Why the World's Biggest Ship is an AWFUL Idea

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 12 кві 2021
  • Watch this video ad-free on Nebula: nebula.tv/videos/real-life-lo...
    Please Subscribe: / @reallifelore
    Select video clips courtesy of Getty Images

КОМЕНТАРІ • 9 тис.

  • @blizzbee
    @blizzbee 3 роки тому +5247

    Back of the ship: (waving goodbye from NewYork)
    Front of ship: "we are approaching London now"

  • @boarbot7829
    @boarbot7829 3 роки тому +14647

    “ the biggest boat that has ever been imagined” well guess what- i just imagined a bigger one!

    • @GreenBlueWalkthrough
      @GreenBlueWalkthrough 3 роки тому +271

      And milers... Mile-long Aircraft carriers and battleships.

    • @mammothcow
      @mammothcow 3 роки тому +403

      How about a boat that is a light-year long lol

    • @walterbrunswick
      @walterbrunswick 3 роки тому +330

      "Stupidity knows no bounds"

    • @Garbagejuicewaterfall
      @Garbagejuicewaterfall 3 роки тому +312

      @@mammothcow I don’t want to get too technical, but a ship that big would be too bendy.

    • @DapperHesher
      @DapperHesher 3 роки тому +61

      Yeah, but can your wealth afford similarly shitty renderings of the thing, LOL!

  • @darksayan
    @darksayan 2 роки тому +291

    So you're telling me, to avoid paying taxes, some people would like to live on a boat, to pay for accommodation, fuel, electricity, water treatment, post services, security, ship crew, food for that crew, maintaining ship infrastructure, medical facilities, schools, setup up rules of conduct? Good thing those are not taxes.

    • @railroadisolationist5452
      @railroadisolationist5452 Рік тому +32

      At least that would be a fixed cost and not a percentage of income

    • @aoh4905
      @aoh4905 Рік тому +7

      Well for the rich that's nothing lol. That's the point. It's not for us normies

    • @jayheche6688
      @jayheche6688 Рік тому +4

      @@railroadisolationist5452 still taxes though...

    • @ChristopherGuilday
      @ChristopherGuilday Рік тому +6

      Yeah and it would still be massively massively cheaper than what they pay in a country. You’re talking about costs that pertain to 60,000 people rather than 330,000,000 people.
      The rich pay most of the taxes, their tax burden would be like 1/50th of the cost.

    • @Itried20takennames
      @Itried20takennames Рік тому +1

      Hah…I was about to post almost the exact same comment, so I think you are smart.

  • @XXXkazeXXX
    @XXXkazeXXX 2 роки тому +360

    Everybody's talking about the ship itself but I'm here just wondering how on earth would the people ever be able to visit any country the ship's visiting. Since, you know, the idea was that people could give up their citizenships. I imagine it's quite difficult to visit a country without a passport.

    • @noahcarter3868
      @noahcarter3868 2 роки тому +54

      Ship creates its own passport and rich people lobby it be accepted.

    • @rossn646
      @rossn646 2 роки тому +8

      @@noahcarter3868 why would they need this ship? they all already have yachts, if it was that easy the could make a country of one.

    • @mabhatter4294
      @mabhatter4294 2 роки тому +22

      @@noahcarter3868 the gave up for citizenships for shipships?

    • @daftwulli6145
      @daftwulli6145 2 роки тому +12

      You do not actually have to give up your citizenship for something like this. Many people hold citizenship in more then one country, and usually you pay taxes depending on where your permanent residence is (determined by where you live the majority of the year).

    • @KlaxontheImpailr
      @KlaxontheImpailr 2 роки тому +5

      @@daftwulli6145 not to mention that if you spend 6 months or more living outside your country you don’t have to pay taxes for that year in your country, at least that’s what I’ve been told.

  • @flightsimulatorlad6664
    @flightsimulatorlad6664 3 роки тому +7763

    putting the world's most powerful people on a predictable schedule and route is totally a great idea!

    • @the_rover1
      @the_rover1 3 роки тому +384

      pff, what do you expect from crazy religious shepperds sitting in caves in far east? hijacking planes with curtain knifes and precisely pilot them into towers? or sinking a ridiculous large vessel?
      no way! 🙄

    • @hunterG60k
      @hunterG60k 3 роки тому +905

      Exactly what I was thinking! We can get rid of them all in one go 😈

    • @imogens7281
      @imogens7281 3 роки тому +434

      @@hunterG60k Slowly chugging past South Africa like that seems like a great way to get hit by a rogue wave, maybe we would've just had to wait 😂

    • @JJAB91
      @JJAB91 3 роки тому +55

      @@hunterG60k Jealous much?

    • @mechanomics2649
      @mechanomics2649 3 роки тому +401

      @@JJAB91 Temporary embarrassed millionaire much?

  • @lebronjamesburner334
    @lebronjamesburner334 3 роки тому +3042

    Let’s not forget about the security costs either, that much rich people all concentrated together in a slow moving target in the middle of the ocean is bound to attract a couple of pirates at least

    • @ssgoko88
      @ssgoko88 3 роки тому +60

      What? Explain yourself or delete your comment. Your saying a bunch of starving ethiopians are going to the middle of the pacific to hold up the biggest ship in the world- with a permanent population? Not to mention the police force the ship would have as well.
      I don't think it's anything they would need to be concerned about. You know where the pacific is right?

    • @istyl2525
      @istyl2525 3 роки тому +745

      @@ssgoko88 did you see the route rll showed in the video? The route passes by the somali coast. Also Ethiopia is landlocked

    • @yumm186
      @yumm186 3 роки тому +521

      @@ssgoko88 bro Ethiopia doesn't have any coasts, it is landlocked. Would be hard for them to be pirate

    • @uberbosst
      @uberbosst 3 роки тому +39

      i guess fighting pirates in the ocean makes it worth it.

    • @totmgsrockxd9900
      @totmgsrockxd9900 3 роки тому +272

      @@istyl2525 Somalia is the location of worry. Pirates are a concern there. All they would need is a few well-placed explosives to take the ship hostage, or make whole ship go boom. Super large ships need lots of fuel and fuel is flammable.

  • @Zombie_Knuckles
    @Zombie_Knuckles 2 роки тому +50

    its called the freedom ship, but you cant really leave and you have to wait for a crew member to take you to land by boat or plane

    • @PaulGuy
      @PaulGuy Рік тому +5

      And if you renounced your citizenship, now you can't enter most countries, since you don't have a valid passport anymore.

  • @Zenobiwan
    @Zenobiwan 2 роки тому +51

    i imagine that if such a ship were ever fully built and worked exactly as intended there'd be quite a lot of countries imposing sanction on such a vessel

    • @NickanM
      @NickanM 4 місяці тому

      Hej 😊😊😊

  • @prime8nate
    @prime8nate 3 роки тому +5612

    As a Somali pirate, I am really hoping they can overcome any obstacles and get this exciting project afloat soon!
    Edit: Your fictional solutions to thwart my fictional piracy are all lame. Prepare to be boarded.

    • @user-fy5sg9rg7d
      @user-fy5sg9rg7d 3 роки тому +58

      Yup

    • @prime8nate
      @prime8nate 3 роки тому +153

      @People of China live free and destroy the CCP People of China live in solidarity and prosper under wise leadership of Xi Jinping and destroy libertarian freedom boat with glorious people’s navy.

    • @prime8nate
      @prime8nate 3 роки тому +70

      @People of China live free and destroy the CCP The People's Liberation Army Navy's array of future artificial reefs will gloriously puncture the hull and sink the Tax Dodging Future Dream Boat regardless of how much money the libertarians spend or mercs with money that is in no way a tax.

    • @flow185
      @flow185 3 роки тому +14

      I was going to point that out. Gonna be a field day for you.

    • @kianster9529
      @kianster9529 3 роки тому +49

      As a Djiboutian pirate, same

  • @ignaciobenito7284
    @ignaciobenito7284 3 роки тому +2630

    All im seeing here is: Worlds biggest ransom payment when a group of mercenaries show up.

    • @uberbosst
      @uberbosst 3 роки тому +215

      considering it's an ancap society every resident will have guns. rough time for pirates

    • @4JBrewer
      @4JBrewer 3 роки тому +194

      @@uberbosst AND the ship will have its own Coast Guard, which it will need for sailing past Somalia.

    • @-joo3033
      @-joo3033 3 роки тому +105

      @@4JBrewer GL taking over a ship with 20000 crew members...

    • @maybenat
      @maybenat 3 роки тому +144

      A ship like this is still a very vulnerable target, even with a fuckton of security around and onboard

    • @1nv15BL3
      @1nv15BL3 3 роки тому +12

      @@4JBrewer Nuclear torpedoes exist

  • @markalexander774
    @markalexander774 2 роки тому +38

    Assuming this is possible, which is a fat assumption, this would be the world's largest terrorist attack target. The way the design is now, it would take a lot to sink it, but it would be absolutely possible, and probably not that hard. How many USS Cole style attacks could this withstand? Four men on four different small boats loaded with explosives ramming it at critical points would likely bring this to the bottom of the ocean, and that would be hard to defend against.

    • @FLAMEalan
      @FLAMEalan Рік тому +1

      Only an American would think of a terrorist attack as its first issue they would face 😂

    • @cIoudbank
      @cIoudbank Рік тому

      @@FLAMEalan more like only people with a brain. If u have trees and oil stockpiled that's just a giant bomb waiting to go off.

    • @Nebulasecura
      @Nebulasecura Рік тому +5

      @@FLAMEalan you do realize other countries have had terrorist attacks too right?

    • @ShriveledSpleen
      @ShriveledSpleen 8 місяців тому +1

      ​@@FLAMEalanIt would still be one of the biggest risks.

    • @FLAMEalan
      @FLAMEalan 8 місяців тому

      @@Nebulasecura You must be stupid if you think I don’t know that. I bet you didn’t know about the numerous terrorist attacks in China performed by the certain Uighur Muslims 🤷🏽‍♂️ But yet you guys don’t like the camp they made to correct people who are suspected to be a part of the organisations behind the attacks

  • @xxxggthyf
    @xxxggthyf 2 роки тому +5

    I can foresee a few small problems with renouncing all of your citizenships to avoid taxes. 1) In most countries your obligation to pay taxes doesn't depend on you being a citizen. 2) Some places don't officially recognise renunciation of citizenship and 3) Even if they do most of them only recognise renunciation if you are citizen of somewhere else. Not if it would make you stateless.

  • @ShummaAwilum
    @ShummaAwilum 3 роки тому +2692

    I think the worst part of living on this thing is that all of your neighbors would be the kind of people who would move to a big floating island to avoid taxes.

    • @Kukainis
      @Kukainis 3 роки тому +158

      you spelled "best part" wrong

    • @towakin7718
      @towakin7718 3 роки тому +82

      You mean people you could have an intelligent conversation with, and that wouldn't mug you? Yeah, sounds terrible...

    • @edopronk1303
      @edopronk1303 3 роки тому +295

      @@towakin7718 and are very egoistic, selfish and not at all social.
      For the money, I would want to be a lawyer on that ship

    • @ShummaAwilum
      @ShummaAwilum 3 роки тому +88

      @Kukainis @Towakin, I rest my case.

    • @towakin7718
      @towakin7718 3 роки тому +82

      ​@@edopronk1303 I disagree. I always found people who advocate for a state to take money and do whatever with it to be the most egoistic, selfish and not at all social.
      Poor people want the money to be given to them, rich people who advocate for it want it as a weapon agains competition. Both groups talk that crap to make them appear as morally superior. Not ever have I found a single person of good character advocate for high taxes.

  • @Agent_B0771E
    @Agent_B0771E 3 роки тому +4536

    To put that in perspective: **Proceeds to use a mall in Washington that most people have no idea about it's size**

    • @lego856
      @lego856 2 роки тому +86

      Well it's measurements were put into meters already so.....

    • @utavtakt9361
      @utavtakt9361 2 роки тому +204

      ....and use the population of Greenland, THE WORLDS BIGGEST ISLAND as an example! XD

    • @underhillat
      @underhillat 2 роки тому +356

      That's the problem with this channel. He is awful at putting things into perspective.

    • @bruhbutwhytho2301
      @bruhbutwhytho2301 2 роки тому +37

      @@underhillat yeah he seems to put a lot of effort into it also

    • @davidvandersterre
      @davidvandersterre 2 роки тому +56

      Just compare the size of the Mall to about two freedom ships.

  • @Techischannel
    @Techischannel 2 роки тому +34

    At this point you might aswell make a cluster of smaller ships that float on the ocean. Maybe somewhere near a geothermaly active area for underwater geothermal power. Add some fish farms and whatnot around it. Viola a tax haven like nothing else and its save from flooding too. I mean until the ship eventually breaks.

  • @goldenretriever6440
    @goldenretriever6440 Рік тому +11

    A more realistic idea would be to build several smaller versions of this ship and have them sail in a convoy
    And of course having ferries to get people to each ship
    It’s still a floating city just built in more manageable sections

    • @Your_Local_Nerd
      @Your_Local_Nerd 5 місяців тому

      that would be smart, imagine all of them connecting so that passengers can walk to other ships

  • @abraxas365
    @abraxas365 3 роки тому +1771

    I went to college to be a naval architect. I distinctly remember sending this guy my resume when I graduated cause I had no standards and I needed a damn job.

    • @Charles-SG
      @Charles-SG 3 роки тому +88

      No standards no probs

    • @MrCurbinator
      @MrCurbinator 3 роки тому +52

      Any chance you want to pay it forward and hire someone with tons of passion and zero qualifications beyond navigation 😁

    • @deebte__
      @deebte__ 3 роки тому +2

      amazing

    • @abraxas365
      @abraxas365 3 роки тому +20

      @@MrCurbinator Be a river pilot. They make bank.

    • @omar.v
      @omar.v 3 роки тому +9

      Sounds like a super niche market did you find a long term job as a naval architect yet

  • @sleghart
    @sleghart 3 роки тому +5125

    this is basically Wall-E's spaceship in the form of a... uh... ship

    • @xd3dputra408
      @xd3dputra408 3 роки тому +36

      Flippin true

    • @nintony2994
      @nintony2994 3 роки тому +48

      Except it's on the Water!

    • @Kiarean
      @Kiarean 3 роки тому +81

      Are we sure this isn't actually the original inspiration for Wall-E? That whoever at Pixar hadn't once heard about this thing and that's where the initial seed for the story came from?

    • @omarvi280
      @omarvi280 2 роки тому +14

      @@Kiarean It's probable.

    • @deadmemes21
      @deadmemes21 2 роки тому +15

      It’s a spaceship without the space.

  • @TheGamingSyndrom
    @TheGamingSyndrom 2 роки тому +9

    has anyone ever thought about the noisepollution and vibrations of being underneath a giant airport?

  • @pedrohdalla
    @pedrohdalla 2 роки тому +4

    "without paying any taxes to anyone again"
    except to the ship's owners lol

  • @airsuperset
    @airsuperset 3 роки тому +3281

    this boat sounds like something I would think of when I was 6

    • @zephan6001
      @zephan6001 2 роки тому +78

      I dreamed this exact boat up when I was like 7

    • @adamshaikh8856
      @adamshaikh8856 2 роки тому +48

      Me who built this in mc

    • @vbvol
      @vbvol 2 роки тому +6

      Yeah

    • @lowkeybear10
      @lowkeybear10 2 роки тому +59

      You thought of evading taxes when you were six?

    • @lowkeybear10
      @lowkeybear10 2 роки тому +13

      Darkfairy true true

  • @mammothcow
    @mammothcow 3 роки тому +569

    This is a perfect example of "your scientists were so preoccupied with whether they could or couldn't, they didn't stop to think if they should."

    • @artdecotimes2942
      @artdecotimes2942 3 роки тому +13

      Explains most architecture in these days. 111west57th, 432parkavenue, Burj Khalifa and most buildings in Qatar which are just a greedy inhuman just built up area of their troubling city layout and horrid weather for a city, terrible childish construction, and slavery carried from fathers in Nepal. There's also 700 other glass "art" pieces being shoved into Chicago, Manhattan, San Francisco, Hollywood, Florida, France, London especially, Guangzhou and Shanghai, Seoul, Singapore, and Africa which is a whole entire other tragic story with their oasis city.... their delusional... Wish they could of had their happy moments like america in the 20th century, understanding what having wealth means better than the hellscape they are turning their cities into thanks to immaturity to a surplus of self made choices and the large addition digital technology has plagued our ideals with for a beneficial future. These days, our scientists are just people who used to play on an arcade, and our architects are kids that watched too many scifi movies, a lack of care for are historical background only thinking forward and wanting, instead of what we already have. We don't need a PS5, a virtual reality set, 5G and a Tesla (not as though that is anything impressive), Alexa to tell you the weather, a bot to turn your Christmas tree on, a self driving vehicle is pathetic, uber pickup because the thing you go to meant for easy lazy people called a drive through, wasn't enough apparently, and a fit boy when half of the people today can barely keep fit and usually only wear it as a piece of jewelry because nothing says leisurely like a hot pink artificial band with a ominous glossy black square in the center listing all the things it knows about you.

    • @DeanFernandezzz
      @DeanFernandezzz 3 роки тому +6

      Ohh nice quote from jurassic park, love it

    • @tomasbickel58
      @tomasbickel58 3 роки тому +3

      They should build that thing. Imagine the satisfaction, sinking that thing with all on board.

    • @tomasbickel58
      @tomasbickel58 3 роки тому +3

      Ok .. the crew issue needs to be worked out first.

    • @artdecotimes2942
      @artdecotimes2942 3 роки тому

      @@tomasbickel58 getting off those medications should be the first and last step

  • @TheChangNetwork
    @TheChangNetwork 2 роки тому +7

    I mean they can dodge taxes but its really because they aren't using any benefits from the taxes (i.e. police, hospitals etc) anyways, so I don't think there's much wrong with that. If the pirates get them, just don't expect any military to help either LOL.

  • @Steambull1
    @Steambull1 2 роки тому +11

    I remember reading about this in a monthly science magazine back in 1999 or 2000. I was in elementary school and still somewhat fond of cruise ships, so there was a fascination to the idea, though I was skeptical about it becoming reality. Through the years since, I don't think I ever heard about it again until this video.

  • @AuroraJadefyre
    @AuroraJadefyre 3 роки тому +2549

    boats are nice

  • @qblog_
    @qblog_ 3 роки тому +2407

    If everyone in the world would send them $1 to make this ship, it would still be not enough.

    • @GiantsRTheBest1
      @GiantsRTheBest1 3 роки тому +220

      But if everyone sent $10 we would have enough with a lot left over.

    • @SdoubleA
      @SdoubleA 3 роки тому +419

      @@GiantsRTheBest1 In some countries $10 is a hell of a lot of money for the average person

    • @KingCrow404
      @KingCrow404 3 роки тому +96

      @@SdoubleA well some people can pay more, government spends 50x times that in a week

    • @totally_no_hakss3332
      @totally_no_hakss3332 3 роки тому +75

      What about $2

    • @fissis1955
      @fissis1955 3 роки тому +57

      @@KingCrow404 we should spend some more in fusion energy, then we can build this

  • @benjaminmarshall5071
    @benjaminmarshall5071 2 роки тому +6

    This seems like a great idea to get seized by any nation with any navy at all. There are a lot of nations that would like to nationalize something that expensive, or take the passengers captive for ransom or tax. And since none of them would have citizenship, it wouldn’t even cause a diplomatic incident.

  • @joshuarosen465
    @joshuarosen465 2 роки тому +5

    Could you imagine sentencing yourself to life on a prison ship? The only way to avoid US taxes is to transfer all of your money out of the country without the government noticing and then renouncing your citizenship. With no passport you can't leave that ship, you are stuck on it for life.

  • @zoopdterdoobdter5743
    @zoopdterdoobdter5743 3 роки тому +1238

    The most surprising part of this design was that it wasn't planned to be nuclear powered. 😏

    • @Ratkill
      @Ratkill 3 роки тому +47

      Your name and pic just made me shoot red bull out my nose

    • @lightinghound
      @lightinghound 3 роки тому +27

      Agreed it is quite an omission

    • @goonerOZZ
      @goonerOZZ 3 роки тому +74

      Honestly, I don't think it's possible for a non-government entity to build a nuclear powered anything?
      Maybe I am wrong, but it could be very dangerous for a nuclear power plant to be out in the open without any military protection...
      Just my thoughts...

    • @tg-dg1zr
      @tg-dg1zr 3 роки тому +45

      @@goonerOZZ nuke power plants are private not military

    • @lightinghound
      @lightinghound 3 роки тому +71

      @@goonerOZZ That is not an issue when you are designing such a vessel. Building yes. Using yes. Dangerous oh yes but Running a ship of this size on disel is the most insane part. It would need a tanker refilling it constantly just to keep it stable. No wonder it is still in the design stage.

  • @cursedhawkins1305
    @cursedhawkins1305 2 роки тому +1125

    This kind of ship that screams “hey pirates there’s wealthy people on board come and get them”

    • @colinsmith1495
      @colinsmith1495 2 роки тому +164

      I have to imagine there would be security. And seeing as they're staying in international waters, that security can have machine guns and surface-to-water missiles.

    • @Joemamahahahaha821
      @Joemamahahahaha821 2 роки тому +4

      @@colinsmith1495 how many of the crew are security?

    • @wabbit4936
      @wabbit4936 2 роки тому +80

      @@Joemamahahahaha821 you think he would know? No one knows because the thing hasn't been fucking built, although i'd have to imagine quite a few, not just for somali pirates but for onboard pirates too, the thing would have it's own police dpt

    • @Joemamahahahaha821
      @Joemamahahahaha821 2 роки тому +8

      @@wabbit4936 that’s why I was asking him he was so certain like “ oh it’ll have security” yes probably needs 20k for j security

    • @roberine7241
      @roberine7241 2 роки тому +21

      If this thing is ever build it will be destroyed by someone.

  • @yeaggermiester
    @yeaggermiester 2 роки тому +7

    I think you may have overlooked the log ships from the 1800s early 1900s. They were enormous. They basically just used huge chains to make absolutely humongous, ocean going log rafts. Mind boggling in scale.

    • @iambicpentakill971
      @iambicpentakill971 Рік тому +2

      Interesting, I didn't know about them. Only 700-1,000 feet long though.

  • @ethribin4188
    @ethribin4188 2 роки тому +4

    "Without paying any taxes to anyone ever again."
    Except paying rent live on the ship...
    So... taxes.

  • @MattMajcan
    @MattMajcan 3 роки тому +2194

    I love how this entire project was designed to avoid paying taxes but the residents would still have to regularly pay money to the ruling body of the country in order to keep it functioning. I think there's a name for that

    • @cuddlemuffin.9545
      @cuddlemuffin.9545 2 роки тому +240

      As long as it's not the T word suckers will do ot

    • @ejethan123
      @ejethan123 2 роки тому +133

      Except for one is completely voluntary and consensual if you choose to board it

    • @chubbygardener
      @chubbygardener 2 роки тому +184

      And don't forget their own mercenary army to protect them. Just imagine one day their mercenaries decide they'll be the new government. They can't demand the mercenaries because they don't accept any external law, so not law system to defend them. That will be beautiful.

    • @robertcarmosino6563
      @robertcarmosino6563 2 роки тому +40

      Condo , condo association, maintenance fees, condo commandos...

    • @JannPoo
      @JannPoo 2 роки тому +155

      @@ejethan123 Well if you choose to emigrate into a different country that would also be completely voluntary and consensual. And that's basically what that ship is intended to be, its own country.

  • @AlexSchmid-TheAceofSpades
    @AlexSchmid-TheAceofSpades 3 роки тому +647

    Let's not forget the physics of trying steer/stop this thing. The forces involved would be immense.
    It seems to me that most of the problems with this project could be solved by having multiple, smaller ships instead of a single, enormous ship.

    • @tipoima
      @tipoima 3 роки тому +64

      At that point anyone rich enough can just buy their own boat and do it themselves

    • @vigilantcosmicpenguin8721
      @vigilantcosmicpenguin8721 3 роки тому +64

      A well-placed iceberg could cause some tragic deja vu.

    • @laserbolt8600
      @laserbolt8600 3 роки тому +5

      @@vigilantcosmicpenguin8721 lmao

    • @Bruhlicioustoes
      @Bruhlicioustoes 3 роки тому +6

      That’s not the libertarian way

    • @glidemusic1023
      @glidemusic1023 3 роки тому +8

      @@vigilantcosmicpenguin8721 An Iceberg wouldn't phase this thing

  • @captainevenslower4400
    @captainevenslower4400 2 роки тому +3

    This thing looks incredibly un-seaworthy. Considering it has to travel across the north Atlantic and Cape Horn.

  • @Tom-yu9if
    @Tom-yu9if 2 роки тому +2

    Imagine the security it would need. Literally a boat full of some of the most hated people on the planet.

    • @crhu319
      @crhu319 Рік тому

      Only "some" ...if lucky, "all".

  • @medic2229
    @medic2229 3 роки тому +678

    They missed an epic opportunity to call it the “Freedom Freighter”

    • @belgarano4576
      @belgarano4576 3 роки тому

      Lol

    • @jamessummers5946
      @jamessummers5946 3 роки тому +2

      nice one

    • @kiki9373
      @kiki9373 3 роки тому

      Sorry can you please educate me I thought freight had to do with trucking

    • @medic2229
      @medic2229 3 роки тому +2

      @@kiki9373 it also has to do with ships, i just thought it would be more memorable of a name instead of the Freedom ship

    • @kiki9373
      @kiki9373 3 роки тому +1

      @@medic2229 it's cool, it does sound way better tho

  • @HarmKaban
    @HarmKaban 3 роки тому +258

    After that project failed, he built an underwater city called Rupture, but that's a story for another time...

    • @mechanomics2649
      @mechanomics2649 3 роки тому +39

      Ah yes Rupture, the shareware version of Rapture.

    • @aexetan2769
      @aexetan2769 3 роки тому +14

      "I chose the impossible. I chose... Rapture, a city where the artist would not fear the censor, where the scientist would not be bound by petty morality, where the great would not be constrained by the small! And with the sweat of your brow, Rapture can become your city as well."

    • @dustin3170
      @dustin3170 3 роки тому +6

      I’m playing this game right now lol

    • @seanbigay1042
      @seanbigay1042 3 роки тому +1

      An underwater city called Rupture? Seriously? What's next -- maybe he renames his Freedom Ship the Titanic, or designs a yacht called the Mary Celeste, or a spaceship called the Challenger ...

    • @aexetan2769
      @aexetan2769 3 роки тому

      @@seanbigay1042 It was a typo, intentional or not. Obviously he meant Rapture, which has a completely different meaning.
      Rupture, an instance of breaking or bursting suddenly and completely.
      Rapture, a feeling of intense pleasure or joy.

  • @bobbun9630
    @bobbun9630 2 роки тому +4

    I wonder what the light manufacturing is for... They're already going to have to import every scrap of food, why not just import all the manufactured stuff as well? Maybe the reason for having it is so that the people who can afford this have some common laborers to exploit in the manner to which they have become accustomed?
    For some odd reason, by the way, I look at those pictures and the phrase "deathtrap in a fire" comes to mind.

  • @sunseraph1919
    @sunseraph1919 2 роки тому +6

    “I shouldn’t have to pay taxes!!! 🤬”
    “Oh, I’m just gonna charge you guys a little HOA fee to keep the ship running. You totes understand, right? 😇”
    -the douchebag who designed this ship

  • @neonwired4978
    @neonwired4978 2 роки тому +980

    "no taxes but we will need some money every month for upkeep costs, gas, paying the crew etc. and then we'll probably need police and healthcare and your kids will probably want to go to school so we'll need money for that every month, we'll just take a percentage of your income to cover that but no taxes!"

    • @MeM_UK
      @MeM_UK 2 роки тому +17

      We?
      Yes, there would be upkeep and fuel costs. Crew costs too. Police and fire would need funding, to some extent. Healthcare could be entirely private though. So could schools.

    • @jevinday
      @jevinday 2 роки тому +48

      I know right? By paying to live there you're paying to help it run and function. You can call it whatever you want. Technically it would just be called "part of your rent", but hell, call it a snozberry pie if you want, I don't give a shit. Whatever you call it, you're still paying taxes. Oh I just remembered, if you want to tax someone but you dont want to use the word tax you use the word 'fee'. Like how postmates taxes you double, but they split it in half, one is a 'tax' and the other a 'service fee'.

    • @GiegueX
      @GiegueX 2 роки тому +15

      Man some libertards will believe in the same concept as long as its not the T word

    • @EmpressMermaid
      @EmpressMermaid 2 роки тому +16

      There's also going to develop a huge class divide. As stated, there is a fairly large crew on board. Alot of those "fees" (uh..hm...taxes) would go to their pay, upkeep and support. We all know the nature of the privileged rich and we all know what the nature of their "utopia" will be.

    • @averagejoe6031
      @averagejoe6031 2 роки тому +25

      @randomguy8196 What about the workers on this ship? They would have to live in it as well. It's almost like you can't have a society of just billionaires because its poor people who do the actual work that keeps a society running. So fuck them I guess? Well they tried that in the gilded age and guess what happened? labor riots happened.

  • @Vanderlism
    @Vanderlism 3 роки тому +534

    “The largest ship seriously designed” I think we have different definitions of the word “seriously”

    • @Omar-if3vd
      @Omar-if3vd 3 роки тому +63

      I mean I can easily design a spaceship the size of the sun in 5 mins. It takes doing the actual engineering of it to be considered "seriously designed".

    • @innosam123
      @innosam123 3 роки тому +37

      @@Omar-if3vd I think the difference here is that it’s actually designed to be physically possible and have a feasible business plan for existing (tax havens and vacations).
      People would be taking it a lot more seriously if someone like Elon Musk got their name on the project.
      Colonizing Mars is way crazier and more ambitious than this shit, and somehow people take it seriously.

    • @RickJaeger
      @RickJaeger 3 роки тому +2

      I believe it is clearly serious in the sense of "Designed with the intent of actually bringing it about," whether or not you believe it's serious in the sense of "Perfectly sane, reasonable, practical, and economical."

    • @johnabuick
      @johnabuick 3 роки тому

      @@innosam123 How do you keep your money safe from governments that really want it. The US government puts serious pressure on other country's banking systems when they send the tax man after you.

    • @rafetizer
      @rafetizer 3 роки тому +1

      @@innosam123 That's because people are saps. :P

  • @AlKohaiMusic
    @AlKohaiMusic 2 роки тому +3

    I love the 90’s era animation for showing off the project. Helps communicate just how long this project has been “in development “ for.

  • @AximVidya
    @AximVidya 2 роки тому +4

    man if they do ever end up actually building it, it sure would be a shame if something were to happen to it.

  • @gitchfitness6591
    @gitchfitness6591 3 роки тому +430

    Future Real Life Lore episode: How the Freedom Ship permanently blocked the Suez Canal

    • @brokkrep
      @brokkrep 3 роки тому +14

      That would be hilariously funny.

    • @khanhnguyen-tt3ff
      @khanhnguyen-tt3ff 3 роки тому +8

      Lol the us would sink it on the first day it blocked the Suez canal.

    • @alfaseeds13
      @alfaseeds13 3 роки тому +10

      Nah we got some nukes to vanished it, with those nukes, we can even create a larger canal

    • @puggus6547
      @puggus6547 3 роки тому +5

      @@alfaseeds13 It’s been rumored

    • @alexv3357
      @alexv3357 3 роки тому +5

      It's far too wide to fit through the Canal at all, there's no way it could even attempt that journey

  • @tylerrsmith443
    @tylerrsmith443 3 роки тому +749

    Being on a cruise ship for eternity sounds like a punishment dreamed up in the hell only Dante could describe.

    • @jorgeponsa7464
      @jorgeponsa7464 3 роки тому +34

      Eh retirees do it all the time, its not that bad if u think about it. Hotel style living arrangement, movies, pools, gyms, restourants, entertainment all close to u

    • @BatCostumeGuy
      @BatCostumeGuy 3 роки тому +12

      @@jorgeponsa7464 also a visit to alot, alot of countries everyday.

    • @juliawilliams1355
      @juliawilliams1355 3 роки тому +21

      Yeah traveling the world in luxury continuously without having to pay taxes sounds fucking rough. Also I'm pretty sure this video and the guy who came up with the idea described it...sooooo

    • @Bruhlicioustoes
      @Bruhlicioustoes 3 роки тому +6

      No taxes. Therefore it’s worth it

    • @1987AnimeBoy
      @1987AnimeBoy 3 роки тому +3

      I wonder if it's like in the Twilight Zone episode "A Nice Place to Visit".

  • @coffeearch2906
    @coffeearch2906 2 роки тому +3

    I see two major flaws: either make the ship shorter to fit at least the Suez Canal or make it longer to accomodate a full private jet enabled double runway (for the rich CEO on board) to land some modern jet planes on.

  • @SuperFlyCH
    @SuperFlyCH 2 роки тому +5

    Never mind the fact that many of these rich folks had made their money on the backs of tax payers that helped to build the infrastructure ultimately making their businesses possible. Also, what happens if a country wanted to seize this ship and did it militarily? Let me guess, they would look for help from countries to use their tax prayer paid militaries. Funny how they would benefit from others paying taxes, but are appalled when they are asked to pay taxes themselves.

  • @iamafreeman253
    @iamafreeman253 3 роки тому +649

    2021 - The Evergreen gets stuck in the Suez canal
    2025 - The Suez canal gets stuck in the Freedom Ship :)

  • @ohpurpled
    @ohpurpled 2 роки тому +1559

    To be fair 2.5 times the cost of the “Freedom Tower” says more about the tower than the ship and, if anything, makes the cost seem _less_ insane

    • @sasugage2168
      @sasugage2168 2 роки тому +31

      Look up how much the us military ships costs

    • @mebraedon
      @mebraedon 2 роки тому +41

      the freedom tower was actually a lot for a sky scraper though, it took a lot more money to build than the burk khalifa

    • @Kualinar
      @Kualinar 2 роки тому +26

      That's only the preliminary cost estimate. The conception phase is not finished yet, and it probably nearing the billion. That's the kind of project where the actual costs can get to 1000% to 10 000% over the original estimates.

    • @lzh4950
      @lzh4950 2 роки тому +6

      @@sasugage2168 The USS Gerald R. Ford cost about the same as HK's W Kowloon railway station plus its underground HSR link between in & mainland China I recall

    • @ravenouself4181
      @ravenouself4181 2 роки тому +3

      @@sasugage2168 almost 800 billion dollars

  • @akihikosakurai4013
    @akihikosakurai4013 2 роки тому +2

    Listen, take it from a Japanese ww2 enthusiast. Building the biggest ship ever isn't necessarily a good thing. We built the biggest and most powerful battleship to ever exist, it was called the IJN Yamato. It truly was a magnificent creature. But unfortunately being the biggest battleship in history makes you really easy to hit so it ended up being sunk. Quite literally the definition of glass cannon. It packs a massive punch but it was also very vulnerable to aerial attacks and torpedos due to its sheer size

  • @sambarrett3059
    @sambarrett3059 2 роки тому +2

    How would that work in an emergency, if the ship held that many people, a rescue effort would require so many ships it would be unreal.
    Not to mention that the planned route went through loads of bad areas, Cape of good home, the sea near Somalia.

  • @LahtariFIN
    @LahtariFIN 2 роки тому +1790

    This ship would make for a great setting for a disaster movie. Imagine 100 000 people, most of whom shady Wall Street bankers with no real life skills, all rushing to the lifeboats at the same time.

    • @ThePyroRussian
      @ThePyroRussian 2 роки тому +178

      its libertarian it won't have life boats.

    • @LucasFernandez-fk8se
      @LucasFernandez-fk8se 2 роки тому +86

      @@ThePyroRussian life boats are just more welfare. If you want a life boat why didn’t you tie your private yacht to the back of it like the rest of us

    • @saraperry6667
      @saraperry6667 2 роки тому +66

      I feel like I saw a movie with a similar plot a few years ago. It didn't go too well for the rich people. Or the poor people. Or... anyone, really, now that I think about it.

    • @iamnotuta2658
      @iamnotuta2658 2 роки тому +23

      @@saraperry6667 the iceberg of the ships

    • @Kualinar
      @Kualinar 2 роки тому +49

      A pirate commando boards the ship and take command of it. They demand a ransom of $100 000 000 for everyone aboard or they'll detonate a nuclear device in the middle of it.

  • @dakotaneumann1259
    @dakotaneumann1259 3 роки тому +322

    I’d imagine that maintaining such a super massive ship would be difficult, and engineering it’s structure to be hospitable for civilians would be a nightmare.. then imagine the noro virus outbreaks on the ship

    • @ronmaximilian6953
      @ronmaximilian6953 3 роки тому +11

      COVID-19

    • @Pixiuchu
      @Pixiuchu 3 роки тому +9

      @@ronmaximilian6953 Super Mario Sunshine's final level.

    • @fish3977
      @fish3977 3 роки тому +4

      they would all obviously pay a fee for upkeep and the services
      a certain cut on their income for common good

    • @q.e.d.9112
      @q.e.d.9112 3 роки тому

      I think the technical problems are solvable. The social and political ones much less so.

    • @mynameisgladiator1933
      @mynameisgladiator1933 3 роки тому +4

      I'd be more worried about the inevitable petty, absolute dictatorship that would install itself within a few months.

  • @DanielLe-ye4ro
    @DanielLe-ye4ro Рік тому

    Good channel. Thank you very much 🌹👍

  • @Knutwolf
    @Knutwolf 2 роки тому +1

    Dude, you have been told a million times already, but your narrator voice is... amazing!

  • @Nikolai_The_Crazed
    @Nikolai_The_Crazed 2 роки тому +560

    Okay, so there are several concerns I have with the project. One, ships need to be able to flex in rough seas. I’m almost certain that something like this would tear itself apart at sea, just based on the limits of the material alone. Two, this thing would disrupt sea traffic ANYWHERE it goes. Even parked out at sea, she would likely block major shipping/commercial routes. Her very presence would leach a port city dry from all the resources she’d need to take on, and all the goods she’s blocked off, each stop. Thirdly, the fuel consumption would be MASSIVE. Modern cargo ships, some of the largest vessels currently in existence, already use about 63,000 gallons of diesel per day. And given that she’s constantly on the move, she doesn’t have any set refueling locations. She could singlehandedly drain an entire port city of diesel, causing shortages in the area for weeks or even months. The sheer volume of resource consumption would likely lead many nations to deny her entry into their waters, meaning that resupplies would be even farther between. There’s a good chance that, after a few consecutive stops denying her entry, she would run out of fuel entirely and be stuck out at sea. Then you’d have to try and get help evacuating 100,000 people from a ship dead in the water. Freedom Ship not only sounds stupid, it is a logistical nightmare.

    • @dougerrohmer
      @dougerrohmer 2 роки тому +26

      Do you really think port cities, which are basically Walmarts of the sea, are gonna say "Uh, know, we really do not want to sell everything on our shelves all at once, even when we knew for months that you are coming"? This ship won't work for many reasons that you mentioned, but not the ports thing.

    • @Nikolai_The_Crazed
      @Nikolai_The_Crazed 2 роки тому +56

      @@dougerrohmer it’s not an issue of selling. They’ll sell to the ship just fine. It’s an issue of, other ships can’t get through to replace the resources it consumes, and it’s draining so much of it that everything else doesn’t get anything. It would cause shortages everywhere it goes. If that creates enough public tension, the city/county might not have a choice but to deny harbor, or they risk an uproar.

    • @dougerrohmer
      @dougerrohmer 2 роки тому +3

      @@Nikolai_The_Crazed If the ship physically blocks access, that's one thing. But these things don't happen overnight - they can predict their orders weeks in advance and adjust stock level accordingly, unless their is an international shortage of something maybe.

    • @Nikolai_The_Crazed
      @Nikolai_The_Crazed 2 роки тому +40

      @@dougerrohmer Well, there is a limit to how much a port can carry. We’re talking about something the size of a literal small city. They don’t have limitless space for cargo, and we’re still talking about a logistics nightmare just to get this thing fueled. The trucks and ships needed to bring more stuff in might not have enough left if a large portion of the diesel is going to a floating city. Because this thing isn’t just supplying for the time being, they’re stocking up in advance in case a trip runs longer than it has to. The largest container ships can hold about 21,000 containers, and that’s considered pushing the limits on what a port can handle in a day. The port in the city of Los Angeles handled about 30,000 containers a day last year, and it’s one of the busiest in the world. And a port isn’t necessarily a place where things are sold, it’s a transit hub. They transport the goods, they’re like UPS. They take the stuff coming in and make sure it goes to the right place. This thing would need a supply chain all of its own. Because of the volume of trade, this thing would need its own ports just to keep it stocked and fueled, because it would otherwise put a massive strain on the port. It would reduce the carrying capacity of a port for days or even weeks on end, as ferries take the goods back and forth bit by bit. All with a behemoth lingering off the coast, blocking major shipping from coming in, and siphoning tons of fuel just to keep the tank full while she waits. Because they need electricity, and they’re gonna get most of it from the engines running. So the port has nothing coming in, and it’s possibly well above half capacity, trying to get as much of their cargo out to the ship as fast as possible. Since nothing can get in, and things are only going out, it causes shortages further down the supply chain, while they struggle to find other ways of getting the goods into their city. Shortages mean scarcity, and scarcity means a price hike. With a jump in prices and lack of stock, it would only be a matter of time before the city gets enough complaints to tell the port to deny the ship passage and bar it from coming back. This thing is a logistics nightmare to keep running, and would basically cause a small economic crisis everywhere it goes. I’d say it’s pretty spot on to say this thing would be impossible to keep running, just based on that alone.

    • @Nikolai_The_Crazed
      @Nikolai_The_Crazed 2 роки тому +12

      @@dougerrohmer Oh, and need I forget, transporting that many goods into the area by means other than cargo ship would be difficult to say the least. A cargo ship can carry so many containers, it would take up a train almost forty four miles long. For one ships worth of goods. You could use trucks, but there aren’t enough of them, and they cause traffic jams, slowing down shipping even further. You could try planes, but not many can carry a single container’s worth of stuff, let alone several. The reason ports work so effectively is because they get a large volume of material in before it’s even needed. So most of it doesn’t get sent out right away, the truck and trains have plenty of time to get things moving. If you’re carrying materials in from other ports because one is closed down, that’s a major delay, and if you don’t make up that time then you risk losing ground and creating a shortage. But if you push too much at any given time, you could also cause an accident, causing substantial delays and even bigger shortages. A port is basically the back bone of shipping in a given area, if you block it off like that it causes major problems.

  • @moodyriver6673
    @moodyriver6673 3 роки тому +270

    He also owned a restaraunt named “Food Shop”, he had a cat named “Not a dog” and a goldfish called “Wet orange thing”

  • @PopeDope69-420
    @PopeDope69-420 2 роки тому +4

    I could not imagine the horror of landing a plane on a ship. I know they do it in the military but these are passenger planes

    • @Jack1994hoo
      @Jack1994hoo Рік тому +1

      Not only that, but fighter jets and attack planes are tiny in comparisson, imagine trying to land a 737 here.

  • @sp0nge1337
    @sp0nge1337 Рік тому +1

    I think the worst thing about this whole insane project is that the ship looks like a giant square floating box.

  • @marcosettembre
    @marcosettembre 3 роки тому +244

    Freedom ship: tries to enter in the Suez Canal
    Egypt: *Ever given horrible flashback*

    • @Exoticlover1629
      @Exoticlover1629 3 роки тому +3

      it would have no reason to enter the Suez canal in the first place

    • @satos1
      @satos1 3 роки тому +6

      @@Exoticlover1629 it might want to take a short cut and conveniently get stuck like the Ever given.

    • @HarshRaj-xd6ix
      @HarshRaj-xd6ix 3 роки тому +5

      @@satos1 will it even fit in the hole
      That's what she said

    • @Devlinator61116
      @Devlinator61116 3 роки тому +1

      Even Given? Do you mean Ever Given?

    • @marcosettembre
      @marcosettembre 3 роки тому +3

      @@Devlinator61116 sorry for the mistake I changed it

  • @LtNduati
    @LtNduati 3 роки тому +698

    If a 40mph wind gave birth to one of the best memes of 2021, imagine if this thing got partially stuck in a hurricane?
    We'd be able to see the sea floor without needing a submarine.

    • @GreenBlueWalkthrough
      @GreenBlueWalkthrough 3 роки тому +26

      Not much the ship is really heavy and it moves so like a normal ruise ship it can just get out of the way.

    • @LtNduati
      @LtNduati 3 роки тому +78

      @@GreenBlueWalkthrough I apologize if my original comment wasn't clear, but this is what's commonly known as a "joke". Please let me know how else to explain the concept of a "joke" within a UA-cam comment, or how I can improve my jokes. P.S. This reply is what is commonly referred to as "sarcasm".

    • @GreenBlueWalkthrough
      @GreenBlueWalkthrough 3 роки тому +29

      @@LtNduati Oh sorry most people who say stuff like that are not joking.

    • @181cameron
      @181cameron 3 роки тому +11

      If this ship, with a bunch of rich folks on it, got stuck somewhere...
      I don't think I'd be the only one who'd want it blown up.

    • @joefollo4891
      @joefollo4891 3 роки тому +3

      @@LtNduati that’s kind of a dickish reply. Your joke was a normal concern, why be rude to someone taking you seriously?

  • @FlippinDayton
    @FlippinDayton 2 роки тому +1

    My favorite part is how it says the ship will have zero taxes, but then says they will have to pay some small fees to cover maintenance of the ship and salaries for the workers on the ship. Aren’t those taxes?

  • @ADefenestrator
    @ADefenestrator 2 роки тому +4

    "Libertarian dream country". Surely this time it won't turn out to be a disaster like all of the previous attempts.

    • @charlieputzel7735
      @charlieputzel7735 2 роки тому +1

      As it turns out, we actually need a government to keep people from killing each other. Anarchists need to hear this too.

  • @overlordpichu5577
    @overlordpichu5577 2 роки тому +635

    ya know, this just screams the kinda crazy idea that ends with a mass class uprising of the hired crew taking over the ship after being forced to live in the furnace room.

    • @Sentient_Blob
      @Sentient_Blob 2 роки тому +79

      Whatever mercenary army they decide to hire could just hold the entire ship hostage and ransom off every single billionaire, and they wouldn’t be able to do anything about it since the ship doesn’t abide to any other countries’ law

    • @aragorn1780
      @aragorn1780 2 роки тому +33

      Nice running water you got there... Would be really nice if the maintenance crew... SHUT IF OFF! (Pulls valve)

    • @25852Dan
      @25852Dan 2 роки тому +25

      The movie, snowpiercer, comes to mind.

    • @bjack8315
      @bjack8315 2 роки тому +5

      Bro quit living in your socialist fantasy

    • @nikitaegregr
      @nikitaegregr 2 роки тому +19

      As opposed to the original capitalist fantasy of a kilometre long ship that's basically Rapture but worse?

  • @atdynax
    @atdynax 2 роки тому +1817

    So he wants to build a ship with money that is more than he has to pay taxes?

    • @iloveprivacy8167
      @iloveprivacy8167 2 роки тому +116

      The cost isn't as crazy as it might seem: $10 billion among 40,000 people is $250k each.

    • @jokerplays6139
      @jokerplays6139 2 роки тому +22

      @@iloveprivacy8167 yea I can pay that every month!

    • @andres.6126
      @andres.6126 2 роки тому +63

      @@jokerplays6139 did you watch the video? That would be just the investment to build it, I’m sure once it’s built a more reasonable price would be generated.

    • @kapwns
      @kapwns 2 роки тому +103

      the rich have a disdain for paying taxes because they absolutely hate the poor.

    • @trevor7355
      @trevor7355 2 роки тому +49

      @@jokerplays6139 this would be for the mega-rich to dodge taxes. I can guarantee they see 250k as nothing.

  • @kpk1171
    @kpk1171 2 роки тому +2

    In regards to the sponsor, I actually listened to Artemis on Audible about a year ago! Artemis was an extremely good book with lots of science behind it, as well as Audible being a very good audiobook platform(my personal choice)

  • @shooby9496
    @shooby9496 Рік тому +1

    It'd be cool to work on something like that. Only downside would be rich snobs and I've been dealing with those most of my life. Would definitely let it be out to sea for a few months first to make sure it worked right though lol.

  • @NicholasMonks
    @NicholasMonks 3 роки тому +501

    "You won't have to pay any taxes! Though, you will have to pay regular administration fees to support the infrastructure of the ship, but we assure you that those will never skyrocket to the level of taxes you have to pay now!"
    Well, they say there's a sucker born every minute...

    • @zaramikazuki8374
      @zaramikazuki8374 3 роки тому +73

      For real, like what to these idiots think taxes they are trying to dodge are even intended to do? Suckers ready to pay taxes as long as it is not literally called taxes...

    • @diegorodriguez6719
      @diegorodriguez6719 3 роки тому +44

      I'm glad someone pointed this out. Live on boat to avoid taxes only to end up paying taxes to maintain said boat.

    • @dekippiesip
      @dekippiesip 3 роки тому +10

      A big difference is that those taxes are probably some fixed amount per month.
      But in a normal country rich people will pay a fixed percentage of their income on tax at best, and increasing percentages as they get richer at worst. No matter how high the costs per month get on this ship, their will always be people whose income is so great that even a small percentage tax on their income will dwarf the fixed monthly fees needed to live on this ship.

    • @Laura-Yu
      @Laura-Yu 3 роки тому +34

      @@dekippiesip Lol no, the operating costs of a ship goes up as the ship ages. And for many other safety reasons, it’s not worth living on a large ass ship to evade taxes. Hell, just go to some poor country with shit tax laws, that’s what the “normal” shady rich bitches do.

    • @dekippiesip
      @dekippiesip 3 роки тому +3

      @@Laura-Yu that sounds like a better deal for now yes. If such countries come under pressure to change their tax laws at some point, then this concept may become feasible however. In my country you pay almost 50% tax on your income in the highest bracket. For even multi millionaires this ship is going to be cheaper than living in my country. And in some countries that upper rate is even higher.
      Look at it this way, you don't pay taxes on this ship, you basically just pay very high rent. Like rent, the amount you pay is not income dependent. So a small low key millionaire pays the same monthly fees as a billionaire. It's this income independence that makes this ship a better deal than paying taxes in almost any country, with some notable tax havens as exceptions.

  • @lifesupport5478
    @lifesupport5478 3 роки тому +78

    Imagine it would not fit into any drydock. When the hull gets compromised we'd finally know that Atlantis wasn't a tale but a premonition.

  • @egg_runner8379
    @egg_runner8379 Рік тому +5

    Im amazed he didnt talk about the massive threat something like this would just have from the ocean itself, extreme storms and waves ect have a chance to cause massive damage to such a massive money sink.

    • @iambicpentakill971
      @iambicpentakill971 Рік тому +2

      Yeah, that is open Pacific Ocean for a good chunk of the journey.

  • @desperado3236
    @desperado3236 2 роки тому +3

    I dont know why they didnt think of building smaller ships that you could anchor and attach together into 1 big complex when not moving and when moving, detach into the smaller ships. Seems to me a way better idea as your building it in working pieces and if project fails half way, you still have working ships.

  • @illturralli
    @illturralli 2 роки тому +593

    This ship looks like it was designed by a highschool freshman that has no knowledge of of the sea.
    But neat idea.

    • @Sentient_Blob
      @Sentient_Blob 2 роки тому +26

      Wouldn’t the thing snap in half due to all the waves bending and pulling at it?

    • @illturralli
      @illturralli 2 роки тому +53

      @@Sentient_Blob It surely is would, it has no framework,or even a keel, no freeboard or bulbous bow either.
      Designing does not take materials or such into consideration. But functionality has to be considered.
      This ship does not even have lifeboats. Or ladders. It GG if you fall overboard in tbe middle of the Atlantic Ocean... Not only because you can't get up again, or the ice cold water. The water turbulence that's caused from the lack of a bulbous bow will drag you under water.

    • @tabby73
      @tabby73 2 роки тому +5

      @@illturralli would a missing keel make it more unstable? The center of gravity looks precariously high to me! 😯

    • @higueraft571
      @higueraft571 2 роки тому +25

      @@illturralli Dont forget the fact that this thing is supposed to be long-term, including during Hurricanes and *rogue waves*. Meaning it's gotta survive far more beatings than most modern ships could even survive.

    • @LucasFernandez-fk8se
      @LucasFernandez-fk8se 2 роки тому +4

      I started designing this idea around 6 and stopped designing this idea around 8 years old. I don’t see how they can look at this and not think “that’s gonna sink”

  • @henriquek.7355
    @henriquek.7355 3 роки тому +916

    They don’t have enough money to even make a good 3D perspective video, imagine to actually build this thing

    • @penusliski
      @penusliski 2 роки тому +112

      According to timeline, I guess this animation is like at least 25 years old so it's not that bad

    • @tornadochaser7226
      @tornadochaser7226 2 роки тому +19

      They never got the funding to build the ship, so no funding for animations either

    • @Girtharmstrong69
      @Girtharmstrong69 2 роки тому +2

      @@penusliski 25 years ago they knew how to design ships bruh…. So not an excuse for this abomination

    • @penusliski
      @penusliski 2 роки тому +46

      @@Girtharmstrong69 I was referring to CGI animation, not to the ship design

    • @Girtharmstrong69
      @Girtharmstrong69 2 роки тому +2

      @@penusliski your comment was responding to a comment about design…..

  • @RPSchonherr
    @RPSchonherr 2 роки тому +1

    One issue that would be a serious one is piracy. Not being flagged to any nation the ship would be open to constant attacks with no one to help.

  • @dinoelasz6360
    @dinoelasz6360 2 роки тому

    On West Caicos some company built a huge resort but went bankrupt before completion. It was a similar idea tho. Now West Caicos has a long ghost resort occupying the beach on the provo side

  • @bgcvetan
    @bgcvetan 3 роки тому +563

    There could be only ONE captain worthy of such ship: Francesco Schettino.

    • @lv7603
      @lv7603 3 роки тому +92

      Closer Francesco, I want to touch the coast.

    • @justinh6651
      @justinh6651 3 роки тому +5

      So true.

    • @fangabxyfangabxy8563
      @fangabxyfangabxy8563 3 роки тому +1

      Where’s the captain?

    • @ZaHandle
      @ZaHandle 3 роки тому +43

      And where is the ship?
      what do you mean you abandoned it people are still on it
      The plane pushed you out?

    • @chrisogrady28
      @chrisogrady28 3 роки тому +14

      @@ZaHandle i can't help but read all of this in Internet Historian's voice

  • @Saxandviolins
    @Saxandviolins 3 роки тому +505

    This ship and Snowpiercer should make a baby

    • @isaackangas6921
      @isaackangas6921 3 роки тому +7

      This ship is snowpiercers baby

    • @TheHuaj
      @TheHuaj 3 роки тому +13

      @@isaackangas6921 no, this ship is snowpiercers daddy

    • @juhbell1852
      @juhbell1852 3 роки тому +4

      Their child is a plane that never lands lol

    • @absolutely1337
      @absolutely1337 3 роки тому

      Yes, but would they have to pay taxes, this clip wasn’t clear or mention this.

    • @drewfinn2
      @drewfinn2 3 роки тому +1

      @@absolutely1337 yes in the form of condo fees and/or HOA’s...fact is is that it’s something totally bombastic to which the ultra hoarding rich can eventually complain about n be miserable w their billions...and still play victim

  • @albeit1
    @albeit1 2 роки тому +1

    Probably easier to design interfaces by which vessels could join one or more other vessels. Each with its own propulsion, ownership, ability to leave.

  • @connormclernon26
    @connormclernon26 Рік тому +1

    Frank Fontaine: they all think they’re gonna be captains of industry. But they all forget. Someone’s gotta scrub the toilets

  • @connormatthews7437
    @connormatthews7437 3 роки тому +134

    This is the kinda stuff me and the boys dreamed of building in minecraft when we were 9

    • @walterbrunswick
      @walterbrunswick 3 роки тому +3

      and then you grew up... (I hope)

    • @okaychamp6577
      @okaychamp6577 3 роки тому

      @WAN Chi Tao Adrian lmao

    • @ghrvjdev
      @ghrvjdev 3 роки тому

      Impossible in real life but possible with Minecraft

    • @1mol831
      @1mol831 3 роки тому

      @@ghrvjdev But ships in Minecraft don't really move unless you make an extremely big piston mechanisms, which usually break apart.

  • @aaronstorm1682
    @aaronstorm1682 3 роки тому +153

    Ice berg that sunk the titanic: Finally! A worthy opponent! Our battle will be legendary!

    • @Edgeperor
      @Edgeperor 3 роки тому +15

      *Iceberg gets destroyed*

    • @dinosaurking3822
      @dinosaurking3822 3 роки тому +16

      Global warming: I'm going to stop you right there

    • @ElectriKong-
      @ElectriKong- 3 роки тому +5

      @@dinosaurking3822 Global warming could unleash an army of icebergs, for a short while at least.

    • @swank8508
      @swank8508 3 роки тому +1

      these rich people are the reason the iceberg that sunk the titanic is melting, so i think its safe to say rich people win this battle

    • @grownfungus
      @grownfungus 3 роки тому +2

      Haha Reddit moment keanu chungus wholesome 100!!!!

  • @xavier84623
    @xavier84623 2 роки тому +1

    It looks kinda cool tho. Very sci fi. Imagine the engine rooms and pipes and stuff. The urban ecosystems.

  • @georgehorvath83
    @georgehorvath83 2 роки тому +2

    I had a crazy idea like this at one point in my life. And then I turned eight.

  • @greypaladin4560
    @greypaladin4560 3 роки тому +131

    I spent 5 minutes on Twitter today, so all I can think of is how convenient it would be to have a huge chuck of the ultrarich in one, big, sinkable ship.

    • @drabnail777
      @drabnail777 3 роки тому +19

      Twiiter is a massive risk factor for cancer development

    • @jacobarcher1097
      @jacobarcher1097 3 роки тому

      @@drabnail777 SO's being alive

    • @SnootchieBootchies27
      @SnootchieBootchies27 3 роки тому

      Very convenient, indeed.

    • @TheRealZeke2003
      @TheRealZeke2003 3 роки тому +1

      @@drabnail777 Truuu

    • @brofacemcgee3062
      @brofacemcgee3062 3 роки тому +1

      That's not gonna work, the billionares are melting all the icebergs we could sink it with

  • @nacoran
    @nacoran 3 роки тому +435

    What's scary is that there are multiple people alive who could build this just with their own fortune.

    • @yume5338
      @yume5338 3 роки тому +57

      to have it immediately crumble and shatter under its own weight

    • @Numberonesorabjifan
      @Numberonesorabjifan 3 роки тому +19

      Why is that scary?

    • @aexetan2769
      @aexetan2769 3 роки тому +53

      Some Jeff could build 15 of these today, and still be left with $48 billion.

    • @jadsmvs8651
      @jadsmvs8651 3 роки тому +57

      @@aexetan2769 If he liquidated is assets and got rid of his means of making money ever again, sure.

    • @gamermapper
      @gamermapper 3 роки тому +10

      Money can't buy everything. You need good logistics. This ship could break away.

  • @dontcare4814
    @dontcare4814 2 роки тому +1

    Another problem I could see would be with the conference room. International leaders could be talking and then a terrorist group or another country's army uses lots of bombs on the ship, not only killing these very important people but also thousands more. A country could capture the ship and use it to transport loads of soldiers and weaponry. These conflicts will do too much damage, and the ship might become no more at some point.

  • @HelloHello-rl6gu
    @HelloHello-rl6gu 2 роки тому +1

    Dodge taxes by joining this ship!
    You have to pay rent and utilities fees... Wait, that's just taxes.

  • @tehkill3r
    @tehkill3r 3 роки тому +146

    Fuck, I remember this ship. A classmate had it as a presentation project in the 90s. Had completely forgotten about it.

    • @Unknown12462
      @Unknown12462 3 роки тому +8

      damn your old

    • @samisikdar5417
      @samisikdar5417 3 роки тому +3

      You’ve been on UA-cam longer than I’ve been alive lol

    • @charlesshreeve319
      @charlesshreeve319 3 роки тому +7

      @@Unknown12462 Damn his old what?

    • @AzureStory
      @AzureStory 3 роки тому +7

      @@Unknown12462 his old what?

    • @acoffeewithsatan
      @acoffeewithsatan 3 роки тому +4

      The whole idea also seems like something some kid would come up with, back in middle school

  • @undead890
    @undead890 3 роки тому +613

    Hmm, a Libertarian wants to start a new country in the ocean and it all falls apart, where have I head that before.
    *Slowly looks at Bioshock*

    • @cornheadahh
      @cornheadahh 3 роки тому +34

      Rapture was Anarcho-Capitalist and not Libertarian. Rapture literally had no government.

    • @kincade7473
      @kincade7473 3 роки тому +37

      @@cornheadahh Anarcho-Capitalism (derogatory)

    • @kingofshadows1041
      @kingofshadows1041 3 роки тому +4

      Research Donald Marshall on Human Cloning!!

    • @Kukainis
      @Kukainis 3 роки тому +15

      @@kincade7473 at least it's not an oxy moron like Anarcho-Communism

    • @kincade7473
      @kincade7473 3 роки тому +26

      @@Kukainis Anarcho-Capitalism is an oxymoron though, it leads to unjust hierarchy which anarchism fights against. Anarcho-Communism fits perfectly since communism is a stateless, classless, moneyless society.

  • @martineldritch
    @martineldritch 2 роки тому +1

    Waterworld meets Snowpiercer, what could go wrong? How many service personnel needed to work on that ship? And the people refusing to pay taxes are going to agree to tip the army of service workers or even pay them living wages ?

  • @WaveForceful
    @WaveForceful Рік тому +2

    It's actually a pretty cool idea, my only issue is, how deep will the draft of a 1.3km ship go underwater. It couldnt ever go near coast.

  • @Zefo_No
    @Zefo_No 3 роки тому +192

    I remember when Discovery channel and National Geographic were running back to back documentaries on this 'project'.
    It might be insane but you gotta admit, it's fun to think about.

    • @jonjohnson102
      @jonjohnson102 3 роки тому

      What happens when it sinks

    • @GreenBlueWalkthrough
      @GreenBlueWalkthrough 3 роки тому

      @@jonjohnson102 How many super carriers sink?

    • @GreenBlueWalkthrough
      @GreenBlueWalkthrough 3 роки тому +1

      It really isn;t more ahead of it's time but Japan could use a fleet of these.

    • @vultschlange
      @vultschlange 3 роки тому

      nice boat!!!

    • @gamermapper
      @gamermapper 3 роки тому

      Would international law allow 100000 people to not abide to any nation's law tho

  • @wfriendss
    @wfriendss 3 роки тому +263

    1:35 ah yes the ship is around 1370 KILOMETERS long

    • @GeneralRG
      @GeneralRG 3 роки тому +6

      Hahahahahhahaha!!! 😆

    • @UwU-235
      @UwU-235 3 роки тому +9

      Long boi

    • @pointlesssentience3987
      @pointlesssentience3987 3 роки тому +22

      I think some countries actually switch the comma and decimal point in notation for base 10 numbers. So 1,370 Km could mean 1.370Km which is more reasonable obviously.

    • @gamermapper
      @gamermapper 3 роки тому +3

      @@pointlesssentience3987 yes in France we use the space for separating thousands and the comma for decimals

    • @UwU-235
      @UwU-235 3 роки тому +1

      @@pointlesssentience3987 if I recall correctly, they do that in Germany, although I could be wrong and I’m too lazy to fact check myself.

  • @ShadowDragon-cw7wb
    @ShadowDragon-cw7wb Рік тому

    "The ship is meant as a method of tax evasion."
    The IRS:"Dear Mr. President, grab the football!"

  • @somebodyrandom3301
    @somebodyrandom3301 2 роки тому +1

    6:26 How do you plan on anchoring that thing

  • @giovanni-cx5fb
    @giovanni-cx5fb 3 роки тому +240

    "I'm never paying taxes again!"
    First stop, goes shopping: "Ok, sir, that will be 99.99 plus tax"
    :O

    • @sammcdermott78
      @sammcdermott78 3 роки тому +12

      The tax would be included in the price

    • @biggiec8224
      @biggiec8224 3 роки тому +8

      @@sammcdermott78 not in america.

    • @sammcdermott78
      @sammcdermott78 3 роки тому +2

      @@biggiec8224 really?

    • @biggiec8224
      @biggiec8224 3 роки тому +8

      @@sammcdermott78 i heard somewhere that sales taxes aren't included in the price over there

    • @justinh6651
      @justinh6651 3 роки тому +3

      @@sammcdermott78 yep. Prices don't include taxes on it.

  • @thelordnaevis4946
    @thelordnaevis4946 3 роки тому +467

    If this ever existed in the future for more than a hundred years then someone could be born here, raised, educated, married, have a family and die without ever leaving this gigantic boat

    • @BenedictF79B
      @BenedictF79B 3 роки тому +16

      Anime logic in girls und panzer their gigantic aircraft Carrier (city Carrier)

    • @mmercier0921
      @mmercier0921 3 роки тому +19

      People live like that today. I knew a kid in Brooklyn who didn't walk on asphalt for 20 years. You would be amazed, there are actually entire communities who use roof tops like others use the streets.
      That kid was a planner. He actually delivers high end alcohol from the sky, 24/7/365
      Catch him if you can. Even his birth was unrecorded.
      He was me until I found out.
      Now he is someone else.

    • @leek6927
      @leek6927 3 роки тому +39

      Michael Mercier Why did your comment slowly make less sense as it went on?

    • @slyseal2091
      @slyseal2091 3 роки тому +5

      @@leek6927 the rooftop korean took back control over his body

    • @technicolorwaterfowl849
      @technicolorwaterfowl849 3 роки тому +4

      Imagine how off balance they'd be on solid ground

  • @ruhan4204
    @ruhan4204 2 роки тому +2

    The day this embarks is the day I become a scurvy pirate pillaging my heart out..hehe

  • @jolleerancherswagman
    @jolleerancherswagman 2 роки тому +2

    imagine if they completed this ship but just for it to end up in the bottom of the ocean