics

    • @charlaynentemar155
      @charlaynentemar155 3 роки тому +13

      I watched endgame like three or four times already and I do not fully understand Quantum Physics 💀

    • @charlaynentemar155
      @charlaynentemar155 3 роки тому +1

      @@urgoofylightningboy5146 exactly

    • @staniclol7063
      @staniclol7063 3 роки тому +1

      @@charlaynentemar155 I understand why 😂

  • @babyrazor6887
    @babyrazor6887 4 роки тому +395

    The aliens in their fly by scene: "Oh look! isn't that sooo cute!! Their doing that old quantum physics thing!"

  • @zacharydavis4398
    @zacharydavis4398 2 роки тому +3

    Thanks for spending the time to create and share this content 🤙🏾

  • @stevebourne9387
    @stevebourne9387 Рік тому +3

    Good clear explanation of this complex subject and you’ve helped me get it clearer in my understanding 😃

  • @w_ssy
    @w_ssy 3 роки тому +503

    This won't resurrect my dead brain cells but at least i kind of learned something

    • @physicsexplorer8163
      @physicsexplorer8163 3 роки тому +3

      Purps 👍🔥🔥🔥

    • @partigianoliberal
      @partigianoliberal 3 роки тому +8

      You create brain cells all the time!

    • @caesium_
      @caesium_ 3 роки тому +2

      i just HAD to like this comment.

    • @35ic
      @35ic 3 роки тому +1

      @@partigianoliberal you can't actually

    • @partigianoliberal
      @partigianoliberal 3 роки тому +2

      @@35ic It's a natural process called neurogenesis.

  • @leonidas6134
    @leonidas6134 4 роки тому +509

    When in doubt, find a video narrated by an English Gentleman.

    • @louf7178
      @louf7178 4 роки тому +7

      I didn't realize they have so many "r" sounds for words not spelled with "r" 😵

    • @adamfirst3772
      @adamfirst3772 4 роки тому +1

      and use big words...
      wrapped in bacon and baloney , topped with lots of spam...
      served with a bottomless side of insult!!
      and no, i dont mean Gordon Ramsay... just Quantum Crap...

    • @jenny-rm3rt
      @jenny-rm3rt 4 роки тому +1

      Lou Fazio wait what

  • @pain16tdn45
    @pain16tdn45 6 місяців тому +3

    As a physics students struggling in the visualization of what I'm doing this is perfect. Really thank you :)

  • @ShivamGupta-sr9zf
    @ShivamGupta-sr9zf Рік тому +2

    This is without a doubt one of the best explanation of quantum physics on UA-cam.

  • @JohnFerrier
    @JohnFerrier 5 років тому +413

    It should be noted that for tunneling, a "barrier" doesn't necessarily mean a wall. Some people may be thinking of the walls in their house. What it means instead is a potential barrier. In other words, a voltage potential difference, or a different energy state.

    • @domainofscience
      @domainofscience  5 років тому +69

      Yes, excellent point. I was thinking of explaining this in the video, but it didn't make the cut.

    • @shrivatsakulkarni9282
      @shrivatsakulkarni9282 5 років тому +1

      But in microprocessor there in actually a wall . What's your take on that?

    • @JohnFerrier
      @JohnFerrier 5 років тому +2

      @@shrivatsakulkarni9282 That's not how that works. Look up Fermi levels.

    • @armpap1
      @armpap1 5 років тому +4

      Which doesn't differ much from the walls in your house. Isn't it just a bunch of atoms in solid state that would repel anything else approaching with electromagnetic force? How is a potential barrier different? Same interaction type, same force, so a valid analogy.

    • @JohnFerrier
      @JohnFerrier 5 років тому +4

      @@armpap1 No. That is a completely different approach that includes a proton and screening effects. That's not applicable to understanding the basic 1D model of tunneling.
      Check out the exchange above. The creator of the video has a PhD in Physics and I'm currently working on my PhD.
      Now, we could look at atoms for tunneling INSIDE the atom. But, it has nothing to do with an actual wall.

  • @christopherbuckton9650
    @christopherbuckton9650 2 роки тому +692

    Thank you. That was an excellent presentation. I'm a retired Physics teacher and have been incredibly frustrated that I could never get my head around quantum mechanics enough to explain to my A level students. I can now finally forgive myself!! Thanks again

    • @lepidoptera9337
      @lepidoptera9337 2 роки тому +14

      How can you forgive yourself for failing your students? :-)

    • @sazaaaam
      @sazaaaam 2 роки тому +58

      @@lepidoptera9337 not all levels of education necessarily need quantum physics, he just said he was a teacher, a physics teacher.

    • @Despin7a77
      @Despin7a77 Рік тому +49

      @@lepidoptera9337 its important to forgive ourselves, be better or stay bitter person.

    • @mattoppenheimer690
      @mattoppenheimer690 Рік тому +25

      @@lepidoptera9337sometimes you just have to consider the possibility to shut up, my friend

    • @lepidoptera9337
      @lepidoptera9337 Рік тому +1

      @@mattoppenheimer690 You are clearly not listening to your own advice. ;-)

  • @Fuck_YT
    @Fuck_YT 2 роки тому +2

    I had a very vague idea of what quantum physics meant, but I understood everything in this video. I love when I learn something and it ties a ton of knowledge up, it feels great.

    • @zipsteri
      @zipsteri Рік тому +1

      So you understand what a wave function is; not a wave , not a particle, but a function, an amplitude squared. Simple and easy?

  • @wings9925
    @wings9925 Рік тому +3

    Thanks for a really clear explanation. I've combined this with watching History Of The Universe channel, to scratch my astrophysics itch

  • @amber1862
    @amber1862 5 років тому +615

    I liked and disliked this video at the same time, it's now down to you Dom.

    • @domainofscience
      @domainofscience  5 років тому +104

      I tried to measure it but all I got was a load of cats!?

    • @josephgiannopoulos9414
      @josephgiannopoulos9414 5 років тому +3

      I would like to pray for the ppl who made this video.. GOD BLESS THESE PEOPLE AND ALL OF YOU . GOD IS GREAT JESUS CHRIST

    • @josephgiannopoulos9414
      @josephgiannopoulos9414 5 років тому

      @Joe Chang hey chang read another book you guys are doing good with that sorry your brain right now is probably mush sorry it's not your fault bad ppl told you the key to everything is found in this HORRIBLE school system. Good luck if you weren't on this chanelle I promise I would have told you but I do not trust you

    • @josephgiannopoulos9414
      @josephgiannopoulos9414 5 років тому

      @Joe Chang what I can say is if you dont believe in God I would find him not about quantum physics. Trust me the man upstairs does not give to shits about you knowing this . He cares how you treat the scientist next to you. That's impress him more GOD BLESS

    • @irtehpwn09
      @irtehpwn09 5 років тому +1

      @@domainofscience
      How do they "observe" which slit the electron goes through? i know its with a measuring device, but what exactly does that entail? is it a stream of photons going past the slit or something and you just measure when there is a break in the stream to determine which slit it went through?
      Also how do we send just 1 electron through the double slit experiment, when ever they say that, they always show a laser beam, which i imagine would be many many electrons in a stream, or do they send a pulse or sumut?
      I was thinking perhaps, electrons travel as a wave but then collapse to a particle when they touch something, however i found an error in that thinking, because if that were true, the wave should collapse when it touches the double slits.
      I would appreciate any input and thanks for the video. Also others feel free to add your input.

  • @julietserpentin1491
    @julietserpentin1491 3 роки тому +138

    I don't come from a science background but I've always been fascinated by physics and astronomy. I've tried on and off for years to get my head around this and I think I finally got it! From one teacher to another - congrats and one hell of a thank you

    • @P.a.u.l.ii.n.a
      @P.a.u.l.ii.n.a 2 роки тому +7

      Same! It’s so interesting and it has this cool but unsettling vibe that attracts me to quantum physics, astronomy, etc.

    • @rocky821
      @rocky821 2 роки тому +1

      Eastern spirituality is where you will get answers especially advaita vedanta

    • @ozanmrcan
      @ozanmrcan 2 роки тому

      no you didn't

    • @drawer3174
      @drawer3174 2 роки тому

      lol nerds

  • @petterhflindqvist5962
    @petterhflindqvist5962 Рік тому +3

    Thanks a lot for an engaging way of explaining something I still do not understand, but still find extremely interesting and intriguing:)

  • @ma-lu3088
    @ma-lu3088 9 місяців тому +1

    I think what Richard meant in his quote was; once you understand it, you need to forget it. What is, isn't always. The rules are constantly changing and evolving. Just like the universe is constantly expanding. It's like finding a cure for a dis-ease (disease). Take for example syphilis. There was no cure for syphilis up until mid 20th century. What I am trying to say is; if you are working to solve something. Then what you are working on is not really impossible. It's more possible than you think.

  • @juliocbp9389
    @juliocbp9389 4 роки тому +209

    "If you think you understand quantum mechanics, you don't understand quantum mechanics."
    Looking at you, Deepak Chopra!

  • @meispi9457
    @meispi9457 5 років тому +386

    The Heisenberg uncertainity principle was wonderfully explained!!!

    • @sharank
      @sharank 5 років тому +7

      True. I'd always known what the uncertainty was but never had the intuitive understanding of the uncertainty. Great explanation indeed

    • @agod5608
      @agod5608 5 років тому +6

      I knew nothing and now I am a physicist
      Very good introduction.

    • @eenkjet
      @eenkjet 5 років тому +2

      ? It wasn't explained at all. Go to 3Blue1Brown for an actual explanation.

    • @JaredJeyaretnam
      @JaredJeyaretnam 5 років тому +2

      Finally a proper explanation! The canonical uncertainty principle is, at its heart, a statement about wave mechanics, not quantum mechanics, and you’ve shown that here.
      But then you consider stuff like different spin components and it gets weird!

    • @ewmegoolies
      @ewmegoolies 5 років тому +1

      Yes but doesn't entanglement provide a way to measure one wave and know the properties of the other entangled wave?

  • @hazespo
    @hazespo Рік тому +5

    Ive always had an interest for quantum mechanics. When I was 13 I started my studies with super complicated lectures. 2 years later im back at it but I’ve found it’s easier when I first have a basic idea of it! So thank you for this

  • @rjdwoodtones600
    @rjdwoodtones600 Рік тому +1

    I’ve been investigating Quantum Physics on my own for the past year and this an excellent overview

  • @flying_turtle3893
    @flying_turtle3893 5 років тому +208

    When your supposed to be studying for a bio test but this is more Interesting.

    • @richardcook6505
      @richardcook6505 5 років тому +3

      Flying_turtle !
      Go ahead and edit this again.
      Think, primary school grammar...

    • @ogsupremelyvida
      @ogsupremelyvida 4 роки тому +2

      Lol me but for physics

    • @eperke2933
      @eperke2933 4 роки тому +2

      how did you know? lol

    • @soleus6386
      @soleus6386 4 роки тому +2

      Why is this so relatable? 😂😂😂

    • @reganf.3636
      @reganf.3636 4 роки тому

      This is literally me right now. I have a microbio final tomorrow and its 2 am xD

  • @Scopie
    @Scopie 4 роки тому +255

    I feel so much smarter!
    Even though my grades disagree..

    • @universewithinyou2761
      @universewithinyou2761 4 роки тому +8

      Me too, I love to learn science especially in physics. Indeed, grades doesn't define your intelligence, even Einstein himself hates school because it is stupid

    • @Scopie
      @Scopie 4 роки тому +1

      @Michael Terrell II It was a joke

    • @trout2818
      @trout2818 4 роки тому

      same lmao

    • @emiliap8790
      @emiliap8790 4 роки тому +3

      Dont worry, I get straight A's and Im still a dumb hoe

    • @horacio6537
      @horacio6537 4 роки тому +1

      @@universewithinyou2761 *hated. He's dead

  • @psychicKrystal
    @psychicKrystal Рік тому

    I've been looking for a good video to send my mom that isn't so convoluted. Thank you so much for making these ❤️

  • @carlostescudero3217
    @carlostescudero3217 9 місяців тому +1

    i’m 23 and the last physics class i took was when i was 15. i wish class was like this lesson.

  • @mustaphaItani
    @mustaphaItani 5 років тому +160

    Came here looking for answers. Leaving with more questions :(

  • @kmsnow6292
    @kmsnow6292 4 роки тому +52

    I first thought this was Quantum Physics 101 when I first clicked on it. After 7 mins into the video, I concluded: This is Quantum Physics 10100.

  • @joehayek8798
    @joehayek8798 Рік тому

    One of the best explanations I ever watched and I have watched way too many videos and read quite a bit about Quantum Physics

  • @ranjithkumar-qb9xy
    @ranjithkumar-qb9xy Рік тому +1

    short and crisp video with a ton of details. thank you

  • @minhle1162
    @minhle1162 4 роки тому +259

    Beautiful!!!
    By the way, I just had some atoms for breakfast....

    • @tenor3946
      @tenor3946 4 роки тому +3

      everyone did.particles make up atoms and atoms are almost everything

    • @kevinkassoka8628
      @kevinkassoka8628 4 роки тому +6

      @@tenor3946 woooosh

    • @thelorryist551
      @thelorryist551 4 роки тому +3

      Or did they have you...?

    • @relaxingclouds760
      @relaxingclouds760 3 роки тому +1

      Omg so funny

    • @DD-xt6vo
      @DD-xt6vo 3 роки тому +2

      Minh le Were they drowning or just waving in the milk?

  • @marioyacoub
    @marioyacoub 3 роки тому +61

    “If you think you understand this quote, then you don’t understand this quote” Richard Feynman

  • @2breakfast
    @2breakfast 8 місяців тому

    IIIIII have been DYING in my advanced chemistry course because they want us to learn some quantum mechanics and my brain just doesn’t grasp physics that well. after hours of trying to make sense of it, this is the video that finally made it click!! thank you so much, hopefully i won’t fail my quiz in a few hours lol

  • @abhaykulkarni23
    @abhaykulkarni23 9 місяців тому

    Very sweet overview!! any books you can recommend ?

  • @Rationalific
    @Rationalific 2 роки тому +332

    Wow! I'm extremely impressed with what you fit in to a video that's less than 13 minutes long! This might just be the best ever overview of quantum physics over such a short span of time! And I also like that you made things easy to understand while also giving us lots of great information!

  • @SeriouslyCross
    @SeriouslyCross 5 років тому +28

    As a physics undergrad, this video explained so well concepts that took me weeks to understand through my lectures. Glad it's out there.

  • @fiascally6138
    @fiascally6138 4 місяці тому

    No, like this video is honestly so good. It's perfect. I listened to it a bunch, and this is everything I need to know. You made it very interesting and I'm looking forward to researching it in my own time. And the whole layout was ideal, I cannot recommend it enough. Thank you.

  • @mcwulf25
    @mcwulf25 Рік тому +1

    Probably the best explanation of Heisenberg I have seen. Why isn't it taught in terms of Fourier everywhere?

  • @nyanity
    @nyanity 2 роки тому +158

    This actually did help demystify it! Most analogies out there make it sound like pure magic, but the analogy of waves from a pebble thrown in water + the insights on how measurements are done and what models are used help understand what quantum physics is actually about

    • @yum8666
      @yum8666 4 місяці тому

      It still feels like magic though

  • @tarynaurelia2169
    @tarynaurelia2169 4 роки тому +367

    Me: Doesn’t even know “Quantum”
    Also Me: *Clicks*
    Still Me: WHAT IS THIS

    • @finalboss6973
      @finalboss6973 4 роки тому

      Me too :D

    • @louf7178
      @louf7178 4 роки тому

      They seemed to have changed the meaning. I knew it to be the smallest amount needed to produce the effect - now it just seems to mean some mystical phenomena.

    • @huepjr5606
      @huepjr5606 4 роки тому +6

      @@louf7178 You simply got a misconception, it never changed meaning, quantum phyics is the study of really small objects (particles)

    • @idan7989
      @idan7989 4 роки тому +1

      Also you: stupid

    • @khateguico9263
      @khateguico9263 4 роки тому

      Same

  • @jeffrymichineau4002
    @jeffrymichineau4002 Рік тому +1

    You have done a fantastic job of simplifying this topic..well done..

  • @curiouscatlabincgetsworrie7755

    Spectacular! I followed along all the way and didn't slide through parts I could get later in the re-run haha. Explained this way it all makes sense.

  • @codingphysics695
    @codingphysics695 5 років тому +221

    I think, there are two reasons, why quantum mechanics is hard to unterstand:
    1. The underlying math is quite complicated. For the basic concepts of classical mechanics like velocity and acceleration you only need basic calculus, with is taught at school. But the fundamentals of quantum physics involves much more math, like complex analysis and Hilbert spaces. In order to understand something like the Heisenberg uncertainty principle from the mathematical point of view, you must be at least be familiar with the Fourier transformation.
    2. Quantum mechanics is counterintuitive. The concepts of classical mechanics are closely linked to our everyday experience. The orbital motion of the moon around the earth and the trajectory of an arrow are two aspects of the same thing. But in quantum mechanics we have to abandon intuitive classical concepts like the trajectory and have to replace them with abstract mathematical things like the wave function. Quantum mechanics questions our concept of reality. Physical quantities can be in a state of superposition, so that they are strictly speaking undefined before the measurement. By measuring this physical quantitity, the state of the system is irreversibly changed, simply because of the presence of this information. But without an idea what really going on at a measurement, it is difficult to get an intuitive understanding how quantum mechanics works.
    The solution, perhaps, is to approach quantum mechanics from a completely different angle than described in most textbooks. Instead of a particle in a potential well, one can consider an even simpler system: the qubit. A single qubit can illustrate the concept of superposition. With two qubits you get already entanglement. By learning how quantum computers work one can get an understanding about quantum mechanics even without advanced math. So, the real benefit of quantum computers could be that we use them to better understand quantum mechanics.

    • @User-jr7vf
      @User-jr7vf 5 років тому +4

      I sometimes find myself wondering what math is more difficult, that of theory of Relativity or that of quantum mechanics. I usually end up concluding the latter is more complicated... for differential geometry is all about geometry!

    • @David-km2ie
      @David-km2ie 5 років тому +3

      You seem like you now where you are talking about. Which books would you recommend for a rigorous foundation of quantum. I wanted to try landau and lifshitz 3 volume after have a good basis of GR. Do you have other suggestions?

    • @codingphysics695
      @codingphysics695 5 років тому +6

      @@David-km2ie I own a copy of the Landau-Lifshitz myself and know from experience that learning from this book can be very hard. He explains many things without explicit mathematical calculation, so that much is left to the reader and you have to actively participate. But if you have worked through the entire book, then you probably have mastered quantum mechanics. (But I can only guess, because I never finished it.) If this is not your preferred learning method, then there are alternatives, such as the Cohen-Tannoudji, which I think is a bit more pedagogical.

    • @codingphysics695
      @codingphysics695 5 років тому +5

      @@User-jr7vf It depends how serious you want get into the theory. In principal, even good old Newtonian mechanics gets complicated if it comes to non-linear systems. However, the fundamentals of classical mechanics and special relativity can be illustrated quite nicely without math by thought experiment. But these thought experiments relies on our common sense and our intuition, which fails at unterstanding quantum mechanics. It think, since we are left in the quantum world without the guidance by our intuition, the math appears much more complicated.

    • @Liz-pc3dc
      @Liz-pc3dc 5 років тому

      I'm not sure I'm familiar enough with qubit for it to help me understand better, but thanks anyway for the tip, I'll try and find more info on the qubit.

  • @sophiabradley2055
    @sophiabradley2055 3 роки тому +184

    i’m only 14 but honestly i want to know more. like it’s so interesting to me. my brain hurt bc i watched like 5 other videos today but it’s so worth it. it genuinely makes me want to study this type of stuff in college.

    • @MarkoCloud
      @MarkoCloud 3 роки тому +38

      If it interests you never let anyone tell you that you shouldn't be studying it!

    • @lukakiljac5662
      @lukakiljac5662 3 роки тому +24

      I wish I was interested in this stuff when I was your age, I regret going through school just barely scraping by, studying only enough so I get a pass and then forgeting most of it, and the world is so interesting, sigh... Thinking back on school, there is not one subject that is inherently boring.

    • @lukakiljac5662
      @lukakiljac5662 3 роки тому +11

      I'm 22 btw I'm not old or anything I just feel like there is a lot of catching up I have to do

    • @Hellohiq10
      @Hellohiq10 3 роки тому +1

      Me too lol

    • @robertdecke3158
      @robertdecke3158 3 роки тому +10

      Good on you. don't give up, challenge yourself, and you will go far in life, great to see women taking an interest in science, I'm still freaked out by the twin slit experiment, how do the atoms know we are watching them??

  • @christophjanssen9324
    @christophjanssen9324 Рік тому +1

    Thank you so much! All I could find on the internet was really complicated shtick, as a person without good maths or physics education all the numbers and unexplained variables quickly threw me off - but this helped! In a very concise way even.

  • @emanuelem57
    @emanuelem57 9 місяців тому +1

    Quite understandable synthesis of quantum physics for almost laymen like me who try to understand it a little better. Thanks for the simplification

  • @greattit
    @greattit 5 років тому +124

    That was a great way of explaining the Heisenberg uncertainty principle utilizing the addition of sine waves / fourier transformation.

  • @farialmab4723
    @farialmab4723 4 роки тому +102

    Ted: "All we are, is dust in the wind, dude."

    • @physicsexplorer8163
      @physicsexplorer8163 3 роки тому +1

      Farial Mab 👍

    • @farialmab4723
      @farialmab4723 3 роки тому +2

      @@physicsexplorer8163 *Air guitar * 🎸 "Radical!" 😉 🙂 Thanks 🙂

    • @eBook-eBook
      @eBook-eBook 3 роки тому +2

      Yes! Just a drop of water in an endless sea.
      All we do crumbles to the ground,
      Though we refuse to see. 😁

    • @seacoast4950
      @seacoast4950 3 роки тому +1

      We are spirit and soul too!!

  • @stevencp
    @stevencp Рік тому +1

    I think that when you get down to quantum, you are dealing with another dimension of our universe. we can sense and experience 3+1 (3 dimensions plus time dimension, and they think the universe is 10 or 11 dimensions), which explains things like entanglement over long distances.

  • @Shreyy17
    @Shreyy17 9 місяців тому

    Thanks to your video, I could understand it. I'm in 12th grade and our books don't have any explanation for Uncertainty Principle or the Schrodinger equation. They just have given the equation and stated it. Also, my chem sir had given a very bad analogy of the Uncertainty Principle ("You're sitting right now, so you have fixed position, but no momentum" . He even said it's easy..) , it's embarrassing tbh. So I would have got frustrated by analogies as such. You were on point. YT is definitely best place to learn. Thanks to youtubers like you.

  • @notcloroxbleach1387
    @notcloroxbleach1387 4 роки тому +38

    This video actually does a decent job of representing this.

  • @melhead77
    @melhead77 3 роки тому +83

    I’ve just watched this with my 8 year old who has been asking me lots of questions about quantum physics having watched Antman. A bit technical for him just yet, but I learned something! Thanks!

  • @mosu8026
    @mosu8026 9 місяців тому +1

    The wave-particle part is the same for the electromagnetic spectrum as for example: X-rays travel in wavelenghs but interact with matter as particles.

  • @simplestthings618
    @simplestthings618 2 роки тому +6

    This 13 Minute Explains about past 100 years of Quantum Mechanics. Some People Even Professional Physicist can't explain it Simply. 👏👏👏