Decision Tree Regression Clearly Explained!

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 3 лют 2021
  • Here, I've explained how to solve a regression problem using Decision Trees in great detail. You'll also learn the math behind splitting the nodes. The next video will show you how to code a decision tree regressor from scratch.
    #machinelearning #datascience
    For more videos please subscribe -
    bit.ly/normalizedNERD
    Decision Tree previous video -
    • Decision Tree Classifi...
    Love my work? Support me -
    www.buymeacoffee.com/normaliz...
    Join our discord -
    / discord
    Facebook -
    / nerdywits
    Instagram -
    / normalizednerd
    Twitter -
    / normalized_nerd

КОМЕНТАРІ • 117

  • @jayo3074
    @jayo3074 2 роки тому +32

    It looks hard at first but with a good teacher explaining it really is so simple

  • @jamiyana4969
    @jamiyana4969 Місяць тому +1

    Honestly this is the most high end professional video that's so simply explained! Amazing job!

  • @hannav7125
    @hannav7125 2 роки тому +6

    Shout out to this dude for the awesome visualization and clearly explanation.

  • @sillem4337
    @sillem4337 Рік тому +8

    This video is next level teachning. Concept presented so clearly and so well. Thank you!

  • @rishabhgarodia410
    @rishabhgarodia410 2 роки тому +3

    Thanks for these visualizations! Helps a lot

  • @gustavoalcarde
    @gustavoalcarde Рік тому +2

    Thank you so much! Very simple and visual, that's all I needed!

  • @saigopal5086
    @saigopal5086 Рік тому +3

    brooooooo this is brilliant, I can't resist myself from pressing the like button, it's such a blessing to have people like you

  • @aminbakhtiari3026
    @aminbakhtiari3026 Рік тому +1

    that was quite understandable ! thanks for the good explanation and visualization!

  • @Ivan-cp2hn
    @Ivan-cp2hn 2 роки тому +4

    your explanation is so far the best in youtube up till now. Dont know why the view number and likes counts not that high. But keep doing the great work !

  • @himtyagi9740
    @himtyagi9740 2 роки тому +1

    What a beautiful lecture..kudos to your efforts

  • @jullienbeaufondcamacho2055
    @jullienbeaufondcamacho2055 9 місяців тому

    Excellent visualization, kudos!

  • @prashantmandare2875
    @prashantmandare2875 Рік тому

    Best explanation of decision tree for regression that I have come across

  • @pratyushrout7904
    @pratyushrout7904 Рік тому

    The nicest explanation video for DT on UA-cam...

  • @persevere1052
    @persevere1052 3 місяці тому

    Extremely helpful and easy to understand!

  • @akshaypr9164
    @akshaypr9164 3 місяці тому

    amazing man!! love your explanation and style

  • @fabianaltendorfer11
    @fabianaltendorfer11 8 місяців тому

    one hell of a explanation video. great!

  • @rishiksarkar62
    @rishiksarkar62 2 роки тому

    Fabulous explanation sir! Thank you very much!!

  • @senthil_the_analyst
    @senthil_the_analyst 2 роки тому

    Quality content... I never seen before 💯

  • @dgaphysics4026
    @dgaphysics4026 3 місяці тому

    Great explanation!

  • @itsme1674
    @itsme1674 Рік тому

    Wonderful explanation

  • @diabl2master
    @diabl2master 4 місяці тому

    What a brilliant video!!

  • @kajalmishra6895
    @kajalmishra6895 2 роки тому

    I love all your videos.

  • @HuyLe-nn5ft
    @HuyLe-nn5ft Рік тому

    You already had 1 more subsciption, Superb explanation and visualization!

  • @leolei9352
    @leolei9352 2 роки тому

    Really good teaching.

  • @mihirsheth9918
    @mihirsheth9918 2 роки тому

    great explaination.thanks

  • @jamalnuman
    @jamalnuman 3 місяці тому

    great presentation

  • @Rahul.alpha.Mishra
    @Rahul.alpha.Mishra 3 місяці тому

    Thanks a lot bro. And your viz helped me explain my Model in the presentation. Carry on foreward

  • @ahmedelsabagh6990
    @ahmedelsabagh6990 2 роки тому

    Very good visualizations

  • @RohitAlexKoshy
    @RohitAlexKoshy 3 роки тому

    Great video. Keep up the good work!

  • @kalpanakadirvel9220
    @kalpanakadirvel9220 2 роки тому

    Excellent video.. Thank you

  • @osama11osama
    @osama11osama 3 місяці тому

    I like it really, thanks

  • @estefvasqu
    @estefvasqu 3 роки тому

    Thank you for sharing your knowledge. We appreciate it
    Greetings from Argentina

  • @kellymarchisio377
    @kellymarchisio377 Рік тому

    Excellent!

  • @Nirjhar85
    @Nirjhar85 Рік тому

    Awesome!

  • @soniasnia
    @soniasnia 2 роки тому

    ur video is just awesome!

  • @illan731
    @illan731 2 місяці тому

    Great explanation. Feels too simple to have looked up on video, which means it is explained very well.

  • @SachinModi9
    @SachinModi9 Рік тому

    Man... Loved it..

  • @takeshi7441
    @takeshi7441 17 днів тому

    Thank you sir

  • @samarthtandale9121
    @samarthtandale9121 Рік тому

    Incredible 🔥

  • @Mudiaga11
    @Mudiaga11 Рік тому

    this is excellent

  • @user-ll8dr9bm5v
    @user-ll8dr9bm5v 6 місяців тому +4

    Can you explain why X0

    • @Samwka_
      @Samwka_ 3 місяці тому +1

      8:24 He explains that the algorithm compares every possible split and finds the one with the best variance reduction. So the y in X0

  • @sadjiajfiarei3498
    @sadjiajfiarei3498 Рік тому

    bro you made it so easy

  • @Asmallpanda1
    @Asmallpanda1 2 роки тому

    Very Nice ty

  • @yashsaxena7754
    @yashsaxena7754 Рік тому +2

    Great explanation! One question though is if the prediction is based on the average value of the target variable in the leaf node, it would mean that all the observations terminating at a node will have the same prediction. Is that right? For e.g., if 10 observations are terminating at a leaf node all will have the same predictions.

  • @saqlainshaikh5483
    @saqlainshaikh5483 3 роки тому

    Great Expectations ✌️

  • @MrHardgabi
    @MrHardgabi 3 роки тому

    incredible

  • @yuyang5575
    @yuyang5575 3 роки тому +12

    This is awesome! Clearly we use a binary tree to do the classification first (or build a decision tree first), and then we follow the tree to reach the target leaf node. Btw, which software do you use to make the animation? very impressive

    • @NormalizedNerd
      @NormalizedNerd  3 роки тому +4

      Thanks! Well, I use Manim (a python library)

  • @siddhantpathak6289
    @siddhantpathak6289 2 роки тому +1

    Awesome visualization and explanation, I went through the Github implementation and it seems you are using unique feature values as possible thresholds. How this approach would work for a continuous feature with millions of records, as there will be many unique values to test.
    Possible thresholds in the video were 1 and 2, right? Just checking my understanding.

  • @yuvikayadav8203
    @yuvikayadav8203 11 місяців тому

    Great explanation! Just one doubt that in decision tree classifier we split the nodes until we get pure leaf nodes if hyperparameters are not clearly stated but in the case of regression problems how do it decide when to stop generating the tree if no hyperparameter is defined?

  • @razieqilham8327
    @razieqilham8327 2 роки тому

    So in love with your explanation sir, but im confused with the dataset, could u build a dataset in table, not graph?

  • @mindlessambient1791
    @mindlessambient1791 2 роки тому

    In the ending example, the weighted average of variance used weights with denominators of 20 (i.e. 11/20, 9/20, etc.) . Has anyone ever thought to adjust these weights using Bessel's correction? Not sure how much of a difference that would make but just curious. I am guessing that the weights would be something like 10/19 and 8/19 with this adjustment.

  • @alexandrfedorov7297
    @alexandrfedorov7297 11 місяців тому

    You are awesome

  • @polishettysairam6466
    @polishettysairam6466 2 роки тому

    Its good, can you provide the dataset used here

  • @ckeong9012
    @ckeong9012 2 місяці тому

    Awesome. May i know what kind of software you use for the visualization?

  • @ckeong9012
    @ckeong9012 3 роки тому +1

    Awesome. Great video. Much appreciated if you could put the values or labels on the cartesian. TQ~

  • @ismailwangde580
    @ismailwangde580 Рік тому

    Bro, you are better than krish naik lol. Thank you for the efforts. really appreciate it

  • @madhumatinarule4489
    @madhumatinarule4489 2 роки тому

    Kindly make full course on fundamentals of machine learning as we are from not from computer science

  • @61_shivangbhardwaj46
    @61_shivangbhardwaj46 3 роки тому

    Thnx sir😊

  • @smartshoppingapp3585
    @smartshoppingapp3585 2 роки тому

    How do you find the best root node. ? Coz in video it's about finding the best split which really helped.
    But how to find the best root node???

  • @diegobarrientos6271
    @diegobarrientos6271 Рік тому +3

    Thanks for the explanation!, I have a question... I watched in some videos that use MSE instead of variance, so Should I use the sum of squared error or variance? It'd be great of someone could clarify this please

    • @DaaniaKhalith
      @DaaniaKhalith Рік тому +1

      MSE is used if both input and output is continuous ,variance is for discrete input n continuous output

  • @suryahr307
    @suryahr307 Місяць тому

    does it take care of outlier data points?

  • @nickgeo8250
    @nickgeo8250 11 місяців тому

    Really good explanation well done! Only one question, how do you calculate the wi weights?

    • @AidarMHTV
      @AidarMHTV 10 місяців тому

      The weights, I think, it's just a fraction of items for each side.
      For example, 2 items on left and 6 items on right gives .25 and 0.75 weights respectively.

  • @sai_sh
    @sai_sh Рік тому

    Hi at 4:40 why did it go towards left node rather than the right coz x=16 and x

  • @candicerusser9095
    @candicerusser9095 2 роки тому +1

    Hi, great video! A small doubt, what does "desired depth" mean in decision tree regressor, does it mean that we reach a point where we can't split anymore, like variance becomes 0?

    • @jakeezetci
      @jakeezetci 2 роки тому

      i think that's the depth of the tree you want, that you need to find by trying out yourself. you want to stop before variance becomes 0, as then the prediction really goes wild

  • @subarnasubedi7938
    @subarnasubedi7938 9 місяців тому

    I am confused why you took x2

  • @bhavinmoriya9216
    @bhavinmoriya9216 2 роки тому +7

    Thanks for the video! How do you decide x0

    • @NormalizedNerd
      @NormalizedNerd  2 роки тому +1

      Actually, we try every possible value of the threshold and find which one produces the best split. If can go through the code for a better understanding. github.com/Suji04/ML_from_Scratch/blob/master/decision%20tree%20regression.ipynb

    • @bhavinmoriya9216
      @bhavinmoriya9216 2 роки тому

      @@NormalizedNerd Thanks buddy :)

    • @kalam_indian
      @kalam_indian 2 роки тому +1

      @@NormalizedNerd
      you have done well but plz first explain taking an example by showing every steps from first to the last with every maths used and the computation on how we get the results and why this value and not the other etc.
      plz teach like this so that every learner even the one who don't have basic can understand
      it is a request

  • @Randomstiontastic
    @Randomstiontastic 3 роки тому +1

    How do you find the value of the inequalities for the filters?

    • @NormalizedNerd
      @NormalizedNerd  3 роки тому

      By checking every possible value of a feature as the threshold and splitting the dataset based on that. Then taking that particular feature and the corresponding threshold that gives the maximum information gain. Please see the code provided in the next video for more clarity.

  • @inderkaur3012
    @inderkaur3012 2 роки тому +1

    Hi, Though Var R1>Var R2, how do we conclude that R2 is best suited for split? Graphically I understand your logic as the colors are best segregated due to R1, we must choose R1, but I was unable to conclude the same from variance perspective. Could you please explain the same?

    • @konstantinosmaravegias4198
      @konstantinosmaravegias4198 Рік тому +2

      Do not confuse the variance reduction with the variance of each split. VarR1 < VarR2, hence the VarR1 split reduces more variance from the parent node (1 - VarR1 > 1 - Var2)

  • @sebastiaanvanhassel4664
    @sebastiaanvanhassel4664 3 роки тому +1

    One extra like for the classical music!!! 👏😀

  • @anuragshrivastava7855
    @anuragshrivastava7855 Рік тому

    how did we get average

  • @gatecseaspirant-dk9ze
    @gatecseaspirant-dk9ze Рік тому

    hello people from the future! you nailed it here

  • @tinyeinmoe5147
    @tinyeinmoe5147 Місяць тому

    you're the best, thank you Soooo much, india is the best

  • @XuanTran-ri1hn
    @XuanTran-ri1hn 2 роки тому +1

    Hi, may I ask 1 thing in minute 4:41, because x=16, so I think that condition is not true for x1

    • @explovictinischool2234
      @explovictinischool2234 2 місяці тому

      This condition is, indeed, true.
      You may have confused x0 and x1:
      x0 = 16 but x1 = -2. Here, we are talking about x1

  • @akashkundu4520
    @akashkundu4520 Рік тому

    Can you add post prunning of the tree and visual representation of the tree please.I have an assignment 😭

  • @robm838
    @robm838 2 роки тому

    Which values are -7 and -12 cannot be found on the grid.

  • @xINeXuSlx
    @xINeXuSlx 3 роки тому

    Great video! Helping me a lot in preparing for my Data Science exam soon. One thing I did not quite understand yet is when I should use Decision Tree Classification or Regression? I understand that one uses Information Gain and the other Variance Reduction, but how do I know in the first place what to apply?

    • @NormalizedNerd
      @NormalizedNerd  3 роки тому +1

      It depends on the problem you are trying to solve. As a thumb rule: if the target variable takes continuous values then go for regression and if it takes discrete (and few) values then go for classification.

    • @xINeXuSlx
      @xINeXuSlx 3 роки тому

      @@NormalizedNerd I understand, thanks a lot :)

  • @JPDEV092
    @JPDEV092 25 днів тому

    how to do videos like this ?

  • @tomgt428
    @tomgt428 3 роки тому

    cool

  • @asrjy
    @asrjy 3 роки тому

    Sick vid! Did you use manim to make this video?

  • @kalam_indian
    @kalam_indian 2 роки тому

    you have done well but plz first explain taking an example by showing every steps from first to the last with every maths used and the computation on how we get the results and why this value and not the other etc.
    plz teach like this so that every learner even the one who don't have basic can understand
    it is a request

  • @piero8284
    @piero8284 Рік тому

    Nice explanation, i was struggling a little bit to find some detailed material about this topic. As I thought, decision Trees in general always check for the best split looking for every possible feature, that means if there are k features and n samples, at each split the tree will perform O(m*k) variance computations, right?

    • @p337maB
      @p337maB Рік тому

      It's not O(m*k) but exactly m*k computations at every split.

    • @piero8284
      @piero8284 Рік тому

      @@p337maB sure

  • @Rehul-gw3yj
    @Rehul-gw3yj 11 місяців тому

    I actually came here to understand how we get the route note. anyone >?

  • @paultvshow
    @paultvshow 2 місяці тому

    At 1.28, what you mentioned was misleading and could be misinterpreted. A line is still a line in 2D, a line will never be a plane in 2D. You should have said “or a plane in 3D”, or simply call it a hyperplane instead of a line or plane.

  • @ronitganguly3318
    @ronitganguly3318 Рік тому

    Dada tumi bangali?😁

  • @ccuuttww
    @ccuuttww 3 роки тому

    U spend a lot of time to make an animation

    • @ccuuttww
      @ccuuttww 3 роки тому

      I am not sure if u should use MSE for every split

  • @DustinGunnells
    @DustinGunnells 3 роки тому

    How are you determining the filter splits further down from the root of the tree? I don't see the reasoning that you're using to make this useful. I see the filtering, I see data points, but what is determining the other filters from the initial filter? Why is the partitioning valuable? How would the partitioning be applied? Why would you have two of the same filter between the two x variables, x sub 0 and x sub 1? Why is x sub zero represented in the root but not x sub 1? What is the relationship/difference between the two x variables? This looks initially useful, then it looks like a bunch of snow on a cathode.

    • @NormalizedNerd
      @NormalizedNerd  3 роки тому

      "but what is determining the other filters from the initial filter?"
      The initial filter (at root) divides the data into two sets. The left one is then again divided so is the right one. We do this process recursively. While splitting a set we choose the condition that maximizes variance reduction. Please see the implementation to get more clarity: ua-cam.com/video/P2ZB8c5Ha1Q/v-deo.html

    • @DustinGunnells
      @DustinGunnells 3 роки тому

      @@NormalizedNerd So are you saying that x sub 0 and x sub 1 are two sets of decision sets? Rather, two collections of boundaries? Something still looks off. If it's an array of decision boundaries, how do you jump from 1 (of x sub 0) to -7 and -12 (of x sub 1)? I've even tried to figure out the symmetry in the tree to find logic. 4 elements of x sub 1 3 elements of x sub 0. 20 partitions in the grid for 20 elements in the set. I've watched several of your videos trying to understand your message. Explain this one where it makes sense and I'll definitely continue to watch your other content. I try to give everybody that says they're providing "knowledge" a chance. This is outstandingly bonkers to me. I'm also a programmer and MBA

  • @dnyaneshjalamkar4257
    @dnyaneshjalamkar4257 2 роки тому

    Your so called autopilot ruined the video!

  • @Gulshankumar-fg9ls
    @Gulshankumar-fg9ls Рік тому

    Bro… I would suggest you to get the proper knowledge when you start teaching any topic in machin learning, sometimes your statement is vague