Airbus already made us know how good the A321LR was with the capacity of being able to do transatlantic flights, and they now come with another aircraft that can easily take you up to cities like Havana, Dallas, Denver... truly amazing
Yes it is truly amazing if the airlines open up new routes connecting together cities that would normally require a connection. The airplane is really comfortable, smooth and quiet!
@@welcomeaboardHD Comfortable in business. Of course it is. What a statement is it this? Try 9 hours on a narrow body in economy. In wide body you can walk and stretch as long as you want to. Those who promote and defend small planes for 8-10 hours flights (where you can't walk, crew can't work and turbolences are much stronger) are the same criminals who defend the covid and enviromental madness etc etc. Just to get us back to the stone age. Instead of advancing we go backward. In everything.
TAP AIR Portugal has been flying for over a year with the Airbus 321/LR to Boston and Newark, but also to Washington and cities in the northeast of Brazil, I don't know what's new!?!
Thank you for your nice comment. It was actually very comfortable, really enjoyed the flight. This is just the beginning, as other Airlines will also put the A321XLR into their long haul operations.
At the end of the day, it's still a narrow body aircraft, and whilst the Bizz class looks combatable is also looks very claustrophobic, then at the back the normal 3x3 seating is no different than a normal A320 series aircraft, so my thoughts on flying a 7 hour Atlantic flight in a tight, claustrophobic cabin is not a world class game changer, I would still use a 787 or A350 over this to fly the same route.
I can assure you that the business class seat is really comfortable, you get a great sense of privacy. The economy seats offer the same space as on a widebody. But I’m with you, would choose a widebody all the way! Nothing like the thrill of feeling the powerful engines and the way the big birds lift their nose up!
It all depends on where you are flying from and to. It might be the case that this is a route that involves a stopover, in which case the A321XLR is potentially a game changer by offering a direct service.
POR FIN UNA GRAN AEROLÍNEA PONE UNA CLASE BUSINESS A LA ALTURA DE LA GRANDEZA ESPAÑOLA 🇪🇸 COMO AEROLÍNEA Y QUE LOS PONGA TAMBIEN A TF CON ESA CLASE BUSINESS.
Amazing report! I think this was Iberia´s 3rd flight with the A321 XLR before launching their flight to Boston. I love the new business class. Looks amazing!
Thank you for the comment! The first flight was November 6th when they did Madrid-Paris-Madrid, Madrid-Paris-Madrid. This return flight from Stockholm to Madrid was on November 7th, so it makes it flight nr 6 😁 All in all a very very good experience and the seat was awesome. You feel like you have your own suite.
Ojalá, sería estupendo y algo increíble. Pero lamentablemente no creo que suceda. En Europa la clase business seguirá siendo así durante mucho tiempo. Sin embargo hay varias rutas donde operan aviones de fuselaje ancho: Iberia Madrid-Londres A350 Air Europa Madrid-Barcelona, Madrid-Las Palmas y Madrid-Amsterdam B787 Finnair Helsinki-Londres, Helsinki-Amsterdam y Helsinki-Las Palmas A350 Ethiopian opera varias rutas en Europa con el B787 Singapore Airlines Milán-Barcelona A350
@welcomeaboardHD I Love Iberia Airlines I hope to fly with there New Airbus A321XLR Planes in the upcoming years which would be good for me since I haven't flown on a Single Aisle Across The Europe but I'll get there I'll save it on my Bucket lists.
Found the registration hilarant lol, EC-OIL (sounding like "easy oil"), funny name for a plane promising such low consumptions over so long routes lol. If they could only extend the range for a couple of hours more, then Iberia would be able to fly most of the Americas from Madrid with this plane. With the current range, they can make the US East coast and maybe Brazil and some Caribbean destinations, as those are between 6-10 hours of flight. But Extending it to 12 hours would allow Iberia to have regular flights to the US West coast (where wide planes are harder to fill for them), half Mexico (including DF), and a lot of secondary (in terms of air traffic volume to Europe) destinations in South America. Also I think the configuration of this plain is particularly good for the longer european routes such as the one you did. Madrid-Stockholm is around 4 hours, making it in one of these planes must be way better than making it in the average crapmpted european flight. Unfortunately that business class is not flexible enough to make it work in the long run for European flights. Would you think people would pay the extra to fly the >6 hours of a Stockholm-Tenerife flight on one of these? I know it's not Iberia's business but would be nice if IAG flew these routes with Iberia Express or Vueling using these planes.
Yes the name is cool, it means it goes easier on the oil 😁 This plane could reach great parts of the US (not the west coast), as well as Cuba, Republica Dominicana, Puerto Rico, Venezuela, parts of Colombia and Brazil. But this plane was actually intended for Aer Lingus, which is closer to the US and probably have less passenger demand. Due to agreements between pilots and unions, it was finally given to Iberia so they will make the best of it. I fly European business quite a lot, and actually like it, despite the regular seat you get. Would of course prefer a real business class seat. And I do believe there is a market for it. Every time I fly business in Europe, the business class is full. If you can have this product on a european flight of 3 hours +, I think many would pay 400 to 500 euros. And some even more. For the shorter european flights, there is no need for this luxury, although it would be nice 😁 This plane is fantastic, like its said in Spain, «es la hostia»
Tenerife - Stockholm is a route you can fly with a regular a321. Iberia should open new thinner transatlantic routes with the Xlr, Madrid - Boston is already served by Iberia's a330s. They should open new routes from other Spanish cities to the US, particularly during the summer months.
WOW!.... Awesome to see this A321XLR, that business class on Iberia looks fantasic & that food you had., yummy what a feast / top quality too!. Seating looks very comfortable a longer flight would be better, as to really enjoy being on board., i'd be interested to know what the economy cabin is like maybe you could do a review on that👍🛫
The only problem with single aisle on long haul is the difficulty to get to and from the loo while food and drinks trolleys occupy the aisle, no option to move to the other aisle. I also hear that for the flight attendants the Iberia config means a very small galley considering full meal service.
Yes, you are right about that. That is a certain drawback with a single aisle aircraft on longer trips. Thanks for mentioning it, it had not crossed my mind.
Yes, I also prefer a widebody, duration does not matter, 30 minutes, 10 hours 😁 But in regards to comfort, this plane/configuration/seat, was really good
I have a checked bag 23.4 kg … will they charge for fee because of 0.4 kg more ? With Iberia economic airlines … any information , I appreciate it. From USA
Great video well done. This airplane ✈️ is great because it allows Airlines to offer lie flat business class seats on short haul flights in Europe and long haul flights. Of course there will be a price difference but if you want to experience a lie flat business class seat you will pay a higher ticket price than what you would pay for a business class seat that only offers a leg stretcher. Demand for a lie flat business class seat for flights in Europe might actually be very high because if you want to experience a lie flat business class seat, you have to book a long haul flight which is always more expensive than a short haul. So with the A321XLR you have a chance to experience lie flat business class seats for a short haul flight. Even if the flight is only one hour , the business class ticket will most likely be cheaper than a long haul flight and people that have never experienced a lie flat business class seat in their lives will now have a an opportunity. Even if your short haul business class flight is only one hour , you can still experience it and have a nap on the plane ✈️
Thank you for the comment! You raise some good points. My experience on this aircraft was great. The seat was better than Iberia’s Lie flat seats on their A330 and A350s. European business class should offer a much better seat than what it does today. People are willing to pay. All the times I fly business in Europe, it is completely full, so the market is there!
@@welcomeaboardHDfor sure and I’m making up numbers here but in theory airlines like Lufthansa could charge say €240 for a business class ticket with extra legroom from Frankfurt to Madrid…. But they can also offer lie flat business class seats for €400, 00. So it gives more choices for the customers . Because on average a lie flat business class seat on a long haul flight is €3 000 - €5 000. So just for sake of experiencing business class , European airlines should definitely offer lie flat business class seats on their short haul flights and that way people that have never flown business class lie flat seats before will have a chance to experience it because lie flat business class seats are only offered on long haul wide body aircraft
Evidently you didn't experience transatlantic jet travel in the 1960s, when all aircraft were single aisle. That was supposedly the "golden age of air travel". Personally I would have no issue with flying long haul on the A321XLR. It looks very comfortable and no doubt the fares in relative terms are a fraction of what they were in the 1960s.
No creo que afecte mucho que tenga un solo pasillo para un viaje de 7,8 o 9 horas, lo importante es la comodidad y espacio para no tener que viajar apretado como un albóndiga, que la capacidad del los compartimentos del equipaje de mano sean grandes y accesibles. Que el consumo sea bajo de un 30% menos es una gran noticia, lo que me inquieta y no me emociona, es tener un mechero de 13 toneladas de combustible debajo de mi culo.
Gracias por tu comentario. Estoy de acuerdo contigo. La comodidad en este avión está igual que en los aviones de doble pasillo. Los asientos business son lie-flat, y son buenísimos! Probé los asientos economy tb, y son iguales, con la misma distancia entre filas que los A350. Además con este tipo de avión, se podrán abrir y/o mantener rutas que de otra forma no fuera posible. Bueno, lo del mechero, espero que se haya diseñado para que jamás haya ningún inconveniente 😁
I will never fly a single aisle aircraft on the Atlantic run. That's too cramped. I can't afford to put a family of 4 on an international business class flight. Even premium economy is far too overpriced. Once I flew Stockholm/Philly on a 757. Never again.
I completely understand that! But I can assure you that the space between rows is really good, at least on this specific plane/configuration. Myself however, business or economy, I will always prefer the joy of a widebody!
What marks the difference in comfort on an aeroplane is not the width of the aircraft but the seats arrangement and configuration that a particular airline has chosen. Flying on a A380 or a 777 with 9 or 10 rows abreast, sharing the space with 600 people cramped like chicken on a factory farm has nothing to do with comfort. On the contrary, flying on a plane with little over 150 people makes the trip much more enjoyable with a distance between seats in economy class that can be the same, or even bigger, than the one on a 777. Flying in smaller aeroplanes equals more comfort, as counterintuitive as it may sound.
@@neiss2 Correct. Seat arrangement and leg room is key. Only thing I will say is that when you want to get up and move around for a bit to stretch those legs on a long haul flight the extra room in the aisles and galleys of a widebody is a big plus. Doing some leg stretches for 5 minutes in the galley/restroom area of a narrowbody is awkward at best and probably getting in the way of everyone, particularly the cabin crew.
Given the option of flying direct I have no issue if the aircraft is single aisle. What's far more important is that the seat is comfortable as I will spend most of my time seated.
I haven't had the pleasure of flying Turkish yet, so perhaps you are right. But I am a foodie, and Iberia's food is really great. Ticket prices are also very good compared to what you get.
@@welcomeaboardHD I fly all the time Turkish Airlines Business Class last flew Cyprus Turkish Republic from Ercan airport to istanbul A350-900 since dsgen after flew home A321Neo to Arlanda and wish Iberia switch sides real business class seats 🇹🇷🇹🇷🇹🇷🇹🇷🇹🇷🇹🇷🇹🇷🇹🇷 Next summer Stockholm Istanbul Malaga with Turkish Airlines return home Madrid Istanbul - Stockholm Arlanda connection flight will be both sides 2:45 minutes summer has Turkish has evening departure to Arlanda and morning flight to Istanbul throughout the summer TK1789 return the day after early departure 06:00 TK1790
Please stop kidding me “Iberia is known for serving one of the best food in the skies” ? That’s not true .I have flown THOUSANDS of hour and nobody, excepting if you have been paid by the airline, would say that he would’nt mind flying five more hours … it’s a commercial video.
Perhaps I should have said "in the western hemisphere". Iberia is catered by Do Co, which provides really delicious food. I have been flying on a regular basis since I was 5 years old, which has made me a fanatic of aviation and flying. If an airplane is comfortable, I don't mind spending many hours in it, and in many ways it is the highlight of all my travels. The seat on this airplane was fantastic, so I enjoyed the ride. All my flights are 100% financed by myself, so this is absolutely no commercial video, just my views, opinion and experience.
@@welcomeaboardHD Me ha encantado el video. Me ha parecido muy bueno. Te felicito por el reportaje y la experiencia de primera mano, sortudo :). My "rabieta" fonética ocurre porque Iberia es una palabra española, no Inglesa. Así que si los espanoles no decimos "britis airbais" sino que pronunciamos British Airways lo mejor que podemos, en inglés, no veo por que al hablar en inglés tenemos que decir 'aibiria', siendo Iberia un nombre propio, no un nombre común, con una pronunciación muy definida y sin ambigüedades. El castellano tiene una correspondencia entre lo escrito y lo hablado muy bien definida ( a diferencia del Ingles - por ejemplo, como pronuncias "read" 'rid' o 'red'? Eso en castellano no ocurre). LLevo viviendo en UK muchos anos y lo de aibiria todavía me chirría en los oídos. Y no veas como pronuncian algunos "vueling" :)))
Te doy toda la razón.. el anglicismo en el castellano no me gusta para nada, y creo que es importante evitarlo. Hace poco que empiezo a comentar en mis videos y todavía se me hace un poco extraño. Pues las palabras que tengo en mi cabeza no siempre me salen bien 😅 Vivo en el sur de Noruega y viajé hasta Suecia para poder vivir la experiencia del avión nuevo 😁 La verdad es que tuve mucha suerte, xk ya habían pospuesto el estreno en varias ocasiones. Pero sí, un avión muy bueno, sin embargo siempre voy a preferir los aviones grandes, sin importar la duración del vuelo!
Si escuchas el video, al momento de la misma compañia dar la bienvenida al vuelo de iberia, en ingles ellos mismos mencionan AIBIRIA, lo dice la misma compañia🤷♂️
Airbus already made us know how good the A321LR was with the capacity of being able to do transatlantic flights, and they now come with another aircraft that can easily take you up to cities like Havana, Dallas, Denver... truly amazing
Yes it is truly amazing if the airlines open up new routes connecting together cities that would normally require a connection. The airplane is really comfortable, smooth and quiet!
@@welcomeaboardHD
Comfortable in business. Of course it is. What a statement is it this? Try 9 hours on a narrow body in economy. In wide body you can walk and stretch as long as you want to.
Those who promote and defend small planes for 8-10 hours flights (where you can't walk, crew can't work and turbolences are much stronger) are the same criminals who defend the covid and enviromental madness etc etc. Just to get us back to the stone age.
Instead of advancing we go backward. In everything.
you don't need a 3rd ACT to do transatlantic. The A321neo with 2 ACTs can also easily do those routes
TAP AIR Portugal has been flying for over a year with the Airbus 321/LR to Boston and Newark, but also to Washington and cities in the northeast of Brazil, I don't know what's new!?!
TAP Portugal has been flying to these destinations from Lisbon for almost two years with the A321/LR...what's the surprise!?!
Good To See A321 XLR In The SKYS.I Have No Problem With Flying On The A321XLR,Nice Cabin Great Video
Thank you for your nice comment. It was actually very comfortable, really enjoyed the flight. This is just the beginning, as other Airlines will also put the A321XLR into their long haul operations.
It looks very compact and prefer A330/350 or 787
I will always prefer a widebody on any route for the thrill of it, but the business seat on this one was great, did not feel cramped at all!
At the end of the day, it's still a narrow body aircraft, and whilst the Bizz class looks combatable is also looks very claustrophobic, then at the back the normal 3x3 seating is no different than a normal A320 series aircraft, so my thoughts on flying a 7 hour Atlantic flight in a tight, claustrophobic cabin is not a world class game changer, I would still use a 787 or A350 over this to fly the same route.
I can assure you that the business class seat is really comfortable, you get a great sense of privacy. The economy seats offer the same space as on a widebody. But I’m with you, would choose a widebody all the way! Nothing like the thrill of feeling the powerful engines and the way the big birds lift their nose up!
It all depends on where you are flying from and to. It might be the case that this is a route that involves a stopover, in which case the A321XLR is potentially a game changer by offering a direct service.
POR FIN UNA GRAN AEROLÍNEA PONE UNA CLASE BUSINESS A LA ALTURA DE LA GRANDEZA ESPAÑOLA 🇪🇸 COMO AEROLÍNEA Y QUE LOS PONGA TAMBIEN A TF CON ESA CLASE BUSINESS.
Eso! 🇪🇸 Y además de eso brinda una buena imagen de la deliciosa gastronomía que tenemos!
Amazing video. I love the A321XLR, I wish to fly it in a few more years. Greeting from Punta Arenas, Chile. 🇨🇱☃️
Muchísimas gracias! Es un avión que me ha gustado mucho, a ver si lo introduce LATAM o SKY tmb :) Viva Chile!!
Amazing report! I think this was Iberia´s 3rd flight with the A321 XLR before launching their flight to Boston. I love the new business class. Looks amazing!
Thank you for the comment! The first flight was November 6th when they did Madrid-Paris-Madrid, Madrid-Paris-Madrid. This return flight from Stockholm to Madrid was on November 7th, so it makes it flight nr 6 😁
All in all a very very good experience and the seat was awesome. You feel like you have your own suite.
I Love this Trip Report on Iberia!!!!
Thank you!! / Muchas gracias!!
Excelente el avión y su video.
Muchas gracias por su comentario! La verdad que fue un avión muy cómodo, silencioso y moderno!
Your presentation is highly interesting to watch. Thank you very much and take care 😊
So nice of you, Thanks for the feedback!
POR UNA MEJOR BUTACA EN BUSINESS EN LOS A320 Y 321. IBERIA Nº1🇪🇸.
Ojalá, sería estupendo y algo increíble. Pero lamentablemente no creo que suceda. En Europa la clase business seguirá siendo así durante mucho tiempo. Sin embargo hay varias rutas donde operan aviones de fuselaje ancho:
Iberia Madrid-Londres A350
Air Europa Madrid-Barcelona, Madrid-Las Palmas y Madrid-Amsterdam B787
Finnair Helsinki-Londres, Helsinki-Amsterdam y Helsinki-Las Palmas A350
Ethiopian opera varias rutas en Europa con el B787
Singapore Airlines Milán-Barcelona A350
Good video! No shoes on the footrest though please, let more people enjoy it before the cabin gets disgusting 🤣🤣
Thank you! And yes, so sorry, you are completely right! 😅 I normally dont do that, but this time I was so excited I forgot my manners 😁
@welcomeaboardHD I Love Iberia Airlines I hope to fly with there New Airbus A321XLR Planes in the upcoming years which would be good for me since I haven't flown on a Single Aisle Across The Europe but I'll get there I'll save it on my Bucket lists.
Found the registration hilarant lol, EC-OIL (sounding like "easy oil"), funny name for a plane promising such low consumptions over so long routes lol.
If they could only extend the range for a couple of hours more, then Iberia would be able to fly most of the Americas from Madrid with this plane. With the current range, they can make the US East coast and maybe Brazil and some Caribbean destinations, as those are between 6-10 hours of flight. But Extending it to 12 hours would allow Iberia to have regular flights to the US West coast (where wide planes are harder to fill for them), half Mexico (including DF), and a lot of secondary (in terms of air traffic volume to Europe) destinations in South America.
Also I think the configuration of this plain is particularly good for the longer european routes such as the one you did. Madrid-Stockholm is around 4 hours, making it in one of these planes must be way better than making it in the average crapmpted european flight. Unfortunately that business class is not flexible enough to make it work in the long run for European flights. Would you think people would pay the extra to fly the >6 hours of a Stockholm-Tenerife flight on one of these? I know it's not Iberia's business but would be nice if IAG flew these routes with Iberia Express or Vueling using these planes.
Yes the name is cool, it means it goes easier on the oil 😁 This plane could reach great parts of the US (not the west coast), as well as Cuba, Republica Dominicana, Puerto Rico, Venezuela, parts of Colombia and Brazil. But this plane was actually intended for Aer Lingus, which is closer to the US and probably have less passenger demand. Due to agreements between pilots and unions, it was finally given to Iberia so they will make the best of it.
I fly European business quite a lot, and actually like it, despite the regular seat you get. Would of course prefer a real business class seat. And I do believe there is a market for it. Every time I fly business in Europe, the business class is full. If you can have this product on a european flight of 3 hours +, I think many would pay 400 to 500 euros. And some even more. For the shorter european flights, there is no need for this luxury, although it would be nice 😁
This plane is fantastic, like its said in Spain, «es la hostia»
Tenerife - Stockholm is a route you can fly with a regular a321.
Iberia should open new thinner transatlantic routes with the Xlr, Madrid - Boston is already served by Iberia's a330s.
They should open new routes from other Spanish cities to the US, particularly during the summer months.
WOW!.... Awesome to see this A321XLR, that business class on Iberia looks fantasic & that food you had., yummy what a feast / top quality too!. Seating looks very comfortable a longer flight would be better, as to really enjoy being on board., i'd be interested to know what the economy cabin is like maybe you could do a review on that👍🛫
Scheduled to fly this on both the IAD and BOS route next summer so very interested to see what it’s like
It was a very good experience! Although personally I will also prefer a widebody on any route, even on a short 30 min hop 😁
So cool!
The only problem with single aisle on long haul is the difficulty to get to and from the loo while food and drinks trolleys occupy the aisle, no option to move to the other aisle. I also hear that for the flight attendants the Iberia config means a very small galley considering full meal service.
Yes, you are right about that. That is a certain drawback with a single aisle aircraft on longer trips. Thanks for mentioning it, it had not crossed my mind.
Looks really decent. As an African I wish Ethiopian would replace all their current 737 Max's with this plane.
It was very nice! Would love to try Ethiopian one day!
I prefer a wide body, they are more confortable.
Yes, I also prefer a widebody, duration does not matter, 30 minutes, 10 hours 😁 But in regards to comfort, this plane/configuration/seat, was really good
Nice aircraft.But for long range routes i prefer A350 or A380.
I agree with you, but it was pretty comfortable :)
I saw your plane on fr24
Cool!
Interesting flight report 👍✈️🇷🇺
Thanks a lot! ✈️✈️
You're not going to see any a321xlr in russia airspace anytime soon haha
@@Abc0-t4t Well, that's fine. And you may see the "Sarmat" intercontinental missile soon haha
I have a checked bag 23.4 kg … will they charge for fee because of 0.4 kg more ? With Iberia economic airlines … any information , I appreciate it. From USA
Probably yes. So recommend you to place 0,4 kg in your carry-on luggage :)
@ Thank you
Iberia is not an economic airlaine. Is one of the more important and old airlaines of the world. Yanki ignorant.
I wouldn't like to travel on an 8-hour flight.
That's what wide-body ones are for.
more profit for airlines less comfort for passengers.
Great video well done. This airplane ✈️ is great because it allows Airlines to offer lie flat business class seats on short haul flights in Europe and long haul flights.
Of course there will be a price difference but if you want to experience a lie flat business class seat you will pay a higher ticket price than what you would pay for a business class seat that only offers a leg stretcher.
Demand for a lie flat business class seat for flights in Europe might actually be very high because if you want to experience a lie flat business class seat, you have to book a long haul flight which is always more expensive than a short haul.
So with the A321XLR you have a chance to experience lie flat business class seats for a short haul flight. Even if the flight is only one hour , the business class ticket will most likely be cheaper than a long haul flight and people that have never experienced a lie flat business class seat in their lives will now have a an opportunity. Even if your short haul business class flight is only one hour , you can still experience it and have a nap on the plane ✈️
Thank you for the comment! You raise some good points. My experience on this aircraft was great. The seat was better than Iberia’s Lie flat seats on their A330 and A350s.
European business class should offer a much better seat than what it does today. People are willing to pay. All the times I fly business in Europe, it is completely full, so the market is there!
@@welcomeaboardHDfor sure and I’m making up numbers here but in theory airlines like Lufthansa could charge say €240 for a business class ticket with extra legroom from Frankfurt to Madrid…. But they can also offer lie flat business class seats for €400, 00. So it gives more choices for the customers . Because on average a lie flat business class seat on a long haul flight is €3 000 - €5 000. So just for sake of experiencing business class , European airlines should definitely offer lie flat business class seats on their short haul flights and that way people that have never flown business class lie flat seats before will have a chance to experience it because lie flat business class seats are only offered on long haul wide body aircraft
Transatlantic flights with 3 toilets for 182 passengers + crew??!! Good luck to those in economy class, i.e. 2 toilets for 168 pax.
There are 3 toilets in economy and 1 in business on this aircraft. Still more passengers per toilet though
Evidently you didn't experience transatlantic jet travel in the 1960s, when all aircraft were single aisle. That was supposedly the "golden age of air travel". Personally I would have no issue with flying long haul on the A321XLR. It looks very comfortable and no doubt the fares in relative terms are a fraction of what they were in the 1960s.
No creo que afecte mucho que tenga un solo pasillo para un viaje de 7,8 o 9 horas, lo importante es la comodidad y espacio para no tener que viajar apretado como un albóndiga, que la capacidad del los compartimentos del equipaje de mano sean grandes y accesibles. Que el consumo sea bajo de un 30% menos es una gran noticia, lo que me inquieta y no me emociona, es tener un mechero de 13 toneladas de combustible debajo de mi culo.
Gracias por tu comentario. Estoy de acuerdo contigo. La comodidad en este avión está igual que en los aviones de doble pasillo. Los asientos business son lie-flat, y son buenísimos! Probé los asientos economy tb, y son iguales, con la misma distancia entre filas que los A350. Además con este tipo de avión, se podrán abrir y/o mantener rutas que de otra forma no fuera posible. Bueno, lo del mechero, espero que se haya diseñado para que jamás haya ningún inconveniente 😁
First
I will never fly a single aisle aircraft on the Atlantic run. That's too cramped.
I can't afford to put a family of 4 on an international business class flight. Even premium economy is far too overpriced.
Once I flew Stockholm/Philly on a 757. Never again.
I completely understand that! But I can assure you that the space between rows is really good, at least on this specific plane/configuration. Myself however, business or economy, I will always prefer the joy of a widebody!
What marks the difference in comfort on an aeroplane is not the width of the aircraft but the seats arrangement and configuration that a particular airline has chosen. Flying on a A380 or a 777 with 9 or 10 rows abreast, sharing the space with 600 people cramped like chicken on a factory farm has nothing to do with comfort. On the contrary, flying on a plane with little over 150 people makes the trip much more enjoyable with a distance between seats in economy class that can be the same, or even bigger, than the one on a 777. Flying in smaller aeroplanes equals more comfort, as counterintuitive as it may sound.
@@neiss2 Correct. Seat arrangement and leg room is key. Only thing I will say is that when you want to get up and move around for a bit to stretch those legs on a long haul flight the extra room in the aisles and galleys of a widebody is a big plus. Doing some leg stretches for 5 minutes in the galley/restroom area of a narrowbody is awkward at best and probably getting in the way of everyone, particularly the cabin crew.
Given the option of flying direct I have no issue if the aircraft is single aisle. What's far more important is that the seat is comfortable as I will spend most of my time seated.
Best European Business class product and food is by Turkish Airlines, no airline in Europe can top Turkish
I haven't had the pleasure of flying Turkish yet, so perhaps you are right. But I am a foodie, and Iberia's food is really great. Ticket prices are also very good compared to what you get.
@@welcomeaboardHD I fly all the time Turkish Airlines Business Class last flew Cyprus Turkish Republic from Ercan airport to istanbul A350-900 since dsgen after flew home A321Neo to Arlanda and wish Iberia switch sides real business class seats 🇹🇷🇹🇷🇹🇷🇹🇷🇹🇷🇹🇷🇹🇷🇹🇷 Next summer Stockholm Istanbul Malaga with Turkish Airlines return home Madrid Istanbul - Stockholm Arlanda connection flight will be both sides 2:45 minutes summer has Turkish has evening departure to Arlanda and morning flight to Istanbul throughout the summer TK1789 return the day after early departure 06:00 TK1790
Please stop kidding me “Iberia is known for serving one of the best food in the skies” ? That’s not true .I have flown THOUSANDS of hour and nobody, excepting if you have been paid by the airline, would say that he would’nt mind flying five more hours … it’s a commercial video.
Perhaps I should have said "in the western hemisphere". Iberia is catered by Do Co, which provides really delicious food. I have been flying on a regular basis since I was 5 years old, which has made me a fanatic of aviation and flying. If an airplane is comfortable, I don't mind spending many hours in it, and in many ways it is the highlight of all my travels. The seat on this airplane was fantastic, so I enjoyed the ride. All my flights are 100% financed by myself, so this is absolutely no commercial video, just my views, opinion and experience.
One of the best foods in the skies ???Are you crazy?☝️
It's not AIBIRIA, cojones! its I-BE-RIA ( [iˈβeɾja]) -- which sounds like [EE-BEH-RIAH]
Si lo se, pero mi inglés no es el mejor 😅 A pesar de mis errores lingüísticos, espero que te haya gustado el video 🇪🇸🇪🇸
@@welcomeaboardHD Me ha encantado el video. Me ha parecido muy bueno. Te felicito por el reportaje y la experiencia de primera mano, sortudo :).
My "rabieta" fonética ocurre porque Iberia es una palabra española, no Inglesa. Así que si los espanoles no decimos "britis airbais" sino que pronunciamos British Airways lo mejor que podemos, en inglés, no veo por que al hablar en inglés tenemos que decir 'aibiria', siendo Iberia un nombre propio, no un nombre común, con una pronunciación muy definida y sin ambigüedades. El castellano tiene una correspondencia entre lo escrito y lo hablado muy bien definida ( a diferencia del Ingles - por ejemplo, como pronuncias "read" 'rid' o 'red'? Eso en castellano no ocurre). LLevo viviendo en UK muchos anos y lo de aibiria todavía me chirría en los oídos. Y no veas como pronuncian algunos "vueling" :)))
Te doy toda la razón.. el anglicismo en el castellano no me gusta para nada, y creo que es importante evitarlo. Hace poco que empiezo a comentar en mis videos y todavía se me hace un poco extraño. Pues las palabras que tengo en mi cabeza no siempre me salen bien 😅
Vivo en el sur de Noruega y viajé hasta Suecia para poder vivir la experiencia del avión nuevo 😁 La verdad es que tuve mucha suerte, xk ya habían pospuesto el estreno en varias ocasiones. Pero sí, un avión muy bueno, sin embargo siempre voy a preferir los aviones grandes, sin importar la duración del vuelo!
Si escuchas el video, al momento de la misma compañia dar la bienvenida al vuelo de iberia, en ingles ellos mismos mencionan AIBIRIA, lo dice la misma compañia🤷♂️
@@kevinmedina7001 Exacto. Y esa misma gente no dice 'britis airbais' cuando hablan en castellano.