Omega Seamaster : New vs Old

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 8 жов 2019
  • Two seamasters side by side comparison.
    ✔ PATREON
    / thetimelesswatchchannel
    ✔ I N S T A G R A M
    / thetimelesswatchchannel
    ✔ F A C E B O O K
    / the-timeless-watch-cha...
    ✔ E M A I L
    thetimelesswatchchannel@gmail.com

КОМЕНТАРІ • 281

  • @AlfredoRGuillen
    @AlfredoRGuillen 9 місяців тому +8

    I still think the first version, the iconic one, is more beautiful, more elegant and more wearable...and it ages nicely.

  • @bjornapyro
    @bjornapyro 4 роки тому +22

    Yeah that understated wave pattern and “floating hands” on the older watch is really nice.

  • @bigidiot123
    @bigidiot123 3 роки тому +10

    I have the old one in quartz. The exact reference that Brosnan wore in the movie. Definitely gives me nostalgia to when I was a kid, I love James Bond movies of the 90s.
    I agree that the new one is a bit over done. The shade of blue they choose almost looks cartoonish in a way. The over $5k price tag is a bit of a shocker as well, it may well be worth the cash with the co-axial movement and such but that's more than I'd ever spend. The $1,200 I spent on the quartz was already a stretch.

  • @dbkincaid1
    @dbkincaid1 4 роки тому +35

    The new Omega Diver might be the most beautiful Diving Watch I’ve ever seen. I just bought the black one with rubber strap. Simply stunning. One thing that’s never mentioned is the change in the hour hand. The new one is much nicer looking.

  • @timothythomas1626
    @timothythomas1626 3 роки тому +16

    I prefer the old wave dial. Over the newer more pronounced wave dial.

  • @shipmate3577
    @shipmate3577 4 роки тому +74

    George Michael... this is where you've been hiding!?! Great review... enjoyed it.

  • @donkroh4986
    @donkroh4986 4 роки тому +9

    The original in blue, quartz and steel insert was my first luxury watch. Devastated when it was stolen some years ago as it shared a lot of memories. Have the current model in black and love it.

  • @bogrot69
    @bogrot69 4 роки тому +38

    You mean yours doesn't cut through rope? I' hate to break it to you ... it's a fake. 😁 Great vid mate, cheers!

  • @marcdee4427
    @marcdee4427 3 роки тому +6

    Just watched this video again, and I must say the new omega is absolutely beautiful 👍🏻

  • @nickbyrne1962
    @nickbyrne1962 3 роки тому +2

    Brilliant review/comparison of the older and new Seamasters - enjoyable and very informative, so thank you for making the video and putting it up here for everyone to see.

  • @rickgano75
    @rickgano75 4 роки тому +5

    I've had my 300m for 17 years. There are a 1000 subby homage but I have never seen one like this. Still love and admire it.

  • @mdesmet9111
    @mdesmet9111 4 роки тому +11

    Based on the pics and vids I was undecided between the new one and the previous version for a long time, but as soon as I saw them next to each other in real life, I was sold for the new one. I've had mine for about half a year now and absolutely love it! I fully agree that it's just as good as my Submariner, which is funny since I literally payed half the price of the Sub for the Omega!

  • @johncavender1862
    @johncavender1862 4 роки тому +26

    When I started shopping for the newest Seamaster, I planned to buy the blue version. Instead, I chose the the black dialed version, it felt more subtle and versatile.

    • @danisheverblue
      @danisheverblue 3 роки тому +1

      Personally prefer the white dial.

    • @lukemallet916
      @lukemallet916 3 роки тому +2

      @@danisheverblue I was torn between the back and the white vial... But since it was my first watch I felt the black went with more things... The white is sick

    • @martinkaplan1805
      @martinkaplan1805 3 роки тому +1

      @@lukemallet916 when I ask my wife if the white one goes with whatever I’m wearing, she says that “ gorgeous watch goes with anything. “. And she means it!

    • @zman8340
      @zman8340 Рік тому

      Same here

    • @christopherjensen5007
      @christopherjensen5007 Рік тому +4

      I purchased the new blue one on the bracelet today. I've ordered a blue rubber strap for it too. Call it an early birthday present for myself. 56 next month!

  • @shaneweightman
    @shaneweightman 4 роки тому +13

    Think I prefer the older one , the new one is sort of in your face , thanks for the great vid Shane uk 🇬🇧

  • @menandroplan1554
    @menandroplan1554 3 роки тому +16

    LOVE that you mentioned the gleaming handset on the original version. Thats one of the things i love about the OG. I actually prefer it over the newer models due to its manageable and versatile case size as well as the unique gleam of the aluminium bezel vs that of ceramic

  • @billmedic1995
    @billmedic1995 Рік тому +2

    Mate, I can’t believe the condition of your 1993 Seamaster! Mine’s from ‘98 and my bezel has faded to a light blueberry color and the tip of my second hand is a very faint orange. Yours looks like it was never out of the box! Beautiful and great video as always. I’ve only recently discovered your channel (sorry, I watch too many UA-cam watch channels so I recently filtered down to a few I really like, including yours) and I’ve really been enjoying your content. Cheers!

    • @caporretto
      @caporretto Рік тому

      Hey Bill, I noticed that too, it looks new, it could well be that the watch was serviced, the dial of 1993 model should have patina on it (unless new) the bezel is perfect, that might have been replaced during service too.
      Omega are replacing bezel and insert to the seamaster 300 blue during service for free, they will need to keep the old bezel, at least here in the UK

  • @ConspiredPictures
    @ConspiredPictures 4 роки тому +4

    See I love the pre-ceramic 2006 model with the original wave dial, applied markers and coaxial escapement. Best of both worlds. My grail. Plus Casino Royale

  • @paulbird1808
    @paulbird1808 3 роки тому +1

    A thorough analysis of a watch that a lot of us have thought of buying, with a surprising amount of differences between the two - great video, thanks!

  • @bonzerrrrr
    @bonzerrrrr 4 роки тому +5

    Very nice review. We have the original midsize quartz and the Bond 41mm mechanical (2006). We passed the midsize on to the Mrs, an attorney, who regularly wears it. Adjustment of the original bracelet is not easy, as it uses the pin & collar system. My original will be passed on to my nephew. We have the original Planet Ocean with Co-Axil movement. The Seamaster 300M actually keeps better time than the Planet Ocean, even after having it cleaned, serviced & regulated by Omega in SoCal. I’m a retired 🇺🇸 special agent. Most of the agents preferred Rolex I but being a contrarian, gravitated to Omega. Love my 1999 “Man on the Moon”, which like my other Omegas will outlast me and not be sold. I invested in stocks not watches 😁

  • @ellisjasond
    @ellisjasond 4 роки тому +1

    Love the channel so far, keep up the interesting content!

  • @Watchmade
    @Watchmade 4 роки тому +2

    Great comparison. I love the red line in their design language. And even after couple years both watches will be still timeless.

  • @anthonyonline4740
    @anthonyonline4740 2 роки тому

    First vid I've seen of yours. So chill.
    You present very well. Keep it up

  • @jerrydearman4679
    @jerrydearman4679 3 роки тому +2

    Good review. I fitted the adjustable clasp to my older SMP - a very nice addition.

  • @nazimL1011
    @nazimL1011 3 роки тому +3

    The guy’s style is really unique....a real movie character !

  • @martinkemp1016
    @martinkemp1016 4 роки тому

    Good vid. Like that you get right to the point, with no nonsense.

  • @mikeg7944
    @mikeg7944 3 роки тому +5

    Great piece. I really do have to say though that I think which seamaster you will like is based on the day that you got interested in watches. Right now there's an incredible new amount of interest in luxury watches. With the new crowd it seems that a lot of the new purchasers are turned off by the scarcity of Rolex. They hit a milestone in their life and they want to treat themselves by walking into an AD and buying what they like. Currently that is the Omega seamaster. It seems to me that future collecting is dependent on the mindset of 10-20 year olds. When you hit your 40's you've got peak purchasing power. We will see if my theory plays out with that. Rolex trying to become the new AP, or Patek I think will hurt them because Patek and AP fetch higher prices they do so at significantly less volume.

  • @jdillinger2307
    @jdillinger2307 4 роки тому +6

    I believe the buzz saw watch (used to cut rope) was a Rolex Sub from Live and let die... though there were a number of other gadgets on the SMP during later films.

  • @dvpemberton
    @dvpemberton 3 роки тому

    Great video, Subscribed.
    This has helped me to finally pull the trigger on an 1120. Just waiting to collect my new (pre-owned) 2531 from an AD. It's been fully reconditioned by Omega with box and papers. Have agreed to exchange my GS SBGA285 for it. I've been after one for years - used to have the blue ceramic and didn't like the way the bezel markings vanished in moderate lighting. Really enjoying the content in these videos and the shots in different lighting. Keep safe and well sir.

  • @fasteddy60
    @fasteddy60 4 роки тому

    Excellent video! Thanks for posting. I recently purchased a 1993 2561.80 Midsize Quartz. I absolutely love it.

  • @no1fibersplicer525
    @no1fibersplicer525 3 роки тому

    I like the new one myself but I can appreciate where you’re coming from as well. Great video

  • @ItsTimePictures
    @ItsTimePictures 4 роки тому +11

    Well done review and commentary. I myself love the newer version and wear it every day. It's thick, but all of the modern Omegas are. But it's not obtuse. My big complaint for all of these are the skeleton hands, which makes it hard to see the time at night. Just not enough looooommmmm. Anyway... The newest edition has fit and finish that is mind blowing and superior to most dive watches under 10 grand. The anti-magnetic properties are as good as it can get and therefore it's a keeper. For me.
    EDIT: Let me also state that the gliding micro adjustments are fantastic in the summer. During winter it stays in the closed position but during summer I am always opening it up up up as the day progresses. Once you have a bracelet with this function you can never go back.

    • @malcpilling7935
      @malcpilling7935 3 роки тому

      Shame yours got swept away at sea Matt !!

    • @skyfallseven365
      @skyfallseven365 2 роки тому

      Agreed! Regarding the clasp o actually had mine fitted in the winter with the glide setting in the middle cause like you said my wrist swells in summer months and I can make it bigger but in the winter I also notice my wrist shrinks and I need to make it smaller than normal size. I noticed this when I originally had the bracelet set to the smallest setting in winter and it was super cold the watch would slide down. So now long story short I set it to the middle so I can not only make it larger but I can also make it smaller

  • @mrp9498
    @mrp9498 4 роки тому +4

    Great video. I have the gray dial SMP300. I love how that bracelet feels on the wrist.

  • @solidus1995
    @solidus1995 4 роки тому +18

    I love the helium valve honestly

    • @phmwu7368
      @phmwu7368 4 роки тому

      Toothpaste cap you mean 😂 😂 😂

    • @Kyu7
      @Kyu7 4 роки тому +7

      Same. It gives it character...its a feature mostly unique to this watch. Boo to the people who want the Omega Seamaster to be a clone of the Rolex Submariner

  • @matthewkang
    @matthewkang 4 роки тому +1

    This is a brilliant video. I own the older SMP 300m with co-axial and it's great.

  • @timothyouellette2815
    @timothyouellette2815 3 роки тому

    I really enjoy your videos & appreciate your humility. I’ve owned both & currently own the latest Seamaster co axial master. I have say it’s like anything there’s certain things I miss about the earlier version. However, I like it’s a bit brash & the co axial movement makes it the clear winner for me. Cheers

  •  4 роки тому

    2531.80 is my first luxury watch, it was either this or a Tudor Black Bay (with the blue bezel). So happy I picked the Omega though, It's even better than I could have imagined looking at the pictures and videos, and at a great price point. Awesome video as always, thank you

  • @havefunoutthere6378
    @havefunoutthere6378 4 роки тому +14

    I've got the old version, but there are 3 things I prefer on the new one:
    1. The date is at the 6. It makes it look more symmetrical.
    2. The bracelet. The old one looks...old.
    3. The skeleton back. It's just super cool.
    The downside is that helium valve. Too chunky.
    Great video comparison.

    • @johnthomas424
      @johnthomas424 3 роки тому

      I agree. However, on the upside from a distance you know it's an OMEGA with that he escape valve. I have THE GREAT WHITE. I am a #ROLEXFANBOY though.

  • @E2EK131MM
    @E2EK131MM 2 роки тому +1

    Loved the one they released inbetween...

  • @luispadilla2212
    @luispadilla2212 4 роки тому +5

    New Omega great watch in my opinion way better looking and better movement than the Rolex Submariner. Great video thanks.

  • @ImperiusTemplar
    @ImperiusTemplar 4 роки тому +4

    Bro your channel is a hidden gem. Keep at it and you’re gonna go far!

  • @thehairlesspersian3273
    @thehairlesspersian3273 2 роки тому

    Have the old version but w/the black wave dial calibre 2500 and love as a daily beater, so versatile - you’re absolutely right about how the light shimmers off the hands. I always wonder why they didn’t use a flush helium escapement like Breitling and others have done 🤷🏻‍♂️

  • @DavidScott-xr8qg
    @DavidScott-xr8qg 3 роки тому

    I own three seamasters, 2003 black wave dial yellow gold bezel, 2004 titanium black non wave dial red gold bezel and a 2020 blue dial. Whilst I love the subtlety of the older wave dial and the sword hands, the new one is just an unbelievably spec’d watch for the money. The dial is incredible (looks anything from grey, light blue, bright blue, or black depending on lighting) and since it’s purchase last July, I’ve had a very difficult time getting it off the wrist. If I had to narrow my collection to just one watch, this would be the one!

  • @MrMustangrick
    @MrMustangrick 3 роки тому +1

    Looking at used Seamaster's now. Still on the waitlist at my Rolex dealer for the 41 Sub. Great vid, thanks!

  • @travisharrisphotography
    @travisharrisphotography 2 роки тому +2

    I have the black version of the older one. Bought new in 2010 and its my fav. watch. I love it, 12 years later never serviced and its still running -1/sec a day. unreal. The new one is cool, but.. too big for me now. I think the 41mm was best ;-)

    • @zman8340
      @zman8340 Рік тому +1

      Wow I have the new version hope it serves me as well.

    • @travisharrisphotography
      @travisharrisphotography Рік тому

      @@zman8340 Oh it will! Even better I am sure. It's an amazing watch, that will be apart of your life forever.

  • @romerider1000
    @romerider1000 3 роки тому

    Subscribed...I’ve watched countless hours of Rolex videos trying to find out if my late dads GMT master 2 was real. You have the best explanations

  • @slide7132
    @slide7132 Місяць тому

    Thank you, great work, love my Seamaster 300.

  • @Harry-tb8yo
    @Harry-tb8yo Рік тому

    I watched this video more than once since I'm a big fan of the Seamaster line in general and the blue one always was something special for me. I don't have one of the watches shown in this video but the 2220.80 which has been worn by Daniel Craig in Casino Royale. It has all the nice things from the 2531, the slim case, the subtle wave pattern, the nicely draping bracelet and the tucked in helium escape valve. Plus applied markers and logo, the red Seamaster writing on the dial and of course a co-axial movement. Can't wait to get it back from service.

  • @spacejaime
    @spacejaime 4 роки тому +1

    You haven't told us your name...anyway about the back display - its there because the Swatch Group likes to show their excellent Omega motor - and because few owners actually dive with it and many more use it as a dress watch. I personally love to watch a beautifully finished motor in action. Can't trace your accent, but like me, its your second language - except your pronunciation (and watch collection) is better than mine. Liked and subscribed. Excellent channel - cheers!

  • @Longshore79
    @Longshore79 4 роки тому +1

    I like my 2017 Seamaster the best. There’s a white dial Version coming out soon that looks amazing . Can’t wait to check it out

    • @mrp9498
      @mrp9498 4 роки тому

      Nicky T Yes with the black strap. I’m considering getting that one. Comes out in November.

  • @tacohans2262
    @tacohans2262 4 роки тому +3

    The new 2018 SMP is such a great watch, best in class by a mile. Even better than the SUB at 1/3 of the price.

  • @theowl_2614
    @theowl_2614 4 роки тому +2

    I really enjoyed both of your videos discussing the Omega Seamaster. Your channel is off to great start. Good luck! Btw - what type of sunglasses do you wear. Great shades....

    •  4 роки тому +1

      Thanks Joe! The sunglasses are Giorgio Armani. As a creature of the night my whole life (ex rock musician), i need them always! LOL. Thanks for watching. More content coming!

  • @Nexus.Achiles
    @Nexus.Achiles 4 роки тому +2

    Good comparison. I prefer the dial in the old one. The wave pattern in the new one looks too clinical and disappears in some areas especially under certain angles. Cupcake HEV is kind of odd but not a deal breaker in itself. Bracelet however is a big minus to me. I'd have it replaced with rubber, NATO, leather, anything but that bracelet. My only deal breaker is the skeleton hands. This is the main reason I went with the 2005 PO2500 Casino Royale instead, love the neptunian arrow hands, the bracelet, the overall rugged and badass toolwatch look. This doesn't mean I can't appreciate a dressy looking diver (Breitling SOH, Rolex YM which is almost a diver, VC overseas) but somehow the skeleton hands ruin it for me. But hey it's good to have different tastes, else life would be boring.
    Great content as always. Take care.

  • @TekTrekgamer
    @TekTrekgamer 4 роки тому

    Excellent video. Thank you.

  • @jimz3476
    @jimz3476 4 роки тому +4

    Great review. I'm currently considering buying the new 2018 model..shopping around ..agree with your comments..they are good food for thought...I prefer the more classical subtle look but there are too many upgrades on the newer model to bypass it..

    • @jean4j_
      @jean4j_ 11 місяців тому

      Same!! I'm afraid the new one will be too big.
      Which one you chose?

  • @nickrice7535
    @nickrice7535 3 роки тому +2

    After looking at a new Seamaster with its over done wave dial I immediately searched for and bought the older model..

  • @ian-davidbrown8405
    @ian-davidbrown8405 10 місяців тому

    love it, i have the earlier model and totally agree with you especially about the bezel i went back to the dealer a couple of times but its just the way it is.

  • @callum1995ful
    @callum1995ful Рік тому

    Another fantastic video on new vs old Seamasters however I’d be interested to hear which one would you choose? As a side note, with a vast collection of watches, do you use a watch winder? Brilliant content, and thoroughly enjoyable. 🙏

  • @chrisb9156
    @chrisb9156 4 роки тому +2

    I have the new 300m as my thirst lux watch and love it 😍

  • @petercharron3268
    @petercharron3268 Рік тому

    So many reviews on UA-cam comparing old vs new just means the original is the iconic one

  • @abrayshaw1657
    @abrayshaw1657 6 місяців тому

    An interesting review. Thanks. I used to have the mid size quartz in the black in about 2010. A really nice watch, but a tad too small for my wrist, so I sold it on. I've recently purchased the latest 42 mm in green with the rubber strap. A stunning looking watch that I'll keep. The build quality is superb. I think the helium escape valve is a feature of the Seamaster. I don't really notice it. Long may it continue. I prefer the rubber strap over the bracelet. Just a personal preference. I find It's much more comfortable to wear.

  • @mcstarling07
    @mcstarling07 4 роки тому +1

    I own a 2531.80 and I'm thinking about doing the mod to the newer clasp. I've read that it's fairly simple and I'd love to have some adjustments.

  • @Daavi85
    @Daavi85 4 роки тому +2

    I have alot of the same thoughts as you with my Omega it's just a different model but similar differences, I have a Seamaster Planet Ocean first gen 2500c 42mm, matte black dial/black bezel with white tri arabics, now this watch does have a sentimental value as it was a gift from my uncle/godfather on my 30th birthday who I pretty much caught the watch bug from at a young age so it's pretty much priceless to me but it is what I would consider my first luxury watch and I absolutely love it, over the years I've really grown to appreciate the styling even more, Omega make a great watch and I'm a fan of they're watches but as I've seen the newer versions of the PO all in all I still prefer mine, yes the newer models are beautiful, I really do appreciate the newer upgrades like the adjustable clasp, ceramic bezel and movements to name a few because they are really impressive and I know the quality is there but it's the subtle understated look of mine that I love, the matte black dial instead of the newer gloss finish, the white tri arabics instead of the polished applied arabics on the newer models, ect, I know exactly what you mean when you talk about how the hands look like they're floating at some angles, it's amazing! The AR coating makes the crystal disappear! The thicker case of the newer one is a little much at a little over 16mm if I'm not mistaken, mine is already a beefy 14.5mm thick but not nearly over the top for a 600m depth rating but its just in my opinion a better looking watch then the current version and wears better, the display caseback on the new versions are cool and I understand that Omega would want to show off the beautiful movements they're producing but I also like my engraved Seamaster Hippocampus caseback especially on a real dive watch, in your words" a more grown up watch" I agree, it's less blingy and more toolish with a certain charm to it in of itself and I love that about it, there's only ever one original⌚, I'm a new subscriber and I like your approach to the content of the hobby and watches we love, look forward to more of your videos 👍

    •  4 роки тому +1

      Thanks for your comments David. More content coming soon! Thanks for watching!

  • @novik7115
    @novik7115 3 роки тому +1

    Спасибо ! Классный обзор !

  • @Silverback303
    @Silverback303 3 роки тому +5

    Lot of love for the old one but i think the new one is the perfect evolution of the Seamaster. I have mine for a year now and i’m enjoying it like the first day. Great review as always.

    • @jean4j_
      @jean4j_ 11 місяців тому

      Isn't it too big though?

  • @Dave-fi7xg
    @Dave-fi7xg 4 роки тому +2

    Great channel I think I prefer the sea master over the sub mariner

  • @graytshirt
    @graytshirt Рік тому

    Love this video! I actually picked up the new Seamaster in blue a few months back and had to send it in to Omega for repair last month when it stopped running. I love the watch though and cant wait to get it back. Since its been away, I have found myself looking for a second one and this video has me wondering if I should be looking at the older gen, perhaps in black? Any recommendations on finding a quality / authentic used piece?

  • @jettenderarora8982
    @jettenderarora8982 4 роки тому +8

    2531for me. Tried on the new version . Very nice but a bit too blingy for me .

  • @jeremydahm2124
    @jeremydahm2124 4 роки тому +6

    I have the older as well. 20 years of reliable service. Incredible time keeping. The new one is beautiful and I'd definitely buy one but I wouldn't trade mine in for equal money. Bigger versions are never better in watches unless your going ladies size to man size. Thankfully Omega still offers the Speedy in nearly original form. Could be my next watch. Cheers.

  • @FR33STyla72
    @FR33STyla72 4 роки тому +1

    Great video, I like your style. Subbed.

    •  4 роки тому +1

      Thanks!!

  • @jota3732
    @jota3732 3 роки тому

    I love the original seamaster , I bought the one in the middle , plane black face , with ceramic dial , the new wave dial is on my must have , white face with black rubber strap , such a great look .

  • @UCZ15
    @UCZ15 3 роки тому +1

    I had to make a choice for my first 'proper' watch and I bought a 38mm Aqua Terra that has the 8800 movement in it... absolutely unbelievable movement. Gains 0.8spd during the day and less than that during the night (although I've figured out the angle to leave it overnight LOL)

  • @Ratfish09
    @Ratfish09 4 роки тому

    Great video my dude

  • @Tsam291093
    @Tsam291093 3 роки тому

    Nice video. Thank for your sharing

  • @dw6410
    @dw6410 3 роки тому +1

    dwp64
    I like both I think they did a really good job on both ...as time goes by I beleive ones will warm up to the new one , and there are a lot of ones like myself that like it now... and yet love the older style one also , you have to give Omega more credit they know what there doing , you can't make them the same and for marketing and for keeping resale values up it just makes you want both and keeps the integrity of the past gens and keeps there value up not just for Omega but for all who own them .....Outstanding Omega Well Done................

    • @MaestroDeca
      @MaestroDeca 3 роки тому +1

      Wish you used periods. Anyways, I agree with everything you said. Over time this one will be a classic. It modernized in the best ways possible. I do think they might dial the size back a bit in the future. But as a taller guy like myself, the new Omega is the perfect size

  • @PH-md8xp
    @PH-md8xp 2 роки тому

    Great video! Another difference- The new Seamaster is a Master Chronometer with a higher precision of 0/+5 seconds per day and a 55 hour power reserve. Hard to beat really.

  • @muffemod
    @muffemod Рік тому

    Great review!

  • @faisalahmed1982
    @faisalahmed1982 3 роки тому +1

    I like the new one! I have the 2008 Sea Master James Bond Black dial Quartz version since 2012....
    Its time to upgrade to the new one. Thank you Sir for a very detailed comparison!

    • @jean4j_
      @jean4j_ 11 місяців тому

      So did you?

  • @garywilson3904
    @garywilson3904 4 роки тому +4

    Are they both yours and do you were them both often. Reason I ask I was contemplating the new white dial,and I own the old black wave dial

    •  4 роки тому +5

      i wear the old all the time. I've worn the new maybe 3 times ever. It's just not as mature looking as the old.

  • @pisanu6699
    @pisanu6699 3 роки тому

    May I ask you whether the bracelet of the old generation is thinner than the new one? How much the weight different between the two? Thanks and already subscribed.

  • @gp2712
    @gp2712 4 роки тому +19

    New one wins!!
    Up to 15000 anti magnetic
    Ceramic bezel and insert
    Better bezel action
    Micro clasp
    Date window at 6
    Bullet proof 8800 movement
    Very accurate gains only 3 min a month
    42 mm
    Original wave pattern

    • @49fiori
      @49fiori 4 роки тому +1

      3 minutes a month? I got something like a minute a month on mine. Sapphire on the back so you can enjoy the beauty of 8800. Ceramic dial. Sits comfortably on the wrist.

    • @gp2712
      @gp2712 4 роки тому

      Yea you are right about the minute and maybe less than that since I’ve had mine for over a year.

    • @leebarrett9581
      @leebarrett9581 3 роки тому

      Nah the old one looks miles nicer. The part where he shows the height of the case says it all.

  • @rockon21ful
    @rockon21ful 4 роки тому +2

    Nice review. I'll take my old (2000) 2531.80 with the painted on lume hour markers and aluminum bezel insert, sexier dial and everything is just the right size. You start super sizing watches that have the same look and it's not always a good end result. He haven't done a thing to my old lad, its second hand has faded to a bright orange, the dial has faded a bit but at 19 years of age it still keeps amazing time and the super luminova still glows brightly through the night.. I'll stick with the original! I'll agree with you on the clasp, as with most brands watches from the 90's &early 2000's the bracelets and clasp weren't the best and all the big boys have upgraded their bracelets and clasps, which I really enjoy but lets use Rolex as the bracelets and clasp are stunning today but i'm not into these fat lugged maxi cases, the old Submariner case was so damn sexy and miss it in the brand..

  • @richv7749
    @richv7749 4 роки тому +1

    I like the date indicator better on the original version. I used to own the Bond version, wish I hadn't sold it.

  • @richardgreen8919
    @richardgreen8919 3 роки тому

    I may have commented on this video already.I am not getting any younger ! Anyway,I thoroughly enjoyed watching it again. I really like these watches and,unlike Rolex,you can buy one at your a.d. Keep the videos coming.Love the cool location.Stay safe and keep well.

  • @mobydick3895
    @mobydick3895 3 роки тому

    You ought to investigate the old style Seamaster chronographs sometime. It was worn by one of the villains in a Bond movie before. The chrono hands on it have red color and pop underwater in the sunlight like a Ferrari dashboard! It is quite thick, though. I love mine! Just think, a Submariner and a Daytona put into one watch, and the buttons even work underwater.

  • @Moitincu
    @Moitincu 4 роки тому +2

    Mine has gained 4 seconds in 3 weeks...On top of everything else, that's why I appreciate it so much.

  • @MrJintensive
    @MrJintensive 4 роки тому

    I own a 2599.80 chronograph, and it is not hard to rotate the bezel. Good review.

  • @Elfin4
    @Elfin4 4 роки тому +2

    I have an original 90's model seamster chrono in titanium and the helium escape knob is central over the 10'O'clock mark. Used it for diving wore it almost everyday, and still a fantastic watch. Dont like the new design, looks like they have made it look cheaper although I do like the clear glass back. The sapphire crystal glass on the old design is still good and the bezel can still be used with divers gloves. Dislikes are the £500 to service.

  • @bryansmith7490
    @bryansmith7490 3 роки тому +1

    No comparison between the 2, it comes down to nostalgia vs a superior watch!! I have the white dial and soon will have the blue.

  • @GearZenChannel
    @GearZenChannel 3 роки тому +1

    They should have kept the subtle wave dial for the new model but still added the raised indices and ceramic bezel. Icing on the cake would be sword hands.

  • @petercharron3268
    @petercharron3268 Рік тому

    Have a perfect 1993. Bezel has faded to a beautiful soft blueberry and lum is almost gone. But it is gorgeous, no scratches. 😊

  • @John..18
    @John..18 2 роки тому +1

    Yes, totally agree, the new version is much, much better, the coaxial escapement is truly amazing. The old one looks very dated now..

    • @jean4j_
      @jean4j_ 11 місяців тому

      I do have a problem with the bling bling vibe that ceramic bezels gives. Especially with Rolex watches.

  • @DWilliam1
    @DWilliam1 3 роки тому

    I own the old one, bought new in 2000 and I prefer it. Has a timeless look, super comfortable bracelet, date at the 3:00, solid back with the iconic logo and the wavy dial just blends in better. The only negative is the aluminum bezel which is difficult to rotate. The dislike the looks of the new one even though it has great specs.

  • @glostergloster6945
    @glostergloster6945 2 роки тому

    Got the old one, love it. If only you could get the new clasp for an old one!

  • @S13Andy
    @S13Andy 8 місяців тому

    Im curious where did you find out the information about the dial being made with a rose mill?

  • @leeharding8306
    @leeharding8306 4 роки тому +4

    I have the new one in blue and it’s a awesome piece to live with and own. Time keeping is incredible as is build quality. Always loved the original design and this new one is a new and modern evolution of that watch but it also leap frogs it’s Rolex competition in quality at the same time. I’m a Rolex fan too but the new Seamaster is a better watch than the sub although the sub is a beautiful watch.

    • @leeharding8306
      @leeharding8306 4 роки тому +2

      Daniel D'Esposito at certain angles on my Seamaster it looks like the crystal isn’t there👍🏼 the applied markers look particularly cool and flawless as you look across the crystal too. I don’t want to put down Rolex as I really like them but I think they are more interested in games and marketing than quality unfortunately.

  • @raymondr.16
    @raymondr.16 2 роки тому

    Do the ‘93 Seamaster Professional Chronograph 300m have the serial number on rear of lug or inside the back cover?

  • @BuckNaked2k
    @BuckNaked2k Рік тому

    Is this the watch you were wearing on your Friday livestream?

  • @davegunner49
    @davegunner49 4 роки тому +2

    I own both the new Omega SMP300M and the SubC Nodate. I love Omega and it's the geekier watch with the better specs but if you hold the Sub in your hand, it feels like a higher quality watch in terms of the materials used. The bezel and crown action are second to none and the watch is basically an institution and a financial asset. The higher price of the Sub is still justified. I only want to keep one of the two which is a hard decision. Love them both.

    •  4 роки тому +2

      If you can, keep them both. Best of both worlds!

  • @pwnish3r
    @pwnish3r 2 роки тому

    You can absolutely tell crystal looks invisible in most shots on the new one. It's hard to tell because of how polished the dial looks but something that once it is pointed out to you, is very impressive.

  • @michaelfierman3256
    @michaelfierman3256 4 роки тому

    it's hard to believe that it's only 1mm bigger, and I don't even mean the fact that it's thicker etc. it looks far more massive. anyway, loved learning about that double AR coating. that one shot you got where you literally couldn't see the crystal at all. Another good one. Thanks!

    • @kekehe
      @kekehe Рік тому

      Old one is 11,8mm thick, not 12,6 as told in video. That is why I like old one.